Giant anomalous self-steepening in photonic crystal waveguides

Giant anomalous self-steepening in photonic crystal waveguides

Chad Husko and Pierre Colman Centre for Ultrahigh bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems (CUDOS), Institute of Photonics and Optical Science (IPOS), School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
DTU Fotonik, ørsted plads, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Institut d’Electronique Fontamentale (IEF), Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
Corresponding author:
July 20, 2019

Self-steepening of optical pulses arises due the dispersive contribution of the Kerr nonlinearity. In typical structures this response is on the order of a few femtoseconds with a fixed frequency response. In contrast, the effective Kerr nonlinearity in photonic crystal waveguides (PhCWGs) is largely determined by the geometrical parameters of the structure and is consequently tunable over a wide range. Here we show self-steepening based on group-velocity (group-index) modulation for the first time, giving rise to a new physical mechanism for generating this effect. Further, we demonstrate that periodic media such as PhCWGS can exhibit self-steepening coefficients two orders of magnitude larger than typical systems. At these magnitudes the self-steepening strongly affects the nonlinear pulse dynamics even for picosecond pulses. Due to interaction with additional higher-order nonlinearities in the semiconductor materials under consideration, we employ a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation numerical model to describe the impact of self-steepening on the temporal and spectral properties of the optical pulses in practical systems, including new figures of merit. These results provide a theoretical description for recent experimental results presented in [Scientific Reports 3, 1100 (2013) and Phys. Rev. A 87, 041802 (2013)]. More generally, these observations apply to all periodic media due to the rapid group-velocity variation characteristic of these structures.

photonic crystals, self-steepening, dispersive nonlinearity, free carrier dispersion, solitons, nonlinear optics, integrated optics, semiconductor optics
42.65.Tg, 42.65.Wi, 42.70.Qs, 42.82.-m

I Introduction

A recent trend in nonlinear optics is the development and design of waveguide systems with tunable nonlinearities. In addition to a broad tuning range, these systems are characterized by the ability to separate the contributions of the material constituents from the device geometry. This is in contrast to early approaches in both glass Cohen et al. (1979) and semiconductors Aitchison et al. (1997) which required a change in material composition to modify the waveguide properties. The role of geometry drastically changed with the advent of micro-structured fibers and the demonstration that fabrication parameters could be the dominant contribution to the dispersion Knight et al. (1996). More recently, it has been shown that gas-filled hollow-core fibers can activate or suppress nonlinearities such as the Raman effect Russell et al. (2014). In parallel, rapid advances in integrated semiconductor devices have pushed the forefront of optical science by reducing nonlinear thresholds to sub-femtojoule energy levels Nozaki et al. (2010) while simultaneously incorporating dispersion control Colman et al. (2012a). Among nanostructures, photonic crystal waveguides (PhCWGs) are of extreme interest due to the link between geometric fabrication and direct modulation of the electric field, giving rise to new physical phenomena such as slow-light and enhanced nonlinearity.

Slow-light refers to light propagating at a reduced group-velocity in the medium. Interest in this unique property has inspired a large body of research investigating the linear and nonlinear properties of slow-light in two-dimensional (2D) PhCWGs over the past decade Baba (2008); Bhat and Sipe (2001). Recall the group index is related to the waveguide dispersion relation and the group-velocity : , with frequency , wavevector , and the speed of light in vacuum . Of particular significance, it was shown that optical effects such as the Kerr nonlinearity scale with the group index squared in the presence of slow-light Bhat and Sipe (2001). Briefly, one factor of arises from a larger electric field for a given power (nonlinear enhancement), with the second from longer effective optical path length (linear enhancement). We note that the slow-light-enhancement described here is derived from the structure. In contrast, material slow light from atomic resonances does not exhibit this enhancement Boyd (2011). In PhCWGs we write the effective nonlinear Kerr parameter as , with the bulk Kerr coefficient , modal area , and linear refractive index . While the term is well described in the literature, research into the slow-light enhancement contribution in 2D PhCWGs required significant advances in nanofabrication techniques which were only mastered the past few years.

A 2D PhCWG consists of a periodic array of low-index dielectric embedded in a high-index material. A common experimental configuration which we consider here consists of a hexagonal pattern of air holes etched in an air-suspended semiconductor slab. Importantly, the dispersion of these 2D PhCWGs is highly tunable due to selected geometric modifications of the periodic lattice known as dispersion engineering Colman et al. (2012a); Li et al. (2008). The precise modulation of the waveguide group index enables exquisite control over the dispersion and therefore the nonlinear properties of the medium. Experimental reports of slow-light enhanced nonlinear Kerr effects in 2D PhCWGs include demonstrations of solitons, third-harmonic generation, and four-wave mixing, amongst others Colman et al. (2010); Corcoran et al. (2009); McMillan et al. (2010). Despite this strong interest in slow-light, the dispersion of the Kerr nonlinearity, or self-steepening (SS) term , has received surprisingly little attention in these systems.

The earliest investigations of SS in waveguide systems were carried out in glass fiber with these studies emphasizing the spectral re-shaping properties Fork et al. (1983); Knox et al. (1985) or the formation of optical shock fronts Anderson and Lisak (1983). Later it was shown SS is essential for extending the validity of the Generalized Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (GNLSE) envelope approximation down to the single-cycle regime Brabec and Krausz (1997), and for explaining broadband supercontinuum generation Gaeta (2000). In these systems the SS term is determined almost exclusively by the wave angular frequency and therefore exhibits a fixed response of about a femtosecond for optical frequencies. A more recent numerical investigation showed the wavelength dependence of the nonlinear Kerr effect in silicon channel waveguides leads to values up to tens of femtoseconds near mode cutoff Panoiu et al. (2009). An alternative approach for generating SS using cascaded media as an effective tunable was shown with similar strength to traditional media Moses and Wise (2006). To date, self-steepening in tunable media has not been explicitly experimentally demonstrated.

In this article, we investigate self-steepening in 2D photonic crystal waveguides. Importantly we show the large variation in waveguide group index leads to a new physical mechanism for generating self-steepening with a characteristic time scale on the order of hundreds of femtoseconds, two orders of magnitude larger than in non-periodic waveguide systems Knox et al. (1985); Panoiu et al. (2009). We derive an analytic formulation and describe the origin of this effect. Further, we describe structures in which the values of are anomalous (negative), hence leading to notably different physical effects than previously known systems. The broad tuning range of enabled by dispersion-engineering make PhCWGs an ideal system for further studies of SS. While the magnitude of is quite large, the presence of other effects such as group velocity dispersion (GVD, ), and higher order nonlinearities such as multi-photon absorption or free-carrier effects can disrupt the ideal dynamics. We consequently describe the experimental situations in which SS is expected to contribute significantly in the semiconductor system under consideration using a numerical model. This analysis supports recent experimental results showing pulse temporal advance in PhCWGs Husko et al. (2013); Raineri et al. (2013). Though the Raman-effect is narrowband in semiconductors and negligible here, this analysis could be extended to include periodic glass media where Raman and Brillouin effects must be considered Freeman et al. (2005). These results provide the first theoretical description of giant and tunable self-steepening in nanoscale optical waveguides.

More generally, this investigation applies to all periodic media (1D, 2D, 3D) where a dispersive arises due to strong group-index modulation near the band-edge. Given the importance of the dispersive nonlinearity in explaining supercontinuum broadening in fibers, we expect the new terms elucidated here to be critical for accurately describing this phenomenon in photonic crystals.

Ii Self-steepening in PhCWGs

Figure 1: Group index curves and self-steepening parameters of PhC waveguides. (a) We show three typical waveguides: (b,green) a dispersion-engineered structure with a quasi flat plateau, (c,cyan) a W1 line-defect waveguide, and (d,blue) and a dispersion-engineered waveguide with a peak. (b)-(d) Show the self-steepening parameter (black line) as a function of wavelength for the three structures. The different contributions to SS are shown: (black-dashed), (red) and (blue).

Though near-arbitrary dispersion profiles are possible in periodic media Colman et al. (2012a); Li et al. (2008), here we focus on three specific experimentally demonstrated structures for clarity. Figure 1 shows three group index curves for PhCWGs with different dispersion relations: (i) a standard line defect waveguide of one missing row of holes in a hexagonal lattice (W1), (ii) a dispersion engineered waveguideColman et al. (2012a) exhibiting a plateau, and (iii) a dispersion with a pronounced group index peak. The dot indicates a point of interest we investigate in this work.

If we assume the Kerr nonlinearity evolves linearly then the impact of dispersive nonlinearity on pulse propagation dynamics is modeled by adding a first order Kerr correction term to the GNLSE Brabec and Krausz (1997); Panoiu et al. (2009):


Here t is the relative time in the reference frame of the pulse with the electric-field envelope with power and phase . The last term is referred to the self-steepening or shock term and expressed as:


where we used the relationship . The two first terms exist in bulk material and contribute up to a few femtoseconds. In practice the Kerr dispersion is often neglected. These are the traditional self-steepening terms known in unstructured waveguides and do not play a role here with these small magnitudes Knox et al. (1985). The third term encompassing effective modal areas was considered in fibers Mamyshev and Chernikov (1990), and theoretically in silicon channel waveguides Panoiu et al. (2009) with surprisingly little attention in PCFs Dudley et al. (2006). Further, in those earlier works the area term contributed a few percent whereas here the slow-light modes exhibit rapid variation in spatial profile with and this term contributes approximately  25 % to the total .

The key physical insight of this work is the realization that the final term due to the dispersive group-index gives rise to a previously unknown mechanism for controlling self-steepening. In contrast to earlier observations, in our photonic crystal waveguide the magnitude of is set by a combination of the group-index , GVD () and effective modal area . As these three parameters depend strongly on the geometry, we clearly see the advantage of using nanostructures to study the dispersive nonlinearity. We now examine this effect in detail.

Figures 1(b)-(d) show the evolution of the ratio for the waveguides in Fig 1(a). The contribution of the different terms composing Eqn. 2 are also represented. We note three major observations unique to the PhCWG system. First, is two orders of magnitude larger than unstructured waveguides (black dashed line) where  1 fs. Notice the contribution appears to be near-zero and completely flat compared to the PhCWG contributions on this scale. Second, the sign of is negative. Consequently the spectral and temporal properties of the nonlinear waves behave in an opposite or anomalous manner as we will examine. Third, the dominant contribution arises from the dispersion term (red) with a modification in the opposite direction due to (blue). If we ignore the area contribution, we approximate .

Examining the characteristics of the waveguides individually, we find different trends for each. Regarding the W1 waveguide Fig 1(c), steadily decreases approaching the mode cutoff (increasing wavelength). A value of about -200 fs is obtained close the the band edge, however in a region where propagation loss is large in this type of PhCWG O’Faolain et al. (2010). On the contrary for the dispersion-engineered waveguides the values are mostly negative with a small positive region for the structures presented. Notice in this case values as large as -200 fs (Fig 1(b)) and -400 fs (Fig 1(d)) are reached away from the band edge where propagation losses are reduced Patterson and Hughes (2010); Mann et al. (2013). The lower linear loss of the latter structures has implications for practical observation of these effects.

Iii Temporal and spectral properties due to anomalous self-steepening in PhCWGs

We now describe the physical implications of the self-steepening term on nonlinear wave propagation in PhCWGs. For that purpose we consider typical parameters found in recent nonlinear experiments Husko et al. (2013); Colman et al. (2012b, 2010); Raineri et al. (2013); Combrié et al. (2009). We take  = 1600 (W.m) (=15, =3.17 for GaInP), an anomalous dispersion of  = -7.7 ps/mm,  = 6m/W and modal area  = 0.34 m Colman et al. (2012a). The dispersive nonlinearity is = -220 fs as detailed above. The input pulses are  = 2.3 ps (full-width at half-maximum of a hyperbolic secant, ) with  = 3 - 10 W (6 - 20 pJ/pulse). The dispersion length is computed as 220 m. Importantly, throughout this work we purposely maintain small soliton numbers ( 2) so as to avoid more complicated soliton dynamics modulating the peak intensity and pulse duration Husko et al. (2013).

At this point we are focusing on the basic physical effects resulting from the unique photonic crystal dispersion in the ‘ideal’ system. In the next section we will introduce the full effects present in typical semiconductor waveguides and describe how these results are modified. While based on actual experimental structures, note that the conditions may not be optimal for emphasizing the self-steepening effect and we invite the community to explore the parameter space further.

The normalized self-steepening parameter is:


For our parameters = -0.1, more than five times larger than non-periodic waveguides Knox et al. (1985). This is even more remarkable when one considers the pulses are 2.3 ps long compared to the sub-100 fs pulses required in unstructured media where  = . The large value of requires much shorter length scales to observe the associated effects of self-steepening. A pulse experiencing self-steepening will eventually develop a shock front after propagating a shock lengthAnderson and Lisak (1983) of about:


where is the nonlinear effective length, and the numerical constant depends on the actual pulse shape, here a hyperbolic secant Anderson and Lisak (1983). Typical shock lengths in our structures are 350 m for a 2.3 ps pulse with peak power of 8 W. As this article is focused on self-steepening, we do not describe the physics of optical shock waves in detail here. Nonetheless, this is a well known and useful length scale for estimating the relative scaling of self-steepening which we adopt here for convenience. Note that the mechanism presented here is not the only possibility for developing shock fronts. A highly nonlinear medium in presence of weak normal dispersion, for example, could also lead to shock formation even though no dispersive nonlinearity is present Conforti et al. (2014).

The nonlinear dispersion plays a key role in the pulse dynamics of both the temporal and spectral properties. We first address the impact of SS on temporal shape and delay. A subtle point that must be addressed is the dual role of . First, it has been shown in earlier work that dissipates shock fronts Knox et al. (1985). Second, and separate to this point, we showed above that is intrinsically linked to the large magnitude of . As a result, one cannot ignore for a SS effect arising from a strong modulation of the group index and consequently observing a tilted line-shape is unlikely for SS derived from this method. While the temporal shape is not modulated in this case, the temporal arrival time is affected as we show below.

Figure 2(a) shows the temporal profile obtained for the point indicated by the blue dot in Fig 1(a-c) after a propagation distance of 200 . The input pulse (black line) has a peak power of 8 W (=80 m), hence the pulse has completed about two and a half nonlinear lengths . The thick-red line shows the case where we include only the Kerr and SS contributions to Eqn. 1. That is, we include the contribution to but neglect the temporal dispersion term . Notice that since is negative here the pulse peak tilts forwards in time, which is opposite to earlier studies with a positive self-steepening term. Moreover, with the large value here, a steep temporal leading edge is already clearly visible after a propagation of a just few . Simulations with all the terms in Eqn. 1 are shown as the dashed blue line. In contrast to the ideal dispersion-less case (thick red) where the temporal trace exhibits a clear abrupt leading edge characteristic of shock formation, the shock front is less pronounced for the same propagation length and the pulse tends to preserve its initial shape (soliton effect).

A separate temporal effect in the presence of self-steepening is a shift in pulse arrival time. Assuming the pulse duration and a moderate soliton number, the dispersive nonlinearity acts as a small perturbation that slightly modifies the group velocity Anderson and Lisak (1983); de Oliveira and de Moura (1998); Chen et al. (2010). Here with the negative value, the pulses are expected to advance in time, once again in contrast to the delay of earlier observations. This effect is clearly visible by the temporal advance of the two traces examined in Fig 2. One of the most challenging aspects of observing self-steepening in real PhCWGs is the strong resemblance of SS and free-carrier dispersion (FCD) in the time domain. We investigate this in detail below.

Figure 2(b) shows typical pulse spectra for the negative values characteristic of PhCWGs. The pulse spectrum is clearly rendered asymmetric in the presence of self-steepening. The blue-shifted peaks become more intense, while the red components are notably broader compared to the symmetric broadening characteristic of SPM. The role of is less pronounced.

Figure 2: Temporal and spectral pulse properties of anomalous self-steepening in PhC waveguides. (a) Temporal pulse shapes. (b) Spectral pulse shapes. Notice the behavior is opposite to unstructured media exhibiting normal self-steepening. Traces are shown for propagation of 200 m. Legend: Kerr and SS only (thick red), full Eqn. 1 (dashed blue), and input pulse (black).

Iv Self-steepening in semiconductors

In our analysis thus far we have ignored several effects present in practical systems. The role of linear loss has been previously studied and in the limit 1 shock waves are unobservable altogether Anderson and Lisak (1983). For the waveguide experiments referenced above the linear loss is given by  = 15 dB/cm (at  = 15). This yields  = 0.11, indicating these waveguides can in principle support shocks.

However, in semiconductor media we must also consider nonlinear absorption of multiple photons across the electronic bandgap. For a typical wavelength of 1550 nm (photon energy of 0.8 eV), silicon ( = 1.1 eV) is restricted by two-photon absorption (TPA) and the wide-gap material GaInP ( = 1.9 eV) is limited by three-photon absorption (3PA). While the optical properties of silicon have been widely studied, only over the past years we have investigated the properties of GaInP and established this material as a viable platform for nonlinear optics at 1.5 Husko et al. (2013); Colman et al. (2010); Husko et al. (2009); Combrié et al. (2009). In simplest terms, nonlinear absorption damp the dynamics similar to linear absorption. An order of magnitude estimate shows loss due to TPA (3PA) requires (), with the intensity , to observe a shock. Physically these ratios compare the strength of the nonlinear loss to the self-steepening term.

For the TPA case (e.g. Silicon, =1 GW/cm Bristow et al. (2007)) the ratio indicating SS-induced shocks are not generally accessible in this material, even for this large = -0.1. Here we have defined a new nonlinear figure-of-merit (FOM) for self-steepening and TPA. Its form is noticeably similar to the well-known version for Kerr-TPA switching Mizrahi et al. (1989) with the additional term for SS. Notice this ratio is independent of power for TPA and therefore SS will always be much weaker than TPA. Since TPA dominates the SS effect, we focus mainly on the 3PA system in the following analysis.

The 3PA material (e.g. GaInP, =0.013 GW/cm Wherrett (1984)) is much more favorable, yielding  1 which is satisfied for intensities up to about 50 GW/cm. This threshold is intensity-dependent due to the different nonlinear orders of Kerr and 3PA. Including the slow-light enhancements and this relation becomes  1 and is satisfied up to 10 GW/cm for the conditions here. In contrast, the TPA-limited SS case does not scale with slow-light. Note these estimates are only indicative and do not correspond to strict thresholds. For larger powers, free-carrier absorption would play an important role until the peak power falls below its threshold. Now that we have established the role of nonlinear loss, we describe the free-carrier effects.

Free-carriers generated via these nonlinear absorption mechanisms have an equally significant impact in the pulse dynamics through both dispersive (FCD, ) and absorptive (FCA, ) contributions. Importantly, the physical signatures of anomalous self-steepening strongly resemble those of FCD, especially in the time domain. Namely, like anomalous SS, the pulse also advances as a function of input power due to FCD combined with anomalous GVD as our recent experiments show Husko et al. (2013); Blanco-Redondo et al. (2014a).

A broader GNLSE including all of these effects is:


Figure 3: Temporal and spectral behavior of anomalous self-steepening in after a propagation distance of 500  in realistic PhCWGs. (a) Temporal traces for 3PA-limited materials: full (green), FCD alone (blue), self-steepening alone (red). The black lines correspond to the input pulse. (b) Spectra for 3PA-limited materials. (c)-(d) Pulse temporal advance as a function of power for (c) 3PA-limited (solid) and (d) TPA-limited (dashed) systems. Green curves correspond to the full model in Eqn. 5. Blue lines are the case where we neglect SS, whereas red lines indicate when FCD is neglected. We include the full 3PA result in (d) to compare the relative scales of the two systems.

For the modeling below, we take the slow-light scaled values of the bulk parameters as described in prior literature Husko et al. (2009); Blanco-Redondo et al. (2014a). The parameters are = 18 m.W, == -1.8 m, = 1.3 m. The 3PA area is Husko et al. (2009). We have also included the third-order dispersion (TOD,  = +0.7 ps/mm) for completeness as this cannot be ignored in the real system. Regarding one case briefly presented below where the material is limited by TPA (silicon), we take  = 570 (W.m). It is worthwhile to point out that these parameters correspond to actual experimental parameters and therefore are immediately realizable in current systems.

Figure 3(a) shows the pulse temporal shift due to the competing self-steepening and FCD effects in the 3PA limited material () at a peak power of 8 W. When considered in isolation the FCD-GVD curve (blue, no SS) and SS-only curve (red, no FCD) each would contribute a few picoseconds of delay. Moreover they have a relatively similar temporal shape. Note these effects do not add linearly, but rather compete for power and interact dynamically to yield the full result (green).

Importantly, the spectral features of FCD and SS are distinct. Figure 3(b) shows the spectral properties of pulses propagating in the 3PA system. Considering only the self-steepening effect (red curve) results in a minor modulation to the symmetric shape expected from SPM-only and does not shift the spectral center-of-mass. In contrast, the FCD induces a clear blue shift in the pulse center-of-mass Husko et al. (2013). When we consider these effects simultaneously (green curve), the FCD is clearly the dominant contribution. Thus these effects are more easily distinguished in the spectral domain.

The nonlinear scaling laws of SS and the FCD-GVD temporal shift are also notably different. Notice whereas FCD (TPA) or FCD (3PA), where we have written FCD, with indicating the order of nonlinear absorption generating the free-carriers. Figures 3(c) and (d) report the scaling of SS and FCD as a function of power for (c) 3PA and (d) TPA-limited materials. We observe SS (red curve) scales much more slowly compared to FCD (blue curve). The full simulation (green dashed) more closely follows SS at low powers and the FCD trend at higher power. For the TPA case shown in (d) the SS induced delay is noticeably smaller due to stronger nonlinear TPA loss which caps the peak power more than the 3PA case. In (d) we also show the 3PA curve for comparison, highlighting the greater temporal shift in this case.

The striking similarity of the temporal advance and pulse shapes from both SS and FCD-GVD are highlighted in recent experimental results. The GaInP waveguides in both cases are similar to that in Fig 1(c), with relatively small values of compared to that highlighted in this work. In a ThPA system the temporal advances are attributed to FCD-GVD supported with numerical modelling Husko et al. (2013), however with no SS term. Similar results were shown in Refs.Blanco-Redondo et al. (2014a, b) in silicon. In contrast, a pulse advance attributed to SS only was reported in Ref. Raineri et al. (2013). Critically that report did not include the important contribution of FCD-GVD term, but rather attributed it to SS alone. As we have shown here, the FCD-GVD advance plays an equally important role as SS and cannot be ignored.

The true physical situation is likely a combination of these effects though the exact scaling would be challenging due to soliton dynamics modulating the peak power and requires careful experiments and numerical modeling to discern the effects. Nonetheless, one could use the moments method in Ref. Lefrancois et al. (2015) to estimate the magnitude of the temporal shift from FCD-GVD or the SS time shift equation given above for order-of-magnitude values.

One last important aspect to consider is the relative impact of the instantaneous SS and non-local FCD effects on pulse delay during propagation. The SS induced delay depends directly on the instantaneous peak power and hence will eventually decrease due to linear and nonlinear loss. In contrast, the effect of FCD on the group velocity persists even if the pulse peak power decreases. Physically this results from the spectral FCD frequency blue-shift and accompanying change in the group-velocity experienced by the pulse Lefrancois et al. (2015).

Finally we show the evolution of the nonlinear dynamics of the pulse propagating down the waveguide. Figure 4(a) shows the change in pulse delay along the waveguide length for the two mechanisms in the 3PA system at a peak power of 8 W. The change in delay due to the SS effect (red, FCD=0 and FCA=0) is strongest in the first 200 m and then tapers off due to loss. The FCD effect (blue, =0) continues to experience a change in delay right until the end of the propagation with the full curve (green) more closely resembling this case. Figure 4(b) shows the corresponding peak power evolution which gives insight into the dominant nonlinear mechanism as the pulse evolves. We attribute the initial increase in peak power to soliton compression.

Figure 4: Role of instantaneous SS and non-local FCD on pulse delay. (a) Contribution of SS alone (red) and FCD alone (blue) to the total pulse delay (green) for propagation lengthts up to 1 mm. (b) Peak power evolution corresponding to the cases presented in the upper panel. Note the low overall peak power after 500 m of propagation. Legend: full model (green), no free carrier effects (red), no SS (blue).

V Conclusion

In this Letter, we investigated the nonlinear self-steepening effect in photonic crystal waveguides. Our first principles derivation in the nanostructured periodic waveguides revealed a self-steepening term two orders of magnitude larger than typical systems. Importantly the self steepening coefficient is determined by the geometric parameters of the waveguide, offering a large tuning range of both positive and negative values. The origin of this giant is the strong dispersion of PhCWGs counterbalanced by a modal area contribution. We considered the role of higher-order effects in practical systems with new figures of merit, concluding that the nonlinear loss quenches the dynamics. We showed that the principal physical signature of the anomalous SS effect is a temporal forward tilt and pulse advance in contrast to the delay observed in normal SS media. In the semiconductor waveguides these effects compete with FCD which also advance the pulse, whereas the spectral signatures of self-steepening and FCD are distinct. We suggest future experiments exploring the full range of these dynamics be undertaken to reveal the full dynamics of this giant tunable self-steepening mechanism, especially in the supercontinuum regime.

This work was supported by the VKR fundet through the centre of excellence NATEC and the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA DE120102069).


  • Cohen et al. (1979) L. Cohen, C. Lin,  and W. French, Electronics Letters 15, 334 (1979).
  • Aitchison et al. (1997) J. Aitchison, D. Hutchings, J. Kang, G. Stegeman,  and A. Villeneuve, Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of 33, 341 (1997).
  • Knight et al. (1996) J. Knight, T. Birks, P. S. J. Russell,  and D. Atkin, Optics Letters 21, 1547 (1996).
  • Russell et al. (2014) P. S. J. Russell, P. Hölzer, W. Chang, A. Abdolvand,  and J. Travers, Nature Photonics 8, 278 (2014).
  • Nozaki et al. (2010) K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, A. Shinya, S. Matsuo, T. Sato, H. Taniyama,  and M. Notomi, Nature Photonics 4, 477 (2010).
  • Colman et al. (2012a) P. Colman, S. Combrié, G. Lehoucq,  and A. D. Rossi, Opt. Express 20, 13108 (2012a).
  • Baba (2008) T. Baba, Nature Photonics 2, 465 (2008).
  • Bhat and Sipe (2001) N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056604 (2001).
  • Boyd (2011) R. W. Boyd, JOSA B 28, A38 (2011).
  • Li et al. (2008) J. Li, T. P. White, L. O’Faolain, A. Gomez-Iglesias,  and T. F. Krauss, Opt. Express 16, 6227 (2008).
  • Colman et al. (2010) P. Colman, C. Husko, S. Combrié, I. Sagnes, C. W. Wong,  and A. D. Rossi, Nature Photonics 4, 862� (2010).
  • Corcoran et al. (2009) B. Corcoran, C. Monat, C. Grillet, D. Moss, B. Eggleton, T. White, L. O’Faolain,  and T. Krauss, Nature Photonics 3, 206 (2009).
  • McMillan et al. (2010) J. F. McMillan, M. Yu, D.-L. Kwong,  and C. W. Wong, Optics Express 18, 15484 (2010).
  • Fork et al. (1983) R. L. Fork, C. V. Shank, C. Ifirlimann, R. Yen,  and W. J. Tomlinson, Opt. Lett. 8 (1983).
  • Knox et al. (1985) W. Knox, R. Fork, M. Downer, R. Stolen, C. Shank,  and J. Valdmanis, Applied Physics Letters 46, 1120 (1985).
  • Anderson and Lisak (1983) D. Anderson and M. Lisak, Physical Review A 27, 1393 (1983).
  • Brabec and Krausz (1997) T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Physical Review Letters 78, 3282 (1997).
  • Gaeta (2000) A. L. Gaeta, Physical Review Letters 84, 3582 (2000).
  • Panoiu et al. (2009) N. C. Panoiu, X. Liu,  and R. M. Osgood Jr, Optics Letters 34, 947 (2009).
  • Moses and Wise (2006) J. Moses and F. W. Wise, Physical Review Letters 97, 073903 (2006).
  • Husko et al. (2013) C. A. Husko, S. Combrié, P. Colman, J. Zheng, A. D. R. Rossi,  and C. W. Wong, Scientific Reports 3, 1100 (2013).
  • Raineri et al. (2013) F. Raineri, T. J. Karle, V. Roppo, P. Monnier,  and R. Raj, Phys. Rev. A 87, 041802 (2013).
  • Freeman et al. (2005) D. Freeman, S. Madden,  and B. Luther-Davies, Optics Express 13, 3079 (2005).
  • Mamyshev and Chernikov (1990) P. Mamyshev and S. V. Chernikov, Optics Letters 15, 1076 (1990).
  • Dudley et al. (2006) J. M. Dudley, G. Genty,  and S. Coen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1135 (2006).
  • O’Faolain et al. (2010) L. O’Faolain, S. A. Schulz, D. M. Beggs, T. P. White, M. Spasenović, L. Kuipers, F. Morichetti, A. Melloni, S. Mazoyer, J.-P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne,  and T. F. Krauss, Optics Express 18, 27627 (2010).
  • Patterson and Hughes (2010) M. Patterson and S. Hughes, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245321 (2010).
  • Mann et al. (2013) N. Mann, S. Combrié, P. Colman, M. Patterson, A. D. Rossi,  and S. Hughes, Opt. Lett. 38, 4244 (2013).
  • Colman et al. (2012b) P. Colman, S. Combrié, G. Lehoucq, A. de Rossi,  and S. Trillo, Physical Review Letters 109 (2012b), 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.093901.
  • Combrié et al. (2009) S. Combrié, Q. V. Tran, A. D. Rossi, C. Husko,  and P. Colman, Applied Physics Letters 95, 221108 (2009).
  • Conforti et al. (2014) M. Conforti, F. Baronio,  and S. Trillo, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013807 (2014).
  • de Oliveira and de Moura (1998) J. R. de Oliveira and M. A. de Moura, Phys. Rev. E 57, 4751 (1998).
  • Chen et al. (2010) Z. Chen, A. J. Taylor,  and A. Efimov, JOSA B 27, 1022 (2010).
  • Husko et al. (2009) C. Husko, S. Combrié, Q. V. Tran, F. Raineri, C. W. Wong,  and A. De Rossi, Optics Express 17, 22442 (2009).
  • Bristow et al. (2007) A. D. Bristow, N. Rotenberg,  and H. M. Van Driel, Applied Physics Letters 90, 191104 (2007).
  • Mizrahi et al. (1989) V. Mizrahi, M. Saifi, M. Andrejco, K. DeLong,  and G. Stegeman, Optics Letters 14, 1140 (1989).
  • Wherrett (1984) B. Wherrett, JOSA B 1, 67 (1984).
  • Blanco-Redondo et al. (2014a) A. Blanco-Redondo, D. Eades, J. Li, S. Lefrancois, T. F. Krauss, B. J. Eggleton,  and C. Husko, Optica 1, 299 (2014a).
  • Blanco-Redondo et al. (2014b) A. Blanco-Redondo, C. Husko, D. Eades, Y. Zhang, J. Li, T. Krauss,  and B. Eggleton, Nature Communications 5 (2014b).
  • Lefrancois et al. (2015) S. Lefrancois, C. Husko, A. Blanco-Redondo,  and B. J. Eggleton, JOSAB 32, 218 (2015).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description