1 Introduction

SNSN-323-63 July 13, 2019

Limits on Fourth Generation Fermions

Andrew Ivanov 111on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations

Department of Physics

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA

We present recent results on searches for the fourth generation quarks performed at the CMS and ATLAS experiments at LHC.

PRESENTED AT

Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference

Buzios, Rio, Brazil, May 20–24, 2013

## 1 Introduction

In the standard model of particle physics fermions are arranged in three generations. The sequential fourth generation is a simplest extension of the experimentally established standard model. Electroweak precision measurements favor small mass splitting between fourth generation quarks  [1, 2]. Assuming nearly diagonal structure of the CKM 44 matrix, the fourth generation quarks then preferentially decay as , and .

Discovery of the Higgs boson and recent measurements of the Higgs production cross section in various channels disfavor the chiral fourth generation, since this model predicts a specific hierarchy of signal strengths [3], which are not supported by experimental results [4, 5, 6], assuming a single Higgs boson. Nevertheless, they might remain viable in the scenarios with the extended Higgs sector [7, 8].

More interesting and well-motivated scenarios include an extra family of quarks with different quantum numbers than previous three generations of particles. So called vector-like quarks, where both chiralities have the same transformation properties under the electroweak symmetry group SU(2)U(1), appear in Little Higgs models [9], models with warped extra dimensions [10], as well as in non-minimal supersymmetric extensions [11]. These quarks cancel quadratic divergences in the Higgs mass induced by radiative corrections of top quark and resolve the hierarchy problem in the particle physics. The searches for these quarks represent a very active area of the experimental research at both CMS [12] and ATLAS [13] experiments. In this article we present recent results from the searches for extra family of quarks.

## 2 Vector-Like Quarks Phenomenology

Vector-like quarks can be produced at LHC in pairs via the strong interaction or singly via the electroweak interaction. Pair production cross sections are computed at approximate NNLO using HATHOR (Hadronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR) [14]. The single production depends on the unknown electroweak couplings of the new quarks. It has much milder dependence on the mass of new quarks, and it is expected to dominate the pair production at higher masses.

In most models the vector-like quarks couple to the 3rd generation quarks of the standard model. The flavor-changing-neutral-current decays are allowed, and at the tree level the vector-like quarks can decay into the following modes: , and . In some models the branching ratios into these modes is fixed, and is a function of the new heavy quark mass. If the quark is a weak-isospin singlet, all three decay modes are allowed, while for the weak-isospin doublet one of the decay products must be a neutral Z or Higgs boson [15].

## 3 Searches for Up-Type Quark

The decay is identical to the standard model top quark signature, and historically the tools used for the top quark event reconstruction were employed to searches for the heavy quark as well. For masses above 500 GeV, in a significant fraction of events a W-boson from decay is significantly boosted, and is often reconstructed as a single jet.

The ATLAS search [16] makes use of this fact, and consideres two types of hadronically decaying ’s: the single jet with transverse momentum GeV, and the jet mass consistent with the W boson, or the di-jet pair with 0.8 and GeV, and an invariant mass consistent with the W boson. The search is performed in the lepton plus jets channel with additional kinematic cuts improving sensitivity to the events. The mass of the heavy quark can be reconstructed, as it is shown in Figure 1 (left). The data shows no excess that can be attributed to the new heavy quark, and the mass of the quark below 656 GeV is excluded, assuming The results of this search can be interpreted as a limit on the branching ratio of , as a function of the mass. For GeV the branching ratio is excluded at 95% C.L.

The ATLAS search for  [17] is performed using a region orthogonal to the previous search. Events are classified based on the number of -tags (2,3 or ). The Figure 1 (right) shows the scalar transverse energy of all objects for events with -tags. The mass of the quark below about 850 GeV is excluded, assuming The results together with results from the previous search are interpreted as a limit on SU(2) doublet and SU(2) singlet quarks, which correspond to 790 and 640 GeV, respectively.

The events are associated with a high jet multiplicity, and this fact is employed in the CMS search [18] in the lepton plus jets channel. The fit to the scalar transverse energy of all objects per event is performed as a function of the jet multiplicity (see Figure 2), excluding masses for exclusive decays below 625 GeV at 95% C.L. The same results can be used for interpretation of the down-type quark decays and correspond to 675 GeV exclusion limits.

## 4 Searches for Down-Type Quark

One can enhance sensitivity to the down-type quark production by searching for leptonic decays of vector bosons. The CMS search [19] requires at least three soft leptons with GeV and at least one -tag, and classifies events based on the number of observed leptons, hadronic taus, -jets, and pairs of leptons consistent with boson. Overall, 240 exclusive channels are exploited. For the channels with sufficient statistics the fit to the variable is performed. This analysis sets 760 GeV and 660 GeV limits on mass of the quark for exclusive and decays, respectively. Assuming the quark decays into each or mode 50% of the time, the mass below 715 GeV is excluded at 95% C.L.

The ATLAS searched for the decays using same-sign charge dilepton events [20]. With expected in the signal region, and 15 events observed, the limit is 720 GeV. For GeV, the is excluded at 95% C.L.

## 5 Search for T5/3 Quark

The quark with an electric charge of appears in the standard model extensions with a custodial symmetry in the strong sector including a LR parity [21]. This quark decays dominantly into , making the search similar to the down-type quark searches, with an exception that same-sign charge bosons originate from the same .

CMS searched for using same-sign charge di-lepton events [22], and employing the jet substructure techniques to identify hadronically decaying -bosons and top quarks. In the signal region 6.6 2.0 events are expected from the standard model backgrounds, and 11 events are observed. This corresponds to the observed limit of 770 GeV at 95% C.L.

## 6 Inclusive Search for the Chiral 4th Generation Quark

The CMS performed an inclusive search for the chiral 4th generation in single-lepton, same-sign and opposite-sign dilepton and tri-lepton channels simultaneously [23]. For simplicity the CKM4 matrix is parametrized as shown in Figure 3, using a single parameter , that determines the single electroweak production cross section of the fourth generation quarks. Events are categorized based on the number of reconstructed bosons, and the fit to the is performed in each channel. As an example the distribution in the channel with single and three bosons is shown in Figure 4.

If , the fourth generation quarks with masses below 685 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L. The limit is more stringent if , and the single electroweak production is enhanced.

## 7 Search for Excited Top Quark t∗→tg

Some models speculate that the top quark is a composite particle and predict an excited top quark with a spin that decays into the standard model top and gluon [24]. CMS performed a search for this quark requiring one lepton, 6 and more jets, at least one of which is -tagged [25]. The mass of the quark is reconstructed using a kinematic fitter. The backgrounds are modeled using data-driven approach and with a good approximation can be fitted using function, as shown in Figure 4 (right). This analysis excludes an excited top quark with mass below 794 GeV.

## 8 Search for Excited Bottom Quark b∗→Wt

ATLAS performed a search for single quark production that is produced via chromomagnetic interaction, and has an electroweak decay to  [26]. The search is performed simultaneously in the single-lepton and di-lepton channels by fitting the data to the reconstructed mass and variables, respectively. The data-Monte Carlo agreement is shown in Figure 5. For the purely left-handed and a unit strength chromomagnetic coupling the 95% C.L limit is 870 GeV on the mass of the .

## 9 Summary

The results of searches for the fourth generation quarks are summarized in Table 1. This list is not exhaustive and more comprehensive searches based on the 20 fb dataset at 8 TeV pp collisions are underway at both CMS and ATLAS experiments.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank the organizers for the interesting and enjoyable conference.

## References

• [1] G. D. Kribs et al., Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007).
• [2] H. J. He, N. Polonsky, and S. Su, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007).
• [3] A. Denner et al., [arXiv:hep-ph/1111.6395] (2011).
• [4] O. Eberhardt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 241802.
• [5] CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 (2013).
• [6] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2012-170 (2013).
• [7] M. Geller et al., Phys. Rev. D 86, 115008 (2012).
• [8] N. Chen and H. J. He, JHEP 04 (2012) 062 (2012).
• [9] M. Schmaltz and D. Tucker-Smith, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 229 (2005).
• [10] R. Contino et al., JHEP 05 (2007) 074.
• [11] S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 86, 035017 (2012).
• [12] CMS Collaboration, JINST 3 S08004 (2008).
• [13] ATLAS Collaboration, JINST 3 S08003 (2008).
• [14] M. Aliev et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 1034.
• [15] F. del Aguilla et al., Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990) 1.
• [16] ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1284.
• [17] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2013-018 (2013).
• [18] CMS Collaboration, JHEP 01 (2013) 154.
• [19] CMS Collaboration, CMS-SUS-12-027 (2013).
• [20] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2013-051 (2013).
• [21] R. Contino and G. Servant, JHEP 06 (2008) 026.
• [22] CMS Collaboration, CMS-B2G-12-012 (2013).
• [23] CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 86, 112003 (2012).
• [24] U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 815.
• [25] CMS Collaboration, CMS-B2G-12-014 (2013).
• [26] ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 171.
Comments 0
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters

Loading ...
169157

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
• Keep your question short and to the point
• Check for grammar or spelling errors.
• Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description