1 Introduction

SLAC-PUB-13408

BABAR-PROC-08/066

September, 2008

New Physics Searches at B AB AR

F. Renga

Università di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma

(for the BABAR Collaboration)

Abstract

We will present the most recent results from the BABAR Collaboration concerning New Physics searches in rare and Lepton Flavour Violating (LFV) decays, including transitions, purely leptonic decays and LFV decays.

Presented at the 16th International Conference On Supersymmetry And The Unification Of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY08)

06/16/2008—06/21/2008, Seoul, Korea

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309

Work supported in part by Department of Energy contract DE-AC02-76SF00515.

## 1 Introduction

Rare and decays are a standard probe for New Physics (NP) searches and a -Factory provides a unique environment to look for these processes. Many rare decays can be investigated and are sensitive to different NP scenarios.

At first, we can consider decays mediated by flavour-changing neutral currents (FCNC). They are characterized by low rates in the Standard Model (SM), due to the absence of FCNC at tree level. Hence, NP effects can be of the same order of magnitude of the SM contributions. The high number of pairs produced by a -Factory often allows to approach or reach the experimental sensitivity needed to observe these decays, and strong constraints can be put on the NP contributions, by comparing the experimental results with the SM expectations.

We can also consider purely leptonic decays and LFV decays. The very low SM rate of these decays often make them unaccessible with the present experiments, unless NP effects enhance the rate up to the current experimental sensitivity. For some of these decays, just the observation by itself would provide an unambiguous evidence of NP.

In this work, we present the most recent NP searches in rare and decays, based on the data collected by the BABAR detector NIM () at PEP-II, an asymmetric collider operating at a center of mass energy of 10.58 , corresponding to the mass of the resonance.

## 2 Electroweak Penguins

The FCNC decays proceeding through electroweak penguin diagrams show a good sensitivity to supersymmetric models and other NP scenarios.

Among them, the process has been deeply investigated both from the theoretical and experimental point of view in the last years. A SM estimate of the inclusive branching ratio (BR) is available at the NNLO misiak ():

 B(B→Xsγ)=(3.15±0.23)×10−4. (1)

The CP asymmetry:

 ACP=Γ(¯¯¯¯B→Xsγ)−Γ(B→X¯sγ)Γ(¯¯¯¯B→Xsγ)+Γ(B→X¯sγ), (2)

is also interesting, since it is expected to be at the level of 0.5% in the SM but can be strongly enhanced by NP effects hurth ().

The BABAR Collaboration produced several results for the inclusive BR, adopting different techniques. The most stringent measurement, based on a sample of about pairs, has been done by means of a semi-inclusive approach babar_Xsgamma_semi () and gives:

 B(B→Xsγ)=(3.27±0.18+0.55−0.41)×10−4, (3)

where (here and in the following) the first error is statistical, the second is systematic. In this analysis, 38 exclusive final states are reconstructed (22 modes with 1 kaon and 1 to 4 pions, 10 modes with a kaon, an and up to 2 pions, 6 modes with 1 kaon and up to 1 pion). The signal yields are combined in order to extract the inclusive BR. The error is dominated by the systematic uncertainty coming from the modeling of the parton fragmentation and the contribution from unreconstructed modes. A similar technique has been used in order to measure the CP asymmetry, obtaining:

 ACP=−0.011±0.030±0.014, (4)

in a sample of about pairs babar_Xsll_ACP ().

Recently, the Collaboration produced a new result for the BR, based on a recoil technique babar_Xsgamma_reco (). In this kind of analysis, one of the two () is reconstructed in a frequent decay mode, while the signal signature is searched for in the rest of the event (the recoil), composed by all tracks and neutral particles not associated to the . This technique provides a pure sample of events and a clean environment to look for rare decays.

The BR is measured on the recoil of hadronic decays. More than 1000 exclusive decay modes are used. The kinematical consistency of the is checked with the two variables and , where is the beam energy and and are the energy and the momentum of the in the center of mass frame.

A photon with energy is required on the recoil. Finally, the signal yield is extracted by means of a Maximum Likelihood (ML) fit, based on the distribution of . The BR measured from a sample of about is:

 B(B→Xsγ)=(3.66±0.85±60)×10−4. (5)

The fit is also performed in different bins of in order to measure the photon energy spectrum. The results are shown in Fig. 1.

The FCNC decays are also mediated by electroweak penguin diagrams, along with electroweak box diagrams. These processes are mainly sensitive to non-standard couplings BHI (). Moreover, since the two neutrinos in the decays are not detected, the experimental search is also sensitive to some exotic sources of missing energy, like light dark matter bird () and Unparticles aliev ().

The BaBar Collaboration measured the inclusive BR by means of a semi-inclusive approach, by looking for exclusive modes with 1 kaon and up to 3 pions babar_Xsll_semi (). The result is:

 B(B→Xsℓ+ℓ−)=(5.6±1.5±1.3)×10−6, (6)

and is consistent with the SM expectations. Also in this case, large systematic uncertainties are present due to the fragmentation modeling.

Measurements concerning the exclusive decays have been recently updated babar_Kll_excl (). Exclusive BR measurements need to be compared with unclean theoretical expectations, due to the presence of large long distance contributions Vll (). Anyway, it is possible to measure some interesting rate asymmetry that are sensitive to NP effects exclusive (), with part of the theoretical uncertainties canceling when taking the ratios. The most important one is the forward-backward asymmetry. A preliminary result by the BABAR Collaboration, from a sample of about pairs, is quoted in Tab. 1 for two different ranges of the dilepton invariant mass .

Concerning the BRs, the Collaboration recently presented an update of the search for the mode and the first preliminary BABAR search for the modes. They are performed by means of a recoil technique, using semileptonic decays for the reconstruction. Then a is looked for in the recoil, requiring that no extra track is present.

Since NP effects can strongly affect the kinematics of the decay, for the first time this search has been performed by using only the variables that are not correlated to the assumed kinematical model.

In the analysis, the signal yield is extracted with a counting technique, after a multivariate selection based on the random forest algorithm ranfor (). In the search the yield is extracted by means of a fit to the distribution of , defined as the sum of the energies of the neutral particles not associated either to the or the signal .

The following upper limits at 90% confidence level (CL) have been set:

 B(B+→K+ν¯¯¯ν) < 4.2×10−5, (7) B(B0→K∗0ν¯¯¯ν) < 18×10−5, (8) B(B+→K∗+ν¯¯¯ν) < 9×10−5. (9)

based on about (for ) and (for ) pairs. These ULs are about a factor 10 above the expected SM values.

## 3 Leptonic B decays

Purely leptonic decays occur in the SM through annihilation diagrams, and hence are highly suppressed. According to the SM, the only among them that is accessible at the present -Factories is the decay, whose BR is expected to be at the level of . On the other hand, enhancements are possible in some NP scenarios.

The most recent BABAR measurements for have been performed in the recoil of both hadronic and semileptonic decays babar_taunu (). The decay modes used in these analyses are both leptonic and hadronic. The measured BR is:

 B(B+→τ+ν) = (0.9±0.6±0.1) (10) B(B+→τ+ν) = (1.8+0.9−0.8±0.4) (11)

for the semileptonic and hadronic analysis respectively, based on pairs. They are in agreement with the expected SM values.

The BABAR Collaboration also performed searches for the decays, where the , , , and combinations are considered. If there is no in the final , state, a full reconstruction is performed and the signal yield is extracted with a ML fit to the distributions of and . If a is present, a hadronic recoil technique is adopted and the momentum of the other lepton is fitted in order to extract the signal yield. The following ULs at 90% CL are set:

 B(B0→e+e−)<11.3×10−8 (12) B(B0→μ+μ−)<5.2×10−8 (13) B(B0→e+μ−)<9.2×10−8 (14) B(B0→e+τ−)<2.8×10−5 (15) B(B0→μ+τ−)<2.2×10−5 (16)

## 4 Lfv τ decays

The decays of the lepton can be studied at BABAR thanks to the high cross section at 10.58 (). The most recent measurements published by the Collaboration for the LFV decays concern  babar_lomega () and  babar_lll (). These decays are expected to be unaccessible in the SM hypothesis but they can be enhanced and reach the level in some supersymmetric scenario.

These analyses are performed by looking for a 1–3 topology: the event is divided in two hemispheres and only one track (assumed to come from a leptonic decay) is searched for in one hemisphere, while three tracks (the signal signature) are searched for in the opposite hemisphere. Then, two kinematical variables, the missing energy and the beam energy constrained mass , are used to define a signal region. Finally, the observed events in the signal region are compared to the expected yields extracted from MC simulations. The following ULs are set:

 B(τ+→e+ω)<10×10−8 (17) B(τ+→μ+ω)<11×10−8 (18) B(τ+→e+e−e+)<10×10−8 (19) B(τ+→μ+e−e+)<11×10−8 (20) B(τ+→μ−e+e+)<10×10−8 (21) B(τ+→e−μ+μ+)<11×10−8 (22) B(τ+→e+μ−μ+)<10×10−8 (23) B(τ+→μ+μ−μ+)<11×10−8 (24)

## References

• (1) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 479 (2002) 1
• (2) S. Agostinelli et al. [GEANT4 Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250.
• (3) M. Misiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002
• (4) T. Hurth, E. Lunghi and W. Porod, Nucl. Phys. B 704 (2005) 56
• (5) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 052004
• (6) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 051103
• (7) G. Buchalla, G. Hiller and G. Isidori, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 014015.
• (8) C. Bird, P. Jackson, R. Kowalewski and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201803.
• (9) T. M. Aliev, A. S. Cornell and N. Gaur, JHEP 0707 (2007) 072
• (10) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 081802
• (11) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], arXiv:0805.4796 [hep-ex].
• (12) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], arXiv:0807.4119 [hep-ex].
• (13) M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Nucl. Phys. B 612 (2001) 25
• (14) T. Feldmann and J. Matias, JHEP 0301 (2003) 074 C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, JHEP 0807 (2008) 106
• (15) L. Breiman, Machine Learning 45, 5-32 (2001).
• (16) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 052002 B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 011107
• (17) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 071802
• (18) B. Aubert et al. [BABAR Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 251803
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters