Fully guided-wave photon pair source for quantum applications

Fully guided-wave photon pair source for quantum applications

Abstract

We report a fully guided-wave source of polarisation entangled photons based on a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide mounted in a Sagnac interferometer. We demonstrate the source’s quality by converting polarisation entanglement to postselection-free energy-time entanglement for which we obtain a near-optimal -parameter of , i.e. a violation of the Bell inequality by more than 35 standard deviations. The exclusive use of guided-wave components makes our source compact and stable which is a prerequisite for increasingly complex quantum applications. Additionally, our source offers a great versatility in terms of photon pair emission spectrum and generated quantum state, making it suitable for a broad range of quantum applications such as cryptography and metrology. In this sense, we show how to use our source for chromatic dispersion measurements in optical fibres which opens new avenues in the field of quantum metrology.

1 Introduction

Sources of photonic entanglement have led to remarkable advances in quantum information science [1]. In quantum key distribution, entangled photon pairs can be used for provably secure communication purposes [2, 3, 4, 5]. Linear optical quantum processors may solve some computational tasks in significantly more efficient ways compared to classical counterparts [6, 7]. Also, optical quantum metrology exploits correlations between two, or more, photons in order to perform phase-sensitive measurements with sub-shot-noise precision [8].

In all the above-mentioned fields, experimental complexity is increasing rapidly which sets high demands on stability, efficiency and compactness of the employed quantum photonic sources. In this framework, integrated and guided-wave approaches have demonstrated their huge potential since photons are tightly confined and well isolated from environmental influences [9, 10].

In principle, any photonic entanglement observable can be chosen for applications. For quantum key distribution, energy-time entanglement has proven to be advantageous thanks to its inherrent robustness against environmental influences. On the other hand, the polarisation observable is the most natural one, as its detection necessitates only standard optics such as wave-plates and polarising beam-splitters (PBS). Despite its sensitivity to environmentally-induced polarisation drifts, it has been shown that polarisation entanglement can even be distributed over long distances in fibre networks thanks to active polarisation stabilisation schemes [11, 12]. Ultimately, a photon pair source should offer the dynamical choice between either observable, in view of adapting the setup to the particular needs of the experiment.

Here, we demonstrate the realisation of such a flexible source. Our setup naturally generates paired photons entangled in energy-time and polarisation and we exploit advantageously the latter observable to reveal energy-time entanglement using a postselection-free method [13], as opposed to the standard method [14, 15]. The potential of our approach for applications is further underlined by performing quantum-enhanced chromatic dispersion measurements in metre sized optical fibres.

1.1 State of the art guided-wave polarisation entangled photon pair sources

There is a large variety of polarisation entanglement sources taking advantage of guided-wave photonics. Polarisation entangled photon pairs can be generated through four-wave mixing in silicon ring resonators [16] or birefringent fibres [17, 18, 19]. Here, the corresponding emission bandwidth is usually relatively narrow which compromises the source versatility. Additionally, in order to separate the pairs from the pump laser (and the related Raman scattering noise), several filtering stages are required which increases optical losses significantly, while the paired photons need to be at non-degenerate wavelengths [18, 19]. On the other hand, guided-wave polarisation entangled photon pair sources based on spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) offer noise-free and high-efficiency generation [20, 10]. Exploiting type-II SPDC in periodically poled waveguides, such as lithium niobate (PPLN/W) and potassium titanyl phosphate, allows to naturally generate polarisation entangled photon pairs, however with a relatively pair narrow emission bandwidth [21, 22]. Broader emission spectra offer increased wavelength flexibility, and, for example, the possibility to simultaneously provide many standard telecommunication wavelength channels with entangled photon pairs using only one source [5, 23, 24, 25]. This can be obtained through type-0 SPDC in PPLN/W, via which, however, only the energy-time entanglement observable is naturally available [26, 15]. Therefore, generation of polarisation entanglement further requires quantum state engineering, e.g. interferometric setups like a birefringent delay line [27, 28] or by having two type-0 generators in a Mach-Zehnder type configuration [29, 30]. In order to get rid of active interferometer stabilisation systems, several groups employed a PPLN/W in a Sagnac loop configuration [31, 32]. However, the related setups required some special free-space optics, compromising both stability and compactness. Fully guided-wave approaches were demonstrated using a configuration in which second-harmonic generation and SPDC occur in the same Sagnac loop [33, 34]. However, similarly to four-wave mixing approaches, only non-degenerate photon pairs can be produced and significant efforts for pump laser filtering are required.

In the following, we show the realisation of a photon pair source that overcomes the above-mentioned issues, i.e. a source of broadband polarisation entangled photon pairs, entirely based on guided-wave photonics. We note also that this source has been used within the framework of The Big Bell Test [35] and details on this particular experiment will be reported elsewhere. Additionally, we demonstrate how to exploit the versatile design of our approach for performing chromatic dispersion measurements in optical fibres.

2 Experimental setup

The schematics of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Experimental setup. Energy-time and polarisation entangled photon pairs are created in a fully-guided wave configuration based on a Sagnac loop. The photon pair generator is a 3.8 cm long PPLN/W. Standard single-mode fibres are symbolised by yellow lines while PMFs are represented by blue lines. The length of the right-hand side PMF can be adapted by inserting patch cords of different lengths. Paired photons are generated in the maximally entangled state . Signal and idler photons are deterministically separated at the C/L-band WDM and futher filtered down to a bandwidth of about 1 nm. Two electro-optic phase modulators (EOM) are used to induce phase-shifts between the and contributions. Photons are projected into the diagonal basis using PC, PBS, four single photon detectors, and a TDC. As a result, energy-time entanglement is analysed in a postselection-free fashion [13].

It is divided in two parts, i.e. a photon pair generation stage, and an entanglement analysis stage.

2.1 Entangled photon pair generation

An actively wavelength-stabilised fibre-coupled 780 nm continuous-wave pump laser is sent through a 780/1550 wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) to a fibre polarising beam-splitter (PBS, Photonik Singapore Ptd Ltd), defining the in- and output ports of the Sagnac loop. Although the PBS is optimised for the telecom wavelength band, its performance at 780 nm is reasonably good, i.e. the overall transmission is 50% and the polarisation extinction ratio is 30:1. At the output of the PBS, vertically polarised pump laser photons propagate in the clockwise direction , and horizontally polarised ones in the counter-clockwise direction in two telecom polarisation maintaining fibres (PMF). Note that, after the PBS, photons propagate along the slow PMF axis in both output fibres. The latter PMF is twisted by , therefore pump photons in this fibre are also vertically polarised . By connecting different fibre patch cords, we can choose the length difference between the two PMFs from zero to 32 m which will be of interest for chromatic dispersion measurements. However, if not explicitly stated, both PMFs have the same optical length within 1 cm and are connected directly to the photon pair generator, a 3.8 cm long PPLN/W. In this crystal, vertically polarised pump photons can be converted to vertically polarised photon pairs through type-0 SPDC, . Here, the subscripts s and i denote signal and idler photons, respectively.

By adjusting the polarisation of the pump laser photons, we can tune the probability of generating photon pairs in either direction. The generated pairs are collected by the PMFs and further sent to the PBS. Note that the polarisation of the pair contribution generated in the clockwise direction is rotated by in the twisted PMF, i.e. . After the PBS, photon pair contributions generated in clockwise and counter-clockwise directions are recombined into the same spatial mode, and separated from the pump laser at the WDM, resulting in the formation of the following state

(1)

Here, and denote the probability amplitudes which are directly related to the pump laser polarisation. The (constant) phase factor depends on the polarisation of the pump laser, the length of the PMFs, and, to a small extent, on environmental influences such as stress and temperature fluctuations in the PMFs. By adjusting the pump laser polarisation properly, we can set and , such that a maximally entangled Bell state is obtained:

(2)

The wavelength-degenerate photon pair emission spectrum of our PPLN/W after the WDM is shown in Figure 2. It covers about 40 nm and both the shape and the central wavelength can be further tuned over a large range using basic temperature control [28].

Figure 2: Emission spectrum of the photon pair generator at a temperature of C. The spectrum covers about 40 nm at the degenerate wavelength. Using a C/L-band WDM, the spectrum is cut into two bands (vertical dashed line) in order to provide Alice (Bob) with the long (short) wavelength band.

As the photon pair generation process needs to obey the conservation of the energy, signal and idler photons are generated pairwise symmetrically around the degenerate wavelength of 1560 nm. For this reason, we choose to split the paired photons deterministically by sending the long (signal) and short (idler) wavelength parts to Alice and Bob, respectively. Experimentally, this is implemented using a C/L-band WDM. Additionally, we employ 1 nm tunable bandpass filters centred at 1574 nm and 1546 nm, respectively. Note that our source is also capable of generating, in a non-deterministic fashion, degenerate entangled photon pairs which could be sent to Alice and Bob by replacing the WDM with a standard 50/50 beam-splitter, and adapting the bandpass filters accordingly.

2.2 Entanglement analysis setup

As the photon pairs are generated via continuous-wave SPDC, they are inherently energy-time correlated. Usually this type of quantum correlation is analysed using a pair of unbalanced interferometers, referred to as the Franson configuration, giving signal and idler photons a short and long path to the detector [36]. Due to the spontaneous character of the photon pair generation process, the pair creation time remains unknown, making the two contributions in which both photons take the same path indistinguishable (short-short and long-long). Consequently, quantum interference may be observed as a function of the phase relation between these two contributions. This type of entanglement analysis necessitates, however, a postselection procedure in order to exclude contributions in which the paired photons take opposite paths (short-long and long-short) [14], otherwise interference fringe visibilities are limited to 50% [37].

Here, we take advantage of a previously reported strategy, developed by Strekalov et al. towards analysing energy-time entanglement in a postselection-free fashion [13]. The basic idea is that the short-short and long-long contributions are replaced by and , respectively. As our particular photon pair source generates neither nor contributions, a postselection procedure therefore becomes unnecessary.

The phase relation between the two created contributions is tuned using fibre electro-optic phase modulators (EOM) with a half-wave voltage of about 2.5 V. Depending on the voltage applied to the EOMs, a phase shift is applied to the and contributions, however, and remain always unaltered. Therefore, we obtain

(3)

Here, and are the phase shifts applied to the signal and idler photon contribution, respectively.

In order to observe interference with the highest visibility, the contributions to the photon pair state need to be indistinguishable. In our case, this is done in two steps. First, the probability amplitudes of those contributions are equalised by optimising the pump laser polarisation, i.e. . Second, polarisation state information is erased by measuring the individual states (signal and idler) in the diagonal polarisation basis. This is done by rotating the polarisations of the corresponding states by using fibre polarisation controllers (PC), followed by quantum state projection on PBS and four single photon detectors (SPD, SPD, SPD, SPD). At Alice’s site, we use free-running low-noise InGaAs SPDs (IDQ 220, 15% detection efficiency, 20 s deadtime) which trigger, upon a detection event, Bob’s gated InGaAs SPDs (IDQ 201, 20% detection efficiency, 40 s deadtime). All detectors are connected to a time-to-digital converter (TDC) which allows to infer the two-photon coincidence rates between different pairs of detectors.

3 Results

3.1 Two-photon coincidence histograms

In our arrangement, we expect two-photon coincidences between four different detector combinations, i.e. SPD & SPD; SPD & SPD; SPD & SPD; and SPD & SPD.

Figure 3: Coincidence histograms for the four possible detector combinations, i.e. SPD & SPD (red); SPD & SPD (blue); SPD & SPD (green); and SPD & SPD (grey). The temporal bin width of our TDC is 81 ps. Note that, for better visualisation, the four peaks have been temporally displaced using different cable lengths. Throughout the rest of the manuscript, only events within four bins located around the center of each coincidence peak are considered.

Typical coincidence histograms, for random phase fluctuations applied to both EOMs, are shown in Figure 3. Four coincidence peaks are obtained, corresponding to the above-mentioned detector combinations. To maintain an acceptable signal-to-noise level, only events within a 324 ps region around the centre of each coincidence peak are considered.

3.2 Entanglement analysis

Entanglement analysis is performed by recording interference fringes while scanning Bob’s phase for two fixed values of Alice’s phase and , respectively. As shown in Figure 4(a-b), sinusoidal fringes are obtained for all the four two-photon coincidence configurations. As expected, pairs of detectors measuring identical polarisation modes (SPD & SPD and SPD & SPD), as well as pairs measuring opposite modes (SPD & SPD and SPD & SPD) are always in phase. The fact that in both cases, sinusoidal interference fringes are obtained, demonstrates the invariance of entanglement under rotations of the analysis basis. From fitting the data with sinusoidal curves we extract the following fringe visibilities: For Alice at , we obtain , , , and for the detector pairs SPD & SPD, SPD & SPD, SPD & SPD, and SPD & SPD, respectively. At , we obtain , , , and for the detector pairs SPD & SPD, SPD & SPD, SPD & SPD, and SPD & SPD, respectively.

When Bob’s phase settings are and , respectively, we can extract the necessary expectation values for the violation of the Bell inequalities via the -parameter [38, 39, 40]. For , nonlocal correlations associated with the created state are generally proven. The difference to the optimal value of can be used as a measure of the quality of the entangled state.

Figure 4: Phase scans for the violation of the Bell inquality through postselection-free energy-time entanglement. At Alice’s site, two fixed phase settings are used: (a) and (b): . Bob’s phase is continuously scanned. In both cases, sinusoidal interference fringes are obtained in the two-photon coincidence rates corresponding to the four possible detector combinations. This underlines that entanglement is invariant under analysis basis rotations. Error bars assume poissonian statistics.

From our raw data, we extract which represents a violation of the Bell inequalities by more than 25 standard deviations. Additionally, when subtracting noise originating only from the detectors’ dark counts (30 counts per 2 seconds), we obtain , which is only 3.5 standard deviations away from the optimal value of . This further underlines the quality of our source and showcases the results that could be achieved using state-of-the-art superconducting single photon detectors [41].

3.3 Performance evaluation

In order to characterise the performance of a photon pair source, two parameters are critical.

First, the achievable photon pair generation rate for the maximum reasonable pump power at which no material damage occurs and at which the experiment remains stable. Thanks to their high efficiency, standard 4 cm long type-0 PPLN/Ws pumped at a few 10 mW usually generate a stable flux of (independent on the filtered spectral bandwidth), which becomes particularily interesting for experiments requiring ultra narrowband photon pairs [42, 28]. For experiments based on discrete variables, higher photon pair generation rates are usually not considered as the experimental results become severely compromised by multipair emission contributions. Moreover, in our case with rather broadband photons, we are constrained by the detectors’ maximum counting rates way before multipair contributions become an issue, and therefore the waveguide-coupled pump power in our experiments never exceeds . Consequently, we conclude that the maximum achievable pair generation rate is generally not a concern for PPLN/W based photon pair sources. The performance of our particular PPLN/W compares a little bit unfavourable to state-of-the-art PPLN/Ws [28]. We measure a downconversion efficiency of within the 40 nm broad emission spectrum of the source. In other words, the internal spectral brightness of our source is generated photon pairs per second, per milliwatt of pump power and per GHz of photon pair spectral emission bandwidth. Therefore, are generated at a waveguide-coupled pump power of 116 mW. For our MgO doped PPLN/W, this power level is still reasonably low and can be coupled into the PPLN/W without compromising its performance and stability.

Another important criterion is photon pair propagation loss from the source to the fibres which arrive at the users. In our case we a measure single photon propagation loss of from the output of the PPLN/W to Alice’s and Bob’s analysers (i.e. in front of the EOMs), respectively. The main contribution comes from our rather lossy 1 nm bandpass filters () which could be reduced by more than 3 dB with state-of-the-art dense wavelength division multiplexers (DWDM). With such DWDMs, one could use our polarisation entangled pair source as a heralded single photon source with a heralding efficiency of . This would be amongst the highest ones reported for photon pair generators based on guided-wave photonics [43, 44, 45] and further underlines the versatility of our source.

3.4 Chromatic dispersion measurements

We now demonstrate how this setup can be further exploited for measuring chromatic dispersion in the PMFs used in the Sagnac loop. As signal and idler photons are non-degenerate, their wave-packets propagate at different group velocities in all the (fiber) setup. In the standard configuration of the experiment, the optical path lengths from the source to the detectors are identical for both contributions, i.e. and . Therefore, signal and idler photons arrive always with the same time delays at their respective detectors, no matter which of the two contributions is analysed.

If, however, the length of one fibre in the Sagnac loop is considerably increased, say e.g. the right hand side fibre in which the contribution propagates, then this contribution leads to an arrival time difference which is greater than the one related to . We now denote as the related additional time difference introduced between the photons in the contribution. Note that, in a previous study, the resulting broadening of the coincidence peaks has been used for evaluating chromatic dispersion in the employed fibres with a sensitivity related to the timing resolution of the single photon detectors  [46].

Here, we choose a different approach that achieves a resolution far below the detector timing jitter. For this, we exploit the fact that the visibility of the interference fringes shown in Figure 4 dramatically depends on the degree of indistinguishability between and contributions. Note that both contributions actually do not have to be distinguished by the detectors, the mere possibility to do so is sufficient to reduce the fringe visibility [47].

Before measuring chromatic dispersion, we characterise first how the interference fringe visibility decreases as a function of the additional delay . For this, we employ the exact same setup as used before for generating entangled photon pairs. However, as shown in Figure 5(a), in Alice’s path, a polarisation Michelson interferometer is introduced. This allows us, via a movable mirror, to introduce a controlled additional optical delay to the contribution. The obtained (noise-subtracted) interference fringe visibilities as a function of are shown in Figure 5(b). For our photons, filtered down to 1 nm spectral bandwidth, the fringe visibility drops down to 50% at a delay of about 4 ps which gives a temporal resolution comparable to state-of-the-art telecom measurement equipment [48]. However, we mention that the resolution of our setup could be improved by 20 times, simply by removing the bandpass filters and therefore exploiting the full emission spectrum of the pair source. Note that the data in Figure 5(b) can neither be fitted by a Gaussian nor by a sinc-squared function. This indicates that our flat-top bandpass filters have rather smooth rising and falling edges and/or that the spectral phase of the photons is not flat within the transmitted spectrum. Nevertheless, we have now obtained a precise ruler which allows us to map measured visibilities to temporal delays.

Figure 5: (a) Experimental setup for referencing our experimental setup in the perspective of measuring chromatic dispersion via temporal delays. Compared to the setup in Figure 1, we introduce a polarisation Michelson interferometer at Alice’s analyser. This allows us, via a movable mirror, to introduce a controlled delay for the contribution through which a source of distinguishability is introduced. (b) Observed net interference fringe visibilities as a function of the delay time .

We proceed now to measuring chromatic dispersion in the PMFs in the Sagnac loop. For this, set the delay in the polarisation Michelson interferometer to zero, and introduce additional PMF patch cords with length ranging from zero to 32 m into the right-hand side of the loop. We emphasise that the additional PMF delay does not have an influence on the delays of the pump laser photons as those have a coherence length of a few 100 metres. In other words, and contributions are generated from the same pump photon up to PMF lengths of 100 m. Experimental results are shown in Figure 6. The red dots correspond to the data measured for different PMF length and the light blue line corresponds to the previously measured single photon temporal shape. The value of chromatic dispersion in the PMF can now be extracted by inferring the scaling parameter that maps a given additional PMF length to a temporal delay :

(4)

By the method of the least-error-squares, we obtain (the error corresponds to one standard deviation, i.e. the offset at which the error square doubles compared to its minimal value). The chromatic dispersion coefficient is then obtained by normalising with respect to the wavelength difference between signal and idler photons :

(5)

The prefactor of is introduced in order to comply with telecom standards where fibre lengths are usually measured in kilometres instead of metres. In our case, the paired photons are separated by , and therefore we obtain which is in very good agreement with previous measurements [49].

Figure 6: Chromatic dispersion measurements via PMF length dependent interference fringe visibilities. Red dots represent measured visibilities as a function of the PMF length (bottom axis), and the light blue line represents the shape of the previously measured single photon temporal shape (top axis). The scaling factor between the top and bottom axes is , at which the sum of the error squares between both measurements is minimised. By normalising with respect to the wavelength separation of the paired photons, we extract the chromatic dispersion coefficient . The two insets show the recorded fringes obtained at and .

We mention that this method of measuring chromatic dispersion offers a great versatility in the sense that the sensitivity can be quickly adapted to the length and chromatic dispersion of the fibre under test. Two procedures can be followed, which are generally very easy to implement. On the one hand, higher (lower) sensitivity can be obtained by increasing (decreasing) the wavelength-separation of the paired photons, . On the other hand, higher (lower) sensitivity could be achieved by reducing (increasing) using bandwidth-tunable filters.

Increased sensitivity would be required for measuring chromatic dispersion in short specialty fibres or fibres with nearly zero dispersion. On the other hand, reduced sensitivity allows measurements in rather long and/or highly dispersive fibres without the necessity to cut the fibre into shorter pieces.

Ultimately, by acquiring measurements at different , higher-order dispersive terms could also be inferred through the observation of a nonlinear dependence of as a function of . For example, in a 0.3 m long (nonlinear) optical fibre with ten times higher third order dispersion compared to a standard telecom single mode fibre at 1560 nm, the observed fringe visibility at would be 40% instead of 42% in a fibre with zero third order dispersion. Although such a small change in visibility cannot be observed with our current setup, this would be certainly feasible by employing high-speed superconducting single photon detectors and/or increasing integration times.

4 Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated a versatile fully guided-wave polarisation entangled photon-pair source based on a type-0 nonlinear waveguide mounted in a Sagnac loop. A high degree of entanglement was observed, underlined by an -parameter of , violating the Bell inequalities by more than 35 standard deviations. The exclusive use of guided-wave optics, combined to the Sagnac-loop configuration, gives our source an excellent stability. Additionally, loss figures of merit are low and we have proposed a strategy for further optimization. Although, here only energy-time entanglement has been revealed in a postselection-free fashion, we note that our source actually generates photon pairs which are hyperentangled in the polarisation and energy-time observables [16, 50]. This makes our scheme interesting for high-dimensional quantum key distribution schemes, potentially combined with dense wavelength division multiplexing strategies towards realising high bit rate systems [5, 23, 24, 25].

Furthermore, we have used our experimental setup for assessing chromatic dispersion in metre sized optical fibres via interference fringe visibility measurements. In this perspective, our approach is very simple and flexible in the sense that measurement sensitivity can be easily adapted to the fibre under test. Moreover, higher order dispersion terms can be easily accessed through measurements at different wavelength separations. Combining this method with other interferometric quantum-enhanced chromatic dispersion measurement methods promises a great potential for high-precision fibre optical characterisations [51].

Finally, thanks to the exclusive use of guided-wave photonics, it should be possible to implement the full experimental setup into a standard 19-inch rack. In this case, our rather bulky pump laser system could be replaced by a compact laser diode, similarly as it has been done in a previous study [52].

We therefore believe that our source is a good candidate for a broad range of applications in quantum information science.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Foundation Simone & Cino Del Duca, the European Commission for the FP7-ITN PICQUE project (grant agreement No 608062), l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) for the CONNEQT, SPOCQ and SITQOM projects (grants ANR-EMMA-002-01, ANR-14-CE32-0019, and ANR-15-CE24-0005, respectively), and the iXCore Research Foundation.

References

References

  1. W. Tittel and G. Weihs, “Photonic entanglement for fundamental tests and quantum communication,” Quant. Inf. Comput., vol. 1, p. 2, 2001.
  2. A. K. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 67, pp. 661–663, 1991.
  3. T. Jennewein, C. Simon, G. Weihs, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum cryptography with entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, pp. 4729–4732, 2000.
  4. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 74, pp. 145–195, 2002.
  5. D. Aktas, B. Fedrici, F. Kaiser, T. Lunghi, L. LabontÈ, and S. Tanzilli, “Entanglement distribution over 150 km in wavelength division multiplexed channels for quantum cryptography,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 10, pp. 451–457, 2016.
  6. A. Steane, “Quantum computing,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 61, p. 117, 1998.
  7. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature, vol. 409, pp. 46–52, 2000.
  8. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Advances in quantum metrology,” Nature Photon, vol. 5, pp. 222–229, 2011.
  9. S. Tanzilli, A. Martin, F. Kaiser, M. P. De Micheli, O. Alibart, and D. B. Ostrowsky, “On the genesis and evolution of integrated quantum optics,” Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 6, pp. 115–143, 2012.
  10. O. Alibart, V. D’Auria, M. De Micheli, F. Doutre, F. Kaiser, L. Labonté, T. Lunghi, E. Picholle, and S. Tanzilli, “Quantum photonics at telecom wavelengths based on lithium niobate waveguides,” J. Opt., vol. 18, p. 104001, 2016.
  11. J. Chen, G. Wu, Y. Li, E. Wu, and H. Zeng, “Active polarization stabilization in optical fibers suitable for quantum key distribution,” Opt. Express, vol. 15, pp. 17928–17936, 2007.
  12. G. B. Xavier, G. Vilela de Faria, G. P. Temporão, and J. P. von der Weid, “Full polarization control for fiber optical quantum communication systems using polarization encoding,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, pp. 1867–1873, 2008.
  13. D. V. Strekalov, T. B. Pittman, A. V. Sergienko, Y. H. Shih, and P. G. Kwiat, “Postselection-free energy-time entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 54, pp. R1–R4, 1996.
  14. J. Brendel, E. Mohler, and W. Martienssen, “Experimental test of Bell’s inequality for energy and time,” EPL, vol. 20, p. 575, 1992.
  15. S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, H. De Riedmatten, H. Zbinden, P. Baldi, M. De Micheli, D. B. Ostrowsky, and N. Gisin, “PPLN waveguide for quantum communication,” Eur. Phys. J. D, vol. 18, pp. 155–160, 2002.
  16. J. Suo, S. Dong, W. Zhang, Y. Huang, and J. Peng, “Generation of hyper-entanglement on polarization and energy-time based on a silicon micro-ring cavity,” Opt. Express, vol. 23, pp. 3985–3995, 2015.
  17. X. Li, P. L. Voss, J. E. Sharping, and P. Kumar, “Optical-fiber source of polarization-entangled photons in the 1550 nm telecom band,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 94, p. 053601, 2005.
  18. J. Fulconis, O. Alibart, J. L. O’Brien, W. J. Wadsworth, and J. G. Rarity, “Nonclassical interference and entanglement generation using a photonic crystal fiber pair photon source,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 99, p. 120501, 2007.
  19. E. Meyer-Scott, V. Roy, J.-P. Bourgoin, B. L. Higgins, L. K. Shalm, and T. Jennewein, “Generating polarization-entangled photon pairs using cross-spliced birefringent fibers,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, pp. 6205–6212, 2013.
  20. T. Suhara, “Generation of quantum-entangled twin photons by waveguide nonlinear-optic devices,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 3, pp. 370–393, 2009.
  21. T. Suhara, H. Okabe, and M. Fujimura, “Generation of polarization-entangled photons by type-II quasi-phase-matched waveguide nonlinear-optic device,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1093–1095, 2007.
  22. A. Martin, A. Issautier, H. Herrmann, W. Sohler, D. B. Ostrowsky, O. Alibart, and S. Tanzilli, “A polarization entangled photon-pair source based on a type-II PPLN waveguide emitting at a telecom wavelength,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, p. 103005, 2010.
  23. H. C. Lim, A. Yoshizawa, H. Tsuchida, and K. Kikuchi, “Broadband source of telecom-band polarization-entangled photon-pairs for wavelength-multiplexed entanglement distribution,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, pp. 16052–16057, 2008.
  24. C. Autebert, J. Trapateau, A. Orieux, A. LemaÓtre, C. Gomez-Carbonell, E. Diamanti, I. Zaquine, and S. Ducci, “Multi-user quantum key distribution with entangled photons from an AlGaAs chip,” Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 1, p. 01LT02, 2016.
  25. S. Arahira, H. Murai, and H. Sasaki, “Generation of highly stable WDM time-bin entanglement by cascaded sum-frequency generation and spontaneous parametric downconversion in a PPLN waveguide device,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, pp. 19581–19591, 2016.
  26. K. Sanaka, K. Kawahara, and T. Kuga, “New high-efficiency source of photon pairs for engineering quantum entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 86, pp. 5620–5623, 2001.
  27. H. Takesue, K. Inoue, O. Tadanaga, Y. Nishida, and M. Asobe, “Generation of pulsed polarization-entangled photon pairs in a 1.55-µm band with a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide and an orthogonal polarization delay circuit,” Opt. Lett., vol. 30, pp. 293–295, 2005.
  28. F. Kaiser, L. A. Ngah, A. Issautier, T. Delord, D. Aktas, V. D’Auria, M. P. D. Micheli, A. Kastberg, L. Labonté, O. Alibart, A. Martin, and S. Tanzilli, “Polarization entangled photon-pair source based on quantum nonlinear photonics and interferometry,” Opt. Commun., vol. 327, pp. 7–16, 2014. Special Issue on Nonlinear Quantum Photonics.
  29. A. Yoshizawa and H. Tsuchida, “Generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs in 1550nm band by a fiber-optic two-photon interferometer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, pp. 2457–2459, 2004.
  30. I. Herbauts, B. Blauensteiner, A. Poppe, T. Jennewein, and H. Hübel, “Demonstration of active routing of entanglement in a multi-user network,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, pp. 29013–29024, 2013.
  31. S. Odate, A. Yoshizawa, and H. Tsuchida, “Polarisation-entangled photon-pair source at 1550nm using 1 mm-long PPLN waveguide in fibre-loop configuration,” Electronics Letters, vol. 43, pp. 1376–1377, 2007.
  32. H. C. Lim, A. Yoshizawa, H. Tsuchida, and K. Kikuchi, “Wavelength-multiplexed entanglement distribution,” Optical Fiber Technology, vol. 16, pp. 225 – 235, 2010.
  33. Y.-K. Jiang and A. Tomita, “The generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs using periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides in a fibre loop,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 40, p. 437, 2007.
  34. S. Arahira, N. Namekata, T. Kishimoto, H. Yaegashi, and S. Inoue, “Generation of polarization entangled photon pairs at telecommunication wavelength using cascaded (2) processes in a periodically poled LiNbO3 ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, pp. 16032–16043, 2011.
  35. http://thebigbelltest.org. Webpage of The Big Bell Test.
  36. J. D. Franson, “Bell inequality for position and time,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 62, pp. 2205–2208, 1989.
  37. Z. Y. Ou, X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, “Observation of nonlocal interference in separated photon channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 65, pp. 321–324, 1990.
  38. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,” Physics, vol. 1, pp. 195–200, 1964.
  39. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 23, pp. 880–884, 1969.
  40. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 10th ed., 2011.
  41. R. H. Hadfield, “Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,” Nat Photon, vol. 3, pp. 696–705, 2009. and references therein.
  42. M. Halder, A. Beveratos, R. T. Thew, C. Jorel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, “High coherence photon pair source for quantum communication,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 10, p. 023027, 2008.
  43. A. McMillan, J. Fulconis, M. Halder, C. Xiong, J. Rarity, and W. Wadsworth, “Narrowband high-fidelity all-fibre source of heralded single photons at 1570 nm,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, pp. 6156–6165, 2009.
  44. S. Krapick, H. Herrmann, V. Quiring, B. Brecht, H. Suche, and C. Silberhorn, “An efficient integrated two-color source for heralded single photons,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, p. 033010, 2013.
  45. L. A. Ngah, O. Alibart, L. Labonté, V. D’Auria, and S. Tanzilli, “Ultra-fast heralded single photon source based on telecom technology,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 9, pp. L1–L5, 2015.
  46. J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, “Measurement of chromatic dispersion in optical fibers using pairs of correlated photons,” Optics Communications, vol. 151, no. 1-3, pp. 35–39, 1998.
  47. C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 59, pp. 2044–2046, 1987.
  48. L. ThÈvenaz, J.-P. Pellaux, N. Gisin, V. der Weid, and J. Pierre, “Review of chromatic dispersion measurements techniques,” in EFOC/LAN’89 Technical Digest, pp. 217–220, IGI-Europe, 1989.
  49. K. Okamoto and T. Hosaka, “Polarization-dependent chromatic dispersion in birefringent optical fibers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 290–292, 1987.
  50. P. G. Kwiat, “Hyper-entangled states,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 44, pp. 2173–2184, 1997.
  51. F. Kaiser, P. Vergyris, D. Aktas, C. Babin, L. Labonté, and S. Tanzilli, “Spectrally-resolved quantum interferometry for absolute and high-precision determination of optical properties,” e-print arXiv, p. 1701.01621, 2017.
  52. T. E. Stuart, J. A. Slater, F. Bussières, and W. Tittel, “Flexible source of nondegenerate entangled photons based on a two-crystal sagnac interferometer,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 88, p. 012301, 2013.
104938
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
Edit
-  
Unpublish
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel
Comments 0
Request comment
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description