Lifetime of Feshbach dimers in a Fermi-Fermi mixture of {}^{6}Li and {}^{40}K

Lifetime of Feshbach dimers in a Fermi-Fermi mixture of Li and K

M. Jag    M. Cetina [    R. S. Lous    R. Grimm Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation (IQOQI), Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria    J. Levinsen    D. S. Petrov School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia LPTMS, CNRS, Univ. Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
July 12, 2019
Abstract

We present a joint experimental and theoretical investigation of the lifetime of weakly bound dimers formed near narrow interspecies Feshbach resonances in mass-imbalanced Fermi-Fermi systems, considering the specific example of a mixture of Li and K atoms. Our work addresses the central question of the increase in the stability of the dimers resulting from Pauli suppression of collisional losses, which is a well-known effect in mass-balanced fermionic systems near broad resonances. We present measurements of the spontaneous dissociation of dimers in dilute samples, and of the collisional losses in dense samples arising from both dimer-dimer processes and from atom-dimer processes. We find that all loss processes are suppressed close to the Feshbach resonance. Our general theoretical approach for fermionic mixtures near narrow Feshbach resonances provides predictions for the suppression of collisional decay as a function of the detuning from resonance, and we find excellent agreement with the experimental benchmarks provided by our Li-K system. We finally present model calculations for other Feshbach-resonant Fermi-Fermi systems, which are of interest for experiments in the near future.

pacs:
34.50.-s, 05.30.Fk, 67.85.Lm, 67.85.Pq, 34.20.-b

Present address:] Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland Department of Physics and National Institute of Standards and Technology, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

I Introduction

The creation of weakly bound dimers near Feshbach resonances has led to major advances in the field of ultracold quantum gases Köhler et al. (2006); Ferlaino et al. (2009); Chin et al. (2010). Such Feshbach dimers have been the key to molecular Bose-Einstein condensation Jochim et al. (2003a); Greiner et al. (2003); Zwierlein et al. (2003) and to other applications, including the detection of atom pairs in strongly interacting fermionic superfluids Regal et al. (2004a); Zwierlein et al. (2004) and in optical lattices Thalhammer et al. (2006); Winkler et al. (2006); Meinert et al. (2013). The weakly bound dimers can also serve as an excellent starting point for accessing the complex level structure of more deeply bound states Lang et al. (2008a) and, in particular, for creating ground-state molecules Lang et al. (2008b); Ni et al. (2008); Danzl et al. (2010); Takekoshi et al. (2014); Molony et al. (2014); Park et al. (2015); Guo et al. (2016).

For many applications, the stability of the dimers is of crucial importance. In particular, collisional quenching to lower vibrational states can release an amount of energy that greatly exceeds the depth of the trapping potential, and thus results in immediate losses from the stored sample. A special situation can arise for bosonic dimers formed in a two-component sample of fermionic atoms close to a Feshbach resonance. Here, a Pauli suppression effect Petrov et al. (2004, 2005a, 2005b) can dramatically reduce collisional losses to lower vibrational states, rendering such dimers exceptionally stable and facilitating their highly efficient evaporative cooling. This Pauli suppression effect has been observed and studied in strongly interacting spin mixtures of Li Cubizolles et al. (2003); Jochim et al. (2003b) and K Regal et al. (2004b), which both exhibit broad resonances. This has paved the way to spectacular achievements, such as molecular Bose-Einstein condensation Jochim et al. (2003a); Greiner et al. (2003); Zwierlein et al. (2003), the experimental realization of the crossover to a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer-type superfluid Giorgini et al. (2008), and the exploration of the universal properties of resonantly interacting Fermi gases Zwerger (2011).

A central question for experiments exploring the many-body physics of fermionic mixtures is how far this suppression extends to mixtures of different species, featuring mass imbalance and narrow resonances. Theoretical investigations have considered the important roles of the mass ratio Petrov et al. (2005b); Marcelis et al. (2008) and of the resonance width Levinsen and Petrov (2011). The combination of Li and K atoms Taglieber et al. (2008); Wille et al. (2008); Tiecke et al. (2010); Naik et al. (2011); Trenkwalder et al. (2011) is the only Fermi-Fermi mixture with tunable interactions that has been experimentally realized so far and thus is the only available heteronuclear system that can provide experimental benchmarks. Dimers composed of Li and K atoms have been observed at LMU Munich in Ref. Voigt et al. (2009), including preliminary lifetime studies, as well as in various recent experiments in Innsbruck Kohstall et al. (2012); Jag et al. (2014).

In this Article, we present a joint experimental and theoretical investigation of the lifetime and decay properties of Feshbach dimers formed in a mixture of Li and K atoms. In Sec. II, we describe the basic procedures for creating and investigating pure samples of Feshbach dimers and atom-dimer mixtures near a Feshbach resonance. In Sec. III, we report on the measurements of spontaneous dissociation and of inelastic collisions in optically trapped dimer samples and in atom-dimer mixtures. Our results demonstrate the suppression of losses near the Feshbach resonance, but much weaker than that reported in Ref. Voigt et al. (2009) . In Sec. IV, we present theoretical calculations based on the approach of Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011) and find very good agreement with our observations. Finally, anticipating the creation of new mixtures, we present predictions for other Fermi-Fermi combinations with different mass ratios.

Ii Experimental Procedures

ii.1 Feshbach resonances

We employ two different Li-K interspecies Feshbach resonances (FRs). The first resonance has been widely used in our previous work on Fermi-Fermi mixtures, including the observation of the hydrodynamic expansion of a strongly interacting mixture Trenkwalder et al. (2011), the investigation of polarons Kohstall et al. (2012); Cetina et al. (2015, 2016), and the study of K-LiK atom-dimer interactions Jag et al. (2014). This resonance occurs near G (width G) with lithium in its lowest Zeeman sub-level Li (, ) and potassium in its third-lowest sub-level K (, ). The other resonance occurs near G (width G) with Li and K in their lowest-energy spin states Li and K (, ), respectively We use the latter, narrower resonance for comparison as it has the advantage of an absence of any Li-K two-body losses.

The dependence of the Li-K -wave scattering length on the magnetic field near a FR can be described by the standard expression Chin et al. (2010) with the relevant background scattering length , the width , and the resonance center . In Table 1 we summarize the values of these parameters for both resonances. To fully characterize the FRs, we also present the differential magnetic moments between the relevant open and closed channels. From these parameters, we derive the length parameter Petrov (2004), characterizing the coupling strength between the open and the closed channel. Here represents the Li-K reduced mass. The values for and have been obtained from a coupled-channels calculation Naik et al. (2011). The values for as well as for the Li-K FR were experimentally determined, with very high accuracy, as described in Ref. Cetina et al. (2015). For near the Li-K FR we use the data obtained from a coupled-channels calculation Naik et al. (2011) and for we use the value of an independent experimental determination Jag et al. ().

Channel
(G) () (G) (MHz/G) ()
LiK 154.708(2) 63.0 0.88 2.35 2 650
LiK 157.530(3) 65.0 0.14 2.3 16 500
Table 1: Parameters characterizing the two Feshbach resonances. We summarize the values from Refs. Cetina et al. (2015); Naik et al. (2011); Jag et al. () for the position , background scattering length , and width , as well as for the differential magnetic moment . The values given for include a small shift (mG) induced by the trapping-laser light Cetina et al. (2015).

ii.2 Sample preparation

Our procedure to prepare LiK-dimer samples is essentially the same as the one described in Ref. Jag et al. (2014). To produce LiK dimer samples, we slightly adapt this procedure to account for the narrower character of the FR. In both cases, the starting point for our experiments is an optically trapped and thermally equilibrated mixture of typically Li atoms and approximately K atoms at a temperature of nK and at a magnetic field of G. We reach these conditions by a preparation procedure described in detail in Ref. Spiegelhalder et al. (2010). The cigar-shaped optical confinement of the atom mixture, realized by two 1064-nm laser-light beams intersecting at an angle of about , is characterized by the radial and axial trap frequencies Hz and Hz for the K and Hz and Hz for the Li atoms. At this stage, all Li atoms are in their lowest Zeeman sub-level Li and all K atoms are in their second-lowest sub-level K (, ).

The subsequent preparation steps differ depending on the Li-K spin-state combination from which the dimers are created. To prepare for the creation of LiK (LiK) dimers from these mixtures, we slowly ramp the magnetic field over s to a value of G (G), approximately mG (mG) above the center of the FR. Here, we transfer all K atoms into the K (K) state by a radio-frequency rapid adiabatic passage.

We then associate approximately LiK dimers by a Feshbach ramp Köhler et al. (2006); Chin et al. (2010). To associate dimers from the Li-K mixture, we do this in two steps, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). In a first step, we ramp the magnetic field to mG in ms, which is sufficiently slow for the Li atoms to be attracted into the regions of high K density, increasing the density overlap between the two clouds. This is followed by the second step, in which we quickly ramp the magnetic field to mG in ms. For the Li-K mixture, we associate the dimers by a single -ms Feshbach ramp to a magnetic field mG, since here, at the much narrower FR, it is very hard to optimize a two-step ramping procedure. Typical dimer numbers of LiK samples are roughly larger than the typical numbers of LiK samples.

Figure 1: (Color online) Schematic of the preparation of a pure LiK dimer sample. (a) Starting from the magnetic field mG, we approach the resonance by a first 20-ms ramp to mG (last ms shown). Then, we associate dimers by a quick (ms) ramp across the FR to a magnetic field mG. Here, within ms (gray shaded), we remove unbound K and Li atoms from the sample. After this cleaning procedure we reach the final magnetic field , at which we perform the lifetime measurement, by a -s ramp (dotted line). (b) The cleaning procedure for both Li and K consists of radio-frequency pulses (solid black), selectively transferring unbound atoms into another spin state, and successive removal of these atoms from the trap by a resonant laser-light pulse (dotted red). This cleaning procedure is repeated one more time to increase the purity of the dimer sample.

To obtain pure dimer samples we apply cleaning sequences to remove unbound atoms. For the LiK samples, this sequence consists of a combination of radio-frequency (rf) and laser-light pulses; see Fig. 1(b). A 100-s rf -pulse selectively transfers the free Li atoms from the Li state into the Li state. A subsequent -s laser pulse selectively removes the Li atoms from the trap. Simultaneous with this Li-cleaning procedure, we remove the unbound K atoms in a similar way. Applying two rf -pulses with durations of s and s, we transfer the free K atoms into the K state, and successively remove them from the trap by applying a laser-light pulse resonant to the K atoms. As these cleaning procedures remove about of the free Li and K atoms, they are repeated one more time to clean the respective states more thoroughly. For the LiK samples, the Li cleaning is identical to the one explained above and the K cleaning is only slightly adapted. We revert the order of the 80-s and 40-s rf -pulses to transfer the free K atoms into the K state and we then apply a laser pulse resonant to the K atoms to remove them from the trap. After the cleaning procedure, we quickly, within s, ramp the magnetic field to its variable final value, at which we then perform the measurements.

ii.3 Dimer detection and dimer-temperature determination

We determine the LiK-dimer numbers from absorption images of Li and K atoms after dissociation of the dimers into Li-K pairs by a reverse Feshbach ramp Köhler et al. (2006); Chin et al. (2010). For both resonances we ramp the magnetic field up to a value mG within s. After an additional wait time of a few s, we simultaneously take absorption images of the Li and the K cloud, from which we determine the numbers of Li and K atoms. In some measurements, we detected only the number of Li atoms remaining after the reverse Feshbach ramp.

The temperature of the dimers is determined from Gaussian fits to absorption images of the clouds after a time-of-flight expansion duration of ms. The procedure is discussed in detail in Ref. Jag et al. (2014). From the measured radial width , we obtain the dimer temperature from , where is the mass of a Li-K dimer. Typically, the temperatures of our dimer samples are about nK. This corresponds to peak phase-space densities of about for typical dimer number densities in our samples. We explain the increased temperature of our dimer cloud compared to the temperature prior to the dimer association (nK) by heating and collective excitations caused by our preparation procedure Jag et al. (2014).

Iii Measurements of Dimer Decay

In this Section, we present measurements characterizing various processes that lead to losses of LiK dimers. In Sec. III.1, we first discuss spontaneous dissociation, which, being a one-body process, can also occur in very dilute samples. In Secs. III.2 and III.3, we then present our experimental results on dimer-dimer collisions and atom-dimer collisions, which, as two-body processes, limit the lifetime of dense samples.

iii.1 Spontaneous dissociation

A dimer created from an atom pair with at least one atom in an excited Zeeman state can spontaneously decay via processes mediated by the coupling between the two spins Chin et al. (2010). Such decay has previously been studied theoretically and experimentally for the case of Rb molecules Köhler et al. (2005); Thompson et al. (2005). Our LiK dimers are also subject to this decay process, in contrast to the LiK combination. The spontaneous decay of LiK dimers has been theoretically investigated in detail in Ref. Naik et al. (2011), where predictions for the lifetimes of the dimers were obtained from coupled-channels calculations.

Figure 2: (Color online) Comparison of the dimer number evolution near the Li-K and the Li-K FR. The blue squares show a typical decay curve of a LiK-dimer sample at mG. Fitting an exponential decay to the data yields the 1/e-lifetime ms. The fit is represented by the blue solid line. The results from similar measurements with a LiK-dimer sample at a magnetic detuning of mG from the respective resonance center, are shown as the red triangles. Here, we observe the dimer number to remain essentially constant. A fit of an exponential decay to the data (red solid line) is consistent with infinite lifetime. The error bars represent uncertainties; in some cases they are smaller than the symbol size.

We experimentally investigate the lifetime of LiK with respect to spontaneous decay using dimer samples with a very low number density, so that density-dependent collisional losses do not play a significant role. We realize such dilute dimer samples by allowing the optically trapped dimer cloud to expand after switching off the trap. After a variable expansion time , we determine the molecule number in the sample. Note that the 1064-nm light induces a shift of the FR center , as described in Ref. Cetina et al. (2015). When the optical trap is off, the FR center of the Li-K resonance is found at G, i.e. mG lower than in the trap (Table 1). For the Li-K channel we assume the same small shift.

In Fig. 2 we show a typical decay curve of a LiK-dimer sample, recorded at a magnetic detuning mG (blue squares). For our analysis, we only consider data obtained for ms, where the mean dimer number density in the sample is below , low enough for collisional losses to play a negligible role. To these data we fit a simple exponential decay, , with the initial dimer number and the lifetime as free parameters. For the specific example of Fig. 2, this procedure yields ms and the fit result is shown as the blue solid line.

For comparison, we also show the evolution of the number of LiK dimers recorded mG below the center of the Li-K resonance (red triangles). Here, the spontaneous decay mechanism is absent. Indeed, we observe an essentially constant number of LiK dimers, with the fit yielding the decay rate s. This result is essentially consistent with an infinite lifetime and, at a confidence level, provides a lower bound of ms.

Figure 3: (Color online) Lifetime of dimers against spontaneous decay near the Li-K FR. The data points show the experimental results and the black solid line represents the theoretical prediction from Ref. Naik et al. (2011). While the filled symbols are obtained from decay curves, where both the Li and the K component have been imaged after dissociation, the open symbols are based on detecting K alone. The error bars represent the 1 fit uncertainties.

In Fig. 3, the blue circles show the measured lifetimes of the dimers with respect to spontaneous decay over a wide range of magnetic detunings . Comparing our experimental results to the predictions from Ref. Naik et al. (2011) (black solid line), we find an excellent agreement over the whole magnetic field range investigated. While for magnetic detunings of around a few hundred mG the lifetime is about ms, we in particular confirm the predicted substantial increase near the FR, where we determine lifetimes approaching ms. This increase can be attributed to the increasing halo character of the dimer wave function as the FR is approached. This leads to a decreased probability to find a pair of Li and K atoms within the short range where the spin coupling occurs Naik et al. (2011). Our measurements of the lifetime of the LiK dimers in dilute samples can be fully understood in terms of spontaneous dissociation.

iii.2 Dimer-dimer collisions

In a second series of experiments, we investigate the collisional decay of a trapped dimer cloud. In collisions with other dimers our shallowly bound dimers can relax into more deeply bound states. The binding energy that is released in this process is much larger than the depth of the trapping potential, and thus the relaxation products are always lost from the trap. This two-body decay occurs at a rate , which is equal to the product of the dimer-dimer two-body loss-rate coefficient and the dimer number density .

Figure 4: (Color online) Comparison of the decay of a trapped and an expanding LiK-dimer sample. The blue squares show the measured dimer number in a trapped sample versus hold time in the trap. The red triangles show the dimer number determined in a dilute, expanding sample, ms after release from the trap. The blue and red lines correspond to the fit of our model to the data without and with two-body decay (see text). To enable a direct comparison, the experimental data are normalized to the initial dimer number (15300) obtained from the fit to the data acquired from the trapped (expanding) sample. The error bars represent uncertainties; in some cases they are smaller than the symbol size.

To experimentally determine the rate coefficient for these collisional decay processes, we investigate the decay of a trapped sample of dimers. The initial number of typically dimers corresponds to an initial number density of about cm, where is the effective volume of a thermalized sample, and Hz is the mean dimer trapping frequency Not (a). After a hold time at a magnetic field we measure the number of dimers, , remaining in the sample. In Fig. 4 we show an example for a decay curve obtained at a magnetic detuning of mG from the Li-K FR (blue squares).

We model the decay with the common loss-rate equation

(1)

Under the assumption that the sample remains in thermal equilibrium at the initial temperature , this differential equation has the solution

(2)

We fit Eq. (2) to the experimental data to extract the loss-rate coefficient . While and are free parameters, we fix to the corresponding theoretical value, which was verified in the independent measurements presented before. For the data of Fig. 4, the fit result is shown as the blue solid line. For comparison, we also show the decay curve of a dilute dimer sample, where collisional loss is absent (red triangles), together with the result of a fit of a simple exponential decay to this data (red line). Our measurements show that, under typical experimental conditions, the collisional relaxation and the spontaneous dissociation give similar contributions to the total decay of the trapped dimer sample.

The given values for the loss coefficients are subject to a systematic error arising from an uncertainty in the dimer number density. We estimate a combined systematic error of about 40%, arising from largely uncorrelated uncertainties of 25%, 7%, and 20% in the dimer number, the dimer trapping frequencies, and the dimer temperature, respectively. Furthermore, by assuming a constant temperature of the decaying dimer sample, and thus a constant in Eq. (1), we neglect a small effect of anti-evaporation heating Weber et al. (2003). We have checked that including the latter into our analysis would lead to slightly larger values for . We found this correction to stay well below .

We determine the values for the loss coefficient at various magnetic detunings. Our experimental results, obtained with LiK (LiK) dimer samples, are shown in Fig. 5 as the blue circles (red squares). For the LiK dimer samples we obtain values for the loss-rate coefficient of roughly cm/s without significant dependence on the magnetic detuning. Also for the LiK dimer samples we obtain roughly the same value for detunings mG. At these large magnetic detunings, the Feshbach molecules have a very small admixture of the entrance channel and are thus strongly closed-channel dominated. As we discuss in more detail in Sec. IV, the decay of such molecules is largely independent of the exact state they are in Staanum et al. (2006); Zahzam et al. (2006); Gao (2010); Julienne et al. (2011); Quéméner et al. (2011), which explains why the measurements for both FRs at large detunings result in nearly the same values.

As the Li-K resonance is approached, our experimental results (with the exception of one clear outlier Not (b)) show a reduction of collisional losses, which we interpret in terms of the Pauli-suppression effect. For our data points closest to resonance (about mG detuning), this suppression effect amounts to more than a factor of three. Note that measurements closer to resonance are prevented by the onset of collisional dissociation Jochim et al. (2003b).

Figure 5: (Color online) Measured loss-rate coefficient for inelastic dimer-dimer collisions as a function of magnetic detuning. The blue circles (red squares) correspond to the experimental results obtained with samples of LiK (LiK) dimers. The filled symbols correspond to results we obtained when determining the molecule number from both Li and K absorption images. Open circles (squares) represent fit results based on analyzing Li (K) images alone. The error bars represent the 1 fit uncertainties; in some cases they are smaller than the symbol size. We show the light blue and a light red line as guides to the eye.

iii.3 Atom-dimer collisions

In another set of experiments, we study the decay of dimers arising from their collisions with Li atoms in a mixture of LiK dimers and Li atoms. Such decay occurs at a rate , equal to the product of the Li atom dimer loss coefficient and the Li density . The measurement of atom-dimer collisions is challenging because the corresponding decay has to be distinguished from both the spontaneous decay and the dimer-dimer collisional decay.

We realize mixtures of Li atoms and LiK dimers by adapting the preparation procedure presented in Sec. II.2. Here we start with the lithium component in a nearly balanced spin mixture of Li and Li. The Feshbach ramp then produces a mixture of Li-K dimers, some remaining Li atoms, and the unaffected Li atoms. Then, at mG, we apply only one radio-frequency pulse, which exchanges the populations of the Li and Li states. We subsequently remove the Li atoms from the trap using a laser-light pulse. All other preparation steps, in particular the K spin state cleaning, remain as described in Sec. II.2. After this procedure, the number density distribution of the Li atoms in the trap, , can be well approximated by the density of a noninteracting Fermi gas at a temperature equal to the initial Li temperature. Typically, we obtain samples of dimers and a mildly degenerate Fermi sea of Li atoms at a temperature that is about 55% of the Fermi temperature. This corresponds to a mean dimer density of and a Li density averaged over the dimer distribution Cetina et al. (2016), , of about .

To experimentally determine the rate coefficient , we again investigate the decay of dimers from our sample. We ramp the magnetic field to a desired value and, after a variable hold time , we measure the number of dimers, , remaining in the sample. For each decay curve in the atom-dimer mixture we record a corresponding reference curve in a pure dimer sample. These reference measurements, which independently provide the dimer-dimer loss coefficient , are the ones that we have presented in the preceding section. To minimize systematic errors resulting from long-term drifts of the experiment, the measurements in the atom-dimer mixtures and the pure dimer samples are carried out in alternating order.

We model the decay of dimers with a simple extension of the decay model from the previous section. Our Li sample is much larger than the dimer sample, such that losses from the Li sample can be neglected. In this case, the Li sample represents a constant-density bath and the loss of dimers arising from Li atom dimer collisions appears as a one-body loss, which we include into our model by adding to the right-hand side of Eq.(1). Under these assumptions, the solution of our model is given by substituting with in Eq.(2). We fit this solution to our experimental data to determine the Li atom dimer loss coefficient . For the fit, we fix to the corresponding theoretical value and the decay coefficient to the value we determined in the corresponding reference measurement on a pure dimer sample.

Figure 6: (Color online) Measured loss-rate coefficient for inelastic Li atom dimer collisions as a function of the magnetic detuning. The blue circles (red squares) correspond to the experimental results obtained with samples of LiK (LiK) dimers co-trapped with Li atoms. In these experiments, the dimer number was determined from the K absorption images only. The error bars include the combined fit uncertainties (see text).

In Fig. 6, we show our results for the Li atom dimer loss coefficient at various magnetic detunings. The blue circles (red squares) correspond to data acquired with a LiK (LiK) dimer sample. The error bars reflect the 1 fit uncertainty of as well as the contribution arising from the uncertainty in our determination of . We obtain atom-dimer loss-rate coefficients of roughly cms near the LiK FR, where the molecules have closed-channel character. The data obtained with LiK dimers show a suppression of atom-dimer collisional losses, which becomes stronger as we approach the FR and the open-channel fraction of the dimers increases. The data point at a magnetic detuning of about mG already shows a suppression by a factor of roughly five. From the data point at mG, we determine a negative loss coefficient. We speculate that this unphysical result is due to the repulsive mean-field interaction between the dimers and the Li atoms, effectively increasing the cloud sizes and therefore decreasing the mean densities of the dimers and the Li atoms. Such an effect is beyond the assumptions of the model underlying our data analysis and can therefore produce unphysical results. We estimate that all other values, taken at larger detunings, do not suffer from such interaction effects. The observed suppression of atom-dimer collisional losses appears very similar to the effect observed in dimer-dimer decay, and can also be attributed to the Pauli suppression effect.

iii.4 Summary of experimental results and comparison with previous work

Our experimental results characterize three different loss processes of LiK dimers close to a Feshbach resonance. Spontaneous dissociation was identified as a density-independent one-body loss mechanism. This process is possible for Feshbach molecules composed of atoms that are not in the energetically lowest combination of spin states. For the case of the 155-G resonance in the Li-K mixture, this limits lifetimes to values below ms for typical experimental conditions. We have also investigated losses due to inelastic collisions in pure dimer samples, and obtained loss-rate coefficients of typically cm/s. At the typical densities of near-degenerate molecular samples, the corresponding loss rate is similar to the effect of spontaneous dissociation. Additional losses occur in atom-dimer mixtures, as we have shown for the example of free excess Li atoms.

Very close to the resonance center, in a roughly 100-mG wide range, we observe a suppression of loss in both spontaneous and collisional decays. In the former case, the suppression is a direct consequence of the halo character of the molecular wavefunction Köhler et al. (2005); Thompson et al. (2005); Naik et al. (2011). In the latter case, the suppression effect can be attributed to Pauli blocking Petrov et al. (2004, 2005b), as we will discuss in more detail in Sec. IV. For the specific FR employed in the Li-K mixture, the suppression of loss only leads to an increase of dimer lifetimes by up to a factor of three.

Weakly bound LiK dimers have been created in previous work by the Munich-Singapore group Voigt et al. (2009); Costa et al. (2010), who investigated lifetime properties without distinguishing between different processes. Below the FR center, their observations are consistent with our results and can be understood as a combination of spontaneous and collisional losses. Above the FR center, in a 100-mG wide range, the Munich-Singapore work reports on molecules with lifetimes of more than ms Voigt et al. (2009). These long lifetimes were later interpreted in terms of a many-body effect Costa et al. (2010). In our present work, using the same FR, we do not observe any molecules above resonance. In our previous work Kohstall et al. (2012), with K impurities in a degenerate Li Fermi sea, we indeed observed indications of many-body pairs above resonance, though restricted to a narrow, less than 20-mG wide magnetic-field range. For the 155-G FR in the Li-K mixture, we cannot confirm the existence of long-lived (ms) molecules.

Iv Theoretical Analysis of Relaxation Rates

In this section we present a theoretical description of atom-dimer and dimer-dimer relaxation processes near a narrow resonance. The model has been introduced in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011) for characterizing atom-dimer and a subset of the dimer-dimer inelastic channels. In Sec. IVA, we extend the discussion to all relevant dimer-dimer relaxation processes. In Sec. IVB, we then compare the theory with our experimental results and find a very good agreement.

iv.1 Theoretical model

The collisional decay requires at least three atoms to approach each other to within distances comparable to the van der Waals range of the interatomic interactions (we call this the “recombination region”). For the Li-K interaction, the van der Waals range takes the value Naik et al. (2011). In relaxation channels involving three atoms, two atoms form a deeply bound state and the large binding energy is released as kinetic energy. As the central point of our model, the probability of such a relaxation event may be calculated within a theory that only describes the few-body kinematics at length scales greatly exceeding , the short-range relaxation physics being characterized by the loss-rate constant for collisions of atoms with closed-channel (cc) molecules. One can show Levinsen and Petrov (2011) that in the narrow-resonance limit, , three atoms enter the recombination region predominantly as a free atom and a cc molecule rather than three free (open-channel) atoms. Thus, the recombination process is microscopically the relaxation in collisions of cc molecules with atoms. We assume that the corresponding interaction is not resonant and is characterized by a coupling constant , where is the atom-molecule reduced mass. The atom-cc molecule relaxation rate constant equals . This relation can be derived by relating the lifetime of the atom and cc molecule to the imaginary part of their mean-field interaction energy shift in unit volume. The “bare” relaxation rate constant is an external parameter of our theory.

In our approach, the atom-dimer relaxation rate constant factorizes into the product

(3)

where the dependence on the short-range physics is fully absorbed into and the long-range kinematics enters as the probability of finding an atom and cc molecule in the recombination region. This probability can be interpreted as the reduction of atom-dimer relaxation at finite and we refer to it as the “suppression function”, . It depends only on and is proportional to the squared modulus of the atom-dimer wave function calculated under the assumption . The task of computing the normalization integral for this wave function, which is quite complex (particularly, in the four-body case discussed below) and contains closed- and open-channel components, can be avoided by using an equivalent diagrammatic formulation of the problem, see Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011) where this approach was used for K-(K-Li) collisions. Namely, we calculate the atom-dimer scattering length perturbatively to first order in and deduce the atom-dimer relaxation rate constant from . The suppression function is shown in Fig. 7(a) for the case of a light atom (A=Li) and for a heavy atom (A=K). It is seen how the relaxation can be substantially reduced for , and that the suppression is stronger in the collision of the heavy K atom with the dimer.

Figure 7: (Color online) Suppression functions for relaxation in (a) atom-dimer and (b) dimer-dimer collisions.

In molecule-molecule collisions there are three possible relaxation channels: the Li-cc molecule, K-cc molecule, and cc molecule-cc molecule relaxation (we call it four-atom mechanism). The latter originates from inelastic collisions of cc molecules with each other involving no free atoms. This configuration dominates the four-body wave function when all four atoms are at distances smaller than . We assume that three coupling constants , , and are proportional to the corresponding van der Waals ranges which are small compared to and . This allows us to treat these interactions independently as first-order perturbations on top of the zero-order solution – the properly normalized four-body wave function calculated for . The contribution of a relaxation channel, say Li-cc molecule channel, to the total dimer-dimer relaxation rate constant is the product of and the probability to find a Li atom close to a cc molecule in dimer-dimer collisions. The quantity , which is not to be confused with defined for atom-dimer collisions, can in principle be calculated from the squared modulus of the zero-order four-body wave function by integrating it over the coordinates of one K atom (for the Li-cc molecule loss channel) and taking into account combinatorial factors (choice between two Li atoms). However, as in the atom-dimer case, we calculate the dimer-dimer scattering length to first order in , , and and deduce the dimer-dimer relaxation rate constant from . The total relaxation rate constant in dimer-dimer collisions is written in the form

(4)

The function has been computed in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011). Here we calculate and , as described in the Appendix. We show these functions together in Fig. 7(b); again we see how collisional losses can be strongly suppressed for , and that relaxation losses originating from light atoms and cc molecules are more important than those from heavy atoms and cc molecules.

Let us now discuss the limiting case of large detuning, . Neglecting the open-channel population we obtain and , where A=Li,K. Note that is not equal to , which is defined for atom-molecule collisions and tends to 1 in the large limit. As expected, these results mean that and . For large but finite we can perturbatively take into account the probability to be in the open channel arriving at and .

In the opposite limit of small detuning, , the feature of particular interest is the suppression of collisional relaxation which arises from the large open-channel probability combined with Pauli suppression: The inelastic process requires at least three atoms – of which two are identical fermions – to approach each other. More precisely, the Pauli suppression mechanism is efficient at distances (hyperradii) , which is called the universal region, where the atoms behave as free (open-channel) atoms. At shorter distances the three-atom configuration changes to the atom plus cc molecule one which is insensitive to the statistical suppression. This argument applies to the atom-cc molecule relaxation mechanism in both atom-dimer and dimer-dimer collisions, thus suppressed by the factor

(5)

The exponent characterizes the three-body wave function in the universal region and depends on the masses, quantum statistics of atoms, and the total angular momentum (the subscript means ) Not (c). For the relevant cases of Li (K) atoms scattering on LiK dimers we have (), respectively Levinsen and Petrov (2011). The onset of the power-law suppression can be seen in Fig. 7.

For , the four-atom loss mechanism is also suppressed. This suppression has the same origin (Pauli principle) as in the three-atom case: Four atoms consisting of two pairs of identical fermions have to approach each other to the recombination region. In this case we have . Here the power characterizes the scaling of the four-atom wave function in the universal region and can be inferred from the energy of four trapped fermions at unitarity: Reference von Stecher et al. (2008) gives and for mass ratios of 1, 4, and 8, respectively. Our calculation for the LiK mass ratio is consistent with this sequence.

iv.2 Comparison with experimental data

Here we compare our theoretical predictions for the collisional loss-rate coefficients to our measured values, which we already presented in Figs. 5 and 6. In our theoretical model, the three bare rate constants , , and are free parameters, and they can in principle be determined by fitting to the experimental data. Alternatively, estimates can be obtained from a simple quantum Langevin model Gao (2010); Julienne et al. (2011); Quéméner et al. (2011). This model uses only the van der Waals range of the corresponding atom-dimer or dimer-dimer interaction potential and assumes total absorption (loss) at shorter distances.

For collisions of Li atoms with LiK dimers, the comparison is straightforward, since is the only free parameter, which enters as a prefactor according to Eq. (3). Accordingly, we fit to the experimental data and extract the value . The fit curve is shown as the black solid line in Fig. 8 and shows that the theory matches the experimentally observed behavior very well. In particular, we can clearly confirm that the observed reduction of losses can be attributed to the Pauli suppression effect.

Figure 8: (Color online) Atom-dimer loss-rate coefficient as a function of . The experimental data (blue circles and red squares obtained with LiK and LiK dimers, respectively) are identical to the ones displayed in Fig. 6, with the unphysical negative value excluded. The black solid line corresponds to a fit of our theoretical model to the data, yielding .

The value for obtained from our fit analysis corresponds to about half of the value suggested by the quantum Langevin model amounting to . Similar deviations have previously been observed in other experiments, in particular those involving light atoms Wang et al. (2013).

For collisions between dimers, the situation is more involved because of the three different channels – Li-cc molecule, K-cc molecule, and cc molecule-cc molecule – with the corresponding three free parameters , , and , see Eq. (4). According to our model, the dominant loss contribution is expected from the four-body channel. In order to extract the corresponding bare rate coefficient , we perform a one-parameter fit after fixing to the measured value discussed before and fixing to the value calculated within the quantum Langevin model Not (d). We finally obtain , which we find to be very close the quantum-Langevin value, . The resulting total decay rate is shown as the black solid line in Fig. 9. Our theoretical approach reproduces the observed suppression of collisional relaxation as we approach the Feshbach resonance for .

Figure 9: (Color online) Total dimer-dimer loss-rate coefficient as a function of . The experimental data (blue circles and red squares obtained with LiK and LiK dimers, respectively) are the same as those displayed in Fig. 5. The solid line corresponds to a fit of our theoretical prediction for to the data, with being the only free parameter (see text). The dotted line corresponds to our prediction from an extended, finite-temperature theory Petrov and Levinsen ().

Closer to the Feshbach resonance (), we see clear deviations. We ascribe this discrepancy to temperature effects, which become more prominent when is comparable to or larger than the dimer binding energy Levinsen and Petrov (2011). In this case, the identical fermions may more easily approach each other, thereby reducing the Pauli suppression factor. A theoretical prediction obtained from a finite-temperature calculation for nK Petrov and Levinsen () is shown as the black dotted line. Including finite temperature into our theoretical approach improves the match of theory and experiment near the resonance. From our finite-temperature calculations, we also find that corresponding effects on the collisions of Li atoms with LiK dimers, as discussed before, remain much smaller Petrov and Levinsen ().

The good agreement between our theoretical approach and our experimentally obtained values for the loss coefficients validates the assumptions of our theoretical approach to collisional losses developed in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011). Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the bare rate coefficients can be well estimated by the value obtained from the quantum Langevin model. The agreement with our measurements therefore suggests a predictive power of our theory applied to other Fermi-Fermi systems.

V Other potential Fermi-Fermi systems

Fermi-Fermi systems that feature mass imbalance, collisional stability and tunable interactions may be created with mixtures other than Li-K. To date, Fermi degeneracy has been demonstrated for isotopes of eight chemical elements, He McNamara et al. (2006), Li Truscott et al. (2001); Schreck et al. (2001), K DeMarco and Jin (1999), Cr Naylor et al. (2015), Sr DeSalvo et al. (2010); Tey et al. (2010), Dy Lu et al. (2012), Er Aikawa et al. (2014), and Yb Fukuhara et al. (2007), providing a wealth of possible combinations. We focus our attention to mixtures of Dy and K (mass ratio 4.0) and Cr and Li (8.8), and we discuss the corresponding suppression functions for collisional losses. Larger mass ratios (comparable or larger than 13.6) require an analysis beyond the scope of our present work. In this case, the Efimov Efimov (1973) and other few-body effects Kartavtsev and Malykh (2007); Castin et al. (2010); Blume (2012) can lead to the appearance of new loss-rate features Marcelis et al. (2008).

Figure 10: (Color online) (a) Suppression functions for losses in (a,b,c) atom-dimer and (d,e,f) dimer-dimer collisions. We consider these for equal masses, Dy-K mixtures with a mass ratio of 4.0, and mixtures of Cr and Li where the mass ratio is 8.8.

The suppression functions for losses in atom-dimer collisions are shown in the upper panels of Fig. 10 for (a) the mass-balanced system, (b) the Dy-K mixture, and (c) the Cr-Li mixture. We observe that mixtures of heavy-species atoms and dimers (red dotted lines) show a much stronger suppression compared to the mass-balanced case (blue dashed line in Fig. 10(a)), which strengthens with increasing mass imbalance. For the case of the Dy-K (Cr-Li) mixture, this increase amounts to almost one (two) orders of magnitude at corresponding to about 1. On the contrary, the mixtures composed of light-species atoms and dimers (blue dashed lines in Fig. 10(b) and (c)) show only a weak enhancement of losses as compared to the mass-balanced case, amounting to a factor of about for both the Dy-K and the Cr-Li mixture at .

The suppression functions for losses in collisions between dimers are shown in Fig. 10 (d), (e), and (f) for the equal-mass system, and the systems with a mass imbalance of 4 and 8.8, respectively. All three contributions, from the light atom-dimer, from the heavy atom-dimer, and from the dimer-dimer part, shown in Figs. 10(e) and (f) as the blue dashed, red dotted, and black solid lines, respectively, are significantly smaller than their equal-mass counterparts (blue dashed and black solid lines in Fig. 10(d)).

In view of future experiments on strongly interacting Fermi-Fermi systems, we can now provide estimates for the minimum strength of a suitable Feshbach resonance. The conditions of the successful experiments with spin mixtures of K or Li suggest a minimum required suppression of losses by two orders of magnitudes for all possible channels. According to our theoretical results (Figs. 7 and 10), this would correspond to a condition of for all mass-imbalanced mixtures considered. For the relevant scattering length we may take as a typical value for dimers entering the strongly interacting Fermi gas regime. We thus obtain the approximate condition for a Feshbach resonance to provide sufficient collisional stability.

Vi Summary and Conclusion

In a joint experimental and theoretical effort, we have investigated the stability of weakly bound dimers formed near narrow interspecies Feshbach resonances in Fermi-Fermi mixtures. In our laboratory system – the mixture of Li and K atoms – we have characterized the dependence of three different decay processes on the magnetic detuning from the Feshbach-resonance center. In dilute samples, spontaneous dissociation (one-body process) is observed for dimers composed of atoms that are not in the lowest spin channel, and the measured lifetimes are found to be in a full agreement with a previous theoretical prediction. In dense samples, we have measured the rate coefficients for inelastic dimer-dimer collisions as well as collisions of the lighter atomic species with the dimers. For all decay processes, we find a significant suppression when the resonance center is approached.

Our theoretical framework for the description of collisional losses near narrow Feshbach resonances is based on a model that has been developed in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011). The basic idea is a separation of the problem into a long-range description of the three- and four-body kinematics and a simple relaxation model at short range. The reduction of collisional decay near the resonance center is described by corresponding suppression functions. In extension of previous work Levinsen and Petrov (2011), we have calculated the suppression functions for all relevant loss channels in atom-dimer and dimer-dimer collisions. The comparison of theoretical and experimental results for the mixture of Li and K shows excellent agreement, thus validating the assumptions of our theoretical model.

The observed collisional suppression does not exceed a factor of about five, and thus stays far below what has been observed in homonuclear systems near broad resonances. Nevertheless, our present work shows that the Li-K system, in spite of the narrow nature of interspecies resonances Wille et al. (2008); Naik et al. (2011); Tiecke et al. (2010), can potentially exhibit a strong Pauli suppression of collisional losses, provided the density and resonance detunings can be substantially reduced. Under such conditions, spontaneous dissociation can be expected to become the dominant loss mechanism, with a strong effect on the system. This loss process could be avoided by choosing resonances in the lowest spin channel, which are all very narrow. The level of control required to manipulate the Li-K mixture at very low densities near the narrow resonances is very challenging, going far beyond typical conditions of the present Fermi gas experiments.

Other Fermi-Fermi mixtures are very promising for new experiments in the near future, and we have discussed the Dy-K case (mass ratio 4.0) and the Cr-Li (8.8) case as two illustrative examples. Efforts to realize these systems are under way in different laboratories, and their yet unknown interaction properties need to be explored. The suppression functions that we have calculated for the corresponding mass ratios provide a guide for identifying suitable Feshbach resonances in future experimental work. In general, our results suggest that broad Feshbach resonances are not necessarily required to obtain sufficient collisional stability. Instead, moderately narrow resonances are also promising for realizing new experimental model systems and for exploring the multifaceted many-body physics of fermionic mixtures Liu and Wilczek (2003); Caldas et al. (2005); Iskin and Sá de Melo (2006); Lin et al. (2006); Parish et al. (2007); Iskin and Williams (2008); Baranov et al. (2008); Bausmerth et al. (2009); Gezerlis et al. (2009); Baarsma et al. (2010); Braun et al. (2014, 2015).

Acknowledgements.
We thank J. Walraven and M. Zaccanti for stimulating discussions. The experimental team from Innsbruck acknowledges support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF within the Spezialforschungsbereich (SFB) FoQuS, project part P04 (F4004-N23). The research leading to the theoretical results received funding from the European Research Council (FR7/2007-2013 Grant Agreement No. 341197). D.S.P. thanks IFRAF for support.

*

Appendix A Theoretical approach to collisional decay

Here, we present our calculation of the probability to find an atom close to a closed-channel molecule in dimer-dimer collisions. As discussed in the main text, this probability allows us to extract the contribution from the corresponding relaxation channel to the dimer-dimer relaxation rate constant . This extends our previous calculation of the cc molecule–cc molecule relaxation channel, as presented in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011). Throughout this appendix we set and work in a unit volume.

We now briefly recapitulate the theoretical description of our system. We consider two species of fermions labeled by and employ the two-channel Hamiltonian Timmermans et al. (1999)

(6)

Here, creates (annihilates) a spin atom of mass with momentum and single-particle energy . Likewise, and are the creation and annihilation operators of the cc molecule with mass , kinetic energy , and detuning from the scattering threshold. The interaction between the atoms is mediated by the cc molecule as described by the last term of the Hamiltonian, where the strength of the interconversion term is taken to be constant up to a momentum cutoff . The bare parameters of the model are related to the physical scales, the scattering length and length parameter , through (see, e.g., Gurarie and Radzihovsky (2007))

(7)

with the reduced mass. The propagator of the atoms takes the form

(8)

where the notation specifies that the pole of is shifted slightly into the lower half of the complex plane. The propagator of dimers is obtained by dressing the cc molecule propagator by pairs of free atoms, resulting in

(9)

At zero momentum, this has a pole at the dimer binding energy .

Figure 11: Diagrams contributing to the atom-cc molecule loss process in dimer-dimer collisions. The loss vertex (10) is depicted as a black square. Straight lines are atom propagators, while the dimer propagators are illustrated with wavy lines. All filled boxes represent sums of diagrams. (a) The two-dimer irreducible diagrams denoted contributing to can be obtained from the vertex (see text). (b) All diagrams in can be obtained from the two-dimer irreducible diagrams by the use of the full dimer-dimer T matrix (see text). In both subfigures, the external dimer lines are for illustration only.

To extract the relaxation rate for the three-atom process in a dimer-dimer collision, we introduce a weak short-range interaction potential between the atom and the bare molecule in the Hamiltonian (see Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011)):

(10)

The coefficient is related to the relaxation coupling constant through . The probability to find the atom close to the cc molecule in dimer-dimer scattering at zero collisional energy is then

(11)

where is the change in the -wave dimer-dimer scattering T matrix to linear order in . The change in the dimer-dimer scattering length to the same order is in turn . We calculate this change diagrammatically as illustrated in Fig. 11: First, we consider all diagrams contributing to which are two-dimer irreducible (i.e. do not have two dimers propagating simultaneously). We then include all two-dimer reducible processes by replacing the incoming and/or outgoing dimers by the full dimer-dimer T matrix.

Consider first the sum of diagrams in Fig. 11(a) constituting all two-dimer irreducible contributions to . Taking the incoming [outgoing] dimers to have four-momenta [], we denote this sum by . This does not depend on the angle between and as we take the -wave projection. Integrating over frequencies in the closed loops of the diagrams in Fig. 11(a) yields for the two-dimer irreducible contribution to :

(12)

where we integrate over the angles of and . is the dimer residue at the energy pole. The function is the sum of all diagrams with two incoming dimers at four-momenta , an outgoing [] atom with , and an outgoing dimer with . The sum is averaged over the angle of . satisfies an integral equation derived in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011); for the expression we refer the reader to Eq. (29) of that paper.

Finally, we relate to the two-dimer irreducible diagrams by allowing for any number of dimer-dimer scattering events on the left and/or right side of , see Fig. 11(b). The relation is

(13)

where with the dimer-dimer T matrix in the absence of the perturbation (10). To avoid poles and branch cuts, the and integration contours are rotated to the imaginary axis. The dimer-dimer T matrix satisfies an integral equation derived in Ref. Levinsen and Petrov (2011), see Eq. (28) of that paper.

References

  • Köhler et al. (2006) T. Köhler, K. Goral, and P. S. Julienne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1131 (2006).
  • Ferlaino et al. (2009) F. Ferlaino, S. Knoop, and R. Grimm, in Cold Molecules: Theory, Experiment, Applications, edited by R. V. Krems, B. Friedrich, and W. C. Stwalley (CRC Press, 2009), arXiv:0809.3920.
  • Chin et al. (2010) C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. S. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  • Jochim et al. (2003a) S. Jochim, M. Bartenstein, A. Altmeyer, G. Hendl, S. Riedl, C. Chin, J. Hecker Denschlag, and R. Grimm, Science 302, 2101 (2003a).
  • Greiner et al. (2003) M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, and D. S. Jin, Nature (London) 426, 537 (2003).
  • Zwierlein et al. (2003) M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, S. M. F. Raupach, S. Gupta, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 250401 (2003).
  • Regal et al. (2004a) C. A. Regal, M. Greiner, and D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040403 (2004a).
  • Zwierlein et al. (2004) M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, S. M. F. Raupach, A. J. Kerman, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 120403 (2004).
  • Thalhammer et al. (2006) G. Thalhammer, K. Winkler, F. Lang, S. Schmid, R. Grimm, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050402 (2006).
  • Winkler et al. (2006) K. Winkler, G. Thalhammer, F. Lang, R. Grimm, J. Hecker Denschlag, A. J. Daley, A. Kantian, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 441, 853 (2006).
  • Meinert et al. (2013) F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, E. Kirilov, K. Lauber, P. Weinmann, A. J. Daley, and H.-C. Nägerl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053003 (2013).
  • Lang et al. (2008a) F. Lang, P. van der Straten, B. Brandstätter, G. Thalhammer, K. Winkler, P. S. Julienne, R. Grimm, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Nat. Phys. 4, 223 (2008a).
  • Lang et al. (2008b) F. Lang, K. Winkler, C. Strauss, R. Grimm, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 133005 (2008b).
  • Ni et al. (2008) K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Science 322, 231 (2008).
  • Danzl et al. (2010) J. G. Danzl, M. J. Mark, E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, R. Hart, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, and H.-C. Nägerl, Nat. Phys. 6, 265 (2010).
  • Takekoshi et al. (2014) T. Takekoshi, L. Reichsöllner, A. Schindewolf, J. M. Hutson, C. R. Le Sueur, O. Dulieu, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, and H.-C. Nägerl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 205301 (2014).
  • Molony et al. (2014) P. K. Molony, P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. Köppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 255301 (2014).
  • Park et al. (2015) J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 205302 (2015).
  • Guo et al. (2016) M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Quéméner, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205303 (2016).
  • Petrov et al. (2004) D. S. Petrov, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 090404 (2004).
  • Petrov et al. (2005a) D. S. Petrov, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. A 71, 012708 (2005a).
  • Petrov et al. (2005b) D. S. Petrov, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, J. Phys. B 38, S645 (2005b).
  • Cubizolles et al. (2003) J. Cubizolles, T. Bourdel, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240401 (2003).
  • Jochim et al. (2003b) S. Jochim, M. Bartenstein, A. Altmeyer, G. Hendl, C. Chin, J. Hecker Denschlag, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett 91, 240402 (2003b).
  • Regal et al. (2004b) C. A. Regal, M. Greiner, and D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 083201 (2004b).
  • Giorgini et al. (2008) S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008).
  • Zwerger (2011) W. Zwerger, The BCS-BEC crossover and the unitary Fermi gas, vol. 836 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).
  • Marcelis et al. (2008) B. Marcelis, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032707 (2008).
  • Levinsen and Petrov (2011) J. Levinsen and D. Petrov, Eur. Phys. J. D 65, 67 (2011).
  • Taglieber et al. (2008) M. Taglieber, A.-C. Voigt, T. Aoki, T. W. Hänsch, and K. Dieckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 010401 (2008).
  • Wille et al. (2008) E. Wille, F. M. Spiegelhalder, G. Kerner, D. Naik, A. Trenkwalder, G. Hendl, F. Schreck, R. Grimm, T. G. Tiecke, J. T. M. Walraven, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 053201 (2008).
  • Tiecke et al. (2010) T. G. Tiecke, M. R. Goosen, A. Ludewig, S. D. Gensemer, S. Kraft, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 053202 (2010).
  • Naik et al. (2011) D. Naik, A. Trenkwalder, C. Kohstall, F. M. Spiegelhalder, M. Zaccanti, G. Hendl, F. Schreck, R. Grimm, T. Hanna, and P. Julienne, Eur. Phys. J. D 65, 55 (2011).
  • Trenkwalder et al. (2011) A. Trenkwalder, C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, D. Naik, A. I. Sidorov, F. Schreck, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 115304 (2011).
  • Voigt et al. (2009) A.-C. Voigt, M. Taglieber, L. Costa, T. Aoki, W. Wieser, T. W. Hänsch, and K. Dieckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020405 (2009), ibid. 105, 269904(E) (2010).
  • Kohstall et al. (2012) C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, M. Jag, A. Trenkwalder, P. Massignan, G. M. Bruun, F. Schreck, and R. Grimm, Nature (London) 485, 615 (2012).
  • Jag et al. (2014) M. Jag, M. Zaccanti, M. Cetina, R. S. Lous, F. Schreck, R. Grimm, D. S. Petrov, and J. Levinsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 075302 (2014).
  • Cetina et al. (2015) M. Cetina, M. Jag, R. S. Lous, J. T. M. Walraven, R. Grimm, R. S. Christensen, and G. M. Bruun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 135302 (2015).
  • Cetina et al. (2016) M. Cetina, M. Jag, R. S. Lous, I. Fritsche, J. T. M. Walraven, R. Grimm, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, R. Schmidt, M. Knap, et al., arXiv:1604.07423 (2016).
  • Petrov (2004) D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 143201 (2004).
  • (41) M. Jag, M. Cetina, R. S. Lous, and R. Grimm, (unpublished). We determined by measuring the energy shift of K atoms in a Li cloud and comparing it to the predictions of a dressed quasiparticle model Massignan (2012).
  • Spiegelhalder et al. (2010) F. M. Spiegelhalder, A. Trenkwalder, D. Naik, G. Kerner, E. Wille, G. Hendl, F. Schreck, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. A 81, 043637 (2010).
  • Köhler et al. (2005) T. Köhler, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 020402 (2005).
  • Thompson et al. (2005) S. T. Thompson, E. Hodby, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 020401 (2005).
  • Not (a) There is a differential light shift between the closed-channel molecule and a Li-K pair state induced by the 1064-nm trapping light Jag et al. (2014); Cetina et al. (2015, 2016). For our experimental conditions, this gives rise to an upward correction of the stated dimer trapping frequency by , dependent on the magnetic detuning from the FR. In our analysis, this small correction is taken into account.
  • Weber et al. (2003) T. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H.-C. Nägerl, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 123201 (2003).
  • Staanum et al. (2006) P. Staanum, S. D. Kraft, J. Lange, R. Wester, and M. Weidemüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 023201 (2006).
  • Zahzam et al. (2006) N. Zahzam, T. Vogt, M. Mudrich, D. Comparat, and P. Pillet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 023202 (2006).
  • Gao (2010) B. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263203 (2010).
  • Julienne et al. (2011) P. S. Julienne, T. M. Hanna, and Z. Idziaszek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19114 (2011).
  • Quéméner et al. (2011) G. Quéméner, J. Bohn, A. Petrov, and S. Kotochigova, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062703 (2011).
  • Not (b) The data point at mG clearly lies beyond the trend of the other data. Thoroughly re-checking the settings of our experimental setup for this measurement yielded no hint for what could have caused the discrepancy.
  • Costa et al. (2010) L. Costa, J. Brachmann, A.-C. Voigt, C. Hahn, M. Taglieber, T. W. Hänsch, and K. Dieckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 123201 (2010).
  • Not (c) In dimer-dimer collisions, three atoms can approach each other in different angular momentum channels. In the narrow resonance case, the -wave contribution to for small scales as and should be multiplied by a quantity of order . The factor comes from the centrifugal barrier which the cc molecule and atom experience at distances . In our case this factor gives a four order of magnitude suppression and we neglect this relaxation channel. However, in the wide-resonant case this channel is dominant since  Petrov et al. (2004, 2005a, 2005b).
  • von Stecher et al. (2008) J. von Stecher, C. H. Greene, and D. Blume, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043619 (2008).
  • Wang et al. (2013) T. T. Wang, M.-S. Heo, T. M. Rvachov, D. A. Cotta, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 173203 (2013).
  • Not (d) Treating also as a free parameter leads to an unphysically large value for . We attribute this to strong correlations between the fit parameters and residual finite-temperature effects. For the fit we discard the three data points below to make it less sensitive to the finite-temperature effects. We also discard the outlier point at . By trying out different fit strategies we find that the final value obtained for is robust, with variations staying well below .
  • (58) D. S. Petrov and J. Levinsen, (unpublished).
  • McNamara et al. (2006) J. M. McNamara, T. Jeltes, A. S. Tychkov, W. Hogervorst, and W. Vassen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 080404 (2006).
  • Truscott et al. (2001) A. G. Truscott, K. E. Strecker, W. I. McAlexander, G. B. Partridge, and R. G. Hulet, Science 291, 2570 (2001).
  • Schreck et al. (2001) F. Schreck, L. Khaykovich, K. L. Corwin, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cubizolles, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 080403 (2001).
  • DeMarco and Jin (1999) B. DeMarco and D. S. Jin, Science 285, 1703 (1999).
  • Naylor et al. (2015) B. Naylor, A. Reigue, E. Maréchal, O. Gorceix, B. Laburthe-Tolra, and L. Vernac, Phys. Rev. A 91, 011603 (2015).
  • DeSalvo et al. (2010) B. J. DeSalvo, M. Yan, P. G. Mickelson, Y. N. Martinez de Escobar, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 030402 (2010).
  • Tey et al. (2010) M. K. Tey, S. Stellmer, R. Grimm, and F. Schreck, Phys. Rev. A 82, 011608 (2010).
  • Lu et al. (2012) M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 215301 (2012).
  • Aikawa et al. (2014) K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 010404 (2014).
  • Fukuhara et al. (2007) T. Fukuhara, Y. Takasu, M. Kumakura, and Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030401 (2007).
  • Efimov (1973) V. Efimov, Nucl. Phys. A 210, 157 (1973).
  • Kartavtsev and Malykh (2007) O. I. Kartavtsev and A. V. Malykh, J. Phys. B 40, 1429 (2007).
  • Castin et al. (2010) Y. Castin, C. Mora, and L. Pricoupenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 223201 (2010).
  • Blume (2012) D. Blume, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230404 (2012).
  • Liu and Wilczek (2003) W. V. Liu and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047002 (2003).
  • Caldas et al. (2005) H. Caldas, C. W. Morais, and A. L. Mota, Phys. Rev. D 72, 045008 (2005).
  • Iskin and Sá de Melo (2006) M. Iskin and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 100404 (2006).
  • Lin et al. (2006) G.-D. Lin, W. Yi, and L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. A 74, 031604 (2006).
  • Parish et al. (2007) M. M. Parish, F. M. Marchetti, A. Lamacraft, and B. D. Simons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160402 (2007).
  • Iskin and Williams (2008) M. Iskin and C. J. Williams, Phys. Rev. A 77, 013605 (2008).
  • Baranov et al. (2008) M. A. Baranov, C. Lobo, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. A 78, 033620 (2008).
  • Bausmerth et al. (2009) I. Bausmerth, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. A 79, 043622 (2009).
  • Gezerlis et al. (2009) A. Gezerlis, S. Gandolfi, K. E. Schmidt, and J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 060403 (2009).
  • Baarsma et al. (2010) J. E. Baarsma, K. B. Gubbels, and H. T. C. Stoof, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013624 (2010).
  • Braun et al. (2014) J. Braun, J. E. Drut, T. Jahn, M. Pospiech, and D. Roscher, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053613 (2014).
  • Braun et al. (2015) J. Braun, J. E. Drut, and D. Roscher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 050404 (2015).
  • Timmermans et al. (1999) E. Timmermans, P. Tommasini, M. Hussein, and A. Kerman, Phys. Rep. 315, 199 (1999).
  • Gurarie and Radzihovsky (2007) V. Gurarie and L. Radzihovsky, Ann. Phys. (NY) 322, 2 (2007).
  • Massignan (2012) P. Massignan, Europhys. Lett. 98, 10012 (2012).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
105094
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description