Have Cherenkov telescopes detected a new light boson?

Have Cherenkov telescopes detected a new light boson?

Marco Roncadelli INFN, Sezione di Pavia, via A. Bassi 6, I – 27100 Pavia, Italy marco.roncadelli@pv.infn.it    Alessandro De Angelis Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, I – 33100 Udine,
and INAF and INFN, Sezioni di Trieste, Italy
   Oriana Mansutti Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, I – 33100 Udine,
and INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Italy

Recent observations by H.E.S.S. and MAGIC strongly suggest that the Universe is more transparent to very-high-energy gamma rays than previously thought. We show that this fact can be reconciled with standard blazar emission models provided that photon oscillations into a very light Axion-Like Particle occur in extragalactic magnetic fields. A quantitative estimate of this effect indeed explains the observed data and in particular the spectrum of blazar 3C279.

1 Introduction

So far, Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) have detected about 30 very-high-energy (VHE) blazars above over distances ranging from the parsec scale for Galactic objects up to the Gigaparsec scale for extragalactic ones. By now, the fartest blazar observed by IACTs is 3C279 at redshift detected by MAGIC. Given that these sources extend over a wide range of distances, not only can their intrinsic properties be inferred but also photon propagation over cosmological distances can be probed. This is particularly intriguing because VHE photons from distant sources scatter off soft background photons, thereby disappearing into pairs. Since the cross section peaks where the VHE photon energy and the background photon energy are related by , the horizon of the observable VHE Universe rapidly shrinks above due to the presence of the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) produced by galaxies during the whole cosmic history. In the presence of such an energy-dependent opacity, photon propagation is controlled by the photon mean free path for , and so the observed photon spectrum is related to the emitted one by


It turns out that decreases like a power law from the Hubble radius around to nearly around  [1]. Thus, Eq. (1) implies that the observed flux is exponentially suppressed both at high energies and at large distances, so that sufficiently far-away sources become hardly visible in the VHE range and their observed spectrum should be much steeper than the emitted one.

Yet, the behaviour predicted by Eq. (1) has not been detected by observations. A first indication in this direction was reported by the H.E.S.S. collaboration in connection with the discovery of the two blazars H2356-309 () and 1ES1101-232 () at  [2]. Stronger evidence comes from the observation of blazar 3C279 () at by the MAGIC collaboration [3]. In particular, the signal from 3C279 collected by MAGIC in the region GeV has more or less the same statistical significance as the one in the range 220 GeV 600 GeV ( in the former case, in the latter).

We argue that this circumstance strongly hints at the existence of a very light Axion-like particle (ALP), which is indeed predicted by many extensions of the Standard Model, including compactified Kaluza-Klein theories as well as in superstring theories [4].

2 DARMA scenario

Our proposal – to be referred to as the DARMA scenario – can be sketched as follows [5]. Because ALPs are characterized by a coupling to two photons, in the presence of an external magnetic field the interaction eigenstates differ from the propagation eigenstates, so that photon-ALP oscillations show up (much in the same way as it happens for massive neutrinos). Photons are supposed to be emitted by a blazar in the usual way. In the presence of extragalactic magnetic fields – whose existence is strongly suggested by AUGER observations [6] – some of them can turn into ALPs. Further, some of the produced ALPs can convert back into photons and ultimately be detected. In free space this would obviously produce a flux dimming. Remarkably enough, because of the EBL such a double conversion can make the observed flux considerably larger than in the standard situation! This is due to the fact that ALPs do not undergo EBL absorption. As a consequence, the observed photons travel a distance in excess of and Eq. (1) becomes


which shows that even a small increase of gives rise to a large enhancement of the observed flux. It turns out that the DARMA mechanism makes shallower than although it remains a decreasing function of . So, the resulting observed spectrum is much harder than the one predicted by Eq. (1), thereby ensuring agreement with observations even for a standard emission spectrum. As a bonus, we get a natural explanation for the fact that only the most distant blazars would demand to substantially depart from the emission spectrum predicted by the standard mechanism.

3 Predicted energy spectrum

Even though the existence of extragalactic magnetic fields has been strongly suggested by AUGER observations [6], their morphology is largely unknown. So, it is usually supposed that they have a domain-like structure. It looks plausible to assume that and that their coherence length is in the range  [7].

We evaluate of the probability that a photon remains a photon after propagation from the source to us when allowance is made for photon-ALP oscillations as well as for photon absorption from the EBL, so that Eq. (2) gets replaced by


Our procedure is as follows. We first solve exactly the beam propagation equation over a single magnetic domain, assuming that the EBL is described by the “best-fit model” of Kneiske et al. [8]. Starting with an unpolarized photon beam, we next propagate it by iterating the single-domain solution as many times as the number of domains crossed by the beam, taking each time a random value for the angle between and a fixed overall fiducial direction. We repeat such a procedure times and finally we average over all these realizations of the propagation process.

As far as 3C279 is concerned, we find that about 13% of the photons arrive to the Earth for , representing an enhancement by a factor of about 20 with respect to the expected flux without DARMA mechanism (the comparison is made with the above “best-fit model”). The same calculation gives a fraction of 76% for (to be compared to 67% without DARMA mechanism) and a fraction of 3.4% for (to be compared to 0.0045% without DARMA mechanism). The resulting spectrum is exhibited in Fig. 1. These conclusions hold for ALPs lighter than and for their two-photon coupling within the experimentally allowed range [5].

Figure 1: The two lowest lines give the fraction of photons surviving from 3C279 without the DARMA mechanism within the “best-fit model” of EBL (dashed line) and for the minimum EBL density compatible with cosmology (dashed-dotted line). The solid line represents the prediction of the DARMA scenario for and and the gray band is the envelope of the results obtained by independently varying and within a factor of 10 about such values.



  • [1] Coppi P and Aharonian F 1997 Astrophys. J. 487 L9
  • [2] Aharonian F et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration) 2006 Nature 440 1018
  • [3] Albert J et al. (MAGIC Collaboration) 2008 Science 320 1752
  • [4] Arvanitaki A et al. 2009 String Axiverse Preprint arXiv:0905.4720
  • [5] De Angelis A, Roncadelli M and Mansutti O 2007 Phys. Rev. D 76 121301
  • [6] Abraham J et al. [Pierre Auger Collaboration] 2007 Science 318 939
  • [7] De Angelis A, Persic M and Roncadelli M 2008 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 315
  • [8] Kneiske T M, Bretz T, Mannheim K and Hartmann D H 2004 Astron. Astrophys. 413 807
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description