# New Results on the Fluctuating Two-Ray Model with Arbitrary Fading Parameters and Its Applications

###### Abstract

The fluctuating two-ray (FTR) fading model provides a much better fit than other fading models for small-scale fading measurements in millimeter wave communications. In this paper, using a mixture of gamma distributions, new exact analytical expressions for the probability density and cumulative distribution functions of the FTR distribution with arbitrary fading parameters are presented. Moreover, the performance of digital communication systems over the FTR fading channel is evaluated in terms of the channel capacity and the bit error rate. The interaction between channel fading parameters and system performance is further investigated. Our newly derived results extend and complement previous knowledge of the FTR fading model.

## I Introduction

One of the major challenges for future generation wireless networks is the efficient utilization of available spectrum resources. The millimeter wave (mmWave) and device-to-device (D2D), are regarded as promising technologies to this end [1, 2]. Further research effort has focused on the characterization of the mmWave and D2D channel, e.g. see [3, 4, 5, 6]. Recently, the so-called fluctuating two-ray (FTR) fading model, has been proposed as a versatile model that well characterizes wireless propagation in mmWave and D2D environments [7]. In contrast to the two-wave with diffuse power (TWDP) fading model [8], the specular components of the FTR model are varying amplitudes rather than constant amplitudes, which bring a better description of amplitude fluctuations. FTR fading model fits well experimental channel characterization/modeling data, such as those obtained by outdoor millimeter-wave field measurements at 28 GHz [9], and includes several well known distributions, i.e. the Gaussian, Rayleigh, Rician and Nakagami- ones, as special or limiting cases [7].

The probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the FTR fading model, assuming integer values of its shadowing parameter, , have been derived in [7] by employing inverse Laplace transforms. In the same work, approximate expressions for the PDF and CDF have also been presented in terms of a mixture of gamma distributions, under the assumption of integer . In realistic propagation scenarios, however, is an arbitrary positive real number.

Motivated by the above facts, this paper extends the work of [7] and derives a generic analytical framework for the statistical characterization of the FTR fading model, assuming arbitrary positive values of , and in terms of elementary functions and coefficients consisting of fading parameters. Also, our derived results facilitate the performance analysis of wireless communication systems operating in the FTR fading channel. Based on the above formula, novel analytical expressions for the channel capacity of FTR fading channels and the bit error rate (BER) of various binary modulation formats are deduced. Asymptotic BER results that become tight at high-SNR values are further presented, that offer valuable insights as to the impact of fading parameters on the system performance. The results presented herein enable the evaluation of critical performance metrics at low computational complexity, and thus, they are useful to the system engineer for performance evaluation purposes.

## Ii Statistical Characterization Of The FTR Fading Model

In this section, the statistical properties of the FTR fading model are investigated. To this end, novel, analytical expressions for its PDF and CDF are derived for arbitrary values of its parameters.

### Ii-a An Overview of the FTR Fading Model

According to the FTR fading model, the complex baseband response of the wireless channel can be expressed as

(1) |

where is a Gamma distributed random variable with unit mean, and PDF given by

(2) |

Furthermore, and are constant amplitudes having specular components modulated by a Nakagami- random variable, denotes the imaginary term, and are uniformly distributed random phases, namely . The random phase of each dominant wave is assumed to be statistically independent. In addition, represents the diffuse component, which can be modeled as a complex Gaussian random variable as .

The FTR fading model can be conveniently expressed by introducing the parameters and , which are respectively defined as

(3) |

(4) |

where is the ratio of the average power of the dominant waves to the average power of the remaining diffuse multipath, in a similar fashion as the parameter in the Rician channel model. Moreover, varies from 0 to 1 and characterizes the relation between the powers of two dominant waves. When , the magnitudes of the two specular components are equal, e.g., . When , the FTR model reduces to a Rician shadowed fading model, including only one component, e.g., or . By using the definitions for , and , the FTR fading model encompasses the one-sided Gaussian, Rayleigh, Nakagami-, Rician, Rician shadowed and TWDP, as special cases.

### Ii-B New expressions for the PDF and CDF of the FTR fading model

The received average SNR, , undergoing a multipath fading channel as described in (1) is given by

(5) |

where is the energy density and denotes the expectation operator.

The PDF expression for the FTR fading power envelope can be obtained by over all possible realizations of the random variable , which follows a Gamma distribution as indicated in (2). It should be stressed that the PDF and CDF expressions presented in [7], are only valid for positive integer values of . In what follows, novel PDF and CDF expressions for the power envelope of the FTR fading model are derived, assuming arbitrary positive real values of .

###### Lemma 1

###### Proof:

Please see Appendix. \qed

In contrast to [7], the derived PDF and CDF expressions in Lemma 1 are more general and valid for arbitrary positive values of . Fig. 1 depicts the PDF derived in (6) for different arbitrary positive values of , and markers correspond to the simulation PDF based on (1). It is clear that the Monte Carlo simulations validate our derived result of PDF, and the difference of the PDF curves between considering and is pronounced.

### Ii-C KS Goodness-of-fit test

Herein, we investigate the validity of the proposed approximations by using the statistical tool and argument. Specifically, we employ the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) goodness-of-fit statistical test [11], which measures the maximum value of the absolute difference between the empirical CDF of the random variable , , and the analytical CDF of the random variable , . Hence, the KS test statistic is given by [11]

(10) |

Table I depicts the KS test statistic for different combinations of channel parameters , and , where is for the proposed approximation in this paper, and is for the approximation given in [7]. It should be noted that, for all considered cases in this paper, 40 terms have been used to converge the series. Without loss of generality, we assume that the average SNR . The exact results have been obtained by averaging at least samples of the FTR random variables. The critical value , is given by , which corresponds to a significance level of [11]. The hypothesis is accepted with . It is clearly illustrated in Table I that hypothesis is always accepted with significance for different combinations of parameters , and , as both and are smaller than . As opposed to [7], our derived approximations are valid for arbitrary positive values of parameters , which is practical in a real wireless scenario. More specifically, the hypothesis of the CDF expression (7) is also accepted for arbitrary positive values of . It should be noted that, for all cases considered in this paper, 40 terms have been used to converge the series and the truncation error is less than .

FTR Fading Parameters | ||
---|---|---|

=5.5, =15, =0.4 | 0.013339 | – |

=8.5, =5, =0.35 | 0.011112 | – |

=9.2, =3, =1 | 0.009313 | – |

=10, =10, =0.5 | 0.008867 | 0.008867 |

=15, =20, =0.2 | 0.005461 | 0.005461 |

=20, =5, =0.43 | 0.009404 | 0.009404 |

## Iii Performance Analysis

### Iii-a Channel Capacity

The average capacity per unit bandwidth is given by

(11) |

With the help of (11) and (6), we can obtain the capacity of the FTR channels.

###### Lemma 2

For arbitrary positive values of , the average FTR channel capacity per unit bandwidth can be obtained as

(12) |

where

### Iii-B Bit Error Rate

For a variety of modulation formats, the average BER is given by

(13) |

where is the conditional bit-error probability, which can be written as

(14) |

where is the upper incomplete Gamma function [10, Eq. (8.350.2)], and are modulation-specific parameters for binary modulation schemes, respectively. For example, for binary shift keying (BPSK), for coherent binary frequency shift keying, and for differential BPSK [12]. By substituting (6) and (14) into (13) and based on the definition of [13], (13) can be rewritten as

(15) |

With the help of (15) and (7), we can obtain the BER of the FTR fading channel in the following lemma.

###### Lemma 3

For arbitrary positive values of , the average BER of the FTR fading channel can be obtained as

(16) |

where

(17) |

where is the Gauss hypergeometric function [10, Eq. (9.14)].

###### Proof:

Note that the derived BER expression (16) is given in terms of Gauss hypergeometric functions, which can be easily evaluated and efficiently programmed in most standard software packages (e.g., Matlab, Maple and Mathematica). However, our exact analytical results provide limited physical insights, we now present an asymptotic and simple expression of the error rates for the high-SNR regime.

For the high-SNR regime, approaches to , resulting in the term approaches zero. Therefore, the term with is the maximum and we can remove other terms. After some simple manipulations, we obtain the average BER in the high-SNR regime for arbitrary positive values of as

(20) |

## Iv Numerical Results

In this section, some representative plots that illustrate the capacity and BER performance of FTR fading channels are presented, along with the Monte Carlo simulation by generating random realizations following the FTR distribution. Although some expressions presented herein are given in terms of infinite series, we only need use less than 40 terms to get a satisfactory accuracy (e.g., smaller than ) for all considered cases. In the following, without loss of generality, the transmit SNR is normalized to be 1.

Figs. 2-3 depict the analytical (12) and simulation channel capacity against the average SNR for different values of and . By varying one parameter while keeping other parameters fixed, we find that increasing the values of helps overcome the effect of the FTR channel fading. As expected, the capacity that corresponds to light fluctuations () is larger than the capacity that corresponds to heavy fluctuations (). Moreover, this increase is more pronounced for smaller values of . When , it is clear from Fig. 3.(a) that the capacity that corresponds to high power of the dominant waves () is larger than the capacity that corresponds to high power of the scattered waves (). For in Fig. 3.(b), however, the capacity increases as decreases, which is consistent with [8].

The simulation, exact and high-SNR approximation BER curves based on (16) and (III-B) are depicted in Figs. 4-5, respectively. We consider the BPSK modulation with modulation parameters and . Figs. 4-5 indicate that the analytical expressions coincide with the high-SNR approximation results when average SNR is high. It is clear from Fig. 4 that a large value of diminishes the effect of channel fluctuations, thereby delivering a smaller BER. We also note that the BER is a decreasing function of the parameter . With the increase of , the variance of the diffuse components decreases under the same average SNR, which results the BER for the case of is lower than that of .

## V Conclusion

In this paper, we derive new expressions for the PDF and CDF of the instantaneous SNR of the FTR fading channel by using a mixture of gamma distributions. Further, the analytical expression of capacity has been derived. We find that increasing the values of channel parameters and/or both help overcome the effects of fading. Moreover, we derived exact and asymptotic expressions of the BER for binary modulation schemes to get better insight into the implications of the model parameters on the BER performance. Our derived results extend the knowledge of the newly proposed FTR fading model, which shows its promising validation for the performance analysis of future wireless systems.

## Appendix

The PDF of the TWDP fading model can be expressed by a mixture of gamma distributions as [14, Eq. (6)]

(21) |

where is the modified Bessel function of the first kind [10, Eq. (8.445)] with the v-th order, is the PDF of the gamma distribution with the shape parameter ( j + 1) and scale parameter . In the FTR fading model, is a unit-mean Gamma distributed random variable with the PDF expression (2). From (2) and (Appendix), we can obtain the PDF of the FTR channel as

(22) |

With the help of [15, Eq. (2.15.3.2)], we can derive the last term as

(23) |

Recall that the definition of the CDF is given by , where represents the probability. With the help of [10, Eq. (3.351.1)] and , the CDF expression can be derived as

(24) |

## References

- [1] F. Boccardi, R. W. Heath, A. Lozano, and T. L. Marzetta, “Five disruptive technology directions for 5G,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 74–80, Feb. 2013.
- [2] V. W. Wong, R. Schober, D. W. K. Ng, and L.-C. Wang, Key Technologies for 5G Wireless Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- [3] T. S. Rappaport, G. R. Maccartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Sun, “Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, Sep. 2015.
- [4] M. Peng, Y. Li, T. Q. S. Quek, and C. Wang, “Device-to-device underlaid cellular networks under Rician fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4247–4259, Aug. 2014.
- [5] S. L. Cotton, “Human body shadowing in cellular device-to-device communications: Channel modeling using the shadowed fading model,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 111–119, Jan. 2015.
- [6] S. K. Yoo, S. L. Cotton, P. C. Sofotasios, and S. Freear, “Shadowed fading in indoor off-body communication channels: A statistical characterization using the -/gamma composite fading model,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 5231–5244, Aug. 2016.
- [7] J. M. Romero-Jerez, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, J. F. Paris, and A. J. Goldsmith, “The fluctuating two-ray fading model: Statistical characterization and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4420–4432, Jul. 2017.
- [8] M. Rao, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, M. S. Alouini, and A. Goldsmith, “MGF approach to the analysis of generalized two-ray fading models,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2548–2561, May. 2015.
- [9] M. K. Samimi, G. R. MacCartney, S. Sun, and T. S. Rappaport, “28 Ghz millimeter-wave ultrawideband small-scale fading models in wireless channels,” in Proc. IEEE 83rd VTC, 2016, pp. 1–6.
- [10] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed. New York: Academic, 1980.
- [11] A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
- [12] I. Trigui, A. Laourine, S. Affes, and A. Phenne, “Performance analysis of mobile radio systems over composite fading/shadowing channels with co-located interference,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3448–3453, Aug. 2009.
- [13] J. Zhang, M. Matthaiou, Z. Tan, and H. Wang, “Performance analysis of digital communication systems over composite -/gamma fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3114–3124, Jul. 2012.
- [14] N. Y. Ermolova, “Capacity analysis of two-wave with diffuse power fading channels using a mixture of gamma distributions,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2245–2248, Nov. 2016.
- [15] A. P. Prudnikov, I. U. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series, Volume 2: Special Functions. Gordon and Breach, 1986.