# General-relativistic model of hot accretion flows with global Compton cooling

###### Abstract

We present a model of optically thin, two-temperature, accretion flows using an exact Monte Carlo treatment of global Comptonization, with seed photons from synchrotron and bremsstrahlung emission, as well as with a fully general relativistic description of both the radiative and hydrodynamic processes. We consider accretion rates for which the luminosities of the flows are between and of the Eddington luminosity. The black hole spin parameter strongly affects the flow structure within the innermost gravitational radii. The resulting large difference between the Coulomb heating in models with a non-rotating and a rapidly rotating black hole is, however, outweighed by a strong contribution of compression work, much less dependent on spin. The consequent reduction of effects related to the value of the black spin is more significant at smaller accretion rates. For a non-rotating black hole, the compressive heating of electrons dominates over their Coulomb heating, and results in an approximately constant radiative efficiency of per cent in the considered range of luminosities. For a rapidly rotating black hole, the Coulomb heating dominates, the radiative efficiency is per cent and it slightly increases (but less significantly than estimated in some previous works) with increasing accretion rate. Our study neglects the direct heating of electrons, which effect can lead to larger differences between the radiative properties of models with a non-rotating and a rapidly rotating black hole than estimated here. Flows with the considered parameters produce rather hard spectra, with the photon spectral index , and with high energy cut-offs at several hundred keV. We find an agreement between our model, in which the synchrotron emission is the main source of seed photons, and observations of black-hole binaries in their hard states and AGNs at low luminosities. In particular, our model predicts a hardening of the X-ray spectrum with increasing luminosity, as indeed observed below or so in both black-hole binaries and AGNs. Also, our model approximately reproduces the luminosity and the slope of the X-ray emission in Cen A.

###### keywords:

accretion, accretion discs – black hole physics – X-rays: binaries – X-rays: general.^{†}

^{†}pagerange: General-relativistic model of hot accretion flows with global Compton cooling–References

^{†}

^{†}pubyear: 2011

## 1 Introduction

Optically thin, two-temperature accretion flows have been considered as an explanation of a variety of black hole systems and a substantial work has been done for investigation of their dynamical and spectral properties (see, e.g., Narayan & McClintock 2008 for a review). However, the developed models still involve several approximations which significantly reduce their accuracy. These involve the use of a pseudo-Newtonian potential of Paczyński & Wiita (1980), which fails in the innermost region (particularly if rotation of the black hole is considered), where most of the gravitational energy is dissipated, as well as local approximations of Comptonization, which appear to be particularly incorrect in optically thin flows (see Xie et al. 2010; hereafter X10). Previous attempts to improve these two weaknesses are discussed in Section 3.5.

In this paper, we extend our previous treatment of global Comptonization from X10 by using the hydrodynamical model from Manmoto (2000; hereafter M00), and develop a self-consistent model involving a fully general-relativistic (GR) description of both the hydrodynamical and the radiative processes. We consider moderate values of accretion rate, at which Coulomb coupling between ions and electrons is relatively weak compared to the viscous heating of ions and, therefore, the ion temperature (and hence the total pressure) is not affected significantly by the details of the description of radiative processes. This allows for a slightly simplified treatment of the flow structure in our computations leading to a self-consistent solution.

Already the foundational papers proposed that tenuous, two-temperature flows may be responsible for the hard spectral states of black-hole binaries (Ichimaru 1977; see also Narayan & Yi 1995) and for the low nuclear luminosities in radio galaxies with large radio lobes (Rees et al. 1982). We consider two ranges of the key parameters (black hole mass and accretion rate) which should be relevant for these two major application areas. For each of these two cases, we illustrate the impact of the black hole spin by considering a non-rotating and a maximally-rotating black hole. On the other hand, we neglect here the dependence on some other parameters of hot-flow models.

In particular, we consider only weakly magnetized flows, with the magnetic pressure of 1/10th of the total pressure, and we neglect the direct viscous heating of electrons; see Section 3.6 for a discussion of these two assumptions. Furthermore, we neglect outflows, which may play an important role in some systems (e.g. Yuan, Quataert & Narayan 2003). Then, our solutions are strongly dominated by the advection of energy by ions, as in the original formulation of the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF) model by, e.g., Narayan & Yi (1995).

In this paper, we focus on modelling an innermost part of an accretion flow, namely inside , where is the gravitational radius and is the black-hole mass, where the bulk of the observed radiation is produced. Global Comptonization has a net effect of Compton heating outside (e.g. Park & Ostriker 2001, Yuan, Xie & Ostriker 2009, Yuan & Li 2011), which effect is not considered here.

## 2 The model

We consider a black hole, characterised by its mass, , and angular momentum, , surrounded by a geometrically thick accretion flow with an accretion rate, . We define the following dimensionless parameters: , , , where and is the Eddington luminosity. The inclination angle of the line of sight to the symmetry axis is given by .

We refine here our previous study presented in X10 by including a fully GR hydrodynamical description of the flow. Our GR hydrodynamical model follows strictly M00, except for a small difference in the advective term, as noted below equation (2). We have thoroughly tested our hydrodynamical model by comparing it with the numerical code and results of Li et al. (2009), which work also follows M00. Other differences with respect to X10 involve:

(i) the vertical structure of the flow: we assume here that the temperature and velocity components are vertically uniform, while the density distribution is given by , where is the scale height at ; in X10 we assumed a tangentially uniform structure of the flow;

(ii) the direct viscous heating of electrons, which is neglected here and included in X10;

(iii) an outflow, neglected here and included (with a large magnitude) in X10.

We consider the pairs of the main parameters of (, ) and (, ), which correspond to low-luminosity AGNs and hard states of black-hole binaries, respectively. For each pair of (, ) we consider two values of the spin parameter, and . We assume the viscosity parameter of and the ratio of the gas pressure (electron and ion) to the total pressure of . The latter parameter determines the strength of the magnetic field in the accretion flow, and the synchrotron emission can then be determined. For it, we follow the method of Narayan & Yi (1995), which was applied also by M00 and X10.

We define the compressive heating rate of electrons per unit area (in the local reference frame) of the flow,

(1) |

and the rate (per unit area) of advection of the internal energy of electrons,

(2) |

where is the mass density and is the electron pressure in the midplane, is the effective adiabatic index [see, e.g., eq. (62) in M00 for the definition]; for simplicity of notation we hereafter skip the ’e’ subscripts in symbols denoting electron heating/cooling rates. Note that in our definition . Then, is always positive (therefore, we define it as a heating term) as the density gradient is always negative in our models. In all models, is negative (representing the release of internal energy) in the innermost region, at larger distances it is positive (the internal energy is stored) or vanishes. Following the usual notation, we define also the electron advection rate, , which is typically negative (i.e. the advective effects result in effective heating) except for an outer (beyond , see below) region in the local models. The above forms of and follow directly from eqs. (54) and (60) in M00. We do not use the simplifying approximation, , adopted in M00; we checked that it yields deviations of the advective term from the actual values by a factor of a few.

With the above definitions, the electron energy equation is

(3) |

where is the radiative cooling rate per unit area (including synchrotron, , and bremsstrahlung, , and their Comptonization, ) and is the electron heating rate per unit area by ions via Coulomb collisions.

The values of , and integrated over the whole body of the flow are denoted by , and , respectively. Due to the effect of capturing by the black hole and the gravitational redshift (see Section 3.3.3 for details), the total power radiated by the flow, , is higher than the luminosity, , detected far away from the flow.

For completeness we give also the ion energy equation:

(4) |

where the compressive heating and the advection of the internal energy of ions, respectively, are given by

(5) |

and the viscous dissipation rate, per unit area, is given by

(6) |

where , is the ion pressure, is the ion adiabatic index, is the angular velocity of the flow, is the Lorentz factor of the azimuthal motion and . The above form of results from the usual assumption that the viscous stress is proportional to the total pressure, with the proportionality coefficient ; cf. eqs. (48) and (54) in M00. This is almost certainly an oversimplified approach; see Gammie & Popham (1998) for a discussion of various issues related to implementing a proper description of the viscous stress in GR models. The magneto-rotational instability (MRI) is now widely believed to be an origin of the viscous stress and numerical simulations of this process (e.g. Krolik, Hawley & Hirose 2005) show radial profiles of the stress which are different from analytic prescriptions considered in the accretion theory. The uncertainty regarding the form of the stress is the major shortcoming in attempts to develop an analytical description of accretion flows. The form of the viscous stress, , is assumed here for computational simplicity. It has an unphysical property of leading to a negative dissipation rate close to the event horizon in some cases. However, this particular weakness of our model appears to be not important for our results. Namely, we find that occurs at only in our models with ; in these models the heating of ions is strongly dominated by the compression work at . Therefore, details of the viscous heating of ions do not affect the flow structure. Clearly, the accuracy of would be much more important in models taking into account direct viscous heating of electrons.

Our modelling of Comptonization makes use of a Monte Carlo (MC) method taking into account all effects relevant for the Kerr metric (Niedźwiecki 2005; see also Niedźwiecki & Zdziarski 2006 and X10). The seed photons are generated from synchrotron and bremsstrahlung radial emissivities of the flow, taking into account the vertical profile of the density; their transfer and energy gains in consecutive scatterings are affected by both the special relativistic and gravitational effects.

The MC Comptonization simulation and the solution of structure equations are treated separately in our model. Therefore, we have to iterate between their results to find a mutually consistent solution. In principle, a full set of hydrodynamical equations should be solved after each MC simulation, as in X10. However, in the current study we apply a slightly simplified procedure, motivated by the fact that the structure of the flow is fully determined by the ion energy equation (this condition is, however, satisfied only within inner several hundred , see below), while the electron energy equation determines the electron temperature. Under such conditions, our procedure of refining the description of Compton cooling should affect only the electron temperature and not the other flow parameters (, , , and the velocity field). Then, we first solve the dynamical structure with a local approximation of Compton cooling and then we iterate between the MC Comptonization results and the solutions of the electron energy equation, keeping the flow parameters, except for , unchanged. After each MC simulation, we determine the radially-dependent Compton cooling. We then use this rate to solve the energy equation (3), taking into account the dependence of all relevant processes (synchrotron and bremsstrahlung emissivities, Coulomb exchange rate, advective terms) on . We repeat the above procedure until it converges.

For the initial solution, the outer boundary of the flow is set at (see section 2.4 in M00 for details). The MC simulations are performed within , using the hydrodynamical solution at ; note that details of this inner part of the solution should not depend on the outer boundary condition (see e.g. fig. 5 in Narayan, Kato & Honma 1997). For our final solution, we balance the electron energy equation up to . Due to boundary effects in MC simulation, combined with strong sensitivity of the advective term on the temperature gradient, the solution is very unstable at close to . Furthermore, we note that an assumption underlying our computational procedure fails in these outer regions. Namely, all our final solutions are characterised by an electron temperature larger (typically by a factor of at ) than the initial solutions and the electron pressure can give a non-negligible contribution beyond several hundred . In that region, the scale height would increase, which effect is not taken into account here; however, we expect it to be a rather minor, per cent, effect – such a change of was found, in response to a similar in magnitude (but opposite) change of , in X10. For one set of parameters, namely , and , approaches at , so the flow loses a two-temperature structure. We skip here more careful investigation of the outer region because it gives a negligible contribution to the observed radiation. Furthermore, a detailed study of the outer region should involve a proper description of additional, poorly understood effects (like a mechanism of transition from an optically thick disc to a tenuous flow; e.g., in hard states such a transition is likely to occur at ) which are beyond the scope of this paper.

## 3 Results

Figs 1 and 2 show the change of the heating and cooling rates, and the electron temperature, between our initial and final solutions. Figs 3 and 4 show the remaining parameters of the flow – these are assumed to be the same in the initial and final solutions. We can clearly see how the value of the spin parameter, , affects the flow properties. Rotation of the black hole stabilizes the circular motion of the innermost part of the flow (an effect directly related with properties of test particle motion, analogous to the well-known dependence of the innermost stable orbit on in Keplerian discs) which yields a higher density (through the continuity equation). This, in turn, implies both a stronger Coulomb coupling (see Figs 1f and 2f) and a larger optical depth (see Figs 3a and 4a) in the innermost region in models with . On the other hand, heating by the compression work is typically stronger than, or comparable to, heating by the Coulomb energy transfer from ions (cf. Nakamura et al. 1997, Mahadevan & Quataert 1997), which effect partly reduces the differences between the high and low models. These effects, and their impact on the radiative properties of the flow, are discussed in detail below.

Figs 1(f) and 2(f) show also the dissipative heating rate of ions, . The stabilized rotation results in a much stronger dissipative heating in the inner region for , however, this property is rather unimportant for effects investigated in this paper (neglecting both the direct heating of electrons and hadronic processes).

### 3.1 Initial solutions

We discuss here in some details the initial solutions although they are not self-consistent, because most of models available in literature use the same local approximation for Comptonization. Moreover, we amend some conclusions regarding the accuracy of local approximations, derived previously in X10. We find the initial solutions using the prescription for the Compton cooling rate in a slab geometry with initial photon energies of 1 eV, given in Dermer et al. (1991; hereafter D91). In X10, we found that it gives a reasonably good approximation for the innermost region. For the models considered here, the slab approximation appears to be less accurate, however, our choice of the slab case allows for a direct comparison with previous studies, a number of which used the slab approximation based on D91, or its modification introduced in Esin et al. (1996).

Figs 1(a,c) and 2(a,c) show the heating and cooling rates in the initial solution. Comptonization of synchrotron photons is the most efficient radiative cooling process. However, the synchrotron emissivity decreases rapidly beyond its transition radius, ( for and for ). Then, in the local model, the radiative cooling at is dominated by the (much weaker) bremsstrahlung and its Comptonization. Then, two regions can be distinguished in terms of the electron energy equation (ions are always advection dominated). (i) At , the flow is adiabatically compressed, which is reflected in the increase of with decreasing (see Figs 1e and 2e); both the radiative cooling and the Coulomb heating are much weaker than the advective terms. (ii) At , the radiative cooling becomes efficient and decreases; the Coulomb heating is more efficient in this region and it exceeds the compression work in the innermost part (except for the model with and ). In this region, the advection of the internal energy contributes also to the heating of electrons, however, this effect is rather weak.

The solid curves in Figs 1(a,c) and 2(a,c) show the GR global Compton cooling rate obtained in our initial MC simulations, i.e. with the satisfying the energy equation (3) with the Compton cooling rate, , given by the local slab (D91) prescription. As we can see, there are significant deviations between the local (dotted curves) and global cooling rates, resulting from several effects. Two of these effects should be generic to models of black-hole flows regardless of specific values of parameters of the flow. First, the input of seed photons from the inner region strongly enhances the Compton cooling beyond . The second one involves the presence of the event horizon (neglected in the local approximation). The presence of an inner boundary of the flow at the event horizon results in an obvious difference with respect to the semi-infinite slab; namely, a large fraction of photons generated in the innermost region is captured, reducing the input of seed photons.

Another effect affecting the structure of the flow is the dependence of the optical depth from a given point on direction. This strongly depends on the flow parameters and assumptions about heating and outflow. In particular, the flows for our parameters have the optical depth from a point in the equatorial plane along the outward radial direction, , similar to the vertical one, , at any , whereas in the model of X10. Furthermore, for , both and are much smaller than the optical depth in the inward radial direction, , except for the very innermost region; in these models ( for and for ) at . For , ( for and for ) at ; in these models the difference between and typically does not exceed a factor of 2. Then, for a non-rotating black hole, the local radiative properties would be more accurately described by the spherical geometry, while for a rapidly rotating black hole the local properties are intermediate between the sphere and the slab. Then, the assumption of the slab geometry overestimates the initial cooling rate in all models considered here.

Finally, as we note in X10, the D91 formula is accurate for only two values of seed photon energies, 1 eV and 1 keV, and we use here the lower one. With this value, the formula gives a reasonable approximation for flows around a stellar black hole, where seed photons have energies eV. For flows around a supermassive black hole, however, with typical seed photon energies of eV (for ), it underestimates the cooling rate. Specifically, for this we found deviations by a factor of between the formula of D91 for 1 eV and the results of our local slab MC simulation using the exact energy distribution of seed photons (given by the synchrotron and bremsstrahlung emission distributions; see X10 for the description of our local MC model).

### 3.2 Self-consistent solutions

The initial solutions are qualitatively similar at both values of considered here, the most significant dependence on involves the increase of the value of with increasing . In contrary, detailed properties of the self-consistent, final solutions are more sensitive to .

Figs 1(b,d) show the heating and cooling rates of the final solutions for . At , a significant fraction of the power heating electrons is stored as their internal energy rather than radiated away. This is qualitatively similar to the initial solution, although is larger at in the global cooling model and hence is smaller than in the local cooling model; therefore, the temperature gradient is smaller in the outer region in our final solutions (see discussion below). We note that the strong contribution of the term significantly complicates the procedure for finding the self-consistent solution at this lower , as both the global Compton cooling and the electron advection are strongly sensitive to, and affect, the electron temperature profile.

Fig. 1(e) shows the electron temperature profiles for the initial and the final solutions. We see that, in the final solution, increases compared to the initial solution, by a factor of in the inner region, and up to a factor of 3 at several hundred . The increase of at is an obvious effect, related with the overestimation of the cooling rate by the slab approximation, combined with - crucial in that region - capturing of seed photons by the black hole, as discussed in Section 3.1. Somewhat surprisingly, the global solution requires higher also at , where the global radiative cooling is significantly enhanced. The temperature must remain high in this outer region because the energy balance could not be achieved for decreasing too rapidly. Namely, we found that such a (too rapid) decrease of temperature at would yield a large positive term in the electron energy equation (3), which, added to the (increased in global cooling) term, could not be balanced by the heating terms. We emphasise that this property is related to strong contribution of advective terms and it should not necessarily occur in the whole range of parameters, in particular at higher accretion rates.

For (Fig. 2), the self-consistent is higher in the innermost part than in the initial solution, due to the same reasons as for . However, the Compton cooling is relatively more important in the outer region, which results in an approximately isothermal structure at ; in particular, we do not find a local maximum of , marking the transition (at ) from an adiabatically compressed flow to an efficiently cooled flow in global solutions with and in all our local solutions. The temperature at which the energy balance is achieved is twice lower for , due to a much larger input of seed photons from the central region.

The strong contribution of the compressive heating has crucial consequences for the radiative efficiency, , where is the total observed luminosity of the flow, and for its scaling with . We compare here our models with the same for different , although we note that they have also different , which may slightly affect such a comparison (the main dependence on the value of concerns the energy of synchrotron photons, influencing the cooling rate). Comparing our results for and 0.5, we find that the fraction of an accretion power transferred to electrons via Coulomb collisions varies approximately as for and for we note even stronger dependence on . Then, heating dominated by the Coulomb coupling would lead to an approximately linear scaling of the radiative efficiency with , as derived in previous works on this subject (see, e.g., eq. 12 and references in Narayan & McClintock 2008; see also table 3 in Rajesh & Mukhopadhyay 2010). However, is much less dependent, moreover negatively, on ; specifically, it is higher by a factor of for than for . As a result, the dependence of on is significantly reduced.

For , at and at . The decrease of with increasing is partially balanced by the increased contribution of Coulomb heating. Two further effects decrease the radiative efficiency at lower : (1) the increase of the fraction of the energy given to electrons which is not radiated away (and increases the internal energy advected with the flow), and (2) the increase of the fraction of photons captured by the black hole (Section 3.3.3). As a result, the radiative efficiency for is approximately the same for both considered values of . More specifically, (with erg s and ) for and ( erg s and ) for .

For , exceeds at both and 0.5. Radiative efficiencies at these differ only by a factor of 2, due to relatively stronger contribution of compressive heating at and very strong reduction of the observed by GR effects (Section 3.3.3) at . Specifically, for , ( erg s and ) and for , ( erg s and ). We note that for the apparent luminosity depends on , see Section 3.3.4, and the above values of are averaged over all viewing angles.

Figs 5(a) and 6(a) show the angle-averaged spectra for the initial and final solution. In all models, the normalization of the spectra of the final solution is much higher than that of the initial solution, due to the increase of the synchrotron emissivity resulting from the increase of . The X-ray spectra are relatively hard, with the photon index , for both (, ) and (, ) and for (, ); the last value is determined in the 2–10 keV range, as at higher energies a rather pronounced Wien peak leads to further hardening of the spectrum. For (, ), the relativistic and small optical depth result in pronounced scattering bumps seen in this model spectrum; the average slope in the 2–200 keV range is . Thus, we see that the spectra harden with the increasing luminosity, for increasing from 0.1 to 0.5, from to at and from to at .

In all models, the spectra have the maxima at several hundred keV. The electron temperature reaches the maximum values of MeV for and keV for .

Note, however, that although these flows produce photons with energies , we do not expect an efficient e pair production in photon-photon collisions. The probability that a -ray produces a pair is approximately given by the compactness parameter for this process, , where is the radiative power in photons with keV produced within . It is for all in all models except for and , where in the innermost few . The same conclusion was reached in previous studies of pair equilibria in advection-dominated flows (e.g. Esin 1999) where additional pair creation processes, namely electron-electron and photon-particle collisions, were also taken into account.

### 3.3 Effects of black hole rotation

The nature of the space-time metric (specified by the value of ) affects the radiative properties of hot flows through various effects. As noted above, the stabilized circular motion results in a much larger density in the innermost region in models with large . This affects the radiative efficiency in a manner discussed in Section 3.2; here we restate some of these results with the emphasis on the dependence on . Two further effects, discussed in Sections 3.3.3–3.3.4, concern the properties of photon motion in curved space-time.

#### 3.3.1 Heating

Higher density implies a stronger Coulomb coupling for large . For , is smaller than for by a factor of 200 and 35 for and 0.5, respectively. The difference between the heating of electrons for high and low is, however, strongly reduced by the high efficiency of compression, which shows very weak dependence on the value of . Then, the total heating, , is higher in models with only by a factor of 3.5 () and 16 (). Extrapolating our results we can expect that at the difference between the heating efficiencies in high and low models vanishes.

#### 3.3.2 Optical depth

Higher density implies also a larger optical depth for large . Then, despite a stronger heating in these models, the energy balance in the innermost region is achieved at smaller electron temperatures than for small . On the hand, the highly efficient Comptonization occurs at very small , therefore, a much more centrally concentrated emissivity of Comptonized radiation is achieved in models with and the observed luminosity is subject to stronger reduction by GR effects, discussed below.

#### 3.3.3 Collimation and capturing of radiation

Different velocity fields result in a different strength of collimation toward the black hole horizon. In principle, larger values of the radial velocity, , imply a stronger collimation for , which could give rise to a larger fraction of photons being captured by the black hole. However, the radiation is produced, on average, at a smaller radial distance for and, therefore, the reduction of the observed luminosity due to GR effects, including the photon capture and the gravitational redshift, turns out to be larger in that case. Specifically, in models with , for and 0.3 for ; the large reduction for results from (and trapping of photons) in the central region. For , (for ) and 0.9 (for ; in this case the emissivity profile is flatter).

#### 3.3.4 Intrinsic anisotropy

For high values of , effects unique for the Kerr metric, i.e. bending of photon trajectories to the equatorial plane combined with a dependence of the gravitational shift of energy on the direction of photon escape, result in an intrinsic anisotropy of radiation produced within the innermost few (see Piran & Shaham 1977, Niedźwiecki 2005). The Comptonized component from that region is softer (i.e. has a larger spectral index and a smaller cut-off energy) and has a smaller normalization when observed at a smaller . The gravitational effects, underlying this property, are strong only within , then, the magnitude of the anisotropy in the total spectrum depends on the proportion between contributions from the innermost and the surrounding (beyond ) regions.

Figs 5(b) and 6(b) show the -dependence of the observed spectra in our models with (in models with the dependence on is negligible). As we can see, the spectra indeed show some anisotropy but the effect is relatively moderate. For , the total flux emitted face-on (–1) and edge-on (–0.1) corresponds to the isotropic luminosity of and erg s, respectively. In this model, the compressive heating results in a rather flat emissivity profile, then, mixing of relatively weak contribution from with radiation produced at more distant regions washes out the anisotropic properties. For , the face-on and edge-on fluxes correspond to erg s and erg s, respectively. In this model, the emissivity is strongly centrally concentrated; however, the optical depth of the inner region is large and a large fraction of photons produced there get reprocessed at larger distances or captured. At both , the spectral indices differ by between a face-on and an edge-on observer.

We expect that a much larger anisotropy would be produced in a model with moderate (yielding ) and strong direct heating of electrons (giving a very centrally concentrated emissivity).

### 3.4 Illumination by an outer disc

An optically thick disc may extend to relatively low radii in some objects observed at similar to these characterising our models. The best example concerns XTE J1118+480, in which the derived truncation radius of the outer cold disc is (Esin et al. 2001). We consider here the cooling of the inner hot flow due to Comptonization of thermal photons emitted by such a surrounding, cold disc. For this we take the innermost part, within , of our self-consistent solutions described in Section 3.2. We use our MC method to compute the Comptonization of the seed photons emitted by a cold, Keplerian disc extending from to . The local black-body temperature of its thermal emission is found using Page & Thorne (1974); note that this approach gives the largest possible luminosity of the outer disc as it involves the assumption that the rate of the outward transport of mechanical energy, which is the dominant source of the radiated energy at , is the same as in an untruncated Keplerian disc. We do not look for self-consistent solutions including this additional source of seed photons. Instead, we compute the total rate of the Compton cooling by the outer disc photons, , and compare it with the total Compton cooling rate due to the synchrotron and bremsstrahlung emission, , of our self-consistent solutions.

We find that in models with the effect is small, with , and for it is negligible, . We note that the weakness of this effects results from the following properties. First, the total luminosity of the disc truncated at is relatively small (specifically, it is approximately equal to the luminosity of the hot flow). Second, the solid angle subtended by the flow as seen by the outer disc is rather small. Third, the optical thickness of the outer parts of the flow is very small at the values of considered here, so a small fraction of photons illuminating the flow get scattered.

Our results are consistent with the conclusion of Esin et al. (2001) that the outer disc is not an important source for Compton cooling in this range of parameters. Obviously, the effect would be more important for a smaller truncation radius (cf. Esin 1997), at which the luminosity of the disc would be larger, as well as at higher , at which a larger fraction of photons irradiating the flow would be scattered.

### 3.5 Comparison with previous works

Most of the specific properties discussed in this paper have been studied in previous works. However, their quantitative importance could not be assessed properly as neither of previous studies considered self-consistently all relevant effects.

The solution of a hot-flow structure based on a self-similar model (e.g., Narayan & Yi 1995) is commonly used due to its relative simplicity. However, this simple solution introduces inaccuracies of up to an order of magnitude even for the basic flow parameters (e.g., the density given by eq. 1 in Mahadevan & Quataert (1997) is times larger than the density in our solutions), which leads to further inaccuracies in papers based on this model; e.g., we find that compressive heating dominates over Coulomb heating at much higher accretion rates than the critical value given by eq. (35) in Mahadevan & Quataert (1997).

Gammie & Popham (1998) and Popham & Gammie (1998) presented an extensive study of various aspects of GR hydrodynamical description of a flow in the Kerr metric and they show that the black hole spin has a large effect on the velocity field, density and temperature of the flow (in ways also discussed in the present paper); however, their study neglected radiative processes, so a more detailed impact on the observed spectrum could not be established.

Manmoto, Mineshige & Kusunose (1997) included an explicit description of radiative processes with local approximation of Compton cooling in a pseudo-relativistic model. The same model including outflows and direct electron heating was used by Yuan et al. (2003, 2005). Then, M00 improved such models by including a fully GR treatment of the hydrodynamical processes (but still with local approximation of Compton cooling). We have fully reproduced their results in our initial solutions; the accuracy of these models is directly illustrated by comparison of our initial and final (global) solutions.

In an alternative (to MC) method for the treatment of global Comptonization in an optically thin flow, developed by Narayan, Barret & McClintock (1997), the flow is divided into a set of nested spherical shells and the iterative scattering method is used to describe their mutual interactions. The model was used, e.g. by Esin, McClintock & Narayan (1997), Quataert & Narayan (1999) and Esin et al. (2001). Neither of these papers presents any details which could allow us to compare our cooling rates and only the produced spectra can be compared. The results of Esin et al. (2001), who use the GR hydrodynamical model from Gammie & Popham (1998) and include the special relativistic effects and the gravitational redshift in the calculation of radiative processes, is of particular interest for such a comparison. It appears that the model of Narayan et al. (1997) yields a higher cooling rate than our Monte Carlo model, as the spectrum computed in Esin et al. (2001) for parameters similar to these in our models (see the solid curve in their fig. 1) has a break energy at keV, significantly lower than our model spectra. We do not know the cause of this difference.

Among previous studies of hot flows, the fully GR ADAF model of Kurpiewski & Jaroszyński (1999, 2000), with a MC computation of global Comptonization, seems to be the closest to our present work. Their spectra show a much stronger dependence on , see e.g. figure 4 in Kurpiewski & Jaroszyński (2000), which may be due to their values of significantly smaller than in our models.

Yuan et al. (2009) used an iteration method, similar to ours but with a different approach to computing global Comptonization, to find the radiative cooling rate mutually consistent between the dynamics and radiation of the flow in a non GR model including strong outflows and electron heating. Taking into account significant differences between the results of our present work and X10, pointed out below, we speculate that GR flows with a different strength of these two effects may be characterised by different critical accretion rates, and different maximum luminosities, than those found in the model of Yuan et al. (2009).

Finally, we compare our results with the pseudo-relativistic model of X10. First, we note that models based on the pseudo-Newtonian potential fail to properly describe the innermost region even for the case. Specifically, the pseudo-relativistic model predicts a decrease of the optical depth at (see the dot-dashed curve in fig. 2b in X10) while the fully GR model with the same parameters (see our Fig. 3a) yields the optical depth monotonically increasing with decreasing . The reason for this discrepancy can be traced to the (unphysically) large radial velocity in the pseudo-relativistic model, formally exceeding at small , which implies a much smaller density than that in the GR model.

Second, in the present work we use the equation for vertical equilibrium in the form derived for the Kerr metric by Abramowicz, Lanza & Percival (1997). In X10 we used its simplified version, , where is the sound speed and is the Keplerian angular velocity, and we note significant differences in scale heights derived in these two approaches. Specifically, the equation from Abramowicz et al. (1997) yields a larger scale height, up to a factor of , for the flow parameters describing our models.

Third, additional effects included in X10, namely the strong outflow and direct viscous heating of electrons affect the flow structure in a complex manner and lead to a qualitatively different effect of taking into account the global nature of the Comptonization process. Obviously, the outflow leads to a reduction of at small . Therefore, is much smaller, by a factor of at , in the model of X10 than in our present model with and (which parameters are the same as those in X10). Then, the outflow reduces the compressive heating of ions via reducing the density gradient, and the direct heating of the electrons reduces the viscous heating of ions. Also, the outflow reduces the viscous heating rate per unit volume, flattening its radial profile, but the viscous heating rate per ion remains unchanged. We note that the compressive heating of ions exceeds their viscous heating in our models, and it is much larger, by a factor of , than the compressive heating of electrons. Together, both reductions of the ion heating cause a reduction of , which, in turn, leads to a decrease of by per cent (with respect to the pseudo-relativistic model without both an outflow and electron heating) within the innermost several .

The simplified hydrostatic equilibrium condition together with the outflow and electron heating considered in X10 yield a much smaller than our present model (compare our Fig. 4b with fig. 3b in X10). As a result, in spite of the strong mass loss to the outflow, the total radial optical depth in the model of X10 is still higher than that in our model with and . Also, the radial optical depth of X10 is much larger than ; then, the geometry of the flow resembles that of a slab.

Fourth, comparing the radiative efficiencies of the X10 model and the present one with , illustrates the strong impact of the direct heating of electrons. Namely, in X10 the value of is three times larger, although most of the potential energy of the flow is lost to the outflow in their model.

### 3.6 Strength of magnetic field and electron heating

We discuss here briefly our assumption on the strength of the magnetic field as well as our neglect of the viscous heating of electrons. Our assumption of rather weak magnetic field, with the magnetic pressure of , is supported by results of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations in which amplification of magnetic fields by the MRI typically saturates at such a ratio of the magnetic to the total pressure (e.g. Machida, Nakamura & Matsumoto 2004 and references therein). It is rather easy to assess changes of the flow structure and the spectrum resulting from a change of this assumption. Namely, a stronger magnetic field would result in a stronger synchrotron emission and this would cause a decrease of the electron temperature and a softening of the Comptonization spectrum (see, e.g., Esin et al. 1997).

An issue of the direct viscous heating of electrons is more uncertain. Current applications of ADAF models typically assume large values of electron heating to total heating, (e.g., Yuan et al. 2003), however, the model has a degeneracy between the value of and the strength of an outflow (Quataert & Narayan 1999). Various attempts to assess this effect on theoretical grounds seem to favour small values of for weak magnetic fields and rather high , which are considered in our models. Analytic investigation of particle heating by MHD turbulence in ADAFs indicates that the turbulence primarily heats protons for weak magnetic fields, while electrons are primarily heated for strong magnetic fields (see Quataert & Gruzinov 1999). However, large uncertainties in the division between electron and proton heating result from uncertainties in the description of the turbulence; , assumed in our models, may correspond to the values of between and 0.6 (see fig. 2 in Quataert & Gruzinov 1999). Details of another potential mechanism of electron heating discussed by Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Lovelace (1997) and Quataert & Gruzinov (1999), i.e. reconnection, remain even more uncertain.

Simulations of MRI turbulence by Sharma et al. (2007) indicate that pressure anisotropy, created in turbulent plasmas, may give an additional mechanism for particle heating; they approximate the fraction of the viscous energy which heats electrons as . However, their model assumes a fully collisionless plasma, which approximation is valid only for . At higher accretion rates, Coulomb collisions suppress the electron pressure anisotropy and electron heating is negligible. Then, their prescription for seems to be not relevant for our models.

We note that the direct viscous heating would exceed the Coulomb and compressive heating of electrons for in models with , and for in models with . For these values of , flows should have larger luminosities than these assessed in our models. We can also expect that flows with such values of produce harder X-ray spectra, with higher cut-off energies, than obtained in our models. However, we note also that large values of , for which the heating of ions is significantly reduced, may have a strong impact on the flow structure, especially if a strong outflow is also present, which may lead to enhanced global Compton cooling (as discussed in Section 3.5). Then, the above simple estimation of spectral changes related to the increase of may be incorrect; in particular, we note that the spectrum obtained in our model with in X10 has a smaller cut-off energy than our spectra computed here with .

## 4 Comparison with observations

### 4.1 FR I radio galaxies

A substantial observational evidence indicates that accretion flows typically proceed through a radiatively-inefficient mode below a characteristic luminosity of in AGNs (e.g., Ho 2008; see Yuan 2007 for a review on the applications of hot flow models to low luminosity AGNs). FR I radio galaxies make an interesting class of objects observed at such luminosities. They do not show signs of the presence of an optically thick accretion disc (e.g., Chiaberge, Capetti & Celotti 1999). Remarkably, an average radiative efficiency, , estimated for FR Is by Balmaverde, Baldi & Capetti (2008) is consistent with the values of obtained in most of our solutions.

According to our results, hot flows with relevant accretion rates should produce rather hard spectra, extending to MeV energies. Then, MeV observations are crucial for verification whether the high energy component is produced by the thermal Comptonization in a hot flow; however, the present data quality in this energy range is too poor for most objects to allow for such analysis.

Thanks to its proximity, Centaurus A is the best studied FR I radio galaxy, suitable for detailed testing of various accretion models through modelling of its broadband spectrum. Its X-ray luminosity (, see below, where is the 2–10 keV luminosity) satisfies the criterion, suggested in Wu, Yuan & Cao (2007), for a FR I galaxy to be dominated by a hot flow rather than a jet emission, of . Indeed, many works attributed its spectral components to emission from accretion flow (e.g. Evans et al. 2004; Whysong & Antonucci 2004; Meisenheimer et al. 2007) although they can also be explained in terms of jet models (e.g. Abdo et al. 2010). Below we briefly compare predictions of our model with the observed properties of the X-ray emission in Cen A.

(i) Luminosity. Over the last decade, Cen A was typically observed with the unabsorbed X-ray luminosity of erg s (e.g. Evans et al. 2004, Markowitz et al. 2007). Our model with and gives erg s (assuming ), which is approximately consistent with the average observed taking into account recent estimates of its black-hole mass of (e.g. Häring-Neumayer et al. 2006), which is times smaller than assumed in our model. Also for and we get a roughly consistent erg s.

(ii) Spectral index. The time-averaged spectral index of the X-ray emission is –1.8 (Beckmann et al. 2011, Rothschild et al. 2011). The model spectrum for is slightly harder, . The average slope for is roughly consistent with the observed one, but this model spectrum has pronounced scattering bumps, which have not been observed in Cen A.

(iii) High energy cut-off. Cen A is the only FR I galaxy with data at MeV energies. Steinle et al. (1998) have found a spectral break in the –1.8 spectrum at 150 keV. Another power law spectral component was found above the break up to the MeV range. Grandi et al. (2003) and Beckmann et al. (2011) fitted the hard X-ray spectra by an e-folded power law and found e-folding energies of 500 keV, which is roughly compatible with the break energy of 150 keV. Rothschild et al. measured the power law spectrum up to 200 keV, within which energy range there was no indication for a break or cut-off.

(iv) Variability. The spectral index remains roughly unchanged while varies by a factor of 3 (Rothschild et al. 2011). In our model, changes of can be attributed to changes of a few different parameters, namely, the strength of the magnetic field, the fraction of accretion power directly heating electrons or the accretion rate. The results of our current study allow us to assess only effects related to changing of (which case is most commonly considered as the explanation of luminosity variations), and we note that the model predicts a small change of the photon index, by , corresponding to the change of by a factor 10. This appears to be compatible with the reported spectral variability within –1.8 only.

In summary, our model can reproduce most of the properties of the X-ray emission in Cen A. However, it is inconsistent with the relatively low observed value of the break energy of keV. Furthermore, the model predicts a slightly harder spectrum than that observed. However, an additional process, which would lead to a softening of the spectrum and a decrease of the cut-off energy, has to be included in the model with . Namely, an efficient nonthermal synchrotron emission from relativistic e, coming from the decay of charged pions copiously produced through proton-proton collisions in a flow around a rapidly rotating black hole, where K, would provide a strong seed photon input in addition to the thermal synchrotron emission. However, we leave a more detailed comparison of the spectrum observed from Cen A with the hot flow model spectra to a future work, in which we will take into account the relevant hadronic processes.

### 4.2 Hard spectral states

Black-hole binaries in the hard spectral state have typical X-ray photon spectra (measured typically in the 3–10 keV range) of –2 (e.g., Zdziarski & Gierliński 2004; McClintock & Remillard 2006). In luminous spectral states, or so, the high energy cut-offs in those spectra occur at energies –200 keV (e.g., Grove et al. 1998; Wardziński et al. 2002; Zdziarski & Gierliński 2004), as measured by the position of the spectral turnover in spectra.

Thus, the X-ray slope of our model spectra, –1.7, is in the range of the observed values. On the other hand, the high-energy turnovers in our spectra are at keV, which is higher than the values observed. However, our models have –, which is lower than at which most of the spectral cut-offs have been measured. When measured, the cut-off energy has been found to increase with the decreasing luminosity (Wardziński et al. 2002; Yamaoka et al. 2006; Miyakawa et al. 2008), and thus it is possible that the cut-off energy is at 500 keV in some low- hard states.

The value of the X-ray photon index shows a negative correlation with the luminosity in luminous hard states of black-hole binaries, at or so, i.e., the spectra soften with the increasing . However, the correlation changes its sign at low , where the spectra soften with the decreasing (e.g., Corbel et al. 2004; Zdziarski et al. 2004; Yuan et al. 2007; Wu & Gu 2008; Sobolewska et al. 2011).

As pointed out by Sobolewska et al. (2011), this indicates a change in the physical nature of the X-ray source at a luminosity of a fraction of a per cent. Those authors discuss two scenarios explaining this change. One is that the emission is dominated by an accretion flow at high , and by a nonthermal jet radiation (most likely synchrotron) at low . This scenario for the black-hole binary XTE J1550–564 is discussed by Russell et al. (2010), who found the near-infrared/optical ( Hz) emission is tightly correlated with X-rays at low , but not at high . A potential problem for this model is presented by the fact that basically the same - correlation, negative at low and positive at high is observed in AGNs. The transition is at or so, about the same as in black-hole binaries (e.g., Gu & Cao 2009; Constantin et al. 2009; Younes et al. 2011; Veledina et al. 2011). The magnetic field in jets in black-hole sources is expected to scale as (e.g., Heinz & Sunyaev 2003), which (since the cyclotron frequency is ) very strongly affects the jet emission, leading, in particular, to the strong mass dependence of the relative strength of the jet emission at a given frequency (Merloni, Heinz & Di Matteo 2003). Thus, it appears highly unlikely that the X-ray jet emission would start to dominate the accretion-flow emission below about the same Eddington ratio in both black-hole binaries and AGNs (see also Yuan & Cui 2005; Yuan, Yu & Ho 2009).

The second possibility explaining the form of the - correlation discussed by Sobolewska et al. (2011), and independently by Veledina et al. (2011), is that it is due to a change of the character of the dominant seed photons for Comptonization. The overall idea follows the model for spectral changes of black-hole binaries developed by Esin et al. (1997, 1998), whose model did predict the changing - correlation, see, e.g, fig. 1 in Esin et al. (1998). At high , above the transition , the seed photons are likely to be from an optically-thick disc overlapping with the hot flow. There is a lot of observational evidence for the presence of an outer cold disc in luminous hard states (as summarized by Done, Gierliński & Kubota 2007), e.g., a strong correlation of with the relative strength of Compton reflection (Zdziarski, Lubiński & Smith 1999). Also, the inner disc radius decreases with the increasing (e.g., Done et al. 2007). This naturally explains the positive - correlation, since the resulting increasing overlap between the cold disc and the hot flow leads to both an increase of the strength of Compton reflection and increased cooling of the Comptonizing plasma, resulting in softening of the X-ray spectra. However, at low , the outer disc may be truncated far away, and the dominant source of seed photons for Comptonization becomes synchrotron emission, as in the models studied in this work as well as in the ADAF model in general (Narayan & Yi 1995). This model can also explain the correlation of the X-rays with the near-infrared/optical emission, which, in this scenario, would be from the ADAF flow, see Fig. 6.

As shown in Section 3.2, our models spectra do harden with the increasing , with for increasing by a factor of several. This strongly supports the suggestion of Sobolewska et al. (2011) that the negative - correlation seen at is due to the dominance of synchrotron seed photons in that regime. A hardening of the ADAF spectra with increasing , below a few per cent of , was studied previously by Esin et al. (1997); their model seems to predict a much stronger effect, with the increase of by a factor of 10 corresponding to . In this work, we have considered only two values of the accretion rate, and have not fully tested this model against observational data. We will consider this issue in detail in a paper in preparation.

We note that Oda et al. (2010) propose another possible explanation for the difference between the low and high luminosity hard states. It is a transition between two equilibrium states of an optically thin, two temperature flow with a weak and a strong magnetic field, respectively. Such a change of magnetic field is outside the scope of our model.

## 5 Conclusions

We have developed a fully GR model with global Compton scattering of hot, tenuous accretion flows. The dominant source of seed photons in our model is the synchrotron process. We assume that an outer, optically-thick, accretion disc is truncated at large radii, so irradiation of the hot flow by it is negligible. We have also neglected direct viscous electron heating and outflows. We have considered the accretion rates of and 0.5, for which our model gives the bolometric luminosities of –.

In this range of , we find our models predict X-ray spectra hardening with increasing , which is in agreement with the correlation observed at in both black-hole binaries in the hard state and AGNs. This is also in agreement with the suggestion of Sobolewska et al. (2011) that synchrotron seed photons dominate in this range of , whereas an optically-thick accretion disc overlapping with the hot flow provide dominant source of seed photons at higher .

We have compared our models to the low- FR I radio galaxy Cen A. We have found a good agreement with the observed X-ray spectral slope, but the position of the high-energy break, observed at 200 keV, is lower than the model cut-off energy. This may be possibly explained by the hadronic processes, which would be present if the black hole in this source has a high spin.

We have studied the impact of the black hole spin and we find that despite a very strong influence of this parameter on the dynamical properties of the inner part of the flow, the difference between the observed radiation from a flow surrounding a maximally rotating and a non-rotating black hole, with other parameters unchanged, is rather moderate. In particular, their luminosities differ only by a factor of 2–3 (i.e. smaller than a factor of in Keplerian discs). We find this is due to a strong role of the compressive electron heating, which process only weakly depends on the black-hole spin. We note, however, that a much larger dependence on the spin value is expected in models involving direct heating of electrons, or taking into account hadronic processes.

We stress that a proper treatment of global Compton scattering is crucial for accurate modelling of the flow structure, most importantly, for the electron temperature profile, and for the spectral formation in optically thin flows. In models with , we find the entire inner flow is efficiently cooled by Comptonization when the non-local nature of this process is taken into account. At , global Comptonization is important, but also electron advection effects are strong at , giving rise to large temperature gradients. As compared to the results with the global Comptonization, the local model assuming a slab geometry provides in general a very poor approximation, overestimating the cooling rate by an order of magnitude in the innermost region.

## Acknowledgments

We thank the referee and F. Yuan for valuable comments. This research has been supported in part by the Polish NCN grants N N203 582240, N N203 581240, N N203 404939 and 362/1/N-INTEGRAL/2008/09/0. FGX thanks Dr. Yan-Rong Li (IHEP) for discussions and sharing his GR disc code for comparisons. FGX has been supported in part by NSFC (grants 10973003 and 10843007) and NBRPC (grants 2009CB824800 and 2009CB24901).

## References

- [1] Abdo A. A., et al., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1433
- [2] Abramowicz M. A., Lanza A., Percival M. J., 1997, ApJ, 479, 179
- [3] Balmaverde B., Baldi R. D., Capetti A., 2008, A&A, 486, 119
- [4] Beckmann V., Jean P., Lubiński P., Soldi S., Terrier R., 2011, A&A, 531, 70
- [5] Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Lovelace R. V. E., 1997, ApJ, 486, L43
- [6] Chiaberge M., Capetti A., Celotti A., 1999, A&A, 349, 77
- [7] Constantin A., Green P., Aldcroft T., Kim D.-W., Haggard D., Barkhouse W., Anderson S. F., 2009, ApJ, 705, 1336
- [8] Corbel S., Fender R. P., Tomsick J. A., Tzioumis A. K., Tingay S., 2004, ApJ, 617, 1272
- [9] Dermer C. D., Liang E. P. Canfield E., 1991, ApJ, 369, 410 (D91)
- [10] Done C., Gierliński M., Kubota A., 2007, A&ARv, 15, 1
- [11] Esin A., 1997, ApJ, 482, 400
- [12] Esin A., 1999, ApJ, 517, 381
- [13] Esin A., Narayan R., Ostriker E., Yi I., 1996, ApJ, 465, 312
- [14] Esin A., McClintock J. E. Narayan R., 1997, ApJ, 489, 865
- [15] Esin A., Narayan R., Cui W., Grove J. E., Zhang S.-N., 1998, ApJ, 505, 854
- [16] Esin A., et al., 2001, ApJ, 555, 483
- [17] Evans D., et al., 2004, ApJ, 612, 786
- [18] Gammie C. F., Popham R., 1998, ApJ, 498, 313
- [19] Grandi P., et al., 2003, ApJ, 593, 160
- [20] Grove J. E., Johnson W. N., Kroeger R. A., McNaron-Brown K., Skibo J. G., 1998, ApJ, 500, 899
- [21] Gu M., Cao X., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 349
- [22] Häring-Neumayer N., Cappellari M., Rix H.-W., Hartung M., Prieto M. A., Meisenheimer K., Lenzen R., 2006, ApJ, 643, 226
- [23] Heinz S., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 835
- [24] Heinz S., Sunyaev R. A., 2003, MNRAS, 343, L59
- [25] Ho L. C., 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475
- [26] Ichimaru S., 1977, ApJ, 214, 840
- [27] Krolik J. H., Hawley J. F., Hirose S., 2005, ApJ, 622, 1008
- [28] Kurpiewski A., Jaroszyński M., 1999, A&A, 346, 713
- [29] Kurpiewski A., Jaroszyński M., 2000, Acta Astronomica, 50, 79
- [30] Li Y. R., Yuan Y. F., Wang J. M., Wang J. C., Zhang S., 2009, ApJ, 699, 513
- [31] Machida M., Nakamura K., Matsumoto R., 2004, PASJ, 56, 671
- [32] Mahadevan R., Quataert E., 1997, ApJ, 490, 605
- [33] Manmoto T., 2000, ApJ, 534, 734 (M00)
- [34] Manmoto T., Mineshige S., Kusunose M., 1997, ApJ, 489, 791
- [35] Markowitz A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 229
- [36] McClintock J. E., Remillard R. A., 2006, in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, eds. W. Lewin, M. van der Klis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 157
- [37] Meisenheimer K., et al., 2007, A&A, 471, 453
- [38] Merloni A., Heinz S., di Matteo T., 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057
- [39] Miyakawa T., Yamaoka K., Homan J., Saito K., Dotani T., Yoshida A., Inoue H., 2008, PASJ, 60, 637
- [40] Nakamura K. E., Kusunose M., Matsumoto R., Kato S., 1997, PASJ, 49, 503
- [41] Narayan R., McClintock, J. E. 2008, New Astronomy Review, 51, 733
- [42] Narayan R., Barret D., McClintock J. E., 1997, ApJ, 482, 448
- [43] Narayan R., Kato S., Honma F., 1997, ApJ, 476, 49
- [44] Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, ApJ, 452, 710
- [45] Niedźwiecki A., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 913
- [46] Niedźwiecki A., Zdziarski A. A., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 606
- [47] Oda H., Machida M., Nakamura K. E., Matsumoto R., 2010, ApJ, 712, 639
- [48] Paczyński B., Wiita P. J., 1980, A&A, 88, 23
- [49] Page D. N., Thorne K. S., 1974, ApJ, 191, 499
- [50] Park M.-G., Ostriker J. P., 2001, ApJ, 549, 100
- [51] Piran T., Shaham J., 1977, ApJ, 214, 268
- [52] Popham R., Gammie C. F., 1998, ApJ, 504, 419
- [53] Quataert E., Gruzinov A., 1999, ApJ, 520, 248
- [54] Quataert E., Narayan R., 1999, ApJ, 520, 298
- [55] Rajesh S. R., Mukhopadhyay B., 2010, MNRAS, 402, 961
- [56] Rees M. J., Begelman M. C., Blandford R. D., Phinney E. S., 1982, Nature, 295, 17
- [57] Rothschild R. E., Markowitz A., Rivers E., Suchy S., Pottschmidt K., Kadler M., Müller C., Wilms J., 2011, ApJ, 733, 23
- [58] Russell D. M., Maitra D., Dunn R. J. H., Markoff S., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1759
- [59] Sharma P., Quataert E., Hammett G. W., Stone J. M., 2007, ApJ, 667, 714
- [60] Sobolewska M. A., Papadakis I. E., Done C., Malzac J., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 280
- [61] Steinle H. et al. 1998, A&A, 330, 97
- [62] Veledina A., Vurm I., Poutanen J., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3330
- [63] Wardziński G., Zdziarski A. A., Gierliński M., Grove J. E., Jahoda K., Johnson W. N., 2002, MNRAS, 337, 829
- [64] Whysong D., Antonucci R., 2004, ApJ, 602, 116
- [65] Wu Q., Gu M., 2008, ApJ, 682, 212
- [66] Wu Q., Yuan F., Cao X., 2007, ApJ, 669, 96
- [67] Xie F.-G., Niedźwiecki A., Zdziarski A. A., Yuan F., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 170 (X10)
- [68] Younes G., Porquet D., Sabra B., Reeves J. N., 2011, A&A, 530, 149
- [69] Yuan F., 2007, in The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, eds. L. C. Ho and J.-M. Wang, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 373, p. 95
- [70] Yuan F., Cui W., 2005, ApJ, 629, 408
- [71] Yuan F., Cui W., Narayan R., 2005, ApJ, 620, 905
- [72] Yuan F., Li M., 2011, ApJ, 737, 23
- [73] Yuan F., Quataert E., Narayan R., 2003, ApJ, 598, 301
- [74] Yuan F., Taam R. E., Misra R., Wu X.-B., Xue Y., 2007, ApJ, 658, 282
- [75] Yuan F., Xie F. G., Ostriker J. P., 2009, ApJ, 691, 98
- [76] Yuan F., Yu Z., Ho L. C., 2009, ApJ, 703, 1034
- [77] Yamaoka K., Miyakawa T. G., Saito K., Uzawa M., Arai M., Sakamoto H., Yamazaki T., Yoshida A., 2006, in Proc. VI Microquasar Workshop: Microquasars and Beyond. Proc. Sci., SISSA, Trieste, p. 102
- [78] Zdziarski A. A., Gierliński M., 2004, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 155, 99
- [79] Zdziarski A. A., Lubiński P., Smith D. A., 1999, MNRAS, 303, L11
- [80] Zdziarski A. A., Gierliński M., Mikołajewska J., Wardziński G., Smith D. M., Harmon B. A., Kitamoto S., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 791