Neutrinos Angra experiment: commissioning and first operational measurements

Neutrinos Angra experiment: commissioning and first operational measurements

Abstract

The Neutrinos Angra Experiment has completed a major step by finishing the comissioning of the detector and the data acquisition system at the experimental site located in the Angra dos Reis nuclear power plant. The experiment consists of a water-based detector and associated electronics, both designed with the goal of detecting the electron antineutrinos produced by the nuclear reactor. The detection is possible due to the Inverse Beta Decay, where the final products in the water are photons in the UV-to-visible range of the spectrum. The assembled detector comprises three active volumes filled with water: (i) a cubic target detector for electron antineutrinos, covered by 32 8-inches PMTs, (ii) a lateral layer surrounding the target (veto) equipped with 4 PMTs and (iii) a third volume covering the top of both, also equipped with 4 PMTs. In the present document the main features of the detector assembly as well as the integration of the readout electronics on-site are reported. Finally, some operational characteristics are shown based on straightforward analysis of the first measurements performed during the last months with the fully working detector.

d]J. A. M. Alfonzo, b]J. C. Anjos, b]G. Cernicchiaro, c]P. Chimenti, a]I. A. Costa, a]M. P. Dias, d]P. C. M. A. Farias, a]A. Fernandes Junior, e]G. P. Guedes, f]L. F. G. Gonzalez, f]E. Kemp, b,1]H. P. Lima Jr \noteCorresponding author., a]G. S. Lopes, d]J. Marcelo, a]M. L. Migliorini, a]R. A. Nóbrega, d]I. M. Pepe, d]D. B. S. Ribeiro, a]D. M. Souza, d]L. R. Teixeira, \affiliation[a]Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil \affiliation[b]Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil \affiliation[c]Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, SC, Brazil \affiliation[d]Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil \affiliation[e]Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil \affiliation[f]Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil \emailAddhlima@cbpf.br \keywordsNeutrino detector, comissioning, readout electronics, data analysis.

1 Introduction

Nuclear reactors have been crucial to experimental neutrino physics as they are copious man-made sources of neutrinos. In addition to having made possible the confirmation of the neutrino hypothesis in 1956 [1], other experiments have been built since then inside such facilities. In the past decades, experiments like Palo Verde [2], CHOOZ [3], Daya Bay [4], Double Chooz [5] and RENO [6], to name a few, considerably increased the knowledge on the neutrino oscillation phenomenon by the precise measurements of the mixing angle .

The neutrino emission from nuclear reactors is closely related to the fission of heavy nuclei taking place inside the reactor: each fission contributes with a well-known fraction of the total released energy and is followed by the emission of neutrinos. By using a neutrino detector to monitor the flux, one can estimate the fission’s rate and thus the energy released by the reactor, i.e., the neutrino flux is directly proportional to the power of the reactor.

The proposal to use neutrinos for remote monitoring of the thermal power of nuclear reactors was first considered in the mid-1970s [7, 8]. One of the first demonstration experiments was performed in a laboratory of neutrinos placed in the nuclear power plant at Rovno - Ukraine. It was clearly shown the relationship between neutrino counting rate and the reactor activity, so the neutrino radiation could be, in principle, used for such purposes [9, 10].

This scenario described above opens up solid perspectives for the use of neutrinos as reliable probes of the physical processes in which they participate. Thus, a neutrino detector can monitor parameters related to the activity of nuclear reactors that are crucial for checking items of the non-proliferation safeguards dictated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [11].

An important point in the using of neutrino detectors for nuclear monitoring, especially regarding the verification of safeguards, is the possibility to remotely check the reactor activity, avoiding the need for operation and intrusion in the containment area or other restricted access areas in the nuclear power plant.

A neutrino experiment at the Brazilian nuclear power plant in Angra dos Reis was initially considered for studies of neutrino oscillations [12]. After a major reconfiguration in a worldwide scale of the groups willing to carry out this kind of experiment around the three proposals that would be effectively implemented (Double Chooz, RENO and Daya Bay), the Brazilian group decided that there was a great opportunity to perform an experiment in the premises of the plant, even if of smaller dimensions and with another objective, in this case the verification of non-proliferation safeguards. This is the origin of the Neutrinos Angra (-Angra) experiment, discussed in this paper.

A common challenge for all neutrino experiments, using reactors or not, is the background radiation - mainly neutrons and cosmic muons - that can mimic signals with similar features of those expected from the neutrino detection. In order to suppress the background level, the usual solution is to install the detectors in large underground cavities [3] [5] using the rock and soil overburden as a natural shield. Several measurements have shown that the vertical muons intensity can be reduced times for depth of rock [13]. Achieving a Signal-To-Noise Ratio (signals produced by neutrinos against neutrino-like signals caused by other particles) high enough in order to make possible to monitor the burning process of nuclear reactors is the the main challenge (if not the biggest) for the -Angra experiment, since the detector is assembled on the surface, one of the points of the agreement with the plant operator to conduct the research inside the Angra dos Reis nuclear complex. In order to handle with the background, the main tools that will be used are: a cosmic rays VETO system surrounding the outermost part of the detector target volume, and discrimination techniques in data analysis based on the measurements of time and energy of events.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the commissioning of the experiment, which started in September 2017 and finished in the second half of 2018. The paper is organized as follows: section 2 provides an overview of the whole detector - including the neutrino TARGET and the two VETO volumes - and the Readout Electronics (RE) developed to readout and storage of the signals; in section 3 is reported the detector assembling procedure in the nuclear reactor site; section 4 covers a brief description of the RE, its installation in the site and the initial tests; the first measurements, and respective data analysis, with the full detector and readout electronics in operation are presented in section 5. Finally, conclusions and perspectives close the paper in section 6.

2 The -Angra Detector and the Readout Electronics

2.1 Detector Overview

The -Angra experiment intends to develop a system, based on a Cherenkov detector, capable of measuring antineutrino flux emitted by reactors. The Angra dos Reis nuclear site (which houses a 3764 MW power reactor named Angra II) is being used to assess the proposed technology. With the reactor in steady-state operation, the neutrino flux produced by that unit is estimated as [14]. The electron antineutrino flux can be used to perform a non-invasive monitoring of the reactor activity as well as to estimate the thermal power produced at the reactor core. For the 1 ton Target detector, the expected rate is around 5000 events per day for a distance of 25 m from the reactor core, enabling the experiment to investigate the potential of antineutrino detection for safeguards applications. The antineutrino interactions are from inverse decays taking place inside the Target detector, a cubic volume filled with 1340.28 l of doped water (0.2 %). The water volume is contained by a 0.90 m1.46 m1.02 m (height-length-width) plastic tank surrounded by 32 eight-inch photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), type Hamamatsu R5912 [18], being 16 installed on the bottom and 16 on the top of the volume, as it is shown in figure 1. The six internal faces of the target volume are covered by sheets of a diffuse reflector membrane (0.5 mm DRP), which provides reflectance greater than 99.0 % for 400 nm wavelength light.


Figure 1: Exploded view of the -Angra detector.

The vessel on the top of figure 1 is the Top VETO detector, designed to detect and generate a trigger pulse whenever a cosmic muon crosses the volume. Four PMTs, of the same model as the one in the Target detector, are fixed on the middle of each side, pointing to the center of its volume. The Top VETO tank is filled with pure water, has dimensions 0.28 m2.66 m2.02 m (h-l-w) and has all the internal faces covered with the Tyvek reflector material (providing reflectance greater than 97.0 %). Surrounding the Target detector, there is a first water layer with 12.00 cm thickness. In this part of the detector - called here the Lateral VETO - there are four PMTs fixed in the middle of each side on the top with the photocadode pointing to the bottom. The Lateral VETO corresponds to the third part - from top to bottom - in figure 1. The Top and the Lateral VETO layers, covered in total by eight photomultipliers, plus a dedicated circuitry form the VETO system, which is responsible for detecting cosmic ray particles that might hit the Target detector volume. Whenever two or more PMTs fire at the same time, a veto window is generated blocking any trigger signal that could eventually be generated due to hits in the Target detector.

Finally, the outermost part of the detector, which surrounds the VETO Lateral, is 14.50 cm thick on two opposite sides and 22.5 cm on the other two sides. It is completely filled with pure water and used as shield against background neutrons.

2.2 Readout Electronics

Besides the detector itself, a complete data acquisition system has been designed and integrated for the experiment in order to perform tasks, such as: biasing of the PMTs (High Voltage power supply), amplification of PMT output signals (Front-End electronics), sampling and digitization of the signals (NDAQ electronics), online events selection (Trigger system) and local data storage (commercial Network Attached Storage). An overview of the Readout Electronics with those systems is the diagram shown in figure 2.


Figure 2: Overview of the Readout Electronics installed on the nuclear power plant.

The high voltage system and the local computing infrastructure - DAQ (Data Acquisition System) servers and local data storage - are commercial off-the-shelf parts in the readout electronics. The High Voltage Power Supply used to bias the 40 PMTs is a commercial mainframe-based system from CAEN. It is composed of one SY4527 mainframe housing two units of the A1535SP 24-channel positive voltage module with SHV-type output connectors. The HV system is remotely controlled through ethernet connection and a simple terminal-style user interface. The local data storage is a network attached storage unit, model TS-431P (QNAP), assembled with four 4 TB disks. Data read from the detector is continuosly written to those disks and posteriorly transferred to two larger and permanent data servers: the primary one installed at CBPF, in Rio de Janeiro, and a mirror server installed at Unicamp, in Campinas.

Front-end electronics

In order to condition the PMTs output signals to the digitizing electronics (NDAQ modules), and to inform which channels have been fired to the trigger system, a custom front-end circuitry has been developed [15]. The front-end sensitivity was measured to be 71.5 0.9 mV (output signal peak value) per photoelectron and it starts saturating after achieving an output peak amplitude of 1.4 Volts; therefore each channel can process up to about 20 photoelectrons without linearity loss. Five front-end boards (FEB) are used in the experiment, each one with eight independent channels. A channel is composed of a four-stage amplification/shaper circuit, a discriminator circuit and a control system. The former prepares the signal to the digitizer, the output of the second is delivered to the trigger system and the latter allows remotely adjustment of the offset of the analog signal and the threshold of the discriminator circuit according to the experiment requirements. Therefore, as shown in figure 3, each channel offers two output signals: an analog (ASIG) and a discriminated (DSIG) signal.


Figure 3: Front-end electronics channel.

The control system, also shown in figure 3, is based on an controllable DAC chip (AD5665), placed on the FEB, and a single-board computer (Raspberry Pi) connected to the network to allow accessing all the DAC (Digital-to-Analog Converter) chips remotely. To access all the FEBs, a multiplexer (TCA9548A) is used. Each DAC provides four output voltages (only two of them are shown in figure 3 for simplification) and, therefore, to control all the eight offset and eight threshold levels of a FEB, four DAC chips are used per board. All boards’ functionalities and channels were tested and calibrated in laboratory before installing the boards in the experiment container. Once they were installed in the nuclear site, all the thresholds were calibrated to produce a discriminator output rate between 500 and 3000 pulses per second for each channel.

Digitizer

The detector signals, amplified and shaped by the front-end electronics, are sent to a VME-based system able to sample and digitize the signals whenever it receives a trigger pulse. The system is composed of a commercial single board computer module, model MVME3100 (Artesyn Embedded Technologies), a commercial Fan-In Fan-Out module, model V976 (CAEN), and five NDAQ modules, specifically designed for the experiment [16]. The single board computer works as the readout processor of the digitizer cards. It hosts and executes a C language program that control and read, during data taking, the NDAQ cards installed on the mainframe. The fan-in fan-out module is used to distribut the digital trigger pulse coming from the Trigger system to the five NDAQ modules.


Figure 4: NDAQ data acquisition module design.

Each NDAQ module has eight ADC (Analog-to-Digital Converter) channels working at 125 MHz sampling rate with 10 bits vertical resolution, as shown in figure 4. The ADC output samples are sent to an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), where a circuit based on two FIFO memories connected in series is programmed. This approach is used in order to flush and store pulse samples before and after the rising edge of the trigger pulse, otherwise only samples after the trigger instant would be read. It is worth noting that typical pulses coming out of the photomultiplier tubes feature spectral content up to 160 MHz, at the point where the spectrum falls -20 dB. After the front-end electronics, the signal bandwidth falls to less than 50 MHz and therefore can be properly discretized at 125 samples per second.

Trigger

In the occurrence of an event, the front-end output signals are digitized by the NDAQ modules and sent to on-board FIFO memories awaiting for a trigger decision. If the event is selected by the Trigger System [17], shown in figure 5, the corresponding data is transferred to the experiment data storage unit for future analysis. For a fast trigger decision, the selection algorithm was developed to be implemented in a dedicated FPGA. For remote configuration and upgrade of its firmware, a RaspberryPI card with Ethernet connection has been integrated to the FPGA circuit.

The Trigger board receives as input the 40 discriminated signals from the discriminator section of the Front-end modules: 32 signals from the Target detector PMTs, 4 from the Lateral Veto and 4 from the Top Veto. Two output connectors deliver the results of the trigger logic processing: the overall Trigger L1 signal, a high level pulse that indicates whenever a minimum of PMT units have been fired at the same time window, and the Veto signal, which informs that a veto condition was found. The Veto condition, as the name suggests, blocks any Trigger L1 pulse during a short period (currently set to 2.5 s) after the rising edge of the Veto signal.


Figure 5: Trigger electronics overview.

In the current design, the Trigger L1 condition is based only on multiplicity, which means that the Trigger L1 pulse is active whenever a minimum number of PMTs are fired in the Target detector inside a predefined time window. The same concept applies to the Veto system.

A number of configuration registers that define the Trigger functionalities are available and can be remotely configured. The values of those registers are defined in a text file stored in the RaspberryPI control card. In order to perform any change on the registers, one only needs to edit that file. A list of the most relevant registers are given below::

  • minimum number of PMTs fired in the Target detector to generate a Trigger L1 pulse;

  • minimum number of PMTs fired in the Lateral veto to generate a Veto condition;

  • minimum number of PMTs fired in the Top veto to generate a Veto condition;

  • time window length to accept Target PMTs discriminated pulses;

  • time window length for blocking Trigger L1 pulses in a Veto condition;

  • blocking mask for each PMT channel in the whole detector (40 bits).

3 Assembling at the Experimental Site

3.1 Detector Assembling

The final assembly of the detector was planned to be done just outside of its final position, the naval container of the project, located 2 m away from the wall of the nuclear reactor building. After an analysis of the best course of action to be taken, it was decided to prepare the Top veto first, due to its relative simplicity when compared to the Target detector tank; then the Target, and finally the Lateral veto were mounted in that order because the latter needed the target inside it to be instrumented. All volumes were already internally coated with Tyvek prior to the transportation to the nuclear reactor site in order to facilitate the assembly.

The Top veto was instrumented with 4 PMTs and a calibration LED. To equip the Target detector, it was laid sideways so that two researchers could enter and fit in the 16 bottom PMTs along with 6 calibration LEDs, as shown in figure 6. Finally the Target detector tank was carefully brought to its standard position and externally coated with Tyvek. Its lid was lifted and the 16 top PMTs and 6 LEDs were placed. Figure 7 shows the Target detector lid fully instrumented just before lowering it down to its final position.


Figure 6: Bottom of the Target detector being instrumented in the nuclear power plant.

Figure 7: Target detector lid with the 16 PMTs and 6 LEDs installed.

With help of the nuclear power plant personnel, the Target, now complete, was lifted and placed inside the Lateral veto volume. The 4 PMTs of the Lateral veto were mounted on its main cover plates, upside down. The main plates were covered with secondary plastic plates and a canvas to block light leakage.

The Top veto was lifted and placed upon the Lateral veto tank. To finish the detector assembling, another canvas was placed on top of the detector and it was moved inside the container.

The filling with water started by the Target volume, in which was pumped 1.7 m of Gd doped water. Then, the filling of the Lateral veto tank was done, with 1.6 m of pure water in the active volume and 3 m in the surrounding external volume. Finally, the Top veto was filled with 1.4 m of pure water as well.

3.2 DAQ Installation Campaigns

The complete installation of the readout electronics and the computing infrastructure in the project’s container happened in three short-time campaigns, each one consisting of one or two visits to the nuclear site. In each subsequent campaign new elements were added to the DAQ system and a few necessary modifications on the software and firmware level were done. Consequently, after each comissioning campaign the operational conditions of the DAQ were slightly changed.

In the first campaign, a simple DAQ was installed consisting of: one local server, the Front-end electronics (5 modules 8 channels), the NDAQ digitizers (5 modules 8 channels), the Trigger and the HV Power Supply systems, as shown in figure 2. Unfortunately, during the mission it was noticed that one of the 5 NDAQ modules was not accessible by the VME single board computer, which means that only 32 channels were effectively operational. A second issue also detected was that the Trigger system was not taking into account the VETO signals to reject cosmic muons crossing the Top VETO detector. That problem had a major impact on the overall trigger rate of the detector, keeping it around 1 kHz, well above the expected rate. To generate a trigger pulse, coincident signals were required on at least four PMTs on the target detector in a fixed time window.. It was also found that the NDAQ modules could not handle such high trigger rate. Therefore, at the end of the first campaign, the experiment was not ready to acquire data continuously; only short time runs were performed for debugging.

During the second DAQ installation campaign, some software and hardware modifications have been done. There was no inclusion of new hardware. At the end, even with the Top VETO signals still not acting on the Trigger system as they were supposed to, the DAQ system was able to run with certain stability at 1 kHz trigger rate. From this campaign on, the experiment started to collect data through short-time RUNs of few minutes due to the high trigger rate.

In the last campaign, the first complete version of the DAQ system was achieved after three important actions: (i) new infrastructure equipments were installed, (ii) a revised and corrected version of the Trigger firmware was configured and (iii) major fixes on the readout software were implemented. The new equipments included a high-power (3 kVA) UPS tower to provide stable AC power supply for all the DAQ elements, a commercial data storage unit with 16 TB capacity, and a RaspberryPI-based electronics to allow remote configuration of the Front-end parameters - offset and threshold. After update of the Trigger firmware, the veto logic started to work properly. Whenever two or more PMT hits occur at the same time window, any trigger pulse is blocked during the programmed time window. Finally, with the VETO working as required, the overall trigger rate decreased to 150 Hz (under the condition of at least four PMT hits in the Target detector). A picture of the rack containing all the DAQ subsystems is shown in figure 8. From top to bottom, one can see: (i) the VME crate containing the Single Board Computer, the NDAQ digitizers and the fanout modules, (ii) the NIM crate with the Front-end electronics and the Trigger module and (iii) the HV power supply subsystem.


Figure 8: Data Acquisition electronics installed at the laboratory container located in the nuclear plant.

4 Preliminary Measurements and Data Analysis

Several experimental tests with the detector have been carried out during the commissioning campaigns in the nuclear facility, with the DAQ partially and fully installed. In the next paragraphs only the most relevant measurements, demonstrating its functionality and performance, will be described along with the achieved results.

The first test of the electronics was validate the non-saturated charge region of the DAQ. This test is independent of the trigger system, depending only on the PMTs, High-Voltage system and Front-End gain. We defined as saturated any pulse with at least 2 samples with the ADC saturated (using 8-bit configuration). The result can be seen in the figure 9 where each grey point represents the mean charge which n-PMTs are saturated (shown in percent) and the solid line is a logistic curve fit. Although there is no precise calibration available during this commissioning phase, the inverse beta decay positrons and neutrons are expected to be detected with less than DUQ (digital unity of charge). The charge unity used during the commissioning phase, DUQ, is calculated as the sum of the digital value of the ADCs samples.


Figure 9: DAQ Electronics Saturation curve.

The first physics result obtained after several weeks of detector operational was the spectrum of particles (mostly muons) crossing and loosing energy in the Target detector. Since the correction of the muon veto firmware was a drastic change in the way the detector was working, in figure 10 two spectra are shown, one for events before the firmware correction and the other after the correction. It is clear to notice that a bump between 75000 and 10000 DUQ units disappears for the events acquired with the veto working, as expected due to the removal of most of vertical muons from the data. Those events are simply rejected by the veto system.


Figure 10: Charge Spectrum obtained with no cuts on the Target detector.

A useful measurement to check and monitor the detector operation in the long run is the stability of the bump region amplitude: the high energy region dominated by crossing muons. Although this region is heavily saturated (more than 80% according to figure 9), the saturation effect shouldn’t change over time, ensuring the use of this feature as a stability check. This result is presented in figure 11 for periods after each commissioning campaigns. In the last group of measurements, more recent weeks, the mean reconstructed amplitude is reduced, as expected, since the veto system is in action.


Figure 11: Relative amplitude of the muon peak (region showed between and on plot 10).

Trigger rate was also analyzed in this same context. In figure 12 is possible to see that the rate changes after each commissioning campaign, but between each of them the rate behavior remained stable. For the two first groups of measurements it should be emphasized that the veto system was not working. That is the reason for the higher mean value, close to 1 kHz, when compared to the last group (starting in 2018-09). The small increase in the rate from the first to the second group may be explained by the adjustments done on the Front-end thresholds during the second DAQ installation campaign. Some channels on the Target detector were operating with threshold values higher than necessary. After the decrease of the threshold on those channels, it was expected to observe an increase in the individual trigger rate and, consequently, an increase in the overall trigger rate. After the last commissioning campaign, the overall trigger rate got stable around a mean value of 170 Hz. The rate of muons crossing the VETO detector is also monitored by the Readout Electronics and fluctuates around a mean value of 1 kHz.


Figure 12: Trigger rate stability after each commissioning campaign.

The distribution of time intervals between events in the Target detector is shown in figure 13. In the range of tens of microseconds, there are three main different phenomena: neutron capture in the Gd, muon decay and random coincidences. In the plot of figure 13 two exponential curves were adjusted to fit the phenomena: the random coincidence was fixed from a fit with larger temporal scale. With these fitting results, it was possible to compute: (i) the event rate (from the background time constant), (ii) the mean time of Gd neutron capture (that is proportional to the amount of Gd in the Target detector water) and (iii) the mean lifetime of muons (an ensemble of positive and negative muons). The fitting result can be seen on table 1.


Figure 13: Time between events in the Target detector.
Time Constant (ns) Fit Error (ns)
Neutron Capture 12700 80
Muon decay 2015 4
Backgroud
Table 1: Fitting results from data acquired on last commissioning period.

A selection of stopping muon candidates was made using events with charge between and DUQ and time coincidence less than . A selection of background was made using a time coincidence between and . After background exclusion, the charge of the second event of the coincidence can be plot as the Michel Electron Candidates charge spectrum, as shown in figure 14. One should note that this plot has negative values in the low energy limit due to the background exclusion, which, as expected, is more dominated by background on this selection. The lack of sharpness on the end of Michel Electron Candidates spectrum can be explained by the saturation of about expected in this charge region, combined with the finite size of the detector, that is not a perfect calorimeter for depositions based on multiple Compton scattering.


Figure 14: Michel electrons candidates.

5 Conclusions

The main aspects of the Neutrinos Angra detection system and its full commissioning were reported, with the description of the different tasks accomplished and the preliminary measurements achieved with the detector fully operational. First, the detector was fully assembled in the laboratory container located a few meters from the nuclear reactor protection. In a second moment, after three campaigns that had last for a few months, the Data Acquisition system was fully installed, tested and put into operation. As the preliminary measurements presented confirm, the experiment is fully operational, the detector is working as expected and the DAQ is continuously taking data for further more precise analysis towards the detection and identification of neutrinos.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications (MCTIC), FINEP and CNPq.

References

  1. C. Cowan et al., Detection of the free neutrino: a confirmation, Science 124 (1956) 3212
  2. F. Boehm et al., Search for neutrino oscillations at the Palo Verde Nuclear Reactors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3764.
  3. M. Apollonio et al., Limits on neutrino oscillations from the CHOOZ experiment, Phys. Lett. B 466 (1999) 415.
  4. F. P. An et al., Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803.
  5. Y. Abe et al., Indication of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131801.
  6. J. K. Ahn et al., Observation of reactor electron antineutrinos disappearance in the RENO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191802.
  7. L. Mikaelian, Neutrino laboratory in the atomic plant. Preceedings of the International Conference "Neutrino 77" 2 (1978) 383.
  8. A. Borovoi, L. Mikaelian, Possibilities of practical applications of neutrinos. At. Énerg, 44, 6 (1978) 508.
  9. V. Korovkin, A. Kodanev, D. Yarichin et al., Measurement of nuclear fuel burnup in a reactor according to neutrino emmission. At. Énerg, 56, 4 (1984) 214.
  10. V. Korovkin, A. Kodanev, Panashchenko et al., Measurement of power generation of a power reactor by the method of neutrino detection. At. Énerg, 65, 3 (1988) 169.
  11. N. S. Bowden, Reactor monitoring and safeguards using antineutrino detectors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2, 136 (2008) 022008.
  12. J. C. Anjos, A. F. Barbosa, R. Z. Funchal et el., Angra neutrino project: Status and plans. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 155 (2006 ) 231
  13. P. K. F. Grieder, Cosmic Rays at Earth - Researcher’s Reference Manual and Data Book, Elsevier Science (2001).
  14. A. Aguillar-Arevalo et al., Results of the engineering run of the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE), JINST 11 (2016) P07024.
  15. T. I. Dornelas, F. T. H. Araújo, A. S. Cerqueira, J. A. Costa, R. A. Nóbrega, Front-end Design and Characterization for the v-Angra Nuclear Reactor Monitoring Detector, JINST 11 (2016) P07018.
  16. H. P. Lima Jr, L. M. de Andrade Filho, L. F. G. Gomez, R. G. Gama, Data Acquisition with Optimal Pulse Amplitude Estimation for a Neutrino Detection Experiment, Notas Tecnicas CBPF-NT-006/14 (2014).
  17. J. M. S. Souza, Sistema digital de selecao online de eventos para o detector Neutrinos Angra, Master Thesis Universidade Federal da Bahia (2016).
  18. Hamamatsu Photonics K. K., Photomultiplier Tubes and Assemblies, (2017).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
329188
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description