Magnetic excitations and optical transitions in the multiferroic spin-\frac{1}{2} system LiCu{}_{2}O{}_{2}

Magnetic excitations and optical transitions in the multiferroic spin- system LiCuO

D. Hüvonen    U. Nagel    T. Rõõm National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Akadeemia tee 23, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.    Y.J. Choi    C.L. Zhang    S. Park    S.-W. Cheong Rutgers Center for Emergent Materials & Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
July 12, 2019
Abstract

Magnetic excitations in cycloidal magnet LiCuO are explored using THz absorption spectroscopy in magnetic fields up to 12 T. Below the spin ordering temperature we observe eight optically active transitions in the spin system of LiCuO in the energy range from 4 to 30 cm. In magnetic field the number of modes increases and the electric polarization flop is seen as a change in magnetic field dependence of mode energies. The polarization dependence of two of the modes in zero magnetic field fits the selection rules for the cycloid tilted by from the bc plane. For the remaining six modes electric and magnetic dipole approximations cannot explain the observed polarization dependence. We do not see the electromagnon in the explored energy range although there is evidence that it could exist below 4 cm.

pacs:
75.30.Ds, 76.50.+g, 75.25.+z, 75.50.-y, 78.30.-j, 78.20.Ci
preprint: July 12, 2019

The coupling between magnetic and electric orders in multiferroic materials makes them attractive for technological applications. An especially interesting class of multiferroics (MF) are frustrated magnets, where the charge order is driven by the magnetic order Cheong and Mostovoy (2007) and even moderate magnetic fields are sufficient to select between different magnetic ground states and change the charge order due to magnetoelectric (ME) coupling. The ME interaction transfers part of the electric dipole moment of the charge-ordered state to the spin waves enhancing their ability to absorb electromagnetic waves, typically in the THz range.Katsura et al. (2007); Aguilar et al. (2009) A priori, the knowledge of the strength of the static ME coupling for a given material does not tell us the strength of the dynamic ME coupling. Therefore the exploration of THz properties is of interest to fully exploit MF materials.

The spin cycloid is an example of a frustrated magnetic structure where ME coupling is allowed. In the spin cycloid the electric polarization is induced either through the spin current Katsura et al. (2005) or the inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction mechanism.Sergienko and Dagotto (2006); Mostovoy (2006) In an one-dimensional chain of spins along the axis with spins rotating in the plane the electric polarization is perpendicular to the cycloidal ordering vector and perpendicular to the normal of the spin rotation plane, , see Fig. 1b. The orientation of the spin rotation plane is determined by anisotropic interactions, like easy plane anisotropy or DM interaction. Several multiferroic materials have a cycloidal spin order: , [Kimura et al., 2003; Goto et al., 2004; Kimura et al., 2005], [Lawes et al., 2005], LiCuO [Park et al., 2007], [Naito et al., 2007], and CuO [Kimura et al., 2008]. Among them, LiCuO was the first low spin, , system to show electric polarization in the cycloidal phase. Although LiCuO seems to be a good model system with prevailing one-dimensionality of its magnetism, the connection between the electric polarization and the underlying magnetic structure is not well understood.

The structure of LiCuO, shown in Fig. 1a, contains Cu-O chains extending along the crystallographic axis. The chains form a zig-zag Cu spin ladder with the ladder plane tilted out from the plane.Berger et al. (1992) The ladders in the planes, stacked along the axis, have an alternating tilt angle leading to two inequivalent ladders per unit cell. The first magnetic phase transition is at 24.6 K into the sinusoidal spin structure.Rusydi et al. (2008) An incommensurate cycloidal spin order with , driven by frustrated isotropic exchange interactions inside the ladders, appears in the second phase transitionRusydi et al. (2008); Masuda et al. (2004); Gippius et al. (2004) below 23 K together with spontaneous polarizationPark et al. (2007) . The knowledge about the orientation of the cycloid plane is controversial. Initially an plane cycloid was considered in the neutron scattering study.Masuda et al. (2004, 2005) However, the direction of together with the inverse DM mechanism dictates a plane cycloid.Park et al. (2007) A later study by Seki et al. Seki et al. (2008) confirmed the plane cycloid and . However, they found deviations from the cycloid in accord with the NMR study.Gippius et al. (2004) The presence of ME coupling in LiCuO is demonstrated by the flop of polarization from to if magnetic field  T is applied along axis.Park et al. (2007) Such a flop can be explained by invoking a ME coupling between two spin chains in neighboring ladder planes.Fang et al. (2009) Also, resonant soft x-ray magnetic scattering shows evidence that the inter-chain spin coupling along the direction is essential for inducing polarization.Huang et al. (2008)

Figure 1: (color online) (a) Crystal structure of LiCuO. Cu spins, joined by thick black lines, form a zig-zag spin ladder. (b) Cycloidal order of spins positioned along the axis, shown with thick solid arrows. Small arrows show the change to visualize the spin wave dynamics. The and modes change in direction and are drawn by blue arrows (solid line envelope) and red arrows (dashed line envelope), respectively. Green arrows in the plane show the mode.

Modes at wavevectors and couple to long-wavelength electromagnetic radiation within the linear spin wave model of a spin cycloid. They correspond, as shown in Fig. 1b, to the rotations of spins about three axes by small anglesKatsura et al. (2007). The rotation about the axis () costs no energy because the spins rotate within the easy plane, hence . Rotations about two other axes have finite energies, , the magnitude determined by the size of the easy plane anisotropy. The motion of spins induced by magnetic component of THz radiation is described by . Accordingly, all three modes are magnetic dipole active, excites and excites with equal intensity in zero field; excites although this mode has zero energy. In the presence of dynamic ME coupling the mode is excited by the electric component of THz radiationKatsura et al. (2007) and is referred to as the electromagnon.Pimenov et al. (2006) Thus, the orientation of the spin cycloid can be determined from the polarization dependence of THz absorption.

In this Communication we study magnetic field and polarization dependence of the THz absorption in the cycloidal phase of LiCuO. Our aim is to find the electromagnon, the orientation of the spin cycloid, and changes in the spin excitation spectrum upon the polarization flop in 2 T field. Previously only one THz absorption study on LiCuO has been reportedMihály et al. (2006), the experiment being limited to , where a peak at 12 cm with increasing energy in the field was found.

We use three single crystal samples from the same batch as in Ref. Park et al., 2007. Sample L1 has plane area of 6.16 mm and thickness of 0.75 mm in direction, L2 and L3 have plane areas 1.44 mm and 6.88 mm with thicknesses 1.75 mm and 4.3 mm in direction, respectively. Since the crystals are twinned in the plane, with a twin size of the order of 10 m, we use notation when referring to direction-sensitive physical properties. THz absorption spectra are recorded using a Martin-Puplett spectrometer with a 0.3 K bolometer and a rotatable polarizer in front of the sample.Rõõm et al. (2004)

Figure 2: (color online) Light absorption in LiCuO (sample L3) below 180 cm measured in (dashed red line) and (solid black line) polarizations. dependence of absorption, , is shown by differential absorption spectra in (b) and in the inset (c) .
Figure 3: (color online) Polarization dependence of absorption in LiCuO below 35 cm,  K,  T. (a) Differential absorption spectra are shown by curves and (b) absorption line areas from Lorentzian fits are given by symbols for following polarizations: black line and circles for is an average of spectra measured on samples L1 and L2; red line and down triangles for , sample L2; blue dashed line and up triangles for , sample L2. The letters from A to F in (a) label lines, see Table 1.

The absolute spectra in Fig. 2a show several strong phonon absorption lines. The differential spectrum in Fig. 2b shows that only the lines below 40  cm that disappear above the cycloidal ordering temperature  K are spin wave excitations. In the rest of the paper we use the 0 T spectrum at 30 K as a reference spectrum by subtracting it from the spectra measured in the given field and at lower .

Two peaks are emerging already in the 24 K spectrum in the sinusoidal phase and are easily seen at 23 K (Fig. 2c). As drops the peak energies go up and eventually at least six peaks can be seen in the 4 K spectrum. Higher resolution spectra show that the two strongest peaks at 12 and 24 cm are doublets, split by 0.8 cm, Fig. 3. This increases the total number of peaks to eight (Table 1). As is applied, Fig. 4, lines shift, change their intensity, and some split. In fields stronger than 5 T new modes, G and H, emerge into the spectral window from the low energy side, Fig. 4c. The expected number of optically active modes within the spin wave approximation is two, and . There are two spin chains in the unit cell and the coupling between the chains in direction may split C and E modes into C, C and E, E. In addition, if the cycloid is not circular, ellipticity activates otherwise optically silent modes at multiples of the ordering vector, .de Sousa and Moore (2008) However, the electric dipole active isotropic exchange modulation mechanism that couples light to the spin wave at Brillouin zone boundaryAguilar et al. (2009) is apparently not active because optically active spin modes in LiCuO are below 30 cm while the zone boundary energy of the spin waves in the direction is more than 60 cm, Ref. Masuda et al., 2005.

Table 1: Spin excitations observed in the THz absorption spectra of LiCuO in the order of increasing energies at  K and  T. Best fit Lorentzian parameters – center energy (cm), linewidth at half maximum (cm) and line area (cm) are listed for three different orientations of and .
Figure 4: (color online) dependence of THz absorption in LiCuO at 3.5 K. Differential absorption spectra (a) and , , sample L1 ; (b) , , , sample L2. Panel (c) has the results of Lorentzian fits where the area of the symbol is proportional to the absorption line area ; black empty circles and filled red circles . Black solid and dash-dot lines are eye guides, except line H which is a linear fit of line position as a function of .

The polarization dependence of THz absorption spectra is presented in Fig. 3 and fit results of the absorption lines are given in Table 1. Our measurement rules out both and plane spin cycloids within the selection rules discussed above and outlined in Fig. 1b. For the LiCuO crystal structure a model where there are two cycloids corresponding to two zig-zag chains, tilted out from the plane by an angle , seems natural. The absorption line area for the polarization becomes with standing for the line area when is in the cycloid plane. The factor 4 is two cycloids per unit cell times two twin domains. For in the plane the line area is where the first term in brackets is from domains and the second from domains. Lines C and E satisfy this model and give for the cycloid tilt angle which is close to crystallographic tilt angle of the zig-zag chains. But the tilted cycloid model does not explain the polarization dependence of other lines. Moreover, the magnetic and the electric dipole approximations do not hold for lines A, C and E. They are weakest when light propagates parallel to the axis and stronger when light propagates perpendicular to the axis. In the dipole approximation the absorption line area depends on the orientation of light polarization with respect to the crystal axes and not on the orientation of the vector of light. A possible explanation of this dependence is the circular dichroism or electric quadrupolar transitions, but this needs further theoretical study.

Two cases of magnetic resonance in helical structures have been treated theoretically in the spin wave approximation, perpendicular to the spin rotation plane and in the plane of spin rotation.Cooper et al. (1962); Cooper and Elliott (1963); Nagamiya (1967); kataoka (1987) These results cannot be directly adapted to our experiment since the magnetic field would be perpendicular to the cycloidal plane only for an or plane circular cycloid in LiCuO. Given the complexity and quantum nature of the problem, the theoretical description of spin wave modes in LiCuO is not within the scope of the current paper. The number of modes is larger in Fig.4b than in Fig. 4a because two crystal domains, and , contribute to the absorption; in twin domains are equal with respect to the field. Some changes are evident in the THz absorption spectra around 2 T, Fig. 4b. This is due to reordering of spins when flops from to axis. Line A splits between 1 and 2 T and lines C and C acquire dispersing modes C and C, Fig. 4c. We assign the C and C modes together with new modes A and D to domains where since this is the field direction where is flopped. There is some evidence, Fig. 4c, that A and G modes anti-cross and therefore the G mode may belong to the domains.

Electromagnons contribute to the zero frequency dielectric constant as , where the sum runs over all spin wave modes observed below 35 cm in the THz absorption spectrum, and are the -th mode resonance energy and plasma frequency, both in wavenumber units ( is related to line area by with refraction index for ); contains the contribution from all other modes above 35 cm and is taken -independent below 30 K.Papagno et al. (2006) Assuming that all the oscillator strength is due to electric dipole activity we can set an upper limit to using data from Table 1. A measurement at 28 kHz gave , Ref. Park et al., 2007, which is four times larger. However, the dependence shows (Fig. 4c) that there is an additional mode (H) which shifts into our measurement window at linear rate  cmT with a zero-field intercept at  cm. Assuming the same oscillator strength for the zero-field resonance as is above 5 T we get that the contribution of this 1 cm mode to the dielectric constant is . The actual number might be smaller because it is not known if, first, , and second, whether persists down to zero field. A mode at 1 cm, when extrapolated to 0 T, has been detected with an electron spin resonance technique although with nonlinear dependence.Vorotynov et al. (1998)

In conclusion, the analysis of the THz absorption spectra within the linear spin wave theory shows that the spin order is not nor plane cycloid. The cycloid tilt angle out of the plane is inferred from the polarization dependence of two modes assuming they are magnetic dipole active. For other modes the polarization dependence is not compatible with magnetic or electric dipole activity of a cycloidal spin chain. We have evidence that there is a spin wave mode at 1 cm with sufficient oscillator strength to be an electromagnon. Understanding the origin of the large number of optically active spin excitations and their interaction with magnetic field in a quantum spin system such as LiCuO requires further theoretical investigation.

We thank M. Mostovoy for useful discussions. Support by EstSF grants 5553, 6138, and 7011 is acknowledged. Work at Rutgers was supported by the DE-FG02-07ER46382.

References

  • Cheong and Mostovoy (2007) S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Nature Mater. 6, 13 (2007).
  • Katsura et al. (2007) H. Katsura, A. V. Balatsky, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 027203 (pages 4) (2007).
  • Aguilar et al. (2009) R. Valdés Aguilar, M. Mostovoy, A. B. Sushkov, C. L. Zhang, Y. J. Choi, S.-W. Cheong, and H. D. Drew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 047203 (2009).
  • Katsura et al. (2005) H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
  • Sergienko and Dagotto (2006) I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006).
  • Mostovoy (2006) M. Mostovoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601 (2006).
  • Kimura et al. (2003) T. Kimura et al, Nature 426, 55 (2003).
  • Goto et al. (2004) T. Goto, T. Kimura, G. Lawes, A. P. Ramirez, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 257201 (2004).
  • Kimura et al. (2005) T. Kimura, G. Lawes, T. Goto, Y. Tokura, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. B 71, 224425 (2005).
  • Lawes et al. (2005) G. Lawes et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087205 (2005).
  • Park et al. (2007) S. Park, Y. J. Choi, C. L. Zhang, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 057601 (2007).
  • Naito et al. (2007) Y. Naito et al, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 023708 (2007).
  • Kimura et al. (2008) T. Kimura et al, Nature Mater. 7, 291 (2008).
  • Berger et al. (1992) R. Berger et al, J. Alloys Compounds 184, 315 (1992).
  • Rusydi et al. (2008) A. Rusydi et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 262506 (2008).
  • Masuda et al. (2004) T. Masuda, A. Zheludev, A. Bush, M. Markina, and A. Vasiliev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177201 (2004).
  • Gippius et al. (2004) A. A. Gippius et al, Phys. Rev. B 70, 020406(R) (2004).
  • Masuda et al. (2005) T. Masuda et al, Phys. Rev. B 72, 014405 (2005).
  • Seki et al. (2008) S. Seki et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 127201 (2008).
  • Fang et al. (2009) C. Fang, T. Datta, and J. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014107 (2009).
  • Huang et al. (2008) S. W. Huang et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 077205 (2008).
  • Pimenov et al. (2006) A. Pimenov et al, Nature Physics 2, 97 (2006).
  • Mihály et al. (2006) L. Mihály, B. Dóra, A. Ványolos, H. Berger, and L. Forró, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 067206 (2006).
  • Rõõm et al. (2004) T. Rõõm, D. Hüvonen, U. Nagel, Y.-J. Wang, and R. K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144410 (2004).
  • de Sousa and Moore (2008) R. de Sousa and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 77, 012406 (2008).
  • Cooper and Elliott (1963) B. R. Cooper and R. J. Elliott, Phys. Rev. 131, 1043 (1963).
  • Cooper et al. (1962) B. R. Cooper et al, Phys. Rev. 127, 57 (1962).
  • Nagamiya (1967) T. Nagamiya, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich (Academic Press, New York, 1967), vol. 20 of Solid State Physics, pp. 305–Ž411.
  • kataoka (1987) M. Kataoka, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 56, 3635 (1987).
  • Papagno et al. (2006) M. Papagno et al, Phys. Rev. B 73, 115120 (2006).
  • Vorotynov et al. (1998) A. M. Vorotynov et al, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 86, 1020 (1998).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
164937
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description