Hyper Wide Field Imaging of the Local Group Dwarf Irregular Galaxy IC 1613: An Extended Component of Metal-poor Stars

Hyper Wide Field Imaging of the Local Group Dwarf Irregular Galaxy IC 1613: An Extended Component of Metal-poor Stars

Ragadeepika Pucha11affiliation: Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA , Jeffrey L. Carlin22affiliation: Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA , Beth Willman11affiliation: Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 33affiliation: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA , Jay Strader44affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA , David J. Sand11affiliation: Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA , Keith Bechtol22affiliation: Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 55affiliation: Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA , Jean P. Brodie66affiliation: University of California Observatories, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA , Denija Crnojević77affiliation: University of Tampa, 401 West Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33606, USA , Duncan A. Forbes88affiliation: Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia , Christopher Garling99affiliation: CCAPP, Department of Physics, and Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA , Jonathan Hargis1010affiliation: Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA , Annika H. G. Peter88affiliation: Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia , Aaron J. Romanowsky66affiliation: University of California Observatories, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 1111affiliation: Department of Physics & Astronomy, San José State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192, USA rpucha@email.arizona.edu
Abstract

Stellar halos offer direct fossil evidence for hierarchical structure formation. Since halo assembly is predicted to be scale-free, the properties of stellar halos around low-mass galaxies set strong constraints on star formation in the accreted subhalos and on the formation of all dwarf galaxies. However, few observational searches for stellar halos in dwarfs exist. Here we present g and i photometry of resolved stars in the isolated Local Group dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613 (. These Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam observations are the widest and deepest observations of IC 1613 to date. We measure surface density profiles of young main-sequence stars, intermediate to old red-giant branch stars, and ancient horizontal branch stars outside of ( kpc; 2.5 half-light radii) from the center of the galaxy. All of the populations extend out to ( kpc; 5 half-light radii), with the older populations best fit by a broken exponential in these outer regions. Comparing with earlier studies sensitive to IC 1613’s inner regions shows that the stellar density of the old stellar populations steepens substantially with distance from the center, and we trace the effective surface brightness down to an extremely faint limit of mag arcsec (in the band). Conversely, the distribution of younger stars follows a single, shallow exponential profile in the outer regions, demonstrating different formation channels for the younger and older components of IC 1613. The outermost, intermediate-age and old stars have properties consistent with those expected for accreted stellar halos, though future observational and theoretical work is needed to definitively distinguish this scenario from other possibilities.

1 Introduction

Figure 1: DSS image ( in size) centered on IC 1613 with the white circle showing the diameter field-of-view of our HSC observations. The center of the field, , is marked. Inset: Color composite of IC 1613 from SDSS images (image credits: www.legacysurvey.org).

The outskirts of galaxies are important testing grounds for galaxy formation and evolution. The currently accepted CDM model of hierarchical structure formation implies that dark matter halos grow via mergers and the accretion of smaller halos (White & Rees, 1978; Springel et al., 2006, and references therein). Such interactions leave imprints on the outer regions of galaxies. The long dynamical timescales in these outer regions preserve the fossil evidence of their formation. Studying the outskirts of a galaxy can therefore reveal its formation history (e.g., Bullock & Johnston, 2005).

Extensive observational and theoretical work shows that the two nearest massive galaxies, the Milky Way and M31, have distinct halo properties that reflect the diversity of assembly histories expected in CDM.

The outskirts of the Milky Way reveal an almost spherical distribution of old population stars with large random motions. This “stellar halo” constitutes just % of the total stellar mass of the galaxy, but has provided many clues to the Milky Way’s formation (see Helmi 2008 review). Searle & Zinn (1978) suggested that the halo is built-up from the remnants of disrupted dwarf galaxies. The stellar halo is also predicted to include stars that were formed in situ (i.e, in the inner regions of the galaxies) but got displaced to the halo because of mergers (Zolotov et al., 2009). Recent surveys confirm these predictions in the form of many complex structures and tidal streams in the stellar halo of the Galaxy, as well as a more diffuse halo component (e.g., Belokurov, 2013; Shipp et al., 2018). The evidence for hierarchical assembly of M31 is nearly as extensive, with many coherent streams and other tidal structures (McConnachie et al., 2009), though, notably, M31’s stellar halo is more metal-rich and massive than that of the Milky Way (e.g., Ibata et al. 2014).

This work on the Milky Way and M31, as well as voluminous evidence in more distant galaxies (e.g., Martínez-Delgado et al. 2010; Crnojević et al. 2016; Monachesi et al. 2016) has confirmed that dwarf galaxies are indeed the building blocks of the stellar halos of massive galaxies.

Since structure formation in CDM is scale invariant, dwarf galaxies themselves should also form by hierarchical merging and hence might also have stellar halos. The main uncertainty is the star formation efficiency in the subhalos that merged to make the dwarfs: star formation in such halos is both less efficient and more stochastic than at Milky Way-like masses (e.g., Garrison-Kimmel et al. 2017). Hence it might be the case that dwarfs do possess stellar halos, but with a lower stellar mass fraction and a high level of scatter among dwarfs.

There is a long history of observational work relevant to stellar halos in dwarfs, even if not phrased in such terms. For example, structures more extended than the main galactic body have been found in many dwarf galaxies. In 1963, Baade found that the young blue population in the nearby dwarf galaxy IC 1613 is embedded in a more extended red population. Defined as the Baade sheet (Sandage, 1971), such extended components were later found in many dwarf galaxies, including WLM (Minniti & Zijlstra, 1996), Phoenix (Martínez-Delgado et al., 1999; Hidalgo et al., 2009), DDO 187 (Aparicio et al., 2000), DDO 190 (Aparicio & Tikhonov, 2000), Leo A (Vansevičius et al., 2004) and NGC 3109 (Hidalgo et al., 2008).

Perhaps the most extensive dataset is for the periphery of Magellanic Clouds, which also reveal extended stellar envelopes (Nidever et al., 2011, 2018). The structure of these outer populations is highly distorted due to the interactions of the Clouds with the Milky Way and with each other. The origin of the well-established extended envelope of the Large Magellanic Cloud is uncertain: it could be due to tidal stripping of the outer disk, or to “classical” accretion of dwarfs. The recent discovery of a substantial population of low-mass dwarfs associated with the Large Magellanic Cloud (Koposov et al., 2015; Drlica-Wagner et al., 2016) strengthens the latter scenario. The Clouds are not the only dwarfs with known satellites: dwarf galaxy companions have been found around various Magellanic analogs (Martínez-Delgado et al. 2012; MADCASH Survey: Carlin et al. 2016). A reasonable expectation is that a subset of these satellites will be tidally destroyed and accreted by their host halos, providing additional motivation to search for accreted stellar halos in dwarf galaxies.

Stellar halos of galaxies are predicted and observed to be of very low surface brightness. This makes it challenging to study their presence quantitatively through diffuse light. Instead, the most tractable way to search for stellar halos is through deep, wide-field imaging now available on a number of large telescopes located at excellent sites.

The isolated Local Group dwarf irregular IC 1613 is a good candidate to search for a stellar halo. It is a gas-rich, low-luminosity galaxy with an absolute magnitude of (McConnachie, 2012), corresponding to a stellar mass of . Its high Galactic latitude implies low foreground extinction, while it is near enough ( kpc; Hatt et al. 2017) that its bright stars are accessible in a reasonable exposure time from the ground. IC 1613 has been continuously forming stars throughout its lifetime, and hosts stars ranging from [Fe/H] –2 to –0.8 (Cole et al., 1999; Skillman et al., 2003; Bernard et al., 2007; Weisz et al., 2014; Skillman et al., 2014). A variety of studies sensitive to different stellar populations at different radii have found that the young stars are more centrally concentrated than the intermediate-age and old stars (Cole et al., 1999; Albert et al., 2000; Borissova et al., 2000; Skillman et al., 2003; Sibbons et al., 2015; McQuinn et al., 2017), though there has been no definitive detection of a stellar halo as distinct from an extension of the primary body of IC 1613.

The aim of this paper is to map IC 1613 with Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam over a wider area and to fainter magnitudes than previous studies, generating the most sensitive map of its outer structure to date.

The paper is organized as follows. The observations and information about how the data was reduced is presented in Section 2. Section 3 describes the method of selecting different stellar tracers from the galaxy and goes on to explain the various analysis done with them. Section 4 compares our results with past works and places this project in a theoretical context. The conclusions are summarized in Section 5.

2 Observations and Data Reduction

IC 1613 was observed on October 2015, with the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC; Miyazaki et al., 2012) on the Subaru Telescope. The large aperture (8.2 m) of the telescope, along with the field-of-view of the HSC, makes it a good fit to study faint resolved stellar populations over the wide-field study of IC 1613. A single field was observed with exposure times of 10 300 s in g (known as “HSC-G” in Subaru parlance) and 10 120 s in i (“HSC-I”), with s exposures taken in each band to recover bright stars that saturate in the long exposures. The seeing varied between and  arcsec. Figure 1 shows the observed field overlaid on a DSS image of IC 1613. At the assumed distance of 725 kpc, our observations extend to a projected distance of 8.4 kpc from the center of the galaxy. Given the half-light radius () of ( 1.01 kpc, Hunter & Elmegreen 2006), these data extend to about 8.3 in projected radius. They also reach a limit of about 4 magnitudes below the tip of the red giant branch, making this the widest and deepest study of IC 1613 to date (see Figures 4 and 7).

Figure 2: Star–galaxy separation: Here we show the ratio of PSF flux to cmodel flux as a function of magnitude (-band on the top panel, -band on the bottom panel). Stars have an expected value of unity. We classify sources within of this value as point sources (black; 165,550 sources), compared to the full set of sources (grey; 580,166 sources), most of which are background galaxies.
Figure 3: Uncertainties as a function of magnitude in both (upper panel) and (lower panel). The 5 point source depths are mag and mag.

The images were processed using a prototype version of the LSST optical imaging data processing pipeline. A fork of the LSST stack was used for HSC data processing (hscPipe, http://hsc.mtk.nao.ac.jp/pipedoc_e/index.html), but the HSC-specific tools have since been merged back into the LSST Stack (Bosch et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2018). For overview information on LSST and its Data Management system, see Ivezić et al. (2008) and Jurić et al. (2015). In brief, bias subtraction, dark current correction and flat-fielding using dome flats were applied to the images, followed by non-linearity, brighter-fatter and cross-talk corrections. The individual short and long exposures were coadded, and photometry was performed on a per-band basis. The stack produces many photometric outputs. As discussed in the next subsection, two are relevant for this paper: forced point spread function (PSF)-fitting photometry (appropriate for stars) and cmodel photometry (a linear combination of exponential and models, appropriate for galaxies). The images were then astrometrically and photometrically calibrated against Pan-STARRS1 Processing Version 2 (Schlafly et al., 2012; Tonry et al., 2012). All the astrometric and photometric measurements presented in this work are thus in the Pan-STARRS1 system. The extinction values for the sources in each band are computed using the dust map from Schlegel et al. (1998) and the extinction coefficients from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011), assuming an extinction to reddening ratio () of 3.1. The mean extinction across the field is .

Figure 4: Spatial distribution of all point sources from the HSC field. The center is marked by the red point as calculated in Section 3.3. The central region is crowded and so few sources are detected, resulting in a nearly empty region. The red circle with a projected radius of 2 kpc (at the distance of IC 1613) provides a sense of scale. Empty spots on the periphery are due to bright foreground stars.

2.1 Star–Galaxy Separation

The resulting catalog has and photometry for an enormous number of sources within the Hyper Suprime-Cam field of view, but only a fraction of these sources are resolved stars associated with IC 1613. Many of the sources, especially toward faint magnitudes, are barely resolved (or unresolved) distant background galaxies. A central challenge in resolved stellar populations is separating the stars of interest from these background galaxies.

As a simple but effective means of star/galaxy separation, we use the ratio of PSF to cmodel flux. True stars scatter around a ratio of unity, while galaxies show fainter PSF fluxes than their true fluxes and so are found at lower values. This statistic has been successfully used for star/galaxy separation with a similar dataset by Carlin et al. (2017).

Figure 2 plots the PSF to cmodel flux ratio as a function of magnitude, showing that stars are well-separated from galaxies at and , but less so at fainter magnitudes. Hence some galaxy contamination is inevitable at the faintest magnitudes. To balance this contamination with a reasonable sample of stars, we classify sources as stars if they are within of the expected stellar flux ratio of unity (where is the per-object uncertainty on the PSF/cmodel flux ratio). There is an asymmetric extension toward at bright () magnitudes. We have confirmed that most of the sources in this feature are RGB stars in the main body of IC 1613, suggesting that the feature is likely due to the elevated background in the crowded inner regions. We also only consider sources detected at or above, corresponding to a depth of and in the uncrowded regions of the image (Figure 3).

Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution of the point sources selected in this manner. A red circle of radius 2 kpc (9.5′) is overplotted on the scatter plot to visually set the scale. The galaxy center, as calculated in Section 3, is also marked. It is clear that crowding affects the photometry in these inner regions of the galaxy where few stars are detected. In the next subsection we discuss artificial star tests to determine the regions in which the photometry is reliable. We also note that several stellar overdensities are apparent in the IC 1613 field (e.g. at RA=15.85 deg, DEC=+2.4 deg). Inspection of the CMDs corresponding to these overdensities do not reveal any obvious stellar population that could be associated with IC 1613 or, for instance, a very faint dwarf galaxy at the distance of IC 1613. A detailed, quantitative search for dwarf galaxies associated with IC 1613 will be presented in a future publication.

Figure 5: Completeness as a function of magnitude obtained from the artificial star tests. The data are more than 80% complete for magnitudes brighter than 26 mag in both and -bands.

2.2 Artificial Star Tests

We used artificial star tests to quantify and correct for the incompleteness in point sources as a function of magnitude and position. Fake stars were added into the processed images using the Synpipe software (Huang et al., 2018). The input catalog contained stars with magnitudes , linearly weighted so that there are  times as many objects at than at , and uniformly distributed between . A total of 2000 artificial stars were inserted per patch (i.e., stars  arcmin). These fake stars were added into images using the measured PSF and noise characteristics of each individual image, and the resulting images were processed in the same way as for the real observations.

Figure 6: Completeness as a function of radius for different magnitude bins (Top: , Bottom: ). The photometry is 80% complete for the positions lying outer to 12 from the center of the galaxy for both the bands.

Figure 5 shows the completeness as a function of magnitude for both g and i bands. Taking bins of 0.5 mag in each filter, the completeness was computed as the number of output fake stars in each bin divided by number of input fake stars in the same bin. The photometry is more than 80% complete for magnitudes brighter than 26 mag in both filters. Due to crowding, completeness also depends on the distance from the galaxy center in magnitude-dependent manner. Completeness as a function of position and magnitude is shown in Figure 6. The data are almost 80% complete for both bands for regions that lie outside from the center of IC 1613. Hence we exclude this region () that is strongly affected by crowding from our analysis.

3 Analysis

3.1 The Color–Magnitude Diagram

Figure 7: Left Panel: Color–magnitude diagram of point sources from (2.5–8.4 kpc) of the center of IC 1613. The magnitudes have been corrected for extinction. The median magnitude and color uncertainties are overplotted on the left panel. The different regions of the color–magnitude diagram: red giant branch, main sequence, red clump, and horizontal branch stars are all clearly visible. The vertical feature brighter than is the Sgr stream. Right Panel: Hess diagram of point sources over the same region.

Figure 7 shows the color–magnitude diagram of point sources within the radial range of (2.5–8.4 kpc) from the center of IC 1613. First we discuss the features not associated with IC 1613: well-measured point sources extend as faint as 27 mag, but a large fraction of the sources fainter than 26 mag are unresolved background galaxies (Figure 2). Excepting the upper giant branch of IC 1613, the majority of the points redder than mag are foreground stars of the Milky Way disk.

There is also a narrow plume of sources that extends upwards from at . This feature appears to be a well-defined main sequence observed at a narrow range in heliocentric distance. We note that IC 1613 is in the same direction as previous detections of tidal debris from the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal (e.g., Koposov et al., 2012). The distance of the Sagittarius point sources along the line of sight to IC 1613 is 25 kpc (Belokurov et al., 2014). Adopting this distance, and ages and metallicities of the Sagittarius stream found in the literature (e.g., Marconi et al., 1998; Bellazzini et al., 1999), we confirmed the observed feature to be consistent with that expected from Sagittarius. Hence, we conclude that this additional feature in the CMD is indeed debris from the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy along the line of sight to IC 1613.

Focusing on IC 1613 itself, several features that can be clearly attributed to specific stellar populations are visible in Figure 7:

  • The red giant branch (RGB), consisting of stars older than 1 Gyr, is the most distinguishing feature in the CMD. It becomes distinct from the blob of unresolved galaxies at . In this same magnitude range, the photometric errors are smaller than the observed width of the RGB; thus the observed thickness must be intrinsic (see Figure 7). This is primarily due to a metallicity spread among the old stellar populations in the galaxy (the expected contribution due to a range of distances along the line of sight is mag and hence negligible).

  • The red clump is another prominent feature in the CMD, located around and . The red clump occurs for intermediate-age to old stellar populations with ages of 1–10 Gyr, though its position varies little with age in this range.

  • The main sequence (MS) is the roughly vertical feature of blue stars at , which consists of young (less than Gyr) stars. While it makes up only a tiny fraction of the identifiable stars in our radial range, its presence does imply recent star formation in the outskirts of IC 1613.

  • The horizontal branch (HB) stars are from ancient stellar populations (age Gyr). The HB—clearly visible in the CMD at – can be separated roughly into two separate features: a red horizontal branch (RHB) extending blueward from the red clump, and the blue horizontal branch (BHB) extending redward from . The apparent gap in the HB is the RR Lyrae instability strip, which is clearly well-populated (see also Cole et al. 1999).

Figure 8: Left Panel: Color–magnitude diagram of point sources within of the center of IC 1613, with overplotted isochrones used for the selection of the tracer stellar populations. The theoretical MIST isochrones for RGB (age = 10 Gyr and [Fe/H] = ) and MS (age = 100 Myr and [Fe/H] = ) are shown in red and dark green colors. In addition, the fiducial ridgeline used for the selection of HB ([Fe/H] = ) is shown in purple. Right Panel: Selection of stellar tracers. The selected RGB, HB, and MS stars are shown in red, purple, and dark green colors, respectively.

We focus our analysis in this paper on three of these tracers – the young MS stars, intermediate-to-old age RGB stars, and old HB stars. The MIST (Dotter, 2016; Choi et al., 2016) isochrones based on ages and metallicities of the populations given in Cole et al. (1999) and Skillman et al. (2003) are overplotted on the CMD at the distance adopted for IC 1613. Red giant branch (age = 10 Gyr, [Fe/H] = –1.5) and main sequence (age = 100 Myr, [Fe/H] = –0.8) isochrones are overplotted on the CMD and provide a good visual match to the observed populations (Figure 8). In addition, a fiducial ridgeline of an old metal poor ([Fe/H] = –1.5) globular cluster (NGC 5272; Bernard et al., 2014) is overplotted on the CMD for the horizontal branch. This ridgeline provides a reasonable fit to the shape of the HB, and is used in our selection method (see Section 3.2) to include the most likely HB stars.

3.2 Selection of Stellar Tracers

The three stellar tracers used in this project—MS, RGB, and HB—trace out young, intermediate to old, and old populations, respectively. The weight of a star’s likelihood of membership in the stellar tracer selection is calculated using its separation from the isochrone and its photometric errors as:

where is the intrinsic width of the IC 1613 stellar locus. For the RGB and MS, is the color of the point source and is the corresponding interpolated point on the isochrone for the same -magnitude. For the HB, is the -magnitude of the point source and is the corresponding interpolated point on the isochrone for the same color. is the combined photometric error of the point source from both of the filters.

The stellar tracers are separated by selecting all the points with weight 0.4. The stars selected for further analysis are shown over-plotted on the CMD in the right panel of Figure 8. Only stars with g brighter than 26 mag are considered. This ensures using high signal-to-noise data (see Figure 3) while also avoiding severe unresolved galaxy contamination at the fainter end (Figure 2).

Figure 9: Surface density profiles for different stellar tracers—RGB (red), HB (purple), and MS (dark green)—in circular bins of width centered on IC 1613. The crowding limits our completeness in the shaded grey area. Thus, we consider only the region to the right of this shaded area () in our analysis.

3.3 Center and Ellipticity of IC 1613

We first focus on determining the overall structure of IC 1613 by finding its center and ellipticity. To calculate the center and ellipticity of IC 1613’s outskirts, we repeatedly draw random samples of 15000 (out of a total 20274) RGB stars with without replacement. The center and ellipticity are taken from the best-fit ellipse for the isodensity contour that is 3 above the background level outside from the center of the galaxy (e.g. Hammel & Sullivan-Molina 2018). By repeating this process for 1000 iterations, we find the coordinates of the center to be J2000 () = (). This is formally offset by about to the north east of the literature center: () = (16.19917, 2.11778), from McConnachie (2012).

Figure 10: Top: Best fit exponential profiles overplotted on the background subtracted surface density profiles of each of the stellar tracers. Bottom: Best fit exponential profiles with added background overplotted on the surface density profiles of each of the stellar tracers. The curves are extrapolated to the central regions and are shown with dotted lines. The lower panel of all the six plots show the fractional residuals left over after the fits. Left: MS star profile with an overplotted single exponential fit. Middle: RGB star profile with an overplotted broken exponential, with a break at . Right: HB star profile with an overplotted broken exponential, with a break at .

By fitting ellipses to different isodensity contour levels, we find that the ellipticity varies minimally from 0.10 at to 0.04 at , compared to a central ellipticity of (McConnachie, 2012). Our results show that the galaxy has a nearly circular morphology in the outer regions. We assume these values for IC 1613’s center and ellipticity for the rest of the paper.

3.4 Radial Profiles of Stellar Tracers

We use surface density profiles to trace out the radial structure of IC 1613 for stars with . The profiles for each of three stellar tracers (MS, RGB and HB) are given in Figure 9. Since the ellipticity is nearly zero, we use circular projected radial bins of width to calculate the profiles. The surface density is corrected for completeness by applying the radial corrections shown in Figure 6.

All profiles reach the background at –24′ ( 5.2 kpc; ), which is much further than typical studies of old populations in dwarf galaxies, owing to our large field of view. The surface brightness that corresponds to these faint regions is mag arcsec (in ), which is calculated at the background surface density level of 0.62 RGB stars per square arc-minute, by assuming a Salpeter IMF (Salpeter, 1955) and a 10 Gyr population with [Fe/H] = .

Stellar Tracer

Inner ()

(Bernard et al., 2007)

Intermediate

()

Outer

()

MS - 13.4
RGB 4.0
HB - 29.9
Table 1: Scale-lengths of exponentials for the three stellar tracers. The inner scale-length is from Bernard et al. (2007). The rest of the columns are from the fits done in this work. denotes the radius of the break between the two exponentials.

The grey area in Figure 9 marks the boundary () beyond which crowding no longer significantly affects our data (see Section 2.2 and Figure 6). Hence, for further analysis, we use only the data points right of the grey area ().

Next we fit functions to the background subtracted radial profiles. The background for each of the stellar tracer is computed as the completeness corrected surface density between and . We focus on single exponential and broken exponential fits to the data, because they have provided good descriptions of dwarf galaxies in the past (Hidalgo et al., 2003; Vansevičius et al., 2004; Hunter & Elmegreen, 2006; Zhang et al., 2012; Herrmann et al., 2013), and experimenting with such fits suggested they would also provide reasonable fits to the IC 1613 data. The functional form for the exponential fit is:

where is the central surface density and is the scale-length, which is defined as the radius at which the density falls by . Sérsic profiles also fit the broken exponential profiles (e.g. Herrmann et al. 2013), but to facilitate comparison with past studies of IC 1613’s inner profile, we focus on (broken) exponentials for our analysis rather than using Sérsic fits.

For all the profiles, we used a non-linear least-squares method for the fits to the data from to . For the MS stars, a broken exponential did not represent an improvement over the single exponential fit, while the more complex models had a significantly lower reduced for the RGB and HB stars.

The best quality fits for all three stellar tracers are list in Table 1 and shown in Figure 10. The bottom panel of the figure shows the surface density profiles after the background is added back. The profiles have been extrapolated in the inner () regions and shown as dotted lines. The lower panels in all the six plots show the fractional residuals left over after the fits.

3.4.1 Opposite Structures for Younger and Older Stellar Populations

As stated above, the RGB and HB stars show clear breaks in their exponential profiles. The break radii ( and , respectively) are consistent, suggesting that they represent the same underlying stellar population. By contrast, the younger MS stars show no break.

Outside of but within the break radii, the scale lengths of the populations increase with age: the density of the young MS stars falls off slightly more steeply than the intermediate-age/old RGB stars and much more steeply than the old HB stars. This is similar to the observations of most dwarf galaxies to date, where the young population is embedded within an older, more extended component (Martínez-Delgado et al., 1999; Aparicio et al., 2000; Aparicio & Tikhonov, 2000; Vansevičius et al., 2004; Hidalgo et al., 2003, 2008, 2009).

This behavior changes in the outer regions beyond the break radii. The young MS stars (well-fit by a single exponential) show the same structure, but the scale lengths of the RGB and HB stars are much smaller than the MS stars, suggesting a transition to a region where their densities fall off more quickly. In detail, the HB profile has a smallest scale length, hinting that the surface density profiles depend monotonically on the age of the population. More detailed interpretation is given in Section 4.

Figure 11: Stellar distribution of RGB (red), HB (purple), and MS (dark green) stars in the four quadrants.
Figure 12: Left: Surface density profiles of MS stars in the four quadrants; Middle: Surface density profiles of RGB stars in the four quadrants; Right: Surface density profiles of HB stars in the four quadrants.

3.5 Comparison To Previous Results

As discussed in Section 1, previous studies of IC 1613 mostly concentrated on the inner regions of the galaxy. Here we focus on comparisons to the results of Bernard et al. (2007), who also studied the structure of different stellar populations.

Bernard et al. (2007) constructed radial profiles up to from the center of IC 1613, and fit exponential functions to populations including MS and RGB stars. For comparison, the scale lengths for these populations are also listed in Table 1.

On comparing these scale-lengths with the values that we obtained from our fits (see Table 1), it is clear that our outer () profiles do not match with their inner () profiles for both RGB and MS stars. This points to a break for both the populations within . Combined with the break that we found for the RGB and HB profiles at , we conclude that the old population of IC 1613 is made of at least three components, with the profile becoming steeper as we move outwards from the center of the galaxy. The young MS population has at least two components, with the outer component shallower than the inner component.

3.6 Summarizing the Structure of Stellar Populations

We list three takeaway points from our investigation of the structure of resolved stellar populations of the dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613. First, the young MS stars are almost as extended as the old RGB and HB stars, even though the density of young stars is comparatively low in the outer regions of the galaxy. Second, the radial surface density distribution of old stars is steeper in the outer regions compared to the inner regions. Third, the radial surface density distribution of young stars is steeper in the inner regions compared to the outer regions: this behavior is opposite to that of the old stars.

We discuss the interpretation of these findings further in Section 4.

3.7 Looking for Evidence of Accretion

The presence of an outer break in the structure of the old stellar populations in IC 1613 suggests the possibility of an “extra” component, which could be identified with an accreted stellar halo.

Another way to search for evidence of accreted material is to search for evidence of asymmetry in the outer surface density profile. As an initial exploration of this idea, we show a map of the stellar tracers (RGB, HB and MS) divided into different quadrants is shown in Figure 11.

In each quadrant, the surface density of different stellar tracers is calculated using the method described in Section 3.4. The resulting surface density profiles of MS, RGB and HB stars are given in the left, middle and right panels of Figure 12, respectively. We do not observe any signs of obvious asymmetry in the four profiles for any of the stellar tracers. Hence we see no evidence, at least from this simple test, for a large-scale asymmetry that could reflect the presence of substantial accretion event(s) in the halo.

4 Discussion

Here we discuss the interpretation of the central observational results of the paper: that each studied stellar tracer (MS, RGB, HB) has a complex, multi-component structure, with the scale length of the younger stars growing at large radii while the scale length of the older stars shrinks in the outer regions of the galaxy. Young stars are present in small but detectable numbers out to at least ′ (4.2 kpc ).

4.1 Scenarios for Extended Stellar Components

There are a number of ideas that have been proposed to explain the extended stellar structures in dwarf galaxies. Akin to the classification for more massive galaxies, it is reasonable to separate these explanations into in situ scenarios in which the extended structures are formed though internal galactic processes, and scenarios in which the halos are built through the hierarchical accretion of less massive galaxies.

Focusing first on the in situ scenarios, there is some evidence from numerical simulations of dwarfs for “outside in” star formation. At early times when the gas supply was high, star formation could occur at larger distances from the center, but as gas is consumed, pressure support decreases and star formation is only viable at smaller radii (Stinson et al., 2009). Scattering in the orbits of old stars and shocks driven by bursts of star formation can also produce more extended distributions of old stars. (Mashchenko et al., 2008; Stinson et al., 2009; Maxwell et al., 2012). Using the FIRE simulations, El-Badry et al. (2016) showed that stellar feedback and bursty star formation can lead to net stellar migration on timescales of a few yr, as well as pushing star-forming gas to larger radii.

Hybrid scenarios where inner old stars are formed in situ, but redistributed to large radii through galactic interactions, might also be plausible. For example, Zolotov et al. (2009) use simulations to show that a portion of the inner stellar halos of Milky Way-mass galaxies were indeed formed near the center of the galaxy and displaced to large radii by major mergers. An alternative model is if, akin to the major mergers thought to have formed some early-type galaxies, a low-mass galaxy was formed through the merger of two lower-mass gas-rich dwarfs. This scenario can lead to a remnant with an extended outer spheroid and an inner star-forming disk (Bekki, 2008).

Finally, we consider the standard scenario in which extended structures are built through the accretion of less massive galaxies, as discussed in detail in the Introduction. Perhaps the most obvious evidence that this process has occurred would be the the detection of clear streams or tidal features in the halo. More subtle evidence could be the presence of structural features in the radial distribution of stars that could be unambiguously identified with accretion. For example, the stellar density profile of the Milky Way follows a broken power law, with a break at 25 kpc (Jurić et al., 2008). This break radius has been interpreted as a pile-up of stars at their orbital apocenters associated with a single massive accretion event (Deason et al., 2013, 2018).

4.2 Comparison to Observations of IC 1613

First considering the young MS stars: the presence of such stars at large projected radii ( kpc; ) in IC 1613 is puzzling considering that the H i column density falls to atoms cm by kpc (Hunter et al., 2012), and at such low densities star formation is unlikely to occur. A recent burst of star formation that pushed gas to larger radii than presently observed could hence explain the presence of young stars at those distances (El-Badry et al., 2016).

Extending this hypothesis to the older stars, a series of such bursts could also have led to the presence of intermediate-age and old stars at large radii. A possible issue with this scenario is that IC 1613 has an almost constant star formation history (Cole et al., 1999; Skillman et al., 2003, 2014) with little or no evidence of distinct bursts. The necessary averaging of the star formation history into bins could smooth out bursts that occurred on timescales  Myr. Nonetheless, it cannot be said that there is specific evidence for the sort of bursts that could have led to large-scale rearrangement of the stellar distribution in IC 1613. Hence this hypothesis seems better-supported for the young stars than for the old stars.

Indeed, the lack of bursts of star formation also presents a problem for any scenario positing a major gas-rich merger, since such a merger is expected to lead to a noticeable elevation in the star formation range (Bekki, 2008).

In principle, the breaks in the radial profiles of intermediate-age and old stars could be consistent with either in situ outside-in formation (e.g., Stinson et al. 2009) or with accretion of smaller galaxies. The occurrence of breaks in both the RGB and HB stars at a common radius of ( = 3.4 ) might be more easily explained in an accretion scenario: accreted galaxies might well have both intermediate-age and old stars that would end up on similar orbits, while similar break radii for a wide range of ages would not seem to be a straightforward prediction of a gradual outside-in formation scenario.

Not all evidence favors the accretion scenario: the lack of evidence for streams or other obvious tidal material is notable. In addition, IC 1613 has no known globular clusters, long considered as luminous tracers of stellar halos (Brodie & Strader, 2006), even at large radii (see, e.g., the Local Group search of di Tullio Zinn & Zinn 2015). We did not find any new globular clusters candidates in our data, though without formal artificial cluster tests (planned for a future paper) we cannot quantify these limits on the presence of clusters.

Overall, we conclude that the extended intermediate-age and old components in IC 1613 have observed properties consistent with those expected for accreted stellar halos, but that in situ scenarios, such as outside-in star formation, could also explain some of the observed properties of these components, and may separately be required to explain the unusually extended young stars in the galaxy.

4.3 Future Work

Detailed numerical simulations could help with the interpretation of this and future, similar data sets. In particular, it would be useful to know whether simulated dwarf galaxies with show evidence for complex radial profiles among their intermediate and older stellar populations, even without a clearly bursty star formation history. This is one example of the need to better understand the relationship between the outer structure of the galaxy and its in situ star formation history. This would better allow one to infer information about the accretion history of the dwarf from the structure of its stellar populations.

On the observational side, spectroscopy of large samples of luminous red giants in the outer regions of IC 1613 would be feasible, and could allow more sensitive searches for evidence of accretion events in phase space than the relatively simple searches in projected physical space that we conducted in this paper.

Looking to future facilities, LSST will extend wide-field observations of dwarf galaxies to comparably faint magnitudes over the entire southern sky. From space, JWST and WFIRST will also provide complementary deep and wide-field images that can resolve stars to large radii and offer superior star/galaxy separation to faint magnitudes, allowing one to construct the full star-formation history of IC 1613 and similar dwarfs over a wider range of radii.

5 Conclusions

Using Hyper-Suprime Cam on the Subaru telescope, we have conducted very wide-field deep optical imaging of the Local Group isolated dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613. By separating the different stellar tracers of MS, RGB and HB stars from the CMD, we constructed their surface density profiles. Due to completeness constraints, we restricted our analysis to the outer regions (), but combined with previous work, we were able to construct profiles over a wider radial range. Our main conclusions are:

  • The stellar density profiles of all the three tracers reach background at (= 5.2 kpc; 5 ), where the surface brightness is as low as 33.7 mag/arcsec (-band).

  • The profiles of RGB and HB stars, representing intermediate-age to old stellar populations, have a complex structure with at least three (RGB) and two (HB) components, respectively. The two populations share a common outer “break” radius of (3.5 kpc = ) beyond which they steeply decline.

  • The young MS stellar profile is composed of two piece-wise components, with the inner component steeper than the outer component. This break radius is interior to but is otherwise not well-determined from our data.

  • The young MS stars almost reach the same extent as the old stars, but the outer surface density of young stars is much lower than the older populations, and the density profile of the young stars flattens in the outskirts of the galaxy, again unlike the old populations. This differing behavior between the younger and older stellar populations suggests they were assembled in different ways.

  • By studying the outer surface density profiles of the stellar tracers in different quadrants, we did not find any obvious (spatial) evidence for non-axisymmetric material representing an obvious accretion event.

While not definitive, the most straightforward interpretation of these observations is that (i) the extended young population formed from gas that was pushed outward from the center as a result of supernova-driven feedback, and (ii) the outermost intermediate-age and old stars have structural properties more consistent with accretion than in situ formation scenarios.

This latter point is tentative pending additional observational and theoretical studies of the relationship between star formation history and the outer structure of older stars in dwarf galaxies. Such work will bear on our understanding of the assembly of all dwarfs.

We acknowledge support from the following NSF grants: AST-1816196 (J.L.C.); AST-1814208 (D.C.); and AST-1813628 (A.H.G.P. and C.T.G.). AJR was supported by National Science Foundation grant AST-1616710, and as a Research Corporation for Science Advancement Cottrell Scholar. JS acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-1514763 and the Packard Foundation. D.J.S. acknowledges support from NSF grants AST1821967, 1821987, 1813708, and 1813466. Research by D.C. is supported by NASA through grants number HST-GO-15426.007-A and HST-GO-HST-GO-15332.004-A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. We are grateful to Paul Price for his invaluable assistance with data reduction using the LSST pipelines. RP thanks Gurtina Besla, Dan Marrone, Don McCarthy, Yumi Choi, Alyson Ford, Robert Lupton, Brenda Namumba, Knut Olsen, D.J. Pisano and Evan Skillman for their helpful comments on this project.

References

  • Albert et al. (2000) Albert, L., Demers, S., & Kunkel, W. E. 2000, AJ, 119, 2780
  • Aparicio & Tikhonov (2000) Aparicio, A., & Tikhonov, N. 2000, AJ, 119, 2183
  • Aparicio et al. (2000) Aparicio, A., Tikhonov, N., & Karachentsev, I. 2000, AJ, 119, 177
  • Bekki (2008) Bekki, K. 2008, ApJ, 680, L29
  • Bellazzini et al. (1999) Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., & Buonanno, R. 1999, MNRAS, 307, 619
  • Belokurov (2013) Belokurov, V. 2013, New A Rev., 57, 100
  • Belokurov et al. (2014) Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., Evans, N. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 116
  • Bernard et al. (2007) Bernard, E. J., Aparicio, A., Gallart, C., Padilla-Torres, C. P., & Panniello, M. 2007, AJ, 134, 1124
  • Bernard et al. (2014) Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Schlafly, E. F., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2999
  • Borissova et al. (2000) Borissova, J., Georgiev, L., Kurtev, R., et al. 2000, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 36, 151
  • Bosch et al. (2018) Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5
  • Brodie & Strader (2006) Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 193
  • Bullock & Johnston (2005) Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931
  • Carlin et al. (2016) Carlin, J. L., Sand, D. J., Price, P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, L5
  • Carlin et al. (2017) Carlin, J. L., Sand, D. J., Muñoz, R. R., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 267
  • Choi et al. (2016) Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102
  • Cole et al. (1999) Cole, A. A., Tolstoy, E., Gallagher, III, J. S., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1657
  • Crnojević et al. (2016) Crnojević, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19
  • Deason et al. (2013) Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., & Johnston, K. V. 2013, ApJ, 763, 113
  • Deason et al. (2018) Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., & Lancaster, L. 2018, ApJ, 862, L1
  • di Tullio Zinn & Zinn (2015) di Tullio Zinn, G., & Zinn, R. 2015, AJ, 149, 139
  • Dotter (2016) Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8
  • Drlica-Wagner et al. (2016) Drlica-Wagner, A., Bechtol, K., Allam, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, L5
  • El-Badry et al. (2016) El-Badry, K., Wetzel, A., Geha, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 131
  • Garrison-Kimmel et al. (2017) Garrison-Kimmel, S., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., & Bardwell, E. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3108
  • Hammel & Sullivan-Molina (2018) Hammel, B., & Sullivan-Molina, N. 2018, Demonstration of Least-squares Fitting of Ellipses, Least-squares Ellipse Fitting, GitHub
  • Hatt et al. (2017) Hatt, D., Beaton, R. L., Freedman, W. L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 146
  • Helmi (2008) Helmi, A. 2008, A&A Rev., 15, 145
  • Herrmann et al. (2013) Herrmann, K. A., Hunter, D. A., & Elmegreen, B. G. 2013, AJ, 146, 104
  • Hidalgo et al. (2008) Hidalgo, S. L., Aparicio, A., & Gallart, C. 2008, AJ, 136, 2332
  • Hidalgo et al. (2009) Hidalgo, S. L., Aparicio, A., Martínez-Delgado, D., & Gallart, C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 704
  • Hidalgo et al. (2003) Hidalgo, S. L., Marín-Franch, A., & Aparicio, A. 2003, AJ, 125, 1247
  • Huang et al. (2018) Huang, S., Leauthaud, A., Murata, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S6
  • Hunter & Elmegreen (2006) Hunter, D. A., & Elmegreen, B. G. 2006, ApJS, 162, 49
  • Hunter et al. (2012) Hunter, D. A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 134
  • Ibata et al. (2014) Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., McConnachie, A. W., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 128
  • Ivezić et al. (2008) Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:0805.2366
  • Jurić et al. (2008) Jurić, M., Ivezić, Ž., Brooks, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 864
  • Jurić et al. (2015) Jurić, M., Kantor, J., Lim, K., et al. 2015, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1512.07914
  • Koposov et al. (2015) Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N. W. 2015, ApJ, 805, 130
  • Koposov et al. (2012) Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 80
  • Marconi et al. (1998) Marconi, G., Buonanno, R., Castellani, M., et al. 1998, A&A, 330, 453
  • Martínez-Delgado et al. (1999) Martínez-Delgado, D., Gallart, C., & Aparicio, A. 1999, AJ, 118, 862
  • Martínez-Delgado et al. (2010) Martínez-Delgado, D., Gabany, R. J., Crawford, K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 962
  • Martínez-Delgado et al. (2012) Martínez-Delgado, D., Romanowsky, A. J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L24
  • Mashchenko et al. (2008) Mashchenko, S., Wadsley, J., & Couchman, H. M. P. 2008, Science, 319, 174
  • Maxwell et al. (2012) Maxwell, A. J., Wadsley, J., Couchman, H. M. P., & Mashchenko, S. 2012, ApJ, 755, L35
  • McConnachie (2012) McConnachie, A. W. 2012, AJ, 144, 4
  • McConnachie et al. (2009) McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 66
  • McQuinn et al. (2017) McQuinn, K. B. W., Boyer, M. L., Mitchell, M. B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 78
  • Minniti & Zijlstra (1996) Minniti, D., & Zijlstra, A. A. 1996, ApJ, 467, L13
  • Miyazaki et al. (2012) Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Nakaya, H., et al. 2012, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, 84460Z
  • Monachesi et al. (2016) Monachesi, A., Bell, E. F., Radburn-Smith, D. J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1419
  • Nidever et al. (2011) Nidever, D. L., Majewski, S. R., Muñoz, R. R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L10
  • Nidever et al. (2018) Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., Choi, Y., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1805.02671
  • Salpeter (1955) Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
  • Sandage (1971) Sandage, A. 1971, ApJ, 166, 13
  • Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103
  • Schlafly et al. (2012) Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., Jurić, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 158
  • Schlegel et al. (1998) Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  • Searle & Zinn (1978) Searle, L., & Zinn, R. 1978, ApJ, 225, 357
  • Shipp et al. (2018) Shipp, N., Drlica-Wagner, A., Balbinot, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 114
  • Sibbons et al. (2015) Sibbons, L. F., Ryan, S. G., Irwin, M., & Napiwotzki, R. 2015, A&A, 573, A84
  • Skillman et al. (2003) Skillman, E. D., Tolstoy, E., Cole, A. A., et al. 2003, ApJ, 596, 253
  • Skillman et al. (2014) Skillman, E. D., Hidalgo, S. L., Weisz, D. R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 44
  • Springel et al. (2006) Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 2006, Nature, 440, 1137
  • Stinson et al. (2009) Stinson, G. S., Dalcanton, J. J., Quinn, T., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1455
  • Tonry et al. (2012) Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 99
  • Vansevičius et al. (2004) Vansevičius, V., Arimoto, N., Hasegawa, T., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, L93
  • Weisz et al. (2014) Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 148
  • White & Rees (1978) White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 341
  • Zhang et al. (2012) Zhang, H.-X., Hunter, D. A., Elmegreen, B. G., Gao, Y., & Schruba, A. 2012, AJ, 143, 47
  • Zolotov et al. (2009) Zolotov, A., Willman, B., Brooks, A. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1058
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
362994
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description