High repetition rate thermionic electron injector concept using higher harmonic cavities
Electron injectors are at the basis of Free-Electron Lasers and Inverse Compton Light Sources. Developing the next-generation injector will allow these accelerator-based light sources to meet the growing science demand for an increase in average brightness. The concept described in this paper combines the reliability and high current density of thermionic cathodes with the beam manipulation capabilities of microwave cavities. This produces a low emittance, high repetition rate electron beam in a compact setup. A custom design kV thermionic gun provides a continuous electron beam, with the current determined by the filament size and temperature. A GHz rectangular cavity deflects the beam across a knife-edge, creating a pulsed beam with a core emittance growth of nm rad. Adding a higher harmonic mode to this cavity results in a flattened magnetic field profile which increases the duty cycle to 30%. Finally, a compression cavity induces a negative longitudinal velocity-time chirp in a bunch, initiating ballistic compression. Adding a higher harmonic mode to this cavity increases the linearity of this chirp and thus decreases the final bunch length before injection into an RF accelerator. Charged particle simulations show that with a mm radius LaB6 filament this method can create fs, pC electron bunches with a transverse rms core emittance of mm mrad at a repetition rate of GHz.
High-brightness x-ray sources are used in a wide range of fields from chemistry, biology and medicine to material sciences, both in science and industry. Since the construction of the first synchrotron light source in 1986, they have provided researchers with an indispensable tool for non-destructive and high spatial resolution inspection of a wide variety of samples. Recently, the X-Ray Free Electron Laser (XFEL) has become available Emma et al. (2010), providing many orders of magnitude higher peak brightness. However, the current-generation sources are mainly limited in their average brightness, typically operating at around 100 light flashes per second. This limitation is mainly due to the electron injectors and linear accelerators that seed the XFEL, which needs to provide high peak current, high quality electron bunches, but have yet to reach a high average current. Next-generation light sources will provide both high peak and high average brightness light Galayda (2014).
With the growing demand for these high-brightness sources as well as the large size of the facilities that house them, spanning hundreds to thousands of meters, there is a desire for robust, compact and affordable x-ray light sources. The main technique proposed to achieve this is in an inverse Compton scattering scheme. This method also requires an electron injector providing high-brightness, high charge, pulsed electron bunches that are subsequently accelerated in a radio-frequency (RF) accelerator. The bunch properties required at the point of electron-light interaction can again be traced back to the properties of the bunches prior to injection into the RF accelerator.
Many avenues of research are being explored for the next-generation electron injector that will supply x-ray light sources with high charge, low emittance and high average current electron bunches. Since 1988, the common approach is to use an RF photoinjector, where a metal or semiconductor cathode is irradiated by a short, intense laser pulse Batchelor et al. (1988). While these sources can achieve the highest brightness, metal cathodes have a relatively low quantum efficiency (QE), i.e. the number of electrons produced per incident photon. Semiconductor materials have a higher QE but in turn, require pressures below mbar and have a limited lifetime of typically 1 to 100 hours, with performance often a trade-off between QE and durability. Advances in cathode development Filippetto et al. (2015); Dowell et al. (2010) and cavity design Musumeci et al. (2018) keep pushing these boundaries, with the APEX VHF-Gun a prime example Sannibale et al. (2012). Future advances may include superconducting RF photoinjectors, capable of achieving even higher field gradients Vogel et al. (2018). Alternatively, Cornell’s DC photogun can deliver electron bunches with a bunch charge of pC and an emittance of mm mrad at a MHz repetition rate or pC with an emittance of mm mrad at GHz Bartnik et al. (2015); Gulliford et al. (2013).
Before photoinjectors became the standard, thermionic emission based guns were the default. Thermionic emission operates by heating the cathode so the thermal energy can overcome the work function, essentially boiling off electrons from the cathode surface. The achievable beam current and emittance therefore heavily depend on the cathode material. While this method is much less complex than a photoinjector, being able to operate in much relaxed vacuum conditions of to mbar and having thousands of hours of lifetime, common thermionic cathode materials such as tungsten or tantalum do not provide sufficient current density at a low enough emittance Jenkins (1969). However, with today’s dispenser cathodes, as well as CeB6 and LaB6 crystals, ever lower work functions are reached. Researchers at SACLA have shown that a DC electron gun with a thermionic cathode can be successfully used as an injector for an XFEL Togawa et al. (2007). Thermionic cathodes in principle provide continuous electron beams, while acceleration to energies > MeV requires RF accelerators and thus a pulsed beam. At SACLA the method used is a beam chopper that can pick out a ns pulse at a Hz repetition rate. Another method often employed is through a gridded cathode, where a small grid in front of the cathode set at a potential at or higher than at the cathode. This way the amount of current reaching the anode can be regulated. The major downside of this method is the significant increase in beam emittance due to the presence of the grid. Thermionic cathodes are also used as the emitter in RF guns. Here the gating is provided by the oscillating electric field, but this also induces increased energy spreads, as well as back-bombardment which results in cathode deterioration.
In short, a next-generation injector should be capable of providing up to tens or hundreds of pC per few-ps bunch at repetition rates exceeding MHz to an RF accelerator such as a booster linac. Concurrently, the transverse emittance of each bunch has to be in the tens to a few hundred nm rad, depending on the charge. The general trend towards advancing these injectors is to develop increasingly complicated setups. DC setups typically operate at kV voltages, while some attempt to move towards the kV, increasing both the complexity and size of the gun Togawa et al. (2004); Dunham et al. (2013). The addition of cryogenic or superconducting RF cavities for higher field gradients as well as more advanced cathode materials, while greatly beneficial to beam quality, incurs increasing costs, both financially and with respect to reliability, complexity and compactness.
In this paper, we present a novel approach to high-brightness, high repetition rate injectors based on thermionic emission and beam manipulation using RF cavities, as is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. The injector, consisting of three separate stages, will first generate a continuous electron beam. Next, an RF deflection cavity containing a fundamental and higher harmonic mode will chop the beam into separate bunches. Finally, an RF bunching cavity, also running on two modes, will compress the bunch so that it can be injected into a booster linac capable of increasing the beam energy to > MeV. This injection occurs at the point of maximum compression, hereafter called the Point of Injection (PoI).
The first stage is the electron gun: a thermionic emitter, either a LaB6 or CeB6 crystal housed in a custom designed kV DC accelerator, generating a high average current continuous electron beam which is subsequently accelerated in the positive -direction. With current technology these emitter crystals can be manufactured with an increasingly lower work function, resulting in a higher quality beam. Furthermore, these crystals can operate in a background pressure as high as mbar while being capable of operating for thousands of hours, creating both a simple and robust system. Operating at kV instead of the more common kV reduces the requirement of high voltage insulation, leading to a smaller HV source and a smaller gun. The design of the gun is shown in Fig. 2. Construction of the gun is presently being completed and initial testing can begin soon.
In order to inject this beam into a booster linac, it has to satisfy certain entry conditions. First and foremost the beam should be pulsed with a maximum root-mean-square (rms) pulse duration of typically to radians of the booster linac RF phase Vretenar (2013). In the second part of the injector, the continuous beam is chopped into bunches by deflecting the beam onto a knife-edge using the on-axis transverse magnetic field of an RF deflection cavity. It has been shown that this chopping can be done without loss of beam quality Lassise et al. (2012). However, the low duty cycle of this process defeats the purpose of using a continuous, high current density emitter. We will show that the addition of a second harmonic mode into the chopping cavity can increase the duty cycle to up to radians phase angle of the fundamental mode, i.e. a 30% duty cycle.
This increased duty cycle means the bunch is now too long to be injected into the booster linac. It is therefore required to compress the bunches by a factor of at least , with the booster linac frequency and the chopping cavity fundamental mode frequency. The third part of the injector will use velocity bunching to achieve this compression. By inducing a linear correlation between the longitudinal velocity and time, i.e. a negative - chirp, the front of the bunch will overtake the rear, ballistically compressing the bunch over a drift space. In order to achieve this, we will use the on-axis longitudinal electric field of an RF bunching cavity. This method assumes that the change in electric field over time will be approximately linear. Near the zero-crossing of the field, this is certainly the case. Yet due to the increased duty cycle of the chopping process, the bunch will encounter distinctly non-linear parts of the field, resulting in insufficient acceleration and deceleration of respectively the front and rear end of the bunch as compared to the bunch center. This aberration decreases the compression ratio such that the bunches will be too long to enter the booster linac. The addition of a second harmonic mode into the cavity can account for these non-linearities, achieving sub-ps pulse lengths at the PoI. With this, the thermionic-based injector can deliver ultra-short, high quality, picocoulomb charge bunches at GHz repetition rates.
The second part of this paper (Sec. II) will describe the process of thermionic emission, leading to the design of the cathode and anode. In order to achieve tens of pC per bunch, the emission current is in the order of mA. At kV, this will require an HV generator capable of delivering a few tens of kW, combined with a beam block capable of dissipating it. In the first experiments, the gun will be operated at a power of kW where a mm radius emitter will deliver a mA average emission current to create a low emittance continuous beam. We will show that with some adjustments, higher currents are achievable in the same setup.
Sec. III details the process of beam chopping, showing how a second harmonic theoretically improves the chopping efficiency. Charged particle tracking simulations are used for further optimization, demonstrating the increased effectiveness of the cavity operating at both the fundamental and second harmonic mode.
Sec. IV describes the compression of the chopped beam, including a similar derivation for the higher harmonic mode. Simulation results will compare the bunch parameters with and without the addition of the second harmonic as well as the final parameters at the exit of the injector, showing that mm mrad core emittance Miltchev (2005), fs, pC bunches at a GHz repetition rate can be achieved. Finally, a feasibility study will investigate the attainability of these higher harmonic cavities.
Ii Thermionic Gun
ii.1 Thermionic emission
In thermionic emission the current density achieved by the emitter is described by the modified Richardson equation Dushman (1923)
with a material constant called the Richardson constant, the crystal temperature, the Boltzmann constant, the work function of the material and the effective lowering of the work function due to the Schottky effect, given by Orloff (2009)
Here, is the electron charge, the electric field at the cathode and the vacuum permittivity. For LaB6 the Richardson constant is A cm K, while work functions are reported between and Lafferty (1951); Pelletier and Pomot (1979).
With the purpose of injecting the electrons into an accelerator-based light source, beam quality is a crucial aspect. In general, this quality is represented by the transverse normalized rms emittance Floettmann (2003)
with the Lorentz factor, the velocity normalized to the speed of light , the transverse position and the divergence in the paraxial approximation given by . At the cathode, the electrons are still being accelerated and this approximation is not yet valid. Instead, the initial emittance for a circular and uniform thermionic emitter can be calculated as the thermal emittance
with the crystal radius and the electron rest mass. From Eqs. (1) and (4) follows that, for a given current, a smaller radius with a higher temperature results in the highest beam quality. The lifetime of the emitter, however, is adversely affected by higher temperatures. For LaB6, limiting the temperature to below ensures a few thousands of operation hours; higher temperatures result in quickly decreasing lifetimes. Even if higher temperatures were possible, the current density cannot be arbitrarily increased. The limit is described by the Child-Langmuir law which states that as the current density increases, the electric field on the cathode caused by the space charge of the electrons will counteract the electric field of the DC accelerating structure. Current densities close to this limit are thus called space-charge limited. When operating in this regime, the electrons that escape the cathode are only accelerated slowly due to the smaller net electric field. This gives space-charge effects more time to influence the beam which may cause a significant growth in transverse emittance. This regime should therefore be avoided. For an infinite area cathode emitting electrons with zero velocity towards a parallel infinite area anode, the Child-Langmuir law is determined as Child (1911)
with and the electric potential and the distance between the cathode and anode respectively. In real electron sources, the cathode surface is small compared to the distance between cathode and anode, requiring the Child-Langmuir law to be multiplied by a factor depending on the ratio Togawa et al. (2007). Limiting the cathode temperature to K and taking a crystal radius of mm results in a thermal emittance of only mm mrad. With a current of mA and a chopping duty cycle of 30%, a charge per bunch of pC at a repetition rate of GHz is achievable. From Eqs. (1) and (2) then follows that an electric field strength of approximately MVm is required to reach this current. At an electric potential of kV, a gap of mm and the correction factor , the adjusted Child-Langmuir limit is approximately mA. This is well above the intended operating current of mA. Therefore the electron source is not operating in the space-charge limited region.
ii.2 Gun Design
In order to achieve an electric field of MVm at the emitter surface in a DC setup without breakdown, the custom cathode-anode assembly shown in Fig. 2 has been designed. The geometry is optimized so that the electric field strength near the crystal is maximized, while simultaneously minimizing the increase everywhere else, as is shown in Fig. 3. The principal way this is done is by raising the cathode towards the anode hole while tapering the anode. This ensures minimal distance between the emitter and anode hole, while not decreasing the distance between cathode and anode, thus keeping the peak electric field strength low. Electrostatic simulations using cst studio suite CST () show that when MVm at the emitter is reached, the peak field strength is approximately MVm, near the edge of the emitter. This edge is a graphite ring with rounded edges that ensures no emission occurs on the side of the crystal. By making this graphite ring as large as mm across, the difference in the electric field strength between the crystal edge and center will be minimal. The size of the graphite ring, however, is currently limited by manufacturing restrictions and is set at mm across. With a field strength of MVm, electron emission from the graphite will be over four orders of magnitude smaller than that of the crystal. Moreover, if an electrical breakdown should occur here, it shall be part of the thermionic current. This will only result in a temporary emitter current fluctuation and will not damage the accelerator structure.
After the electrons have been liberated from the crystal surface they first have to pick up speed and therefore spend a relatively large amount of time near the cathode. As the space charge forces rapidly expand the beam, the outer electrons will sample the off-axis non-linear fields, causing significant emittance growth. In order to counteract this, a magnetic solenoid lens is placed directly behind the anode to control the transverse beam size. However, the solenoid has a residual longitudinal magnetic field at the cathode, causing emittance growth in the beam due to an asymmetry between the azimuthal entrance and exit kick. This magnetic emittance growth is given by Palmer et al. (1997)
Since this emittance growth scales with , combined with the small size of the emitter as well as careful placement and tuning of the solenoid, the contribution of this effect will be an increase in emittance of about 5.7%.
ii.3 High current operation
As Section III will show, a mA continuous electron beam sent through the GHz chopping cavity will result in a charge of pC per bunch. Since the 30% duty cycle of this process cannot be arbitrarily increased, higher bunch charges can only be reached by increasing the current. However, the current density from Eq. (1) has already been maximized: and are determined by the emitter material, is limited by the peak electric field in the gun and cannot be increased without severely affecting the lifetime of the filament. As such, the only method of increasing current is to increase the emitter radius. Several things have to be taken into account for this greater radius.
First, the charge per bunch will increase quadratically with the emitter size, while the thermal emittance will increase linearly. For example, going from mm to mm will increase to pC and the thermal emittance to mm mrad, which is within the acceptable range for FEL operation Lessner et al. (2016). The new radius also changes the multiplication factor for Eq. (5) from to . Recalculating the currents from Eqs. (1) and (5) comes to an emitted current of mA, while the limit lies at A. meaning the emission current is still over ten times smaller than the space-charge limited current.
Second is the radial component of the DC accelerator field near the emitter. The graphite ring surrounding the crystal is not only used to prevent emission from the side of the crystal but also decreases the radial component of the electric field near the crystal. It is therefore important that the emitter crystal has sufficient distance to the emitter edge so that only the longitudinal fields are probed by the electrons.
Thirdly, the increased radius means the emittance contribution of the solenoid increases as well. Care has to be taken that this does not have too great an impact on the final bunch emittance. If necessary, a bucking coil could be introduced into the system.
Finally, the increased beam width means slight deviations in both beam chopping and compression. While this might be beneficial for the charge per bunch, it comes at a cost of an increased emittance and a decreased compression ratio. Additional focusing or changing the chopping cavity parameters can provide sufficient compensation for this, however.
All things considered, scaling towards higher currents mainly involves changing peripheral devices, such as an HV power supply capable of delivering kW and a beam block capable of dissipating that power. Once high current operation is achieved, switching between high and low currents involves little more than switching to a new filament.
Iii Beam chopping
iii.1 RF cavity theory
The second part of the proposed setup is to chop the continuous beam of electrons into bunches with minimal loss of beam current, while maintaining beam quality.
Chopping an electron beam can be done using RF cavities with an on-axis transverse magnetic field, as illustrated in Fig. 4(a). The time-dependent transverse magnetic field deflects the beam periodically, after which an aperture blocks parts of the continuous beam, creating a train of ultra-short electron bunches Lassise (2012). While this method does maintain beam quality, the downside is the limited duty cycle. Losing typically % of the beam current on the aperture, a far greater initial current is required to achieve a decent charge per bunch.
In order to avoid this, the duty cycle can be increased by adding a higher harmonic mode to the cavity and choosing a different RF phase range in which electrons will pass the aperture. In the initial method that phase range is near the zero-crossing of the field. By adding a constant magnetic field, the electrons that pass the aperture are those that experienced the peak of the sinusoidal field. A higher harmonic mode can then be used to flatten that peak, as shown in Fig. 4(b). Since chopping now only occurs on the top part of the beam, the aperture is replaced by a knife-edge.
Because the standing wave in an ideal cylindrical cavity is dependent on a Bessel function in the radial direction, a higher order mode is not an integer multiple of the fundamental frequency. This means a cylindrical cavity is inherently unfit for higher harmonic operation, increasing the difficulty of design. However, the magnetic fields in a rectangular vacuum cavity operating in the TMklm mode are described by sinusoidal functions of position
with , and the number of anti-nodes and , and the cavity dimensions in respectively the x-, y-, and z-direction and the magnetic field amplitude. The propagation of the electrons is in the positive z-direction. This sinusoidal behavior means that with the correct cavity dimensions higher harmonics are possible.
In order to determine which mode has to be added, we will look at the resulting time-dependent magnetic field along the -axis. To achieve the greatest duty cycle without loss of beam quality, the magnetic field experienced by the electrons should remain constant for as long as possible. The ideal would be a rectangular wave. Approximating a rectangular wave with its Fourier series, however, requires many modes to reach suitable flatness. For experimental feasibility, we will only include two modes in the cavity.
With even, odd and , the on-axis magnetic field of Eq. (7) for the first and the -th order mode simplifies to
with , the amplitude scaling between the two modes and the phase of the -th harmonic. To achieve a flat-top magnetic field profile around time , all derivatives for , with as large as possible, so that
with some constant. The higher is, the larger has to be in order for the field to deviate significantly from its value at . Since , and can be controlled freely, the first three derivatives can be set to zero, resulting in
In order to determine the optimal , the fourth derivative at should be close to zero:
Since integer , the smallest absolute value is obtained for , which means a second harmonic should be added to the cavity. Note that this is distinctly different from a square wave where the added term would be a third harmonic.
A suitable combination of field modes for chopping is the TM210 and TM230 mode, of which the on-axis time-dependent magnetic field is shown in Fig. 5. In order for the latter mode to be the second harmonic of the first, the cavity dimensions must satisfy the relation
with the resonance frequency given by
resulting in a ratio of
For a fundamental frequency of GHz the dimensions then are: mm, mm. The length of the cavity in the z-direction can still be chosen freely, as long as it does not cause other modes to be excited at or close to the fundamental or second harmonic frequency.
The fundamental frequency of GHz has been chosen for several reasons. With the higher order modes, the used frequencies are and . In the to GHz range the RF equipment is readily available. With a higher fundamental frequency, such as GHz, the required equipment is both more expensive and difficult to obtain. A lower frequency implies a lower repetition rate of the electron bunches, but also a proportional increase in charge per bunch. The downside of going to frequencies below GHz is the size of the cavities, which will exceed m at MHz, increasing both the size of the setup and the power required to drive the cavities.
By optimizing the power in the two modes it is possible to reach a duty cycle of approximately 30%, leading to pC bunches at a bunch duration of ps rms, which will be shown in the following section.
iii.2 Beam chopping simulations
The entire beamline has been simulated using General Particle Tracer (gpt) GPT (). Since gpt can only simulate charged particle bunches, the continuous beam was simulated by using a ns long macro-bunch. This ensures that a large enough fraction of this macro-bunch is not influenced by space charge effects due to the presence of a front and back end. This fraction, effectively coming from a continuous beam, is the part that will eventually pass the chopping knife-edge.
Using the electric field distribution shown in Fig. 3 as the accelerator field, a mA electron beam is generated at and with a radius of mm at a normalized emittance of mm mrad. The keV continuous electron beam passes through the first magnetic solenoid, which has a residual field on the cathode of approximately mT. Using Eqs. (4) and (6), the total initial emittance is given by
The electron beam then enters the chopping cavity at m, which is modeled as a field expansion of the on-axis magnetic fields of the appropriate modes, with the magnetic field oriented in the transverse y-direction. The fundamental and second harmonic chopping modes are set at and GHz respectively, with separate control over the RF phases and amplitudes. Also added is a constant magnetic field in the y-direction, with a field strength equal to the difference in amplitude of the two chopping modes. This ensures that the direction of propagation is not changed during the chopping of the beam, as is shown in Fig. 4(b).
The amplitude of the fundamental mode is set at , with the second harmonic at . Note that this relative amplitude of the second harmonic does not agree with the in Eq. (10). This is because the electrons are influenced by the integral of the field over their transit time through the cavity. This integration smooths out the field so that a higher relative strength can be used to increase the charge per pulse. After passing the knife-edge at m, the electron beam now consists of bunches at a repetition rate of GHz. Since the chopping field is in the y-direction, the bunch oscillates and is chopped in the x-direction, as shown in Fig. 6(a). The grey particles indicate the electrons that hit the knife-edge, choosing the cut-off point so that there are no protrusions at the front and back of the bunch. The top of the bunch shows a small indent, which is caused by the aforementioned increased relative amplitude. Fig. 6(b) shows the same bunch, but since no chopping occurs in the y-direction the bunch shape will remain rectangular.
Iv Pulsed beam compression
In order to further accelerate the electrons, the bunches have to satisfy the booster entrance conditions. Taking a GHz X-band linac, the rms pulse length at the PoI has to be smaller than ps and preferably below ps. Like the cavity used for chopping, a rectangular RF cavity can be used for compression. With an on-axis longitudinal electric field and no on-axis magnetic field, electrons passing through this cavity will ideally experience a force solely in the propagation direction, causing them to be accelerated or decelerated. The amount of acceleration is determined by the integral of the electric field experienced and therefore depends upon the RF phase. Due to the time-dependent field, different parts of an electron bunch will thus experience different amounts of acceleration. By setting the RF phase correctly the electron bunch will travel through the cavity when the electric field goes through its zero-crossing. The electrons at the front of the bunch will then be decelerated while those at the rear will be accelerated, initiating a ballistic compression. This method of compression uses the fact that the electric field around the zero-crossing is approximately linear. For electron bunches at 30% the length of one RF cycle this approximation is no longer valid. To allow longer bunch lengths to be compressed a higher harmonic mode can be used in order to shape the waveform. To achieve optimal compression, the resulting velocity distribution of the electrons should be linearly increasing from front to rear. Taking a similar approach as with the chopping cavity, the Taylor series of the field around should thus be of the form
with . This means setting the zeroth, second and third derivative to zero. Doing so will also set the fourth derivative to zero, so is used to minimize the fifth derivative, leading to
which is schematically illustrated in Fig. 7. In general, the modes suitable for compression are the TM2+1,2+1,0 modes with and non-negative integers. The fundamental mode at frequency is TM110, where the ratio of dimensions for the double frequency mode can be determined similar to the chopping cavity using Eqs. (12) and (13), resulting in
for the TM110 and TM310 mode. For a GHz cavity, mm and mm.
iv.1 Bunch compression simulations
After the chopping cavity and knife-edge, the bunches drift towards a magnetic solenoid that controls the beam radius, after which it finally enters the RF compression cavity at m. Here, the GHz and GHz mode initiate the bunch compression. In the absence of space charge effects, a perfectly linear relationship between and would result in a minimal compressed pulse length, directly related to the energy spread of the bunch prior to compression. Fig. 8 shows that adding a second harmonic to the cavity significantly increases the linearity of this relationship. As with the chopping cavity, the optimal mode parameters are different from their theoretical value, as they can somewhat account for non-linearities in the bunch, such as the initial energy spread and space-charge effects. Using gpt for optimization, the mode parameters are instead of the theoretical , with .
As shown in Fig. 10, after drifting for about the electron bunches will pass through the point of maximum compression. Comparing this result with that of the optimal compression using only the first harmonic shows a significant decrease in rms pulse length, creating pC bunches as short as fs at a GHz repetition rate. Fig. 10 also shows a slightly longer focal length for the higher harmonic compression cavity. As the second harmonic is in anti-phase to the first harmonic, the effective electric field is weaker than without the second harmonic, causing the difference. This is also visible in Fig. 8, where the slope in the longitudinal phase space is slightly lower for the higher harmonic compression.
The emittance from Eq. (3) can be used to compare the bunch quality during compression. However, since the chopped bunch was part of the top of a modified sine wave, it is asymmetrically shaped. Added to this is that the range of RF phases that will allow electrons to pass the knife-edge is changed, depending on how the knife-edge is positioned. If a greater range is allowed, the bunch in Fig. 6(a) will be more banana-shaped, with the front and rear of the bunch extending further in the negative x-direction, as depicted by the grey particles. These parts have a significant effect on the emittance, even though in x-ray generation schemes the interaction mostly happens with the core of the phase space region Miltchev (2005). A better figure of merit is the 90% core emittance , which entails removing the outermost 10% of the 4D transverse phase space prior to the calculation of the emittance. Furthermore, beamline elements such as a magnetic solenoid introduce large correlations between the transverse positions and velocities of the electrons, causing a large but temporary emittance growth. By looking at the radial emittance
the contributions to this growth can be reduced.
Fig. 10 shows the core x-, y- and r-emittances after going through the compression cavity at . At position it becomes clear that the emittance has slightly increased to . Comparing this to the non-core emittance of shows that the majority of emittance growth is due to the outer 10% of the phase space.
Comparing Figs. 10 and 10 shows a significant increase in transverse emittance around the longitudinal focal point. This is due to space-charge effects that start to dominate the short electron bunch, but this increase can be reduced by decreasing the amount of compression, decreasing the charge per pulse or, in a limited way, by increasing the transverse bunch size. In short, at the PoI the thermionic injector provides electron bunches with a transverse core rms emittance at a GHz repetition rate.
iv.2 Cavity Feasibility
As mentioned in Section III.1., since the chopping and the compression cavity both operate at the fundamental and the second harmonic mode, a rectangular cavity is preferred. Research into power efficient RF cavity design, however, has mainly been done for pillbox cavities Verhoeven et al. (2018). This is accomplished either through modifying the geometry of the cavity or through the introduction of dielectric material into the cavity, where the cylindrical symmetry somewhat simplifies the design process. For a rectangular cavity, such options have not yet been explored, as far as we know.
cst studio simulations show that for a regular rectangular copper compression cavity, the total power required to drive both the fundamental and second harmonic mode to the field amplitudes used in this paper is approximately W. For the chopper cavity, W is required to reach a peak field of mT. While lower than the mT used previously, careful positioning of the knife-edge can make up for this, resulting in a negligible change in the final emittance and bunch length. No optimization has been performed on these geometries, leading to these moderately high powers. Still, CW solid-state amplifiers are commercially available in this power and frequency range and should pose no problem.
With the need for a next-generation high-repetition-rate, high-brightness electron injector, we have presented a design for a keV pulsed electron injector based on the chopping and compression of a continuous beam from a LaB6 cathode. As the injector is split into three distinct parts, going to a high emission current involves little more than the switching of a filament and some realignment, given that the peripheral devices can handle the increased current.
The use of an RF cavity for beam chopping allows the injector to reach GHz repetition rates without severe degradation of beam quality. Adding a higher harmonic mode, the duty cycle of this process is greatly increased, reaching a high charge per bunch relative to the initial current, resulting in fs, mm mrad, pC charge electron bunches at GHz. With both the high repetition rate and an increased bunch length, compression to the length required for injection into a booster linac can be achieved with an RF compression cavity whose compression fields have been linearized by adding a higher harmonic mode. Altogether, the thermionic injector is a compact setup capable of producing an electron beam at a wide range of currents, with a fast chopping process designed to retain as much charge as possible and a compression process designed to match the chopping cavity, all the while keeping beam emittance low. Once proof of principle is given, the setup can be upgraded to higher average currents in order to provide the charge, quality and repetition rate required for several applications, such as XFEL operation.
Currently, the construction of the first stage of the injector, the gun, has almost completed. Initial experiments will demonstrate the achievable beam current and transverse emittance, as well as the lifetime of the emitter.
Acknowledgements.The authors would like to thank Eddy Rietman and Harry van Doorn for their invaluable technical support in the mechanical and electrical design of the thermionic gun. This research is part of the High Tech Systems and Materials programme of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO-AES) and is supported by ASML.
- Emma et al. (2010) P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, et al., First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature Photonics 4, 641 EP (2010), article.
- Galayda (2014) J. Galayda, The Linac Coherent Light Source-II Project, in Proc. 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’14), Dresden, Germany, June 15-20, 2014, International Particle Accelerator Conference No. 5 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014) pp. 935–937, https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2014-TUOCA01.
- Batchelor et al. (1988) K. Batchelor, H. Kirk, J. Sheehan, M. Woodle, and K. McDonald, Development of a High Brightness Electron Gun for the Accelerator Test Facility at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Particle accelerator. Proceedings, 1st EPAC Conference, Rome, Italy, June 7-11, 1988. Vol. 1, 2, Conf. Proc. C880607, 954 (1988).
- Filippetto et al. (2015) D. Filippetto, H. Qian, and F. Sannibale, Cesium telluride cathodes for the next generation of high-average current high-brightness photoinjectors, Applied Physics Letters 107, 042104 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927700 .
- Dowell et al. (2010) D. Dowell, I. Bazarov, B. Dunham, K. Harkay, C. Hernandez-Garcia, R. Legg, H. Padmore, T. Rao, J. Smedley, and W. Wan, Cathode R&D for future light sources, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 622, 685 (2010).
- Musumeci et al. (2018) P. Musumeci, J. G. Navarro, J. Rosenzweig, L. Cultrera, I. Bazarov, J. Maxson, S. Karkare, and H. Padmore, Advances in bright electron sources, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 907, 209 (2018), advances in Instrumentation and Experimental Methods (Special Issue in Honour of Kai Siegbahn).
- Sannibale et al. (2012) F. Sannibale, D. Filippetto, C. F. Papadopoulos, J. Staples, R. Wells, B. Bailey, K. Baptiste, J. Corlett, C. Cork, D. Santis, et al., Advanced photoinjector experiment photogun commissioning results, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 103501 (2012).
- Vogel et al. (2018) E. Vogel et al., SRF Gun Development at DESY, in Proceedings, 29th International Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC18): Beijing, China, September 16-21, 2018 (2018) p. MOPO037.
- Bartnik et al. (2015) A. Bartnik, C. Gulliford, I. Bazarov, L. Cultera, and B. Dunham, Operational experience with nanocoulomb bunch charges in the Cornell photoinjector, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 083401 (2015).
- Gulliford et al. (2013) C. Gulliford, A. Bartnik, I. Bazarov, L. Cultrera, J. Dobbins, B. Dunham, F. Gonzalez, S. Karkare, H. Lee, H. Li, et al., Demonstration of low emittance in the Cornell energy recovery linac injector prototype, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 073401 (2013).
- Jenkins (1969) R. Jenkins, A review of thermionic cathodes, Vacuum 19, 353 (1969).
- Togawa et al. (2007) K. Togawa, T. Shintake, T. Inagaki, K. Onoe, T. Tanaka, H. Baba, and H. Matsumoto, electron gun for low-emittance injector, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 020703 (2007).
- Togawa et al. (2004) K. Togawa, H. Baba, K. Onoe, T. Inagaki, T. Shintake, and H. Matsumoto, CeB electron gun for the soft X-ray FEL project at SPring-8, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 528, 312 (2004), proceedings of the 25th International Free Electron Laser Conference, and the 10th FEL Users Workshop.
- Dunham et al. (2013) B. Dunham, J. Barley, A. Bartnik, I. Bazarov, L. Cultrera, J. Dobbins, G. Hoffstaetter, B. Johnson, R. Kaplan, S. Karkare, et al., Record high-average current from a high-brightness photoinjector, Applied Physics Letters 102, 034105 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789395 .
- Vretenar (2013) M. Vretenar, Linear accelerators, arXiv e-prints (2013), arXiv:1303.6766 [physics.acc-ph] .
- Lassise et al. (2012) A. Lassise, P. Mutsaers, and O. Luiten, Compact, low power radio frequency cavity for femtosecond electron microscopy, Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 1 (2012).
- Miltchev (2005) V. Miltchev, Modelling the transverse phase space and core emittance studies at pitz, in 27th International Conference on Free Electron Lasers, edited by J. Galayda and I. Lindau (Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2005) pp. 556–559.
- Dushman (1923) S. Dushman, Electron Emission from Metals as a Function of Temperature, Phys. Rev. 21, 623 (1923).
- Orloff (2009) J. Orloff, Handbook of charged particle optics (CRC press, 2009).
- Lafferty (1951) J. M. Lafferty, Boride cathodes, Journal of Applied Physics 22, 299 (1951), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699946 .
- Pelletier and Pomot (1979) J. Pelletier and C. Pomot, Work function of sintered lanthanum hexaboride, Applied Physics Letters 34, 249 (1979), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.90769 .
- Floettmann (2003) K. Floettmann, Some basic features of the beam emittance, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 034202 (2003).
- Child (1911) C. D. Child, Discharge From Hot CaO, Phys. Rev. (Series I) 32, 492 (1911).
- (24) https://www.cst.com.
- Palmer et al. (1997) D. T. Palmer, X. J. Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, R. H. Miller, and J. Skaritka, Experimental results of a single emittance compensation solenoidal magnet, 17th IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 97): Accelerator Science, Technology and Applications Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, May 12-16, 1997, Conf. Proc. C970512, 2843 (1997).
- Lessner et al. (2016) E. Lessner, X. Wang, and P. Musumeci, Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on the Future of Electron Sources, Tech. Rep. (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2016).
- Lassise (2012) A. Lassise, Miniaturized RF technology for femtosecond electron microscopy, Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2012).
- (28) http://www.pulsar.nl/gpt.
- Verhoeven et al. (2018) W. Verhoeven, J. F. M. van Rens, A. H. Kemper, E. H. Rietman, H. A. van Doorn, I. Koole, E. R. Kieft, P. H. A. Mutsaers, and O. J. Luiten, Design and characterization of dielectric filled TM microwave cavities for ultrafast electron microscopy (2018), arXiv:1811.02243 .