Giant Uniaxial Anisotropy in the Magnetic and Transport Properties of CePd{}_{5}Al{}_{2}

Giant Uniaxial Anisotropy in the Magnetic and Transport Properties of CePdAl

Takahiro Onimaru E-mail address: onimaru@hiroshima-u.ac.jp    Yukihiro F. Inoue    Keisuke Shigetoh    Kazunori Umeo   
Hirokazu Kubo
   Raquel A. Ribeiro    Akihiro Ishida    Marcos A. Avila   
Kenji Ohoyama
   Masafumi Sera and Toshiro Takabatake
\abst

Electrical resistivity , magnetic susceptibility , magnetization and specific heat measurements are reported on a singlecrystalline sample of CePdAl, showing successive antiferromagnetic orderings at =4.1 K and 2.9 K. The temperature dependence of shows a Kondo metal behavior with large anisotropy, 3.2 at 20 K, and opening of a superzone gap along the tetragonal c-direction below . Both and gradually increase with applying pressure up to 2.5 GPa. The data of and () in the paramagnetic state were analyzed using a crystalline electric field (CEF) model. It led to a Kramers doublet ground state with wave functions consisting primarily of , whose energy level is isolated from the excited states by 230 and 300 K. This CEF effect gives rise to the large anisotropy in the paramagnetic state. In the ordered state, the uniaxial magnetic anisotropy is manifested as 20 in 5 T and at 1.9 K, and /25 in 0.1 T and at 4 K. This huge uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in the antiferromagnetic states can be interpreted in terms of isotropic magnetic interaction among the Ce moments governed by the strong CEF. In powder neutron diffraction experiments, magnetic reflections were observed owing to the antiferromagnetic ordered states below , however, no additional reflection was found below . \kwordCePdAl, Uniaxial anisotropy, Crystal electric field, Superzone gap, Kondo lattice, Neutron diffraction

1 Introduction

Recently there has been considerable interest in the rare-earth- and actinide-based ternary intermetallic compounds, since they have been found to have various types of ground states such as magnetic long-range order, Kondo lattice, heavy fermion state, multipole order, superconductivity, etc. In particular, the ternary R-Pd-Al (R: rare-earth or actinide) system has attracted much attention, because it includes many exotic compounds exhibiting attractive properties. For instance, UPdAl crystallizing in the hexagonal PrNiAl-type structure exhibits superconductivity at 2 K and antiferromagnetic (AF) ordering at 14 K, both coexisting in the ground state.[1] CePdAl, isostructural to UPdAl, does not show superconductivity but does show AF transition at 2.8 K.[2] The magnetic ground state can be easily controlled by applying pressure[3] or substituting the Pd site with other elements such as Ni[4], Cu[5] and Ag[6]. Thereby, the hybridization of the 4 electron state near the Fermi level with bands is changed. Moreover, the ground state of CePdAl depends on quality of samples, for example, the AF ordering emerges in a polycrystal, whereas no phase transition is found in a single crystal.[7, 8, 9, 10] Another example is CePdAl which crystallizes in the ZrNiAl-type hexagonal structure, where Ce ions form a quasi-Kagome lattice on the basal plane. CePdAl undergoes an AF ordering at 2.7 K,[11, 12, 13] whose magnetic structure is strongly influenced by the magnetic frustration effect.[14]

Very recently, the first neptunium-based superconductor NpPdAl with 4.9 K was discovered by Aoki et al.[15] This compound crystallizes in the tetragonal ZrNiAl-type structure of the space group 4/. Subsequently, Ribeiro et al. have reported the synthesis and physical properties of an isostructual cerium-based compound CePdAl[16], which is a new compound in the ternary R-Pd-Al family. The polycrystalline sample already shows a high degree of c-axis preferred orientation. Accordingly, the electrical resistivity () exhibits an anisotropic behavior as 1.8 at 300 K, where and are those for the current directions perpendicular and parallel to the grain length, respectively. At temperatures ranging from 10 K to 4 K, it shows ln dependence as is seen in Kondo lattice compounds. Furthermore, drops at 3.9 K and bends at 2.9 K. Because two transitions were also observed in the magnetic susceptibility and specific heat (), they were ascribed to AF transitions. The effective magnetic moment of 2.532.56 /f.u. indicated that the Ce ion should be trivalent. In the field dependence of the magnetization () at 1.8 K, a metamagnetic behavior appears at 0.9 T only in the magnetic fields perpendicular to the grain length. The total entropy estimated from the temperature dependence of the specific heat reaches 80% of ln2 at , suggesting that a Kramers doublet in the CEF ground state should be responsible to the magnetic transitions. From a linear extrapolation of / versus plot between 20 K and 8 K, the electronic specific heat coefficient was estimated to be 60 mJ/mol K, indicating that CePdAl may be classified as a strongly correlated electron system with moderate mass enhancement.

These macroscopic measurements on the polycrystalline sample suggested the strong magnetic and transport anisotropy in CePdAl. However, they do not allow detailed conclusion on the relation between the anisotropy and the crystal directions. In aiming at establishing the origin of the anisotropy, we have grown singlecrystalline CePdAl and measured (), () and () along the a- and c-axes. In Ce-based compounds as well as other rare-earth compounds, the CEF effects are important for the magnetic anisotropy. We analyzed the magnetic data using the CEF model, which allowed us to determine the CEF level scheme and the 4 wave functions. In order to determine the magnetic structure, neutron diffraction experiments were done on a powdered sample.

2 Experimental Details

2.1 Single crystal growth and characterization

A singlecrystalline sample of CePdAl was grown by the Czochralski method using a high frequency furnace.[17] Staring elements were 4N Ce prepared by the Ames Laboratory, 4N Pd and 5N Al. A mixture of these elements was melt and homogenized in a water-cooled Hukin-type crucible. A tungsten rod was used as a virtual seed, which was immersed to the molten sample in a hot tungsten crucible. The rod was pulled at a speed of about 8 mm/h in a purified Ar atmosphere. The obtained crystal of 60 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter was characterized by electron-probe microanalysis (EPMA), where no secondary phase was found and compositions were 1.00(1):5.00(1):1.98(1). The lattice parameters at room temperature were refined to be 4.1666(3) and 14.942(2) by the Rietveld analysis of the powder X-ray diffraction patterns using the program RIETAN-2000.[18] The orientation of the singlecrystalline sample was determined by the back Laue method using an imaging plate camera, IPXC/B (TRY-SE).

Polycrystalline samples of CePdAl and YPdAl were prepared by a conventional argon arc technique. For ensuring homogeneity, each ingot was turned over and remelted several times. The samples were sealed in an evacuated quartz tube and annealed at 800 C for 7 days. The and parameters of YPdAl were 4.1214(3) and 14.822(1) , respectively.

2.2 Measurements

Electrical resistance was measured under ambient pressure as well as applied pressures up to 2.5 GPa by a standard four-probe AC method in home-built systems. A He refrigerator and Gifford-McMahon type refrigerator were used, respectively, in the temperature ranges 0.3-200 K and 3-380 K. The pressure was generated by a clamp-type piston-cylinder pressure cell by using Daphne oil as pressure transmitting medium. The pressure was determined by the change in superconducting transition temperature of Sn. Specific heat was measured by a relaxation method using a commercial calorimeter (Quantum Design PPMS) at temperatures between 0.4 K and 300 K. Magnetization was measured using a commercial SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS) for 1.9-350 K and in magnetic fields up to 5 T. A sample-extraction magnetometer was also used to extend the magnetic field range up to 14.5 T. To perform magnetization measurements at low temperatures down to 0.35 K, we adopted a capacitive Faraday method using a high-resolution capacitive force-sensing device installed in a He refrigerator.[20] Magnetic fields up to 9.5 T and field gradient of 10 T/m were applied independently by a superconducting magnet with built-in gradient coils.

Powder neutron diffraction experiments were performed using the high efficiency and resolution powder diffractometer, HERMES, of Institute for Materials Research (IMR), Tohoku University, installed at the JRR-3M reactor in Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai.[19] Neutrons with a wave length of 1.82646(6) were obtained by the 331 Bragg reflection of a deformed singlecrystalline Ge monochromator, and 12-blank-sample-27 collimation. Sample powders were sealed in a 14.5mm cylindrical vanadium capsule in a standard aluminum cell with helium gas. The sample cell was mounted at the cold head of an Orange cryostat and cooled down to 1.3 K.

Figure 1: (a) Temperature dependence of specific heat of the singlecrystalline CePdAl (œ) and the polycrystal (›).[16] Two anomalies appear at 4.1 K () and 2.9 K (). The inset shows vs plot. The electronic specific heat coefficient is estimated as 18 mJ/mol K by adopting the relation , which represents an antiferromagnteic magnon spectrum with a spin-wave energy gap . (b) The temperature dependence of and the magnetic entropy . At , reaches 0.9ln2.
Figure 2: (a) Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility in a magnetic field of 0.1 T applied along the c- and a-axes. At 4 K, (left-hand scale) is 25 times as large as (right-hand scale), which means large uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in this system. shows a cusp at and a broad shoulder at , whereas shows a broad shoulder at and a cusp at . (b) Temperature dependence of inverse magnetic susceptibility in a magnetic field of 1 T applied along the c- and a-axes. Above 200 K, both and show the Curie-Weiss behavior. A significant difference in the paramagnetic Curie temperature and a broad shoulder in around 50 K are due to the crystal electric field effect described in the text.

3 Results

3.1 Specific heat

Temperature dependence of the specific heat () of the singlecrystalline sample (closed circles) is compared with that of the polycrystal (open circles)[16] in Fig. 1(a). The distinct peaks at 4.1 K and 2.9 K in the data of single crystal are much sharper than in the polycrystal. These temperatures are taken as and because the peaks are the manifestation of successive magnetic transitions. The magnetic specific heat is evaluated by subtracting () of the polycrystalline YPdAl as the phonon contribution. By integrating , the magnetic entropy was evaluated and plotted in Fig. 1(b). At , reaches 0.9ln2, confirming that the CEF ground state should be a Kramers doublet. It also means that the Kramers doublet is not so strongly affected by the Kondo effect and magnetically orders at and . Therefore, other degrees of freedom than the magnetic moments, for example, quadrupoles, are not involved in the transitions. Upon decreasing temperature below the AF transition temperatures, we expect the magnetic specific heat to follow the relation of , where and are the coefficients of an electronic and an AF magnon terms, respectively. However, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(a), there is no linearity in vs . This discrepancy should arise from an AF magnon with a gap in the excitation spectrum due to anisotropy. As will be shown in the next subsection, in CePdAl, strong uniaxial anisotropy was found. Therefore, has an activation term, ie., , where is a spin-wave energy gap.[21] Altogether, the fit to the data below 1 K is shown with the solid curve in the inset of Fig. 1(a), which yields 18 mJ/mol K and 0.15 meV. The rather low value suggests the localized nature of the 4 electrons in the ground state.

3.2 Magnetic susceptibility and magnetization

Figure 2(a) shows the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility in a field of 0.1 T applied along the c- and a-directionss. Note the different scale for (left-hand scale) and (right-hand scale). Strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy is manifested in the large ratio /25 at . Interestingly, shows a sharp cusp at and a small knee at , whereas shows a small knee at and a cusp at . Figure 2(b) shows the temperature variation of and measured in a field of 1 T. Above 200 K, both and are linear in as is expected from the Curie-Weiss law. From the slope, the effective magnetic moment is estimated as 2.8 Ce-ion in both directions, whose value is close to 2.54 expected for a trivalent Ce-ion. The paramagnetic Curie temperatures are 37.8 and -159 K for Bc and Ba, respectively. As temperature decreases, deviates from the Curie-Weiss law and passes through a broad shoulder at 50 K. The shoulder and the large difference in ’s should result from the CEF effect. We will present the results of the analysis using the CEF model afterwards.

Figure 3: Isothermal magnetization in magnetic field applied along the c- and a-axes. Four anomalies at 1.4, 1.6, 2.8 and 4.2 T appear at 1.9 K (), whereas one anomaly at 1.5 T appears at 3.5 K (). No anomaly appears in (Ba). The ratio (Bc)(Ba) is as large as 20, indicating the strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. The inset shows (Bc) in magnetic field up to 14.5 T at 1.5 K (sample extraction method) and 9.5 T at 0.3 K (capacitance Faraday method). The data at 0.3 K is vertically shifted for clarity. The broken lines show the value of 2.04 /Ce expected from the CEF scheme.

Figure 3 shows the magnetization isotherms up to 5 T for Bc and Ba. At 1.9 K (), () (open circles) exhibits four features at 1.3, 1.5, 2.7 and 4.2 T, followed by a slow approach to saturation of 2.0 /Ce at 14.5 T. (see in the inset of Fig. 3) The saturation value is consistent with 2.04 /Ce (broken line) which is expected from the CEF level scheme as is illustrated in Fig. 8. At 3.5 K (), (open triangles) exhibits a small anomaly only at 1.5 T. At 10 K (), (open squires) increases monotonically with increasing magnetic fields. at 0.3 K measured by the capacitance Faraday method is also shown in the inset of Fig. 3. It starts increasing linearly with increasing magnetic field, followed by a rapid rise at 1.0 T. Further, it exhibits an almost linear increase with increasing magnetic field above and reaches the saturation value of 2.0 /Ce at 4.9 T with a sharp knee. No apparent feature other than and could be detected because of variation of the magnetization data. Apparently, and correspond to the critical fields of 1.3 and 4.2 T at 1.9 K, respectively, furthermore, the slope in the mediate range between and is temperature independent. Note that the extrapolation of from the mediate range goes to 0, suggesting that a magnetic structure above should be different from that below . By contrast, reaches only 0.1 Ce even at 5 T and 1.9 K. The large ratio 20 means that strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy survives in the AF ordered state.

Figure 4: (a) Temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity of a singlecrystalline CePdAl sample for current directions Ic and Ia. The broken line shows that of a polycrystalline YPdAl sample. (b) Electrical resistivity for Ic (left-hand scale) and Ia (right-hand scale) vs ln. The thick arrows indicate the transition temperatures. Between 6 K and 16 K, they obey ln which results from the Kondo effect. The () for Ic jumps at and suddenly drops at with decreasing temperatures. On the other hand, for Ia bends at both and . The bold solid curve is for Ic estimated by Eq. (5) using the present data and some parameters. See text for details. The inset shows the plot of ln vs 1. The linear dependence gives the gap value of 0.28 meV for the superzone gap.

3.3 Electrical resistivity

Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the temperature variations of the electrical resistivity of the singlecrystalline CePdAl for current directions Ia and Ic and that of the polycrystalline YPdAl. Both () and () decrease in parallel with decreasing temperatures down to 50 K. Thereby, the ration / increases from 1.4 at 300 K to 3.2 at 20 K. As is shown in Fig. 4(b), () and () obey ln dependence from 16 K to 6 K, which is a characteristic of the Kondo lattice compound. The slope is also anisotropic, 0.43 and 0.10 for Ic and Ia, respectively. On cooling below 5 K, jumps at 4.1 K, peaks near 3.7 K, and bends at 2.9 K. The origin of the jump in () below will be discussed later. On the other hand, shows knees at and followed by a leveling at 1.6 cm. The residual resistivity ratio (RRR) estimated from (300 K)(0.3 K) is 15 and 6 for Ia and Ic, respectively.

Pressure dependence of (T) of polycrystalline CePdAl is represented in Fig. 5. The drop at and the kink at in the (T) are indicated by the arrows at the cross-point of the two lines above and below the anomalies. With increasing pressure up to 2.5 GPa, both and shift to higher temperatures as is shown in the inset of Fig. 5. This fact suggests that CePdAl lies on the left-hand side of the gbell curveh in the Doniach phase diagram[22] in which side the Kondo interaction is overwhelmed by the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction. It is certainly necessary to apply pressures above 3 GPa in order to search for the quantum critical behavior in this system.

Figure 5: Low temperature resistivity of a polycrystalline CePdAl sample under various pressures up to 2.5 GPa. The inset shows the pressure dependence of the ordering temperatures and .

3.4 Neutron diffraction experiment

Figure 6(a) shows the powder neutron diffraction patterns of CePdAl at the various temperatures 1.4, 3.3 and 5.5 K, corresponding to , and , respectively. The patterns at 1.4 K and 3.3 K are vertically offset by 1000 and 2000 counts, respectively, for clarity. At 5.5 K, all the peaks can be indexed as nuclear Bragg peaks of the tetragonal ZrNiAl-type structure. No secondary phase was found in the patterns being consistent with the X-ray diffraction analysis. Although the intensities of the nuclear peaks do not change between 5.5 K and 1.4 K, weak superlattice Bragg peaks appear at 3.3 K and 1.4 K at the scattering angles 28.1 and 21.7, which are shown with the thick arrows. The low angle patterns are expanded in Fig. 6(b) to highlight the peaks labeled gMagh which manifest themselves at 3.3 K. Their intensities increase with decreasing temperature to 1.4 K while other Bragg peaks are unchanged. The integrated intensity of the superlattice Bragg peak at 8.1 corresponding to Q=0.48 is plotted as a function of temperature in Fig. 7. On cooling, the intensity starts to increase at 4 K, which is in good agreement with determined by the macroscopic measurements. Thus the superlattice peaks originate in the magnetic transition at . Since no apparent anomaly exists at , a propagation vector of magnetic structures should not change so much at , which hints to a possible magnetic structure. From the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility shown in Fig. 2(a), one possibility is canting of the magnetic moments from the c-direction. The other is square-up of a modulated sine-wave structure with appearance of higher order reflections, because the change of the magnetic entropy at is very large as is seen in the specific heat. However, no sign of the higher order reflections was observed in the present experiments. This is probably because the intensity was too weak to detect by means of the powder neutron diffraction technique.

Figure 6: (a) Powder neutron diffraction patterns at 1.4 K (), 3.3 K () and 5.5 K (). Each pattern is vertically offset for clarify. The thick arrows show magnetic reflections which appear below . (b) The diffraction patterns expanded into the range 060 . The dotted lines show peak positions of magnetic reflections denoted as Mag.
Figure 7: Temperature dependence of integrated intensity of the magnetic peak at 28.1 corresponding to Q0.48 . The solid line is a guide to the eyes. The broken line indicates the background intensity. The intensity of the magnetic reflection appears below . It increases with decreasing temperatures and saturates at 2.6 K. No apparent change is found at around .

4 Discussion

4.1 CEF analysis

We first analyze the data of and () in the paramagnetic state by using the CEF model. The local symmetry surrounding the Ce ions in CePdAl is represented by the crystallographic point group of , hence, the CEF Hamiltonian can be written as

(1)

where and stand for the CEF parameters and the Stevens operators, respectively.[23] The above Hamiltonian splits a multiplet of Ce with into three Kramers doublets. In the mean-field approximation, temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility () () is expressed as

(2)

where is the mean-field parameter representing the exchange interaction among Ce magnetic moments. The CEF contribution to the magnetic susceptibility, (), is given by

(3)

where the Land factor is 6/7 for Ce, is the -component of the angular momentum, and are eigenstates of 4 wave functions, and is the eigenvalue of the derived CEF level. The CEF contribution to the magnetization, , is given by

(4)

A least-square fit to the data was done by setting the second order CEF parameter to be 20.5 K as an initial value, which was estimated from the difference between (Ic) and (Ia). The determined CEF parameters and are listed in Table I. By using these parameters, and are calculated and drawn by solid curves in Fig. 2(b). It should be noted that they agree well with the data in the paramagnetic state. Furthermore, the calculated curves () are drawn by solid curves in Fig. 3. At 10 K, the larger values than the experimental data may result from either AF correlation between the Ce ions even in the paramagnetic state or suppression of the magnetic moments due to the Kondo effect. Figure 8 shows the CEF energy level scheme and the wave functions. The first and second excited levels lie at 230 and 300 K above the ground state whose wave function consists primarily of as shown in Table 1. The large uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in the paramagnetic state should originate from the isolated CEF ground state. Moreover, the pancake-like spatial distribution of the wave functions supports the magnetic moments to orient along the c-axis.

CEF (K) (mol/emu)
parameters -16.4 -0.071 1.56 -2.13
Energy
levels Wave functions
(K)
300 0 0 1 0 0 0
300 0 0 0 1 0 0
230 0.190 0 0 0 0.982 0
230 0 0.982 0 0 0 0.190
0 0.982 0 0 0 -0.190 0
0 0 -0.190 0 0 0 0.982
Table 1: Crystalline electric field parameters, molecular field coefficient, energy levels and wave functions of the 4 electron in CePdAl determined from the analysis of the magnetic susceptibility and , and magnetization (Ba) and (Bc) in the paramagnetic state.
Figure 8: CEF level scheme and the wave functions, the spatial distributions of the wave functions of the 4 electron in CePdAl calculated by using CEF parameters. The wave function of the CEF ground state consists primarily of and the excitation levels are far from the ground state level (230 K and 300 K), indicating that the magnetic moments should be forced to align along the c-axis.

4.2 Superzone gap formation

We now focus on the anisotropic behavior of near and . The fact that jumps below but shows a small kink may be explained by two scenarios: (i) a spin density wave (SDW) transition and (ii) AF superzone formation. The SDW transition occurs to reduce the electron energy by nesting flat Fermi surfaces. Examples are Cr[24, 25], Ce(RuRh)Si[26, 27], CeNi[28], URuSi[29], YbPtBi[30], etc, where the 3 or 4(5) electrons have itinerant character to be involved in the Fermi surfaces. However, the 4 electrons in CePdAl are well localized as indicated from the small value of 18 mJ/mol K. The localize nature is also supported by the weak effect of pressure on and . Therefore, the scenario of a SDW transition is discarded.

A superzone gap can open in a certain direction on the Fermi surface when localized 4 electrons order antiferromagnetically. Because of CePdAl shows no enhancement at , the superzone gap should open along the c-axis. This is reasonable because the length of the reciprocal vector is much smaller than that of , providing higher possibility of opening a superzone gap along the c-direction. The configuration is similar to what was observed in Er metal[31, 32], where AF and ferromagnetic transitions occur at 85 and 19.6 K, respectively. Below , enhancement of is a consequence of the AF ordering with a magnetic structure characterized by longitudinal modulation moments. The propagation vector was determined to be k[0, 0, ][33], resulting in formation of new zone boundaries.

Following the procedure to evaluate the gap energy in Er, we estimate the energy gap in CePdAl from the thermal activation-type form of , where is an initial resistivity, is the energy gap and is the Boltzmanns constant. The solid line in the inset of Fig. 4(b) yields as 0.28 meV (3.2 K). Furthermore, we calculated and plotted the result with the bold solid curve in Fig. 4(b). The total resistivity can be expressed as follows,[34, 35, 36]

(5)

where is a residual resistivity, and and are phonon and magnetic contributions to the resistivity, respectively. We evaluated from the -dependent part of the electrical resistivity of the polycrystalline YPdAl, and assumed to be scaled by 3.8 times as large as the -dependent part of . In Eq. (5), is the temperature dependence of sublattice magnetization in the ordered state. In the present calculation, is assumed to be which is the same as the BCS-gap. Although the translation factor , which scales the effect of , depends on the band gap and shape of the Fermi surface, it is left as a parameter here. Nevertheless, this simple model with 4.72 cm and 0.18 can reproduce well the complex behavior of as shown in Fig 4(b). On further cooling, the appearance of the hump in at is a result of competition between the enhancement due to the superzone gap and the reduction due to the development of the magnetic ordering.

4.3 Magnetic structures and magnetic anisotropy in the AFM states

We now focus our attention on the magnetic structures and the strong anisotropy in the AF ordered state. The strong anisotropy of and such as 25 in 0.1 T and at 4 K, 20 in 5 T and at 1.9 K, respectively, means that the magnetic moments are forced to orient along the c-direction. From a perspective on the strong uniaxial anisotropy in the magnetic property, it is instructive to compare the magnetic properties of CePdAl with those of a dense Kondo compound CeNiAl.[37, 38] This compound crystallizing in a body centered orthorhombic PrNiAl-type structure undergoes an AF transition at 2.6 K. It shows large uniaxial anisotropy with the easy direction along the b-direction; 27 and 8 at 2.6 K, 27 and 9 in 5 T and at 1.4 K, respectively. The CEF ground state is a Kramers doublet, and the first and second excitation levels lie at 210 and 650 K above the ground state, respectively. In the AF ordered state, the magnetization isotherm exhibits anomalies only for Bb in 3.9 and 6.1 T at 1.4 K, whereas those for Ba and Bc increase monotonically with increasing magnetic field. Neutron diffraction experiments reveal that the magnetic structure can be characterized by the propagation vector k[0.500,0.405,0.083], where the magnetic moments align with a sine-wave modulated structure. The anisotropy and the jump at in the magnetization curves in the AF ordered state could not be explained by the simple two-sublattice mean-field model, however, the periodic mean-field model[39, 40] with isotropic magnetic interaction between the Ce-ions and its higher-order terms could reproduce well the anisotropic magnetization isotherm including the anomalies in (Bb).[41] In the case of CePdAl, the magnetic structure should be a modulated one characterized by the propagation vector with 0.48 . Therefore, the periodic mean-field model could explain the multi-step magnetization isotherm (Bb) when the magnetic structure could be determined. We are now in progress to perform neutron diffraction experiments on a single crystal.

To the best of our knowledge, the uniaxial anisotropy in the magnetic properties of CePdAl is the strongest among the tetragonal Ce intermetallic compounds. The anisotropy is much larger than that of the well studied orthorhombic system CeZn, which was suggested to be a model system of the 3D-Ising model.[42] Various ground states can emerge in the 3D-Ising system due to competing magnetic interactions. Moreover, they are strongly influenced by magnetic field, and thus show multistep metamagnetic transitions, complex magnetic phase diagrams and a tricritical point in the diagram. Such phenomena were observed in some AF systems like CeZn[42], FeBr[43], Co(SCN)(CHOH)[44], etc. Because CePdAl exhibits multistep metamagnetic transitions and a complicated magnetic phase diagram, it is a candidate for the 3D-Ising systems in the 4 electron system.

5 Conclusions

We performed electrical resistivity , magnetic susceptibility , magnetization and specific heat measurements on the singlecrystalline CePdAl. The successive AF transitions at 4.1 K and 2.9 K were confirmed. The magnetic entropy reaches a value close to ln2 at , indicating that the relevant Kramers state is not so much affected by the Kondo effect. The localized nature of the 4 electron state was indicated by the small value of 18 mJ/mol K. The magnetization measurements revealed strong uniaxial anisotropy; 25 in 0.1 T and at 4 K, 20 in 5 T and at 1.9 K. The giant uniaxial anisotropy observed in both the paramagnetic state and AF ordered state should result from the CEF ground state. The analysis of the CEF model revealed that the 4 electron ground state has a wave function consisting primarily of the components and its energy level is isolated from the first and second excited state by 230 and 300 K. The magnetization isotherm exhibits several anomalies only in Bc; 1.3, 1.5, 2.7 and 4.2 T at 1.9 K (), and 1.5, 2.7 T at 3.5 K (), whereas no anomaly emerges in Ba up to 5 T. These properties are very similar to those of CeNiAl, the orthorhombic system with comparably strong uniaxial anisotropy. The anisotropic properties including the magnetization isotherm for CeNiAl were well understood using the periodic mean-field model with the isotropic magnetic interactions between Ce moments. The close similarity indicates that the strong uniaxial anisotropy in CePdAl in the AF ordered state should arise from the CEF effect in the presence of isotropic interactions.

The electrical resistivity also shows anisotropic behavior such as 3.2 at 20 K. At =4.1 K, the substantial jump only in suggests the formation of a superzone gap along the c-direction. The resistivity measurements were done on the polycrystal sample under pressures up to 2.5 GPa. Thereby, both and were increased slowly, indicating that this system should be dominated by the RKKY interaction. To access a quantum critical point, measurements under pressures above 3 GPa are needed. Powder neutron diffraction experiments revealed the development of magnetic peaks at Q0.48 below . This observation indicates a long-periodic modulated structure but does not allow determination of the propagation vector. Though no additional change appears below , the magnetic structure should change at because apparent anomalies were found there in the macroscopic measurements. A small change of the propagation vector or evolution of an anti-phase structure may occur with appearance of the high-order reflections.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank F. Iga for helpful discussions. They also thank Y. Shibata for the electron-probe microanalysis performed at N-BARD, Hiroshima University and K. Nemoto in IMR, Tohoku University, for helpful assistance in the neutron diffraction experiments. The electrical resistivity, magnetization and specific heat measurements were carried out at N-BARD, Hiroshima University. This work was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), No. 18204032, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

References

  • [1] C. Geibel, C. Schank, S. Thies, H. Kitazawa, C. D. Bredl, A. Bhm, M. Rau, A. Grauel, R. Caspary, R. Helfrich, U. Ahlheim, G. Weber and F. Steglich: Z. Phys. B 84 (1990) 1.
  • [2] H. Kitazawa, C. Schank, S. Thies, B. Seidel, C. Geibel and F. Steglich: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61 (1992) 1461.
  • [3] J. Tang, A. Matsushita, H. Kitazawa and T. Matsumoto: Physica B 217 (1996) 97.
  • [4] J. G. Sereni, P. Pedrazzini, E. Bauer, A. Galatanu, Y. Aoki and H. Sato: J. Phys.: Condens Matter 18 (2006) 3789.
  • [5] P. Sun, Y. Isikawa, Q. Lu, D. Huo and T. Kuwai: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003) 916.
  • [6] P. Sun, Q. Lu, T. Ikeno, T. Kuwai, T. Mizushima and Y. Isikawa: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 (2006) 5715.
  • [7] S. A. M. Mentink, G. J. Niewenhuys, A. A. Menovsky, J. A. Mydosh, A. Drost, E. Frikkee, Y. Bando, T. Takabatake, P. Bni, P. Fisher, A. Furrer, A. Amato and A. Schenck: Physica B 199 & 200 (1994) 143.
  • [8] S. A. M. Mentink, G. J. Nieuwenhuys, A. A. Menovsky, J. A. Mydosh, H. Tou and Y. Kitaoka: Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 15759.
  • [9] H. Tou, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, S. A. M. Mentink, G. J. Nieuwenhuys, A. A. Menovsky and J. A. Mydosh: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1994) 4176.
  • [10] Y. Nemoto, T. Goto, S. Nakamura and H. Kitazawa: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 (1996) 2571.
  • [11] F. Hulliger: J. Alloys Compounds 196 (1993) 225.
  • [12] C. Schank, F. Jhrling. L. Luo, A. Grauel, C. Wassilew, R. Borth, G. Olesch, C. D. Bredl, C. Geibel and F. Steglich: J. Alloys Compounds 207/208 (1994) 329.
  • [13] H. Kitazawa, A. Matsushita, T. Matsumoto and T. Suzuki: Physica B 199 & 200 (1994) 28.
  • [14] A. Dnni, G. Ehlers, H. Maletta, P. Fischer, H. Kitazawa and M. Zolliker: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 8 (1996) 11213.
  • [15] D. Aoki, Y. Haga, T. D. Matsuda, N. Tateiwa, S. Ikeda, Y. Homma, H. Sakai, Y. Shiokawa, E. Yamamoto, N. Kakamura, R. Settai and Y. Ōnuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (2007) 063701.
  • [16] R. A. Ribeiro, T. Onimaru, K. Umeo, M. A. Avila, K. Shigetoh and T. Takabatake: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (2007) 123710.
  • [17] G. Nakamoto, T. Takabatake, H. Fujii, A. Minami, K. Maezawa, I. Oguro and A. A. Menovsky: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 64 (1995) 4834.
  • [18] F. Izumi and T. Ikeda: Mater. Sci. Forum 321-324 (2000) 198.
  • [19] K. Ohoyama, T. Kanouchi, K. Nemoto, M. Ohashi, T. Kajitani and Y. Yamaguchi: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1998) 3319.
  • [20] T. Sakakibara, H. Mitamura, T. Tayama and H. Amitsuka: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1994) 5067.
  • [21] C. D. Bredl: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 63 & 64 (1987) 355.
  • [22] S. Doniach: Physica B 91 (1977) 231.
  • [23] M. T. Hutchings: Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, Acadamic, New York, 1964 , Vol. 16, p. 227.
  • [24] E. Fawcett: Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 209.
  • [25] D. B. McWhan and T. M. Rice: Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 846.
  • [26] Y. Miyako, T. Takeuchi, T. Taniguchi, T. Yamamoto, S. Kawarazaki, M. Acet, G. Dumpich and E. F. Wassermann: Z. Phys. B 101 (1996) 339.
  • [27] S. Murayama, C. Sekine, A. Yokoyanagi, K. Hoshi and Y. Ōnuki: Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 11092.
  • [28] K. Umeo, H. Kadomatsu and T. Takabatake: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 (1996) 9743.
  • [29] C. Broholm, J. K. Kjems, W. J. L. Buyer, T. T. M. Palstra, A. A. Menovsky and J. A. Mydosh: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1467.
  • [30] R. Movshovich, A. Lacerda, P. C. Canfield, J. D. Thompson and Z. Fisk: Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 492.
  • [31] R. W. Green, S. Legvold and F. H. Spedding: Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 827.
  • [32] A. R. Mackintosh: Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 (1962) 90.
  • [33] D. Gibbs, J. Bohr, J. D. Axe, D. E. Moncton and K. L. Damico: Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 8182.
  • [34] H. Miwa: Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 208.
  • [35] R. J. Elliott and F. A. Wedgwood: Proc. Phys. Soc. 81 (1963) 846.
  • [36] R. J. Elliott and F. A. Wedgwood: Proc. Phys. Soc. 84 (1964) 63.
  • [37] Y. Isikawa, T. Mizushima, K. Oyabe, K. Mori, K. Sato and K. Kamigaki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1991) 1869.
  • [38] Y. Isikawa, T. Mizushima, J. Sakurai, K. Mori, A. Munoz, F. Givord, J. X. Boucherle, J. Voiron, I. S. Oliveira and J. Flouquet: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1994) 2349.
  • [39] J. A. Blanco, D. Gignoux and D. Schmitt: Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 13145.
  • [40] D. Gignoux and Schmitt: Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 12682.
  • [41] F. Givord, J. X. Boucherle and Y. Isikawa: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 (1996) Suppl. B 129.
  • [42] D. Gignoux, P. Morin, J. Voiron and P. Burlet: Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 8877.
  • [43] K. Katsumata, H. A. Katori, S. M. Shapio and G. Shirane: Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 11466.
  • [44] G. C. DeFotis, B. T. Wimberly, R. B. Jeffers, W. M. May and T. M. Owens: Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 014419.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
165908
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description