# [

###### Abstract

We elaborate a modification of the deformable two-sublattice Mitsui model of [Levitskii R.R. et al., Phys. Rev. B. 2003, 67, 174112] and [Levitskii R.R. et al., Condens. Matter Phys., 2005, 8, 881] that consistently takes into account diagonal components of the strain tensor, arising either due to external pressures or due to thermal expansion. We calculate the related to those strains thermal, piezoelectric, and elastic characteristics of the system. Using the developed fitting procedure, a set of the model parameters is found for the case of Rochelle salt crystals, providing a satisfactory agreement with the available experimental data for the hydrostatic and uniaxial pressure dependences of the Curie temperatures, temperature dependences of spontaneous diagonal strains, linear thermal expansion coefficients, elastic constants and , piezoelectric coefficients and (). The hydrostatic pressure variation of dielectric permittivity is described using a derived expression for the permittivity of a partially clamped crystal. The dipole moments and the asymmetry parameter of Rochelle salt are found to increase with hydrostatic pressure.

\keywordsRochelle salt, thermal expansion, hydrostatic pressure, uniaxial pressure, Mitsui model \pacs65.40.De, 77.80.B-, 77.65.Bn, 65.40.Ba, 77.22.Ch

###### Abstract

Запропоновано модифiкацiю деформiвної двопiдґраткової моделi Мiцуї робiт [Levitskii R.R. et al, Phys. Rev. B. 2003, 67, 174112] та [Levitskii R.R. et al., Condens. Matter Phys., 2005, 8, 881], яка послiдовно враховує дiагональнi компоненти тензора деформацiй, що виникають пiд дiєю зовнiшнiх тискiв чи внаслiдок теплового розширення. Розраховано пов’язанi з цими деформацiями тепловi, п’єзоелектричнi та пружнi характеристики системи. Використовуючи запропоновану схему, для кристалiв сеґнетової солi знайдено такий набiр параметрiв теорiї, що забезпечує задовiльне узгодження з експериментальними даними для залежностей температур Кюрi вiд гiдростатичного та одновiсних тискiв, а також температурних залежностей теплових деформацiй, лiнiйних коефiцiєнтiв теплового розширення, пружних сталих i , п’єзоелектричних коефiцiєнтiв i (). Залежностi дiелектричної проникностi вiд гiдростатичного тиску описано за допомогою отриманого в роботi виразу для проникностi частково затиснутого кристалу. Виявлено, що дипольнi моменти та параметр асиметрiї в сеґнетовiй солi зростають з гiдростатичним тиском.

\keywordsсеґнетова сiль, теплове розширення, гiдростатичний тиск, одновiсний тиск, модель Мiцуї

201114443602
\doinumber10.5488/CMP.14.43602
Mitsui model with diagonal strains]Mitsui model with diagonal strains: A unified description of external pressure effect and thermal expansion
of Rochelle salt NaKCHOHO
A.P. Moina, R.R. Levitskii,
I.R. Zachek]A.P. Moina \refaddrlabel1, R.R. Levitskii
\refaddrlabel1, I.R. Zachek \refaddrlabel2
\authorcopyrightA.P. Moina, R.R. Levitskii,
I.R. Zachek, 2011
\addresses
\addrlabel1 Institute for Condensed Matter Physics
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

1 Svientsitskii Str., 79011 Lviv, Ukraine
\addrlabel2 Lviv Polytechnical
National University, 12 Bandera Str., 79013 Lviv, Ukraine

## 1 Introduction

The Mitsui model [1] (two-sublattice Ising model with asymmetric potentials) has been originally proposed for description of the reentrant phase behavior in Rochelle salt crystals. It considers the motion of certain ordering units in two interpenetrating sublattices of asymmetric double-well potentials. The model with certain modifications is also applicable to several other ferroelectrics [2], like those of the Rochelle salt type (deuterated and ammonium-doped [3] Rochelle salt at least at low doping ), RbHSO type [4, 5], AgNa(NO (SSN [6, 7]), SASD type [8] (NaNHSO2HO and NaNHSeO2HO), etc.

Very often, inclusion of deformational effects into the Mitsui model is indispensable for a proper description of the system behavior even at ambient pressure. Thus, a strong piezoelectricity associated with polarization and shear strain essentially affects the dynamic dielectric response of Rochelle salt due to the effect of crystal clamping by the high-frequency measuring field. The conventional Mitsui model yields a qualitatively incorrect behavior of the relaxation time and dynamic dielectric permittivity near the Curie temperatures. This problem is resolved [9] by taking into account the piezoelectric coupling with , also permitting to describe the phenomena of piezoelectric resonance and sound attenuation [10].

The sequence of phase transitions observed in NHHSO crystals can be described within the mean field approximation for the Mitsui model only with temperature dependent interaction constants [5]. It means that one must take into account the effect of thermal expansion, which is, ultimately, a deformational effect.

Since high pressure studies are the only means to continuously vary the system geometrical parameters, such as the orientation angles of atomic groups that form the dipole moments, interatomic distances, hydrogen bonds parameters, etc, as well as the interparticle interactions, and other parameters of the system, they can provide a valuable information on the mechanism of the phase transitions in ferroelectric crystals. A better insight is obtained if the effects of hydrostatic and various uniaxial and biaxial pressures are explored. Irrespectively of the crystal symmetry, these pressures produce diagonal components of the lattice strain tensor (). In low-symmetry systems, shear strains () can be induced as well. The diagonal strains also arise due to the thermal expansion of the crystals.

Nowadays, Rochelle salt [11, 12, 13, 14] and other crystals [15] described by the Mitsui model often serve as test materials for experiments with nanosize phenomena. Properties of the ferroelectric nano-inclusions in a solid matrix are strongly affected by surface tension and thermal mismatch stresses. Thus, radial stresses in the plane perpendicular to spontaneous polarization arise in Rochelle salt nanorods grown in pores of alumina films [11, 12], inducing diagonal strains only. A phenomenological theory of ferroelectric properties of such nanorods was presented in [16].

The simplest way to incorporate an external pressure into a spin model is to consider its parameters (interaction constants) phenomenologically as linear functions of pressure. This approach has been used for different versions of the Mitsui model to describe the hydrostatic pressure variation of the transition temperatures in Rochelle salt [17] and SASD [18]. However, to describe a uniaxial stress dependence of in the same way, one would have to find new values of the fitting parameters for each stress direction. A unified model description of hydrostatic and uniaxial pressure effects, and, at the same time, the crystal thermal expansion at ambient pressure, with a single set of the fitting parameters is possible if we include into the model the lattice diagonal strains, instead of the pressures. Such a microscopic-like model of bulk crystals that includes the diagonal strains will be very helpful when one develops a model description of the above mentioned nanocrystal behavior.

The goal of the present paper is to develop a modification of the deformable Mitsui model with the shear strain [9], which would also take into account the diagonal components of the lattice strain tensor. The first attempt to create such a modification was made in [19]. The interaction constants and the asymmetry parameter were taken to be linear functions of the diagonal strains. Expressions for the piezoelectric and elastic characteristics of Rochelle salt, associated with these strains, have been obtained. However, all actual calculations were performed in the approximation of zero thermal strains; the external hydrostatic or uniaxial pressure effect was not considered, and the fitting procedure was inappropriate. Here we shall use the model of [19] and take into account the thermal expansion strains properly. We shall develop a consistent fitting procedure, free from the drawbacks of the previous [19] calculations, allowing us to obtain the above mentioned unified description of high pressure effects, thermal expansion, as well as physical properties of Rochelle salt associated with the diagonal strains.

Bulk Rochelle salt undergoes two second-order phase transitions at K and K, with the intermediate ferroelectric phase. Spontaneous polarization is directed along the axis, accompanied by spontaneous shear strain in the plane. The crystal is orthorhombic (space group ) in the paraelectric phases and monoclinic () in the ferroelectric phase. As it follows from the analysis of symmetry elements of its point group 222 and of the uniaxial pressure point group , no uniaxial or biaxial pressure applied along the orthorhombic crystallographic axes of a Rochelle salt crystal changes its symmetry. Neither do the hydrostatic pressure or thermal expansion of the crystal.

The mechanism of phase transitions in Rochelle salt remains rather obscure. According to the most recent measurements [20, 21], the largest displacements at a ferroelectric phase transition are undergone by the O, O, O oxygens. It appears that the dipoles of the Mitsui model, moving in the double-well potentials, should plausibly be associated with the OH and OH groups. Their motion, coupled with displacive vibrations of OH groups seems to be responsible for the phase transitions, as well as for the spontaneous polarization. It would be interesting to elucidate the pressure variation of the dipole moments, as well as of the asymmetry parameters of the double-well potentials. This can shed some light on the details of the transition mechanism.

The set of experimental data for Rochelle salt, used for verification of the present modification of the Mitsui model, includes the hydrostatic pressure dependences of transition temperatures [22, 23] and dielectric permittivity [23], the uniaxial [24, 25] and biaxial [26] pressure dependences of the Curie temperatures. Related to the diagonal strains, components of piezoelectric (e.g. , ) and elastic () tensors [27, 28, 29], appearing in the ferroelectric phase only, should be also described by the model. The other characteristics, included into the fitting, are thermal expansion coefficients and dilatations [30, 31], as well as the diagonal-strain-related elastic constants[32] or compliances ().

We introduce the diagonal strains , , into the two-sublattice Mitsui model with the shear strain [9] in the manner it was done in [19]. In section 2 we make a further modification of the model by taking into account the host lattice contributions into the thermal expansion. Section 3 contains the obtained expressions for thermal, elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric characteristics. In section 4 we propose a new fitting procedure. Using the found set of the fitting parameters for the Rochelle salt crystals, we show that the developed theory is capable of describing the entire complex of the phenomena, related to the diagonal strains: thermal expansion, temperature behavior of monoclinic piezoelectric and elastic characteristics, hydrostatic, uniaxial, and biaxial pressure dependences of the Curie temperatures in Rochelle salt. The behavior of the dielectric permittivity under hydrostatic pressure is described using the derived expression for the permittivity of a partially clamped crystal.

## 2 System thermodynamics in the presence of diagonal strains

We consider an orthorhombic piezoelectric crystal in the paraelectric phase, to which an external hydrostatic or uniaxial or biaxial (along the crystallographic axes) pressure can be applied. All these pressures produce diagonal strains (); these strains are also present due to the thermal expansion. Paraelectric piezoelectricity is associated with the shear strain . The Rochelle salt symmetry is presumed having the spontaneous polarization directed along the axis and coupled to the strain .

We start with the modified two-sublattice Mitsui model with a piezoelectric coupling to the shear strain and with the diagonal strains [9, 19]. A unit cell of the model consists of two dipoles (two sublattices), oppositely oriented along the -axis (the axis of spontaneous polarization); they are compensated in the paraelectric phases and get non-compensated in the ferroelectric phase. The actual unit cell of a real Rochelle salt crystal is twice as large and contains four dipoles. At the transition to the monoclinic phase the angle between the and axes changes from to . The diagonal strains , , describe the relative changes in the lattice constants , , and , respectively, due to thermal expansion or under pressure.

In the mean field approximation, the model Hamiltonian reads [9]

(1) |

where ; is the number of the unit cells; , are the Fourier-transforms (at ) of the constants of interaction between pseudospins belonging to the same and to different sublattices, respectively.

The phenomenological part of the Hamiltonian is a ‘‘seed’’ energy of the host lattice of heavy ions which forms the asymmetric double-well potentials for the pseudospins. For the case of Rochelle salt symmetry in presence of diagonal strains, shear strain , and field , it reads

(2) |

Here is the vacuum permittivity; is the unit cell volume of the model. The three first terms in are the elastic, piezoelectric, and electric contributions due to the shear strain and longitudinal electric field . Two last terms are related to the diagonal strains. Here , , are the ‘‘seed’’ constants describing the phenomenological contributions of the crystal lattice into the corresponding observed quantities , , and . In fact, the index in is redundant, as the difference between the observed and at is negligible. The ‘‘seed’’ quantities are zeros if the corresponding observed quantities are zeros in the most symmetric phase (orthorhombic in the case of Rochelle salt).

The last term, absent in the earlier model [19], is the contribution of the host lattice into the energy of thermal expansion. are the ‘‘seed’’ thermal expansion coefficients; are the temperatures at which the components of this contribution vanish. It is known that the thermal strains can be set to be equal to zero at any arbitrary temperature (the reference point for thermal expansion). This can be achieved by choosing the values of accordingly; they will differ from due to the pseudospin system contributions to the thermal expansion. To take into account the ‘‘seed’’ contribution of the host lattice is indispensable for a proper description of thermal expansion.

The coefficients

(3) |

in (1) are the local mean fields acting on pseudospins of the first and second sublattices in the unit cell. The parameter describes the asymmetry of the double well potential; is the effective dipole moment. The model parameter describes the internal field created by the piezoelectric coupling with and essentially determines the piezoelectric and elastic characteristics associated with the shear strain [9, 19]. It is also assumed that a longitudinal electric field is applied.

(4) |

as well as the asymmetry parameter

(5) |

are taken to be linear functions of the diagonal strains [19]. Here are introduced simply as the expansion coefficients. However, for and such an expansion is equivalent to taking into account the electrostrictive coupling with the diagonal strains. For it implicitly describes the changes in the asymmetry parameter due to the changes produced by external pressure or thermal expansion in the interatomic distances and in the geometric parameters of the potential, like the distance between the potential wells, etc. The parameters , are analogous to the deformational potentials introduced in the Anderson-Halperin-Varma-Phillips [33, 34] model of two-level systems with asymmetric double-well potentials in order to describe ultrasound attenuation and thermal conductivity in amorphous solids at very low temperatures.

The thermodynamic potential of the considered model is obtained within the mean field approximation in the following form

(6) |

where , is the Boltzmann constant, and

Here for hydrostatic pressure; and for the uniaxial pressure applied along the axis , etc. The shear pressure is introduced formally, in order to find the elastic and piezoelectric characteristics associated with it; after that it is put equal to zero.

We introduced the following linear combinations of the mean pseudospin values

is the parameter of ferroelectric ordering in the system. The parameters and are determined from the saddle point of the thermodynamic potential (6): a minimum of with respect to and a maximum with respect to are realized at equilibrium. The corresponding equations are

(7) |

## 3 Physical characteristics of Rochelle salt related to diagonal strains

Using the following thermodynamic relations

where is the pressure and temperature dependent unit cell volume, and retaining only linear in terms in the ‘‘seed’’ contributions, we obtain expressions for strains and polarization

(8) | |||

(9) | |||

(10) |

Here are the elements of the matrix inverse to the matrix of ‘‘seed’’ elastic constants .

Two first terms in equation (8) represent the host system contributions into the Hooke’s law and thermal expansion with regular pressure and temperature behavior. The sum in equation (8) gives the pseudospin subsystem contributions into the strains, having anomalous behavior in the ferroelectric phase. The second term in equation (8) was absent in the previous model [19].

From equations (8)–(10) we can derive expressions for other characteristics related to the diagonal strains. Thus, the coefficients of linear thermal expansion are obtained in a rather cumbersome form

(11) | |||||

where

is a unit matrix. The other notations are

Alternatively, the coefficients of thermal expansion can be found by numerical differentiation of equation (8) for the strains with respect to temperature; the results, of course, coincide. The coefficients are expected to have small anomalies at the Curie temperatures [31, 30].

The molar specific heat at constant pressure of the model is obtained from the molar entropy

where ; is the universal gas constant, and is the Avogadro constant. Thus, the molar specific heat of the model is

(12) | |||||

As we shall see, it has small anomalies at the transition points. To obtain the total specific heat of a crystal that can be compared to experimental data, we have to add to equation (12) a regular term linear in temperature (within the considered temperature range) that would correspond to a contribution of lattice vibrations not taken into account within our model. Thus,

(13) |

the coefficients and will be specified by fitting equation (13) to experimental data. Often, an inverse procedure is performed, when a regular linear contribution is subtracted from the experimental data; the obtained result is then compared with the theoretical specific heat of the ordering subsystem.

The other found characteristics are, in particular, the elastic constants at constant electric field ()

(14) | |||||

(15) |

as well as the monoclinic piezoelectric coefficients

(16) |

where is the matrix of elastic compliances, inverse to the matrix of elastic constants , and

The other piezoelectric and elastic characteristics are

Here,

(17) |

is the dielectric susceptibility of a clamped crystal, and

(18) |

is the static dielectric susceptibility of a mechanically free crystal [19]. Here we introduce the following notations

In paraelectric phases, this expression for the free susceptibility coincides with that obtained within the modified Mitsui model without thermal strains [10]. The sum , different from zero in the ferroelectric phase and not exceeding 5% of the total susceptibility, was absent in the earlier model.

As one can easily verify, monoclinic quantities , , , , , ( differ from zero only at non-zero polarization, in agreement with the symmetry considerations.

The temperature of the second order phase transition is determined from the condition that dielectric susceptibility of a free crystal diverges at . From equation (18) and using equation (7) we obtain

(19) |

where the model parameters , , are taken at , being renormalized by diagonal strains according to equation (4).

Equation (19) is valid both for the ambient pressure case and for the stressed crystal. It can be rewritten in the two following convenient forms:

(20) |

which gives an explicit expression for at the transition points, and

useful in the fitting procedure. Here are the strains at the Curie temperature.

## 4 Numerical calculations

### 4.1 Fitting procedure

The model parameters must provide a fit of the theory to the experimental data for the following characteristics: the Curie temperatures at ambient pressure ( in Rochelle salt) and their hydrostatic and uniaxial pressure slopes and , the temperature curves of thermal expansion strains , linear thermal expansion coefficients, monoclinic piezomodules , and elastic constants and (). Simultaneously we check for an agreement with experiment for the quantities previously described [9, 10] by the modified Mitsui model without thermal strains, such as spontaneous polarization, static free and clamped dielectric susceptibilities , piezomodule , specific heat, elastic constant at constant field , as well as microwave dielectric permittivity . A detailed analysis of the effect of diagonal strains on the physical characteristics of Rochelle salt associated with the shear strain will be given elsewhere.

The adopted values of the model parameters are given in table 1; details of the fitting procedure are described below.

(K) | ( Cm) | (K | C/m | ||||||

0.3162 | 0.662 | 764.63 | 1476.46 | 745.14 | 0.033 | 10.1 | |||

(K) | |||||||||

( K) | (K) | ||||||||

5.800 | 3.353 | 4.333 | 238.35 | 185.32 | 311.71 | ||||

( N/m) | |||||||||

2.842 | 1.794 | 1.541 | 4.219 | 2.031 | 3.987 | 1.18 |

The temperature variation of the order parameter is determined by numerical minimization of the thermodynamic potential (6); is found from equation (7); the strains are determined from equations (8) and (9). As the reference point for thermal expansion (where at ) we chose the upper transition temperature K. This condition allows us to express from equation (8) via , , and . Strictly speaking, are not the fitting parameters of the model, since the reference point can be chosen arbitrarily. At 308 K and at ambient pressure, the lattice constants are [35] Å, Å, Å.

The ‘‘seed’’ linear thermal expansion coefficients were chosen to yield the thermal strains at equal to , where are the experimental [31] values of the expansion coefficients in the middle of the ferroelectric phase (at 275 K).

Special care has been taken that below 20 kbar for the hydrostatic pressure and below 200 bar for uniaxial or biaxial pressures and between 0 and 350 K, no additional phase transition takes place in the system, apart from those taking place at ambient pressure.

The number and (if any) temperature and order of the phase transitions for the Mitsui model without thermal strains are usually analyzed in terms of the dimensionless variables and

(21) |

and the dimensionless transition temperature

(22) |

The phase diagram of the conventional (undeformable) Mitsui model in the plane [36, 37, 38] shows the regions with different numbers and types of the phase transitions; its topology is not changed by inclusion of the shear strain . It has been found that only in a very narrow region of the plane, the system undergoes two second order phase transitions with the intermediate ferroelectric phase.

In the presence of diagonal strains, and become functions of temperature and pressure. In the fitting procedure we shall deal with the values of and at the upper Curie temperature and at ambient pressure and . Absence of additional phase transitions at the chosen values of the model parameters is verified directly, by calculating the order parameter at all temperatures between 0 and 350 K and at pressures below 25 kbar (hydrostatic) or 200 bar (uniaxial). The values of and should be from the same region of the phase diagram of the undeformable Mitsui model that yield two second order phase transitions. With decreasing , the maximal values of spontaneous polarization, spontaneous strain , and anomalous parts of diagonal strains increase. We choose the value of that gives the best agreement with experiment for these characteristics. Once the values of , , , and are chosen, we are in a position to find , , and , using equations (20), (21), and (22).

The parameters , , and are varied around their values obtained in the previous study [9] in order to get the best fit for spontaneous polarization , piezoelectric coefficient , static free and clamped dielectric susceptibilities and dynamic dielectric permittivity . The dipole moment is assumed to decrease linearly with an increasing temperature as

The values of and are given in table 1.

We require that the theoretical values of the elastic constants () at should coincide with their experimental values [39], available for 307 K (this is a reasonable approximation due to a very weak temperature dependence of ). Thus, we can easily determine using equation (14).

It is required that the best possible description of experimental [24, 25] uniaxial pressures dependence of the two Curie temperatures should be obtained. To this end, at the chosen , , , , , the six parameters and are determined from six linear equations (3) written at ( and ) at bar and combined with equation (20). The slopes were varied around their experimental values[24]. The strains at the Curie temperatures were approximated as

during the fitting. The obtained values of and were found to be independent of the used values of .

One of parameters, say, , can be determined from the condition that the lower Curie temperature should be K. For the two remaining parameters and there is the condition that the two calculated transition temperatures at hydrostatic pressure of 1 kbar and the lower transition temperature at 20 kbar would be in agreement with the experimental data [22, 23]. However, the dependences of the transition temperatures on uniaxial pressures and on the hydrostatic pressure are not completely independent, (this will be discussed later). Therefore, normally and can be varied continuously in certain ranges and provide correct theoretical dependences at given , and . From these ranges we should select the values which yield the best fit for the temperature curves of the piezoelectric coefficients , anomalous parts of thermal strains in the ferroelectric phase, and thermal expansion coefficients . It should be mentioned, however, that a perfect fit both for ([27]) and ([31]) cannot be obtained simultaneously, so a certain compromise has to be made.

A criterion to make an unambiguous choice of the theory parameters hardly exists. Since the chosen set of is not unique, it is not possible to precisely establish the temperature and pressure variation of the interaction constants. However, the overall tendency is such that the hydrostatic compression enhances the asymmetry parameter , as well as the constants of interactions between the pseudospins within the same and in different sublattices. Pressure slopes of , , and are very sensitive to the choice of at given , while the observable quantities are not that much sensitive. The average slopes are about 1–3%/kbar for and 4.5–7%/kbar for and . This issue will be explored in more detail elsewhere.

### 4.2 Thermal expansion and specific heat

The temperature dependence of the diagonal strains caused by thermal expansion of a crystal in the absence of external pressures is plotted in the inset to figure 2.

The experimental points, obtained from the data for thermal dilatations [31], are well described by the proposed theory.

In the ferroelectric phase, the curves have small bucklings (anomalous parts) caused by electrostrictive coupling to spontaneous polarization. In order to extract these anomalous parts of the diagonal strains, Imai [31] extrapolated the measured temperature curves of the strains from the paraelectric phases onto the ferroelectric phase and subtracted them from the total measured strains. With the same purpose, we calculate some hypothetical paraelectric strains (coinciding in the paraelectric phases with the actual strains ) from equation (8) by putting at all temperatures and determining from equation (7), and find the spontaneous strains as . The obtained results are shown in the major part of figure 2. As one can see, at the adopted values of the model parameters, the theory well reproduces the asymmetric shape of the curve, but underestimates the magnitude of and . The agreement can be improved by choosing different values of the model parameters, but the agreement with will be spoiled.

The corresponding linear thermal expansion coefficients are shown in figure 2. The theoretical and experimental values of their jumps at the Curie temperatures are summarized in table 2.

(K | (J/mol K) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|

–6.0 (–7.0) | 3.0 (3.5) | 3.7 (4.5) | 0.74 | |

4.7 (7.1) | –2.1 (–3.7) | –1.1 (–2.0) | 1.09 |

We have a fairly good agreement with experiment [31] for and , both for the signs and for the values of the coefficient anomalies at the transition points, as well as for the temperature slope of the curves in the ferroelectric phase. The agreement is worse for . It should be noted that the experimental behavior of is somewhat different from that of and , with a marked decrease below the lower Curie temperature and a large difference between the coefficient values in the two paraelectric phases. No perceptible temperature variation in the ferroelectric phase was experimentally detected, also in contrast with the and behavior. The theoretical temperature curve of is very much like that of and qualitatively similar to that of . The theoretical in the upper paraelectric phase well accords with the single experimental value of [40] obtained from the synchrotron radiation Renninger scan, although the reported error of these measurements is so large that the values of [31] also fall in this error range (see figure 2).

Figure 3 shows that the present model yields a better agreement with experimental data for the small anomalies of specific heat of Rochelle salt at the Curie points than it was obtained with the earlier model [9], especially for the magnitude of the upper anomaly. The regular contribution of lattice vibrations was taken to be (J/mol K) for the present model and (J/mol K) for the previous model.

The calculated values of the specific heat jumps are given in table 2. We obtain positive anomalies at both transition points, in accordance with the most recent measurements [43]. The jumps were defined as the differences between the ferroelectric and paraelectric values of specific heat or expansion coefficients at the Curie points.

### 4.3 Diagonal-strain-related piezoelectric and elastic constants

Figure 5 shows temperature dependences of piezoelectric constants . As one can see, a fairly good agreement with experiment is obtained, including the opposite signs of and of and , asymmetric shape of dependence, as well as the interception of the and curves near the lower Curie point. The overall behavior of is similar to that of .

We do not depict the calculated elastic constants and (), as they are practically temperature independent between 230 and 330 K. A very small variation can be detected in the ferroelectric phase for , with the difference between and constant being less than 1% of at most. The maximal values of monoclinic constants are more than by one order of magnitude smaller than . The shape of the experimental vs curve is qualitatively reproduced by the proposed model, as seen in figure 5. A quantitative agreement with experiment is reasonable.

The coefficients of piezoelectric strain are shown in figure 6 at zero and high bias fields . The data of [27] were extracted from the given therein values of the product and of . In absence of external field actually diverges at the Curie temperatures, due to the term proportional to in equation (16); the bias field smears out these anomalies and lowers the peaks of the coefficients. A good agreement with the experimental points is obtained.

### 4.4 Hydrostatic pressure effects

Below we shall discuss how the high-pressure effects are described by the proposed modification of the Mitsui model. Figure 7 shows the calculated hydrostatic pressure dependence of the Curie temperatures. The proposed theory reproduces the experimentally observed linear increase of both Curie temperatures with pressure at its low values, as well as the increase of at higher pressures. The calculated slopes are 3.7 K/kbar at low pressures and 4.3 K/kbar above 12 kbar.

To describe the pressure variation of the static permittivity we need to make some changes in the theory parameters. The above given value of provides a roughly equal fit to many different experimental data for in paraelectric phases at atmospheric pressure. However, the sample to sample variation of permittivity at ambient pressure reaches 10% even in good samples [42] and is much larger in samples with defects. This is comparable with the changes in the Curie constants produced by hydrostatic pressure [23, 9] below 10 kbar. Thus, it seems impossible to try to describe these fine high-pressure effects, using for a non-deformed crystal the averaged value of given in table 1. Instead, we shall determine separate values of , which provide the best fit to the experimental data for static permittivity obtained in [23] and in [41] at each pressure considered therein. Thus, the possible pressure variation of the effective dipole moment can be inferred.

The measurements, reported both in [23] and in [41], revealed a decrease of the peak value of permittivity at a lower Curie temperature with increasing pressure. This is attributed [23] to a partial clamping of the samples due to the increased viscosity of the pressure-transmitting fluid and suppression of the piezoelectric shear strain . To calculate the dielectric permittivity of a partially clamped crystal we assume that the clamping caused by the viscous fluid under hydrostatic pressure is uniform throughout the crystal sample. We assume that, at least, the part of shear strain induced by the measuring electric field (normally at 1 kHz) is smaller than the one given by equation (9). The total strain is then equal to

(23) |

Here is a spontaneous part of the strain; is the field-induced part of the order parameter.

The introduced phenomenological coefficient describes the extent to which the external pressure suppresses the shear strain : the cases and correspond to the totally clamped and free crystals, respectively. Values of are, naturally, pressure and temperature dependent and are different for experimental setups with different pressure-transmitting liquids. Thus, the level of clamping at was apparently much higher in the experimental setup of [41] than in [23], possibly because the corresponding temperatures are lower, and the viscosity of pressure-transmitting liquid is higher (benzine and silicone oil [41] vs pentane isopentane mixture [23]).

Substituting equation (23) into equation (10) we obtain the corresponding polarization. Differentiating it with respect to , taking into account equation (7) and neglecting variation of diagonal strains with the field, we get the dielectric susceptibility of a partially uniformly clamped crystal

(24) |

where

From equation (24) in the limiting cases and we obtain susceptibilities of totally clamped and free (in the paraelectric phases) crystals. In the ferroelectric phase, a more accurate expression for susceptibility should also contain terms like , albeit small, produced by contributions of diagonal strains. In this subsection these contributions will be neglected, and permittivity will be calculated using equation (24).

The temperature curve of dielectric permittivity near the lower Curie point at atmospheric pressure presented in [23] appears to be drawn qualitatively. In the fitting procedure we relied on the data of [3] for these temperatures. Near the upper Curie point, the data of [23] and [3] agree fairly well.

Comparison of the calculated temperature dependences of the permittivity with experimental data is given in figures 8 and 9. A fairly good description of the experiment in paraelectric phases is obtained at a proper choice of and values. The disagreement at 2.2 and 4.1 kbar in figure 9 is due to the mismatch between the calculated and experimental Curie temperatures at these pressures. The disagreement observed in the ferroelectric phase is due to the essential domain contributions to the permittivity, not included into the present model.

To fit the data of [41] the coefficient is taken to be 1 at 297 K (a free crystal). At 255 K we use the following values of : 0.65, 0.4, 0.25, 0.2 at 0, 0.5, 1.2, 2.0 kbar, respectively. A linear interpolation between these values at 255 K and 1 at 297 K is used. For 3.2 kbar we use at 265 K and 1 at 297 K, also with a linear interpolation for the intermediate temperatures. For the data of [23] we use above 11.7 kbar for the lower Curie temperature.

The pressure and temperature variation of the dipole moment is more complicated and contradictory. First, to fit the experimental data of [41] for permittivity at ambient pressure we have to assume that increases with temperature; whereas for the data of [23], [3] it should be assumed to decrease with increasing temperature, but slower than it was given in table 1.

To fit the permittivity points at high pressures we need to assume that the pressure dependence of is opposite to its temperature dependence: if it decreases with increasing temperature, then it increases with pressure and vice versa. Thus, for the data of [23] we use the following dependence

with Cm and K. The pressure coefficient was kbar for pressures below 5 kbar and 0 above 10 kbar.

This behavior is quite unusual since the dipole moments are expected to be reduced by hydrostatic pressure or by decreasing temperature due to the overall reduction of interatomic distances. The increase of with hydrostatic pressure can be explained with the help of a certain assumption used in constructing the spatial four-sublattice model of Rochelle salt [44]. It states that the dipole moments in it are actually the 3D vectors, which are not oriented along the -axis like in the two-sublattice model. Their projections on the and axes are different from zero, but compensated at all temperatures, unless an electric field perpendicular to spontaneous polarization is applied. The -projections are the dipole moments of a two-sublattice Mitsui model, compensated in paraelectric phases. It may be assumed that hydrostatic pressure rotates the spatial dipoles in such a way that their projections on the -axis (and ) increase. This increase is fast at low pressures and slows down above 10 kbar, possibly because the dipoles are already oriented along the -axis.

To fit the data of [41] we use