Keyword Spotter Model for Crop Pest and Disease Monitoring from Community Radio Data

Keyword Spotter Model for Crop Pest and Disease Monitoring from Community Radio Data

Benjamin Akera
Makerere University
Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende
Makerere University
Jonathan Mukiibi
Makerere University
Ali Hussein
Ronin Institute
Nathan Baleeta
Makerere University
Daniel Ssendiwala
Makerere University
Samiiha Nalwooga
Makerere University

In societies with well developed internet infrastructure, social media is the leading medium of communication for various social issues especially for breaking news situations. In rural Uganda however, public community radio is still a dominant means for news dissemination. Community radio gives audience to the general public especially to individuals living in rural areas, and thus plays an important role in giving a voice to those living in the broadcast area. It is an avenue for participatory communication and a tool relevant in both economic and social development.This is supported by the rise to ubiquity of mobile phones providing access to phone-in or text-in talk shows. In this paper, we describe an approach to analysing the readily available community radio data with machine learning-based speech keyword spotting techniques. We identify the keywords of interest related to agriculture and build models to automatically identify these keywords from audio streams. Our contribution through these techniques is a cost-efficient and effective way to monitor food security concerns particularly in rural areas. Through keyword spotting and radio talk show analysis, issues such as crop diseases, pests, drought and famine can be captured and fed into an early warning system for stakeholders and policy makers.

1 Introduction

Ensuring a functional and near real-time system of surveillance for crop diseases and pests is of critical importance to sustaining the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa (mutembesa2018crowdsourcing, ). Disease and pest surveillance systems have to be put in place to provide early warning to the farmers and the relevant agricultural research bodies. Usually, when a crop disease or pest is reported in a given area, experts from the respective research institutes take time to reach the reported location to carry out investigations. This usually involves inspection of the crops at specific intervals (of about 10 km) along the more accessible main roads, covering only small proportions of the areas of interest in major districts (mutembesa2018crowdsourcing, ). Because the surveillance teams have to work within limited budgets, the surveys and the results from the surveys may be delayed or fewer regions may be sampled in a particular year. As the health experts provide an annual snapshot of the health of crops across the country they are limited in their ability to provide real-time actionable surveillance data. In many cases, the farmers never get to know the disease that has attacked their crops for weeks or even months.

In many areas in Uganda, the vast majority of the affected people will use social media to communicate their concerns in their local communities. This social media is not Facebook or Twitter, its the local community radio stations existing in almost each village in sub-Saharan Africa (saeb2017very, ). These rural radio stations give farmers an opportunity to interact with each other and also with the relevant agricultural authorities such as extension workers and agricultural experts. This can usually be through a number of formats like phone-in programs, live talk shows (nakabugu2001role, ). Specifically for some of the radio stations, they have targeted agricultural talk shows that can host an expert from an agricultural research institute who can aim at providing specific information for example: about crop disease and pest management.

Keyword Spotting systems (KWS) is a classification task that aims at detection and retrieving of a series of words from a database of audio streams. The advantage of using a KWS is that unlike full automatic speech recognition systems, they can be developed without sufficient labelled data. This is common especially in low resourced languages menon2019 . In this paper, we discuss an implementation of a Keyword Spotting model that we use to mine local community radio content using specific keywords for a low resourced language in Uganda. We evaluate our approach on the Luganda language which is a low-resource language that is currently spoken and used in many of the Agricultural communities in Uganda.

2 Related Work

Previous work investigating crop disease surveillance utilizes different approaches. Some approaches have focused on setting up a crop disease surveillance network that relies on the use of mobile phones mutembesa2018crowdsourcing ; mutembesa2019mobile while others use satellite imagery zhang2014monitoring . The disease detection aspect of the surveillance module uses computer vision and machine learning to detect plant diseases based on leaf imaging aduwo2010automated ; mwebaze2016machine . Leaf-based approaches however rely on the use of imaging device for low-resource approaches utilizing smartphones mutembesa2018crowdsourcing ; mutembesa2019mobile ; quinn2011modeling ; Quinn2013 . This may be limited in areas with no or low smartphone adoption.

Keyword spotting for low resource languages has been implemented before menon2017radio ; saeb2017very . The approaches include used include CNNs, siamese CNNs bromley1994signature and autoencoders. Other models are designed for low computational resources such as deepresidual ; dilated_convs due to the popularity of using keyword spotting to identify commands in smartphones, battery concerns from CPU requirements comes into play. Low resource languages pose a problem as models that consume a lot of data in training fail to converge due to low volume of text corpora and speech recording.

Luganda is an almost zero-resource Bantu language, spoken in the central region of Uganda. Work on Luganda remains small compared to larger languages such as Kiwahili, Zulu and Hausa. Research on Luganda exists in machine translation luganda_text_to_speech , keyword spotting menon2017radio ; saeb2017very . Prior work on Luganda keyword spotting and radio monitoring of Luganda community radio has been initiated by menon2017radio ; saeb2017very to generate insights concerning humanitarian aid and development. While radio content is publicly available and accessible with seemingly no data/privacy restrictions, there have been few interventions seeking to mine this data for surveillance purposes particularly for crop pests and diseases.

3 Methodology

3.1 Building the Keyword Corpus

The primary source of keywords in this study are radio recordings captured from radio stations spread across Uganda. We selected 55 radio stations which are commonly listened to in the central region. For each radio station, a google search was done to find out whether it had an online radio station and whether it had its radio schedule available online. From the initial list of radio stations, 19 of them had online streams and of these at least 14 radios broadcast in Luganda. We identified radio schedules for 10 of these radio stations from the radio station websites and also by manually listening in to the stations. The purpose was to identify the time when there are talk shows particularly the agricultural ones. It was observed that for most talk shows topics of discussions are picked depending on the audience demand, the trending topic in the society or country, sponsors/advertisers or specific campaigns though still there are weekly talk shows which are focused on agriculture. The purpose was to identify the time when the talk shows were hired particularly the agricultural ones.

We collected data from online radio stations and these were recorded as 5-minute audio clips which were stored in a shared Dropbox folder. The team also identified 2 radio stations which avail their radio content online for the past 7 days as 1-hour recordings. The websites were scrapped and the audio recordings were sorted depending on whether the 1 hour was a talk show or not. After which, the talk shows were trimmed into 5 minute audio clips. The 5-minute audio clips were then played back and carefully listened to by a team of three volunteers with the purpose of identifying and extracting the commonly used agricultural terms that would be fed into the keyword spotting model.

To compliment the keywords captured from radio talkshows, we also scrapped an online local newspaper in Luganda commonly known as Bukedde111 One advantage of using online articles as a source of keywords is that there are different ways in which the same crop disease or pest is mentioned and the spelling of such words can be to is captured specifically for Luganda. The keywords were then grouped into crops, diseases, fertilizers, herbicides and general keywords. Translations were also added in two languages that is Luganda and English as well as an alternative keywords in form of a stem and this was in case the stem alone was a unique keyword.

Both the keyword sets from the local radio and online sources were then aggregated into one keyword corpus of 193 keywords. Table 1 shows an example of keywords extracted from a radio talkshow on the Fall Army Worm pest which is affecting maize.

Sample Keywords
Keyword Description Frequency (per recording)
Akasanyi Luganda term meaning worms 18 times
Obutunda Luganda term meaning passion fruits 22 times
Kasooli Luganda word meaning maize 35 times
Table 1: Aggregated Keywords from a sample radio talkshow on the fall army worm pest.

3.2 Speech Keyword Dataset

Audio data collection was performed by crowdsourcing speech utterances of the different words from the keyword list. The use of studio captured samples seemed unrealistic, to mimic real-world settings the data was collected in a natural setting with noisy environments, poor quality recording equipment, and people talking in a natural, chatty way. Rather than using high quality microphones, and in a formal setting. This was ensured through the audio data collection tool derived from open_speech where the person speaking out the words can do it using their phone or laptop wherever they are. In this study, we collected data from over 35 users who recorded the keywords in Luganda and English.

An important goal here was to record sufficient data to train the model but low enough to allow for low-resource training. We ensured that we averaged 10 utterances per keyword. Keyword spotting models are much more useful if they are speaker independent, since the process of personalizing a model to an individual requires an intrusive user interface experience. With this in mind, the recording process had to be quick and easy to use, to reduce the number of people who would fail to complete it. The collected keyword audio data was encoded in ogg vorbis format.

3.3 Data Preprocessing

In order to perform speech processing, our first step is to convert the recorded ogg keyword files to wav files. As ogg is a lossy encoding format, we used ffmpeg ffmpeg to decode the ogg vorbis files into wav audio files. The files were then transformed into 1d vectors using librosa mcfee2015librosa . Then for an audio signal with a sampling rate and a length . We use mcfee2015librosa resampling feature shown:


to normalize the sampling rate of all the samples to 8kHz.

4 Model Architecture and Design

In this study, We use a 1-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a siamese Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and time delay networks to implement keyword spotters.

4.1 1-d CNN

The 1-d CNN takes in as input the processed raw audio data. The input to the model is an array representing the audio waveform (). The network is designed to learn the set of parameters () to map the input to a prediction () according to a hierarchical feature extraction given by equation 2.


where is the number of hidden layers in the network.

The final architecture we created is a 14 layer deep neural network with five 1D convolutional layers with each with intermediate pooling layers. A dropout of 0.5 was also applied after the two successive dense layers. The final layer is a softmax activation function to map to only 10 target keywords selected randomly from the Luganda/English corpus. The model was trained using batch gradient descent with the Adam Optimizer and a learning rate of 0.001.

5 Results

As a baseline experiment we trained a baseline 5-layer densely connected network and our 1d convolutional model. We trained the model with early stopping at no improvement in validation loss for 10 epochs, model stopped at 30 epochs. We trained our model on a total of 18426 samples and validated it on 4607 and tested on 5759 samples. This model was trained on a K80 GPU on Google Colab. The evolution of loss and accuracy are shown in Figure 1. Results are shown in Table 2.

Model Accuracy Average Precision Average Recall F1 Score
Dense Baseline 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.60
1d-conv 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Table 2: Keyword Classification Prediction Results

The results show that the 1D convnet performs better than the Dense baseline model used. We see an improvement in Accuracy from 0.62 to 0.93 and similar improvement in the Average Precision and Averagae recall. The 1D convnet gives us better precision by reducing the false positive rate observed by the Dense Baseline model.

6 Conclusion and Future Direction

Using 1D convolutions for low-resource keyword spotting shows promising results. We aim to explore the usability of this work with other Bantu languages, specifically those geographically close to Luganda for example Runyankore, Kinyarwanda and Tooro as well as other linguistically further but geographically close languages such as Luo and Karamojong. We are also interested in the possibility of using transfer learning in keyword spotting in different dialects of the same language as in Acholi, Lango and Kumam for Luo and different but linguistically related languages such as Runyankore.


  • [1] Mutembesa, D. and Omongo, C. & Mwebaze, E. (2018) Crowdsourcing real-time viral disease and pest information: A case of nation-wide cassava disease surveillance in a developing country. Sixth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
  • [2] Mutembesa, D., Mwebaze, E., Nsumba, S., Omongo, C. & Mutaasa, H. (2019) Mobile community sensing with smallholder farmers in a developing nation; A scaled pilot for crop health monitoring., arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07047
  • [3] Menon, R., Saeb, A., Cameron, H., Kibira, W., Quinn, J., & Niesler, Thomas (2017) Radio-browsing for developmental monitoring in Uganda. In G. Tesauro, D.S. Touretzky and T.K. Leen (eds.), IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 5795–5799. IEEE
  • [4] Saeb, A., Menon, R., Cameron, H., Kibira, W., Quinn, J. & Niesler, Thomas. (2017) Very Low Resource Radio Browsing for Agile Developmental and Humanitarian Monitoring., INTERSPEECH, pp. 2118–2122.
  • [5] Nakabugu, S.B. (2001) The role of rural radio in agricultural and rural development translating agricultural research information into messages for farm audiences, First International Workshop on Farm Radio Broadcasting, pp. 19–22.
  • [6] Mwebaze, E. & Owomugisha, G. (2016) Machine learning for plant disease incidence and severity measurements from leaf images., 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 158–163. IEEE.
  • [7] Quinn, J. (2013) Computational Techniques for Crop Disease Monitoring in the Developing World., Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XII, pp. 13–18. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • [8] Quinn, J.A., Leyton-Brown, K. & Mwebaze, E. (2011) Modeling and monitoring crop disease in developing countries, Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • [9] Tang, R. & Lin, J.. (2018) Deep Residual Learning for Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting., IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 609–616. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • [10] Coucke, A., Chlieh, M., Gisselbrecht, T., Leroy, D., Poumeyrol, M. & Lavril, T. (2019) Efficient Keyword Spotting Using Dilated Convolutions and Gating, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 609–616. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • [11] Nandutu, I. (2016) Luganda Text-to-Speech Machine., School of Computing and Engineering, Uganda Technology and Management University.
  • [12] McFee, B., Raffel, C., Liang, D., Ellis, D.P.W., McVicar, M., Battenberg, E. & Nieto, O. (2015) Librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in python, Proceedings of the 14th python in science conference
  • [13] FFmpeg,
  • [14] Warden, P. (2017) Open Speech Recording,
  • [15] Menon, R., Kamper, H., van der Westhuizen, E., Quinn, J. & Niesler, T. (2019) Feature exploration for almost zero-resource ASR-free keyword spotting using a multilingual bottleneck extractor and correspondence autoencoders, INTERSPEECH
  • [16] Aduwo, J. R., Mwebaze, E. & Quinn, J. A. (2010) Automated Vision-Based Diagnosis of Cassava Mosaic Disease., Industrial Conference on Data Mining-Workshops, pp. 114–122.
  • [17] Zhang, J., Pu, R., Yuan, L., Wang, J., Huang, W., & Yang, G. (2014) Monitoring powdery mildew of winter wheat by using moderate resolution multi-temporal satellite imagery., PloS one, 9(4),pp. e93107. Public Library of Science.
  • [18] Bromley, J., Guyon, I., LeCun, Y. and Säckinger, E., Shah, R. (1994) Signature verification using a "siamese" time delay neural network., Advances in neural information processing systems, 9(4),pp. 737–744.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description