Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations at STAR

Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations at STAR

Gang Wang (for the STAR111For the full list of STAR authors and acknowledgements, see appendix ‘Collaborations’ in this volume. Collaboration) University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA gwang@physics.ucla.edu
Abstract

We present STAR’s measurements of azimuthal correlations between non-photonic electrons and charged hadrons in p+p, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at GeV. In p+p collisions, from the non-photonic e-h correlation we have extracted the relative B meson semi-leptonic decay contributions to non-photonic electrons up to electron GeV/. In central Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions where a dense medium is created, we find that the e-h correlation on the away side of the trigger non-photonic electron has been modified in comparison with the expectation from PYTHIA simulations.

1 Motivation

In central Au+Au collisions at RHIC, electrons from heavy quark (charm and bottom) decays have been observed to be suppressed to a similar level as light hadrons [1, 2]. It is of great interest to separate non-photonic electron energy loss into the contributions from charm and bottom quarks. Since the near-side e-h azimuthal correlation from B decays is much wider than that from D decays for the same electron , STAR’s previous study [3] compared the experimental correlation results in p+p collisions with PYTHIA simulations, and found a substantial B contribution to non-photonic electrons up to electron GeV/. In this work, we extend this measurement to GeV/.

When high- partons lose a significant amount of energy through the dense QCD medium created in central Cu+Cu or Au+Au collisions, their azimuthal correlations with low- hadrons are modified accordingly, showing a broad or even double-peak structure on the away-side di-hadron correlation [4, 5]. Non-photonic electrons represent well the directions of the mother D or B mesons when electron 3 GeV/, and in the opposite direction we expect another heavy quark traversing the medium leaving an imprint on the away-side e-h correlation. This study of the correlated hadron azimuthal distribution from heavy quark energy loss in the dense QCD medium will provide insight on the mechanism responsible for the correlation pattern and the flavor dependence. Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions have very different system sizes, and enable us to have a systematic study on the system-size dependence of the non-photonic e-h correlation.

2 Data sets and the study

This study is based on STAR events with high-tower triggers at 200 GeV: 0.7 million p+p events in RUN VI, 1 million most central Cu+Cu events in RUN V, and 0.2 million Au+Au events in RUN VII. Tracks of charged particles are reconstructed by the STAR TPC [6]. To enhance the statistics for high electrons, the high-tower trigger requires that at least one track is projected into the STAR BEMC and its SMD [7], with the energy deposition above a threshold in a single tower of the BEMC. The high-tower thresholds are GeV (p+p), GeV (Cu+Cu) and GeV (Au+Au). The pseudorapidity () coverage in this study is for Cu+Cu, and for p+p and Au+Au collisions, to avoid the large photon conversion background for . The centrality definition used is the same as in Ref. [8].

Electron identification was carried out by combining the ionization energy loss in the TPC with the energy deposition in the BEMC and the shower profile in the SMD. (See details in [1] and [9].) The dominant photonic electron background is from photon conversions and , Dalitz decays, where electron pairs have small invariant masses. We pair up the electron candidates with tracks passing a very loose cut on E around the electron band, and examine the - invariant mass distribution of electron pairs with opposite signs (), by ignoring the opening angle to eliminate the tracking resolution effects [9]. The electron sample contains the true photonic background as well as the combinatorial background estimated by the same-sign pairs (). A cut of mass GeV/ rejects most photonic background.

To study the angular correlation of non-photonic electrons and charged hadrons, we start with the semi-inclusive electron sample (-), which is everything in the inclusive electron sample except for the with the mass cut. The latter term contains the reconstructed photonic electrons and the , or the with the mass cut. The correlation signal is then obtained by the equation . Here , where is the photonic electron reconstruction efficiency, and denotes the reconstructed photonic electron azimuthal correlations with charged hadrons after removing the photonic partners. The efficiency was estimated from simulations to be for p+p, for Cu+Cu, and for Au+Au. The details on the approach via - can be found in [3].

3 Results

Fig. 1 shows the B contribution to non-photonic electrons as a function of electron for 200 GeV p+p collisions, where the open stars represent the results from RUN V data [3] and the full stars, RUN VI data. Each point in Fig. 1 was obtained from the azimuthal correlation between the non-photonic electron with the corresponding and the charged hadrons with GeV/, after we fit the near side correlation with PYTHIA simulations. (See the fitting recipe in [3].) The systematical errors come from photonic electron reconstruction efficiency, different fitting ranges and different fitting functions. The solid curves show the range of relative bottom contribution from recent pQCD calculations (FONLL) [10]222FONLL calculations with CTEQ6M, GeV/, GeV/ and (for the central value of the range).. Preliminary STAR data are consistent with the FONLL calculations, and show almost the same B and D contributions to non-photonic electrons for GeV/. Together with the observed suppresion of non-photonic electrons in central Au+Au collisions, the measured ratios imply that bottom may be suppressed in central Au+Au collisions at RHIC, assuming the initial ratio is similar in Au+Au as in p+p.

Figure 1: B contribution to non-photonic electrons as a function of electron for 200GeV p+p collisions. The error bars are statistical, and the error brackets are systematical.
Figure 2: Non-photonic e-h correlation in Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV. Panel a) shows the correlation before background subtraction, and panel b), after the subtraction, with a dashed fitting curve from PYTHIA expectations on the away side. The error bars are statistical, and the error band around zero shows the systematical uncertainty from ZYAM.

Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 show non-photonic e-h correlations at 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions, respectively. The raw azimuthal correlations are plotted in panels a), with elliptic flow ([11] background curves determined with the Zero Yield at Minimum (ZYAM) approach [4]. The lower limits of are zero, and the upper limits are taken to be (for Cu+Cu) or (for Au+Au) of charged hadron measured for the same ranges as the trigger electron ( GeV/ GeV/) and the associated hadron ( GeV/ GeV/ for Cu+Cu, and GeV/ GeV/ for Au+Au). To enhance the statistics, the measured correlations are folded into , and the data points beyond are reflections. The azimuthal correlations after the subtraction of background are shown in panels b). Despite large statistical errors, clear correlation structures are present for both Cu+Cu and Au+Au. On the near side, there is one single peak representing the heavy quark fragmentation, and possible interactions with the medium. On the away side, instead of one peak around as in p+p collisions, the correlation functions are modified to be a broad or possible double-peak structure. A single peak structure expected from PYTHIA calculations can not describe the measured away side correlations. A PYTHIA fit to the away side structure yields values of to be (Cu+Cu) and (Au+Au). The away side broadness in both Cu+Cu and Au+Au is similar to the di-hadron correlation in Au+Au [5], and probably indicates heavy quark interaction with the dense medium.

Figure 3: Non-photonic e-h correlation in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Panel a) shows the correlation before background subtraction, and panel b), after the subtraction, with a dashed fitting curve from PYTHIA expectations on the away side. The error bars are statistical, and the error band around zero shows the systematical uncertainty from ZYAM.

References

References

  • [1] Abelev B I et al (STAR Collaboration) 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 192301
  • [2] Adler S S et al (PHENIX Collaboration) 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 032301
  • [3] Lin X et al (STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G 34 S821; Lin X 2007 PhD thesis IOPP China
  • [4] Adams J et al (STAR Collaboration) 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 152301
  • [5] Horner M et al (STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G 34 S995
  • [6] Anderson M et al 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 499 659
  • [7] Beddo M et al 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 499 725
  • [8] Adams J et al (STAR Collaboration) 2005 Phys. Rev. C 72 014904
  • [9] Dong W J 2006 PhD thesis UCLA
  • [10] Cacciari M et al 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 122001
  • [11] Poskanzer A M and Voloshin S A 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 1671
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
316014
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description