Launching jets from accretion belts

Launching jets from accretion belts

Ron Schreier and Noam Soker11affiliation: Department of Physics, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000 Israel; ronsr@physics.technion.ac.il, soker@physics.technion.ac.il.
Abstract

We propose that sub-Keplerian accretion belts around stars might launch jets. The sub-Keplerian inflow does not form a rotationally supported accretion disk, but it rather reaches the accreting object from a wide solid angle. The basic ingredients of the flow are a turbulent region where the accretion belt interacts with the accreting object via a shear layer, and two avoidance regions on the poles where the accretion rate is very low. A dynamo that is developed in the shear layer amplifies magnetic fields to high values. It is likely that the amplified magnetic fields form polar outflows from the avoidance regions. Our speculative belt-launched jets model has implications to a rich variety of astrophysical objects, from the removal of common envelopes to the explosion of core collapse supernovae by jittering jets.

stars: jets — (stars:) binaries: accretion discs — (stars:) supernovae: general — accretion, accretion disks

1 Introduction

Jets are known to be launched by accretion disks around compact objects (e.g., Livio 2011), such as super-massive black holes in active galactic nuclei, X-ray binaries, young stellar objects (YSOs), and in planetary nebulae (PNe; e.g., Sahai & Nyman 2000). In many of these objects the jets are observed and resolved. We here proposed a mechanism to launch jets by objects that are embedded inside optically thick gas, and in most cases cannot be observed. In such cases the gas originates from regions close to the compact object, and in some cases does not have large enough specific angular momentum to form an accretion disk. Instead, the accreted gas forms a sub-Keplerian inflow with density increasing toward the equator of the compact object. We term this flow an accretion belt. We are particularly motivated to shed light on the possibility that jets are launched by accretion belts around main sequence (MS) stars that preform a spiraling-in motion inside the large envelope of a giant star; i.e., a common envelope evolution (CEE). In such a situation the mechanism of jet launching should not involve an extended accretion disk. As such, we also relax the assumption that large scale magnetic fields exist in the accreted gas.

Many jet launching models are based on the operation of large scale magnetic fields, i.e., those with coherence scale larger than the radius of the disk at the considered location (e.g., Zanni & Ferreira 2013 and Narayan et al. 2014 and references therein). Some models do not rely on the magnetic fields of the accreting compact object, but rather assume an outflow from an extended disk region with large-scale magnetic fields (e.g., Konigl & Pudritz 2000; Shu et al. 2000; Ferreira 2002; Krasnopolsky et al. 2003; Ferreira & Casse 2004; Murphy et al. 2010; Sheikhnezami et al. 2012; Tzeferacos et al. 2013; Sheikhnezami & Fendt 2015).

We note the following properties that support our approach of not basing our mechanism on large scale magnetic fields. Firstly, the strong dynamo that operates in accretion disks is likely to modify the structure of the large scale magnetic fields, (e.g. Hujeirat et al. 2003). Secondly, Ferreira (2013) concluded that steady state jets’ launching models cannot spin down protostars to the observed values of roughly of their break-up speed. In contrast, unsteady models are better candidates for the removal of energy and angular momentum from the disk. Our proposed mechanism for jet launching in sub-Keplerian accretion flows is based on unsteady behavior of the magnetic fields. Our proposed mechanism incorporates reconnection of magnetic field lines that takes place in many sporadic events in the accretion belt, much as magnetic activity occurs on the solar surface. These events, we propose in the study, eject mass along the polar directions and lead to the formation of jets.

We aim at two cases in particular: (1) The case where a MS star is spiraling-in inside the envelope of a giant star. The MS star can accrete mass from the envelope at a rate of the order of the Eddington limit. The specific angular momentum of the accreted gas, , might be in many cases below that required to form a Keplerian accretion disk around the MS star, , but still be non-negligible (Soker, 2004). (2) An accretion by the newly born NS in core collapse supernovae (CCSNe). In some CCSNe the accreted gas might possess a rapidly varying non-negligible value of the specific angular momentum, but not sufficient to form a Keplerian accretion disk (Gilkis & Soker, 2015, 2016; Papish et al., 2016). Both scenarios are most difficult for observational validation.

Incorporating ingredients from accretion disks formed at high accretion rates we build the belt-launched jets model. The basic ingredients of the model are described in section 2, and the dynamo is discussed in section 3. The implications for some specific astrophysical objects are discussed in section 4 that also contains our summery.

2 Basic Ingredients

A geometrically-thin Keplerian accretion disk is connected to the accreting body, if it is not a black hole and if the accreting body magnetic field is not too strong, via a thin high-shear layer termed the boundary layer (e.g., Regev 1983; Regev & Bertout 1995). The matter in the boundary layer expands to higher latitudes along the surface of the accreting body. Inogamov & Sunyaev (1999) built a model for cases of high accretion rates onto neutron stars (NS), and proposed that the meridional spreading brings the accreted mass close to the poles. In that model the luminosity from the spreading-layer, or belt, reaches a maximum away from the equatorial plane. The accreted gas spins-down to the rotation velocity of the accreting body through a turbulent friction that exists in the spreading-layer (Inogamov & Sunyaev, 1999, 2010). This type of flow is depicted in the right side of Fig. 1. The left half-side of Fig. 1 schematically presents the flow structure proposed in the present study.

Figure 1: The flow structure studied here is presented schematically in the left half of the figure. It has some similarities with the spreading-layer that was proposed by (Inogamov & Sunyaev, 1999) that is presented on the right half. The meridional extent of the hot part of the spreading layer is given by equation (1). The angle of avoidance region is given by equation (2).

Two comments are in place here with regards to Fig. 1. () In this study we consider cases where a Keplerian disk does not form, at least not initially. It is true that when the thermal and/or magnetic pressures are considered the angular velocity of the gas in the disk is slightly sub-Keplerian. For example, simulations for jets-launching disks have slightly sub-Keplerian disks (e.g., Casse & Keppens 2002; Zanni et al. 2007). However, we consider cases where the magnetic and thermal pressure are not sufficient to allow an accretion disk at early times. Later, after the initial magnetic field has been amplified and viscosity transferred angular momentum outward, an accretion disk might be formed. If an accretion disk does form, then the launching of jets becomes even more likely. We here take the pessimistic case that an accretion disk does not form. () Because of the sub-Keplerian angular momentum, away from the accreting star the flow is not influenced much by the rotation. For example, for a MS star orbiting inside a giant star the accretion might be that of Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion. For a NS accreting from a collapsing core, the flow can be spherical on large scale. However, when the angular velocity is sub-Keplerian but non-negligible, very close to the surface of the star the gas is concentrated toward the equatorial plane. In the polar regions the density of the inflowing gas is very low.

It is not possible to directly apply the results of Inogamov & Sunyaev (1999) to the cases we study here (listed in section 1). We study MS stars accreting at very high rates, a process that is different than accretion onto a NS. For example, radiation pressure might not be as important as in accretion onto a NS. In the flow structure onto a newly born NS in CCSNe, cooling is mainly via neutrinos, and not by photon emission. The flow structures we discuss here are more complicated, and 3D numerical studies will be required to simulate such flows. The study of Inogamov & Sunyaev (1999) non the less suggests that an energetic wide accretion belt can be formed on the surface of the accreting body, and that turbulence is expected in such a belt.

Neglecting magnetic fields, Inogamov & Sunyaev (1999) find that the meridional extent of the hot part of the spreading layer (the belt) , is approximately given by

(1)

where is the Eddington luminosity limit, is the accretion rate, and is the Keplerian velocity on the surface of the accreting body. One can find that for accreting rates larger than about onto a NS with a mass of and a radius of , the spreading layer extends to the polar regions. We here also apply equation (1) to accretion onto a MS star. We find that for the spreading layer to reach the polar region of an accreting solar-like star, the accretion rate should be larger than approximately . Such accretion rates can be achieved during the common envelope evolution.

We note that equation (1) was developed for a belt formed by an accretion disk. We here investigate cases where no geometrically-thin accretion disk is formed, but rather the accreted gas streams from a wide angle, with an avoidance region near the poles. As well, equation (1) does not take into account magnetic activity. The magnetic activity leads to mass ejection from the polar regions, and maintain that region open to an outflow (see below).

In the sub-Keplerian inflow scenario the accreted gas has an average specific angular momentum of , where is the Keplerian specific angular momentum on the surface of the accreting object of mass and radius . A parcel of gas with such an angular momentum cannot be accreted to the surface of the star within an angle of from the poles, given by (Papish et al., 2016)

(2)

This is termed the avoidance angle.

In section 3 we speculate that the extended belt formed in the sub-Keplerian accretion flow can launch jets. We suggest there that the strong radial shear due to the powerful differential rotation together with the turbulence, amplify magnetic fields through the dynamo action. MHD effects, such as reconnection of magnetic field lines and dragging gas in the polar directions via magnetic stress of filed lines that are anchored to the accreted gas, then launch a polar-collimated outflow. The point to make here is that in the case of a belt formed by an accretion disk it is expected that more mass will be launched by the accretion disk than by the belt. In the sub-Keplerian wide inflow case, most, or even all, of the outflowing gas is launched by the belt.

The amplification of magnetic fields affects the opening angle as given in equation (2). () Reconnection of the magnetic field lines eject gas through the two opposite polar avoidance regions. This activity, that leads to the formation of an outflow and high magnetic pressure region, might increase the opening angle in the inflowing gas. () Winding of the magnetic field lines frozen to the polar outflow channels rotation energy to outflow kinetic energy. The magnetic tension of the magnetic field lines might further increase the opening angle. Over all, the opening angle increases with the specific angular momentum of the accreted gas, and might be further increased by magnetic activity.

The basic ingredients of the belt-launched jets scenario are presented in Table 1 alongside with those of jets launched by accretion disks. Our proposed launching mechanism does not require large scale magnetic fields and does not require a thin Keplerian disk. The most important ingredient is the operation of a dynamo, the belt dynamo.

Physical parameter Accretion disk Belt
Accretion rate () up to
Accreted specific angular
momentum ()
Angular velocity
at launching ()
Launching area ()
Magnetic fields weak to strong is amplified
locally via dynamo
Jet’s energy Gravitational of Gravitational of
source accreted gas accreted gas

The different symbols have the following meaning: is the radius of the accreting body; is the Eddington accretion limit; and are the Keplerian specific angular momentum and angular velocity very close to the accreting body surface, respectively.

Table 1: Jet launching cases

3 The Belt Dynamo

There are several approaches to estimate the amplification of magnetic fields in sheared layers in stellar interiors, both in convective and non-convective regions. In the present preliminary study we take one calculation referring a non-convective region. We then argue that in a convective regions of the accretion belt the amplification will be more efficient even.

Spruit (2002) gave the analytic ground for quantifying the magnetic fields created in non-convective layers in a differentially rotating star. The differential rotation stretches poloidal field lines into toroidal fields. Magnetic instabilities in the amplified toroidal magnetic fields replace the role of convection in creating more poloidal magnetic field from the toroidal field. This process, that is relatively slow in stellar interior, is expected to be more efficient in the more rapidly spinning belt. The turbulent regions of the belt are even more efficient in amplifying the magnetic field. We turn to show that even in the non-turbulent regions of the belt the dynamo can be effective.

Due to the strong differential rotation (shear) occurring in the belt the radial component of the field, , is twisted into the azimuthal direction, , so that after few rotations it becomes the dominant component. Its strength increases linearly with time, until it becomes unstable. The amplitude of the dynamo-generated field in the non-turbulent regions is given by (Spruit, 2002)

(3)
(4)

where the density in the belt is estimated from mass conservation of the inflowing gas

(5)

and is the radial inflow speed into the belt, which we take as the free-fall velocity. The temperature of the accreted plasma when it is stopped on the accreting object is calculated from . Here is the belt angular velocity, and is the buoyancy (Brunt-Vaisala) frequency that is slightly less than the Keplerian frequency. We can crudely take . The thermal diffusivity is , where is the heat capacity per unit mass, is the opacity, and is the dimensionless differential rotation rate.

As the cooling in accreting NS in CCSNe is due to neutrinos, we apply (3) and (4) to accreting MS stars. We take an accretion rate of onto a solar like star, from which we find the density of the accretion inflow near the surface, and the temperature of the gas in the belt to be . We find that , and so . We can derive from (3) the ratio of the magnetic field energy density to that of the kinetic and thermal gas density, for an accreting MS star at a rate of . For the gas energy density we take , where is the escape velocity from the star

(6)

As stated, this is for the non-turbulence part of the accretion belt. As turbulence is expected in the strongly sheared belt, the amplification can be more efficient event. We conclude that a fraction of of the accreted energy is channelled to magnetic energy. In our proposed scenario the magnetic field lines are further winded and stretched by the rotating belt as they are dragged by the outflowing gas. The magnetic fields reconnect and launch jets.

In claiming that an efficient dynamo can be operate in the accretion belt we are encouraged by the recent results of Mösta et al. (2015) who conducted very high resolution simulations of CCSNe with pre-collpase rapidly rotating cores. They show that rapidly rotating material around the newly born NS can amplify tremendously an initial magnetic field, and leads to jets lunching. In their simulations the turbulent kinetic energy in the accreted gas is converted into electromagnetic energy. The timescale for an e-fold increase in the magnetic field in the accretion disk, , is about half an orbital period in the relevant part of the disk. Interestingly, only very-high resolution simulations were able to demonstrate the tremendous magnetic field amplification. These results are very supportive for the jittering-jets model for the explosion of all CCSNe with explosion energies of .

Intermittent accretion belts in CCSNe are expected to last for a time of , as estimated either from the fluctuation in the convective shells of the pre-collapse core (Gilkis & Soker, 2016), or from fluctuations in the post-collapse region around the NS formed by the standing accretion shock instability (SASI; Papish et al. 2016). This time scale is about equal to tens of Keplerian orbits at from the NS. A belt with a specific angular momentum of has an orbital period on the equator of the newly born NS of . Closer to the poles the period will be shorter. Over all, the accretion belt can last for a time scale that is several times and up to tens times a half orbital period. According to the results of Mösta et al. (2015) this is a sufficiently long time to amplify the magnetic fields. This shows that the sub-Keplerian disk might have sufficient time to substantially amplify the magnetic fields. We conjecture that the strong magnetic fields with the preferred axis of rotation and the avoidance angle (eq. 2), lead to the launching of two opposite jets in the polar directions, where the ram pressure of the accreted gas is very low.

4 Discussion and Summary

We conducted a preliminary study that led us to argue that sub-Keplerian accretion flows onto compact objects can launch jets. The sub-Keplerian accreted gas forms an accretion belt rather than an accretion disk (left half side of Fig. 1). Within the avoidance angle from the polar directions (eq. 2) the accretion rate is very low. The dynamo amplification of the magnetic fields within the belt (section 3) can lead to very strong magnetic fields, as can be seen from equation (6) that gives the ratio of the amplified magnetic field energy density to that in the accreted gas.

We speculate that reconnection of the magnetic field lines can lead to an outflow through the two opposite polar avoidance regions. Winding of the magnetic field lines frozen to the polar outflow can further channel rotation energy to outflow kinetic energy. The main differences and common properties of the proposed belt-launched jets scenario from those of the common disk-launched jets are presented in Table 1.

Our conclusion is that accretion belts that are formed by sub-Keplerian accretion flows might lunch jets. If true, these results might have far reaching implications for the removal of common envelopes by jets. Numerical studies point at a limited efficiency of the common envelope removal by the gravitational energy released during the spiraling-in process (e.g., De Marco et al. 2011; Passy et al. 2012; Ricker & Taam 2012; Ohlmann et al. 2015). It has been suggested that jets can assist it removing the common envelope (e.g. Soker 2014). However, the specific angular momentum of the gas accreted by a MS star spiraling-in inside a giant envelope is sub-Keplerian (Soker, 2004). A belt is expected to be formed around the MS star during the common envelope phase. Jets that might be launched by the belt, as argued in the present study, can assist in removing the common envelope.

As well, our results might have implications to CCSNe explosion scenarios. The neutrino-delayed mechanism has severe problems in accounting for explosions with kinetic energy of more than about (Papish et al., 2015). An intermittent accretion belt is expected to be formed around the newly born NS during the first several seconds of the explosion (Gilkis & Soker, 2015, 2016; Papish et al., 2015). If the present results hold to that flow structure, then the jets can explode the star, up to explosion energies of above (Gilkis et al., 2016). We note that because of the stochastic nature of the angular momentum of the accreted mass in many CCSNe, in the jittering jets model the spin of the NS might be inclined to the momentarily angular momentum of the belt. The effect of this will have to be studied in future numerical simulations.

In both cases, of common envelope removal and CCSNe, the origin region of the jets is completely obscured. In cases where the origin of jets is seen, such as in young stellar objects, active galactic nuclei, and some binary systems, the accretion rate is low and an accretion disk is required to be formed. We here argued that in cases where accretion rate is very high, hence the entire region is heavily obscured, even accretion belt formed by sub-Keplerian inflow can launch jets (see also Shiber et al. 2016).

We can summarize our study by stating that the possibility for accretion belts to launch collimated outflows, or jets, opens a rich variety of processes that can account for some puzzles in astrophysics, such as the explosion of massive stars and in some cases in the removal of the common envelope.

We thank an anonymous referee for valuable comments. This research was supported by the Asher Fund for Space Research at the Technion, and the E. and J. Bishop Research Fund at the Technion.

References

  • Casse & Keppens (2002) Casse, F., & Keppens, R. 2002, ApJ, 581, 988
  • De Marco et al. (2011) De Marco, O., Passy, J.-C., Moe, M., Herwig, F., Mac Low, M.-M., & Paxton, B. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2277
  • Ferreira (2002) Ferreira, J. 2002, in Star Formation and the Physics of Young Stars, EAS Publications Series, 3, eds. J. Bouvier and J.-P. Zahn (EDP Sciences), 229
  • Ferreira (2013) Ferreira, J. 2013, eds. P. Hennebelle and C. Charbonnel (EAS Publications Series) Vol. 62, 169
  • Ferreira & Casse (2004) Ferreira, J., & Casse, F. 2004, ApJ Lett., 601, L139
  • Gilkis & Soker (2015) Gilkis, A., & Soker, N. 2015, ApJ, 806, 28
  • Gilkis & Soker (2016) Gilkis, A., & Soker, N. 2016, arXiv:1505.05756
  • Gilkis et al. (2016) Gilkis, A., Soker, N., & Papish, O. 2016, arXiv:1511.01471
  • Hujeirat et al. (2003) Hujeirat, A., Livio, M., Camenzind, M., & Burkert, A. 2003, A&A, 408, 415
  • Inogamov & Sunyaev (1999) Inogamov, N.A., & Sunyaev, R.A. 1999, Astron. Lett., 25(5), 269-293
  • Inogamov & Sunyaev (2010) Inogamov, N. A., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2010, Astronomy Letters, 36, 848
  • Konigl & Pudritz (2000) Konigl, A., & Pudritz, R. E. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A.P., Russell, S. S. (University of Arizona Press, Tucson),759
  • Krasnopolsky et al. (2003) Krasnopolsky, R., Li, Z.-Y., & Blandford, R. D. 2003, ApJ, 595, 631
  • Livio (2011) Livio, M. 2011, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 1358, 329
  • Mösta et al. (2015) Mösta, P., Ott, C. D., Radice, D., Roberts, L. F., Schnetter, E., & Haas, R. 2015, Nature, 528, 376
  • Murphy et al. (2010) Murphy, G. C., Ferreira, J., & Zanni, C. 2010, A&A, 512, A82
  • Narayan et al. (2014) Narayan, R., McClintock, J. E., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2014, General Relativity, Cosmology and Astrophysics, Vol. 177 (Springer International Publishing Switzerland), 523
  • Ohlmann et al. (2015) Ohlmann, S. T., Roepke, F. K., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2015, arXiv:1512.04529
  • Papish et al. (2016) Papish, O., Gilkis, A., & Soker, N. 2016, arXiv:1508.00218
  • Papish et al. (2015) Papish, O., Nordhaus, J., & Soker, N. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2362
  • Passy et al. (2012) Passy, J.-C., De Marco, O., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 52
  • Regev (1983) Regev, O. 1983, A&A, 126, 146
  • Regev & Bertout (1995) Regev, O., & Bertout, C. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 71
  • Ricker & Taam (2012) Ricker, P. M., & Taam, R. E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 74
  • Sahai & Nyman (2000) Sahai, R., & Nyman, L.-Å. 2000, ApJ Lett., 538, L145
  • Sheikhnezami & Fendt (2015) Sheikhnezami, S., & Fendt, C. 2015, ApJ, 814, 113
  • Sheikhnezami et al. (2012) Sheikhnezami, S., Fendt, C., Porth, O., Vaidya, B., & Ghanbari, J. 2012, ApJ, 757, 65
  • Shiber et al. (2016) Shiber, S., Schreier, R., & Soker, N. 2016, arXiv:1504.04144
  • Shu et al. (2000) Shu, F. H., Najita, J. R., Shang, H., & Li, Z.-Y. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A.P., Russell, S. S (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), 789
  • Soker (2004) Soker, N. 2004, New A, 9, 399
  • Soker (2014) Soker, N. 2014, arXiv:1404.5234
  • Spruit (2002) Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923
  • Tzeferacos et al. (2013) Tzeferacos, P., Ferrari, A., Mignone, A., Zanni, C., Bodo, G., & Massaglia, S. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3151
  • Zanni & Ferreira (2013) Zanni, C., & Ferreira, J. 2013, A&A, 550, AA99
  • Zanni et al. (2007) Zanni, C., Ferrari, A., Rosner, R., Bodo, G., & Massaglia, S. 2007, A&A, 469, 811
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
270487
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description