Femtosecond frequency comb measurement of absolute frequencies and hyperfine coupling constants in cesium vapor
Abstract
We report measurements of absolute transition frequencies and hyperfine coupling constants for the , , , and states in vapor. The stepwise excitation through either the or intermediate state is performed directly with broadband laser light from a stabilized femtosecond laser optical-frequency comb. The laser beam is split, counter-propagated and focused into a room-temperature Cs vapor cell. The repetition rate of the frequency comb is scanned and we detect the fluorescence on the branches of the decay of the excited states. The excitations to the different states are isolated by the introduction of narrow-bandwidth interference filters in the laser beam paths. Using a nonlinear least-squares method we find measurements of transition frequencies and hyperfine coupling constants that are in agreement with other recent measurements for the 8S state and provide improvement by two orders of magnitude over previously published results for the 9S and 7D states.
pacs:
42.62.Fi, 42.62.Eh, 32.30.-r, 32.10.FnI Introduction
The basic ideas of using repetitive pulses and mode-locked lasers for high-resolution precision spectroscopy were originally developed in the 1970’s, with particular focus on Doppler-free two-photon transitions Teets et al. (1977); Baklanov and Chebotayev (1977); Eckstein et al. (1978); Salour (1978); Hänsch et al. (1975); Hänsch and Wong (1980). The advent of fully stabilized optical frequency combs Jones et al. (2000); Holzwarth et al. (2000) in 2000 renewed interest in many spectroscopic applications of mode-locked lasers (for a review see Ref. Stowe et al. (2008)). In many instances the use of direct frequency-comb spectroscopy (DFCS) offers many advantages over spectroscopy done with cw lasers. In particular, the spectral versatility provided by modern frequency combs allows the simultaneous study of multiple atomic transitions with a single experimental setup. Additionally, DFCS allows for a relatively simple determination of the absolute frequency by providing a direct link to the S.I. second. In this work we exploit this versatility to study multiple transitions in cesium (Cs).
Precision spectroscopy of Cs plays an important role in atomic and fundamental physics, including measurements of atomic parity violation Wood et al. (1997); Bennett and Wieman (1999); Guena et al. (2005), searches for the permanent electric dipole moment of an electron Murthy et al. (1989); Nataraj et al. (2008), photon recoil measurements that help determine the fine structure constant Wicht et al. (2002); Gerginov et al. (2006), measurements of the distribution of nuclear charge and magnetization Gerginov et al. (2003), and numerous applications in laser cooling, Bose-Einstein condensation Leggett (2001), atomic clocks Wynards and Weyers (2005), and magnetometers Budker and Romalis (2007).
The present work focuses on measuring multiple transition frequencies and the hyperfine structure of select low-lying states in cesium via two-photon excitation. The relatively simple experimental setup uses a room-temperature Cs vapor cell and a self-referenced optical frequency comb to excite Doppler-free two photon transitions from the Cs ground state to the , , , and states. Our results are consistent with previous measurements for the well-studied state Hagel et al. (1999); Fendel et al. (2007) and provide significantly reduced uncertainties for the , , and states Weber and Sansonetti (1987).
This paper is structured as follows: Section II contains a description of our experimental system and measurements. In Section III we examine the features of the fluorescence spectra and discuss the theoretical model used to describe the results. Section IV describes the analysis of the two-photon transitions and the recipe used in extracting the transition energies. This section also includes our results and the details of the systematic effects. We conclude our work in Section V.
Ii Experimental Setup
The relevant Cs energy levels are shown in Fig. 1. The excitation pathways to the four states , , , or proceed through a stepwise excitation through either the or states. We detect the two-photon excitation as blue fluorescence emission as the atoms decay from the states to the ground state.
The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 2. We excite the cascaded two-photon transitions using a mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser that generates a broad optical frequency comb. The portion of the output spectrum that was used extended from 650 nm to 1000 nm, covering all of the excitation transitions of interest in Fig. 1. The laser is described in detail in Ref. Fortier et al. (2006) and here we only briefly mention the information relevant for the experiment. The Kerr-lens mode-locked Ti:Sapphire ring laser produces an output spectrum consisting of discrete equally spaced coherent optical modes. The frequency of each optical mode, , can be related to two microwave frequencies, the laser repetition rate, , and the carrier-envelope offset frequency, , by
(1) |
where is an integer mode number . The carrier-envelope-offset frequency is stabilized by use of an -to- interferometer, thus “self-referencing” all modes of the comb Jones et al. (2000). For the measurements described here was stabilized to 45 MHz. The repetition rate of the laser is GHz. The repetition rate was phase-locked to a signal generator that was referenced to a hydrogen maser. With the comb stabilized in this way, the fractional instability of every optical frequency of the comb is , where is the averaging period in seconds.
The laser beam was split by use of a 50-50 nonpolarizing beam-splitting cube (BS 2). The two output laser beams were linearly polarized along the same axis. The beams were filtered by use of either narrow-band interference filters or a combination of long-pass and short-pass filters to select specific transition pathways. The counter-propagating beams were then focused by lenses of 25 cm focal length to a spot size of m inside the vapor cell. Focusing the beams to a smaller waist size increases the two-photon excitation rate, but also leads to broadening of the resonances due to the finite transit-time of the atoms through the beams. The transit-time broadening for a waist of this size is about 2 MHz for room-temperature Cs atoms. The average optical intensities in the vapor cell were tens of spread over nm bandwidth, corresponding to optical frequencies.
An evacuated Pyrex Cs vapor cell was used in the experiment. The cell has a diameter of 2.5 cm and is a wedged shape with an optical path length ranging from 0.5 cm - 1 cm. Windows were fused directly to the cell at an angle. The cell was carefully cleaned and filled on an oil-free vacuum system and was evacuated to a base pressure of Pa. A small amount of Cs was introduced into the cell prior to removing it from the vacuum system. The cell temperature was varied by resistive heater wires wound around the cell. We note that we observed shifts in the transition frequencies as large as 0.5 MHz in a Cs vapor cell that was not cleaned and vacuum processed as carefully as the cell used in these measurements.
Most of the measurements in this experiment were taken with the Cs cell temperature at 297 K, with fluctuations less than 1 K. Data were taken at higher temperatures to evaluate systematic shifts arising from pressure shifts as described in Section IV.2.
A set of six coils was used to zero out the earth’s magnetic field in the region of the vapor cell. The field was reduced to a level of over the interaction region inside the vapor cell.
Two-photon resonance signals were monitored by measuring the (, ) cascade fluorescence at 459 nm and 455 nm. The fluorescence was collected at a right angle to the two counter-propagating beams and was detected by a photomultiplier tube. The detector was shielded from background light and the scattered light from the excitation laser beams by a 457.9 nm filter with a 10 nm pass band (F3). The detector output was amplified and filtered (low-pass at 1 kHz, 6 dB/octave) before being sampled and recorded with a computer-controlled data acquisition board (DAQ).
The DAQ used in these measurements is similar to that used in Refs. Gerginov et al. (2006, 2003, 2004). The computer controlled the scan of the repetition rate by stepping the frequency of the signal generator to which the repetition rate was phase locked. Data scans were collected by changing the frequency of the signal generator from MHz to MHz in 1 Hz steps. This 3 kHz range in the repetition rate results in a 2-3 GHz variation in the two-photon frequency, depending on the transition. At each 1 Hz step the fluorescence was digitized with multiple samples and averaged for 1 s. The statistical mean and the uncertainty in the mean were evaluated at each repetition rate frequency. Spectra were collected for both increasing and decreasing frequency scans, resulting in 6002 data points.
Iii Observed Spectra and Theoretical Considerations
Figure 3 shows the spectrum collected as the repetition rate of the frequency comb was scanned without using the filters marked as F1 and F2 in Fig. 2. The spectrum consists of a multitude of narrow Doppler-free peaks and a Doppler-broadened background. The narrow peaks are due to excitation to the 8S, 9S and 7D states by two counter-propagating photons, while the Doppler-broadened background is due to excitation from two co-propagating photons. The observed spectrum is quite complicated because of the numerous discrete frequencies present in the comb combined with the multiple atomic energy levels and transition pathways accessible.
The spectrum is greatly simplified and the Doppler background is eliminated by introducing filters F1 and F2, as shown in Fig. 2. The presence of the filters restricts the transitions and enables the selection of individual excitation pathways. Figure 4 shows the spectrum observed when one of the counter-propagating laser beams is restricted to be between 845 nm to 855 nm and the other between 780nm to 800 nm. With this combination, the first beam can excite the atoms on only the transition at 852 nm (the transition) and the second beam can only excite the atoms on the transition at 795 nm. This eliminates excitations to the , , and states, as well as the excitation to the state through the state and removes the Doppler-broadened background. The resulting spectrum consists of groups of two or three peaks. The peaks labeled , , and form one such spectral group and are shown in more detail in Fig. 5. Each spectral group is the result of excitation from a given ground-state hyperfine level to a given excited-state hyperfine level, and the individual peaks in the group correspond to specific transition pathways through every allowable hyperfine level of the intermediate state. For example, the , , and peaks in Fig. 5 all correspond to excitation from the the () ground state to the () excited state. The three peaks correspond to excitation through the () intermediate states. We see the groups recur as a different pair of optical modes is resonant with a given transition. This repeating pattern occurs at intervals of kHz, corresponding to a change in the two-photon optical frequency of GHz (i.e., the laser mode spacing). For a given group of three peaks there are three different velocity classes that satisfy the resonance condition for each of the corresponding hyperfine components of the intermediate level. For another group of three peaks, the resonant condition for the components of the intermediate level is satisfied by a different pair of comb modes, and by different velocity classes. Thus, the amplitudes of the peaks arising from the same ground, excited, and intermediate states are not the same in the different spectral groups.
We can understand and calculate the spectra using the standard two-photon transition probabilities derivable from second-order time-dependent perturbation theory. We start by considering a transition of an atom in the ground state with total angular momentum , , to an excited state with total angular momentum , via excitation by two cw lasers with angular frequencies and , intensities and , and wave vectors and . Here refers to the principal quantum number of the excited state. We further assume that is close to the resonant frequency for the transition, with or . The probability of the atom to make a transition is Demtröder (2003)
(2) |
where is the velocity of the atom, , , and are the projections of the total angular momenta , , and along the axis of quantization, is the electric dipole operator, is the unit vector along the direction of the polarization for the first(second) laser beam, is the homogeneous line width of the state , and is the resonant angular frequency of the transition . For a given light polarization, specified by the vector component in the spherical basis , the matrix elements for the different magnetic sublevels can be related to reduced matrix elements that do not depend on the magnetic sublevels or the total angular momentum (, , or ) by use of the Wigner-Eckart theorem and standard Clebsch-Gordan relations as Sobelman (1996)
(3) |
Here is the nuclear spin and the and terms are the usual 3- and 6- symbols. Thus, the transition probabilities for different ground-state angular momenta and excited-state angular momenta can be related to a common factor by use of the appropriate Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. If we assume the two laser beams are counter-propagating then examination of Eq. 2 reveals that for a given transition from the ground state with angular momentum , through an intermediate state with angular momentum , to a final state with the transition probability will be a maximum when
(4) | ||||
and | ||||
(5) |
If we now consider the effect of having a number of discrete frequencies, coming from the different modes of the comb, we see that, as a result of the detuning from the intermediate state, only two near-resonant comb modes will contribute substantially to the transition probability. Because the spacing of the frequencies for the comb, GHz, is much larger than the homogeneous linewidths of the states, MHz, we are justified in considering only the two modes closest to the resonance conditions of Eqs. (4) and (5). Since these two frequencies are coming from the comb, they are related to the offset frequency and repetition rate of the comb by two integers as
(6) | ||||
(7) |
Substituting these relations into Eqs. (4) and (5) we see that for a given pair of modes, and , and a fixed value of the offset frequency there exists a unique repetition-rate frequency and velocity that will simultaneously satisfy both resonance conditions. Therefore, given an atomic sample with a broad enough velocity distribution, there will exist a repetition-rate frequency that will result in a stepwise resonant excitation of the two-photon transition for a specific velocity class. This leads to the narrow Doppler-free peaks seen in Fig. 4. Because the velocity class excited and the resonant repetition-rate frequency both depend on the energy of the intermediate state, the transition resonance for each different intermediate state occurs at different repetition rates. Because a different velocity class contributes to the different peaks, the amplitudes of the peaks vary greatly, depending on the number of atoms that are present in the resonant velocity class.
Iv Analysis and Results
iv.1 Analysis
We calculated the excitation probabilities by numerically integrating Eq. 2 over a Gaussian velocity distribution for optical modes near the resonant condition. A total of optical modes were used (10 for the first stage excitation and 5 for the second stage excitation). The calculated spectra agree quite well with the experimental spectra (Fig. 4). Slight variations in the relative amplitudes of the peaks are attributed to slight deviation of the polarization of the excitation light from linear.
The resonant frequencies for a transition from a ground state with a specific to an excited state with are related to the center-of-gravity frequencies and the hyperfine coupling constants through (see e.g. Corney (1979))
(8) |
where .
The repetition rates at which the calculated resonances occur depend on the center-of-gravity frequencies for the two stages of the excitation and the hyperfine and constants of the ground, intermediate, and final states. Spectra were calculated with different values of the two-photon center-of-gravity frequency and hyperfine coupling constants of the final excited state. The intermediate state energy and coupling constants used in the calculated spectra were fixed to the values determined from Gerginov et al. Gerginov et al. (2004, 2006). The two-photon transition center-of-gravity frequencies and the hyperfine coupling constants and were extracted from the experimental data by least-squares comparison of the experimental resonant repetition-rate frequencies with the resonant repetition-rate frequencies determined from the calculated spectra.
The resonant repetition rate for each of the peaks in both the experimental and calculated spectra were determined from a least-squares fit. Fitting the spectra was necessary in order to account for the overlap of the different peaks. The calculated spectra were assumed to have a Lorentzian line shape. However, the experimental spectra were found to be well described by a line shape of a Gaussian coupled to a Lorentzian,
(9) |
where and are the Gaussian and Lorentzian amplitudes, respectively, and are the Gaussian and Lorentzian widths, is the line center of the peak, and is a constant base-line offset. We attribute the deviation of the experimental line shape from the expected Lorentzian line shape to residual misalignment of the two beams, which we discuss further below. We designate the resonant repetition-rate frequency for the peak determined by fitting the calculated spectra for a given , , and by . The resonant repetition-rate frequencies determined from the experimental spectra we designate as . The best fit values for two-photon frequency and the hyperfine constants were determined by minimizing the weighted function
(10) |
with respect to , , and . Here is the standard uncertainty in determined by the fit to the experimental data. For peaks and all three parameters (, , and ) one would expect the minimum value of the to be . We consistently observed larger values of the . We attribute this uncertainty to residual misalignment, which will be discussed in more detail below. In order to account for this larger value, we normalize the function so that its minimum corresponds to the expected value. We then determine the uncertainty in the two-photon optical frequency and the hyperfine coupling constants by finding the values of , , and where the normalized function increases by one from the point at which it is a minimum. This amounts to increasing the uncertainty to make the frequencies extracted from the different peaks self consistent.
iv.2 Results for the state
The spectral range of the comb allowed the state to be studied by use of transitions through either the (895 nm and 761 nm) or (852 nm and 795 nm) states. This redundancy provided a check for consistency of the measurement and the parameter extraction method. A complete study of the systematics was performed only for the transitions that occurred through the states.
Figure 6 shows the spectrum for the transition along with the calculated spectrum. The spectrum was collected by use of a 890 nm filter with a 10 nm passband for F1 and a combination of a 755 nm filter with a 40 nm pass band with a long-pass filter at 715 nm for F2. The 13 peaks, labeled through in Fig. 6, were used to extract the transition frequencies. The peaks were acquired with both increasing and decreasing scans of , resulting in 26 individual peaks. By use of the procedure described above, the extracted center-of-gravity two-photon frequency and the hyperfine constant for the state were found to be MHz and MHz. The was 31 for 26 peaks. Here the uncertainties are determined from the function, as described in Section IV.1, and do not include any systematic uncertainties.
The transition is shown in Fig. 4. For this spectrum, one of the counter-propagating laser beams was filtered with an interference filter centered at 850 nm with a 10 nm pass band. This resulted in an average intensity of in the interaction region, spread over optical modes. This light served to excite the first step of the two-photon transition at 852 nm. Based on the transmission profile of the filter we estimate that we have of light in the optical mode resonant with the transition. The second stage of the transition was selected by use of a combination of a 800 nm short-pass filter and a 780 nm long-pass filter and provided 70 over modes. Using the procedure described above we fit the 14 peaks labeled in the figure and find a center-of-gravity frequency of MHz and a hyperfine coupling constan MHz, where again, the uncertainties are determined purely from the function. The value of the was 64 for 28 peaks (14 peaks from both the increasing and decreasing frequency scans) prior to the normalization. As described in Section IV.1 the uncertainties are increased to make the consistent with the expected value. The resulting frequencies are in good agreement with the value extracted from the transition through the state.
We analyzed in detail the systematic effects that could lead to a shift of the measured frequencies from the true transition frequencies using the transitions to the state through the state. Systematic shifts might be more significant for excitation through the state, because of the smaller hyperfine structure shifts of the state, relative to the state. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum excited through the state was higher than that excited through the state, as an artifact of the filters used in the measurements.
We considered four possible sources of systematic effects: ac Stark shifts, Zeeman shifts, pressure shifts, and errors arising from misalignment of the counter-propagating laser beams. The associated uncertainties are summarized in Tab. 1 and described below.
To evaluate the systematics we focused on the peaks labeled , , and in Fig. 4. A typical data set and fit to the peaks is shown in Fig. 5. The effect of ac Stark shifts on the extracted frequencies was investigated by varying the optical powers. Neutral density filters were used to reduce the power in both beams by approximately the same amount. Data were collected at three optical powers ranging from the maximum power, which was used for collection of the full spectrum shown in Fig. 4, to of the maximum power. The three peaks used in this analysis correspond to the transitions. Because the final state is the same for all three peaks, it is not possible to extract both the center-of-gravity frequency and the hyperfine constant from these data. In order to place a limit on possible effects due to the ac Stark shifts on the center-of-gravity frequency, we fixed the hyperfine constant to the value determined from the analysis of the full spectrum and then extracted a center-of-gravity frequency at each power by finding the minimum in the function as defined by Eq. (10). The center-of-gravity frequencies as a function of power were fitted to a straight line. We used the slope of the line to look for any possible dependence of the center-of-gravity frequency on the power. We find the slope to be , where is the normalized operating power. Combining the value of the slope with its uncertainty we arrive at a maximum possible shift of 166 kHz at the the nominal operating power, . We take this value as an estimate of the systematic uncertainty from the ac Stark effect. Because we fix the hyperfine constant this approach provides an upper limit on the center-of-gravity frequency. Therefore, we do not attempt to apply a correction to the data. To determine the possible effect on the hyperfine splitting we fix the center-of-gravity frequency to the value determined from the analysis of the full spectrum and extract the hyperfine constant from the data. Fitting the data for the constant we found a slope of , resulting in an uncertainty of 94 kHz.
For two-photon transitions between S states with there is no linear Zeeman shift. However, the laser polarization is not perfectly linear and these states are step-wise resonant through the intermediate P states, which are magnetically sensitive. In addition, the power on the first stage of the transition is near saturation, so there may be some optical pumping that could couple with an external magnetic field to lead to asymmetric line shapes. To investigate the effect of Zeeman-shifts due to imperfect cancelation of stray magnetic fields, data were collected without the compensation coils and also with the current through the compensation coils reversed, thus doubling the residual magnetic field. Again, the peaks labeled , , and in Fig. 4 were used. The value of the hyperfine constant was fixed and the center-of-gravity frequency was extracted as described above. We see no evidence for a systematic shift as the magnetic field is increased (Fig. 7). The standard deviation of the data is 70 kHz, which we take as the uncertainty associated with the magnetic field. A similar analysis for the hyperfine constant (with the center-of-gravity frequency fixed) also shows no evidence of any shift with the magnetic field. Using the standard deviation of the points shown in Fig. 7 as an estimate of the uncertainty we assign a 40 kHz uncertainty to the constant due to possible magnetic fields.
For an analysis of the shifts due to collisions, the pressure of the Cs vapor was changed by heating the vapor cell as described above. Data were taken at temperatures of 297, 318.6, and 345.5 K, corresponding to Cs vapor pressures of 0.15, 1.2, and 11 mPa. As described above, we determine the center-of-gravity frequency with a fixed hyperfine constant for each pressure. We see no indication of any variation of the data with the Cs vapor pressure (Fig. 7). The standard deviation of the frequencies extracted at the different temperatures is 31 kHz, which we take as the uncertainty in the center-of-gravity frequency due to temperature or pressure effects. For the hyperfine constant, the scatter in the data taken at different temperatures gives a standard deviation of 18 kHz, which we adopt as the uncertainty.
The final systematic considered was possible error due to imperfect alignment of the counter-propagating laser beams. The effect of misalignment of the two beams is to broaden and shift the peaks through a first-order Doppler shift. As can be seen from Eq. (2), the position of the peaks depends on the difference in the magnitude and direction of the two vectors and as well as the velocity class excited. Additional first-order Doppler shifts come into play if the wavefronts of and are not precisely counter-propagating, which can result from divergence of the counter-propagating beams and mismatch of the spatial modes. For a spectrum that contains many peaks coming from many different velocity classes the shift due to the misalignment largely averages out. This effect was investigated theoretically by modifying the program to include the effect of misalignment of the two beams. This was done by changing the term in Eq. (2) to include an additional perpendicular velocity component. For the 8S state three spectra were calculated with different angles of misalignment. Analysis of the calculated spectrum and an estimate of the maximum possible misalignment of the beams gives a conservative limit on possible effects from angular misalignment of 22 kHz for the center-of-gravity frequency and 20 kHz for the hyperfine constant. If we attribute the scatter in the experimental results to angular misalignment, we conclude that for all the spectra, the effective angular deviation due to either misalignment or to divergence and mode mismatch of the beams is less than 0.04 radians. We note that for the calculated data the misalignment of the counter-propagating laser beams leads to no significant shift in the extracted frequency, it does lead to a larger spread of the data and an increased value of , as observed. This additional spread of the data beyond what is expected from the statistical noise is taken into account by conservatively increasing the uncertainties to achieve the expected , as described in Section IV.1.
In addition, the effect of misalignment was investigated experimentally on the transition. The study of this transition confirmed that while the individual peaks do shift, there was no shift in the mean value of the transition frequency, within the uncertainty of our measurement.
The non-zero second-order Doppler shift is about 300 Hz for this transition and is negligible compared to the other uncertainties.
Table 1 summarizes the corrections and associated uncertainties on the extracted center-of-gravity and hyperfine constants. We see no evidence for any shift that is larger than the uncertainty associated with evaluating the effect. As our final value we take the mean of the frequencies determined from the and intermediate states, weighted by their respective statistical uncertainties, and apply the corrections and systematic uncertainties (propagated in quadrature) listed in Table 1. We find final values for the center-of-gravity frequency and hyperfine constant of state of
These results are in good agreement with previous measurements of the state, summarized in Table 2.
iv.3 Results for the state
Figure 8 shows the spectrum obtained for the cascaded two-photon transition and the calculated spectrum. This spectrum was collected by use of a 850 nm filter with a 10 nm passband for F1 and a 658 nm filter with a 10 nm passband for F2. The measurement of the state through the intermediate state was not possible because the complementary radiation at 635.5 nm was on the edge of the laser bandwidth.
The peaks - were used to determine the center-of-gravity frequency and the hyperfine constant as described above. The extracted center-of-gravity frequency is MHz and the hyperfine constant is MHz. The was 83 for 32 peaks.
The systematic effects due to ac-Stark shifts, Zeeman shifts, pressure shifts, and misalignment effects were investigated in the same way as they were for the state. The systematic effects were studied by focusing on the three peaks labeled , , and in Fig. 8, corresponding to transitions from the ground state hyperfine level to the excited state hyperfine level through the , 3, and 4 intermediate hyperfine levels.
The laser intensity for both transitions was varied. For the stage of the transition the variation was from to and was spread over optical modes. A linear fit of the center-of-gravity frequency to the power gave a dependence of where is the normalized operating power. We therefore assign a 169 kHz uncertainty to the center-of-gravity frequency due to possible light shifts (Fig. 9). Similarly, for the hyperfine constant we found a linear dependence consistent with zero slope, . We take 79 kHz uncertainty to be the uncertainty in the constant due to possible ac-Stark shifts.
As with the state, no discernable dependence of the frequency on the external magnetic field was observed (Fig. 9). Based on the scatter (standard deviation) of the data we arrive at an uncertainty of 18 kHz for the center-of-gravity frequency and 7 kHz for the hyperfine constant.
Spectra were taken at four different temperatures of the vapor cell corresponding to Cs vapor pressures of 0.15, 1.06, 3.9, and 7.6 mPa. The dependence of the center-of-gravity frequency is shown in Fig. 9. There is evidence of a possible shift in the frequency with pressure. However, even at pressures that are 50 times larger than the nominal operating pressure, we see only a 67 kHz shift. We again use the standard deviation of the data to place a conservative limit on possible uncertainties due to pressure shifts and find a 34 kHz uncertainty in the optical frequency due to temperature dependent effects. A similar analysis for the hyperfine constant gives an uncertainty due to temperature dependent effects of 15 kHz.
An analysis of the frequency dependence on misalignment done in the same way as described above yielded a 58 kHz uncertainty for the center-of-gravity frequency and 20 kHz for the hyperfine constant.
The uncertainties to the center-of-gravity frequency and the hyperfine constant are summarized in Table 1.
We arrive at a final value for the center-of-gravity frequency for the transition and the hyperfine constant of the state of
This is in good agreement with the previous measurements of this transition, summarized with other data in Table 2, and improves on the center-of-gravity frequency by two orders of magnitude.
iv.4 Results for the state
The center-of-gravity frequency, magnetic dipole, and electric quadrupole hyperfine coupling constants for the state were determined from the spectrum in Fig. 10. The filters used in collecting this spectrum were a 890 nm filter with a 10 nm passband for F1 and a 670 nm filter with a 30 nm passband for F2. This spectrum was taken by exciting Cs through the intermediate state. Use of the state eliminates possible transitions to the state due to angular momentum selection rules. The groups consist of six peaks, corresponding to the and transitions. The 18 peaks labeled through in Fig. 10 were used to extract the frequency and hyperfine coupling constants.
The 7D state has and, consequently, an electric quadrupole coupling denoted by the hyperfine constant. Minimizing the function defined by Eq. (10) with respect to the center-of-gravity frequency and the hyperfine and constants, we find a value for the center of gravity of MHz, a hyperfine constant value of MHz, and a hyperfine constant value of . The was for 36 peaks.
The systematic effects were studied by focusing on the six peaks labeled , , , , , and in Fig. 10, corresponding to transitions from the ground state. The laser intensity on both stages of the transition was varied. For the stage, the change in intensity ranged from to , spread over optical modes within the 10 nm (3.8 THz) filter bandwidth. The slope of the center-of-gravity frequency as a function of light power yields a dependence of kHz (Fig. 11), corresponding to an uncertainty of 49 kHz. We find uncertainties due to ac-Stark shifts of 14 kHz for the constant and kHz for the constant.
No effect of the external magnetic field was observed (Fig. 11), within the measurement uncertainties. Based on the scatter of the data, we assign uncertainties of 17 kHz, 3 kHz, and 17 kHz for the center-of-gravity frequency, the hyperfine constant and the hyperfine constant, respectively.
Spectra were taken at four different temperatures of the vapor cell, corresponding to a Cs vapor pressure of 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, and 2.0 mPa. As with the state, there appears to be a small dependence of the center-of-gravity frequency as a function of the pressure in the cell, leading to a 28 kHz shift when the pressure is increased by a factor of . However, since we fix the and constants, this serves as a maximal shift in the center-of-gravity frequency and we do not attempt to correct for this shift. We take the standard deviation as a conservative estimate of the error and assign an uncertainty of 12 kHz to the center-of-gravity frequency due to possible temperature-dependent effects. The hyperfine constant shows no such dependence and the scatter is less than the uncertainty on the mean. We therefore use the uncertainty on the weighted mean of the data taken at different temperatures to arrive at an uncertainty of 1 kHz for the hyperfine constant. For the hyperfine constant we find an 11 kHz uncertainty (from the scatter of the data).
A theoretical analysis of the frequency dependence on misalignment similar to that described for the state analysis yielded a 48 kHz uncertainty for the center-of-gravity frequency and uncertainties of 12 kHz for the hyperfine constant and 143 kHz for the constant. In addition, the effects of misalignment were investigated experimentally. Spectra of the six peaks labeled , , , , , and in Fig. 10 were taken at three different beam alignments. The degree of misalignment was characterized by the peak amplitude. Misalignment of the beams so that the peak amplitudes decreased by more than a factor of two resulted in no detectable change in the center-of-gravity, constant, or constant.
The uncertainties to the center-of-gravity frequency and the hyperfine constant are summarized in Table 1.
iv.5 Results for the state
Figure 12 shows the experimental fluorescence spectra for excitation of the and states through the state along with the calculated spectra for excitation to the and states. The spectrum was collected using a 850 nm filter with a 10 nm passband for F1 and a 700 nm filter with a 25 nm passband for F2. The close energy spacing of the and states did not allow for a selection of only one of the states when excited through the state. However, because we were able to determine the state energy and hyperfine splitting as described in Section IV.4, we were able to fix the frequency of the state from these measurements and use the spectrum shown in Fig. 12 to extract information about the state. In addition, angular momentum considerations result in much stronger transition probabilities for the transition compared to the transition. To remove the effect of the overlap, we calculated the spectrum through the state using the values determined by the excitation. Figure 13 shows the contribution of the transitions to the to the fluorescence spectrum. We superposed that calculated spectrum on the experimental spectrum and adjusted the peak intensities to match the isolated peaks. In this way we accounted for and removed the parameters. To quantify the influence of the state and estimate the uncertainty resulting from the overlapped spectra, we fit the spectra with and without subtracting the spectrum from the state. We found a maximum deviation of 10 kHz in the center-of-gravity frequency of the state, 1 kHz in the hyperfine constant, and 30 kHz in the hyperfine constant which we take to be the uncertainties due to this overlap. The contributions from the two transitions are separated in Fig. 13.
For a given ground state hyperfine component , there are nine distinct transitions due to the manifold of intermediate states and upper states. The five groups of peaks labeled in Fig. 12 were used to extract values for the center-of-gravity and hyperfine and constants. In group one, only three peaks were of sufficient amplitude to be fit. All nine peaks were fit in groups three and five. Seven peaks were used in group two and six peaks in group four. From the fit to these 34 peaks we determined the center-of-gravity frequency to be MHz and the hyperfine and constants were MHz and MHz, respectively. To improve the precision of the fits, we use scans with increasing frequency and decreasing frequency simultaneously. The minimum was for 34 peaks prior to normalization.
The systematics were studied in the same way as with the previous states. We focused on group four of Fig. 13 due to its size and also the fact that there is very little contribution from the state for this group. The optical intensity was varied for both stages of the transition. For the first stage the intensity over the 10 nm bandwidth was varied from to . Data were taken at cell temperatures corresponding to saturated vapor pressures of 0.15, 1.05, 3.9, and 8.5 mPa. The dependence of the center-of-gravity on the varied parameters is shown in Fig. 14 and are summarized in Table 1.
As with the previous transitions there was no significant shift arising from the light power. A linear fit gave a slope of , where is the normalized operating power. This gives us an uncertainty of 85 kHz in the center-of-gravity frequency. We found uncertainties in the hyperfine and constants of 11 kHz and 458 kHz, respectively.
Unlike the other transitions studied here, we did observe a dependence of the center-of-gravity on the magnetic field (Fig. 14). There was clear evidence of broadening in the peaks at the largest magnetic fields. We attribute the shift to a break down of the line-shape model as the line broadens coupled with the overlap of the peaks. In this case, we base our estimate of the uncertainty on the difference of the point taken at the zeroed field with the residual field and find an uncertainty of 35 kHz in the optical frequency. There is no evidence for a dependence of the extracted hyperfine constant, and we find a magnetic-field uncertainty of 6 kHz for it. For the constant we find an uncertainty of 125 kHz.
We see no clear evidence for any temperature dependent effects. Using the larger of standard deviation or the uncertainty in the mean, we find uncertainties of 7 kHz, 1 kHz, and 38 kHz for the temperature-dependent uncertainties of the center-of-gravity frequency, the hyperfine constant, and the hyperfine constant, respectively
Applying these uncertainties we find
V Conclusions
We have used the technique of velocity-selective two-photon excitation to measure the center-of-gravity frequencies and the hyperfine coupling constants for the , , , and states of Cs. The results for all of the transitions are summarized and compared to other published experimental values in Table 2. This technique has potential metrological applications for secondary frequency standards at optical wavelengths. At a more fundamental level, the hyperfine coupling measurements are valuable in improving atomic structure calculations. The measurement accuracy of multiple transitions at significantly different wavelengths rivals that of cw laser spectroscopy techniques and demonstrates the versatility of direct frequency comb spectroscopy.
Our measured transition frequencies are in good agreement with previous measurements, while achieving greater accuracy for the , , and states. In these measurements the uncertainties were typically limited by signal-to-noise ratio and fitting uncertainties combined with uncertainties in the determination of the ac Stark shifts and geometrical factors.
Effect | ||||||||||
ac Stark | 166 | 94 | 169 | 79 | 49 | 14 | 17 | 85 | 11 | 458 |
B-Field | 70 | 40 | 18 | 7 | 17 | 3 | 17 | 35 | 6 | 125 |
Cs Vapor Pressure | 31 | 18 | 34 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 38 |
Alignment | 22 | 20 | 58 | 20 | 48 | 12 | 143 | 34 | 7 | 180 |
Overlap of | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 1 | 30 |
Statistical | 24 | 13 | 58 | 30 | 28 | 20 | 72 | 25 | 4 | 86 |
Total | 186 | 106 | 192 | 88 | 77 | 15 | 164 | 102 | 15 | 517 |
Measurement | Center-of-Gravity Frequency | Hyperfine Constant | Hyperfine Constant |
---|---|---|---|
This Work | 219.14(11) | - | |
Fendel et al. Fendel et al. (2007) | 219.125(4) | - | |
Hagel et al. Hagel et al. (1999) | 219.12(1) | - | |
This Work | 109.93(9) | - | |
Weber & Sansonetti Weber and Sansonetti (1987) | - | - | |
Farley et al. Farley et al. (1977) | - | 110.1(5) | - |
Gupta et al. Gupta et al. (1973) | - | 109.5(2.0) | - |
This Work | 7.386(15) | -0.18(16) | |
Weber & Sansonetti Weber and Sansonetti (1987) | - | - | |
Kortyna et al. Kortyna et al. (2008) | - | 7.36(3) | -0.1(2) |
Auzinsh et al. Auzinsh et al. (2007) | - | 7.4(2) | - |
This Work | -1.717(15) | -0.18(52) | |
Weber & Sansonetti Weber and Sansonetti (1987) | - | - | |
Auzinsh et al. Auzinsh et al. (2007) | - | -1.56(9) | - |
Vi Acknowledgements
We thank Hugh Robinson for insightful advice and preparation of the Cs vapor cell. We are grateful to Jose Almaguer, Nate Newbury, and Todd Johnson for carefully reading the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions and discussions. One of us (VM) was supported in part by the DST(RSA) PDP through the National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA). CET acknowledges partial support from the National Science Foundation through grant number PHY99-87984.
Footnotes
- Corresponding author: jason.stalnaker@oberlin.edu
- Present address: P. O. Box 755, Durban, KWAZULU-NATAL, 4000, RSA.
- Present address: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116, Germany
- Present address: P.O. Box 60157, Sunnyvale, CA 94088
References
- R. Teets, J. Eckstein, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 760 (1977).
- Y. V. Baklanov and V. P. Chebotayev, Appl. Phys. 12, 97 (1977).
- J. N. Eckstein, A. I. Ferguson, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 847 (1978).
- M. M. Salour, Rev. Mod. Phys 50, 667 (1978).
- T. W. Hänsch, S. A. Lee, R. Wallenstein, and C. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 307 (1975).
- T. W. Hänsch and N. C. Wong, Metrologia 16, 101 (1980).
- D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, Science 288, 635 (2000).
- R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, T. W. Hänsch, J. C. Knight, W. J. Wadsworth, and P. S. J. Russel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2264 (2000).
- M. C. Stowe, M. J. Thorpe, A. Pe’er, J. Ye, J. E. Stalnaker, V. Gerginov, and S. A. Diddams, Advances in Atomic Molecular, and Optical Physics 55 (Academic Press, New York, 2008).
- C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Science 275, 1759 (1997).
- S. C. Bennett and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484 (1999).
- J. Guena, M. Lintz, and M. A. Bouchiat, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B 22, 21 (2005).
- S. A. Murthy, D. Krause, Z. L. Li, and L. R. Hunter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 965 (1989).
- H. S. Nataraj, B. K. Sahoo, B. P. Das, and D. Murkherjee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 033002 (2008).
- A. Wicht, J. M. Hensley, E. Sarajlic, and S. Chu, Phys. Scr. T102, 82 (2002).
- V. Gerginov, K. Calkins, C. E. Tanner, J. J. McFerran, S. Diddams, A. Bartels, and L. Hollberg, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032504 (2006).
- V. Gerginov, A. Derevianko, and C. E. Tanner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 072501 (2003).
- A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001).
- R. Wynards and S. Weyers, Metrologia 42, S64 (2005).
- D. Budker and M. V. Romalis, Nature Phys. 3, 227 (2007).
- G. Hagel, C. Nesi, L. Jozefowski, C. Schwob, F. Nez, and F. Biraben, Opt. Commun. 160, 1 (1999).
- P. Fendel, S. D. Bergeson, T. Udem, and T. W. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 32, 701 (2007).
- K.-H. Weber and C. J. Sansonetti, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4650 (1987).
- T. M. Fortier, A. Bartels, and S. A. Diddams, Opt. Lett. 31, 1011 (2006).
- V. Gerginov, C. E. Tanner, S. Diddams, A. Bartels, and L. Hollberg, Phys. Rev. A 70, 042505 (2004).
- W. Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003), 3rd ed.
- I. I. Sobelman, Atomic Spectra and Radiative Transitions (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996), 2nd ed.
- A. Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1979).
- J. Farley, P. Tsekeris, and R. Gupta, Phys. Rev. A 15, 1530 (1977).
- R. Gupta, W. Happer, L. K. Lam, and S. Svanberg, Phys. Rev. A 8, 2792 (1973).
- A. Kortyna, V. Fiore, and J. Farrar, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062505 (2008).
- M. Auzinsh, K. Bluss, R. Ferber, F. Gahbauer, A. Jarmola, M. S. Safronova, U. I. Safronova, and M. Tamanis, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022502 (2007).