Mathematical modeling of mechanical vibration assisted conductivity imagingAmmari was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant Project MULTIMOD–267184. Eunjung Lee was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NSF of Korea 2013R1A1A1004836. Kwon and Seo were supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (No. 2011-0028868, 2012R1A2A1A03670512).

Mathematical modeling of mechanical vibration assisted conductivity imagingthanks: Ammari was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant Project MULTIMOD–267184. Eunjung Lee was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NSF of Korea 2013R1A1A1004836. Kwon and Seo were supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (No. 2011-0028868, 2012R1A2A1A03670512).

Habib Ammari Department of Mathematics and Applications, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France (habib.ammari@ens.fr).    Eunjung Lee Department of Computational Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 120-749, Republic of Korea (eunjunglee@yonsei.ac.kr, 3c273-85@hanmail.net, seoj@yonsei.ac.kr). Eunjung Lee is the corresponding author.    Hyeuknam Kwon33footnotemark: 3    Jin Keun Seo33footnotemark: 3    Eung Je Woo Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 446-701, Republic of Korea (ejwoo@khu.ac.kr).
Abstract

This paper aims at mathematically modeling a new multi-physics conductivity imaging system incorporating mechanical vibrations simultaneously applied to an imaging object together with current injections. We perturb the internal conductivity distribution by applying time-harmonic mechanical vibrations on the boundary. This enhances the effects of any conductivity discontinuity on the induced internal current density distribution. Unlike other conductivity contrast enhancing frameworks, it does not require a prior knowledge of a reference data. In this paper, we provide a mathematical framework for this novel imaging modality. As an application of the vibration-assisted impedance imaging framework, we propose a new breast image reconstruction method in electrical impedance tomography (EIT). As its another application, we investigate a conductivity anomaly detection problem and provide an efficient location search algorithm. We show both analytically and numerically that the applied mechanical vibration increases the data sensitivity to the conductivity contrast and enhances the quality of reconstructed images and anomaly detection results. For numerous applications in impedance imaging, the proposed multi-physics method opens a new difference imaging area called the vibration-difference imaging, which can augment the time-difference and also frequency-difference imaging methods for sensitivity improvements.

Key words. Electrical impedance tomography, Mechanical vibration, Medical imaging, Anomaly detection

AMS subject classifications. 35R30, 35B30

1 Introduction

Electrical impedance imaging methods typically use a number of surface electrodes to inject currents and measure induced voltages. There exists numerous electrode configurations in electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for applications to the head, chest, breast, abdomen, and limbs. For the breast imaging, it is often desirable to adopt a planner probe or a plate with an array of electrodes placed over the breast. For this kind of electrode configuration, we may also investigate an electrical admittance imaging method, where exit currents subject to an applied voltage are measured.

Though the time-difference EIT has been finding clinical applications especially for the lungs, there still exist technical difficulties in producing reliable images of tumor and stroke, where the time-difference approach is not feasible. Noting that a reference data obtained beforehand at a certain time in the absence of an anomaly is not available, we need to develop a novel method to image the anomaly if it exists without using a time-difference approach.

Frequency-difference methods have been, therefore, suggested to utilize different frequency-dependent electrical properties of anomalies such as tumor and stroke compared with the background region. Although the frequency-difference methods have their own advantages, reconstructions of reliable frequency-difference images are hindered from several technical difficulties: the low sensitivity of measured voltage data on a local change of frequency-dependent admittivity, the inhomogeneous frequency-dependent admittivity distribution of the background region, measurement errors especially at high frequencies due to stray capacitances, and so on.

To improve the sensitivity of the frequency-difference EIT for tumor and stroke imaging applications, we propose redesigning the measurement method to include a process of mechanical vibration. By augmenting the primary physical process of electrical conduction, it allows us to perform a vibration-difference imaging in addition to the frequency-difference imaging.

In this paper, we will first describe the mathematical framework of the vibration-difference method in EIT. Emphasizing the sensitivity improvement by the conductivity modulation through a mechanical vibration, we will suggest two measurement settings where this new approach can be adopted. We will carry out rigorous analyses of these new vibration-difference methods and show their performances and feasibilities through numerical experiments.

2 Mathematical modeling

This section provides a new mathematical model for a mechanical vibration assisted conductivity imaging and its theoretical ground. To propose the model, we set to be a bounded domain with a boundary of class in . We assume that the electrical conductivity of is of class . Moreover, there exist and such that Furthermore, we suppose that is constant on a neighborhood of the boundary .

When we inject a current for some with its mean-value of zero, , the resulting electrical potential is governed by the following conductivity equation:

\hb@xt@.01(2.1)

where with being the outward unit normal vector at .

To perturb the conductivity distribution , we attach a mechanical vibrator on the boundary and apply a time-harmonic vibration. We assume that is composed of a linearly elastic, isotropic, and incompressible material of density equal to . We let be the shear modulus of . We assume that belongs to and there exist and such that If is the operating angular frequency, the resulting time-harmonic elastic displacement is denoted as for and , where satisfies the Stokes system [4]:

\hb@xt@.01(2.2)

Here, denotes the transpose of the matrix and is such that the compatibility condition holds.

In the sequel, we assume that is not a Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Stokes system on ; see [26]. We also recall that the analytical continuation principle holds true for the Stokes system. In fact, it can be proved using the results in [14, 15, 24] that if is zero in a ball inside , then is identically zero everywhere in provided that . Moreover, from [13, 17, 23], and there exists a positive constant depending only on and such that

The displacement causes the perturbation of the conductivity distribution, , which can be described as, for a time ,

\hb@xt@.01(2.3)

It induces , which can be captured by various electrical impedance imaging techniques. To show this, we let . We can rewrite the relation (LABEL:eq:sigma_ori) as

\hb@xt@.01(2.4)

where is a map such that, for a time ,

and is any smooth simply connected domain.

Assuming that , and , the perturbed conductivity can be approximated as

\hb@xt@.01(2.5)

since is assumed to be constant on a neighborhood of the boundary . Let denote the electrical potential of (LABEL:eq:potential_homo) with the conductivity distribution in place of . The potential varies with the time-change of :

\hb@xt@.01(2.6)

Denoting , we have

\hb@xt@.01(2.7)

In the last approximation, we dropped since both and are small.

From (LABEL:eq:potential_homo), by virtue of the approximation (LABEL:approx-v1), it follows that satisfies

\hb@xt@.01(2.8)

Therefore, we can express as

where is the solution to the following conductivity equation:

\hb@xt@.01(2.9)

Finally, we arrive at

\hb@xt@.01(2.10)

where is the solution to (LABEL:eqn-for-v1). Note that the measured data over time yields the knowledge of , which is (approximately) the difference between and measured without and with the mechanical vibration, respectively. The equation (LABEL:eqn-for-v1) clearly shows that carries information of . The major advantage of the proposed method is then to extract the additional information of from the boundary current-voltage relation.

In the following sections, we will deal with two imaging problems. The first one is to visualize the projected image of in a breast imaging setting using a planar array of electrodes. The second is for the anomaly identification in a more general EIT system configuration. Based on the approximation (LABEL:approx), we will provide novel reconstruction methods with rigorous analyses. We will extend the approximation (LABEL:approx) to piecewise constant conductivity distributions.

3 Vibration-assisted electrical impedance imaging

Quantitative measurements and imaging of the electrical and mechanical tissue properties have been studied to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the X-ray mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer. These methods are motivated from the experimental findings that electrical and mechanical properties of the breast tissue change with its pathological state. Malignant breast tissues have higher electrical conductivity values and are significantly stiffer than the surrounding normal tissues [19, 20, 29].

For example, for adjunct uses with the X-ray mammography, T-scan or trans-admittance scanner (TAS) uses a probe with an array of current-sensing electrodes to measure exit currents induced by an applied voltage [8, 9, 21, 27]. In trans-admittance mammography (TAM), the breast is compressed by a pair of parallel plates just like the X-ray mammography configuration [31]. One plate is a solid conductor connected to a constant voltage source and the other is equipped with an array of current-sensing electrodes to measure the exit currents induced by the applied voltage.

To apply the idea of the vibration-assisted impedance imaging technique, we consider the breasting imaging setup in Figure LABEL:fig:new_cont. The imaging domain is a hexahedral container, and two pairs of driving electrodes ( and ) are attached on the side of the container to inject two linearly independent currents. On the bottom plate denoted by , there are many small voltage-sensing electrodes to measure the distribution of the induced voltages. One may increase the number of measurements by increasing the number of the voltage-sensing electrodes. Though it is an impedance imaging configuration, we may apply this vibration-assisted method to TAS and TAM, which are based on the admittance imaging configuration.

Figure 3.1: Basic setup of a vibration-assisted electrical impedance imaging system

When we inject a current with its amplitude through each pair of the driving electrodes, the resulting potential satisfies the following mixed boundary value problem:

\hb@xt@.01(3.1)

In this model, effects of the contact impedance on the measured voltage values are neglected since we measure the voltages only on the voltage-sensing electrodes.

Attaching a mechanical vibrator on a part of , we follow the approach described in the previous section. The time-harmonic displacement inside generates the conductivity perturbation . Following the derivation to obtain in (LABEL:eqn-for-v1), the difference in the potentials between two cases of without and with the applied mechanical vibration can be described by for each :

\hb@xt@.01(3.2)

Now, we are ready to provide a novel projective image reconstruction method for imaging the conductivity perturbation . From (LABEL:mainEq2), we have

and, therefore,

\hb@xt@.01(3.3)

Noting that , the bottom plate, is the measuring surface, the measured quantities are

Then, the projective image of is obtained by solving the following two-dimensional Poisson equation

\hb@xt@.01(3.4)

with the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition on . We will show from Numerical simulations that the formula (LABEL:project-formula) provides a diffused image of the projected distribution of onto the plate .

For the breast imaging method to be compatible with the X-ray mammography, we may apply the vibration to the plate on the top to compress the breast. The mechanical vibrator connected to the top plate will create propagating vibration waves inside the breast. The time-harmonic mechanical waves induce time-harmonic displacements of the breast tissues to result in time-harmonic conductivity vibrations. It is crucial to observe that these time-harmonic conductivity variations perturb the internal conductivity distribution and enhance the effects of the conductivity contrast on the internal current density distribution. Vibrating the breast during the data acquisition, therefore, we can further highlight the conductivity contrast between normal and cancerous tissues.

4 Vibration-assisted anomaly identification

It is well known that the static EIT imaging has a fundamental drawback due to the technical difficulties in handling forward modeling errors including the boundary geometry, electrode positions, and other systematic artifacts. Hence, in the anomaly identification problem using EIT, a reference current-voltage data (Neumann-to-Dirichlet data) is required to cancel out these common errors by a data subtraction method. Since we can repeat the measurements without and with the mechanical vibration, we can extract the effects of the vibration by taking the difference between two sets of the measured data. In this section, we consider a piecewise constant conductivity distribution and propose an anomaly location search and parameter estimation algorithm based on the vibration-difference approach.

Let be an anomaly compactly embedded in , where is a gravitational center of , is a -bounded domain containing the origin and is a small positive parameter representing the order of magnitude of the anomaly size. We suppose that is locally homogeneous and changes abruptly across the boundary of the anomaly (experimental results show that the conductivity of the cancerous tissue is to times larger than the one of normal tissue).

We also suppose that the shear modulus is piecewise constant such as

Then the displacement field satisfies

\hb@xt@.01(4.1)

where denotes the limit from outside and inside of , respectively.

Let be the tangent vectors at such that is an orthonormal basis of . Our first goal is to provide a representation of in the case of piecewise constant conductivity distributions. This can be achieved using layer potential techniques. Similar arguments to those in [7, 11, 12] yield, for ,

\hb@xt@.01(4.2)

where is the Neumann function given by

with being the magnitude of surface .

Now, let satisfy and let be defined by

\hb@xt@.01(4.3)

Note that since the restrictions to of the solutions to the conductivity equation in are in , . In order to emphasize the dependence of on , we denote by .

The next proposition follows from (LABEL:v1poc) by integration by parts. It gives the relation between measurable boundary data and interior information of anomaly .

Proposition 4.1

For satisfying , we have

\hb@xt@.01(4.4)

where is defined by (LABEL:eq:f2).

In the sequel, we set

\hb@xt@.01(4.5)

The imaging problem is then to locate the anomaly and to reconstruct its size, its conductivity, and its shear modulus from .

4.1 Location search method and asymptotic expansion

In order to have further analysis regarding in (LABEL:eq:data_rep), we represent the solution of (LABEL:eq:ori_ela) as follows (see [4, 2] for a detailed derivation and a rigorous statement)

\hb@xt@.01(4.6)

where is the background displacement field (in the absence of any anomaly)

\hb@xt@.01(4.7)

and is the solution of

\hb@xt@.01(4.8)

For explicit representations of and , let us introduce the fundamental tensor and corresponding to the equation

and , where

\hb@xt@.01(4.9)

Define such that . If with direction of the wave for a point source , then we have and

where is a single layer potential for the Stokes system, is the boundary integral operator and is the -adjoint operator of with superscript standing for the static case .

Noting that is depending on and the point source , we can denote by . Define by

\hb@xt@.01(4.10)

for three orthonormal vectors , and a constant unit vector . Here, is considered as a searching point in .

The following lemma follows from the Helmholtz-Kirchhoff identity for .

Lemma 4.2

The functional can be estimated by

\hb@xt@.01(4.11)

where .

Proof. Using (LABEL:eq:approx-u) and the above representations, the functional can be written as

Then we can write as

From the Sommerfeld radiation condition [5], we have

Since , the property of fundamental solution and Green’s identity imply

Hence we have

    

Since has a sinc function as a component, has its maximum at . In , the fundamental tensor of the Stokes problem, , can be replaced by a simple exponential function. Using that the following proposition proposes an approximation of which is more practical for finding the maximum and hence locating the anomaly.

Proposition 4.3

Define by

\hb@xt@.01(4.12)

Then the point satisfying is the center position of .

Proof. From the definition of in (LABEL:eq:fund_Stokes), we have

If , then the following approximation holds

with the identity matrix. Here, the phase terms of and are the same for the identity matrix . In fact, the phase term of is

in which the first approximation holds because imply that the angles between them are close to 0. Therefore, it has its maximum at .     

Proposition LABEL:prop:position shows that the conductivity anomaly can be detected with a resolution of the order of half the elastic wavelength.

4.2 Size estimation and reconstruction of the material parameters

In the previous subsection, a formula to find the center position of has been proposed. Here, we propose a method to estimate the size , the conductivity , and the shear modulus of the anomaly . For computational simplicity, we assume that is a sphere, the background conductivity, , and shear modulus, , are known.

Using a broadband frequency range for elastic vibrations, we can acquire time-domain data corresponding to for . Here, is the inverse Fourier transform taken in variable of the fundamental solution to the Stokes system. Take in (LABEL:eq:data_rep) and rewrite as a function of time . It follows that

\hb@xt@.01(4.13)

where

Define and by

Then the radius, , of can be estimated by

\hb@xt@.01(4.14)

If we know the size of then we can extract information. If not, we need further investigation as follows. We propose to minimize over and the following discrepancy functional

To compute we use relation (LABEL:eq:rel_r_mu) and the fact that with being the unit sphere centered at the origin.

5 Numerical Simulations

First, we will present numerical simulation results showing voltage differences when the mechanical vibration is applied. The second numerical simulation will show reconstructed images using the algorithm proposed in section LABEL:sec:PIR. Then, we will show a numerical evidence of the position finding formula proposed in subsection LABEL:subsec:position.

5.1 Simulations of the voltage difference map

We present two results of numerical simulations to show the voltage difference map of before and after the applied mechanical vibration. We consider a cubic container as shown in Table LABEL:fig:model. The sensing (measuring) electrodes are placed at the bottom of the container and the sinusoidal mechanical vibration is applied through the top surface, which is also the current driving electrode. In the second numerical test, the mechanical vibration is applied through the lateral surface. Two anomalies, a small spherical anomaly and a large cylindrical anomaly, are placed in the container with different material properties shown in Table LABEL:table:sim_1.

Figure 5.1: Model for numerical simulations.
Background Anomalies
Shear modulus 0.266 2.99
Table 5.1: Shear modulus values used in numerical simulations.

Figures LABEL:fig:diff_v presents the measured voltage difference at the bottom surface. It clearly shows the perturbation of the conductivity distribution inside caused by the mechanical vibration.

Figure 5.2: Maps of the voltage difference on the bottom surface subject to two different mechanical vibrations.

5.2 Image reconstruction

Based on the analysis in section LABEL:sec:model and the numerical evidence shown in subsection LABEL:sec:NA_vol, we reconstruct the perturbed conductivity distribution caused by the mechanical vibration using the algorithm introduced in section LABEL:sec:PIR. Let be a cubical domain such as in Figure LABEL:fig:Logan with size . Since we need two sets of measured voltage data when the current is injected through two different directions (the directions of current flow should be linearly independent each other), respectively, we employ the positions of driving electrodes as in Figure LABEL:fig:new_cont that use the whole lateral side as current injecting surface. Sensing electrodes in -array are placed on the bottom surface. Inside of the container, we placed eight objects as in Figure LABEL:fig:Logan. The admittivity of the background was and the anomalies had with kHz. The material coefficients for the elasticity equation were set to be the same as in Table LABEL:table:sim_1. We applied the mechanical vibration with the frequency of 100 Hz. Figure LABEL:fig:PIR1 shows the reconstructed images of the projected distribution of on the the sensing surface of the model in Figure LABEL:fig:Logan when the mechanical vibration is applied from the (a) top, (b) left, and (c) front sides, respectively.

Figure 5.3: Model for image reconstructions: ‘’ is the radius and ‘’ is the thickness of the object in cm.
Figure 5.4: Reconstructed images of the model in Figure LABEL:fig:Logan: mechanical vibration is applied from the (a) top surface, (b) side wall and (c) front wall.

5.3 Application to TAM

In this numerical test, we use the same configuration used in [30] as shown in Figure LABEL:fig:model_TAM. The computational domain is enlarged to the size of in order to attach current injecting electrodes while all the objects are at the same position as in Figure LABEL:fig:Logan with same material properties. Now current injecting electrodes are placed on the bottom surface which are still separated from voltage measuring sensing electrodes with size of .

Figure 5.5: Model for numerical simulations based on TAM model.

Also the mechanical vibration with the frequency of 100 Hz is applied through the top, side, and front surfaces. The reconstructed images are presented in Figure LABEL:fig:recon_TAM.

Figure 5.6: Reconstructed images using data collected from the model in Figure LABEL:fig:model_TAM: mechanical vibration is applied from the (a) top surface, (b) side wall and (c) front wall.

5.4 Anomaly location

In subsection LABEL:subsec:position, the formula (LABEL:eq:411) and Proposition LABEL:prop:position suggest to seek the maximizer of or to locate the center position of anomaly. To verify Proposition LABEL:prop:position, we consider a cylindrical domain centered at (0,0,1.5) with radius 7.5 cm and height 3 cm. Let the anomaly be a sphere with radius 0.25 cm, centered at . As shown in subsection LABEL:subsec:position, the displacement depends on and the point source . Here, is set to and and the point source is chosen for which are uniformly distributed on , a sphere centered at (0,0,1.5) with radius 37.5 cm so that . The Figure LABEL:fig:point_s shows the computed discrete version of for each as follows

where and .

Figure 5.7: when : The maximum point is the center position of which is (3.75,0,1.5): (a) Re() (b) Im() (c)

Figure LABEL:fig:point_s shows that the formula proposed in Proposition LABEL:prop:position finds the center position of anomaly under an ideal circumstance such that no noise is added and all mathematical assumptions are satisfied. An analysis, in the same spirit of [3], of the statistical stability with respect to medium and measurement noises of the localization algorithm will be the subject of a forthcoming work.

6 Concluding remarks

In this paper, we proposed a new multi-physics electrical impedance imaging approach using mechanical vibrations simultaneously applied to an imaging object together with current injections. We provided the mathematical framework for the proposed approach and presented a few numerical simulation results to illustrate its resolution and stability.

It is worth mentioning that the proposed approach can also be used to measure the elasticity of an internal object with known electrical conductivity values. Using the electrical conductivity image, one can reconstruct the displacement field at the scale of the changes of the conductivity and then, recover the shear modulus. This will be the subject of a forthcoming publication.

References

  • [1] H. Ammari, An Introduction to Mathematics of Emerging Biomedical Imaging, Vol. 62, Mathematics and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
  • [2] H. Ammari, P. Garapon, H. Kang, and H. Lee, A method of biological tissues elasticity reconstruction using magnetic resonance elastography measurements, Quart. Appl. Math., 66 (2007), 139–175.
  • [3] H. Ammari, J. Garnier, V. Jugnon, and H. Kang, Stability and resolution analysis for a topological derivative based imaging functional. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012), no. 1, 48-76.
  • [4] H. Ammari, L. Guadarrama Bustos, H. Kang, and H. Lee, Transient elasticity imaging and time reversal, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh A, 141 (2011), 1121–1140.
  • [5] H. Ammari, J. Garnier, W. Jing, H. Kang, M. Lim, K. Sølna, and H. Wang, Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Multistatic Imaging, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 2098, Springer, 2013.
  • [6] H. Ammari, P. Garapon, H. Kang, and H. Lee, Effective viscosity properties of dilute suspensions of arbitrarily shaped particles, Asymp. Anal., 80 (2012), 189–211.
  • [7] H. Ammari, H. Kang, M. Lim, and H. Zribi, Conductivity interface problems, Part I: small perturbations of an interface, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362 (2010), 2435–2449.
  • [8] H. Ammari, O. Kwon, J.K. Seo, and E.J. Woo, T-scan electrical impedance imaging system for anomaly detection, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 65 (2004), 252–266.
  • [9] M. Assenheimer, O. Laver-Moskovitz, D. Malobek, D. Manor, U. Nahliel, R. Nitzan, and A. Saad, The T-scan technology: electrical impedance as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection, Physiol. Meas., 22 (2001), 1–8.
  • [10] H. Benjamin, S. Bhansali, S.B. Hoath, W.L. Pickens, and R. Smallwood, A planar micro-sensor for bio-impedance measurements, Sens. Actuators B: Chemical, 111-112 (2005), 430–435.
  • [11] E. Beretta, E. Francini, and M.S. Vogelius, Asymptotic formulas for steady state voltage potentials in the presence of thin inhomogeneities. A rigorous error analysis, J. Math. Pures Appl., 82 (2003), 1277–-1301.
  • [12] E. Beretta, A. Mukherjee, and M.S. Vogelius, Asymptotic formulas for steady state voltage potentials in the presence of conductivity imperfections of small area, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 52 (2001), 543–572.
  • [13] Y.Z. Chen and L.C. Wu, Second Order Elliptic Equations and Elliptic Systems, Translated from the 1991 Chinese original by Bei Hu. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 174. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.
  • [14] C. Fabre and G. Lebeau, Régularité et unicité pour le problème de Stokes, Comm. Partial Diff. Equat., 27 (2002), 437–475.
  • [15] C. Fabre and G. Lebeau, Prolongement unique des solutions de l’q́uation de Stokes, Comm. Partial Diff. Equat., 21 (1996), 573–596.
  • [16] I. Giaever and C.R. Keese, Micromotion of mammalian cells measure electrically, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88 (1991), 7896–7900.
  • [17] M. Giaquinta and L. Martinazzi, An Introduction to the Regularity Theory for Elliptic Systems, Harmonic Maps and Minimal Graphs, Second edition. Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie), 11. Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2012.
  • [18] D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.
  • [19] A. Hartov, N. Soni, and A. Halter, Breast cancer screening with electrical impedance tomography Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications (Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing) (2005), 167–185.
  • [20] J. Jossinet and M. Schmitt, A review of parameters for the bioelectrical characterization of breast tissue, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 873 (1999), 30–41.
  • [21] S. Kim, J. Lee, J.K. Seo, E.J. Woo, and H. Zribi, Multifrequency trans-adimttance scanner: mathematical framework and feasibility, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 69 (2008), 22–36.
  • [22] E. Lee, J.K. Seo, E.J. Woo, and T. Zhang, Mathematical framework for a new microscopic electrical impedance tomography system, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 055008.
  • [23] Y.Y. Li and L. Nirenberg,Estimates for elliptic systems from composite material. Dedicated to the memory of Jürgen K. Moser, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 56 (2003), 892–925.
  • [24] C.L. Lin, G. Nakamura, and J.N. Wang, Optimal three-ball inequalities and quantitative uniqueness for the Lamé system with Lipschitz coefficients, Duke Math. J. 155 (2010), 189–204.
  • [25] P. Linderholm, R. Schoch, and Ph. Renaud, Microelectrical impedance tomography for biophysical characterization of thin film biomaterials, Transducers, Boston, MA. 2003
  • [26] J.H. Ortega and E. Zuazua, Generic simplicity of the eigenvalues of the Stokes system in two space dimensions, Adv. Differential Equations 6 (2001), 987–1023.
  • [27] J.K. Seo, O. Kwon, H. Ammari, and E.J. Woo, Mathematical framework and anomaly estimation algorithm for breast cancer detection: electrical impedance technique using TS2000 configuration, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 51 (2004), 1898–1906.
  • [28] J.K. Seo and E.J. Woo, Nonlinear Inverse Problems in Imaging, Wiley, 2013.
  • [29] J.E. Silva, J.P. Marques, and J. Jossinet, Classification of breast tissue by electrical impedance spectroscopy, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 38 (2000), 26–30.
  • [30] M.E. Ts, E. Lee, J.K. Seo, B. Harrach, and S. Kim, Projective electrical impedance reconstrucion with two measurements, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 73 (2013), 1659–1675.
  • [31] Z. Mingkang, H. Wi, A.H.M. Kamal, A.L. McEwan, E.J. Woo and T.I. Oh, High density trans-admittance mammography development and preliminary phantom tests, Biomed. Eng. Online., 11 (2012), 1–16.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
60100
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description