Feasible homopolar dynamo with sliding liquid-metal contacts

# Feasible homopolar dynamo with sliding liquid-metal contacts

Jānis Priede Raúl Avalos-Zúñiga Applied Mathematics Research Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom CICATA-Qro, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Cerro Blanco 141, Colinas del Cimatario, Querétaro, Mexico
###### Abstract

We present a feasible homopolar dynamo design consisting of a flat, multi-arm spiral coil, which is placed above a fast-spinning metal ring and connected to the latter by sliding liquid-metal electrical contacts. Using a simple, analytically solvable axisymmetric model, we determine the optimal design of such a setup. For small contact resistance, the lowest magnetic Reynolds number, at which the dynamo can work, is attained at the optimal ratio of the outer and inner radii of the rings and the spiral pitch angle In a setup of two copper rings with the thickness of and self-excitation of the magnetic field is expected at a critical rotation frequency around

###### keywords:
Homopolar dynamo, Liquid metal, Sliding contacts

## 1 Introduction

The homopolar dynamo is one of the simplest models of the self-excitation of magnetic field by moving conductors which is often used to illustrate the dynamo action that is thought to be behind the magnetic fields of the Earth, the Sun and other cosmic bodies (Moffatt78, ; ARAA96, ). In its simplest form originally considered by Bullard (Bullard-1955, ), the dynamo consists of a solid metal disc which rotates about its axis, and a wire twisted around it and connected through sliding contacts to the rim and the axis of the disc. At a sufficiently high rotation rate, the voltage induced by the rotation of the disc in the magnetic field generated by an initial current perturbation can exceed the voltage drop due to the ohmic resistance. At this point, initial perturbation starts to grow exponentially leading to the self-excitation of current and its associated magnetic.

This simple model has a number of important extensions and modifications. For example, the Rikitake model (Rikitake58, ) consisting of two coupled disc dynamos is known to generate an oscillating magnetic field with complex dynamics (Plunian-1997, ). The latter study is based on a modified model using a radially sectioned disc with azimuthal current added at the rim. This modification eliminates the unphysical growth of the magnetic field in the limit of perfectly conducting disc (Moffatt-1979, ). Using the same model we recently showed that dynamo can be excited by the parametric resonance mechanism at substantially reduced rotation rate when the latter contains harmonic oscillations in certain frequency bands (PAP10, ).

Despite its simplicity no successful implementation of the disc dynamo is known so far. The problem appears to be the sliding electrical contacts which are required to convey the current between the rim and the axis of the rotating disc. Electrical resistance of the sliding contacts, usually made of solid graphite brushes, is typically by several orders of magnitude higher than that of the rest of the setup. This results in unrealistically high rotation rates which are required for dynamo to operate (RadRhe02, ). To overcome this problem we propose to use liquid-metal sliding electrical contacts similar to those employed in homopolar motors and generators (Maribo-etal10, ). The aim of this letter is to develop a feasible design of the disc dynamo which could achieve self-excitation at realistic rotation rates.

## 2 Physical and mathematical models

The principal setup of the proposed disc dynamo shown in Fig. 1 consists of a stationary coil (1) made of a copper disc sectioned by spiral slits and a fast-spinning disc (2) placed beneath it, which is electrically connected to the former by sliding liquid electrical contacts (3). The coil is supported by the holders which are not shown in this basic view. The liquid metal is hold in vertical state by the centrifugal force. Such a compact and symmetric design not only minimizes the electrical resistance in the system but also makes it amendable to simple analysis which is carried out in the following.

To simplify the analysis both discs are subsequently assumed to be thin coaxial rings of thickness the outer radius and the inner radius where the ratio of the inner and outer radii. The rings are separated by a small axial distance and connected to each other at their rims through the sliding liquid-metal electrical contacts. The design of the stationary top ring, which forms a compact coil consisting of spiral sections is described in detail below. The bottom ring is mounted on an axle which is driven by an electric motor with the angular velocity The electric current is induced by the rotation of the bottom ring in the magnetic field generated by the same current returning through the coil formed by the top ring. In the solid rotating ring, the current is assumed to flow radially with the linear density which decreases due to the charge conservation inversely with the cylindrical radius Current returns through the top ring where it is deflected by the spiral slits that produce an azimuthal component proportional to the radial one:

 Jϕ=−Jrβ=I0β2πr, (1)

where the pitch angle of the current lines relative to the radial direction. The shape of slits following the current lines is governed by and given by the logarithmic spirals

 ϕ(r)=ϕ0−βlnr, (2)

where is the azimuthal angle. The electric potential distribution in the coil ring follows from Ohm’s law

 \boldmathJ=I02πr(−\boldmather+β\boldmatheϕ)=−σd\boldmath∇φc, (3)

as

 φc(r,ϕ)=I02πσd(lnr−βϕ).

Thus, the potential difference along the current line between the rims of the ring is

 Δφc=[φc(r,ϕ(r))]RoRi=−I02πσd(1+β2)lnλ. (4)

The potential difference across the bottom ring, which rotates as a solid body with the azimuthal velocity is defined by the radial component of Ohm’s law for a moving medium

 Jr=I02πr=σd(−∂rφd+vϕBz),

where is the axial component of the magnetic field. Integrating the expression above over the ring radius we obtain

 −I02πlnλ=σd(−Δφd+ΩΦd), (5)

where is the potential difference across the rotating ring and is the magnetic flux through it. Using the relation the latter can be expressed in terms of the azimuthal component of the magnetic vector potential as

 Φd=[rAϕ]Ror=Ri. (6)

In the stationary state, which is assumed here, the potential difference induced by the rotating ring in Eq. (5) is supposed to balance that over the coil defined by Eq. (4) as well as the potential drop over the liquid-metal contacts with the effective resistance

 Δφd=Δφc+RI0. (7)

This equation implicitly defines the marginal rotation rate at which a steady current can sustain itself.

To complete the solution we need to evaluate the magnetic flux (6) through the rotating disc. The azimuthal component of the vector potential appearing in Eq. (6) is generated by the respective component of the electric current which is present only in the coil. Thus, we have

 Aϕ(r,z)=μ04π2π∫0R0∫RiJϕ(r′)cosϕr′dr′dϕ√r′2−2r′rcosϕ+r2+z2,

where is the axial distance from the coil ring carrying the azimuthal current defined by Eq. (1). Note that the poloidal currents with radial and axial components circulating through the rings and liquid-metal contacts produce purely toroidal magnetic field, which is parallel to the velocity of the rotating ring and, thus, do not interact with the latter. In the plane of the ring the double integral above can be evaluated analytically as

 Aϕ(r,0)=μ0βI08π2[F(Ri/r)−F(Ro/r)],

where the function

 F(x) =(1−x)K(m+)+(1+x)E(m+), (8) +sgn(1−x)[(1+x)K(m−)+(1−x)E(m−)]

which is produced by the computer algebra system Mathematica (Mathematica, ) in terms of the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind, and , of the parameter (AbSt72, ), is plotted in Fig. 2(a). Taking into account that , the magnetic flux (6) can be written as

 Φc=μ0βI0Ro8π2¯Φ(λ), (9)

where

 ¯Φ(λ)=F(λ)+λF(λ−1)−4(1+λ) (10)

is a dimensionless magnetic flux, which is plotted in Fig. 2(b) versus the radii ratio

In the following, we assume the axial separation between the rings to be so small that the magnetic flux through the rotating ring is effectively the same as that through the coil, i. e., Substituting the relevant parameters into Eq. (7) we eventually obtain

 Rm=μ0σdRoΩ=4π(¯R−(2+κβ2)lnλ)κβ¯Φ(λ), (11)

which is the marginal magnetic Reynolds number defining the dynamo threshold depending on the spiral pitch angle the radii ratio and the dimensionless contact resistance

The case of solid rotating ring considered above corresponds to whereas corresponds to the rotating ring sectioned similarly to the stationary one except for the opposite direction of the spiral slits. As seen from the expression above, the latter case is equivalent to the former with both and reduced by a factor of

Now, let us determine the optimal and that yield the lowest for a given In the simplest case of a negligible contact resistance, which corresponds to Eq. (11) yields It means that attains a minimum at which corresponds to the optimal pitch angles of and for only one and both rings sectioned. The respective lowest values of , and , are attained at the same optimal radii ratio of (see Fig. 3 for the case of only one ring sectioned). The minimal increases with which also causes a steep reduction of the optimal radii ratio and a comparably fast rise of the pitch angle (see Fig. 4).

## 3 Feasible setup

Finally, let us evaluate the rotation rate required for self-excitation in a setup with the outer radius of and the ring thickness of First, we need to estimate electrical resistance of sliding liquid-metal contacts. A suitable metal for such contacts may be the eutectic alloy of GaInSn (Maribo-etal10, ), which is liquid at room temperature with the kinematic viscosity electrical conductivity (Mue-Bue, ). Assuming the contact gap width of and the inner radius we have The resistance of the outer contact is by a factor of lower than Then the dimensionless contact resistance can be estimated as

 ¯R=2πσCudRi(1+λ)≈σCuσGaInSnδRi(1+λ)≈0.2

If only one disc is sectioned, which is easier to manufacture, the respective magnetic Reynolds number in Fig. 4(a) is This corresponds to the rotation frequency which is well within the operation range of standard AC electric motors. The respective linear velocity of the outer edge of the ring is around At this velocity the tensile stress at the rim of the ring, is more than by an order of magnitude below the yield strength of annealed Copper (Li-Zinkle12, ). The optimal inner radius following from Fig. 4(b) is not far from the value assumed above. The respective pitch angle for is about

The number of spiral arms is determined by the following arguments. The current distribution defined by Eq. (1) can hold only in the inner parts of the ring which are radially confined between the spiral slits. This ideal distribution is expected to break down at the rims, which are radially exposed to the edges of the ring located at the nearly equipotential metal liquid contacts. In order to confine this perturbation to the outer rim with Eq. (2) suggests that equally distributed spiral slits are required.

The last critical issue is the viscous power losses associated with the turbulent drag acting on the outer sliding contacts at high shear rates. These losses can be estimated as where the area of the outer sliding contact, is the turbulent shear stress, and is the Darcy friction factor for turbulent pipe flow with the Reynolds number (MarSon87, ).

In conclusion, the proposed disc dynamo design appears feasible in terms of both the disc spinning rate and the power required to drive it. Note that the relatively large setup size is due to the turbulent energy dissipation which scales as Namely, reducing the system size by one third would require about five times higher power input to achieve self-exitation of the magnetic field.

## Acknowledgment

R.A.-Z. is grateful to the National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) for funding the projects CB-168850 & 131399.

## References

• (1) H.K. Moffatt, Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids. Cambridge, 1978.
• (2) R. Beck, A. Brandenburg, D. Moss, A. Shukurov, D. Sokolov, “Galactic magnetism: recent developments and perspectives,” Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34 (1996) 155–206.
• (3) E.C. Bullard, “The stability of a homopolar dynamo,” Proc. Camb., Phil. Soc. 51 (1955) 744–760.
• (4) T. Rikitake, “Oscillations of a system of disk dynamos,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 54 (1958) 89–105.
• (5) F. Plunian, Ph. Marty, A. Alemany, “Chaotic Behavior of the Rikitake dynamo with symmetric mechanical friction and azimuthal currents” Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 454 (1997) 1835–1842.
• (6) H.K. Moffatt, “A self-consistent treatment of simple dynamo systems,” Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam. 14 (1979) 147–166.
• (7) J. Priede, R. Avalos-Zúñiga, F. Plunian, “Homopolar oscillating-disc dynamo driven by parametric resonance,” Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 584–587.
• (8) K.-H. Rädler, M. Rheinhardt, “Can a disc dynamo work in the laboratory?” Magnetohydrodynamics 38 (2002) 211–217.
• (9) D. Maribo, M. Gavrilash, P. J. Reilly, W.A. Lynch, N.A. Sondergaard, “Comparison of Several Liquid Metal Sliding Electric Contacts,” Proceedings of the 56th IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (HOLM) (2010) 1–7.
• (10) S. Wolfram, Mathematica: A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer, Addison-Wesley, 1991.
• (11) M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions, Dover, New York, 1972.
• (12) U. Müller, L. Bühler, Magnetofluiddynamics in Channels and Containers, Springer, Berlin, 2001 (Appendix A.1)
• (13) M. Li, S.J. Zinkle, “Physical and Mechanical Properties of Copper and Copper Alloys,” In: R.J.M. Konings (ed.), Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, vol 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012, pp. 667–690.
• (14) D. Maribo, N.A. Sondergaard, “Further studies of a low-melting point alloy used in a liquid metal current collector,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology 10 (1987) 452–455.
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters

224213

How to quickly get a good answer:
• Keep your question short and to the point
• Check for grammar or spelling errors.
• Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description