First 3C454.3 giant flare

Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Observations of Recent Gamma-ray Outbursts from 3C 454.3

M. Ackermann11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , M. Ajello11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , L. Baldini22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , J. Ballet33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France , G. Barbiellini44affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, I-34127 Trieste, Italy 55affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, I-34127 Trieste, Italy , D. Bastieri66affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy 77affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy , K. Bechtol11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , R. Bellazzini22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , B. Berenji11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , R. D. Blandford11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , E. Bonamente88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , A. W. Borgland11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , J. Bregeon22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , M. Brigida1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , P. Bruel1212affiliation: Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, École polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France , R. Buehler11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , T. H. Burnett1313affiliation: Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1560, USA , S. Buson66affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy 77affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy , G. A. Caliandro1414affiliation: Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai (IEEC-CSIC), Campus UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain , R. A. Cameron11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , P. A. Caraveo1515affiliation: INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, I-20133 Milano, Italy , S. Carrigan77affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy , J. M. Casandjian33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France , E. Cavazzuti1616affiliation: Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) Science Data Center, I-00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy , C. Cecchi88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , Ö. Çelik1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 1818affiliation: Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and Technology (CRESST) and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 1919affiliation: Department of Physics and Center for Space Sciences and Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA , A. Chekhtman2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA 2121affiliation: George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA , C. C. Cheung2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA 2222affiliation: National Research Council Research Associate, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 20001, USA , J. Chiang11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , S. Ciprini99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , R. Claus11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , J. Cohen-Tanugi2323affiliation: Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France , S. Corbel33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France 2424affiliation: Institut universitaire de France, 75005 Paris, France , S. Cutini1616affiliation: Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) Science Data Center, I-00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy , F. D’Ammando2525affiliation: IASF Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy 2626affiliation: INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, I-00133 Roma, Italy , C. D. Dermer2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA affiliationmark: , A. de Angelis2727affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Udine and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Gruppo Collegato di Udine, I-33100 Udine, Italy , F. de Palma1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , E. do Couto e Silva11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , P. S. Drell11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , R. Dubois11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , D. Dumora2828affiliation: Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS/IN2p3, Centre d’Études Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, 33175 Gradignan, France , L. Escande2828affiliation: Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS/IN2p3, Centre d’Études Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, 33175 Gradignan, France affiliationmark: , C. Favuzzi1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , S. J. Fegan1212affiliation: Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, École polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France , E. C. Ferrara1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA , L. Fuhrmann2929affiliation: Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany , Y. Fukazawa3030affiliation: Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan , P. Fusco1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , F. Gargano1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , D. Gasparrini1616affiliation: Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) Science Data Center, I-00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy , N. Gehrels1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA , S. Germani88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , B. Giebels1212affiliation: Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, École polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France , N. Giglietto1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , P. Giommi1616affiliation: Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) Science Data Center, I-00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy , F. Giordano1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , M. Giroletti3131affiliation: INAF Istituto di Radioastronomia, 40129 Bologna, Italy , T. Glanzman11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , G. Godfrey11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , I. A. Grenier33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France , J. E. Grove2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA , S. Guiriec3232affiliation: Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research (CSPAR), University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA , D. Hadasch1414affiliation: Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai (IEEC-CSIC), Campus UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain , M. Hayashida11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , E. Hays1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA , G. Jóhannesson11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , A. S. Johnson11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , W. N. Johnson2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA , T. Kamae11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , H. Katagiri3030affiliation: Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan , J. Kataoka3333affiliation: Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1, Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 169-8555 Japan , J. Knödlseder3434affiliation: Centre d’Étude Spatiale des Rayonnements, CNRS/UPS, BP 44346, F-30128 Toulouse Cedex 4, France , M. Kuss22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , J. Lande11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , S. Larsson3535affiliation: Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3636affiliation: The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3737affiliation: Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden , L. Latronico22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , S.-H. Lee11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , M. Llena Garde3535affiliation: Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3636affiliation: The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden , F. Longo44affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, I-34127 Trieste, Italy 55affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, I-34127 Trieste, Italy , F. Loparco1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , B. Lott2828affiliation: Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS/IN2p3, Centre d’Études Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, 33175 Gradignan, France affiliationmark: , P. Lubrano88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , G. M. Madejski11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , A. Makeev2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA 2121affiliation: George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA , N. Marchili2929affiliation: Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany , M. N. Mazziotta1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , J. E. McEnery1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3838affiliation: Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA , J. Mehault2323affiliation: Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France , P. F. Michelson11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , T. Mizuno3030affiliation: Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan , C. Monte1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , M. E. Monzani11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , A. Morselli3939affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Roma, Italy , I. V. Moskalenko11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , S. Murgia11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , T. Nakamori3333affiliation: Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1, Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 169-8555 Japan , K. Nalawajko4040affiliation: Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland , M. Naumann-Godo33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France , P. L. Nolan11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , J. P. Norris4141affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA , E. Nuss2323affiliation: Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France , T. Ohsugi4242affiliation: Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan , A. Okumura4343affiliation: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan , N. Omodei11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , E. Orlando4444affiliation: Max-Planck Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, 85748 Garching, Germany , J. F. Ormes4141affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA , V. Pelassa2323affiliation: Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France , M. Pepe88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , M. Pesce-Rollins22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , F. Piron2323affiliation: Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France , T. A. Porter11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , S. Rainò1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , R. Rando66affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy 77affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy , M. Razzano22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , A. Reimer4545affiliation: Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik and Institut für Theoretische Physik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , O. Reimer4545affiliation: Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik and Institut für Theoretische Physik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , L. C. Reyes4646affiliation: Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA , J. Ripken3535affiliation: Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3636affiliation: The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden , S. Ritz4747affiliation: Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA , M. Roth1313affiliation: Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1560, USA , H. F.-W. Sadrozinski4747affiliation: Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA , D. Sanchez1212affiliation: Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, École polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France , A. Sander4848affiliation: Department of Physics, Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA , J. D. Scargle4949affiliation: Space Sciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA , C. Sgrò22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , M. Sikora4040affiliation: Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland , E. J. Siskind5050affiliation: NYCB Real-Time Computing Inc., Lattingtown, NY 11560-1025, USA , G. Spandre22affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy , P. Spinelli1010affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “M. Merlin” dell’Università e del Politecnico di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy 1111affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy , M. S. Strickman2020affiliation: Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA , D. J. Suson5151affiliation: Department of Chemistry and Physics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN 46323-2094, USA , H. Takahashi4242affiliation: Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan , T. Takahashi4343affiliation: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan , T. Tanaka11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , Y. Tanaka4343affiliation: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan affiliationmark: , J. B. Thayer11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , J. G. Thayer11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , D. J. Thompson1717affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA , L. Tibaldo66affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy 77affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy 33affiliation: Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France 5252affiliation: Partially supported by the International Doctorate on Astroparticle Physics (IDAPP) program , D. F. Torres1414affiliation: Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai (IEEC-CSIC), Campus UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain 5353affiliation: Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain , G. Tosti88affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy 99affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, I-06123 Perugia, Italy , A. Tramacere11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5454affiliation: Consorzio Interuniversitario per la Fisica Spaziale (CIFS), I-10133 Torino, Italy 5555affiliation: INTEGRAL Science Data Centre, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland , T. L. Usher11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , J. Vandenbroucke11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , N. Vilchez3434affiliation: Centre d’Étude Spatiale des Rayonnements, CNRS/UPS, BP 44346, F-30128 Toulouse Cedex 4, France , V. Vitale3939affiliation: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Roma, Italy 5656affiliation: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Roma, Italy , A. P. Waite11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , P. Wang11affiliation: W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA , B. L. Winer4848affiliation: Department of Physics, Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA , Z. Yang3535affiliation: Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 3636affiliation: The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden , T. Ylinen5757affiliation: Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 5858affiliation: School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden 3636affiliation: The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden , M. Ziegler4747affiliation: Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Abstract

The flat spectrum radio quasar 3C 454.3 underwent an extraordinary outburst in December 2009 when it became the brightest -ray source in the sky for over one week. Its daily flux measured with the Fermi Large Area Telescope at photon energies MeV reached ph cm s, representing the highest daily flux of any blazar ever recorded in high-energy -rays. It again became the brightest source in the sky in 2010 April, triggering a pointed-mode observation by Fermi. The correlated -ray temporal and spectral properties during these exceptional events are presented and discussed. The main results show flux variability over time scales less than 3 h and very mild spectral variability with an indication of gradual hardening preceding major flares. No consistent loop pattern emerged in the -ray spectral index vs flux plane. A minimum Doppler factor of is derived, and the maximum energy of a photon from 3C 454.3 is 20 GeV. The spectral break at a few GeV is inconsistent with Klein-Nishina softening from power-law electrons scattering Ly line radiation, and a break in the underlying electron spectrum in blazar leptonic models is implied.

Galaxies: active — quasars: individual: 3C 454.3 — gamma rays: observations

pt $\bigstar$$\bigstar$affiliationtext: Corresponding author: charles.dermer@nrl.navy.mil $\clubsuit$$\clubsuit$affiliationtext: Corresponding author: escande@cenbg.in2p3.fr $\spadesuit$$\spadesuit$affiliationtext: Corresponding author: lott@cenbg.in2p3.fr $\bullet$$\bullet$affiliationtext: Corresponding author: tanaka@astro.isas.jaxa.jp

1 Introduction

The radio source 3C 454.3 is a well-known flat spectrum radio quasar (FSRQ) at redshift . It entered a bright phase starting in 2000, and has shown remarkable activity in the past decade. It underwent major outbursts in 2005, reaching an R-band magnitude of and the largest apparent optical luminosity ever recorded from a blazar (Fuhrmann et al., 2006; Villata et al., 2006; Giommi et al., 2006). It also underwent major outbursts in 2007 (Ghisellini et al., 2007; Vercellone et al., 2009a) and 2008 (Vercellone et al., 2010; Jorstad et al., 2010).

First observations of 3C 454.3 with the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) began in July 2008 during Fermi’s commissioning period, when the source was found at a high flux state with   ph  cm s (Abdo et al., 2009). During this time, most observations were carried out in pointed mode with 3C 454.3 being close to the edge of the field of view ( off-axis), which did not allow for detailed spectral analysis during the brightest stage of the outburst. Observations in the decay stage, performed in survey mode, revealed a timescale less than 2 days for the flux to decline by a factor of 2. The spectrum showed a spectral break around 2 GeV with a spectral steepening from to . Such a break has now been found to be a common feature in bright FSRQs and in some low-synchrotron peaked BL Lacs as well (Abdo et al., 2010d). Based on weekly light curves, a very moderate “harder when brighter” effect has also been observed, with the photon spectral index obtained with a single power-law fit varying by less than 0.3 for flux ratios varying by 7 (Abdo et al., 2010d). The source is listed as 1FGL J2253.9+1608 in the First LAT AGN catalog (Abdo et al., 2010b).

The continuous monitoring by the Fermi LAT showed that the source activity faded continuously in early 2009 and then rose back up from June onwards. It underwent an exceptional outburst in November 2009 - January 2010 when it became the brightest -ray source in the sky for over a week, reaching a record daily flux level in the GeV band as seen by the LAT and AGILE (Striani et al., 2009a, b; Escande & Tanaka, 2009; Striani et al., 2010). At the same time it also showed strong activity at optical frequencies (Villata et al., 2009; Bonning et al., 2009; Sasada et al., 2009), in the Swift/XRT and BAT bands (Sakamoto et al., 2009; Krimm et al., 2009), and in the INTEGRAL/IBIS band (Vercellone et al., 2009b). Tavecchio et al. (2010) claimed -ray variability on timescales of a few hours from the LAT data and discussed its implications on the size and distance to the black hole of the emitting region, while Bonnoli et al. (2010) studied the single-day broad-band SEDs in the flare and in a lower state and found that a single-zone external Compton plus synchrotron self-Compton model adequately fitted the data. However, with a similar analysis, Pacciani et al. (2010) came to the conclusion that an additional component was required to fit the data. The source remained active afterwards with a slowly decaying flux around 210 ph cm s until early April 2010, when it brightened up again to a flux level of 10 ph cm s, prompting the first Fermi-LAT target-of-opportunity (ToO) pointed observation beginning on 2010 April 5 lasting for 200 ks.

These two major events offer a unique opportunity to probe intraday variability and the associated spectral changes in the -ray band, which is the focus of this paper. Particular attention is paid to the correlated spectral/flux variations on different time scales, both in terms of spectral hardness and position of the spectral break, which have not been investigated in detail before. In Section 2, observations and analysis of data from 3C 454.3 from August 2009 through April 2010 is presented. Section 3 gives results of the analysis, and Section 4 provides interpretation. We summarize in Section 5. A flat CDM cosmology with H = 71 km s Mpc, = 0.27, =0.73 is used in this paper, implying a luminosity distance cm to 3C 454.3.

2 Observations and analysis

The Fermi-LAT is a pair-conversion -ray telescope sensitive to photon energies greater than 20 MeV. In its nominal scanning mode, it surveys the whole sky every 3 hours with a field of view of about 2.4 sr (Atwood et al., 2009). The data presented in this paper (restricted to the 100 MeV-200 GeV range) were collected from 2009 August 27 to 2010 April 21 in survey mode, except for a 200 ks period starting on April 5 at 19:38 UT when the pointed mode was used, resulting in a gain of rate of accumulation of exposure by about a factor of 3.5 over survey mode. During pointed mode, the source direction was offset by with respect to the LAT axis in order to limit adverse effects related to gaps in the detector that can affect on-axis photons. Over 3000 photons with MeV were collected in pointed mode. To minimize systematics, only photons with energies greater than 100 MeV were considered in this analysis. In order to avoid contamination from Earth limb gamma-rays, a selection on events with zenith angle was applied. This analysis was performed with the standard analysis tool gtlike, part of the Fermi-LAT ScienceTools software package (version v9r15p5). The P6_V3_DIFFUSE set of instrument response functions was used. This set includes a correction for the average reduction of the effective area due to pile-up effects as fewer photon events pass the rejection cuts. This correction is sufficient for integration times longer than a day. The residual energy and trigger-rate dependent acceptance variations present for shorter times as established with Vela and Galactic diffuse emission data (typically amounting to less than to 10% in the considered periods), have not been corrected for in this analysis.

Photons were selected in a circular region of interest (ROI) 10 in radius, centered at the position of 3C 454.3. The isotropic background, including the sum of residual instrumental background and extragalactic diffuse -ray background, was modeled by fitting this component at high galactic latitude (file provided with ScienceTools). The Galactic diffuse emission model version “gll_iem_v02.fit,” was used, with both flux and photon spectral index left free in the fit (the Galactic longitude and latitude of 3C 454.3 is and , respectively). All point sources lying within the ROI and a surrounding 5-wide annulus with a flux greater than about 1% of the quiescent level of 3C 454.3 were modeled in the fit with single power-law distributions.

Although the actual spectral shape is better reproduced by a broken power law, the spectral variations were investigated using the photon indices resulting from single power-law (PL) fits, which provided the best statistical accuracy. All light curves were produced using fluxes derived with power-law fits.

Different analyses were performed by fitting the spectra with various models over the whole energy range covered by the LAT at MeV: a broken power law , with if and if , a log parabola function
( where is fixed at 1 GeV) and a power law with exponential cutoff function (), and with a PL model over equally spaced logarithmic energy bins with the spectral index kept constant and equal to the value fitted over the whole range.

In case of fits with broken power law (BPL) models, the break energy (E), which separates the photon energy ranges where different photon indices (for ) and (for ) apply, could not be obtained directly from the fit because of convergence problems due to the non-smooth character of the BPL function at the break energy. It was instead computed from a log-likelihood profile fitting procedure, with a statistical uncertainty corresponding to a difference of =1 in the log-likelihood function with respect to its minimum.

In order to minimize spurious correlations between flux and spectral index, the fluxes were also computed above the photon energy where the correlation between integrated flux and index is minimal. This energy was derived from a power-law fit of the form
(with =100 MeV). Since , minimizing with respect to yields ), where and are terms of the covariance matrix returned by the fit. In the 3C 454.3 case, has been found to be 163 MeV over the ToO time range. The same value has been used for the other time periods as well.

The estimated systematic uncertainty on the flux is 10% at 100 MeV, 5% at 500 MeV and 20% at 10 GeV. The energy resolution is better than 10% over the range of measured E.

3 Results

Figure 1 displays the daily light curves (red points) from MJD 55070 to 55307 (2009 August 27 to 2010 April 21) for fluxes above 100 MeV. The periods showing the fastest flux variations during the December flare, with fluxes changing by more than a factor of 2 in amplitude, are enlarged in the insets, with the MeV fluxes averaged over a daily, 6-hour, and 3-hour binning shown by the red, open blue and green data points, respectively. The error bars are statistical only. Three flares displaying a flux variation greater than a factor of 2 over less than a day (MJD 55167, 55170 and 55195) have been studied extensively during this period. These flares exhibit very different profiles and degrees of symmetry. The first two flares were fitted with the function (Abdo et al., 2010a)

(1)

where and are the rising and falling times, is the flare flux amplitude and is a (slowly varying) background flux, while for the third one a constant plateau flux was allowed between the rising and falling phases. The characteristic flare duration can be estimated as +. We obtained =0.37 d and =0.06 d for the MJD 55167 (Dec. 2) flare, and =0.07 d, =0.26 d for the MJD 55170 (Dec. 5) flare. The MJD 55195 flare, which is less prominent, shows a rise time of d. In the two early flares, the flux variation was greater than 10 ph MeV) cm s, and statistically significant factor-of-2 variations take place on timescales as short as 3 hours.

In Figure 1, the light curve of the July-August 2008 outburst (shifted by 511 days; see Abdo et al., 2009) is shown for comparison. The resemblance of the two light curves is notable , although the estimated fluences are different by 40%. The brightest periods of the outbursts last for about 10 days, and are then followed by a long tail of fairly high activity upon which are superimposed minor flares lasting for a few days. Although the outburst in April 2010 is longer, lasting for 30 days, it exhibits similar patterns as the December 2009 outburst, where its maximum level is preceded by an intermediate elevated flux lasting for about 5 days. This feature could serve as an alert for an imminent surge in flux.

The power density spectrum (PDS) of the 2009 Nov. 5 - 2010 March 4 3h-light curve has been calculated in a similar way as that reported in Abdo et al. (2010a) for the 11-month light curve (3-day bin), normalized to fractional variance per frequency unit () and white-noise subtracted. This PDS indicates a power law power density, with index , i.e., intermediate between flickering (red noise) and shot noise (driven by Brownian processes). Such result confirms over a wider frequency range the value found with the first 11 months of data. In Figure 2 the first order structure function (SF), the PDS and the Morlet continuous wavelet transform (CWT) of the continuous, unprecedented-resolution, -ray light curve of 2009 Nov. - 2010 March are reported. A break around 6.5 days is suggested by the SF analysis, the power index slopes being between 3 hours and 6.5 days, and between 6.5 and about 26 days, while at longer lags spurious drops due to the finite range become apparent. The PDS analysis confirms these values ( at high frequency and at low frequency). The temporal behavior of 3C 454.3 is therefore showing universality from 3-hours to 11-months timescales. The 6.5-day break, consistently confirmed by the PSD and more clearly depicted by the SF, represents a steepening towards longer lags (flattening towards higher frequencies) and does not necessarily imply a local characteristic time scale, as it could simply be the point where two PDS components with different slopes are equally strong. Gamma-ray variability in 3C 454.3 can be seen as a short term realization of a stochastic mechanism, where structures that are resolved in shorter observations are simply averaged out in long observations, and where big outbursts correspond to statistical tails of the same process.

The CWT in Figure 2 provides a local and detailed time series analysis, through the two-dimensional energy density function (modulus of the transform, filled color contour) computed using a Morlet waveform, providing the best tradeoff between localization and period/frequency resolution. For timescales below 1 day no local peaks are found, although some marginal features in this time range are found during the outburst state. The big outburst of December 2009 is, in fact, localized and decomposed in a chain of well-defined power CWT peaks. The 6.5 days timescale is confirmed by the major peak out of the cone of influence (localized at about MJD 55166, i.e, the onset of the outburst, MJD 55166.2 - 55172). A second energetic peak in this period is found at about 2.5 days manifesting another dominating timescale during the outburst, while in the second period of the outburst two minor power peaks at about 19h and 1.3 days are also visible. Based on this CWT local analysis there is no evidence for structure on time scales shorter than about 12 hours but shorter time scales close to the sampling scale cannot be ruled out.

The 1 GeV daily light curve, shown in Fig. 3 top, closely resembles the 100 MeV light curve, hinting at little spectral variability. This behavior is confirmed by the very limited variation of the photon spectral index measured at MeV, displayed in Figure 3 bottom by the daily average photon index (open blue symbols) as well as the weekly-averaged ones (solid black points). The near constancy of the spectrum is in accord with the results found from the July 2008 flare and the first 6-months of LAT data (Abdo et al., 2009, 2010d).

The variation of the amplitude of the weekly photon indices is only =0.35 (varying between 2.35 and 2.7) during the period under consideration, but the variation is statistically significant. Comparing the weekly photon indices to their weighted average returns a reduced =86.4/32, corresponding to a 10 probability for a nonvariable signal. Particularly notable is a slight softening of the spectrum during the periods of lowest fluxes, particularly during the periods of MJD 55221-55235 and 55264-55278. There is also a suggestion that a progressive hardening over several weeks precedes a major outburst, but more such events will be needed to establish whether this behavior is typical.

The correlation between daily spectral index and flux was further investigated by computing a correlation function for four segments of the November 2009 - April 2010 time range. In the first three segments (Dec 2009 flare, flare decay and inter flare region) we find evidence for a lag such that spectral index variations lead the flux by about 5 days. In contrast the correlation during the April 2010 flare is weak and if anything shows a lag in the opposite sense. Although the significance of the lag in these data is only about 2 we do see the same 5-day lag also in the data from the 2008 flare.

Figure 4 top left (right) presents the weekly- (daily-) averaged power-law photon spectral index vs. flux above . A weak “harder when brighter” effect shows up for weekly bins, but is almost washed out when considering daily bins. To make the trend clearer, photons were sorted in 3 daily-flux bins (2.5, , and , where is the photon flux above in units of ph cm s) and the analysis was repeated with the resulting photon files. The result, displayed as magenta points in the top right panel of Figure 4, still exhibits a slight harder when brighter effect. The data point at corresponds to the December 2 flare and is consistent with the trend observed at lower flux. The three other panels in Figure 4 show the photon spectral index vs. flux patterns for the three rapid flares, obtained either with a 6-hour binning (middle left and bottom left) or a 3-hour binning (middle right). The light curves at (not above 100 MeV, as in Fig. 1) calculated at the time of the main flaring episodes are displayed in the insets of Figure 1. Despite the flux reaching the highest values for a non-GRB cosmic source, the statistical significance of these patterns is marginal, except for the MJD 55167 flare. Instead of a well-defined, universal pattern, a variety of patterns is found. The MJD 55167 flare is associated with a clockwise pattern, with a flux-doubling accompanied by an essentially constant (or weakly harder) photon spectral index. The reduced for a constant fit of the photon spectral index is 28.6/9. The pattern is somewhat indicative of a “hard-lag” effect possibly reflecting particle acceleration (Kirk & Mastichiadis, 1999). The short MJD 55170 flare shows an indication for a counterclockwise loop ( = 6.0/7). The loop diagram for this flare on 3-hour timescales reveals the simplest ordered pattern, in this case a softening followed by a flux increase which then decays in flux and hardness. This could reflect the underlying timescale on which coherent variability takes place in 3C 454.3. Because this pattern does not recur in other flaring episodes, no strong conclusions can be made, however. The MJD 55195 flare shows some softening during the plateau (points 3-6) following the flux rise as expected from a cooling behavior, but the significance is low ( = 8.6/9). While it is difficult to draw any firm conclusion on acceleration and cooling from these patterns, the lack of strong spectral variability still provides clues to the underlying physical processes.

Figure 5 shows the flux and photon spectral index as a function of time in the period around (blue symbols) and during (red symbols) the time of the target of opportunity when the Fermi LAT was in pointed mode (MJD 55291.82-55294.13). The binning is 6 hour and 3 hour for the survey and pointed modes respectively. As expected by the 3.5 fold increase in exposure per unit time during the ToO, the statistical accuracy in the measurement of both parameters improves significantly. Although in a high state, the source was unfortunately fairly steady during this period. No indication for variability more rapid than that observed during the giant outburst is found during the ToO period, as already noted by Foschini et al. (2010). The photon spectral index vs. flux above E measured in 3-hour time bins is plotted in Figure 6. The reduced for a constant fit of the photon spectral index is 18.52/16, indicating that the data are consistent with a constant value. The correlation coefficient is 0.26.

Figure 7 shows the integrated spectrum from Period 1, MJD 55121-55165, Period 2, MJD 55166-55173 (week of the giant outburst), Period 3, MJD 55174-55262 and Period 4 MJD 55280-55300. The distributions have been fitted with a broken power law, a log parabola function and a power law with exponential cutoff function. The log parabola gives a worse fit than the broken power law and the power law with exponential cutoff functions, which are difficult to discriminate for these periods. The fitted parameters are given in Table 1 for the four periods.

The variation of break energy (cutoff energy) with flux is displayed in the left (right) panel in Figure 8 at different observing periods. No strong evolution of either the break energy or the cutoff energy is found, but there is some indication of a slight hardening with flux. For a given flux, the position of the break energy is slightly different from that observed during the bright outburst in 2008, but all E (and E) are constant within a factor of . For the same periods Striani et al. (2010) found fairly large spectral variability with the AGILE data, with a photon spectral index as low as 1.600.32 during big flares. This behavior is not confirmed by the present analysis.

The maximum photon energy found within the 95% containment radius from the location of 3C 454.3 during the period MJD 55140-55261 was a photon with GeV at MJD 55179.98, when ph cm s and the variability time day. On December 2, when the average of over this day exceeded ph cm s, the highest energy was 8.5 GeV. As already noted, the flux variations during this flare were on timescales as short as a few hours or less. The energy of the most energetic photon during periods of rapid flux changes provides the strongest constraint on the opacity, as discussed below.

4 Discussion

A photon flux of ph cm s from 3C 454.3 at implies an apparent isotropic -ray luminosity above 100 MeV of erg s. This is times larger than the luminosity of the blazar PKS 1502+106 during its August 2008 flare (Abdo et al., 2010c), but still lower than the luminosity of PKS 1622-297 ( with the current cosmological model) during the 1995 flare (Mattox et al., 1997). The time-averaged -ray luminosity (Table 1) measured with the Fermi LAT is and erg s for periods 1 and 2, respectively. Estimates for the black-hole mass in 3C 454.3 range from (Bonnoli et al., 2010) to (Gu et al., 2001). To be radiating below the Eddington luminosity of 1.26 erg s for a 10 Solar mass black hole implies that the high-energy radiation is beamed into a jet with opening angle

The light curves from Fig. 1 show evidence for variability timescale of few hours and the model fitted to a very brief subflare at MJD 55170 implies a flux doubling timescale of . However, if the bulk of the flare were characterized with such a short timescale, we would expect a very erratic light curve calculated with daily binning. Because the overall shape of the November/December 2009 flare is smooth, the dominating variability timescale is rather close to . The short subflares may reflect existence within or outside the main emitting zone of geometrical substructures as compact as .

The minimum Doppler factor ], where is the angle from the jet axis to the line of sight, is defined by the condition , and can be estimated to % accuracy compared to results of more detailed numerical calculations through the expression

(2)

(Dondi & Ghisellini, 1995; Ackermann et al., 2010), where is the spectrum of 3C 454.3 measured at frequency , and is the maximum photon energy during the period in which is measured. The flux in eq. (2) is evaluated at from the pair-production threshold condition. Writing erg cm s in eq. (2) gives and (10 GeV). Contemporaneous Swift XRT observations give the flux between 0.2 and 10 keV, with erg cm s (e.g., Bonnoli et al., 2010), so that .

The value of the Doppler factor can also be constrained from the argument that the energy flux from the Synchrotron Self-Compton (SSC) component should be below that observed at soft X-rays, in terms of isotropic luminosities . SSC luminosity is related to the synchrotron (SYN) luminosity via in the Thomson limit, where is the energy density of synchrotron radiation and is the energy density of magnetic field. Noting that Lorentz transformation of bolometric luminosity is , we obtain

(3)

This can be combined with a constraint from the external-Compton (EC) and synchrotron luminosities ratio,

(4)

(Dermer, 1995), where is the energy density of external radiation. Eliminating from these equations the magnetic field value, we obtain

(5)

On the other hand, we can eliminate the Doppler factor and obtain a lower limit on the magnetic field

(6)

Order-of-magnitude reference values of isotropic luminosities , and have been deduced from Fig. 4 in Bonnoli et al. (2010). If the source region is located within the broad-line region (BLR), the energy density of external radiation is , where is the luminosity of the broad emission lines and is the characteristic radius of the BLR. We approximate with GALEX measurement of Ly line, and adopt based on reverberation scaling relations for CIV line (Bonnoli et al., 2010; Kaspi et al., 2007).

The analysis of radio observations made at a different epoch gives , bulk Lorentz factor , and observing angle obtained from superluminal observations (Jorstad et al., 2005). Both our constraints on the Doppler factor are consistent with this result and would become even tighter, if we adopt a shorter variability timescale. Hence, we take (). The constraint on the value of the magnetic field is a few times the equipartition magnetic field , where erg cm s is the observed synchrotron peak flux, Hz is the synchrotron peak frequency and is the product of the bolometric correction factor and ratio of energy contents in protons and electrons (e.g., Finke et al., 2008).

For a conical geometry of opening angle , the location of the emitting region for the December flare is constrained to be at distance pc; i.e., towards the outer parts of the BLR. A narrow jet with opening angle , places the emitting region further out, and could be consistent with a fragmentation of outflow (Marscher & Jorstad, 2010). The most rapidly varying flaring episodes suggest locations at the sub-pc scale, contrary to conclusions from coherent optical polarization changes in 3C 279 (Abdo et al., 2010e) and PKS 1510-089 (Marscher et al., 2010) over timescales of tens of days, which suggest that the emitting regions are several pc from the black hole. Larger distances would be inferred if or . Higher factors would conflict with the expected source density of the parent population of FSRQs, as we discuss later. Narrow jets are suggested by radio observations (Pushkarev et al., 2009; Jorstad et al., 2005) and could result from recollimation shocks at the pc scale (e.g., Nalewajko & Sikora, 2009; Bromberg & Levinson, 2009) that reduce the characteristic size of the emission region. A multiwavelength radio, mm, optical, and X-ray campaign covering observations of 3C 454.3 between 2005 and 2008 shows coherent optical and mm flux and polarization episodes consistent with the brightest events taking place at the mm core located pc beyond the acceleration and collimation zone (Jorstad et al., 2010). Without strong collimation or recollimation, the short observed variability timescale implies a very small value (Tavecchio et al., 2010) with an associated low radiative efficiency. Alternately, flaring episodes with short variability times might take place within the BLR, whereas the more slowly varying emissions could be radiated by jet plasma at larger distances. Spectral variations due to the different target photon sources might be concealed by mixing from components made at small and large radii. “Residual” collisions at large radii might also make a slowly varying underlying emission components, as similarly inferred for GRB observations (Li & Waxman, 2008).

The large changes in flux exhibited by the -ray light curves in Fig. 1 could be due to several different factors, including a changing mean magnetic field, electron number, Doppler factor, target photon density and spectrum as the jet moves outward, or some combination of these factors. Any such explanation must also account for the moderate spectral changes, including the near constancy of (Fig. 8), while the flux changes by over an order of magnitude.

One possibility is related to scattering of a target photon field in the Klein-Nishina regime. Compton scattering takes place in the Thomson limit when the energy of the photon to be scattered is (in units) in the electron rest-frame. Since the radiation from ultrarelativistic electrons is seen only when they are moving very close to the line of sight, that energy for is , where is the average energy of the target photons in the lab frame. Hence, the scattering is in the Thomson regime provided the upscattered photon energies are , i.e. for , independent of the Doppler factor (compare Georganopoulos et al., 2001).

If the break energy observed in 3C 454.3 at 2 GeV is due to the transition to scattering in the KN regime, then the underlying target photon energy is close to the energy of the Ly photon at 10.2 eV. We have tested this possibility by comparing the Compton-scattered spectrum from a power-law electron distribution with a monochromatic Ly photon source with the Fermi LAT data. The spectrum is independent of , though can depend on maximum and minimum electron Lorentz factors. As shown in Fig. 9, the spectrum is too hard to fit the data, and treatment of KN effects on cooling (Dermer & Atoyan, 2002; Moderski et al., 2005; Sikora et al., 2009) or the addition of other soft photon sources will reduce the sharpness of the break. The difficulty to fit the sharp spectral break with a single power-law electron distribution is in accord with the conclusion of Abdo et al. (2009) that this break reflects a complex electron spectrum. To obtain a good spectral fit to the -ray spectrum of 3C 454.3, Finke & Dermer (2010) use a broken power-law electron distribution and a multi-component Compton-scattering model. The robustness of in this model is due to similar, dependence of accretion disk and external radiation energy density within the BLR.

Although Abdo et al. (2009) excluded the possibility of explaining the spectral break with photon-photon pair absorption, Poutanen & Stern (2010) proposed that significant intrinsic absorption can be provided by He II Lyman- line at and continuum at . However their model implies the location of the gamma-ray production is in the inner edge of the BLR and inefficient scattering in the KN regime is predicted to lead to significant hardening of synchrotron spectra in IR/optical bands. Further studies are required to verify whether such effect is in contradiction with multiwavelength spectra created within a one-zone model.

If and the jet opening angle , then the beaming factor for a two-sided top-hat jet is . Within the framework of the unification hypothesis for radio galaxies (Urry & Padovani, 1995), FRII radio galaxies are the parent population of FSRQs. The space density of FRII radio galaxies at 0.8 z 1.5 is Mpc (Gendre et al., 2010). At redshift unity, the volume of the universe Mpc. Therefore, if all FRII radio galaxies were misaligned FSRQs similar to 3C 454.3, then the implied number of FSRQs is Mpc Mpc. This number is similar to the number, 100, of -ray blazars at redshift unity (Abdo et al., 2010b), so is in accord with the unification scenario. This simple argument suggests that unless , in which case the total jet energy of an individual FSRQ blazar would be correspondingly larger, the typical bulk Lorentz factor for FSRQs would not be .

5 Summary

The correlated spectral and temporal properties of 3C 454.3 during two very strong flaring episodes, during which the source was the brightest object in the -ray sky, have been studied. The -ray spectrum of 3C 454.3 shows a significant spectral break between – 3 GeV that is very weakly dependent on the flux state, even when the flux changes by an order of magnitude. The light curves during periods of enhanced activity in July – August 2008 and December 2010 show strong resemblance, with a flux plateau of a few days preceding the major flare. The spectral index measured on a daily basis shows a very moderate “harder when brighter” effect for fluxes measured at , where MeV is chosen to minimize spurious correlations resulting from the choice of the low-energy bound on the range. However, the weekly spectral index displays a more significant variation, but not exceeding =0.35 when the flux varies by more than a factor of 10. Indication for a gradual hardening preceding a major flare and extending for several weeks is found. No recurring pattern in the photon spectral index/flux plane measured at during the course of flaring episodes has been identified. Flux variations of a factor of 2 have been observed over time scales as short as a few hours, though only weak variability was observed during the time of the Target of Opportunity pointing of the Fermi Telescope towards 3C 454.3.

From opacity constraints, we derive a minimum Doppler factor from the flux, variability time, and highest energy photon measurements. This value is in accord with independent measurements of from superluminal motion observations (Jorstad et al., 2005). The behavior of the break energy has also been investigated. Spectral softening due to the onset of Klein-Nishina effects in Compton scattering, which is independent of Doppler factor for a power-law electron distribution, was considered as the origin of the -ray spectrum. The magnitude of the softening for such a model was found to be inadequate to fit the spectrum without introducing intrinsic breaks in the underlying electron spectrum. An independent estimate of and also gives values of ; also several G. The short flaring times suggest an origin of the emission region within the BLR, but uncertainties in parameters are compatible with the production of emission from 3C 454.3 on the pc scale.

The Fermi LAT Collaboration acknowledges generous ongoing support from a number of agencies and institutes that have supported both the development and the operation of the LAT as well as scientific data analysis. These include the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Department of Energy in the United States, the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique / Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules in France, the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana and the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in Japan, and the K. A. Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish National Space Board in Sweden. Additional support for science analysis during the operations phase is gratefully acknowledged from the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica in Italy and the Centre National d’Études Spatiales in France.

References

  • Abdo et al. (2009) Abdo, A. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 817
  • Abdo et al. (2010a) —. 2010a, ArXiv e-prints 1004.0348
  • Abdo et al. (2010b) —. 2010b, ApJ, 715, 429
  • Abdo et al. (2010c) —. 2010c, ApJ, 710, 810
  • Abdo et al. (2010d) —. 2010d, ApJ, 710, 1271
  • Abdo et al. (2010e) —. 2010e, Nature, 463, 919
  • Ackermann et al. (2010) Ackermann, M., et al. 2010, ArXiv e-prints 1005.2141
  • Atwood et al. (2009) Atwood, W. B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071
  • Bonning et al. (2009) Bonning, E., et al. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2332, 1
  • Bonnoli et al. (2010) Bonnoli, G., Ghisellini, G., Foschini, L., Tavecchio, F., & Ghirlanda, G. 2010, ArXiv 1003.3476
  • Bromberg & Levinson (2009) Bromberg, O., & Levinson, A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1274
  • Dermer (1995) Dermer, C. D. 1995, ApJ, 446, L63+
  • Dermer & Atoyan (2002) Dermer, C. D., & Atoyan, A. M. 2002, ApJ, 568, L81
  • Dondi & Ghisellini (1995) Dondi, L., & Ghisellini, G. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 583
  • Escande & Tanaka (2009) Escande, L., & Tanaka, Y. T. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2328, 1
  • Finke & Dermer (2010) Finke, J. D., & Dermer, C. D. 2010, ApJ, 714, L303
  • Finke et al. (2008) Finke, J. D., Dermer, C. D., & Böttcher, M. 2008, ApJ, 686, 181
  • Foschini et al. (2010) Foschini, L., Tagliaferri, G., Ghisellini, G., Ghirlanda, G., Tavecchio, F., & Bonnoli, G. 2010, ArXiv e-prints 1004.4518
  • Fuhrmann et al. (2006) Fuhrmann, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 445, L1
  • Gendre et al. (2010) Gendre, M. A., Best, P. N., & Wall, J. V. 2010, MNRAS, 450
  • Georganopoulos et al. (2001) Georganopoulos, M., Kirk, J. G., & Mastichiadis, A. 2001, ApJ, 561, 111
  • Ghisellini et al. (2007) Ghisellini, G., Foschini, L., Tavecchio, F., & Pian, E. 2007, MNRAS, 382, L82
  • Giommi et al. (2006) Giommi, P., et al. 2006, A&A, 456, 911
  • Gu et al. (2001) Gu, M., Cao, X., & Jiang, D. R. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 1111
  • Jorstad et al. (2010) Jorstad, S. G., et al. 2010, ArXiv 1003.4293
  • Jorstad et al. (2005) —. 2005, AJ, 130, 1418
  • Kaspi et al. (2007) Kaspi, S., Brandt, W. N., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Schneider, D. P., & Shemmer, O. 2007, ApJ, 659, 997
  • Kirk & Mastichiadis (1999) Kirk, J. G., & Mastichiadis, A. 1999, Astroparticle Physics, 11, 45
  • Krimm et al. (2009) Krimm, H. A., et al. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2330, 1
  • Li & Waxman (2008) Li, Z., & Waxman, E. 2008, ApJ, 674, L65
  • Marscher & Jorstad (2010) Marscher, A. P., & Jorstad, S. G. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
  • Marscher et al. (2010) Marscher, A. P., et al. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
  • Mattox et al. (1997) Mattox, J. R., Wagner, S. J., Malkan, M., McGlynn, T. A., Schachter, J. F., Grove, J. E., Johnson, W. N., & Kurfess, J. D. 1997, ApJ, 476, 692
  • Moderski et al. (2005) Moderski, R., Sikora, M., Coppi, P. S., & Aharonian, F. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 954
  • Nalewajko & Sikora (2009) Nalewajko, K., & Sikora, M. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 1205
  • Pacciani et al. (2010) Pacciani, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, L170
  • Poutanen & Stern (2010) Poutanen, J., & Stern, B. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
  • Pushkarev et al. (2009) Pushkarev, A. B., Kovalev, Y. Y., Lister, M. L., & Savolainen, T. 2009, A&A, 507, L33
  • Sakamoto et al. (2009) Sakamoto, T., D’Ammando, F., Gehrels, N., Kovalev, Y. Y., & Sokolovsky, K. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2329, 1
  • Sasada et al. (2009) Sasada, M., et al. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2333, 1
  • Sikora et al. (2009) Sikora, M., Stawarz, Ł., Moderski, R., Nalewajko, K., & Madejski, G. M. 2009, ApJ, 704, 38
  • Striani et al. (2010) Striani, E., et al. 2010, ArXiv e-prints
  • Striani et al. (2009a) —. 2009a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2322, 1
  • Striani et al. (2009b) —. 2009b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2326, 1
  • Tavecchio et al. (2010) Tavecchio, F., Ghisellini, G., Bonnoli, G., & Ghirlanda, G. 2010, MNRAS, L68+
  • Urry & Padovani (1995) Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
  • Vercellone et al. (2009a) Vercellone, S., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 690, 1018
  • Vercellone et al. (2010) —. 2010, ApJ, 712, 405
  • Vercellone et al. (2009b) —. 2009b, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2344, 1
  • Villata et al. (2006) Villata, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 817
  • Villata et al. (2009) Villata, M., Raiteri, C. M., Larionov, V. M., Konstantinova, T. S., Nilsson, K., Pasanen, M., & Carosati, D. 2009, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2325, 1
Figure 1: The light curve of the flux of 3C 454.3 in the MeV – GeV band (red). The light curve of the July - August 2008 flare, shifted by 511 days, is shown for comparison (magenta). The insets show blow-ups of the two periods when the largest relative flux increases took place. The red, blue, and green data points in the insets correspond to daily, 6 hr, and 3 hr averaged fluxes, respectively. The fit results discussed in the text are displayed as solid curves.

Figure 2: Top panel: structure function of the 3h-bin flux light curve for the period 2009 Nov. 5 - 2010 Mar. 4 and corresponding power density spectrum (inset). Bottom panel: plane contour plot of the continuous Morlet wavelet transform power density for the same light curve. Thick black contours are the 90% confidence levels of true signal features against white/red noise background, and cross-hatched regions represent the “cone of influence”, where spurious edge effects become important.
Figure 3: Top: Light curve of the flux in the GeV – GeV band. Bottom: Variation of the daily (blue points) and weekly (black points) photon spectral index derived from a power-law fit. The black line depicts the mean weekly spectral index.
Figure 4: Photon spectral index vs. flux measured on a weekly (upper left) and daily (upper right) basis are shown by blue points. The averages over periods with daily fluxes , , , where is the photon flux above in units of ph cm s, are shown by the magenta data points in the upper right panel. Middle left, middle right, and bottom panels show photon index vs. flux for the MJD 55167, MJD 55170 and MJD 55195 flares, respectively. The labels refer to the different times of the light curve as shown in the insets.
Figure 5: Flux (filled data points; left-hand axis) and photon index (open data points; right-hand axis) as a function of time in the period surrounding the ToO pointing. Data collected in survey mode (6-hour binning) are in blue, those collected in pointed mode are in red (3-hour binning)
Figure 6: Photon spectral index vs flux on 3-hour timescales during the time of the ToO pointing.
Figure 7: distributions of the Fermi LAT data for different time periods, along with the fitted broken power law (solid), log parabola (dashed) and power law+exponential cutoff (dotted) functions.

Figure 8: Left: vs flux for different time periods (given in MJD). Right: vs flux for the same time periods.
Figure 9: Model for the -ray spectrum of 3C 454.3 when a power-law electron distribution Compton scatters Ly photons. Best fit electron number index . Model is insensitive to values of lower and upper comoving electron Lorentz factors and provided and . The Klein-Nishina softening from a power-law electron distribution gives a poor fit to the data.
period E E
(MeV) (MeV)
1 2.31 0.02 3.190.12 1810 2.520.03 0.110.02 5200900
2 2.33 0.03 3.290.21 2750 2.480.03 0.090.02 2.25 70001700
3 2.32 0.02 3.120.08 1630 2.540.02 0.120.01 2.24 5100620
4 2.38 0.02 3.230.14 2380 2.550.03 0.100.02 2.30 70001300
Table 1: Parameters of the functions fitted to the spectra for the different periods considered in Figure 7.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
236890
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description