Dark-bright solitons in two-component BECs

Interaction of dark-bright solitons in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates

S. Rajendran, P. Muruganandam and M. Lakshmanan Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli 620 024, India Department of Physics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli 620 024, India
Abstract

We study the interaction of dark-bright solitons in two component Bose-Einstein condensates by suitably tailoring the trap potential, atomic scattering length and atom gain or loss. We show that the coupled Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation can be mapped onto the Manakov model. An interesting class of matter wave solitons and their interaction are identified with time independent and periodically modulated trap potentials, which can be experimentally realized in two component condensates. These include periodic collapse and revival of solitons, and snake-like matter wave solitons as well as different kinds of two soliton interactions.

pacs:
5.45.Yv, 03.75.Lm, 67.85.Fg
: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.

Keywords: Multi-component Bose-Einstein condensates, Manakov Model, Solitons

The advent of solitons in ultra cold quantum gases has provided a new insight into the understanding of the localized wave packets that travel over long distances without attenuation. In this context, recent explorations of solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) have paved the way for new developments in manipulating coherent matter waves for applications, including atom interferometry, coherent atom transport and quantum information processing or quantum computation. In particular, experimental observations of matter wave solitons of the dark [1, 2], and bright [3, 4, 5] types in BECs have attracted a great deal of attention in connection with the dynamics of nonlinear matter waves, including soliton propagation [6, 7], vortex dynamics [8], interference patterns [9] and domain walls in binary BECs [10].

In this connection, recently much effort has been given to the study of matter wave solitons in BECs with time varying control parameters such as (i) variation of atomic scattering length which can be achieved through Feshbach resonance [11, 12, 13, 14, 15], (ii) inclusion of appropriate time dependent gain or loss term which can be phenomenologically incorporated to account for the interaction of atomic cloud or thermal cloud, and (iii) periodic modulation of trap frequencies [16]. Bright solitons created in the experiments are themselves condensates and propagated over much larger distances than dark solitons which, on the other hand, can only exist as notches or holes within the condensates [1, 2]. Recently, dark solitons, their oscillations and interaction have been demonstrated in experiments with single component BECs [17, 18, 19]. Many studies on the bright/dark soliton formation and propagation of attractive/repulsive BECs have been focussed mainly on the single species systems.

Multi-component generalization of the soliton dynamics is very natural in the context of atomic BECs because of the several ways to create such systems, for example as mixtures with two different atomic species/hyperfine states [20, 21, 22], and as internal degrees of freedom liberated under an optical trap and atom-molecule BECs [23]. The multicomponent BECs, far from being a trivial extension of the single component ones, present novel and fundamentally different scenarios for their ground states and excitations [24, 25]. Matter wave solitons in multicomponent BECs hold promise for a number of applications, including the multi-channel signals and their switching, coherent storage and processing of optical fields.

Since multi-component BECs are of greater interest for the aforesaid reasons, in this letter we investigate the interaction of dark and bright solitons in two component BECs. In the context of cold atomic gases, the two vector components which evolve under the Gross-Pitaevskii equation are the macroscopic wave functions of Bose condensed atoms in two different internal states, which we shall denote as and . If one considers condensates of, for instance, Na and Rb atoms, the nonlinear interactions are due to elastic s-wave scattering among the atoms, and are effectively repulsive (positive scattering length) for both the systems in which multi-component condensates have been realized [26]. Very recently, there has been a tremendous interest in studying the dynamics of two-component Bose-Einstein condensates coupled to the environment using both experimental and theoretical means [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. Here we bring out exact bright-dark solitons in repulsively interacting two-component BECs coupled with the thermal clouds, which introduce gain/loss of condensate atoms. In particular, by considering both time independent and periodically modulated trap potentials, we show fascinating interactions of matter wave solitons.

For the above purpose, we consider a trapped BEC with two components, where the dynamics takes place only in one dimension due to the strong trap confinement in the transverse direction. We have also included the interaction of external thermal clouds which is described by gain or loss term. The properties of BECs that are prepared in two hyperfine states can be described at sufficiently low temperatures by the dimensionless form of two coupled GP equations as [33]

(1)

Here is the external potential, , is the trap frequency in the axial direction, is the radial trap frequency ( for expulsive potential and for confining potential), is the chemical potential, , is the -wave scattering length, is the Bohr radius and and , is the gain/loss term, which is the phenomenologically incorporated interaction of thermal cloud  [34, 35, 36]. Here we have considered the case of a two-component condensate with Rb atoms prepared in two different hyperfine states for which the atomic masses, intra- and inter-component atomic scattering lengths are equal as described in Ref. [17]. Note that in equation (1), the variable actually represents , where , and similarly stands for .

In equation (1) when the gain/loss term is positive, it leads to the mechanism of loading external atoms (thermal clouds) into the BEC by optical pumping while describes a BEC that is continuously depleted (loss) of atoms. If the condensate is fed by a surrounding thermal cloud, then the condensate undergoes an appropriate growth/collapse. In actual BEC experiments, for example, with Li and Rb atoms, the atomic scattering length can be varied by suitably tuning the external magnetic field through the Feshbach resonance as [3, 4, 15]

(2)

where is scattering length of condensed atoms, is the external time varying magnetic field, is the resonance magnetic field and is the resonance width. Similar tuning of scattering length should be possible for two component condensates as well, for example in the case of hyperfine states of Rb.

Using the following point transformation [37, 38, 39, 40]

(3)

equation (1) can be reduced to the set of two coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations (2CNLS) of the form

(4)

where , , , , (, : constants), and and have to satisfy the condition

(5)

which is a Riccati type equation for . Equation (4) is the so called defocussing Manakov system, which exhibits interesting one, two and -soliton solutions of bright-bright, dark-dark and dark-bright types [41, 42, 43]. Concentrating for the present only on dark-bright solitons, from the solutions of equation (4), one can straightforwardly construct the one, two and dark-bright soliton solutions for equation (1), provided , and satisfy equation (5). We may note here that because of the complicated transformation involved above, the resultant soliton parameters are no longer constants but are functions of and . Therefore, the resultant soliton solutions may be considered as generalized solitons and not simple standard solitons.

One-soliton dynamics:-

The dark-bright components of the one-soliton solution of the defocussing Manakov system (4) can be given as

(6)
(7)

where , , , . The parameters and correspond to the amplitude and velocity of the soliton envelope, respectively, and refers to the phase.

Now using the transformation (3), the corresponding dark-bright one-soliton solution of the two coupled GP equation can be written as

(8)

Two soliton dynamics:-

The dark-bright two-soliton solution of the defocussing Manakov system (4) can be written as

(9)
(10)

where

, , , , , The dark-bright two soliton solution of the two coupled GP equation (1) can be again represented by equations (8) with and of the forms (9) and (10). The procedure can be extended to -soliton solutions also. However, we do not present their forms here. Depending on the form of the trap potential, gain/loss and interatomic interaction novel type of dark-bright matter wave solitons can be deduced using the above forms (8)-(10). In the following, we demonstrate them for two simple trap potentials. For the other choices, results will be presented elsewhere. In the present study we fixed the trap parameters similar to that used in a recent experiment on dark-bright solitons in two component Rb condensates [17].

Time independent trap potential:-

First let us consider, as an example, the case of time independent expulsive parabolic trap potential, for which the integrablity condition (5) gives .

Figure 1: (Color online) Choice of the atomic scattering length and gain or loss term as a function of time that exhibits dark-bright solitons for (a) time independent expulsive trap potential, and (b) Periodic modulated trap potential, .

The amplitude of the wave packet is given by . Different types of soliton solutions can be constructed for suitably chosen gain term . In figure 1(a), we plot the gain , and the corresponding choice of atomic scattering length , which may be realized by tuning the external magnetic field as

(11)

We point out here that such a form of scattering length has been realized in Li and Rb atoms [3, 4, 15]. Figure 2(a) shows the dark-bright one soliton solution for the above gain term where the amplitude of the wave packet remains constant. On the other hand, if we choose a periodic gain term, , the amplitude shows oscillatory behaviour leading to periodic collapse and revival phenomena, see figure 2(b).

Figure 2: Dynamics of dark (left) and bright (right) components of the one soliton in an expulsive trap potential for (a) and (b) . The parameters are fixed at , , , , and .
Figure 3: Contour plots of two soliton interactions showing dark (left) and bright (right) components in the presence of expulsive trap potential. (a) Strong beating of two soliton bound states without interaction for , , , , , (b) soliton interaction with beating for , , , , , and (c) elastic collision of two solitons for , , , , . Here axis represents time in ms with for (a), for (b), and for (c). axis corresponds to the axial coordinate in m, with for (a) and (b), and for (c). The other parameters are and .

We have also investigated different types of two soliton interactions for the gain term by suitably choosing the parameters , , , and in equations (9) and (10). Figure 3(a) shows the interaction of dark and bright two solitons with strong beating effect without interaction while figure 3(b) illustrates interaction of two solitons with beating effect. Figure 3(c) shows the soliton interactions without beating. These type of soliton interactions are well known in the fiber optics context [42].

Periodically modulated potential:-

If we choose and , we get and the integrability condition (5) gives which is a periodically modulated trap. For the above case, we sketch the gain and the corresponding choice of atomic scattering length in figure 1(b), which may be realized by periodically tuning the external magnetic field as

Figure 4: Dynamics of dark component (a) and bright component (b) of snake-like one soliton in the presence of periodic modulated harmonic potential. The parameters are , , , , and .
(12)

Figure 4(a) shows the snake-like effect of the one soliton solution for periodically modulated trap potential with and . Similar snake effect has been demonstrated recently in scalar coupled nonautonomous NLS equations in BEC [39] and in the context of optical solitons [44]. Next we analyse different types of two soliton interactions for the periodically modulated potential and suitable choice of other parameters. Figure 5(a) shows the dark and bright non-interacting moving two solitons again with strong beating effect in bound state, where the velocities are zero () for , . Figure 5(b) shows non-interacting moving two solitons again with strong beating effect in unbound state for , , . Figure 5(c) depicts the interacting two solitons with beating effect for . Finally figure 5(d) depicts the two soliton interaction without beating effect for .

Figure 5: Contour plots of matter wave soliton interactions of dark (left) and bright (right) components in a periodically modulated trap potential (a) noninteracting two soliton with strong beating effect in bound state for , , , (b) noninteracting two soliton with strong beating effect in bound state for , , , (c) two soliton interactions with beating effect for , , , , (d) two soliton interactions without beating effect for , , , . The other parameters are , , and . Here axis represents time in ms with and axis corresponds to the axial coordinate in m, with .

Recent experimental studies show the above types of dark and dark-bright soliton oscillations and interactions in single and two component BECs [17, 18, 19]. However these experiments do not consider the interaction of thermal cloud or time dependent interatomic interaction. Our above studies clearly suggest the possibility of observing them in experiments.

In summary, we have investigated the exact dark-bright one and two soliton solutions of the two-component BECs with time varying parameters such as s-wave scattering length and gain/loss term. On mapping the two coupled GP equation onto the coupled NLS equation under certain conditions, we have deduced different kinds of dark-bright one soliton solutions and interaction of two solitons for time independent and periodically modulated trap potentials. The present study provides an understanding of the possible mechanism for soliton excitations in multi-component BECs. These excitations can be realized in experiments by suitable control of time dependent trap parameters, atomic interaction and interaction with thermal cloud.

This work is supported in part by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India - DST-IRHPA project (SR and ML), and DST Ramanna Fellowship (ML). The work of PM forms part of DST-FTYS project (Ref. No. SR/FTP/PS-79/2005).

References

References

  • [1] Burger S, Bongs K, Dettmer S, Ertmer W, Sengstock K, Sanpera A, Shlyapnikov G V and Lewenstein M 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 5198–5201
  • [2] Denschlag J, Simsarian J E, Feder D L, Clark C W, Collins L A, Cubizolles J, Deng L, Hagley E W, Helmerson K, Reinhardt W P, Rolston S L, Schneider B I and Phillips W D 2000 Science 287 97–101
  • [3] Strecker K E, Partridge G B, Truscott A G and Hulet R G 2002 Nature 417 150–153
  • [4] Khaykovich L, Schreck F, Ferrari G, Bourdel T, Cubizolles J, Carr L D, Castin Y and Salomon C 2002 Science 296 1290–1293
  • [5] Cornish S L, Thompson T and Wieman C E 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 170401
  • [6] Busch T and Anglin J R 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2298–2301
  • [7] Salasnich L 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 053617
  • [8] Rosenbusch P, Bretin V and Dalibard J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 200403
  • [9] Liu W M, Wu B and Niu Q 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2294–2297
  • [10] Malomed B A, Nistazakis H E, Frantzeskakis D J and Kevrekidis P G 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 043616
  • [11] Moerdijk A J, Verhaar B J and Axelsson A 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 4852–4861
  • [12] Roberts J L, Claussen N R, Burke J P, Greene C H, Cornell E A and Wieman C E 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5109–5112
  • [13] Stenger J, Inouye S, Andrews M R, Miesner H J, Stamper-Kurn D M and Ketterle W 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2422–2425
  • [14] Cornish S L, Claussen N R, Roberts J L, Cornell E A and Wieman C E 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1795–1798
  • [15] Courteille P, Freeland R S, Heinzen D J, van Abeelen F A and Verhaar B J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 69
  • [16] Janis J, Banks M and Bigelow N P 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 013422
  • [17] Backer C, Stellmer S, Soltan-Panahi P, Dorscher S, Baumert M, Richter E M, Kronjäger J, Bongs K, Sengstock and Klaus 2008 Nature Phys. 4 496–501
  • [18] Weller A, Ronzheimer J P, Gross C, Frantzeskakis D J, Theocharis G, Kevrekidis P G, Esteve J and Oberthaler M K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 130401
  • [19] Stellmer S, Becker C, Soltan-Panahi P, Richter E M, Dörscher S, Baumert M, Kronjäger J, Bongs K and Sengstock K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 120406
  • [20] Myatt C J, Burt E A, Ghrist R W, Cornell E A and Wieman C E 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 586–589
  • [21] Stenger J, Inouye S, Stamper-Kurn D M, Miesner H J, Chikkatur A P and Ketterle W 1998 Nature 396 345–348
  • [22] Papp S B, Pino J M and Wieman C E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 040402
  • [23] Woo S J, Park Q H and Bigelow N P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 120403
  • [24] Esry B D and Greene C H 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 1265–1271
  • [25] Busch T, Cirac J I, Pérez-García V M and Zoller P 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 2978–2983
  • [26] Bongs K, Burger S, Dettmer S, Hellweg D, Arlt J, Ertmer W and Sengstock K 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 031602
  • [27] Syassen N, Bauer D, Lettner M, Volz Tand Dietze D, García-Ripoll J J, Cirac J I, Rempe G and Dürr S 2008 Science 320 1329–1331
  • [28] Anglin J 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 6–9
  • [29] Ruostekoski J and Walls D F 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 R50–R53
  • [30] Vardi A and Anglin J R 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 568–571
  • [31] Ponomarev A V, nero J M, Kolovsky A R and Buchleitner A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 050404
  • [32] Wang W, Fu L B and Yi X X 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 045601
  • [33] Busch T and Anglin J R 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 010401
  • [34] Köhl M, Davis M J, Gardiner C W, Hänsch T W and Esslinger T 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 080402
  • [35] Miesner H J, Stamper-Kurn D M, Andrews M R, Durfee D S, Inouye S and Ketterle W 1998 Science 279 1005–1007
  • [36] Gerton J M, Strekalov D, Prodan I and Hulet R G 2000 Nature 408 692–695
  • [37] Gürses M 2007 Integrable nonautonomous nonlinear Schrödinger equations arXiv:0704.2435
  • [38] Serkin V N, Hasegawa A and Belyaeva T L 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 074102
  • [39] Rajendran S, Muruganandam P and Lakshmanan M 2008 Bright and dark solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates arXiv:0812.5073
  • [40] Kundu A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 015601(R)
  • [41] Radhakrishnan R and Lakshmanan M 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 2683
  • [42] Sheppard A P and Kivshar Y S 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 4773–4782
  • [43] Vijayajayanthi M, Kanna T and Lakshmanan M 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 013820
  • [44] Serkin V N and Hasegawa A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4502–4505
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
119925
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description