Hyperon polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions and gravity-related anomaly

Hyperon polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions and gravity-related anomaly

Mircea Baznat baznat@theor.jinr.ru Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna (Moscow region), Russia Institute of Applied Physics, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, MD-2028 Kishinev, Moldova    Konstantin Gudima gudima@cc.acad.md Institute of Applied Physics, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, MD-2028 Kishinev, Moldova    Alexander Sorin sorin@theor.jinr.ru    Oleg Teryaev teryaev@theor.jinr.ru Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna (Moscow region), Russia National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia Dubna International University, 141980, Dubna, Russia
July 11, 2019
Abstract

We study the energy dependence of global polarization of hyperons in peripheral collisions. We combine the calculation of vorticity and strange chemical potential in the framework of kinetic Quark-Gluon String Model with the anomalous mechanism related to axial vortical effect. We pay special attention to the temperature dependent contribution related to gravitational anomaly and found that the preliminary RHIC data are compatible with its suppression discovered earlier in lattice calculations.

pacs:
25.75.-q

I Introduction

The experimental evidences for polarization of hyperons in heavy-ion collisions found by STAR collaboration Lisa () attracted recently much attention Becattini:2016gvu (); Karpenko:2016jyx (); Karpenko:2016idy (); Xie:2015xpa (); Fang:2016uds ().

The studies of polarization are often performed Becattini:2013vja () in the framework of approach exploring local equilibrium thermodynamics Becattini:2014yxa () and hydrodynamical calculations of vorticity Betz:2007kg (); Csernai:2013bqa (); Csernai:2014hva ().

There is another (although related Prokhorov:2017atp ()) approach to polarization first proposed in Rogachevsky:2010ys () and independently in Gao:2012ix (). The so-called axial vortical effect (see e.g. Kalaydzhyan:2014bfa () and references therein) being the macroscopic manifestation of axial anomaly Son:2009tf () leads to induced axial current of strange quarks which may be converted to polarization of -hyperons Rogachevsky:2010ys (); Gao:2012ix ().

The effect is proportional to vorticity and helicity of the strong interacting medium, and, in particular, to helicity separation effect discovered Baznat:2013zx () in the kinetic Quark-Gluon-String Model(QGSM)toneev83 (); toneev90 (); amelin91 () and confirmed Teryaev:2015gxa () in HSD Cassing:1999es () model. This helicity separation effect receives Baznat:2013zx (); Teryaev:2015gxa () the significant contribution from the transverse component of velocity and vorticity. It is easily explained Baznat:2013zx () by the same signs of transverse vorticities in the ”upper” and ”lower” (w.r.t. reaction plane) half-spaces, combined with the opposite signs of velocities. At the same time, even larger contribution Baznat:2013zx (); Teryaev:2015gxa () of longitudinal components of velocity and vorticity implies the appearance of the ”quadrupole” structure of longitudinal vorticity, recently found Becattini:2017gcx () in the hydrodynamical approach.

Indeed, the opposite values of longitudinal velocities in the ”left” and ”right” (w.r.t. to ”vertical” plane normal to reaction one and containing the beams direction) require exactly the quadrupole structure of longitudinal vorticities in the quater-spaces formed by the intersection of reaction and vertical planes:

(1)
(2)
(3)

where is the contribution of the respective component of velocity and vorticity to the helicity density. It is this quadrupole structure of vorticity that leads to the up-down mirror structure of helicity after multiplication by the left-right mirror structure of velocity:

To make (2) applicable and observe the quadrupole picture one needs to average the longitudinal velocity and vorticity over the cylinder symmetric w.r.t. the plane . Otherwize, taking the different slices , longitudinal velocity is not, generally speaking, changing sign with . The dependence of the quadrupole picture over the height of tghis cylinder is represented at Figure 1.

Figure 1: Quadrupole structure of average longitudinal vorticity for different heights of the cylinders in direction (see text).

Later more detailed calculations were performed Baznat:2015eca (), including the structure of emergent vortex sheets, as well as spatial and temporal dependence of strange chemical potential which is also the ingredient of anomalous approach to polarization.

Ii Anomalous mechanism of hyperon polarization

Anomalous mechanism of polarization makes this effect qualitatively similar to the local violation Fukushima:2008xe () of discrete symmetries in strongly interacting QCD matter. The most well known here is the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) which uses the (C)P-violating (electro)magnetic field emerging in heavy ion collisions in order to probe the (C)P-odd effects in QCD matter.

The polarization, in turn, is similar to Chiral Vortical Effect (CVE)Kharzeev:2007tn () due to coupling to P-odd medium vorticity leading to the induced electromagnetic and all conserved-charge currents Rogachevsky:2010ys (), in particular the baryonic one.

Recently the pioneering preliminary results on global polarization of and hyperons in collisions in Beam Energy Scan at RHIC were released Lisa () and the qualitative tendency of polarization decrease with energy in agreement with the prediction Rogachevsky:2010ys () was revealed. The recent theoretical analysis Sorin:2016smp () suggested that decrease of polarization with energy is related to the suppression of Axial Magnetic effect contribution in strongly correlated QCD matter found in lattice simulations.

Indeed, the chiral vorticity coefficient describing the axial vortical effect

(4)

contains temperature dependent term related to gravitational anomaly Landsteiner:2011iq (), and naively it can be quite substantial and increase with energy. However, lattice simulations Braguta:2016pwq () lead to the zero result in the confined phase and to the suppression by one order of magnitude at high temperatures. Neglecting axial chemical potential, the coefficient takes the form

(5)

.

As soon as for free fermion gas the term is recovered Buividovich:2013jba () for large lattice volume at fixed temperature, the above-mentioned suppression should be attributed to the correlation effects. It was suggestedSorin:2016smp (), that the accurate measurements of polarization energy dependence may serve a sensitive probe of strongly correlated QCD matter. In the current paper we perform numerical simulations to implement this suggestion.

The polarization is related Baznat:2013zx (); Sorin:2016smp () to the strange axial charge

(6)

and as a result the quark and hadronic observables are related, that is of special importance in the confined phase. Another approach to confined phase is provided by consideration Teryaev:2017nro () of the vortices in pionic superfluid, whose cores are associated with polarized baryons

Iii Numerical simulations of axial anomaly contributions to (anti)hyperon polarization

We performed the numerical simulations in QGSM model toneev83 (); toneev90 (); amelin91 (). We decomposed the space-time to the cells, allowing to define velocity and vorticity in the kinetic model, as described in detail in Baznat:2013zx (). To define the strange chemical potential (assuming that polarization is carried by strange quark) we used the matching procedure Baznat:2015eca () of distribution functions to its (local) equilibrium values. In this paper, we also determine in this way the values of temperature. In general, let us stress that we realized in our particular case the relation between kinetics, hydrodynamics and thermodynamics.

We first neglect the gravitational anomaly contribution and start by considering the energy dependence of polarization (described in detail in Sorin:2016smp ()) for three values of impact parameter. The results are presented at Figure 2. The curves correspond to .

Figure 2: Energy dependence of polarization for different values of impact parameter.

We continue by the inclusion of contribution related to gravitational anomaly, which is the central issue of this paper. The results are presented at Figure 3. We consider as a starting point the original value of anomaly coefficientLandsteiner:2011iq () which is reproduced for large lattice volume at fixed temperatureBuividovich:2013jba (). We present the curves following from the coefficients suppressed by factor (5) resulting from the lattice calculations Braguta:2016pwq (). We compare values of with . As one can see, the lattice-supported value is most close to the behavior of preliminary data which may be considered as a signal of strongly correlated matter formation. The closeness of curve to the experimental points may be related to the contribution of confinement phase, where lattice calculations Braguta:2016pwq () lead to zero temperature-dependent effect. At the same time, already leads to the curve growing with energy, while leads to extremely strong growth.

Figure 3: Energy dependence of polarization for different values of gravitational anomaly contribution.

The polarization is emerging due to the polarization of quarks, which has the same sign, as the axial current and charge are C-even operators. The magnitude of the is larger as the same axial charge is distributed between the polarizations of the smaller number of particles Sorin:2016smp (). It is mandatory to take into account the contribution of mesons. In the case of the mesons contain two sea(anti)quarks and does not change the polarization significantly. At the same time, for the relevant mesons are more numerous and make the excess of polarization less pronounced.

Note that this excess is larger for smaller energies, where suppression of is larger. This differs from the (C-odd) effect of magnetic field, which is increasing with energy, although more detailed studies taking into account the finite time of magnetic field existence are required.

The quantitative analysis of these effects, taking into account the gravitational anomaly contribution, is presented at Figure 4.

Figure 4: Comparison of and polarizations for different values of gravitational anomaly contribution.

The result is in reasonable agreement with STAR data, although further analysis is required.

Iv Conclusions and Outlook

We numerically studied the generation of polarization by the anomalous mechanism (Axial Vortical Effect) and compared it with the observed data.

First we neglected the gravitational anomaly related temperature dependent contribution when the decrease of chemical potential with energy leads, in turn, to the decrease of polarization. We considered this effect for three impact parameters.

We also included the contribution related to gravitational anomaly proportional to and studied its possible suppression in strongly correlated matter. We found that the preliminary data are in accordance with suppression effect found on the lattice.

We also considered the polarization of hyperons, taking into account the contribution of mesons. We found that the polarization is larger than that of and is growing at smaller energies.

The further more accurate measurements of polarization should provide the additional check of gravitational anomaly related contribution.

The useful discussions with F. Becattini, V. Braguta, S. Voloshin and V.Zakharov are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 17-02-01108.

References

  • (1) L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR Collaboration], arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex].
  • (2) F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal and S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 95, no. 5, 054902 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054902 [arXiv:1610.02506 [nucl-th]].
  • (3) I. Karpenko and F. Becattini, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no. 4, 213 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4765-1 [arXiv:1610.04717 [nucl-th]].
  • (4) I. Karpenko and F. Becattini, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 779, no. 1, 012068 (2017) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/779/1/012068 [arXiv:1611.08136 [nucl-th]].
  • (5) Y. Xie, R. C. Glastad and L. P. Csernai, Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) no.6, 064901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.064901 [arXiv:1505.07221 [nucl-th]].
  • (6) R. h. Fang, J. y. Pang, Q. Wang and X. n. Wang, arXiv:1611.04670 [nucl-th].
  • (7) F. Becattini, L. Csernai and D. J. Wang, “ polarization in peripheral heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 88, no. 3, 034905 (2013) [arXiv:1304.4427 [nucl-th]].
  • (8) F. Becattini, L. Bucciantini, E. Grossi and L. Tinti, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no. 5, 191 (2015) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3384-y [arXiv:1403.6265 [hep-th]].
  • (9) B. Betz, M. Gyulassy and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 044901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.044901 [arXiv:0708.0035 [nucl-th]].
  • (10) L. P. Csernai, V. K. Magas and D. J. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) no.3, 034906 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034906 [arXiv:1302.5310 [nucl-th]].
  • (11) L. P. Csernai, D. J. Wang and T. Csorgo, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) no.2, 024901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024901 [arXiv:1406.1017 [hep-ph]].
  • (12) G. Prokhorov and O. Teryaev, arXiv:1707.02491 [hep-th].
  • (13) O. Rogachevsky, A. Sorin and O. Teryaev, “Chiral vortaic effect and neutron asymmetries in heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 054910 (2010) [arXiv:1006.1331 [hep-ph]].
  • (14) J. -H. Gao, Z. -T. Liang, S. Pu, Q. Wang and X. -N. Wang, “Chiral Anomaly and Local Polarization Effect from Quantum Kinetic Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 232301 (2012) [arXiv:1203.0725 [hep-ph]].
  • (15) T. Kalaydzhyan, “Temperature dependence of the chiral vortical effects,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 10, 105012 (2014) [arXiv:1403.1256 [hep-th]].
  • (16) D.T. Son and P. Surowka, “Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191601 (2009) [arXiv:0906.5044 [hep-th]].
  • (17) M. Baznat, K. Gudima, A. Sorin and O. Teryaev, “Helicity separation in Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 88, 061901 (2013) [arXiv:1301.7003 [nucl-th]].
  • (18) V.D. Toneev, K.K. Gudima, Nucl. Phys. A 400, 173c (1983).
  • (19) V.D. Toneev, N.S. Amelin, K.K. Gudima, S.Yu. Sivoklokov, Nucl. Phys. A 519, 463c (1990).
  • (20) N.S. Amelin, E.F. Staubo, L.S. Csernai et al., Phys.Rev. C 44, 1541 (1991).
  • (21) O. Teryaev and R. Usubov, Phys. Rev. C 92, no. 1, 014906 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014906
  • (22) W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rept. 308, 65 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00028-3
  • (23) Plenary talks of F. Becattini and S. Voloshin at SQM-2017, Utrecht, July 11-15; F. Becattini and I. Karpenko, arXiv:1707.07984 [nucl-th].
  • (24) M. I. Baznat, K. K. Gudima, A. S. Sorin and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. C 93, no. 3, 031902 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.031902 [arXiv:1507.04652 [nucl-th]].
  • (25) K. Fukushima, D.E. Kharzeev and H.J. Warringa, “The Chiral Magnetic Effect,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008) [arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]].
  • (26) D. Kharzeev and A. Zhitnitsky, “Charge separation induced by P-odd bubbles in QCD matter,” Nucl. Phys. A 797, 67 (2007) [arXiv:0706.1026 [hep-ph]].
  • (27) A. Sorin and O. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. C 95, no. 1, 011902 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.011902 [arXiv:1606.08398 [nucl-th]].
  • (28) K. Landsteiner, E. Megias, L. Melgar and F. Pena-Benitez, “Holographic Gravitational Anomaly and Chiral Vortical Effect,” JHEP 1109 (2011) 121
  • (29) V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, K. Landsteiner, M.I. Polikarpov, M.V. Ulybyshev Phys.Rev. D88 (2013) 071501 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.071501 e-Print: arXiv:1303.6266 [hep-lat]; V. Braguta, M.N. Chernodub, V.A. Goy, K. Landsteiner, A.V. Molochkov, M.I. Polikarpov, Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) no.7, 074510 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074510 e-Print: arXiv:1401.8095 [hep-lat]; V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, K. Landsteiner, A. V. Molochkov and M. Ulybyshev, “Study of axial magnetic effect,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1701, 030002 (2016); doi:10.1063/1.4938608; V. Goy, ”Investigation of SU(2) gluodynamics in the framework of the latice approach”, PhD Thesis (in Russian), Vladivostok, 2015.
  • (30) P. V. Buividovich, “Axial Magnetic Effect and Chiral Vortical Effect with free lattice chiral fermions,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 607, no. 1, 012018 (2015) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/607/1/012018 [arXiv:1309.4966 [hep-lat]].
  • (31) O. V. Teryaev and V. I. Zakharov, “From the chiral vortical effect to polarization of baryons: A model,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 096023 (2017). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.096023
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
212443
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description