# Factorization and resummation of t-channel single top quark production

###### Abstract

We investigate the factorization and resummation of t-channel single top (antitop) quark production in the SM at both the Tevatron and the LHC in SCET. We find that the resummation effects decrease the NLO cross sections by about at the Tevatron and about at the LHC. And the resummation effects significantly reduce the factorization scale dependence of the total cross section. The transfer momentum cut dependence and other matching scale dependencies are also discussed. We also show that when our numerical results for s- and t-channel single top production at the Tevatron are combined, it is closer to the experimental result than the one reported in the previous literatures.

## I Introduction

Top quark is an interesting particle in the standard model (SM) because of its large mass. It may play a special role in the electroweak symmetry breaking mechanism. Its properties such as mass :2009ec (), lifetime Amsler20081 (), spin, couplings to other particles and production mechanism deserve to be studied precisely.

The hadronic production of the single top production provides an important opportunity to study the charged weak current interactions of the top quark, e.g., the structure of the the vertex Bernreuther:2008ju (). Besides, it is a background for many new physics processes. However, due to the difficulties to discriminate its signatures from the large background, it is only recently that D0 Abazov:2009ii () and CDF Aaltonen:2009jj () collaborations have observed the single top production at the Tevatron.

In the three main production modes of the top quark, the t-channel is specially important because of its largest cross section, which has been extremely studied, including the next-to-leading order (NLO) corrections in Bordes:1994ki (); Stelzer:1995mi (); Harris:2002md (); Sullivan:2004ie (); Campbell:2004ch (); Cao:2004ky (); Cao:2005pq (). Their results show that the NLO corrections are about and at the LHC and Tevatron, respectively. Also, parton shower Monte Carlo simulation was considered in Frixione:2005vw (); Alioli:2009je (). Threshold resummation for this process was calculated in Kidonakis:2006bu (); Kidonakis:2007ej (); Kidonakis:2010tc (), where only large soft and collinear gluon corrections were resummed and the resummed cross section was expanded up to .

In this paper, we use the framework of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) Bauer:2000ew (); Bauer:2000yr (); Bauer:2001ct (); Bauer:2001yt (); Becher:2006nr () to give a resummed cross section of t-channel single top production, which contains all contributions from large logarithms in hard, jet and soft functions to all orders. There is a strong motivation for performing this calculation because the hard functions of this process, compared with soft functions, is not small, but refs. Kidonakis:2006bu (); Kidonakis:2007ej (); Kidonakis:2010tc () only resum the soft and jet effects to next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) order, using the traditional method, and leave the hard effects unresummed. In the SCET approach, the different scales in a process can be separated because the soft and collinear degrees can be decoupled by the redefinition of the fields. At each scale, we only need to deal with the relevant degrees of freedom. Their dependencies on the scale are controlled by the renormalization group (RG) equations, and the hard, jet and soft effects can be resummed conveniently.

This paper is organized as follows. In section II, we give the factorization and resummation formalism of this process in momentum space. In section III, each factor in the resummed cross section is calculated. In section IV, we present the numerical results for this process at the Tevatron and LHC, respectively. We conclude in section V.

## Ii Factorization and Resummation Formalism

Following the same factorization formalism as in our previous paper Zhu:2010mr (), the partonic differential cross section of t-channel can be written as

(1) |

with

(2) |

We use the same definitions of all above notations as Zhu:2010mr () and also choose the independent singlet-octet basis in color space used in Zhu:2010mr (). Because of the special color structure of this process at leading order (LO), the hard function matrix elements do not contribute to the cross section except for at the NLO accuracy. In SCET, there is a RG evolution factor connecting the hard scale and the final common scale , which would contain contributions from non-diagonal elements in its anomalous dimension matrix. However, these contributions are so small, as we saw in ref. Zhu:2010mr (), that we can neglect them. Therefore, we can consider this channel as a double deep-inelastic-scattering (DDIS) process Harris:2002md () and assume that the hard function can be factorized into two parts, i.e. and , which represent corrections from the up fermion line and down fermion line in the Feynman diagram 1, respectively. And eq. (1) can be simplified to

(3) |

## Iii The Hard, Jet and Soft Functions at NLO

At the NNLL accuracy, we need the explicit expressions of hard, jet and soft functions up to NLO in perturbation theory. In this section, we show the calculations of them.

### iii.1 Hard functions

The hard functions are the absolute square of the Wilson coefficients of the operators, which can be obtained by matching the full theory onto SCET. In practice, we need to calculate the one-loop on-shell Feynman diagrams of this process in both the full theory and SCET. In dimensional regularization(DR), the facts that the IR structure of the full theory and the effective theory is identical and the on-shell integrals are scaleless and vanish in SCET imply that the IR divergence of the full theory is just the negative of the UV divergence of SCET. After calculating the one-loop on-shell Feynman diagrams, we get the hard functions at NLO are as follows:

(4) | |||||

(5) |

with

(6) | |||||

(7) | |||||

where . The hard functions have a well behaved expansion in powers of the coupling constant, if and are taken to be of order the natural scales, and , respectively. From eqs.(4, 5), we can write the RG equations of hard functions as

(8) | |||||

(9) |

where is related to the cusp anomalous dimension of Wilson loops with light-like segments Korchemskaya1992169 (), while and accounts for single-logarithmic evolution. Their expressions are shown in appendix A.

After solving the RG equations, we get the hard functions at an arbitrary scale :

(10) | |||||

(11) |

where and are defined as Becher:2006mr ()

(12) | |||||

(13) |

and similarly for , and .

### iii.2 Jet function

The jet function is defined as Bauer:2008jx ()

(14) |

The RG evolution of the jet function is given by Becher:2006mr ()

(15) |

To solve this integro-differential evolution equation, we use the Laplace transformed jet function:

(16) |

which satisfies the the RG equation

(17) |

Then the jet function at an arbitrary scale is given by

(18) |

where . The Laplace transformed jet function at NLO is

(19) |

where .

### iii.3 Soft function

The soft function , which describe soft interactions between all colored particles, is defined as Bauer:2008jx ()

(20) |

where

(21) |

Here is the time-ordering operator required to ensure the proper ordering of soft gluon fields in the soft Wilson line Chay:2004zn (), which is defined as

(22) |

for incoming Wilson lines, and

(23) |

for out going Wilson lines, respectively.

The soft function can be calculated in SCET or in the full theory in the Eikonal approximation Becher:2009th (). In DR, actually, we only need to calculate the non-vanishing real emission diagrams, as shown in figure 2,

which give

(24) | |||||

and

(25) | |||||

respectively. Evaluating these integrals, we get

(26) |

and

(27) |

respectively, where . The explicit expressions of and are given in appendix B. And the soft function , similar to the jet function, satisfies the RG equation

(28) |

The solution to this equation is

(29) |

where . The Laplace transformed soft function at NLO is given by

(30) |

where .

### iii.4 Final resummed differential cross section

After combining the hard, jet and soft function together, according to eq. (3), we obtain the resummed differential cross section for t-channel single top production

(31) | |||||

where and . In the above expression, we have chosen or to avoid the evolution of the parton distribution functions.

If we set scales , , , equal to the common scale , which is conveniently chosen as the factorization scale , then we recover the threshold singular plus distributions, which should appear in the fixed-order calculation. Up to order , we have

(32) | |||||

where . We find that all and two front singular plus distribution terms coincide with Kidonakis’ Kidonakis:2006bu ().

Including the remaining terms in the NLO result which we do not resum, we obtain the final resummed differential cross section

(33) | |||||

## Iv Numerical Discussion

In this section, we discuss the numerical results of threshold
resummation in t-channel single top production via SCET. In our
calculation, there are four scales, except the two factorization
scales, explicitly, which are
all arbitrary in principle and our final results should not depend
on them. However, because the Wilson coefficients in each matching,
expressed as hard, jet and soft functions, respectively, and the
anomalous dimensions are evaluated in fixed-order perturbation
theory, there are residual dependence on these scales. To
illustrate the reliability of our evaluation, first, we investigate
these scale uncertainties. In the discussion below, we focus on the
scenario at the Tevatron and give a cut to
^{2}^{2}2For s-channel processes, the invariant
mass of final state particles provides a natural cut to the transfer
momentum ., which is the transfer momentum of this process,
because, based on the view point of effective theory, only processes
of large transfer momentum are considered as hard processes with
which we are concerned.

### iv.1 Scale choices and uncertainties

First, we discuss the dependence of on . From eq.(4), in order to avoid large logarithms, we choose as our natural hard(up) scale. The left curves in figure 3 illustrate the RG effects reduce the dependence of on . And the correction induced by the RG-improved to the LO cross section is about , which is significant.

The right curves in figure 3 show the RG effects reduce the dependence of on , where we choose as our natural hard(down) scale. From these curves, we can see that the scale dependence is reduced and its RG-improved correction to LO cross section is about .

Then, we examine the dependence of jet function on . Unlike the case of hard functions, because we perform the integration convoluting the jet and soft functions analytically, we can only choose the natural jet scale through the numerical results. In figure 4, we show that the natural jet scale is about GeV around which the contribution of the fixed order jet function is minimal. Besides, the RG-improved jet function vary slowly, which indicates that the scale dependence is significantly reduced. The correction induced by the RG-improved jet function to the LO cross section is about .

The same case happens in the soft function. In principle, we may consider as the natural soft scale. But, in practice, from the numerical results in figure 4, we set the natural soft scale at GeV, and find that the correction induced by the RG-improved soft function to the LO cross section is about .

### iv.2 Resummed cross sections

We have chosen all the natural scales needed in this process. Now we give the numerical results of the resummed cross section. When discussing each scale dependence, we fixed the other scales at the natural scales chosen in the last subsection.

& | |||
---|---|---|---|

(pb) | |||

(pb) | |||

(pb) |

In table 1, we vary the factorization scales over the ranges . And table 1 shows that the resummation effects decrease the NLO cross section by about . This is reasonable because we have seen above that the virtual effects are negative, and their absolute values are larger than those of jet and soft effects. These effects, when resummed to all order, would contribute large negative corrections which even overwhelm the positive jet and soft contributions. As a result, the resummed cross section is less than the LO order if the same parton distribution functions are applied, just as we did in this work. From table 1 we also can see the factorization scale dependence of resummed cross sections is reduced when the two factorization scales vary simultaneously, compared with NLO cross sections. But, if the factorization scales vary separately, the scale dependence get worse, thought still better than that of LO cross sections.

In table 2, we show scale dependencies of the resummed cross section, where the scales vary over the ranges , , and . And we can see that their uncertainties are all very small.

(pb) |
---|

In table 3, we show how the value of affects our results. When the value of varies from GeV to GeV, the resummed cross sections vary by about .

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

(pb) | 1.032 | 1.013 | 0.995 | 0.977 | 0.959 |

(pb) | 1.037 | 1.026 | 1.010 | 0.987 | 0.977 |

(pb) | 1.008 | 0.997 | 0.982 | 0.959 | 0.948 |

Table 4 gives the transfer momentum cut dependence of the cross sections. It shows that the resummed cross section gets smaller when the transfer momentum cut is decreased since choosing a smaller transfer momentum cut means that more hard effects are resummed. But as mentioned above, the transfer momentum cut can not be chosen too small for a hard process. Therefore, we choose GeV as the natural transfer momentum cut in the numerical calculations.

(GeV) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

(pb) | 0.920 | 0.936 | 0.948 | 0.957 | 0.964 |

In tables 7, 7, 7, 10, 10, and 10, we present the results for the single top (antitop) production at the LHC for different top quark mass with TeV, respectively. We can see that the resummation effects decrease the NLO cross sections by about when the transfer momentum cut is chosen as GeV. And the factorization scale dependencies of the cross section are reduced also.

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |

(pb) | |||||

(pb) | |||||

(pb) |

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |

(pb) | |||||

(pb) | |||||

(pb) |

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |

(pb) | |||||

(pb) | |||||

(pb) |

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |

(pb) | |||||

(pb) | |||||

(pb) |

(GeV) | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | |

(pb) | |||||

(pb) |