High-Order Harmonic Generation and Molecular Orbital Tomography: Characteristics of Molecular Recollision Electronic Wave Packets
Abstract
We investigate the orientation dependence of molecular high-order harmonic generation (HHG) both numerically and analytically. We show that the molecular recollision electronic wave packets (REWPs) in the HHG are closely related to the ionization potential as well as the particular orbital from which it ionized. As a result, the spectral amplitude of the molecular REWP can be significantly different from its reference atom (i.e., with the same ionization potential as the molecule under study) in some energy regions due to the interference between the atomic cores of the molecules. This finding is important for molecular orbital tomography using HHG[Nature 432, 867(2004)].
pacs:
42.65.Ky, 32.80.RmThe orientation dependence of molecular high-order harmonic generation (HHG) in strong laser fields constantly attracts attention in both experiment and theoryVelotta ; J. Itatani ; X. X. Zhou ; C. B. Madsen ; lein1 ; Bandrauk ; Tsuneto ; vozzi . A new surge was brought on by the recent emergence of its important application in molecular orbital tomography. Itatani showed that through calibrating the recollision electronic wave packet (REWP) by a reference atom, the orientation dependence can be used to reconstruct the shape of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)ilzn04 . The molecular orbital tomography is based on the assumptions that, i) a reference atom exists that is mainly characterized by an ionization potential close to that of the molecule and, ii) the spectral amplitude of the REWP for the reference atom is always identical to that of the molecule, independent of the alignment of the moleculeilzn04 ; S. Patchkovskii ; R. Torres ; Le ; S. Patchkovskii2 . Investigation of the foundations of molecular orbital tomography has led to valuable insights into the mechanism of atomic and molecular HHG. For example, Levesque et al.Levesque conjectures a universality in the behavior of atomic HHG spectra scaled by the recombination transition atomic dipole moment. This conjecture and many other assumptions connected to the idea of molecular orbital tomography call for a thorough theoretical examination.
In the present paper, we directly examine the second assumption by numerically calculating the spectral amplitudes for 1D and 2D H molecular ions with different internuclear distances and laser intensities. Through comparison with reference atoms that share the same ionization potential, we find that the REWP of H is strongly dependent on its orientation in certain energy regimes where the interference between the two atomic cores of the molecules dominatesMuth-Bohm . Analytically, we apply the Lewenstein theory to N and CO molecules that have different HOMOs and internuclear distances. Our theoretical calculations validate the assumption for N in the plateau region of the harmonic spectra that are of most crucial for tomographic reconstruction of the orbital. But, our calculations invalidate the assumption for CO, showing a strong orientation dependence of the spectra in the plateau region due to the interference. This finding suggests that for molecules such as CO, to accurately reconstruct its orbital using the HHG, the interference effects need to be considered.
The Hamiltonian of H or hydrogen-like atoms studied here is with soft-Coulomb potential and for the 1D and 2D case, respectively, where is the effective charge, is the internuclear separation for H, and a.u. corresponds to the hydrogen-like atom, (for and a.u., the ground state energy for H reproduced here is a.u. in both cases). is the external electric field. Here, we suppose that the molecular axis is coincident with the x-axis and the external field is linearly polarized with an orientation angle of to the molecular axis. In the following calculations, the atom units of are adopted. Our calculation will be performed for nm trapezoidally shaped laser pulses with a total duration of optical cycles and linear ramps of three optical cycles. Numerically, the above Schrödinger equation is solved by the operator-splitting method. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) is employed to transform the wave function between the position representation and the momentum representation. The boundary is set as a.u. and the grid number is . The ground state is obtained by propagation in imaginary time. The numerical convergence is checked with using a finer grid. The coherent part of the harmonic spectrum is obtained from the Fourier transformed dipole acceleration expectation value, and only the harmonics polarized parallel to the incoming field are consideredlein1 .
According to Ref.ilzn04 , the spectral amplitude is
(1) |
where is the transition dipole matrix element of the atom or molecule between the ground state and the continuum state , is the radiated harmonic signal, is the photon energy, and is the electronic kinetic energy with . is the ionization potential of the atom or molecule.
Fig. 1(a) plots the spectral amplitudes of 1D H with a.u. and its reference atom with a.u., where is calculated from the numerical spectrum data by dividing by the transition matrix elements with the obtained by numerically diagonalizing the field-free Hamiltonian . The corresponding transition dipoles used in Fig. 1(a) are shown in Fig. 1(b) and will be discussed in detail bellow. The amplitude for H in Fig. 1(a) is consistent with that of its reference atom in the high energy region but different in the low energy region, because it shows a pronounced peak structure, i.e., the amplitude of the peaks is one-order of magnitude higher.
We now extend these calculations to 2D. Fig. 2 plots the spectral amplitudes of 2D models of H for varied molecular parameters and field intensities. The spectral amplitudes are calculated from the numerical spectrum data by dividing by the transition matrix elements in the length gauge with obtained by the LCAO-MO approximation, and obtained by the plane wave approximation and the dispersion relation Levesque . For , the spectral amplitudes of the models of H and their corresponding reference atoms, which have been shifted vertically to compensate for differing the overall efficiency, are analogous (see Fig. 2(a) and (b)). However, for other angles, the most remarkable feature exhibited in Fig. 2(c)-2(f) is the peak structure at the electron kinetic energy that shifts rightward as the orientation angle increases. Except for these peaks, the spectral amplitudes of the other energy regimes are analogous. In addition, for the same orientation angle but different internuclear distance, the location of the peaks is shifted. For example, at , the peak is at a.u. in Fig. 2(c), but it shifts to a.u. in Fig. 2(d). For the same internuclear distance, at a fixed orientation angle the location of the peaks is almost unchanged when laser intensity varies, as revealed by Fig. 2(c) with and 2(e) with . These calculations on 1D and 2D H for diverse internuclear distance and laser intensities show that the spectral amplitudes of the molecules are usually dependent on the molecular orientation.
Next, we explain the mechanism behind these phenomena according to the Lewenstein modelLewenstein , where the time-dependent wave functions can be expanded under the strong-field approximation, where is the ground-state amplitude, and are the amplitudes of the corresponding continuum states, and can be written in the closed form
(2) |
where is the vector potential of the laser field . The time dependent dipole moment can be written as where = denotes the initial electronic state and = denotes the REWP. Eq. 2 shows that the time-dependent continuum amplitude is not only dependent on the particular ionization potential in the exponent of the integrand, but also depends on the ground state wave function through the transition dipole in the prefactor of the integrand. Thus, the continuum amplitudes of the molecule and its reference atom sharing the same ionization potential should have the same time-dependent phase, but their transition dipoles differ.
The above theoretical analysis has been checked by numerical simulation. For the 1D case, Fig. 1(b) clearly demonstrates that the transition dipole for H is different from that for its reference atom. The transition dipole for H shows a deep hollow (the amplitude of the hollow may be up to four order of magnitude lower) around a.u., but is analogous with its reference atom in a broad higher energy region ( a.u.). The ionization potential of H is similar to its reference atom, and their transition dipoles also are analogous in a broad high energy region. Therefor, we expect that their spectral amplitudes , which are determined by , also should be analogous in the high energy region, but different in the low energy region, as shown by Fig. 1(a). In addition, the location of the hollow in Fig. 1(b) corresponds to that of the peak in Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 3 shows the 2D transition dipoles used to produce Fig. 2. The transition dipoles for the reference atoms (the black curves in each subpanel of Fig. 3) are analogous, but the transition dipoles for the models of H with different show strong orientation dependence. The deep hollow moves as the angle changes. But, at , the transition dipoles for the models of H are similar to that of the reference atoms in the energy region = a.u.. Thus we expect that, for , the spectral amplitude of H should be identical with its reference atom, but for , they will show a large difference in the energy region where the deep hollow in the transition dipole of H appears. This theory is verified by the plot in Fig. 2.
The 1D and 2D numerical results show that intrinsic properties of the molecules already enter the REWP. The deep hollows in the transition dipoles of H with different can be read from the interference effect as predicted by Muth-Bohm Muth-Bohm . Under the LCAO-MO approximation, the ground state of the diatomic molecule is where is the atomic ground state and and are the normalization factors with for symmetric mixing and for antisymmetric mixing. For symmetric mixing, e.g., H, the transition dipole can be written as
(3) |
Here The of the first term in Eq. 3 represents the interference between the two cores of the moleculesMuth-Bohm , and the second term is proportional to the internuclear distance in Eq. 3, leading to the breakdown of translation invariance. In our calculations, the second term is omitted according to Ref.cj ; Milosevic ; W. Becker . Thus, the transition dipole of the molecule is different from that of the reference atom due to the interference effect from the term . The interference that manifests itself as the hollows in the spectra of the transition dipole or the peaks in the HHG spectral amplitudes for the molecules, depends on the alignment angle and can be located by where is an integer. For a.u. and , the formula with the dispersion relation predicts the hollow location of a.u., which is close to our numerical result of a.u. in Fig. 1(b). If the dispersion relation Levesque is adopted, the location is estimated at a.u., far away from the numerical result. We have calculated the dependence of the minima positions (in energy ) on molecular internuclear distance in the 1D case. It shows that for the larger (i.e., a.u). and larger momenta (i.e., a.u.), where the LCAO-MO approximation for the ground state and the plane wave approximation for the continuum are expected to be more applicable, the above simple formula gives a good estimation on the location of the minima, i.e., the deviation is less than .
In addition, the transition dipoles for the reference atoms with different ionization potentials, as shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(b), are almost identical. We attribute the difference in their HHG spectral amplitudes revealed by comparing Fig. 2(a) and 2(b) to the difference in their ionization potentials. The dependence of the spectral amplitude on the ionization potential is also evident in the current theories of tunnel ionization (ADKAmmosov , Yudin and IvanovGennady , MO-ADKTong ), where the ionization potential explicitly appears in the exponent of the formula determining the cycle dependence of the ionization rate. Thus, we expect that the time dependence of the continuum wave packet also relies on the ionization potential. Moreover, the present experiment for the orientation dependence of ionization rate of CO shows a pronounced deviation from the prediction by the MO-ADK theory. The interference caused by the separated cores is not well described by the simple theoryDomagoj . Thus, we expect that the dependence of the continuum wave packet on the HOMO is also not well described by the model. Based on this analysis, we conclude that due to the interference effect, the ionization and acceleration processes in the three-step modelCorkum also play an important role in HHG from molecules. In fact, in our calculations, the hollows in Fig. 3 for molecules are responsible for the interference minima in harmonic spectra predicted by Lein lein1 .
This analysis demonstrates that the spectral amplitude of the molecular REWP is different from its reference atom due to the interference. However, why can the molecular orbital tomography experiment reconstruct the HOMO of N by its reference atom Ar ilzn04 ? In Fig. 4, we plot the transition dipoles along the laser polarization direction ((a) and (c)) and the spectral amplitudes ((b) and (d)) of N and CO with different orientation angles . The corresponding harmonic spectra are obtained by the Lewenstein model with the dispersion relation ilzn04 ; Levesque . For N with a.u., the interference hollows at different angles should all appear in the high energy region, i.e., far away from the plateau regime. The curves of the transition dipoles in Fig. 4(a) are analogous to each other in the low energy region ( a.u.). Accordingly, the spectral amplitudes in Fig. 4(b) also are analogous to each other in the same energy region within a vertical scaling factor. However, for CO with a.u., the curves of the transition dipoles in Fig. 4(c) show a large difference in the low energy region. The curves of the spectral amplitudes in Fig. 4(d) also are obviously different, showing a sharp peak shifting toward the higher energy region as the angle increases. We thus expect that the spectral amplitude for N in the low energy region is largely independent of molecular orientation ilzn04 . This conclusion is not applicable to CO, for which the interference hollows for small orientation angles should appear in the lower energy region corresponding to lower harmonic orders in the plateau regionTsuneto ; vozzi . The spectral amplitude of CO in that energy region is largely related to its orientation. Therefore, for some molecules, e.g., CO, the interference effect should be included in the orbital tomography experiment to obtain an accurate HOMO wave function.
In summary, from our 1D and 2D numerical calculation and analytical deduction, we find that the assumption of the tomography method, i.e., that the recolliding electron wave packet of a reference atom may be used to extract the HOMO from high order harmonic spectra, may not be generalized to other molecules such as CO. For these molecules, the molecular properties already enter the recolliding electron wave packet so the spectral amplitude of the molecular REWP shows a large difference from the reference atom and a strong orientation dependence in some energy regions due to the interference between the atomic cores of the molecule.
This work has been supported by NNSF Grant No. 10725521, CAEP Foundation Project No. 2006Z0202, 973 Research Project No. 2006CB806000, and by National Fundamental Research Programme of China under Grant Nos. 2006CB921400 and 2007CB814800.
References
- (1) R. Velotta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183901, (2001).
- (2) J. Itatani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 94, 123902, (2005).
- (3) X. X. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 033412 (2005).
- (4) C. B. Madsen and L. B. Madsen, Phys. Rev. A 74, 023403 (2006).
- (5) M. Lein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 183903, (2002); Phys. Rev. A 66, 023805 (2002); M. Lein, et al., ibid. 67, 023819 (2003).
- (6) G. L. Kamta and A. D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053407 (2005).
- (7) T. Kanai, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, Nature 435, 470(2005).
- (8) C. Vozzi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 153902 (2005).
- (9) J. Itatani et al., Nature 432, 867(2004).
- (10) S. Patchkovskii et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 123003, (2006).
- (11) R. Torres et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 203007, (2007).
- (12) Van-Hoang Le et al., Phys. Rev. A 76, 013414 (2007).
- (13) S. Patchkovskii et al., J. Chem. Phys.126, 114306 (2007).
- (14) J. Levesque et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 183903(2007).
- (15) J. Muth-Bohm, A. Becker, and F. H. M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2280(4) (2000)
- (16) M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, Anne L’ Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117(1994).
- (17) J. Chen and S. G. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 75, 041402(R) (2007).
- (18) D. B. Milosevic, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063404 (2006).
- (19) W. Becker et al., Phys. Rev. A 76, 033403 (2007).
- (20) M. V. Ammosov, N. B. Delone and V. P. Krainov, Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 1191(1986).
- (21) Gennady L. Yudin and Misha Yu. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A 64, 013409 (2001).
- (22) X. M. Tong, Z. X. Zhao, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 66, 033402 (2002).
- (23) D. Pavii et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 243001 (2007).
- (24) P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994(1993).