HyLIRGs amidst distant starbursting cluster



Panchromatic observations of the best candidate HyLIRG from the widest Herschel extragalactic imaging survey have led to the discovery of at least four intrinsically luminous galaxies across a 100-kpc region – a cluster of starbursting proto-ellipticals. Via sub-arcsecond interferometric imaging we have measured accurate gas and star-formation surface densities. The two brightest galaxies span 3 kpc FWHM in submm/radio continuum and CO , and double that in CO . The broad CO line is due partly to the multitude of constituent galaxies and partly to large rotational velocities in two counter-rotating gas disks – a scenario predicted to lead to the most intense starbursts, which will therefore come in pairs. The disks have of several  M, and gas fractions of %. Velocity dispersions are modest so the disks are unstable, potentially on scales commensurate with their radii: these galaxies are undergoing extreme bursts of star formation, not confined to their nuclei, at close to the Eddington limit. Their specific star-formation rates place them above the main sequence, which supposedly comprises large gas disks like these. Their high star-formation efficiencies are difficult to reconcile with a simple volumetric star-formation law. -body and dark matter simulations suggest this system is the progenitor of a B(inary)-type -M cluster.

Subject headings:
galaxies: high-redshift — galaxies: starburst — submillimeter: galaxies — infrared: galaxies — radio continuum: galaxies — radio lines: galaxies

1. Introduction

Of the known denizons of the galaxy zoo, hyperluminous infrared (IR) galaxies (HyLIRGs,  L, where the IR luminosity is measured across –1000 m) are amongst the rarest and most extreme. They provide excellent laboratories with which to confront the most recent hydrodynamic simulations of isolated and merging galaxies (e.g. Hayward et al., 2011). The of a HyLIRG implies a staggering star-formation rate,  M yr (Kennicutt, 1998, for a Chabrier 2003 initial mass function, IMF), unless the IMF is top-heavy, or there is a substantial contribution to from a deeply obscured AGN, in which case we are seeing intense star formation accompanied by the rapid growth of a massive black hole (Alexander et al., 2008). Either way, we are witnessing galaxy formation at its most extreme.

How best can we identify the most luminous star-forming HyLIRGs? A promising method involves searching amongst the brightest sources detected in the widest surveys with Herschel. These comprise blazars, low-redshift spirals and some intrinsically fainter sources that have been strongly lensed (e.g. Negrello et al., 2010). However, there is also the intriguing possibility that such samples may contain unlensed and thus intrinsically luminous galaxies – the rarest HyLIRGs are predicted to have a space density,  Mpc and may mark the sites of today’s clusters (Negrello et al., 2005; Lapi et al., 2011).

Of the facilities providing redshifts for bright Herschel sources, the 100-m Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT), together with the ultrawide-bandwidth Zpectrometer cross-correlation spectrometer and Ka-band receiver, have been amongst the most effective (e.g. Swinbank et al., 2010; Frayer et al., 2011). Having added considerably to the sample of such sources with known redshifts, Harris et al. (2012) identified a flat trend of with C line58 width. This contrasted with the steep power-law relation between and CO line width found by Bothwell et al. (2013) for unlensed SMGs, as expected if the most gas-rich galaxies tend to live in the most massive gravitational potentials. Harris et al. argued that intrinsically fainter sources require a higher lensing magnification, , to rise above the observational detection threshold for CO , which is approximately constant in flux. The flat trend seen in the GBT sample is then best interpreted as lensing magnification acting on a population with intrinsically steep number counts. Those GBT sources closest to the power-law fit seen for SMGs – typically those with the widest lines – are likely to be suffering the least lensing magnification. This is where we might expect to find any HyLIRGs that are lurking amongst the lensed starbursts.

Our approach here, therefore, is to search for HyLIRGs amongst those bright Herschel lens candidates with the broadest CO lines, starting with the best example in the sample observed with GBT by Harris et al., HATLAS J084933.4+021443 (hereafter HATLAS J084933, with 350-m flux density,  mJy), which displays a line consistent with CO  at , with a full width at half maximum (fwhm) of  km s and  mJy. The amplification predicted by Harris et al. for HATLAS J084933 is consistent with unity, .

In the next section we describe an extensive set of observations. We present, analyse, interpret and discuss our reduced images, spectra and cubes in §3, finishing with our conclusions in §4. We adopt a cosmology with  km s Mpc, and , so 1 equates to 8.25 kpc at .

2. Observations and data reduction

Herschel imaging, undertaken as part of the wide-field H-ATLAS imaging survey (Eales et al., 2010), led to the selection of HATLAS J084933 as a potentially distant, lensed starburst: distant, because it is an example of a so-called ’350-m peaker’, with its thermal dust peak between the 250- and 500-m bands; lensed, because models of the far-IR/submm source counts suggest that the majority of objects with  mJy are expected to be either local () or lensed (e.g. Negrello et al., 2010), along with the occasional flat-spectrum radio quasar.

On the basis that it represented the best chance of finding an intrinsically luminous system rather than a lensed galaxy, following the arguments laid out in §1, HATLAS J084933 was selected for observations with the Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA). Here we detail the JVLA observations and those obtained with other facilities that followed as a consequence of our initial findings, presenting these datasets in order of decreasing wavelength.

2.1. Jvla Co  and 5-GHz continuum imaging

Whilst the National Radio Astronomy Observatory’s (NRAO’s) JVLA59 was in its DnC, C, B, BnA and A configurations, between 2012 January and 2013 January, we acquired 30 hr of Ka-band data, scheduled dynamically to ensure excellent atmospheric phase and pointing stability. We recorded two sets of eight contiguous baseband pairs, -MHz dual-polarization channels in total. We tuned the first set of basebands to cover CO and C. The C transition ( GHz, Morton & Noreau, 1994) was placed in the second set of baseband pairs, offseting down by 64 MHz to 33.740 GHz to avoid baseband edges.

Around 4 hr of A-configuration C-band data were also obtained, recording -MHz dual-polarization channels every 1 sec across 4.2–6.5 GHz, with a small gap. Typically, 0.3 GHz was lost to severe radio-frequency interference near 6.1 GHz, yielding a band center of 5.1 GHz (5.9 cm).

PKS J0825+0309 and PKS J0839+0319 were observed every few minutes to determine accurate complex gain solutions and bandpass corrections in the Ka and C bands, respectively. 3C 286 was observed to set the absolute flux density scale, and the pointing accuracy was checked locally every hour.

The data were reduced using . The basebands were knitted together using the noifs and vbglu tasks, yielding datasets with two intermediate frequencies, each comprising -MHz channels.

For the spectral-line data, these were then imaged in groups of four channels (71 km s), with natural weighting. A variety of Gaussian tapers were used to weight the data, with distances to the 30 per cent point of the Gaussian ranging from 100 to 1,000 k, to form a number of cubes with FWHM spatial resolutions ranging from to . The line-integrated map shown in Fig. 1 has a synthesized beam.

The naturally-weighted 5.1-GHz pseudo-continuum data were imaged, averaging all of the channels, loosely following the techniques outlined by Owen & Morrison (2008). The resulting map has a spatial resolution of (PA, 26) and an r.m.s. noise level of 2.9 Jy beam (Fig. 1).

2.2. Co  imaging from CARMA

We used CARMA60 to observe the CO  line ( GHz, redshifted to =101.406 GHz). Observations were carried out with the 3-mm receivers and the CARMA spectral-line correlator, with an effective bandwidth of 3.7 GHz per sideband and a spectral resolution of 15 km s. Four tracks were obtained between 2012 February 13–17 in the C configuration (15–352-m baselines), with 14 usable antennas and a total on-source observing time of 13.5 hr. The nearby quasar, PKS J0757+0956, was used for complex gain calibration. The bandpass shape and absolute flux calibration (the latter good to 15%) were derived from observations of Mars, PKS J0854+2006 and 3C 84. Using natural weighting, we obtained a FWHM beam size of (PA, 126), with a noise level,  mJy beam (Fig. 1).

2.3. Co  imaging from IRAM PdBI

During 2012 February we obtained data using six 15-m antennas in the most extended configuration of the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique’s Plateau de Bure Interferometer (IRAM61 PdBI), with baselines ranging up to 800 m.

The observing frequency was set to 135.203 GHz, the redshifted frequency of the CO  line ( GHz). The weather conditions were exceptionally good with a precipitable water vapour of around 2 mm and \kelvin on average. PKS J0825+0309 and PKS J0909+0121 were used to calibrate the complex gains, while 3C 84 and MWC 349 were chosen as bandpass and absolute flux calibrators. The r.m.s. noise level is 0.97 mJy beam in 4-MHz-wide spectral channels, for a synthesized beam measuring FWHM (PA, 24). Using only the line-free channels, the r.m.s. noise level is 47 Jy beam.

We also report continuum photometry at 1.36 mm from observations obtained throughout 2012 as part of a search for water that will be reported elsewhere.

2.4. 870-m continuum imaging from the SMA

Approximately 1.4, 4.9 and 1.7 hr of integration were obtained using the Submillimeter Array (SMA62) in its compact, extended and very-extended array configurations during 2011 December 8, 2012 January 31 and 2012 March 31, respectively (2011B-S044). The receivers were tuned such that the upper sideband was centered at 345 GHz (870 m), with 8 GHz of single-polarization bandwidth in total. 3C 84 was used as the bandpass calibrator and Titan was used for absolute flux calibration. PKS J0825+0309 and PKS J0909+0121 were again used to track and check the phase and gain.

A robust = 2 weighting scheme resulted in a beam FWHM (PA, 86) and a noise level,  mJy beam (Fig. 1).

2.5. 350-m continuum imaging with CSO/SHARC-2

A total of 80 min of data were collected at 350 m during periods of excellent weather between 2012 January 12–13 at the 10.4-m Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO63), using the SHARC-2 camera (Dowell et al., 2003). We took advantage of the open-loop, actuated surface of the telescope (Leong et al., 2006) and we checked and updated the focus settings several times each night, resulting in near-Gaussian, diffraction-limited (8.5 FWHM) beam profiles. Data were reduced using crush (Kovács, 2008) and the resulting maps have a noise level,  mJy beam (Fig. 1).

2.6. Continuum imaging from Herschel

The acquisition and reduction of Herschel (Pilbratt et al., 2010) parallel-mode data from SPIRE (Griffin et al., 2010) and PACS (Poglitsch et al., 2010) for the 9-hr Science Demonstration Phase field of H-ATLAS (Eales et al., 2010) are described in detail by Ibar et al. (2010a), Pascale et al. (2011) and Rigby et al. (2011). Here, we use the original SPIRE imaging and have obtained much deeper PACS data from the ot1 programme, ot1_rivison_1. We recorded data simultaneously at 100 and 160 m whilst tracking across the target at 20 s in ten 3-arcmin strips, each offset orthogonally by 4. A total of 180 s on source was acquired for each of two near-orthogonal scans. These data were tackled with a variant of the pipeline developed by Ibar et al. (2010b), reaching and 7 mJy at 100 and 160 m, respectively. The 160-m PACS image is shown in Fig. 1.

2.7. Infrared continuum imaging from Spitzer, VISTA and the Hubble Space Telescope

3.6- and 4.5-m images were acquired using the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC – Fazio et al., 2004) aboard Spitzer64 (Werner et al., 2004) on 2012 June 24 as part of program 80156. The imaging involved a 36-position dither pattern, with a total exposure time of just over 1 ks, reaching r.m.s. depths of 0.3 and 0.4 Jy at 3.6 and 4.5 m, respectively. Corrected basic calibrated data, pre-processed by the Spitzer Science Center, were spatially aligned and combined into mosaics (shown in Fig. 1) with a re-sampled pixel size of 0.6 and angular resolution of 2–2.5, using version 18.5.0 of mopex (Makovoz & Marleau, 2005).

Images were obtained in and as part of VIKING, a public survey with the 4-m Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) at Paranal, Chile (Emerson & Sutherland, 2010), with an image quality of 0.9 FWHM, as shown in Fig. 1.

A SNAPshot observation was obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope65 (HST) on 2012 February 08, as part of Cycle-19 proposal 12488, using Wide-Field Camera 3 (WFC3) with its wide filter, F110W. The total exposure time was 252 s. Data were reduced using the iraf MultiDrizzle package. Individual frames were corrected for distortion, cleaned by cosmic rays and other artifacts and median combined. The resulting image was re-sampled to a finer pixel scale of 0.064 and is shown in Fig. 1.

2.8. Optical spectroscopy from Keck

We observed several optical/IR sources in the vicinity of HATLAS J084933 using the DEIMOS spectrograph on the 10-m Keck-ii telescope66 during 2012 March 02. DEIMOS was used with its 600ZD grating (ruled with 600 lines mm), the GG455 filter and a 1 slit at a central wavelength of 720 nm. Two positions were targeted, each with a different PA, for 40 and 75 min.

3. Results, analysis and discussion

3.1. Basic morphological description

At the spatial resolution of SPIRE, HATLAS J08493 is essentially unresolved. However, with only modestly improved spatial resolution, via deep imaging with PACS at 100–160 m and CSO/SHARC-2 at 350 m, the system is resolved into two sources, referred to hereafter as W and T (Fig. 1).

Moving to higher spatial resolution, via interferometric imaging with SMA, IRAM PdBI and CARMA at rest-frame 255–880 m, we see a consistent morphological picture for the emission from cool dust in the HATLAS J084933 system (Fig. 1). The dust continuum emission is dominated by W and T, which are separated by 10.5, or 85 kpc in the plane of the sky, with W the brightest of the two from the optical all the way through to the radio regime. W is amongst the brightest unlensed SMGs ever observed interferometrically at submm wavelengths, with T not far behind (Gear et al., 2000; Lutz et al., 2001; Younger et al., 2007, 2008, 2009; Wang et al., 2007; Aravena et al., 2010; Smolčić et al., 2012a, b). Amongst the unlensed SMG population, its flux density has been equalled only by SMM J123711+622212 (also known as GN 20, – Pope et al., 2005; Iono et al., 2006).

Aided by our interferometric astrometry we can see that at optical/IR wavelengths the westernmost clump, T, is barely visible as a red extension to a lenticular galaxy (Fig. 1). W coincides with the extremely red component of a red/blue pair, separated by 2. Based on experience with SMGs such as SMM J023990136 (e.g. Ferkinhoff et al., in preparation), we expected to find evidence of an AGN towards the compact blue source, but found instead that it is a star – our optical spectroscopy (§2.8) reveals absorption due to Mg as well as the Na D doublet.

There is no obvious trend with wavelength for the relative IR/submm flux density contributions from W and T (listed in Table 1), , , , , and at 100 m, 160 m, 350 m, 870 m, 1.36 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The error-weighted mean for the IR/submm wavelength regime is . Moving longward to rest-frame 1.7 cm, where we expect the emission to be dominated by synchrotron radiation related to supernova (SN) remnants, HATLAS J084933 is also dominated by component W (Fig. 1), with .

0.88 m Jy; VISTA
1.02 m Jy; VISTA
1.1 m Jy; F110W
1.25 m Jy; VISTA
1.65 m Jy; VISTA
2.15 m Jy; VISTA
3.6 m Jy; IRAC
4.5 m Jy; IRAC
100 m 67 68 mJy; PACS
160 m 69 70 mJy; PACS
250 m 71 mJy; SPIRE
350 m 72 mJy; SPIRE
500 m 73 mJy; SPIRE
870 m mJy; SMA
1.36 mm mJy; PdBI
2.21 mm mJy; PdBI
3.0 mm mJy; CARMA
8.8 mm mJy; JVLA
5.9 cm mJy; JVLA
0.88 m Jy; VISTA
1.02 m Jy; VISTA
1.1 m Jy; F110W
1.25 m Jy; VISTA
1.65 m Jy; VISTA
2.15 m Jy; VISTA
3.6 m Jy; IRAC
4.5 m Jy; IRAC
870 m mJy; SMA
1.36 mm mJy; PdBI
2.21 mm mJy; PdBI
5.9 cm mJy; JVLA
Table 1Continuum flux densities

Figure 1.— Morphology of HATLAS J084933 at moderate-to-high spatial resolution. Top left: 160-, 350- and 870-m continuum emission from dust, as detected by Herschel/PACS, CSO/SHARC-2 and the SMA, superimposed on a three-color representation of the VISTA and data. We see two bright components: W is centered on a red galaxy, near a blue star; T lies at the end of a lenticular galaxy at , coincident with its red southern tip. Dust emission can also be seen coincident with two further galaxies, labelled C and M, to the east of W. Both C and M can also seen in continuum at 5.9 cm (see lower right), at 1.36 mm, 2.21 mm, and in CO  and . Top right: CO  emission superimposed on a three-color representation of the Spitzer IRAC 3.6- and 4.5-m imaging and a heavily smoothed VISTA image as the blue channel. CO emission is coincident with the two submm-bright clumps, W and T. An apparent extension south of T is mirrored in the IRAC image, suggesting that both are real. Lower left: JVLA CO  imaging superimposed on our HST WFC3 F110W snapshot, wherein we see faint diffraction spikes from the stars. Distorted, low-surface-brightness emission is seen coincident with galaxy C, characteristic of an interaction. Lower right: stamps centered on M, C, W and T, showing our JVLA 5.8-cm continuum imaging as blue contours superimposed on the HST F110W imaging. At the high spatial resolution available here via interferometric imaging, we see a consistent morphological picture for the emission from cool gas and dust in the HATLAS J084933 system. The emission is dominated by W and T, which are separated from one another by 85 kpc in the plane of the sky, with significant emission also visible from two fainter galaxies, C and M. Individually, W and T are well resolved spatially. In all panels, contours are plotted at , with -spaced increments thereafter, where is the local noise level. Beam FWHM are shown as solid ellipses. N is up; E to the left; offsets from are marked in arcseconds. Known stars are labelled.

Continuum emission from dust is also seen east of W, from a galaxy we label M in Fig. 1. M is detected securely in 870-m, 1.36-mm, 2.21-mm and 5.9-cm continuum (Table 1).

Still further to the east, emission can be seen from a very red, morphologically distorted galaxy – labelled C in Fig. 1 – which bears a strong resemblence to the Antennae (e.g. Whitmore & Schweizer, 1995; Klaas et al., 2010). C is detected weakly in 870-m, 1.36-mm, 2.21-mm and 5.9-cm continuum (Table 1).

As we shall see in more detail later (§3.5), C and M are also detected in our CO  and  spectral-line imaging, i.e. they also lie at , alongside W and T.

Both M and C are coincident with IRAC 3.6–4.5-m emission, suggesting that these are not tidal tails or gaseous streams, but rather significant concentrations of stars, gas and dust – luminous SMGs in their own right.

Our deep rest-frame 133–289-nm Keck spectroscopy (§2.8), with slits covering W, T and C, reveals no significant line emission from T and C; the only line visible from W, albeit very faint, is C ii at 232.6 nm.

Our CO  image from CARMA is shown in Fig. 1. It is interesting to note that the low-level southern extension to the  emission from T is mirrored at 3.6–4.5-m, which suggests that both are real.

3.2. Lensing model

The lenticular galaxy that lies along the line of sight to component T lies at , as revealed by our optical spectroscopic observations (§2.8), where the slit was placed along the major axis of the lenticular. Correcting for the instrumental resolution, the lines due to Mg and Ca H and K suggest the foreground galaxy has a velocity dispersion of  km s. Its stellar mass is  M, adopting the approach outlined later in §3.4. We have modelled this galaxy with an elliptical () mass profile, truncated smoothly at a radius of 25 kpc (the exact choice has little effect since the lensed image is well within this radius). The line of sight to the starburst lies close to the semi-major axis of this foreground structure and suffers a magnification of , where the uncertainty was calculated by varying the model parameters – orientation, ellipticity and velocity dispersion – by 10%.

Galaxy W suffers no significant lensing magnification, as far as it is possible to discern from our extensive, wide-field, panchromatic imaging data (§2.7), which are not easily reconciled with a massive foreground galaxy group or cluster.

Property W T M C
R.A. (J2000) 08:49:33.59 08:49:32.96 08:49:33.80 08:49:33.91
Dec. (J2000) +02:14:44.6 +02:14:39.7 +02:14:45.6 +02:14:45.0
Mean FWHM at 5.9 cm, 870 m and in CO  kpc  kpc74 75 76
FWHM in CO  /kpc  kpc  kpc77 78 79
log  /L 80
SFR /M yr (Kennicutt, 1998, Chabrier 2003 IMF) 3400 150081 800 640
 /k 82 83
84 85
log  /M 86 87 88
CO   /Jy km s
CO   /\kelvin km s pc
CO   / L
CO  FWHM /km s
CO and C  /Jy km s 89 90 91 92
CO   /Jy km s
CO  FWHM /km s
CO   93
CO   /Jy km s
CO  FWHM /km s
/km s
/kpc 94 95 96
log /M 97
log /M, for  M (\kelvin km s pc) 98
SFE /L M 370 210 99 760 440
log /M 100 10
Table 2Properties of HATLAS J084933.4+021443

3.3. Spectral energy distributions of W and T

Figure 2.— Radio-through-optical SEDs of the dominant components of HATLAS J084933, W (red points, solid line) and T (blue points, dotted line). Our measurements cover the SED peak, constraining  and  well. The SEDs can be fitted adequately using a combination of thermal dust and synchrotron emission components (see §3.3) plus the stellar population modelling described in §3.4. The key resulting characteristics, , , , and  are listed in Table 2.

Figure 3.— CO spectra of HATLAS J084933. Upper two panels: CO  spectra of galaxies W and T superimposed on solid representations of the CO  spectra (the former scaled by 16 to put them on the same  scale). The two galaxies both have extraordinarily broad CO lines but the profiles are noticably different, so they are not lensed images of the same galaxy. The profiles of the CO transitions are indistinguishable for each individual component; their  ratios are also similar (Table 2). Middle two panels: CO  spectra of galaxies M and C, with line centers significantly redwards of W and T. Lower panel: JVLA CO  spectra of W and T alongside the significantly different profile from GBT/Zpectrometer (Harris et al., 2012). Emission at velocities redward of W and T – from M and C and several other faint clumps seen in the JVLA data, spanning a 100-kpc region – can account for the differences between the GBT and JVLA line profiles.

Fig. 2 shows the SED of HATLAS J084933, concentrating on the brightest components, W and T. Our CSO/SHARC-2 350-m imaging provides evidence that – at the peak of their SEDs – the relative SPIRE contributions of components W and T follow the average ratio seen in the resolved imaging, , as described in §3.1. Perhaps unsurprisingly, then, we then find they contribute in roughly the same ratio, , to an immense overall bolometric luminosity of HATLAS J084933,  L (Table 2), having corrected the contribution from T for gravitational amplification (§3.2).

The IR-through-radio photometry can be described adequately with a model comprising synchrotron and thermal dust emission, following Kovács et al. (2010). Table 2 summarises a simultaneous fit to the dominant cold dust temperature, , to  and  (as defined by Helou et al., 1985, but where is measured across –1000 m, as is ), and to  (for a characteristic photon cross-section to mass ratio,  m kgDunne et al. 2000; Dunne & Eales 2001 – where we fixed the frequency dependence of the dust emissivity, , to be 2.0, which is physically plausible and consistent with the best-fit value, ). We fixed the synchrotron power-law index, , where , and we also fixed – the power-law index of a dust temperature distribution appropriate for local starbursts, , which is designed to offer a physically motivated treatment of the Wien side of the thermal emission spectrum. Both W and T have –40 \kelvin, commensurate with similarly luminous, dusty starbursts at –3, when calculated using a power-law temperature distribution (Magnelli et al., 2012).

We are sensitive to AGN activity via our optical imaging and spectroscopy (§2.8) and our radio/mid-IR imaging (§2.1, §2.7). In relation to the far-IR/radio flux ratio, W and T have  = and , respectively, spanning (and consistent with) the tight correlation for star-forming galaxies (, e.g. Yun et al., 2001). Summarizing, we have no evidence101 that an AGN contributes significantly to the  of HATLAS J084933, though of course we have no evidence of absence since even a powerful AGN can be hidden very effectively by the quantities of dust-rich gas in this system.

If contributions to from AGN are small, then W and T are generating stars at a rate of 3400 and 1500 M yr, respectively, for a Chabrier (2003) IMF (Kennicutt, 1998, though see Dwek et al. 2011). The estimates of  for C and M given in Table 2 are scaled from their submm photometry relative to W and T, assuming the same SED shape. This suggests that both are close to being HyLIRGs in their own right,  L.

Before closing our SED discussion, we add a word of caution regarding our estimated IR luminosities. If W and T lie in the core of a proto-cluster, as we shall see in what follows, then lower-luminosity star-forming cluster galaxies may contribute to the flux densities measured by the relatively large SPIRE beam at 250–500 m (see Negrello et al., 2005). Although the calibration cannot compare with that of Herschel, SHARC-2 recovers less flux than SPIRE at 350 m, a possible manifestation of the proto-cluster.

3.4. Stellar masses

The rest-frame ultraviolet-through-near-IR SEDs of W and T are illustrated in Fig. 2, alongside the far-IR–submm–radio data. Flux densities are listed in in Table 1. Our high-quality HST, VIKING and IRAC images at 0.88–4.5 m are compromised to a certain extent by the unfortunate super-position of a star and a lenticular galaxy near W and T, respectively, but the considerable uncertainties associated with estimating stellar mass dominate over the photometric uncertainties (see, e.g., Hainline et al., 2011; Michalowski et al., 2012).

For components W, T and C we find best-fitting monochromatic rest-frame -band luminosities, , of 11.82, 11.46 and 11.12 L, respectively. Stellar masses were determined using magphys with the most recent version of the stellar population models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003), a Chabrier (2003) IMF and the SED prior distributions described by da Cunha, Charlot, & Elbaz (2008), following Rowlands et al. (2012). The models encompass a wide range of exponentially declining star-formation histories (SFHs), with bursts superimposed (see da Cunha et al., 2008, for details). The implied stellar masses are and  M for W, T and C, where the errors are derived from the marginalised probability density function, which incorporates the uncertainties in the SFH102 and photometry. Systematic shifts in stellar mass of  dex result from adopting a Salpeter IMF or ignoring thermally pulsating stars on the asymptotic giant branch, and the magnitude of photometric contamination by buried AGN could well be similar, so we estimate that our stellar mass estimates are accurate to  dex.

Emission from M can be seen at 3.6–4.5 m but the photometric uncertainties due to blending with C and W are large so we state only that its stellar mass must be considerable,  M.

There is little sign of the power-law SEDs that can betray the presence of AGN, supporting the lack of AGN spectral features reported in §3.1, though of course this does not rule out the presence of a deeply buried, highly obscured AGN.

3.5. Spectral-line characteristics

Fig. 3 shows the JVLA CO  spectra of W and T alongside our IRAM CO  spectra. These spectral-line data bring us velocity information for the first time, enabling us to see that although W and T do lie at approximately the same redshift and share similar line profiles and  ratios, they have significantly different line widths (Table 2). Each one is thus a distinct, extraordinarily luminous starburst. While the CO line profile of T is typical of SMGs (e.g. Bothwell et al., 2013), that of W is broader than most, with 1000 km s fwzi. Both profiles are flat-topped or perhaps double-peaked; they can not be described well by a single Gaussian.

The CO  fluxes of W and T measured in our JVLA data sum to  Jy km s. At first sight this is consistent with the Harris et al. GBT measurement,  Jy km s. However, the CO  line profiles observed by JVLA and GBT appear noticeably different in Fig. 3: emission in the GBT spectrum continues significantly redward (by 500 km s) of the emission that can attributed to W and T.

Looking at our IRAM PdBI imaging – see Fig. 4 – after subtracting the significant continuum emission (several submm continuum flux densities are listed in Table 1), we see that both C and M are detected securely in CO  (at 9.0 and 7.2 , respectively; we also see 3.6–4.5-m, submm and radio continuum emission – recall Fig. 1). These galaxies are therefore unquestionably real and they share approximately the same redshift as components W and T. Their positions are listed in Table 2, along with those of the two brighter components. Their CO emission is centered 500 km s redward of W and T.

As well as C and M, a number of other faint emission features can seen in the integrated CO  image (Fig. 1). Summing C, M and these faint clumps leads to tolerable agreement between the GBT and JVLA line profiles. Although we must add  Jy km s to , we must also increase by 15% to account for the 8-per-cent lower flux density assumed for 3C 286 by Harris et al. (2012), and for losses due to attenuation of the faint clumps by the GBT primary beam. The agreement103 between the total GBT and JVLA line intensities remains consistent to within and the profile measured by the FWHM GBT primary beam is thereby reconciled with the JVLA data.

3.6. Resolved imaging of the gas and dust

Our interferometric images from JVLA, IRAM PdBI and the SMA have a spatial resolution of FWHM, or  kpc. They allow us to compare the sizes of the regions responsible for emission from the total molecular gas reservoir (via CO  emission), from the star-forming gas (via CO ), from cool dust produced by SNe in regions of recent star formation (via submm continuum emission) and from relativistic electrons spiralling in or near recent SN remnants (via radio continuum emission).

We find that emission from W and T is resolved in all these wavebands, with total flux densities significantly higher than the peak flux densities. In Table 2 we quote their deconvolved fwhm104 sizes at 5.9 cm, 870 m and in CO  and , as determined with 2-D Gaussian fits.

In the absence of significant AGN-powered activity, radio continuum observations trace regions where massive stars have recently been formed, with no obscuration. Of the tracers available to us, we might anticipate the radio emission to be the most compact, as indeed is measured. At 870 m we see no evidence of a more extended emission component, heated by older stars – the deconvolved sizes of W and T are consistent, as measured in 5.9-cm and 870-m continuum, as one might expect given the far-IR/radio correlation (Table 2). The CO  FWHM are slightly larger, as seen for local ULIRGs (e.g. Wilson et al., 2008), but are consistent with the radio and submm values to within the uncertainties.

The error-weighted average of the 5.9-cm and 870-m continuum and CO  FWHM measurements is (PA, ) for W; for T, before correcting for the amplification, we measure (PA, ). In CO , however, W and T have considerably larger deconvolved sizes than those measured in the submm or radio continuum, as seen for SMGs generally (e.g. Ivison et al., 2011; Riechers et al., 2011).

Summarising, we have powerful, direct evidence of starbursts covering –4 kpc FWHM, with still larger reservoirs of gas available to fuel future star formation, on scales of –7 kpc FWHM.

The large sizes measured in CO have been mentioned alongside the relatively high / ratios measured towards a number of SMGs (e.g. Stacey et al., 2010). Both have been taken as evidence that SMGs form stars across larger spatial scales than the compact, nuclear events seen in local ULIRGs.

3.7. Dynamical characteristics

Figure 4.— CO  and  imaging of HATLAS J084933. Left: Velocity-integrated continuum-subtracted CO emission from our JVLA and PdBI observations. In both panels, we mark the positions of the brightest four galaxies, C, M, W and T. Right: Dynamical maps of the galaxies in CO  and . To construct these velocity fields, we fit the CO emission in each cube at each pixel, recording the intensity, velocity and line width where . North is up; East is left. Inset: One-dimensional rotation curves for W and T, extracted along the major kinematic axis identified in the modeling. Both W and T have rotation curves which resemble disks; indeed, W and T are best described as counter-rotating disks, which Mihos & Hernquist (1996) predicted would lead to the most intense starbursts.

Figure 5.— CO  imaging of galaxies W and T, showing left to right their intensities, resolved velocity profiles, line-of-sight velocity dispersions (), our best-fit kinematic model (see text) and the residuals. The color scale for the velocity fields is shown in each panel. We note that there is evidence for lensing shear in the velocity field and line-of-sight velocity dispersion for T.

The most remarkable characteristics of HATLAS J084933 are revealed by the superlative spatial resolution (§3.6), velocity resolution and sensitivity of our JVLA CO  and IRAM PdBI CO  data, as shown in Fig. 4.

To measure the 2-D velocity structure, we fit the CO emission lines, pixel by pixel, in each of the cubes. Initially, we attempt to identify an emission line in regions, increasing this slowly until we reach , at which point we fit the CO profile, allowing the intensity, centroid and width to vary. Uncertainties are calculated by perturbing each parameter independently, allowing the remaining parameters to find their optimum values, until is reached.

We model the two-dimensional velocity fields of W and T by constructing and fitting two-dimensional disk models using an arctan function, , to describe the kinematics (where is the asymptotic inclination-corrected rotational velocity and is the effective radius at which the rotation curve turns over – see Courteau, 1997). We fit six free parameters to the disk velocity field: , , centroid, PA and inclination to the sky. The centroid and must be within the field of view and the maximum circular velocity must be the maximum velocity seen in the data. Quoted uncertainties reflect the range of acceptable models from all of the attempted model fits.

Our velocity cubes reveal that the wide CO line that led to this system being selected as a candidate HyLIRG is due partly to the multitude of constituent galaxies and partly to large regular, systematic rotational velocities in the two brightest constituent galaxies. Both W and T are resolved into counter-rotating gas disks – the scenario that many studies have predicted should lead to the most intense starbursts (e.g. Mihos & Hernquist, 1994, 1996; Taniguchi & Shioya, 1998; Borne et al., 2000; Bekki, 2001; Di Matteo et al., 2007; Salomé et al., 2012).

As shown in Fig. 5, we find acceptable fits for W and T with disk inclinations of and , at PAs of 26 and , with and 370 km s, respectively. Component T is sheared slightly by the foreground lens, as evident from the velocity and maps. Both galaxies show small-scale (30–60-km s, r.m.s.) deviations from the best-fit model. The dynamical masses105 of W and T are listed in Table 2: several  M, where . Their velocity dispersions, , corrected for the instrumental velocity resolution, are  km s.

M has no strong velocity gradient. Its is 20 km s (40 km s, peak to peak),  km s for both CO  and , and  M. For C, in CO  we find  km s (160 km s, peak to peak),  km s and  M (in CO  we find slightly higher values for and ).

3.8. Star formation in disks off the main sequence

For main-sequence galaxies, star formation is not confined to a compact starbursting nucleus (e.g. Elbaz et al., 2011); at , the specific SFR is approximately 2.8 Gyr. W and T have sSFRs of 14.2 and 14.7 Gyr, so their starburstiness,106 , placing them well above the main sequence. As we saw in §3.6 and §3.7 – their star formation is not centrally concentrated as would be the case in local starbursts. Instead, W and T are undergoing widespread star formation in disks that are supported partly by rotation, as envisaged for main-sequence galaxies, and share many of the properties of massive star-forming disks (e.g. Förster Schreiber et al., 2009). Some other factor – presumably their interaction – has taken them into the realm of sSFR reserved for starbursts.

For the parameter107 (Toomre, 1964; Goldreich & Lynden-Bell, 1965), which describes the stability of disks and which has been found to tend towards unity in stable situations (in models with and without feedback – Hopkins et al., 2012), we find values of for both W and T, with a plausible range that falls just short of unity. This suggests the disks are unstable and that the gas therein is prone to condense and form stars on a timescale shorter than the rotational period.

3.9. Gas properties and

The brightness temperature () ratios measured for both W and T are higher than expected (Table 2), where we usually see and for SMGs (Harris et al., 2010; Ivison et al., 2011; Bothwell et al., 2013), which suggests that the thermalised CO  filling factors may be close to unity and that we may have found similar sizes in CO  and  if our spatial resolution in the latter had been 2 higher.

For a CO to H+He conversion factor,  M (\kelvin km s pc), as commonly adopted for IR-luminous starbursts where the gas is not in virialized individual clouds (Bolatto et al., 2013), the gas masses we determine for W, T, C and M are 110, 83.7, 12.8 and  M (corrected for lensing).

If we were instead to adopt the all-sample average gas/dust mass ratio for nearby galaxies (/ = – Sandstrom et al., 2013), we would determine gas masses for W and T of 19.0 and  M, yielding gas/dust-motivated values of 1.4 and 1.1 M (\kelvin km s pc), respectively. Due to the uncertainty in , etc., we regard these as accurate to a factor at best. For an environment with sub-Solar metallicity, for example, would rise in line with /.

A dynamically-motivated estimate of can be made by determining the difference between the dynamical and stellar masses in each system, since this represents the total plausible mass of gas108. Via this method, we find = 0.6 and 0.3 M (\kelvin km s pc) for W and T, respectively, where the uncertainty,  dex, is due almost entirely to the notoriously difficult estimate of stellar mass (§3.4).

Finally, we can estimate using its relationship with gas-phase metallicity and CO surface brightness, as developed by Narayanan et al. (2012b), exploiting the resolved imaging in CO  acquired here. For Solar metallicity (Chapman et al., 2005) and the sizes that have been measured accurately in our JVLA imaging (§3.6; Table 2) we find = 0.8 and 0.7 M (\kelvin km s pc) for W and T, respectively.

Our mean is  M (\kelvin km s pc), in line with the value usually adopted for starburst galaxies, with a range similar to that reported by Downes & Solomon (1998), 0.3–1.3 M (\kelvin km s pc). To reconcile our dynamical measurement of with 3.2 M (\kelvin km s pc), which Genzel et al. (2010) argue is appropriate for all disks, regardless of redshift, would require a buried AGN to dominate the near-IR light, causing us to over-estimate .

Adopting our best estimate for , we find that W and T are both approaching the accepted criterion for maximal starbursts, with star-formation efficiencies, /, of 370 and 210 L M. C and M are higher still, though with considerable uncertainties. The Eddington limit is believed to be around 500 L M; above this level, the radiation pressure should quickly expel the gas via radiation pressure from young, massive stars on dust (Scoville, 2004).

Feedback due to the aforementioned radiation pressure will lengthen the total duration of star-formation episodes, or lead to a series of short bursts. Ignoring this, the gas-consumption timescale implied for the galaxies comprising HATLAS J084933 is /SFR 15–45 Myr, consistent with an interaction-driven period of enhanced star formation (Scoville, Sanders, & Clemens, 1986), as already hinted by the morphologically tortured state of C.

The stellar masses determined in §3.4 for W, T and C suggest gas fractions, –45%. These gas fractions are the top end of the range that Narayanan, Bothwell, & Davé (2012a) showed to be difficult to reconcile with cosmological simulations.

3.10. Relevance for star-formation laws

Data of the quality gathered here have the potential to test whether the rules and prescriptions developed to describe star formation in the local Universe (e.g. Schmidt, 1959; Kennicutt, 1989) can be applied to to the interstellar medium of distant, gas-rich starbursts like HATLAS J084933. Are the data consistent with a simple, volumetric star-formation law in which the SFR is 1% of the molecular gas mass per local free-fall time, as argued by Krumholz, Dekel, & McKee (2012)? Are their SFRs more closely related to the orbital periods of their entire galactic disks (e.g. Genzel et al., 2010; Daddi et al., 2010), or to the quantity of gas above some density threshold (e.g. Lada et al., 2010; Heiderman et al., 2010)?

We begin this discussion in the upper panel of Fig. 6: a luminosity-luminosity plot of the observables,  and , for low- and high-redshift star-forming galaxies (SFGs), e.g.  disks, LIRGs and ULIRGs and –2.5 BzK galaxies, taken from Genzel et al. (2010), and for SMGs. For this plot we need make no assumption about the appropriate value of . The quality and depth of our continuum and CO data mean that the errors bars for W and T can barely be discerned. Using measurements made only in CO , thereby avoiding the need to adopt a  ratio, alongside self-consistent measurements of , we find no compelling evidence that different relations apply to SMGs and other SFGs, in line with the findings of Ivison et al. (2011). Here, we use the sample of SFGs from Genzel et al. (2010) and find essentially the same result.

Figure 6.— Plots relating the rate or surface density of star formation with the available gas. Components W and T are shown as red squares, with error bars, in each plot. Circled red symbols denote high-redshift measurements made directly in CO . Low- and high-redshift star-forming galaxies (SFGs), e.g.  disks, LIRGs and ULIRGs and –2.5 BzK galaxies, are taken from Genzel et al. (2010) for all three plots. Top:  versus , where we find no compelling evidence that SMGs follow a different relation than the other star-forming galaxies. Middle: Surface-density S-K relation, where W and T lie amongst hyperluminous SMGs such as SMM J023990136 and GN 20, offset from the relation for other star-forming galaxies. Lower: Elmegreen-Silk relation between star-formation surface density and the ratio of gas surface density and dynamical timescale. W and T exhibit extreme star-formation efficiencies, even relative to SMGs. The fraction of their available gas converted into stars per dynamical timescale, , is .

It is noteworthy that while component T contributes most to or in all three observed CO transitions, component W is significantly brighter in the continuum at IR-through-radio wavelengths. We find a similar variation between W and T in relation to the far-IR/radio flux ratio, with  = and , respectively, spanning (and consistent with) the tight correlation for star-forming galaxies (, e.g. Yun et al., 2001). One might think their different line-to-continuum ratios would lead to a relatively large difference in their positions on the plot of  versus (Fig. 6, upper panel). In fact, W and T both lie comfortably amongst the scatter of SMGs, suggesting that this scatter may be intrinsic rather than due to measurement error.

Moving to the standard surface-density Schmidt-Kennicutt (S-K) relation, , shown as the middle panel of Fig. 6, it is now necessary to adopt value(s) for appropriate for SFGs and SMGs. Genzel et al. (2010) argue that 3.2 M (\kelvin km s pc) is appropriate for disks, regardless of redshift; our dynamical constraints preclude the adoption of this value for W and T. We use 3.2 and 0.8 M (\kelvin km s pc) for SFGs and SMGs, respectively, acknowledging that this is overly simplistic109 (e.g. Narayanan et al., 2012b). We find W and T nestled amongst the other SMGs again (Fig. 6), but this time the SMGs are offset110 significantly from the relation for other SFGs.

The lower panel of Fig. 6 shows the Elmegreen-Silk (E-S) relation between star-formation surface density and the ratio of gas surface density and dynamical timescale111. Taken at face value, W and T exhibit extreme star-formation efficiencies. Several other SMGs are equally extreme, converting % of their available gas into stars per dynamical timescale (). Krumholz et al. (2012) have argued in favour of a simple volumetric star-formation law, linking Galactic clouds, SMGs, and all scales between the two, with projection effects leading to the observed scatter. Here we have discovered two disks exhibiting star formation of such ferocity that they are capable of converting % of their molecular gas into stars with each rotation. We require a number of parameters to conspire together if we are to escape the conclusion that the gas in these disks does not obey the simple volumetric star-formation law proposed by Krumholz et al. (2012).

Before leaving the S-K and E-S laws, we note that although  is an effective tracer of in Eddington-limited star-forming disks, Ballantyne, Armour, & Indergaard (2013) have argued that velocity-integrated CO line intensity is a poor proxy for . Resolved observations of the mid-IR rotational lines of H may provide the ultimate probe of the star-formation relations in high-redshift disks, requiring a far-IR space interferometer such as FIRI (Helmich & Ivison, 2008).

3.11. Future evolution of the system

What does the HATLAS J084933 system look like in the present day?

The extreme starbursts that brought this galaxy to our attention via Herschel are likely to have been triggered by one or more interactions (Engel et al., 2010). Certainly, C is distorted, morphologically, and the distances between these galaxies are consistent with periods of intense star formation during merger simulations (e.g. Springel et al., 2005).

However, without knowledge of the dark-matter halo they inhabit and the transverse velocities of W, T, C and M, it is impossible to be sure whether these galaxies are gravitationally bound, let alone whether they will merge. We find that the total energy,  (km s), of each of these systems is negative – indicating that the galaxies are bound to one another – if their dynamical masses represent as little as 50% of the total. This is confirmed by -body simulations, starting from the observed velocities and positions on the sky, and assuming that the transverse velocities do not exceed those in the line of sight. If these galaxies inhabit an expected dark-matter halo of mass  M (e.g. Amblard et al., 2011; Hildebrandt et al., 2013), it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the system is bound.

Taking another approach, we searched the -Mpc Millenium Simulation at (Springel et al., 2005). In each friends-of-friends halo we identified all of the sub-halos, as well as the most massive sub-halo, which we take to be akin to W. We then computed the velocity and spatial offset between the most massive sub-halo and all the other sub-halos and tracked the cases where there are three sub-halos within a radius of 300 kpc (co-moving) with velocities , and  km s in projection (i.e. taking into account likely line-of-sight distances and transverse velocities). Those halos, typically  M at , end up with a median mass of  M in the present day (90% lower limit,  M) – structures that are thought to have a space density of a few  Mpc (e.g. Reiprich & Böhringer, 2002; Vikhlinin et al., 2009).

Figure 7.— versus CO  FWHM line widths for SMGs with redshifts, fluxes and magnifications from the literature (red squares – for details, see Harris et al., 2012, from whence this figure has been adapted). The power-law fit to these data represents an estimate of the intrinsic line luminosity versus line width relation for typical SMGs. Blue circles represent the lensed sample from Harris et al. (2012). The point for HATLAS J084933 has been replaced with those appropriate for components W and T. W has moved well within the scatter of the intrinsic relation, with a predicted amplification consistent with unity. The predicted amplification for T is consistent with the lens model presented in §3.2, .

The scale over which we see the galaxies comprising HATLAS J084933, 100 kpc, is similar to the core radius of rich clusters of galaxies, and the separation of W and T (in terms of kpc and km s) is typical of binary galaxies (e.g. Turner, 1976; Schweizer, 1987) and within a factor of the projected separation of the two dominant galaxies in the Coma cluster.112 We conclude that such systems can survive for a long time and are not necessarily in the process of merging. The four starbursts in HATLAS J084933 may instead be signposting a proto-cluster, where the majority of members are likely well below the detection thresholds of our panchromatic imaging. It is ironic that deliberate attempts to select clusters at submm wavelengths (targeting radio galaxies and quasars, for example – Stevens et al., 2003; De Breuck et al., 2004; Greve et al., 2007; Priddey et al., 2008) have met with only limited success, while serendipitous discoveries are becoming relatively commonplace (e.g. Riechers et al., 2010).

3.12. On the selection of HyLIRGs, and their rarity

Having resolved HATLAS J084933 into its constituent parts, if we place W and T individually on the Harris et al. plot of versus FWHM line width (Fig. 7) we find that W has moved further within the scatter of the intrinsic relation, with a predicted amplification close to unity. The predicted amplification for T, , is consistent with the lens model presented in §3.2.

We can estimate the space density of objects as rare as HATLAS J084933 by utilising the semi-empirical model of Hopkins et al. (2010) and Hayward et al. (2013). We start with halo mass functions and merger rates over the redshift range of interest derived from the Millenium Simulation (Springel et al., 2005), assigning galaxies to each halo following the abundance-matching techniques described in Conroy & Wechsler (2009) to yield the galaxy-galaxy merger rate as a function of mass, merger-mass ratio and redshift. Utilising the stellar mass functions of Marchesini et al. (2009), with extrapolations to higher redshifts following Fontana et al. (2006), we calculate the merger rate for all galaxies with a stellar mass ratio equal to or greater than that of W and T, with one component at least as massive as W. Integrating the merger rates between –6 ( Gyr), where we are sensitive to such events via H-ATLAS, results in a space density of approximately  Mpc, similar to the space density predicted for extreme HyLIRGs (Lapi et al., 2011, recall also §3.11). For the typical gas-consumption timescale found in §3.9, 15–45 Myr, we then expect to find 3–9 such galaxies in the 100 deg explored so far in H-ATLAS. The vast majority of bright Herschel galaxies have been shown to be lensed (Negrello et al., 2010), but the low end of this range is plausible. This suggests that the most luminous phase of these galaxies has a short duration,  Myr, and/or that such systems require some other rare property – counter-rotating disks being one possibility. Stellar mass functions at high redshift have significant uncertainties associated with them; nonetheless, this calculation emphasises the rarity of major mergers such as that between W and T and illustrates the efficiency of the method employed here to find extreme HyLIRGs. The observed surface density of these systems is such that even with short durations for their most luminous phases, they can end up as a subset of the massive current-day clusters discussed in §3.11.

HATLAS J084933 was selected on the basis of its broad CO line profile as a low-magnification, intrinsically luminous system, so it is ironic that its wide line profile is in part due to the multiple nature of the source and that future searches for single maximal-luminosity galaxies may require the selection of less extreme profiles. However, fundamentally we conclude that the method explored here for the selection of the most extreme starburst events in the Universe shows promise.

4. Conclusions

  1. Exploiting the relationship between CO luminosity and line width determined for unlensed starbursts, we have identified and removed gravitationally lensed sources from the brightest galaxies found in the widest extragalactic Herschel survey to yield a sample of intrinsically luminous galaxies. Here, we report deep panchromatic follow-up observations of the best candidate HyLIRG system, HATLAS J084933, with sub-arcsecond spectral and spatial resolution, which have led to the discovery of at least four starbursting galaxies across a 100-kpc region at , each with a significant mass of stars.

  2. The two brightest galaxies, W and T, are separated by 85 kpc on the sky. W suffers no gravitational amplification. T is marginally lensed by a foreground lenticular.

  3. The panchromatic SEDs of W and T reveal that both are associated with high-luminosity events – HyLIRGs. If contributions to  from AGN are small, and to date we have found no reason to suspect otherwise, then W and T have and 13.16,  = 36–40 \kelvin, and are generating 3400 and 1500 M yr of stars, respectively.

  4. Two other gas-rich galaxies, M and C, detected nearby, make HATLAS J084933 reminiscent of the first SMG found and the best-studied HyLIRG to date, SMM J023990136, which comprises a complex galactic nursery with three massive stellar components, each seen during a different evolutionary stage (Ferkinhoff et al., in preparation). The four galaxies known to comprise HATLAS J084933 are most likely bound. -body simulations and comparison with the Millenium Simulation suggest that in the present day the system may resemble a B(inary)-type cluster of mass,  M.

  5. Sub-arcsecond interferometric imaging reveals that the two brightest galaxies span 3 kpc FWHM in CO , and in submm and radio continuum, and roughly double that in CO . Alongside the detection of [C ii], this supports a scenario involving a widespread burst of intense star formation.

  6. Exquisite 3-D imaging from JVLA and IRAM PdBI reveal counter-rotating gas disks in W and T, a scenario that has long been predicted to lead to the most intense bursts of star formation. This suggests that similarly luminous galaxies will often be found in pairs. Their modest velocity dispersions mean that the disks are prone to instabilities on many scales, even that of the disks themselves; they are undergoing coherent, extreme starbursts, at close to the Eddington limit, which are not confined to their nuclei. Despite their disk-like morphologies and dynamics, their specific star-formation rates place them above the main sequence.

  7. W and T have CO line intensities and widths typical of the brightest SMGs, with slightly higher  ratios. Three independent estimates of the CO-to-H conversion factor – exploiting the dynamical mass, the mass of dust and a recent metallicity-dependent relation – suggest  M (\kelvin km s pc) and hence gas masses in W and T of  M. Their gas fractions, %, are difficult to reconcile with cosmological simulations.

  8. We have determined that the single-dish CO line profile of HATLAS J084933 is exceptionally broad because W and T have relatively wide lines, broadened further in the Harris et al. (2012) integrated GBT spectrum by the modest velocity offset between them, and by contributions from a number of faint CO clumps slightly redward of the two dominant components. We can thus reconcile the GBT CO line profile with that of the various galaxies found to comprise HATLAS J084933. These situations likely happen only rarely, even in the widest extragalactic Herschel surveys. We estimate that only a few systems of this nature will be found in every 100 deg surveyed.

  9. Placing W and T individually on the Harris et al. plot of versus FWHM CO line width, W and T move further within the scatter of the intrinsic relation, with a predicted amplification close to unity. We conclude that the method outlined here for the selection of extreme starbursts can indeed separate HyLIRGs from the more numerous, less luminous, strongly lensed population of IR-bright galaxies, and may also pinpoint some distant clusters of starbursting proto-ellipticals.

  10. Plotting  versus , W and T lie amongst the SMGs on a single relation that is consistent with all star-forming galaxies. They also lie amongst the SMGs on the classic Schmidt-Kennicutt and Elmegreen-Silk plots, but the SMGs now follow a relation that is distinct from those of other star-forming galaxies. Their star-formation efficiency is significantly higher, and is difficult to reconcile with a simple volumetric star-formation law in which 1% of the available gas is converted into stars during each local free-fall time.

Understanding systems as luminous as HATLAS J084933 represents a challenge. However, the observations presented here have shed considerable light on the characteristics that likely lead to the formation – however briefly – of the most luminous star-forming galaxies in the Universe. Observations scheduled for Cycle 1 with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array promise to reveal more about this dramatic and complex proto-galactic environment, probing the structure of the disks and sensitive to the presence and influence of buried AGN.


RJI acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) in the form of Advanced Grant, cosmicism. The Herschel-ATLAS is a project with Herschel, which is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA. The H-ATLAS website is www.h-atlas.org. US participants in H-ATLAS acknowledge support from NASA through a contract from JPL. IRS acknowledges support from STFC and ERC. MN and GdZ acknowledge financial support from ASI/INAF agreement I/072/09/0.

Facilities: CARMA, CSO, Herschel, Hubble Space Telescope, IRAM PdBI, JVLA, Keck, SMA, Spitzer, VISTA.


  1. affiliation: UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  2. affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  3. affiliation: Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
  4. affiliation: Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
  5. affiliation: Dept of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
  6. affiliation: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
  7. affiliation: Dept of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Irvine CA 92697
  8. affiliation: Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique, 300 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
  9. affiliation: Dept of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Irvine CA 92697
  10. affiliation: Dept of Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414
  11. affiliation: Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique, 300 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
  12. affiliation: Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
  13. affiliation: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, I-35122 Padova, Italy
  14. affiliation: Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique, 300 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France
  15. affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  16. affiliation: Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 9 Avenue Charles André, F-69561 Saint Genis Laval Cedex, France
  17. affiliation: Dept of Astronomy, Space Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6801
  18. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
  19. affiliation: The Henry A. Rowland Dept of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218
  20. affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  21. affiliation: Dept of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  22. affiliation: Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019
  23. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
  24. affiliation: Argelander-Institute for Astronomy, Bonn University, Auf dem Huegel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany
  25. affiliation: H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, UK
  26. affiliation: Dept of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Irvine CA 92697
  27. affiliation: Physics Dept, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  28. affiliation: Universität Wien, Institut für Astrophysik, A-1180 Wien, Austria
  29. affiliation: Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
  30. affiliation: SISSA, via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy
  31. affiliation: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, I-35122 Padova, Italy
  32. affiliation: Dept of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
  33. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queen’s Buildings, The Parade 5, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
  34. affiliation: Dept of Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, MC 0435, 910 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061
  35. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
  36. affiliation: Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita’ di Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
  37. affiliation: Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
  38. affiliation: Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  39. affiliation: Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
  40. affiliation: Physics Dept, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  41. affiliation: Dept of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  42. affiliation: UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  43. affiliation: Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile
  44. affiliation: Astrophysics, Dept of Physics, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
  45. affiliation: Dept of Physics, University of the Western Cape, South Africa
  46. affiliation: EPFL SB IPEP LASTRO, Observatoire Sauverny, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland
  47. affiliation: Dept of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
  48. affiliation: UPMC Univ. Paris 06 & CNRS UMR7095 IAP, F75014 Paris, France
  49. affiliation: Dept of Physics & Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z1, Canada
  50. affiliation: Dept of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  51. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queen’s Buildings, The Parade 5, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
  52. affiliation: Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
  53. affiliation: School of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queen’s Buildings, The Parade 5, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
  54. affiliation: European Space Astronomy Centre, Herschel Science Centre, ESA, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain
  55. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125
  56. affiliation: Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
  57. slugcomment: Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal
  58. Hereafter, CO refers to CO unless stated otherwise.
  59. This work is based on observations carried out with the JVLA. The NRAO is a facility of the NSF operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
  60. CARMA construction was derived from the states of Maryland, California and Illinois, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, the University of Chicago, the Associates of the California Institute of Technology, and the NSF. Ongoing CARMA development and operations are supported by the NSF under a cooperative agreement, and by the CARMA partner universities.
  61. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain).
  62. The SMA is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.
  63. This material is based upon work at the CSO, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation (AST-0838261).
  64. This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.
  65. Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with program 12488.
  66. Data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.
  67. Errors determined by placing many apertures across the map, with 3- and 5-% calibration uncertainties added in quadrature at 100 and 160 m, respectively.
  68. Errors determined by placing many apertures across the map, with 3- and 5-% calibration uncertainties added in quadrature at 100 and 160 m, respectively.
  69. Errors determined by placing many apertures across the map, with 3- and 5-% calibration uncertainties added in quadrature at 100 and 160 m, respectively.
  70. Errors determined by placing many apertures across the map, with 3- and 5-% calibration uncertainties added in quadrature at 100 and 160 m, respectively.
  71. Errors include the contribution due to confusion and a 7-% calibration uncertainty has been added in quadrature (Valiante et al., in preparation).
  72. Errors include the contribution due to confusion and a 7-% calibration uncertainty has been added in quadrature (Valiante et al., in preparation).
  73. Errors include the contribution due to confusion and a 7-% calibration uncertainty has been added in quadrature (Valiante et al., in preparation).
  74.  Corrected for .
  75.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  76.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  77.  Corrected for .
  78.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  79.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  80.  Corrected for .
  81.  Corrected for .
  82.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  83.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  84.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  85.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  86.  Corrected for .
  87.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  88.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  89.  Adopting as seen for CO.
  90.  Adopting as seen for CO.
  91.  Adopting as seen for CO.
  92.  Adopting as seen for CO.
  93.  Fixed.
  94.  Corrected for .
  95.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  96.  Insufficient S/N to make a useful measurement.
  97.  Corrected for .
  98.  Corrected for .
  99.  Corrected for .
  100.  Corrected for .
  101. Observations of higher- CO lines would be useful in terms of AGN diagnostics.
  102. Stellar mass estimates are generally robust to changes in SFH (e.g. Ilbert et al., 2010, 2013; Pforr et al., 2012).
  103. Note that the low-level GBT spectrometer baseline (at negative velocities relative to HATLAS J084933) may have caused an underestimate of .
  104. We use half-light radii to calculate the area appropriate for gas and star-formation surface densities, alongside a correction to the SFR or gas mass. We use FWHM simply as a convenient way to compare sizes in several wavebands.
  105. was taken to be twice the deconvolved half-light radius in CO .
  106. We cannot determine the starburst indicator (Elbaz et al., 2011) for HATLAS J084933 since we lack sufficiently deep rest-frame 8-m imaging.
  107. Usually ascribed to a seminal paper on the stability of stellar disks, Toomre (1964), which contains no mention of .
  108. Bearing in mind that any AGN contribution to the rest-frame near-IR luminosity will have led to an over-estimate of stellar mass.
  109. Changing by a factor two (in opposite directions) for the SFGs and SMGs would bring them in line with one another. Because of the potential for a large systematic error in measurements of stellar mass, amongst other things, we view such a change as plausible.
  110. Any change in the area used to calculate the gas or SFR surface density results in a point shifting parallel to the power-law relation seen in this plot.
  111. Although we have estimated the orbital timescale, in this calculation, we use the dynamical timescale of the disk, calculated using the half-light radius and the velocity dispersionm since Krumholz et al. (2012) show that use of the orbital time can artificially increase the apparent star-formation efficiency.
  112. Coma (Abell 1656) is a B(inary)-type cluster, with two bright, supergiant galaxies, NGC 4874 and NGC 4889, close to each other in the cluster core (Rood & Sastry, 1971).


  1. Alexander, D. M., Brandt, W. N., Smail, I., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1968
  2. Amblard, A., Cooray, A., Serra, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 470, 510
  3. Aravena, M., Younger, J. D., Fazio, G. G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, L15
  4. Ballantyne, D. R., Armour, J. N., & Indergaard, J. 2013, ApJ, 765, 138
  5. Bekki, K. 2001, ApJ, 546, 189
  6. Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, arXiv:1301.3498
  7. Borne, K. D., Bushouse, H., Lucas, R. A., & Colina, L. 2000, ApJ, 529, L77
  8. Bothwell, M. S., Smail, I., Chapman, S. C., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3047
  9. Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
  10. Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763
  11. Chapman, S. C., Blain, A., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. 2005, ApJ, 622, 772
  12. Conroy, C., & Wechsler, R. H. 2009, ApJ, 696, 620
  13. Courteau, S. 1997, AJ, 114, 2402
  14. da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1595
  15. Daddi, E., Elbaz, D., Walter, F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, L118
  16. De Breuck, C., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 1
  17. Di Matteo, P., Combes, F., Melchior, A.-L., & Semelin, B. 2007, A&A, 468, 61
  18. Dowell, C. D., Allen, C. A., Babu, R. S., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4855, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. T. G. Phillips & J. Zmuidzinas, 73–87
  19. Downes, D., & Solomon, P. M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615
  20. Dunne, L., Eales, S., Edmunds, M., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 115
  21. Dunne, L., & Eales, S. A. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 697
  22. Dwek, E., Staguhn, J. G., Arendt, R. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 738, 36
  23. Eales, S., Dunne, L., Clements, D., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 499
  24. Elbaz, D., Dickinson, M., Hwang, H. S., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A119
  25. Emerson, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. 2010, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol. 7733
  26. Engel, H., Tacconi, L. J., Davies, R. I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 233
  27. Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10
  28. Fontana, A., Salimbeni, S., Grazian, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 459, 745
  29. Förster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1364
  30. Frayer, D. T., Harris, A. I., Baker, A. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, L22
  31. Gear, W. K., Lilly, S. J., Stevens, J. A., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 316, L51
  32. Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2091
  33. Goldreich, P., & Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 97
  34. Greve, T. R., Stern, D., Ivison, R. J., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 48
  35. Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3+
  36. Hainline, L. J., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 96
  37. Harris, A. I., Baker, A. J., Zonak, S. G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1139
  38. Harris, A. I., Baker, A. J., Frayer, D. T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 152
  39. Hayward, C. C., Kereš, D., Jonsson, P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 159
  40. Hayward, C. C., Narayanan, D., Kereš, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2529
  41. Heiderman, A., Evans, II, N. J., Allen, L. E., Huard, T., & Heyer, M. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1019
  42. Helmich, F. P., & Ivison, R. J. 2008, Experimental Astronomy, 15
  43. Helou, G., Soifer, B. T., & Rowan-Robinson, M. 1985, ApJ, 298, L7
  44. Hildebrandt, H., van Waerbeke, L., Scott, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 488
  45. Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3488
  46. Hopkins, P. F., Younger, J. D., Hayward, C. C., Narayanan, D., & Hernquist, L. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1693
  47. Ibar, E., Ivison, R. J., Best, P. N., et al. 2010a, MNRAS, 401, L53
  48. Ibar, E., Ivison, R. J., Cava, A., et al. 2010b, MNRAS, 409, 38
  49. Ilbert, O., Salvato, M., Le Floc’h, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 644
  50. Ilbert, O., McCracken, H. J., Le Fevre, O., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1301.3157
  51. Iono, D., Peck, A. B., Pope, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, L1
  52. Ivison, R. J., Papadopoulos, P. P., Smail, I., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1913
  53. Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1989, ApJ, 344, 685
  54. —. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541
  55. Klaas, U., Nielbock, M., Haas, M., Krause, O., & Schreiber, J. 2010, A&A, 518, L44
  56. Kovács, A. 2008, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol. 7020
  57. Kovács, A., Omont, A., Beelen, A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 29
  58. Krumholz, M. R., Dekel, A., & McKee, C. F. 2012, ApJ, 745, 69
  59. Lada, C. J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. F. 2010, ApJ, 724, 687
  60. Lapi, A., González-Nuevo, J., Fan, L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 24
  61. Leong, M., Peng, R., Houde, M., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6275, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series
  62. Lutz, D., Dunlop, J. S., Almaini, O., et al. 2001, A&A, 378, 70
  63. Magnelli, B., Lutz, D., Santini, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A155
  64. Makovoz, D., & Marleau, F. R. 2005, PASP, 117, 1113
  65. Marchesini, D., van Dokkum, P. G., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1765
  66. Michalowski, M. J., Dunlop, J. S., Cirasuolo, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A85
  67. Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ, 431, L9
  68. —. 1996, ApJ, 464, 641
  69. Morton, D. C., & Noreau, L. 1994, ApJS, 95, 301
  70. Narayanan, D., Bothwell, M., & Davé, R. 2012a, MNRAS, 426, 1178
  71. Narayanan, D., Krumholz, M. R., Ostriker, E. C., & Hernquist, L. 2012b, MNRAS, 421, 3127
  72. Negrello, M., González-Nuevo, J., Magliocchetti, M., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 869
  73. Negrello, M., Hopwood, R., De Zotti, G., et al. 2010, Science, 330, 800
  74. Owen, F. N., & Morrison, G. E. 2008, AJ, 136, 1889
  75. Pascale, E., Auld, R., Dariush, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 911
  76. Pforr, J., Maraston, C., & Tonini, C. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3285
  77. Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1+
  78. Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L2+
  79. Pope, A., Borys, C., Scott, D., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 149
  80. Priddey, R. S., Ivison, R. J., & Isaak, K. G. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 289
  81. Reiprich, T. H., & Böhringer, H. 2002, ApJ, 567, 716
  82. Riechers, D. A., Hodge, J., Walter, F., Carilli, C. L., & Bertoldi, F. 2011, ApJ, 739, L31
  83. Riechers, D. A., Capak, P. L., Carilli, C. L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, L131
  84. Rigby, E. E., Maddox, S. J., Dunne, L., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2336
  85. Rood, H. J., & Sastry, G. N. 1971, PASP, 83, 313
  86. Rowlands, K., Dunne, L., Maddox, S., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2545
  87. Salomé, P., Guélin, M., Downes, D., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A57
  88. Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, arXiv:1212.1208
  89. Schmidt, M. 1959, ApJ, 129, 243
  90. Schweizer, L. Y. 1987, ApJS, 64, 411
  91. Scoville, N. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 320, The Neutral ISM in Starburst Galaxies, ed. S. Aalto, S. Huttemeister, & A. Pedlar, 253
  92. Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., & Clemens, D. P. 1986, ApJ, 310, L77
  93. Smolčić, V., Aravena, M., Navarrete, F., et al. 2012a, A&A, 548, A4
  94. Smolčić, V., Navarrete, F., Aravena, M., et al. 2012b, ApJS, 200, 10
  95. Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., et al. 2005, Nature, 435, 629
  96. Stacey, G. J., Hailey-Dunsheath, S., Ferkinhoff, C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 957
  97. Stevens, J. A., Ivison, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2003, Nature, 425, 264
  98. Swinbank, A. M., Smail, I., Longmore, S., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 733
  99. Taniguchi, Y., & Shioya, Y. 1998, ApJ, 501, L167
  100. Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217
  101. Turner, E. L. 1976, ApJ, 208, 20
  102. Vikhlinin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Burenin, R. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1060
  103. Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L. L., van Saders, J., Barger, A. J., & Williams, J. P. 2007, ApJ, 670, L89
  104. Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
  105. Whitmore, B. C., & Schweizer, F. 1995, AJ, 109, 960
  106. Wilson, C. D., Petitpas, G. R., Iono, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 189
  107. Younger, J. D., Fazio, G. G., Huang, J.-S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1531
  108. Younger, J. D., Fazio, G. G., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 59
  109. Younger, J. D., Fazio, G. G., Huang, J.-S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 803
  110. Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., & Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803