Experimental investigation of transitional flow in a toroidal pipe

Experimental investigation of transitional flow in a toroidal pipe

Abstract

The flow instability and further transition to turbulence in a toroidal pipe (torus) with curvature (tube-to-coiling diameter) 0.049 is investigated experimentally. The flow inside the toroidal pipe is driven by a steel sphere fitted to the inner pipe diameter. The sphere is moved with constant azimuthal velocity from outside the torus by a moving magnet. The experiment is designed to investigate curved pipe flow by optical measurement techniques. Using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry, laser Doppler velocimetry and pressure drop measurements the flow is measured for Reynolds numbers ranging from 1000 to 15 000. Time- and space-resolved velocity fields are obtained and analyzed. The steady axisymmetric basic flow is strongly influenced by centrifugal effects. On an increase of the Reynolds number we find a sequence of bifurcations. For a supercritical bifurcation to an oscillatory flow is found in which waves travel in streamwise direction with a phase velocity slightly faster than the mean flow. The oscillatory flow is superseded by a presumably quasi-periodic flow at a further increase of the Reynolds number before turbulence sets in. The results are found to be compatible, in general, with earlier experimental and numerical investigations on transition to turbulence in helical and curved pipes. However, important aspects of the bifurcation scenario differ considerably.

\checkfont

eurm10 \checkfontmsam10 J. Kühnen, M. Holzner, B. Hof and H. C. Kuhlmann]J.\nsK\lsÜ\lsH\lsN\lsE\lsN\ls1,\nsM.\nsH\lsO\lsL\lsZ\lsN\lsE\lsR\ls, B.\nsH\lsO\lsF\ls, and H.\nsC.\nsK\lsU\lsH\lsL\lsM\lsA\lsN\lsN 2012 \volume650 \pagerange119–126

keywords

1 Introduction

Transition to turbulence in straight circular pipes is one of the oldest and most fundamental problems of fluid mechanics, entailing various fundamental questions about the nature of turbulence (Eckhardt, 2008). The understanding of the physics of transition to turbulence in straight pipes has experienced a significant progress in recent years due to the application of modern optical measurement techniques and computationally-based theoretical modeling (Hof et al., 2004; Eckhardt et al., 2007; Mullin, 2011). It is characteristic for straight pipe flow that transition occurs despite of the linear stability of the laminar Hagen–Poiseuille flow if the flow perturbations exceed a certain threshold. Moreover, and different from plane Poiseuille flow, Rayleigh–-Bénard convection, or Taylor–Couette flow, there exists no instability of Hagen–Poiseuille flow for any Reynolds number where is the mean velocity, the diameter of the tube and the kinematic viscosity of the fluid (Drazin & Reid, 1981). Consequently, turbulence can only be triggered by finite amplitude perturbations. Following Reynolds (1883) the critical point is then defined as the Reynolds number above which turbulence is first sustained indefinitely, whereas below any turbulence initially in the flow will eventually decay. As shown by Avila et al. (2011) this critical Reynolds number is where the decay of turbulence is balanced by a spreading process.

In curved pipes the process of transition to turbulence qualitatively differs from that in straight pipes. Curved-pipe flow has received less attention than straight-pipe flow, even though the former is of no lesser importance: practically all pipes in nature, e.g. blood vessels, or in engineering are curved. In curved pipes the basic flow is strongly affected by an imbalance between the cross-stream pressure gradient and the centrifugal force which leads to a secondary cross-stream motion, typically in form of a pair of steady streamwise Dean vortices symmetric with respect to the tangent plane. With increasing Dean number the maximum of the streamwise velocity is shifted radially towards the outer wall of the pipe. Owing to the increased gradient of the streamwise flow the drag in curved pipes is considerably higher than in straight pipes. For reviews of curved-pipe flow and further reading we refer to Berger et al. (1983); Hüttl & Friedrich (2000, 2001); Naphon & Wongwises (2006); Vashisth et al. (2008).

Dean (1927, 1928) has solved the simplified Navier–Stokes equations for a coiled pipe of small curvature showing that the flow is governed by two parameters. These parameters are the curvature of the pipe diameter to the coiling diameter and the Dean number . Taylor (1929), White (1929) and Adler (1934) found that the flow in curved pipes remains laminar up to Reynolds numbers higher at least by a factor of two than in straight pipes. They also noticed that transition to turbulence is not as abrupt as in straight pipes but occurs gradually, without any discontinuity of the characteristic observables such as the pressure drop. Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) investigated curved-pipe flow for moderate Reynolds numbers. They found that the turbulent flow in a straight pipe becomes laminar after entering a coiled-pipe of the same diameter. They recognized, moreover, that the curved-pipe flow becomes time periodic before turbulence commences. The oscillation amplitude was found to be strongest near the inside wall of the pipe.

Webster & Humphrey (1993) investigated the unsteady three-dimensional flow through a helical pipe at transitional conditions using laser-Doppler velocimetry. For they measured the onset of periodic low-frequency perturbation waves at . They specified the nondimensional frequencies found with and 0.5 for all Reynolds numbers investigated. Complementary numerical simulations for by Webster & Humphrey (1997) were in agreement with the experimental results of Webster & Humphrey (1993). Dye streaks, used for visualization, were found to diffuse at . Webster & Humphrey (1997) interpreted this behavior as the onset of turbulent fluctuations.

Flows in weakly curved ducts with constant curvature and in helical pipes with small torsion have a common asymptotic limit: toroidal-pipe flow. However, the inlet and outlet conditions are generally different. Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) numerically simulated the flow in a circular toroid with a circular cross-section which is driven by a constant streamwise body force, using periodic boundary conditions. For a supercritical Hopf bifurcation was found in the interval , giving rise to an azimuthally traveling wave which took the form of a varicose streamwise modulation of the two Dean vortex rings. The wave was described to mainly affect the Dean vortices but not the boundary layers on the wall. For a secondary Hopf bifurcation was discovered leading to a quasi-periodic flow. The second wave, created for , arises as an array of oblique vortices localized in the two boundary layers of the basic flow at the edge of the Dean vortex regions. The oscillatory perturbation flows in both the periodic and the quasi-periodic regimes were anti-symmetric with respect to the equatorial midplane of the torus for . For Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) found a direct transition from a steady to a quasi-periodic flow between , associated with hysteresis. The traveling waves for were symmetric with respect to the equatorial midplane of the torus.

Like Cioncolini & Santini (2006), most studies on curved-pipe flow aimed at reliable pressure-drop correlations, because the friction factor is an important quantity for industrial design. Moreover, all experimental studies on transition to turbulence in fully developed curved pipes have been conducted in helical pipes with a small pitch. While the closed flow in a torus considered by Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) offers a perfect geometry for theoretical and numerical investigations, experiments using a torus are difficult, because the driving pressure gradient cannot as easily be imposed as in open systems. Apart from Madden & Mullin (1994), del Pino et al. (2008) and Hewitt et al. (2011), who experimentally studied the transient flow in a torus during spin-up from rest and spin-down from solid-body rotation, we are not aware of any other experimental work on the flow in a torus.

In the present work we experimentally investigate the flow and its instability in a torus by means of visual observations, high-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (SPIV) and pressure drop measurements. Particular attention is paid to the detection and investigation of traveling waves. To that end an experiment was set up where the flow inside a torus is driven by a moving sphere. For a sufficiently large aspect ratio (circumference-to-pipe-diameter ratio) the perturbations induced by the sphere remain localized and bulk flow properties can be measured which are independent of the particular driving. We measure the full three-dimensional and time-resolved structure of the transitional flow including all three velocity-components over the entire length and cross-section of the pipe.

2 Experimental setup

2.1 The facility

The toroidal pipe is realized as a toroidal cavity (torus) in a stationary block of plexiglas. A ferromagnetic sphere, which is actuated by a strong magnet from the outside, is put into the toroidal cavity to drive the flow in the cavity. The main components and the driving mechanism of the experiment are sketched in figure 1. The stationary block of plexiglas is built of two disks of highly transparent and polished perspex into which a concentric notch of semi-circular cross sections had been machined. The two disks are mounted mirror-symmetrically. The two notches in the disks hence form a closed toroidal cavity, i.e. a curved tube which is to be filled with the working fluid. To drive the fluid motion a ferromagnetic stainless chromium steel sphere with diameter slightly less than the toroidal tube is placed in the toroid. The steel sphere is actuated from outside the toroidal cavity using a strong permanent magnet mounted on a rotating boom. To achieve a constant and precisely adjustable flow rate in the torus the boom is rotated at a constant angular velocity, thereby steadily moving the sphere inside the torus, driving the fluid motion. The driving system to rotate the shaft consists of an electric gear motor combined with a belt drive (both not shown in figure 1). The Reynolds number is defined as , where is the diameter of the tube, the kinematic viscosity of the fluid, and the bulk velocity with angular velocity of the rotating boom and the diameter of the centre circle of the torus.

Figure 1: Assembly drawing (side view) of the experimental setup. Lower (1) and upper (2) plexiglass disk are bolted (3) and sealed using a 2.5 mm rubber O-ring (4) in a 2.2  x 2.5 mm notch. A total of 32 (16 outside and 16 within the torus-notch, in an angular distance of ) screws is used to ensure leakproof tightness. A flat pot magnet (5) with threaded stem is incorporated to the boom (6) right below the centerline of the tube, leaving an adjustable distance of 1 mm to the lower plexiglass disk. The boom is rotated around the shaft (7) by a geared direct current motor (not shown). The diameter of the torus is  mm, the diameter of the tube is  mm. Drawing not to scale.

When measuring flow details with SPIV a large tube diameter is desirable. Therefore, a tube diameter of  mm was chosen, slightly larger than the diameter of the sphere  mm, to permit rolling motion of the sphere. This left a small sickle-shaped gap of maximum  mm at the upper half between torus wall and sphere. The total area of the gap is  mm corresponding to 1.9% of the tube’s cross section. Through the gap between sphere and tube wall a small leak flow will arise. When the fluid in the torus has reached a constant velocity after spin up from rest the sphere has to balance just the minor friction losses in the tube which amounted to, e.g.  Pa at .

Being interested in a small curvature a large diameter of the torus is preferable. We used a centerline diameter of  mm, resulting in a curvature . This corresponds to a large aspect ratio (circumference to tube diameter) of . To achieve a surface finish of the tube comparable to that of glass pipes the perspex surface was polished. The torus dimensions including the manufacturing tolerances are  mm and  mm, respectively.

According to the manufacturer’s specification the pot magnet had  N adhesive force perpendicular to the surface to which the magnet should stick (equivalent to 22 kg bearing capacity). However, the actual adhesive force decreases quickly with increasing distance and is also influenced by the alloy of the object of magnetic attraction. Since the minimum distance between magnet and sphere in the setup is  mm (see fig.1), the actual adhesive force imposed on the sphere is about 0.49 to 0.98 N (0.05 to 0.1 kg) according to specification. This was found sufficient to control the sphere in the liquid-filled torus. Owing to the high inertia of the rolling sphere compared to any forces caused by the flow fluctuations the sphere would always roll very smoothly and accurately follow the magnet. Observations of the sphere by a camera mounted on the boom did not allow to detect any relative motion between the sphere and the magnet, once the steady rolling motion was established. Only in the case of very fast or jerky acceleration or deceleration the sphere would not follow the magnet and loose the magnetic bond.

To detect the temperature of the fluid in the torus, two small Platinum SMD Flat Chip temperature sensors (Vishay Beyschlag, PTS 0603, ) are used. Every sensor is mounted on the front end of a bracket pin with a diameter of 2 mm. The bracket pins are plugged in holes which were drilled into the upper plexiglas disk in an angular distance of , just above the upper apex of the tube. The holes would just not shove through into the toroidal volume but leave a thin indentation of approximately 0.08 mm between the temperature sensors and the fluid in the torus. For data acquisition the two sensors are connected to a Validyne UPC 2100 PCI sensor interface card. The mean value of the two sensor signals, averaged over 20 s, is used to determine the temperature of the fluid in the torus with an accuracy of  K. The ambient temperature in the laboratory could vary slowly by approximately  K during a day. As individual measurements would never take longer than 5 minutes no additional measures were taken to control the temperature of the fluid. To eliminate problems due to the differing refractive indices such as unwanted displacement, hidden regions and multiple images (Lowe & Kutt, 1992), arising for objects placed inside containers with cylindrical walls, a refractive-index-matched mixture of distilled water and ammonium thiocyanate was used as working fluid (Budwig, 1994; Hopkins et al., 2000). The kinematic viscosity of the index-matched fluid as a function of temperature was determined by means of a Schott Cannon-Fenske capillary viscometer. For temperatures ranging from 20 to 30 C the kinematic viscosity of the index-matched fluid was approximated by the fourth-order polynomial

(1)

which was fitted to the measured data by least squares. Here, is measured in degrees Celsius and in m/s. A combination of a LabView-program and a system consisting of controller unit (LSC 30/2, 4-Q-DC, maxon motor ag), USB data acquisition card (National Instruments 6008) and direct current motor (RE 25, maxon motor ag) with speedometer (DCT 22) and planetary gear (GP 32) was used to set and continually control the Reynolds number. The LabView-program contained the functional relationship between temperature, viscosity and the geometrical data based on which the required angular velocity of the sphere for a specified Reynolds number was calculated and implemented. Optionally, an automatic mode can be used to increase or decrease the Reynolds number stepwise by predefined step sizes and at predefined times. The setup provided the possibility to investigate the flow in the torus for adjustable Reynolds numbers ranging from 1 000 to 15 000 with an accuracy of % taking into account the leak flow past the sphere (see 3.1.3).

2.2 Measurements

For preliminary investigations and visual identification of pertinent flow structures, the fluid was seeded with glitter particles (polyester glitter, Sigmund Lindner GmbH) which reflect the light and visualize the flow structure. However, the conspicuity was limited, because the particles tended to get stuck in the gap between sphere and torus wall and would hence block the sphere if their concentration was too high. Therefore, only a limited amount of particles could be used. Still photographs as well as video recordings were made with a Nikon D 7000 DSLR camera. Movies of the flow structures were recorded with a frame size of pixels at 24 fps. For the video recordings the camera was mounted on an additional boom which rotated at the same speed as the boom driving the sphere. This allowed observations in the frame of reference rotating with the angular velocity of the sphere which nearly equals the mean flow velocity .

The pressure drop between two pressure holes (bore holes with internal diameter of 1 mm) was determined using a differential pressure sensor (Validyne DP103, ultra low range wet-wet differential pressure transducer). The pressure transducer was calibrated using a Betz manometer and it had a full range of 140 Pa with an accuracy better than 0.35 Pa. The pressure holes were located at the top of the upper side of the tube. The sampling rate was 10 ms.

Figure 2: Sketch (side view) of the stereoscopic PIV system. To reduce optical reflections, a prism is placed on the upper plexiglas disk of the torus. (1) lower plexiglass disk, (2) upper plexiglass disk, (3) screws, (4) prism, (5) light sheet, (6) cameras. A few drops of glycerine were used to create a thin film between (2) and (4), enabling seamless contact. Drawing not to scale.

A SPIV system from LaVision has been used to measure the three components of the velocity vectors over a cross section perpendicular to the flow. It consisted of a pulsed Quantronix Darwin Duo laser (diode pumped Nd:YLF laser, wavelength 527 nm, 60 mJ total energy) and two Phantom V10 high-speed cameras with a full resolution of  px. The temporal resolution was set to 100 Hz. Silver-coated hollow glass spheres (S-HGS-10, mean diameter 10 m,  g/cm, Dantec Dynamics) were used as seeding particles.

Previous investigators (see e.g. van Doorne & Westerweel, 2007) have demonstrated the possibilities and potential of SPIV to investigate and capture the appearance and development of transitional flow in a pipe. The same principle is applied in the experimental setup used for this work. Figure 2 provides a sketch of the setup which was used for stereoscopic PIV, showing the arrangement of plexiglass disks, light sheet and 2 cameras in a 45 viewing angle. Due to the 45 viewing angle the light would be refracted at the outer wall of the plexiglass plate, which would reduce the effective viewing angle of the cameras and degrade the image quality. Therefore, a prism made of perspex is attached to the upper plexiglass plate such that the optical axis is perpendicular to air–perspex interface.

The calibration target, needed for the calibration of the SPIV measurements, was custom made by Die Signmaker GmbH (Göttingen). It consisted of 5 mm–spaced lattice of black dots with a diameter of 1 mm printed on both sides of a 1.5 mm perspex disk with a cross-sectional diameter of 30 mm, i.e. slightly less than the tube diameter. The disk was kept in position (congruent with the light sheet of the laser) for the calibration procedure by a tiny locking screw drilled into the torus wall. After the calibration images were shot the screw was removed and the calibration target was released. The experimental setup was too sensitive to be disassembled after calibration, as dismantling and repeated assembly would have caused small displacements and hence spoiled the calibration. Therefore, the disk was just left in the torus and went with the flow. After a few turns of the actuator the disk would then be located in front of the sphere, not perturbing or changing the flow far from the sphere in addition to the perturbations induced by the actuator itself.

The evaluation of the 3D-vector fields from the PIV images was performed with commercial PIV-software (DaVis 8, LaVision). The interrogation area was  px with an overlap of 50%. The maximum particle displacement between two frames was approximately 11 px in horizontal and 8 px in vertical direction. Subsequently, the acquired data were analyzed with Mathworks Matlab R2011b which was used as programming environment.

A fibre-flow 2D-LDV system of Dantec Dynamics was employed for laser-Doppler velocimetry measurements. From the LDV data we obtained spectra of the streamwise velocity at single points within the cross section of the pipe. The average sampling rate was 200 Hz.

3 Results

\psfrag

x[bc][bc] \psfragy[bc][bc] \psfragphi[bl][bl] \psfragA[bc][bc]A \psfragB[bc][bc]B \psfragC[bc][bc]C \psfragD[bc][bc]D \psfraghs[bc][bc]hs \psfragls[bc][bc]ls \psfragcore[br][br]core \psfragregion I[bc][bc]region I \psfragCSWL[br][br] cross-stream wall layer \psfragoec[tr][tr]outer equatorial point \psfragiec[tl][tl]inner equatorial point

Figure 3: Salient flow structures in a cross section of the toroidal pipe and notation. A cartesian () coordinate system is used in the meridional observation plane at constant toroidal angle . The poloidal (meridional) angle is . The -axis is directed toward the symmetry axis of the torus. The symbols hs and ls denote regions of high-speed and low-speed streamwise velocity, respectively. A,B,C and D denote the north-pole (B), south-pole (D), outer equatorial (C) and inner equatorial (A) points.

Most of the space-resolved measurements are taken in a meridional cross section of the torus. Therefore, we use local Cartesian coordinates () as shown in figure 3, where are the respective Cartesian velocity components. The -axis is directed radially inward towards the center of the torus. Figure 3 also sketches characteristic cross-stream flow structures of the basic steady flow, where we use the same notation as Webster & Humphrey (1997). The steady basic flow is mirror symmetric with respect to the equatorial plane . In a wide core region around the axis the cross-stream flow is directed radially outward in negative -direction from the low-speed core region (ls) to the high-speed core region (hs) of the streamwise velocity. The cross-stream flow returns radially inward in two symmetrically located wall jets called cross-stream wall layers. The thickness of these wall jets grows as they turn inward. Before reaching the inner equatorial point C the jets turn sharply in region I and merge to form the core flow in the low-speed region directed radially outward.

3.1 Evaluation of the experimental setup

We are interested in the toroidal pipe flow driven by a prescribed steady volume flux. Due to the particular driving by a moving sphere the ideal flow is perturbed in the vicinity of the sphere. To assess to which extent the flow field in the torus can be considered fully developed, i.e. stationary and independent of the driving mechanism, the effect of the rolling sphere on the flow has to be evaluated. The perturbations arise in form of an entrance-length effect and a leakage through the gap between the sphere and the torus. As the curvature is constant throughout this work, the strength of the flow is measured using the Reynolds number instead of the Dean number.

Entrance-length effect

(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4: Time traces of the streamwise velocity at for , and as function of time (bottom axis) and azimuthal length (top axis). A typical PIV-run of 12 s, comprising approximately one full revolution of the sphere, is displayed. The coordinate origin was defined by the transit of the sphere. The vertical dotted lines are drawn with a spacing . The velocities of the sphere are (a), 0.22 (b) and 0.24 [m/s] (c).

If the sphere moved as a plug with constant velocity without rolling a pure streamwise and steady velocity field would be enforced at the surface of the sphere. Due to the imposed velocity on the semi-spherical end wall and the velocity discontinuity along the line of contact, there exists a return flow in the frame of reference moving with the sphere which represents a perturbation to the fully developed toroidal-pipe flow decaying away from the sphere. In operation the sphere is rolling in the torus. While the rolling motion prevents any perturbation of stick–slip type and thus adds to keeping the translational velocity constant, provided the rotation rate of the beam is constant, the rolling motion induces an additional cross-stream velocity component which will also decay away from the sphere under subcritical conditions.

To quantify the decay of the above perturbations we measured the streamwise velocity as function of the distance from the sphere using SPIV. Figure c shows the result as function of time (related to the distance from the sphere by ) for , and in the center of region I at the point . This point has been selected, because the flow instability can be measured sensitively in this region. Shown is a period of 12 s, equivalent to approximately one full revolution of the sphere around the torus. At (figure ca) the flow is fully developed, except for the immediate vicinity of the sphere where the streamwise velocity component varies strongly. In some distance from the sphere the measured velocity is constant up to small fluctuations which are mainly due to the noise of the PIV data. Excluding the range disturbed by the sphere, the RMS value of the streamwise velocity is of the mean value.

At (figure cb) a very distinct sinusoidal modulation of the streamwise velocity is observed which differs markedly from the signature of the wake flow. With the center of the sphere at the oscillation amplitude is nearly constant in a certain region around . To analyze the oscillatory flow in the bulk we consider only a time interval of 2.25 s corresponding to 0.5 m or which leaves a sufficient safety margin from the region disturbed by the sphere. This range is marked as analyzed in figure cb and it is typically located on the side of the torus opposite to the sphere. At a dominant frequency can still be recognized, but the amplitude is no longer constant.

To confirm that the perturbations induced by the rolling sphere are spatially restricted we consider the kinetic energy. Decomposing the velocity field into a temporal mean and a fluctuation part we define the streamwise and cross-stream fluctuation energies and , respectively, where the brackets indicate averaging over the -plane. Figure 5 shows that the range of perturbed flow is confined to the vicinity of the sphere as indicated by the arrows, while further away from the sphere the kinetic energy of the fluctuations is nearly constant and very small. For the flow is perturbed for  s during passage of the sphere, corresponding to an azimuthal angle of slightly asymmetric about the location of the sphere.

Figure 5: Transit of the sphere through the measurement plane for . The spatially averaged (over and ) kinetic energy of the velocity fluctuations is displayed the direct vicinity of the sphere. Shown are the streamwise , the cross-stream and the total fluctuation energies .

It is concluded that there exists a range of fully developed flow which is nearly unperturbed by the details of the flow around the rolling sphere.

As the Reynolds number increases the unperturbed range decreases. Based on an extrapolation of the measured length of the zone disturbed by the sphere at low and moderate Reynolds numbers the length of the zone of the nearly fully-developed bulk flow for is at least of one full revolution of the torus. This range is predicted at relative to the sphere at . Even though the lengths of the wakes upstream and downstream from the sphere differ, we selected a symmetric region for simplicity, leaving a sufficient safety margin to the perturbed regions. All data analyzed were taken from these unperturbed angular sections.

Plunger with sphere

To assess the effect of the rolling of the sphere on the end-wall-induced perturbations and possibly on the bulk flow the driving was modified. Instead of a sole sphere a plunger was used made from polyoxymethylene (POM) (Figure 6). The plunger was machined in form of a slightly modified cylindrical block with a diameter of 30.1 mm by which the total area of the gap was reduced to 9.49 mm or % of the tube’s cross section.

A bore of 20 mm diameter was drilled into the plunger, providing space for a steel sphere with 18 mm diameter. This steel sphere was also controlled by the magnet from outside, but its rolling motion would not influence the flow in the torus. As the plunger was cylindrical, its shape did not perfectly match the slightly curved torus. Due to the lubrication of the fluid between the two solid surfaces of tube and plunger, the plunger would slide through the tube very well without excessive stresses or seizures at the wall. Only very mild wear, mostly originating from the tracer particles in the fluid, was noticed.

We found that the design type of the actuator had very little influence on the length of the perturbation flow near the moving end wall and no influence on the bulk flow. For that reason only a rolling sphere was used for all measurements.

Figure 6: Sketch of the first type of plunger within the torus. A small sphere of mm placed inside the plunger is used as object of magnetic attraction to move it. Only the streamwise moving walls of the plunger, instead of the surface of the rolling sphere, interact with the flow in the torus.

Leak flow past the sphere

The azimuthal velocity of the center of the sphere is precisely known as it is controlled by the angular velocity of the rotating boom. Comparing the associated flow rate with the measured flow rate allows to determine the leak flow past the sphere. The actual mean velocity in the torus was determined in two ways. First, the pressure drop over the angle was measured. The result was compared to pressure-drop data obtained from published correlations of White (1929); Hasson (1955); Mishra & Gupta (1979) for the laminar regime, which all deviate less than 1.5%. Up to we find excellent qualitative agreement with these correlations but a practically constant deviation which can be attributed to a slightly slower velocity of the fluid than the azimuthal velocity of the sphere by %. In addition, was obtained from SPIV-measurements. The resulting leak flux amounted to % of the actual mean volume flux, consistent with the flow rate from the pressure drop. Therefore, we can safely determine the mean velocity as . It must be noted, however, that a slightly non-linear behavior of the leak flow for increasing Reynolds number could not be ruled out.

3.2 Velocity-field measurements

Steady basic flow

Figure 7: Entire cross-sectional flow field of the tube in the steady laminar regime (at ). Streamwise (color contours) and in-plane velocity (vectors), both normalized with the mean streamwise velocity . To eliminate measurement noise, the flow field is an average of 400 PIV-images.

In the following the flow field in the bulk is considered which is practically unaffected by the end-wall perturbations. For small Reynolds numbers the flow field is unique and steady. For the steady basic flow has developed its characteristic structure which is caused by the pipe curvature. The velocity field measured by SPIV in the entire cross-section is shown in figure 7. As the fluid in the core region is centrifugally driven toward the outer wall, the maximum streamwise velocity is located in the plane of symmetry and near the outer wall. Therefore, the gradient of the streamwise velocity component is very high near the outer wall. As a result of the secondary, radial outward motion in a wide range about the symmetry plane and due to continuity, fluid with high streamwise momentum is transported radially inward along very thin cross-stream wall layers. This is visible from the cross-stream velocity component and the elongated contour shapes of the streamwise velocity. As the wall jets evolve radially inward they widen. At approximately the jets turn and merge with the broad radially outward stream, without separating from the wall. The two symmetrically located turning regions of the secondary flow, denoted region I, represent the vortex cores of the two Dean vortices.

The stationary waviness of the radial outward cross-stream flow near the equatorial line in figure 7 indicates a weak symmetry breaking. It could not be determined conclusively whether the small loss of symmetry is due to the flow physics or due to systematic measurement errors. Possible sources of error are the symmetry breaking by the rolling of the sphere and an imperfect calibration due to the custom made calibration target (see sec. 2.2). However, since the cross-stream velocity is about one order of magnitude smaller than the streamwise velocity it is evident that the deviation from perfect symmetry is diminutive.

Figure 8 shows profiles along the vertical of the streamwise velocity and the absolute value of the cross-stream velocity ( for ) for . The wall layers are clearly visible with global maxima of the absolute value of the cross-stream velocity at in a distance of from each wall. The two other maxima of the absolute value of the cross-stream velocity at mark the edge of the cross-stream return flow in the interior. Between these extrema of the streamwise velocity reaches its extrema at before dropping sharply towards the wall. The boundary layers become thinner with increasing Reynolds number and/or curvature of the pipe (see also Webster & Humphrey, 1997).

Figure 8: Vertical profiles of the streamwise () and in-plane () velocity magnitudes for . Velocities not to scale.

Mean-velocity profiles for increasing Reynolds number

For higher Reynolds numbers the basic flow becomes unstable and time-dependent. To characterize the flow in a wide range of Reynolds numbers we consider the time-averaged streamwise velocity in the two orthogonal planes and . Figure 9 shows the profiles (denoted by h for horizontal) and (denoted by v for vertical) for various Reynolds numbers. Characteristic for curved-pipe flow are the flat vertical profiles and the nearly linear variation of the horizontal profiles. As the Reynolds number increases the boundary layers become thinner, associated with increasing strain rates at the walls. Moreover, the slope of the horizontal velocity profiles becomes smaller, associated with a reduction of the velocity extrema which is most significant for . It is remarkable that the horizontal profiles of the mean velocity do not change very much between and , even though the flow for is strongly time-dependent. In addition to the profiles of the mean streamwise velocity along and , (denoted by v) is shown. As can be seen, the mean velocity profiles along (v) do experience a change between and . This change is related to the the onset of oscillatory flow whose amplitude is largest near the maxima of along .

3.3 Primary instability: The onset of time-dependence

Figure 9: Horizontal (h) and vertical (v) profiles of the mean streamwise velocity at and , respectively, for different Reynolds numbers. v denotes vertical profiles along .

Figure 10: Still picture from a movie (see mov-Re4350.1turn.avi) of a short section of the torus from above at . The camera was following the flow with the velocity of the sphere .

When the Reynolds number is increased the steady basic flow becomes unstable and time-dependence sets in at . The supercritical flow arises as a wave which travels downstream with a phase velocity which is slightly larger than the mean flow. With increasing Reynolds number the amplitude grows continuously from zero at the threshold. Figure 10 shows a short section () of the torus at . The wavelength is indicated by arrows. The wave can be recognized much better in the short movie mov-Re4350.1turn.avi (supporting material, online) than in the image.

Figure 11: Contours of the (instantaneous) streamwise velocity over one wavelength at in increments of . a) , b) , c) and d) . The level of and is indicated for reference.

Figure 12: Fluctuating velocities over one wavelength at . Vector field of the cross-stream velocity fluctuations and contours of the streamwise velocity fluctuations, both normalized with the bulk velocity . For the sake of clearer representation is displayed only for to in increments of 0.004. The maximum levels would be .

From visual observations the wavelength of the finite-amplitude wave in terms of the arclength along the center of the pipe can be estimated as for . In the range of the wave is almost stationary in a frame of reference moving with the sphere. The wave celerity is about 10% higher than the mean velocity. For the strict periodicity of the wave is lost and the peak-to-peak distance of the disturbed wave is varying between . Moreover, for Reynolds numbers the wavy motion is interrupted by short irregular bursts. For even higher Reynolds numbers, , no dominant period can be detected by visual observation.

At the finite-amplitude wave is already well established. Figure 11 shows the streamwise velocity in the -plane at four instants during one period. Each image is obtained from averaging eight successive periods. The oscillation amplitude of the cross-stream velocity is very small (not shown). The fully time-resolved oscillatory flow is shown in Re4300.timeresvelfield.gif (supporting material, online). The oscillations are most pronounced in the vicinity of the contour level , in particular in region I (see figure 3). During the oscillation the finger of high streamwise momentum in region I is oscillating back and forth in meridional direction (parallel to the wall). When the fingers elongate towards point at the inner wall, the radially stratified streamwise momentum in the center of the pipe moves towards point on the outer wall, the shift however being smaller, and vice versa.

(a) View from the inside of the bend
(b) View from the outside of the bend
Figure 13: Isosurfaces of streamwise velocity oscillations (streaks) at for shown over one wavelength . Two views from opposing sides (I denotes inner wall, O outer wall) are shown. The flow is from left to right. Blue indicates a negative, light gray indicates a positive streamwise velocity perturbation. The images have been averaged of eight periods. For reasons of representation, the velocity field is mapped to a straight pipe.

Figure 12 shows the vector field of the cross-stream velocity fluctuations and selected contour lines of the streamwise velocity fluctuations at eight instants during one period (see also Re4300.fluctvelocity.gif in the supporting material, online). Each image is obtained from averaging 8 periods of oscillation. Despite of the slight asymmetry of the basic flow the oscillations (deviations from the temporal mean) are symmetric with respect to the horizontal plane. The magnitudes of the velocity oscillations in the streamwise and the cross-stream directions are of the order of and , respectively. The cross-stream velocity field in (a) consists of a radial outward flow from the center (labeled 5) of the pipe in the right half of the cross section. The radially outward flow at towards and across region I is particularly strong (point 2). Near point 6 at the edge of the cross-stream wall jet at the cross-stream velocity is oriented tangentially in negative -direction. The cross-stream oscillation amplitude is very small in the regions of low and high streamwise basic-state velocity near the equatorial points A and C, respectively. Half a period later (e) the cross-stream-flow field is reversed. These cross-stream velocity perturbations act on the underlying mean streamwise velocity field (basic flow). Owing to the cross-stream gradients of the mean streamwise flow the cross-stream perturbation flow creates the streamwise perturbations (labeled by numbers in figure 12) which can be considered as streaks. The periodic cross-stream velocity acts, in particular, on the fingers of the streamwise mean flow. Since the streamwise mean velocity exhibits a minimum and a maximum along the ray (see figure 11) the radially outward cross-stream perturbation flow along this direction creates three streaks (1,2,3) of alternating sign. During the temporal (or spatial) evolution, the central streak (2) grows while the other streaks move radially inward (3) and outward (1). After streak (2) has grown to a considerable size (figure 12d) it splits and the original streak structure (figure 12a) is recovered in figure 12e, albeit with a different sign. The pair of radially inward moving streaks merge at the equatorial plane (figure 12b–c) and subsequently merge with the two merged streaks (6) which have also moved towards the equatorial plane.

The time- and space-resolved structure of the streamwise velocity fluctuation is shown in figure b for . Isosurfaces at are shown from the inside (a) and from the outside of the bend (b). The streaks, i.e. the regions where the streamwise velocity is lower or higher than the steady laminar value, are shown in blue and light gray, respectively. The mirror symmetry with respect to the equatorial plane is obvious.

Figure 14: Spatial distribution of the amplitude of the fundamental Fourier mode in the streamwise velocity-fluctuation field for measured by PIV. The amplitude is given in arbitrary units.

The spatial distribution of the fundamental Fourier mode with frequency is shown in figure 14 for the streamwise velocity fluctuations . The fundamental mode is dominating at and the corresponding streamwise velocity fluctuation is sharply peaked at . Near the center another region of streamwise velocity perturbation is found which is quite wide, but with smaller amplitude. The streamwise velocity fluctuation is practically absent in the low-speed core region and in the cross-stream wall layers. This result underlines the importance of region I for the instability, consistent with the observation of Webster & Humphrey (1997) who, likewise, found a maximum oscillation amplitude in this region of the flow.

The absolute maximum of the velocity perturbation in region I provides the best signal-to-noise ratio for measuring the streamwise velocity. Since the location of the maximum was nearly independent of the Reynolds number, the position was selected for LDV measurements. The measured streamwise velocity perturbation was Fourier analyzed for different Reynolds numbers. Figure d shows spectra at four different Reynolds numbers obtained from the range ( corresponds to the location of the sphere) during a single revolution of the sphere. The dimensionless frequency (Strouhal number) is obtained as , where is the frequency in Hz. At (a) a fundamental frequency and its weak second harmonic frequency is clearly resolved. At (b) and (c) the same fundamental frequency is still dominant, but its amplitude is less than for . Furthermore, additional frequencies in the vicinity of can be detected. At (d) no additional frequencies apart from and its higher harmonics can be resolved.

The spectrum for (figure da) is reproducible for each revolution of the sphere and it is characteristic for the range . The amplitudes differ slightly from revolution to revolution. The dominant frequency , however, remained constant. For cases (b), (c) and (d) the measured spectra varied distinctly from revolution to revolution (not shown).

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 15: Spectra of measured by LDV at obtained from during a single revolution of the sphere. Shown are the Fourier amplitudes of the streamwise fluctuations normalized with the mean velocity in the torus, i.e. .

The first occurrence of within the velocity spectrum indicates the first critical Reynolds number. The dependence of the amplitude on the Reynolds number is indicative of supercritical bifurcation. To reduce the deviations among the results obtained from different revolutions, the angular range was Fourier analyzed and the result averaged over five revolutions of the sphere for each Reynolds number. The result is shown in figure 16. The error bar indicates the maximum deviation of an individual amplitude from the mean value. Up to the measured data can be fitted to a square-root law (black dashed line)

(2)

with and . The amplitude of the second harmonic is also shown. This supercritical bifurcation for is in contrast to the subcritical bifurcation for found by Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) numerically in the periodic torus.

Figure 17 displays and in the range . The fundamental frequency (black squares) decreases slightly with the Reynolds number and can be fitted to a linear curve (black dashed line in figure 17)

(3)

Up to the measurement error this behavior is also satisfied by the second harmonic frequency . Apart from and no further dominant frequencies are found in the velocity spectra in the range . However, the fundamental frequency can be traced to much higher Reynolds numbers into the regime of more complex flows in which periodicity in the bulk is lost.

Figure 16: Normalized amplitude of the dominant frequency (squares) and its harmonic (dots) for increasing Reynolds number. Error bars represent the maximum deviation of the measured amplitude for single revolutions. The dashed and dotted lines represent square-root and linear approximations, respectively.

Figure 17: Strouhal number (black squares) and its harmonic (red dots) as functions of the Reynolds number. Linear fits are indicated as dashed lines.

3.4 Beyond the first instability

The Hopf instability at is breaking the continuous rotational invariance with respect to while preserving the mirror symmetry with respect to the equatorial plane. The deviation of from the square root law in figure 16 suggests that a secondary bifurcation occurs near . Around this Reynolds number the peak-to-peak distance of the flow oscillations was visually observed to start varying between approximately and , indicating a loss of simple periodicity. The widening of the spectrum near in figure d b and c indicates that a further bifurcation to a state with two possibly incommensurate frequencies and takes place. The second frequency is conjectured to exhibit a value below . Despite of careful investigation of the velocity spectra could not be pinpointed as every revolution of the sphere yielded different spectra.

Characteristic of the conjectured second instability is a breakdown of the mirror symmetry with respect to the equatorial plane. This is confirmed in figure 18 which displays instantaneous flow fields at . The symmetric oscillations seem to ’break down’ from time to time and, associated with the break down, the symmetry with respect to the equatorial plane is lost temporarily. The asymmetry is observed in the interior as well as in the wall layer. The asymmetry in the interior arises in form of a non-zero velocity component along the axis in the outer half of the pipe and visible interior vortex structures for which are asymmetric with respect to .

Figure 18: Cross sectional flow field for at different moments of time (same as in fig. 19): (a), (b) and (c). Note the small-scale vortex in the wall layer as well as the flow asymmetry in the interior.

Figure 19: Time traces for of the streamwise velocity during four seconds (corresponding to % of one full revolution of the sphere or the range . Signals are shown for five locations to as explained in the text.

The equatorial symmetry is lost due to small-scale flow structures in the wall layers near the equatorial plane and also by interior-flow structures. The small-scale vortices arise spontaneously in the wall layer. One example is shown in figure 18 a. A low-velocity streak is deforming the isolines of the streamwise flow in the wall layer just below the -axis near point C. Such a streak is usually caused by a pair of cross-stream vortices (only one of which can be identified in the total flow in figure 18 a). The structure is visible for a short period of time of about 0.2 s. Immediately after vanishing the same structure appears for the same short period of time in mirror symmetrical location in the upper half of the torus (figure 18 b). In addition to these localized structures which seem to arise erratically, we find asymmetric flows in the interior which seem to be related to the underlying symmetric oscillations with frequency . From time to time interior vortices are created in the cross-stream flow in the outer half of the torus (). An example is shown in figure 18 c. The asymmetric interior-flow structures do not seem to be related to the small-scale vortices in the wall layer, but both can be observed for . Owing to the limited observation time we were not able to exactly pinpoint a critical Reynolds number for the symmetry breaking.

(a)
(b)
Figure 20: Time traces of the streamwise velocity during 3 seconds (corresponding to % of one full revolution for (a) and % for (b) respectively) at (a) and (b) for 5 different points within the cross section. as in figure 19.

In order to further characterize the temporal and spatial behavior of the flow beyond the second instability figure 19 displays the streamwise velocity during a period of four seconds for corresponding to the azimuthal range . Signals shown are obtained from three locations in the mid-plane: : , : , : , and from two symmetrical locations in region I: : and : . For the periodic oscillatory flow for all these signals are periodic as in figure c. Moreover, the signal from the antisymmetric points and would be identical. For as shown in figure 19 we observe the loss of symmetry indicated by the differences between signals from and . While the flow is symmetric and periodic for a considerable time, it is interrupted by seemingly random anti-symmetric and high-intensity bursts. Such bursts can be clearly identified in the left half of the torus by the signals of , and at and of and at , leading to an asymmetric flow as indicated by the differences in the signals from and .

Figure b shows the five signals at the same monitoring points for (a) and for (b). For the time traces of the streamwise velocity are similar to those at . The symmetry of the signals and is only slightly perturbed. However, the nonlinearity in the oscillations is stronger which also shows up by higher Fourier components in the spectrum (not shown). Furthermore, periodic oscillations are difficult to be recognized in the signals from , and .

At (figure bb) the flow has changed significantly as compared to . The signal is dominated by high-frequency and random oscillations in all monitoring points. The symmetry between signals and is completely lost. The character of the fluctuations evidence turbulent characteristics. It is noted that the overall amplitudes of the fluctuations have decreased at and as compared to lower Reynolds numbers.

A comparison between figures ba and b shows that the high-frequency fluctuation in (b) are essentially absent in (a). Therefore, we consider the flow at to be chaotic while the flow at is considered turbulent. For a further classification of different flow regimes a more detailed investigation of the turbulent fluctuations is required.

3.5 Friction factor

The mean streamwise pressure gradient in the range was obtained by measuring pressure differences between two pressure holes in an angular distance . Measurements were only made while the sphere was moving on the side of the torus opposite of the bore holes. For the pressure difference was found to be constant during a sufficiently long time span, i.e. any pressure fluctuations were sufficiently small to measure the mean pressure difference with a maximum r.m.s. value of 0.4 Pa.

Figure 21 shows the Fanning friction factor

(4)

determined from pressure-loss measurements (squares). The measurements are in good agreement with published data for helical pipes, in particular, for the laminar regime. Deviations from the laminar friction factor approximated by the power law of Mishra & Gupta (1979) become appreciable for beyond which the measured friction factor decays more rapidly than the power law. This trend is alleviated by the onset of oscillations at at which point the slope of the friction-factor should change. However, we have not enough data to unambiguously resolve the change of the slope. After a transitional range a further change of the slope of can be clearly recognized at . For the measured data are in reasonable good agreement with the correlation of Ito (1959) for helical pipes.

Figure 21: Friction factor measured in the closed torus as a function of the Reynolds number. Straight lines indicate laminar- and turbulent-flow correlations and , respectively, of Mishra & Gupta (1979) and the turbulent-flow correlation of Ito (1959), both for helical pipes.

4 Discussion

The torus experiment revealed a first instability of the toroidal-pipe flow in the bulk to a traveling wave at . As the Reynolds number is increased from its critical value the amplitude of the fundamental Fourier mode grows continuously and homogeneously, indicating a forward Hopf bifurcation. For the fundamental frequency develops sidebands. We anticipate that the sidebands are caused by an incommensurate frequency. The traveling wave represents a large-scale structure occupying the full cross section of the pipe. In addition, we find intermittent small-scale and nearly streamwise vortices which are localized in the wall layer in the vicinity of the impingement point C. For the spectrum becomes broadband and the signal exhibits high-frequency fluctuations. The corresponding threshold Reynolds number bracketed by PIV was confirmed by pressure-drop measurements which revealed a continuous dependence of the pressure drop on Re with a sudden reduction of the slope at .

Since flow instabilities in toroidal pipes have merely been considered by Piazza & Ciofalo (2011), albeit for periodic boundary conditions, our results can only be further compared with the results for helical pipes of Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) and Webster & Humphrey (1993, 1997). Regarding the friction factor measurements in the transitional regime we compare our results with those of Cioncolini & Santini (2006) for helical pipes. When comparing with helically coiled pipes it is tacitly assumed that the particular driving mechanism in the present experiment does not significantly modify the bulk flow, nor does the small pitch of the helical winding (see e.g. Berger et al., 1983; Piazza & Ciofalo, 2011). Common to all these investigations, the loss of stability of the steady basic flow occurs in the range with a subsequent traveling-wave regime for .

Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) used a curvature of which is similar to the present value of . Our quantitative results are in good agreement with their qualitative observations. Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) detected periodic and quasiperiodic low frequency oscillations near the inner wall of the pipe and high-frequency bursts near its outer wall. The signals were detected by two hot wire probes in the midplane and at from the wall at points A and C. The slightly larger critical Reynolds number of obtained by Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) may be due to the small difference in and/or the small amplitude of the traveling-wave at the loci of the hot-wire probes (cf. figure 14). Furthermore, the low-frequency signals measured by Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) at have neither a constant amplitude nor a constant frequency. In fact, they are very similar to our result for the quasiperiodic regime (see e.g.  in figure b). Also the coexistence of a low-frequency modulated wave with short, high-frequency bursts in different regions of the flow for is consistent with the present findings. As Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) did neither specify any wavelengths nor amplitudes a more quantitative comparison cannot be made.

Webster & Humphrey (1993) investigated a nominally fully developed flow through a helically coiled pipe with a curvature of using LDV. The curvature is even closer to the present value. In the range the authors found periodic flow oscillations with a constant fundamental Strouhal number measured in the inner half of the pipe cross section. This is qualitatively compatible with our result. However, we find a nearly linear variation of the fundamental frequency from to .

When comparing with the above investigations it must be noted that Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983) used a long straight-pipe section before the inlet of the coiled pipe, whereas Webster & Humphrey (1993) used a ’flow straightener’ in the straight-pipe section, about thirty pipe diameters upstream of the inlet of the curved pipe. For Reynolds numbers at which the flow is turbulent in the straight pipe two experiments may represent quite different inlet conditions for the curved pipe. This could be the reason why the first critical Reynolds number determined by Webster & Humphrey (1993) is well above the critical Reynolds number determined by Sreenivasan & Strykowski (1983), and also larger than the present critical Reynolds number .

The numerical simulations of Webster & Humphrey (1997) revealed that the amplitude of the traveling wave is very small near the midplane and that the maximum streamwise velocity perturbations arise in the center of region I. This is confirmed by our measurements (compare figure 7 of Webster & Humphrey (1997) with figures 12 and 14). Wavelengths and phase velocities are of the same order of magnitude, even though differences remain.

The only study to date of the transition to turbulence in a torus is due to Piazza & Ciofalo (2011). For curvatures and they numerically simulated the flow in a torus, driven by an artificial azimuthal body force, for periodic boundary conditions and several Reynolds numbers in the range from 3500 to 14700. Upon an increase of the Reynolds number Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) found stationary, periodic, quasi-periodic and chaotic flows. The flow states found are in qualitative agreement with our experimental results. However, there are differences.

For , a value much larger than the present curvature , Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) reported a supercritical Hopf bifurcation at , giving rise to a traveling wave along the Dean vortices. A second Hopf bifurcation between led to a quasi-periodic flow where the additional frequency is associated with oblique vortices located near the outer equator at C. While the sequence of bifurcations and the regions where the two waves have a sizable amplitude agree qualitatively with our results, the symmetry with respect to the midplane differs, because both modes found by Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) are anti-symmetric with respect to the equatorial plane.

For , a value much closer but yet a factor of two larger than the present curvature, the periodic and quasi-periodic waves found by Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) are mirror symmetric as in our measurements, but the first instability at is a saddle-node bifurcation associated with a subcritical Hopf bifurcation. In contrast, we find a supercritical Hopf bifurcation for . This difference might be attributed to the different curvatures investigated. It is also not precluded that the different boundary conditions lead to different finite-amplitude flow patterns when different modes of the corresponding linear-stability problem are only weakly damped.

Piazza & Ciofalo (2011) have sketched a tentative map of flow states in the -plane (their figure 30). Accordingly, the range of chaotic flow is strongly stabilized as is increased from zero, giving way to symmetry-breaking bifurcations at larger . In order to elaborate their flow map, further experimental investigations for smaller would be desirable.

Despite of the differences in the setup and the boundary conditions of the above studies on curved pipe flow, there exists no sharp jump in the friction factor upon transition to turbulence as is known from the flow in straight pipes. In the present toroidal pipe flow the flow changes gradually and the friction factor is a monotonous function of Re. Thus no distinct onset of turbulence can be detected by pressure drop measurements. However, we found indications for an onset of chaotic motion at and a clear change of the slope of in the logarithmic friction-factor diagram at which we could correlate, by PIV measurements, to the onset of irregular high-frequency fluctuations.

For helically coiled pipes Cioncolini & Santini (2006) analyzed the influence of coil curvature by examination of friction factor profiles. Their findings are in very good qualitative agreement, as they report a gradual discontinuity in the friction factor profiles, marking the end of the turbulence emergence process. It must be noted, however, that their results indicate the discontinuity at for (according to their equation (13)), which is considerably lower than found in the present investigation.

5 Summary

A novel experiment has been set up which realizes a flow with a precisely adjustable flow rate in a toroidal pipe, allowing to accurately measure the cross-sectional velocity field using optical techniques. The facility has proven a useful tool to explore the transition to turbulence in a curved pipe.

Using SPIV distinct flow states have been identified and characterized for the curvature . Mean velocity profiles along the vertical and horizontal axes of the pipe cross section have been measured as function of the Reynolds number. Moreover, instantaneous flow fields were obtained for different Reynolds numbers. The first critical Reynolds number has been determined very accurately. The bifurcation is of supercritical Hopf type. A further critical Reynolds number was found at at which the flow becomes presumably quasi-periodic. The space resolved measurements allowed to identify the spatial and temporal structures of the dominant oscillatory mode just above the threshold as well as large and small scale fluctuations which arise in different regions of the flow for . The SPIV measurements have shown that the flow becomes turbulent at , a value consistent with the shape of the friction factor curve which has been measured in the range of .

The present investigation, using a single curvature, has confirmed the scenario of bifurcations that precede the onset of turbulent flow. Perhaps most importantly, we have measured the traveling wave resulting from the first supercritical instability fully resolved in the cross-sectional plane and in time. These measurements allowed to identify the interplay between streamwise vortices and streaks on which the traveling wave is based. From these observations we deduce that the first instability is caused by the alternating radial gradients (under ) of the streamwise velocity near region I. This result is in some contrast to previous interpretations in terms of a centrifugal instability.

In view of the sparsity of detailed results on transitional toroidal pipe flow and the qualitative and quantitative differences among the few previous investigations a more systematic variation of the curvature would be desirable in order to clarify the remaining open points. Of particular interest would be the dependence of the first critical Reynolds number on the curvature, the existence ranges of other flow regimes which arise through higher-order bifurcations, and the competition with turbulent spots which may arise on a decrease of the radius ratio. Another interesting aspect would be the continuation of the unstable wave solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations (Faisst & Eckhardt, 2003; Wedin & Kerswell, 2004) as the curvature is increased from zero to curved pipe flow for which stable waves are known to exist.

Footnotes

  1. thanks: Email address for correspondence: jakob.kuehnen@ist.ac.at

References

  1. Adler, M. 1934 Flow in curved tubes. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 14, 257–275.
  2. Avila, Kerstin, Moxey, David, de Lozar, Alberto, Avila, Marc, Barkley, Dwight & Hof, Björn 2011 The onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Science 333 (6039), 192–196.
  3. Berger, S. A., Talbot, L. & Yao, L. S. 1983 Flow in curved pipes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 461–512.
  4. Budwig, R. 1994 Refractive index matching methods for liquid flow investigations. Exp. Fluids 17, 350–355.
  5. Cioncolini, Andrea & Santini, Lorenzo 2006 An experimental investigation regarding the laminar to turbulent flow transition in helically coiled pipes. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 30 (4), 367 – 380.
  6. Dean, W. R. 1927 Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Philos. Mag. 4, 208–223.
  7. Dean, W. R. 1928 The streamline motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Philos. Mag. 7, 673–695.
  8. van Doorne, C. W. H. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Measurement of laminar, transitional and turbulent pipe flow using stereoscopic-PIV. Exp. Fluids 42, 259–279.
  9. Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Eckhardt, Bruno 2008 Turbulence transition in pipe flow: some open questions. Nonlinearity 21 (1), T1.
  11. Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T. M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulent transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 447–468.
  12. Faisst, H. & Eckhardt, B. 2003 Traveling waves in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 224502.
  13. Hasson, D. 1955 Streamline flow resistance in coils. Res. Corresp. 1, 1.
  14. Hewitt, R. E., Hazel, A. L., Clarke, R. J. & Denier, J. P. 2011 Unsteady flow in a rotating torus after a sudden change in rotation rate. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 88–119.
  15. Hof, B., van Doorne, C. W. H., Westerweel, J., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. & Faisst, H. 2004 Experimental observation of nonlinear traveling waves in turbulent pipe flow. Science 305, 1594–1598.
  16. Hopkins, L. M., Kelly, J. T., Wexler, A. S. & Prasad, A. K. 2000 Particle image velocimetry measurements in complex geometries. Exp. Fluids 29, 91–95.
  17. Hüttl, T. J. & Friedrich, R. 2000 Influence of curvature and torsion on turbulent flow in helically coiled pipes. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 345–353.
  18. Hüttl, T. J. & Friedrich, R. 2001 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows in curved and helically coiled pipes. Comput. Fluids 30, 591–605.
  19. Ito, H. 1959 Friction factors for turbulent flow in curved pipes. J. Basic Eng. Trans. ASME 81, 123–134.
  20. Lowe, M. L. & Kutt, P. H. 1992 Refraction through cylindrical tubes. Exp. Fluids 13, 315–320.
  21. Madden, F. N. & Mullin, T. 1994 The spin-up from rest of a fluid-filled torus. J. Fluid Mech. 265, 217–244.
  22. Mishra, P. & Gupta, S. N. 1979 Momentum transfer in curved pipes 1. newtonian fluids; 2. non-newtonian fluids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 18, 130.
  23. Mullin, T. 2011 Experimental studies of transition to turbulence in a pipe. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 (1), 1–24.
  24. Naphon, P. & Wongwises, S. 2006 A review of flow and heat transfer characteristics in curved tubes. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 10, 463–490.
  25. Piazza, Ivan Di & Ciofalo, Michele 2011 Transition to turbulence in toroidal pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 687, 72–117.
  26. del Pino, C., Hewitt, R. E., Clarke, R. J., Mullin, T. & Denier, J. P. 2008 Unsteady fronts in the spin-down of a fluid-filled torus. Phys. Fluids 20 (12), 124104.
  27. Reynolds, O. 1883 An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous and of the law of resistance in parallel channels. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 174, 935.
  28. Sreenivasan, K. R. & Strykowski, P. J. 1983 Stabilization effects in flow through helically coiled pipes. Exp. Fluids 1, 31–36.
  29. Taylor, G. I. 1929 The criterion for turbulence in curved pipes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 124, 243–249.
  30. Vashisth, Subhashini, Kumar, Vimal & Nigam, Krishna D. P. 2008 A review on the potential applications of curved geometries in process industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 47 (10), 3291–3337.
  31. Webster, D. R. & Humphrey, J. A. C. 1993 Experimental observation of flow instability in a helical coil. Journal of Fluids Engineering 115 (3), 436–443.
  32. Webster, D. R. & Humphrey, J. A. C. 1997 Traveling wave instability in helical coil flow. Phys. Fluids 9, 407–418.
  33. Wedin, H. & Kerswell, R. R. 2004 Exact coherent structures in pipe flow: traveling wave solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 333–371.
  34. White, C. M. 1929 Streamline flow through curved pipes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 123, 645–663.
100249
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
Edit
-  
Unpublish
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel
Comments 0
Request comment
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description