Mott electrons in an artificial graphenelike crystal of rare earth nickelate
Deterministic control over the periodic geometrical arrangement of the constituent atoms is the backbone of the material properties, that along with the interactions define the electronic and magnetic ground state. Following this notion, a bilayer of a prototypical rare-earth nickelate, NdNiO, combined with a dielectric spacer, LaAlO, has been layered along the pseudo cubic  direction. The resulting artificial graphene-like Mott crystal with magnetic 3 electrons has antiferromagnetic correlations. In addition, a combination of resonant X-ray linear dichroism measurements and ab-initio calculations reveal the presence of an ordered orbital pattern, which is unattainable in either bulk nickelates or nickelate based heterostructures grown along the  direction. These findings highlight another promising venue towards designing new quantum many-body states by virtue of geometrical engineering.
The intense research activities over the last several decades on transition metal oxides (TMO) have demonstrated the successful manipulation of various correlated electron phenomena including the metal-insulator transition, high temperature superconductivity, magnetism, colossal magnetoresistance, multiferroicity, etc. by chemical doping and various external stimuli mit_rmp ; tokura1 ; edopedcuprates . The continuous advancements in ultra-thin film growth techniques with atomic precision provide additional opportunities for further control through epitaxial constraint, quantum confinement and heterostructuring with dissimilar layers Schlom ; triscone ; jak_nm ; tokura_nm_12 ; jak_rmp . To date, the vast majority of the reported work has been focused on systems grown along the pseudo-cubic  direction. The idea that a geometrical motif of an underlying lattice can also be a very powerful tool for generating new quantum many-body states has been vividly highlighted by the discoveries of exotic electronic and topological phases in geometrically frustrated materials (e.g. spin liquid, spin ice, magnetic monopole, etc.) guo1 ; guo2 ; balents ; Giblin . Following this paradigm, very recently several theoretical proposals have been put forward to utilize a few unit cells of a TMO heterostructured along the pseudo-cubic  directions lno1_fiete ; satoshi_prb ; sriro_prb ; nagaosa_nc ; lno_fiete ; pyrochlore_fiete ; okamoto_prl ; lno_strain_fiete ; lao_sto_111 ; lao_lno_111 ; okamoto_prb . This geometrically engineered motif relies on the presence of an artificially buckled honeycomb (i.e. graphene-like) lno1_fiete ; satoshi_prb ; nagaosa_nc (see Fig. 1), dice lattices sriro_prb for bilayers, tri-layers of O perovskites respectively and alternating triangular and Kagome atomic planes in O pyrochlore lattices pyrochlore_fiete . In spite of these exciting opportunities, to-date the experimental works on (111)-oriented thin films have been very limited ben_apl ; sfo ; triscone_nm ; lao_sto_111_sr ; spinel ; spinelsl ; takagi due to the extreme challenge of stabilizing materials along the strongly polar  direction blok .
Towards the realization of this idea, we have explored heterostructures based on the rare-earth nickelate NdNiO. Over the past few years, following the prediction of high cuprate-like physics in LaNiO/LaAlO heterostructures lno_th1 ; lno_th2 , a number of artificial quantum structures with rare earth nickelates NiO ( = La…Eu etc.), grown along the pseudo-cubic (001) direction have been extensively investigated Freeland2011 ; lno_jian_prb ; lno_keimer_science ; lno_keimer_nm ; lno_triscone ; jak_prl ; basov_prl ; jian_prl ; jian_nc ; eno_prb ; keimer_prl13 ; eno_co . In the bulk, nickelates exhibit a multitude of interesting electronic phases including the metal-insulator transition (MIT), paramagnetic metallic and insulating phases, and charge ordering with a strong dependence of the transition temperatures on the size of the rare-earth ion rno_phase . Magnetically, these materials demonstrate an unusual -type antiferromagnetic ordering etype .
Due to the markedly different arrangements of atoms along the  direction versus , the theoretical calculations lno1_fiete ; satoshi_prb ; lno_fiete ; lno_strain_fiete ; lao_lno_111 for (111) oriented bilayers of nickelates (Fig. 1(a)-(c)), predict the emergence of novel quantum many-body and interacting topological ground states, which are unattainable in both bulk nickelates and (001) grown heterojunctions. Intriguingly, in the weakly correlated limit the theory anticipates the emergence of several exotic topological phases (e.g. Dirac half-metal, quantum anomalous Hall effect, and ferromagnetic nematic phase) due to the buckled honeycomb lattice with electrons, even without spin-orbit coupling which is normally required to realize the topological states ti_rmp . However, due to the confinement of electrons along the out of plane direction, effective electron-electron correlation is enhanced compared to the bulk Nickelates and the model Hamiltonian calculations in the strongly correlated limit predict that orbitally ordered states are the lowest energy phases as compared to the bulk-like charge ordered phase lno1_fiete ; lno_fiete ; lno_strain_fiete .
In this paper, we report on the electronic and magnetic properties of geometrically engineered [2 uc NdNiO/4 uc LaAlO] (2NNO/4LAO) superlattices (SL) grown epitaxially on LAO (111) substrates (uc = unit cell in pseudocubic setting). Synchrotron based X-ray resonant magnetic scattering (XRMS) measurements showed that these artificial graphene-like Mott crystals have antiferromagnetic correlations. In addition, the combination of resonant X-ray linear dichroism measurements and first-principles GGA+ calculations reveal the presence of an orbitally ordered pattern, which has not been realized earlier in the rare-earth nickelates. The presence of this new orbitally polarized ground state is linked to the strong reduction in the hopping interaction in the buckled honeycomb lattice geometry combined with the breaking of local symmetry.
Epitaxial [2NNO/4LAO]x3 superlattices oriented along the  direction were grown by pulsed laser interval deposition own_apl . In order to avoid the formation of any oxygen deficient phase due to the interfacial polar discontinuity scirep , LaAlO (111) substrates were used. The possibility of faceted surface has been excluded by the streaks in RHEED (reflection high energy electron diffraction) patterns recorded during the growth and after cooling the film to room temperature sup . STEM (scanning transmission electron microscopy) experiments were performed using a spherical aberration-corrected JEM-ARM200F operated at 200 kV and high angle annular dark field (HAADF) imaging was performed using the collection semiangle of about 70-250 mrad. The observation of clear interfaces between NNO and LAO layers (Fig. 1(d) and also see supplemental sup ) further confirms the desired layer by layer growth of the superlattice. XRMS (x-ray resonant magnetic scattering) and XLD (x-ray linear dichroism) measurements were carried out at 4-ID-C beam line of Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National laboratory. X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out at 6-ID-B beam line of APS. DFT calculations were performed using the all-electron, full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) method, as implemented in the WIEN2k code Wien ; Wien2k . For the exchange-correlation potential we used the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) PBE96 , while the GGA+ method anisimov93 was used to take into account static local electronic correlations. All calculations were carried out using eV, eV (Ni ); eV (Nd ). The lateral lattice constant was fixed to the LAO (111) substrate, while the out-of-plane lattice parameter was optimized. Octahedral tilts and distortions were fully considered.
In order to map the investigated SL into the theoretically proposed phase space lno1_fiete ; satoshi_prb ; lno_fiete ; lno_strain_fiete ; lao_lno_111 , we start with the identification of the magnetic ground state of the Ni sublattice. The extremely ultra thin nature of the samples prohibits the investigation of their magnetic ground state by conventional magnetometry in the background of the large diamagnetic signal from the substrate. To overcome this, we determined the magnetic nature of these superlattices by element resolved XRMS carried out across the Ni edges with left () and right () circularly polarized light. For ultra-thin films, XRMS is a direct spectroscopic probe to elucidate magnetic properties of an electronic shell from a particular atom in multi-component materialsxrms . Fig. 2(a) shows the XRMS signal recorded at 25 K in the presence of 5 T magnetic field. As seen, the opposite sign of the XRMS signals of the and edge at fixed magnetic field () along with flipping of the XRMS signal upon reversing the direction of confirm that the signal is of magnetic origin and intrinsic to the Ni sublattice. In addition, the Ni XRMS signal decreases with reduction of the magnetic field and practically vanishes at 0.1 T (see supplemental sup ). This result immediately excludes the presence of any ferromagnetic ordering within these SLs. To provide further insight, the peak value of XRMS intensity around 852.8 eV is plotted as a function of magnetic field (). As seen in Fig. 2(b), the obtained linear dependence of the XRMS signal on implies either a paramagnetic (PM) or antiferromagnetic (AFM) spin configuration of the bilayer. To select between them, the XRMS signal was also measured as a function of temperature in an applied magnetic field of 5 T as shown in Fig. 2(c). As seen, a linear fit to the 1/XRMS vs. -dependence (Fig. 2(d)) yields a finite value of XRMS at 0 K (i.e. K), implying the presence of AFM spin correlations in the ground state.
Next we discuss the orbital structure investigated by the X-ray linear dichroism (XLD) technique. In the past, XLD has been successfully applied for uncovering different types of orbital ordering and the symmetry of a specific orbital state in various transition metal compounds yto_prl ; lsmo_afo ; lsmo_xld ; lsmo_xld1 ; surface_xld ; vo2_xld ; BaFeAs2_xld . For this, the geometrical arrangement between the sample and X-ray polarization vector, requires careful consideration for detecting the presence of orbital ordering. Specifically, as seen in Fig. 3(a), all the orbitals ( , , ) are oriented at = 54.7 with respect to the  growth axis for a NiO octahedron. Because of this, the XLD signal is expected to be very small even for a FOO (ferro orbital ordered sup ) state with 100% orbital polarization. In order to maximize the XLD signal, the samples were mounted on a copper wedge (Fig. 3(b)), which reorients the Ni-O bonds along vertical polarization, V and in the plane of horizontal polarization, H. To understand how an antiferro orbital ordered state gives rise to a finite XLD signal in this experimental setup, we refer to Fig. 3(c) and 3(d) showing the orientation of and orbitals with respect to the polarization directions H and V for = 0 and 45 respectively. This specific sample orientation with the wedge aligns the orbitals almost along V polarization giving a finite dichroic signal. On the other hand, orbitals are almost aligned in the plane of H polarization with a small but finite angle with respect to the polarization vector H, resulting in an opposite and strongly reduced dichroic signal compared to orbitals. As a result, instead of perfect cancellation of linear dichroism, a small finite XLD is expected to be observed for the antiferro orbital ordered (AFO) state analogous to the other well known AFO compounds, e.g. YTiO yto_prl , and LaSrMnO lsmo_afo .
Fig. 3(e) shows resonant Ni -edge x-ray absorption spectra (XAS) ( and ) and XLD spectra (difference of and ) obtained in the flat ( = 0) and wedge ( = 45) geometries. As seen, the XAS line shape is in excellent agreement with the expected Ni oxidation state akin to the bulk NNO. The multiplet structure in the line shape implies the localized nature of the charge carrier lno_jian_prb ; eno_prb and corroborates the transport results (shown in supplemental sup ). In addition, the observation of the XLD signal for = 0 with a derivative like shape indicates that the Ni orbital degeneracy is indeed lifted in the (111) heterostructure Freeland2011 . As anticipated from the discussion above, the XLD signal increased strongly when the measurement was conducted for the = 45 geometry. As expected for the bulk NNO without any orbital ordering scagnoli , our XLD measurements did not find any significant orbital polarization on a thick NNO (111) film (shown in supplemental sup ). This further emphasizes that the observed XLD in 2NNO/4LAO (111) SL is not a measurement artifact and the orbitally polarized ground state is engineered by this buckled honeycomb lattice geometry. The obtained value of XLD around 9% is quite large as the finite bandwidth of the bands and strong covalency lno_fiete ; lno_strain_fiete ; Freeland2011 ; Han2011 ; BlancaRomero2011 ; keimer_xld reduce the orbital polarization from expected value of atomic limit. We also point out, that this large XLD signal observed in the (111) 2NNO/4LAO system is comparable and even exceeds the values reported for the well established examples of orbitally ordered transition metal compounds lsmo_xld ; lsmo_xld1 ; surface_xld ; vo2_xld ; BaFeAs2_xld . It is important to emphasize that by the nature of the spectroscopic probe, XLD can only establish the presence of orbital ordering or orbital polarization but cannot resolve a specific type of the orbital pattern present in the system.
Threefold rotational symmetry is a key element of a buckled honeycomb lattice. To establish the type of orbital pattern responsible for the dichroic effect, we performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations with an on-site Hubbard term for both ferromagnetic (FM, ) and antiferromagnetic (AFM, ) spin arrangements of the Ni sites with symmetry. The relaxation of internal atomic coordinates retains the trigonal symmetry of the underlying lattice for both FM and AFM cases. For the hypothetical FM spin configuration, the structural relaxation yields two inequivalent Ni layers with magnetic moments of 1.29 and 1.09 and opens a small gap of 90 meV in the formerly Dirac-point semi-metallic band structure (see Fig. 4(a)). Most importantly, contrary to the experimental observation, the orbital polarization is found to be entirely quenched, as shown in the corresponding spin density plot in Fig. 4(b). The AFM state is found to be less stable compared to the FM state, even though XRMS measurements confirm absence of ferromagnetism. The energetic preference of this FM state, is similar to that obtained for the calculation of bulk nickelates park2012 ; james , and is attributed to the poor treatment of dynamical screening in ab-initio methods james . The issue of the overestimation of ferromagnetic state requires further investigation. The band structure for this AFM solution (shown in Fig. 4(c)) exhibits relatively flat bands with a gap of eV. In addition, instead of disproportionating the charge observed in the bulk NiO mazin_oo ; park2012 ; Johnston , this AFM solution breaks the degeneracy of doubly degenerate levels by a complex ordered orbital pattern (spin density shown in Fig. 4(d)) . The overall charge distribution (sum over the six sites of a buckled honeycomb lattice) for this pattern is approximately spherical, implying that the expected XLD would be vanishingly small.
Since bulk NNO has orthorhombic (Pbnm) structure and even the ultra thin film of NNO has a strong propensity to retain this symmetry icheng , it is crucial to examine the possibility of lowering the symmetry for this 2NNO/4LAO SL grown on rhombohedral LAO. Such symmetry lowering (to monoclinic) had been also reported earlier for the (111) growth of orthorhombic SrFeO (in bulk) on cubic SrTiO sfo . Also, we note that while this symmetry breaking is very unlikely in 2LaNiO/4LaAlO (2LNO/4LAO) SL on LAO (111) due to the rhombohedral symmetry of both bulk LNO and LAO, the almost negligible XLD signal for 2LNO/ 4LAO (111) SL (shown in supplemental sup ) strongly suggests the close connection between local symmetry breaking and orbital polarization. In order to elucidate this connection, we have carried out additional DFT+U calculations on a smaller unit cell of 2NNO/4LAO containing 30 atoms (labeled as 1x1 in Fig. 4(e)) with the AFM arrangement of spins. The structural relaxation lowers the symmetry to of the lattice. The spin density plotted in Fig. 4(f) for monoclinic AFM structure with equal magnetic moments on each Ni site clearly demonstrates the realization of an antiferro orbital ordering with staggered orbitals rotated by 90 in subsequent layers, i.e. individual (111) planes consisting of , orbitals respectively. The band structure shown in Fig. 4(e) also exhibits relatively flat bands with a gap of eV with orbital polarization strongly resemblant of the artificial double perovskite 1LaNiO/1LaAlO (111) superlattice, where pronounced Jahn-Teller like orbital polarization has been recently reported lao_lno_111 . Our first-principle calculations thus reveal that natural reduction of the Ni-O hopping interaction from the strong decoupling of triangular Ni layers combined with the breaking of local trigonal symmetry are the decisive factors in the emergence of this orbitally polarized Mott ground state in the bilayer of (111) oriented nickelates.
In summary, by devising bilayers of the rare-earth nickelate NdNiO along the pseudo cubic  direction, an artificial graphene-like Mott crystal with magnetic electrons has been realized. The buckled honeycomb lattice with Mott carriers exhibits antiferromagnetic correlations with antiferro orbital order in the ground state, which are unattainable in either bulk NdNiO or in analogous heterostructures grown along the conventional (001) direction. These findings open a pathway to exotic Mott and interacting topological states by means of geometrical engineering in buckled honeycomb and dice lattice geometry sriro_prb ; nagaosa_nc ; okamoto_prl ; copdedlno_prb with many other promising strongly correlated perovskite oxides.
S. M. and J. C. deeply thank D. Khomskii, S. Okamoto, and G. A. Fiete for numerous insightful discussions. S. M. and D. M. were supported by the DOD-ARO under Grant No. 0402-17291. J.C. was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundations EPiQS Initiative through Grant No. GBMF4534. R. P. and D. D. acknowledge support by the DFG within SFB/TRR80 (project G3). Z. Y., J. S., and L. G. acknowledge National Basic Research Program of China 973 project (2014CB921002, 2012CB921702), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDB07030200. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
- (1) M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Rev. Mod. Phys 70, 1039 (1998).
- (2) Y. Tokura, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 797 (2006).
- (3) N. P. Armitage, P. Fournier, and R. L. Greene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2421 (2010).
- (4) D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, X. Pan, A. Schmehl, and M. A. Zurbuchen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 2429 (2008).
- (5) P. Zubko, S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, P. Ghosez, and J.-M. Triscone, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 141 (2011).
- (6) J. Chakhalian, A. J. Millis, and J. Rondinelli, Nature Mater. 11, 92 (2012).
- (7) H. Y. Hwang , Nature Mater. 11, 103 (2012).
- (8) J. Chakhalian, et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1189 (2014).
- (9) H.-M. Guo, and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 206805 (2009).
- (10) H.-M. Guo and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. B 80, 113102 (2009).
- (11) L. Balents, Nature 464, 199 (2010).
- (12) S. R. Giblin, S. T. Bramwell, P. C.W. Holdsworth, D. Prabhakaran and I. Terry, Nature Phys. 7, 252 (2011).
- (13) F. Wang, and Y. Ran, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241103(R) (2011).
- (14) D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y. Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, Nat. Commun. 2, 596 (2011).
- (15) K. -Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 84, 201104(R) (2011).
- (16) A. Rüegg, and G. A. Fiete, Phys. Rev. B 84, 201103(R) (2011).
- (17) A. Rüegg, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245131 (2012).
- (18) A. Rüegg, Phys. Rev. B 88, 115146 (2013).
- (19) D. Doennig, W. E. Pickett, and R. Pentcheva, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121110(R) (2014).
- (20) X. Hu, A. Rüegg, and G. A. Fiete, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235141 (2012).
- (21) S. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066403 (2013).
- (22) D. Doennig, W. E. Pickett, and R. Pentcheva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 126804 (2013).
- (23) S. Okamoto, et al. Phys. Rev. B 89, 195121 (2014).
- (24) B. Gray, H. N. Lee, J. Liu, J. Chakhalian, and J. W. Freeland, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 013105 (2010).
- (25) S. Chakraverty, A. Ohtomo, M. Okude, K. Ueno, and M. Kawasaki, Crystal Growth & Design 10, 1725 (2010).
- (26) M. Gibert, P. Zubko, R. Scherwitzl, J. Iniguez and J.-M. Triscone, Nat. Mater. 11, 195 (2012).
- (27) G. Herranz, F. Snchez, N. Dix, M. Scigaj, and J. Fontcuberta, Sci. Rep.2, 758 (2012).
- (28) X. Liu, et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 042401 (2014).
- (29) X. Liu, et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 071603 (2015).
- (30) D. Hirai, J. Matsuno, and H. Takagi, APL Mat. 3, 041508 (2015).
- (31) J. L. Blok, X. Wan, G. Koster, D. H. A. Blank, and G. Rijnders, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151917 (2011).
- (32) J. Chaloupka, and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016404 (2008).
- (33) P. Hansmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 016401 (2009).
- (34) J. W. Freeland, et al. Europhys. Lett. 96, 57004 (2011).
- (35) J. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 83, 161102(R) (2011).
- (36) A. V. Boris, Science 332, 937 (2011).
- (37) E. Benckiser, Nat. Mater. 10, 189 (2011).
- (38) R. Scherwitzl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 246403 (2011).
- (39) J. Chakhalian Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 116805 (2011).
- (40) M. K. Stewart, J. Liu, M. Kareev, J. Chakhalian, and D. N. Basov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 176401 (2011).
- (41) J. Liu, M. Kargarian, M. Kareev, B. A. Gray, P. Ryan, A. Cruz, N. Tahir, Y.-D. Chuang, J.-H. Guo, J. Rondinelli, J. W. Freeland, G. A. Fiete , and J. Chakhalian, Nat. Commun. 4, 2714 (2013).
- (42) D. Meyers, S. Middey, M. Kareev, M. van Veenendaal, E. J. Moon, B. A. Gray, J. Liu, J. W. Freeland, and J. Chakhalian, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075116 (2013).
- (43) A. Frano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 106804 (2013).
- (44) M. H. Upton, Y. Choi, H. Park, J. Liu, D. Meyers, J. Chakhalian, S. Middey, J.-W. Kim, and P. J. Ryan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036401 (2015).
- (45) D. Meyers, S. Middey, M. Kareev, J. Liu, J. W. Kim, P. Shafer, P. J. Ryan, and J. Chakhalian, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235126 (2015).
- (46) G. Catalan, Phase Transitions 81, 729 (2008).
- (47) J. L. García-Muñoz, J. Rodríguez-Carvajal and P. Lacorre, Phys. Rev. B 50, 978 (1994).
- (48) X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
- (49) S. Middey, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 261602 (2012).
- (50) S. Middey, Sci. Rep. 4, 6819 (2014).
- (51) See the Supplementary material.
- (52) K. Schwarz and P. Blaha, Comp. Mat. Sci. 28, 259 (2003).
- (53) P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave Plus Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties, ISBN 3-9501031-1-2 (Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2001).
- (54) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
- (55) V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 943 (1991).
- (56) J. J. Kavich, M. P. Warusawithana, J. W. Freeland, P. Ryan, X. Zhai, R. H. Kodama, and J. N. Eckstein, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014410 (2007).
- (57) F. Iga, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257207 (2004).
- (58) D. J. Huang,et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087202 (2004).
- (59) A. Tebano, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 137401(2008).
- (60) M. Huijben, et al. Phys. Rev. B 78, 094413 (2008).
- (61) D. Pesquera, et al. Nat. Commun. 3, 1189 (2012).
- (62) N. B. Aetukuri, et al. Nat. Phys. 9, 661-666 (2013).
- (63) Y. K. Kim, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 217001 (2013).
- (64) M. Wu, et al. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125124 (2013).
- (65) V. Scagnoli, U. Staub, M. Janousch, A. M. Mulders, M. Shi, G. I. Meijer, S. Rosenkranz, S. B. Wilkins, L. Paolasini, J. Karpinski, S. M. Kazakov, and S. W. Lovesey Phys. Rev. B 72, 155111 (2005).
- (66) M. J. Han, X. Wang, C. A. Marianetti, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 206804 (2011); ibid. 110, 179904(E) (2013).
- (67) A. Blanca-Romero, and R. Pentcheva, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195450 (2011).
- (68) G. Gou, I. Grinberg, A. M. Rappe, and J. M. Rondinelli, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144101 (2011).
- (69) H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156402 (2012).
- (70) I. I. Mazin, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 176406 (2007).
- (71) S. Johnston, A. Mukherjee, I. Elfimov, M. Berciu, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106404 (2014).
- (72) I. C. Tung, et al. Phys. Rev. B 88, 205112 (2013).
- (73) B. Ye, A. Mesaros, and Y. Ran, Phys. Rev. B 89, 201111(R) (2014).