Neutrino Interactions with Nuclei
Abstract
We investigate neutrinonucleus collisions at intermediate energies incorporating quasielastic scattering and the excitation of 13 resonances as elementary processes, taking into account medium effects such as Fermi motion, Pauli blocking, meanfield potentials and inmedium spectral functions. A coupledchannel treatment of final state interactions is achieved with the GiBUU transport model. Results for inclusive reactions, neutrino and electroninduced, as well as for pion production and nucleon knockout are presented.
:
13.15.+g, 25.30.Pt, 25.30.c, 23.40.Bw, 24.10.Lx, 24.10.Jv6x9
address=Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Giessen, Germany address=Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Giessen, Germany address=Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Giessen, Germany address=Departamento de Física Teórica and IFIC, Universidad de Valencia  CSIC, Spain
The study of neutrino interactions with nuclei is crucial for current and future oscillation experiments. The main goal is to improve our knowledge of the energy fluxes, backgrounds and detector responses in order to minimize systematic uncertainties. Most of the experiments are performed on nuclear targets, thus, an understanding of nuclear effects is essential for the interpretation of the data.
Here we report on an application to such processes with a model that has been well tested on other nuclear reactions, such as heavyion collisions, proton and pioninduced reactions on nuclei and photonuclear reactions, using the same theoretical input and the same code: the Giessen BUU model (GiBUU). The model treats the nucleus as a local Fermi gas of nucleons with the total reaction rate given by an incoherent sum over all nucleons embedded in a nuclear medium (impulse approximation). For more details, we refer the reader to our earlier work Leitner:2006 (); Buss:2007ar ().
At neutrino energies ranging from GeV, the relevant contribution to the cross section is quasielastic (QE) scattering () and pion production (). The latter is dominated by the excitation of the resonance and its subsequent decay ()  however, with increasing neutrino energy also higher resonances contribute significantly to pion production. The cross section for QE scattering and resonance excitation on a bound nucleon is given by
(1) 
where we use the following notation: a lepton with fourmomentum scatters off a nucleon with momentum , going into a lepton with momentum and a nucleon/resonance with . We further define the transferred energy and the solid angle . The dynamics of the interaction is incorporated in the leptonic () and hadronic () tensor with the appropriate coupling .
For QE scattering, we use the standard expression for (cf. e.g. our earlier work in Ref. Leitner:2006 ()) with the BBBA2005 vector form factors Bradford:2006yz () and a dipole ansatz with GeV for the axial ones. For the resonance excitation, we have considered, besides the dominant (P(1232)) resonance, 12 higher resonances, namely P(1440), D(1520), S(1535), S(1620), S(1650), D(1675), F(1680), D(1700), P(1720), F(1905), P(1910) and F(1950). Following Refs. AlvarezRuso:1997jr (); Lalakulich:2006sw (), we relate the vector form factors to helicity amplitudes for which we use the results of the recent MAID analysis Tiator:2003uu () while the axial form factors follow a modified dipole ansatz with an axial coupling obtained with the assumption of PCAC and pionpole dominance.
The nucleons are embedded in a nucleus which is treated within a local ThomasFermi approximation as a Fermi gas of nucleons bound by a density and momentum dependent meanfield. The density profiles are based on data from electron scattering and HartreeFock calculations. The presence of a momentumdependent mean field leads to the appearance of effective masses in Eq. (1). denotes the effective mass of the incoming nucleon , defined as , where denotes its vacuum mass and the scalar potential. The spectral function includes the effect of the momentumdependent potential on the outgoing particle and also accounts for the inmedium collisional broadening of the outgoing final states. More details can be found in Ref. Buss:2007ar ().
In Fig. 1, we present results for the CC reaction Fe for a neutrino beam energy of 1 GeV and a lepton scattering angle of (left panel) and for O (right panel). One observes a broadening and a shift of the QE and pion peak caused by Fermi motion, the momentumdependent potential and the inmedium width of the nucleon and the resonances. As a necessary check of our calculations we have obtained within the same model also electroninduced inclusive cross sections. In these calculations we have omitted the axial parts of the hadronic currents and included in addition nonresonant singlepion background Buss:2007ar (). The results for O are shown in Fig. 2 for two different energies. The overall agreement with the data is very good and comparable to that in Ref. Sakuda (). The agreement is improved, in addition to using a local Fermi gas, by including a mean field and inmedium spectral functions.
Besides inclusive reactions, also semiinclusive processes where, in addition to the outgoing lepton in the reaction, one or more pions, nucleons etc. are detected are experimentally accessible. In particular for NC reactions one has to rely on the modeling of these reactions since the outgoing neutrino is not detected. In our description, we treat the exclusive reaction as a two step process: once the initial interaction has taken place, the final state particles are transported out of the nucleus. These final state interactions (FSI) are implemented by means of the coupledchannel GiBUU transport model Buss:2006yk () based on the BUU equation
This equation describes the spacetime evolution of the generalized phase space density of particles of type with invariant mass under the influence of the Hamiltonian . The BUU equations are coupled via the mean field in and via the collision term . The collision integral accounts for elastic and inelastic collisions, decays and the formation of resonances, including Pauli blocking. FSI therefore lead to absorption, charge exchange, a redistribution of energy and to the production of new particles.
The impact of FSI effects on NC induced pion production is clearly visible in the ratios obtained by dividing the kinetic energy spectra with FSI by the one without FSI (cf. curves in Fig. 3 labeled “GiBUU”; see Ref. Leitner:2006 () for details). The absorption is bigger for Fe (left panel) than for O (right panel), as expected. For pions with kinetic energy above GeV we find large effects of FSI, with especially strong suppression around GeV. This is the region where pion absorption and rescattering are most prominent due to the excitation of the resonance ( followed by , , or ). At lower pion energies we find a peak because pions of higher energy in average loose energy via rescattering. Since sidefeeding shifts strength always from the dominant into the less dominant channel we find that FSI lead to a strong reduction of the total yield in the channel (solid line) while the reduction is much smaller in the and channels (dashed lines); there the ratio even exceeds 1 at low kinetic energies. A similar pattern has been experimentally observed in pion photoproduction (cf. Fig. 16 in Ref. Krusche:2004uw ()). The particular dependence of both ratios reflects wellknown features of the dynamics in nuclei.
The curves in Fig. 3 labeled with “PPY” give
the corresponding results obtained from a calculation of Paschos
et al. Paschos:2000be (); Paschos:2007pe (). In this article we
compare with the corrected results of
Ref. Paschos:2007pe ()
A correct understanding of the inmedium dynamics is crucial for the interpretation of experiments to ensure proper identification of QE events. This is visualized in Fig. 4 where we show the NC induced cross sections for proton and neutron knockout on Fe. The solid lines, showing the results with FSI included, lie in both cases clearly above the ones without FSI (dashed lines); this enhancement is caused by secondary interactions. Furthermore, it is indicated whether the knockout was induced by initial QE scattering (dashdotted) or excitation (dotted) through e.g. , , . Both contribute to the cross section above GeV with almost equal amounts. If an initially produced pion gets absorbed, then this event looks “QElike” which can lead to systematic errors in the data analysis. This is particularly critical for the NC case, where the outgoing neutrino remains undetected. Only for neutrino energies up to GeV one can neglect the resonance contributions to nucleon knockout.
We conclude that with the present knowledge of dynamics in nuclei, based on extensive studies of pion and photonuclear reactions, a realistic, quantitative description of neutrino induced pion production in nuclei is possible. Inmedium effects in scattering, and in particular FSI, are important for the interpretation of LBL oscillation experiments. The influence of final state interactions, therefore, has to be treated with the same degree of sophistication as the primary production process and the nuclear spectral function information.
We thank all members of the GiBUU project for cooperation. This work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and by BMBF.
Footnotes
 The original work Paschos:2000be () has an error in the elementary pion production cross section.
References
 T. Leitner, L. AlvarezRuso, and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C73, 065502 (2006); ibid. C74, 065502 (2006).
 O. Buss, T. Leitner, U. Mosel, and L. AlvarezRuso, Phys. Rev. C (2007), in press, arXiv:0707.0232 [nuclth].
 M. Sakuda, talk at this conference; H. Nakamura, M. Sakuda, T. Nasu and O. Benhar, arXiv:0705.3884 [hepph].
 R. Bradford, A. Bodek, H. Budd, and J. Arrington, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 159, 127 (2006).
 L. AlvarezRuso, S. K. Singh, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C57, 2693 (1998).
 O. Lalakulich, E. A. Paschos, and G. Piranishvili, Phys. Rev. D74, 014009 (2006).
 L. Tiator, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A19, 55 (2004).
 M. Anghinolfi, et al., Nucl. Phys. A602, 405 (1996).

O. Buss, L. AlvarezRuso, A. B. Larionov, and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C74, 044610 (2006);
GiBUU website: http://gibuu.physik.unigiessen.de/.  B. Krusche, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A22, 277 (2004).
 E. A. Paschos, L. Pasquali, and J.Y. Yu, Nucl. Phys. B588, 263 (2000).
 E. A. Paschos, I. Schienbein, and J. Y. Yu, arXiv:0704.1991 [hepph]; E. A. Paschos, private communication (2006).
 S. L. Adler, S. Nussinov, and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. D9, 2125 (1974).