Evidence for CO shock excitation in NGC 6240 from Herschel SPIRE spectroscopy

Evidence for CO shock excitation in NGC 6240 from Herschel SPIRE spectroscopy

R. Meijerink L.E. Kristensen A. Wei P.P. van der Werf F. Walter M. Spaans A.F. Loenen J. Fischer F.P. Israel K. Isaak P.P. Papadopoulos S. Aalto L. Armus V. Charmandaris K.M. Dasyra T. Diaz-Santos A. Evans Y. Gao E. González-Alfonso R. Güsten C. Henkel C. Kramer S. Lord J. Martín-Pintado D. Naylor D.B. Sanders H. Smith L. Spinoglio G. Stacey S. Veilleux M.C. Wiedner
Abstract

We present Herschel SPIRE FTS spectroscopy of the nearby luminous infrared galaxy NGC 6240. In total 20 lines are detected, including CO through , 6 HO rotational lines, and [] and [] fine-structure lines. The CO to continuum luminosity ratio is 10 times higher in NGC 6240 than Mrk 231. Although the CO ladders of NGC 6240 and Mrk 231 are very similar, UV and/or X-ray irradiation are unlikely to be responsible for the excitation of the gas in NGC 6240. We applied both C and J shock models to the H and lines and the CO rotational ladder. The CO ladder is best reproduced by a model with shock velocity  km s and a pre-shock density  cm. We find that the solution best fitting the H lines is degenerate: The shock velocities and number densities range between  km s and  cm, respectively. The H lines thus need a much more powerful shock than the CO lines. We deduce that most of the gas is currently moderately stirred up by slow (10 km s) shocks while only a small fraction ( percent) of the ISM is exposed to the high velocity shocks. This implies that the gas is rapidly loosing its highly turbulent motions. We argue that a high CO line-to-continuum ratio is a key diagnostic for the presence of shocks.

Subject headings:
galaxies: individual (NGC 6240) — galaxies: active — galaxies: nuclei — galaxies: starburst — infrared: galaxies
\address

Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands \address Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands \address Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 16, Bonn, D-53121, Germany \address Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, Heidelberg, D-69117, Germany \address Naval Research Laboratory, Remote Sensing Division, Washington, DC 20375, USA \address ESA Astrophysics Missions Division, ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands \address Department of Radio and Space Science, Onsala Observatory, Chalmers University of Technology, 43992 Onsala, Sweden \address Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, MS 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA \address University of Crete, Department of Physics, 71003 Heraklion, Greece \addressObservatoire de Paris, LERMA (CNRS:UMR8112), 61 Av. de l’Observatoire, F-75014, Paris, France \address Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, 530 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA \address National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA \addressPurple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2 West Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, PR China \address Universidad de Alcalá Henares, Departamente de Física, Campus Universitario, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain \addressAstron. Dept., King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia \address Instituto Radioastronomie Millimetrica (IRAM), Av. Divina Pastora 7, Nucleo Central, 18012 Granada, Spain \address NASA Herschel Science Center, California Institute of Technology, M.S. 100–22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA \addressDepartamento de Astrofisica Molecular e Infrarroja-Instituto de Estructura de la Materia-CSIC, Calle Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain \addressDepartment of Physics, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 1B1, Canada \address University of Hawaii, Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA \address Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA \address Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, INAF, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133, Roma, Italy \address Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA \address Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA \address Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, CNRS, 61 Av. de l’Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France

1. Introduction

We present Herschel111Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA SPIRE FTS (Griffin et al., 2010) observations of the nearby luminous infrared galaxy NGC 6240 (IRAS 16504+0228, UGC 10592). With a redshift of and a 7-year WMAP flat cosmology ( km s Mpc, , ) NGC 6240 is at a luminosity distance of  Mpc, with corresponding to 492 pc. The derived  m luminosity of the merger galaxy NGC 6240 is  L. Different power sources are suggested for this infrared luminosity, which complicate the interpretation of observations. The source is a strong X-ray emitter. Based on modeling of Chandra between  keV, Komossa et al. (2003) derive extinction corrected luminosities of  erg s and  erg s for the northern and southern AGN cores in the energy range  keV. However, using BeppoSAX observations, Vignati et al. (1999) find that the intrinsic hard X-ray luminosity shows up above  keV, and their models of the higher energy yields  erg s. Hydrogen recombination lines (Rieke et al., 1985; Depoy et al., 1986; Elston & Maloney, 1990; van der Werf et al., 1993) and luminous PAH emission (Armus et al., 2006) in the two nuclei indicate recent star formation. The H 2.12 m line, presented by van der Werf et al. (1993), shows a peak in the overlap region between these two nuclei, which are 2 apart. This H emission extends over several kpc and shows a complex morphology. The authors conclude that the bright H emission between the nuclei is generated in shocks resulting from the collision of the interstellar media (ISM) of the merging galaxies. More recently, Engel et al. (2010) observed the same line at high spatial (0.5″) and spectral ( km s) resolution. The line profiles also indicate multiple components, and the dispersion map suggests that the gas is highly disturbed and turbulent. Interferometric observations of several CO, HCN, and HCO lines show a high-density peak between the two nuclei (Tacconi et al., 1999; Nakanishi et al., 2005; Iono et al., 2007). Tacconi et al. (1999) conclude that NGC 6240 is in an earlier merging stage than Arp 220, the prototypical ultra-luminous infrared galaxy, and state that the gas is in the process of settling between the two nuclei, and dissipating angular momentum rapidly. Engel et al. (2010) also presented a CO interferometric map, and conclude that the H and CO emission are coextensive, but do not coincide with the stellar emission distribution.

This paper is ordered as follows. In Section 2, the observations, data reduction and line luminosities are discussed. In Section 3, we discuss the different excitation components (PDR, XDR, shocks) in combination with the geometry of NGC 6240. Consequently, we compose a CO ladder using both the available SPIRE FTS and ground based CO data from Papadopoulos et al. (2011) and compare this system to the ULIRG Mrk 231 (previously studied by us with Herschel, van der Werf et al., 2010). Then we analyze this with shock models from Kristensen et al. (2007). In Section 4, we conclude with a discussion and a summary of the results.

2. Observations, data reduction, and results

NGC 6240 was observed (Observations ID 1342214831) in staring mode with the SPIRE FTS on February 27, 2011, as part of the Herschel Open Time Key Program HerCULES (P.I. Van der Werf). The high spectral resolution mode was used, yielding a resolution of  GHz over both observing bands: the low frequency band covering  GHz ( m) and the high frequency band covering  GHz ( m). In total 97 repetitions (194 FTS scans) were carried out, yielding an on source integration time of 12920 s (3.6 hrs) for each band. A reference measurement was used to subtract the combined emission from the sky, telescope and instrument. The data were processed and calibrated using HIPE version 6.0. The extent of the CO emission is (Wilson et al., 2008), while the SPIRE beam varies from to 42 over our spectrum. Therefore, a point source calibration procedure was adopted, and no corrections for wavelength dependent beam coupling factors were necessary.

The full SPIRE FTS spectrum of NGC 6240 is shown in Fig. 1. In the overlap region between the two frequency bands ( GHz), the noisy parts of the two spectrometer bands were clipped and plotted on top of each other. A total of 20 lines were detected of which one line at the observed frequency  GHz remains unidentified. We also see hints of absorption and emission between, e.g., 1300 and 1350 GHz. The significance of these features are still under investigation, and requires a more advanced flux extraction than currently adopted. The identified lines include the CO to , 6 HO lines, [] 370 and 609 m, and [] 205 m. A well-constrained upper limit was obtained for the CO line. The line fluxes are listed in Table 1. In all cases a simple integration over the line was done. This procedure was repeated with approximately 100 different choices of baseline and integration intervals. Specifically, the integration is done from to  GHz centered on the line with steps of 0.4 GHz (10 integration borders). For each of these integration borders, the baseline window is set from to  GHz with steps of 0.15 Ghz (10 iterations for each of the integration borders). The average is taken as the line flux and the standard deviation of the different realizations is taken as the error, and excludes the relative calibration error of 7 percent. This is also done for fluxes of lines that are blended. For these, for each iteration, a double Gaussian was fitted and the peaks were used to set the fractional flux for each of the lines. As additional modeling constraints, the table lists fluxes for three lower CO transitions (Papadopoulos et al., 2011), and luminosities of four H transitions (Tecza et al., 2000). From these four H lines, Tecza et al. (2000) estimated an unattenuated power of  L.

Line
[Ghz] [m] [Jy km s] [L]

CO 2600.76
CO 1300.40
CO 866.963
CO 449.99 650.252
CO 562.41 520.231
CO 674.83 433.556
CO 787.25 371.650
CO 899.68 325.225
CO 1012.1 289.120
CO 1124.5 260.240
CO 1236.9 236.613
CO 1349.1 216.927
CO 1461.2 200.272
CO 645.21 453.498
480.27 609.135
789.95 370.415
1426.1 205.300
HO 734.22 398.643
HO 964.61 303.456
HO 1071.5 273.193
HO 1086.7 269.272
HO 1135.3 257.795
HO 1199.8 243.974
UID line 1472.7 198.689
H 2.12
H 2.22
H 2.25
H 2.15

Papadopoulos et al. (2011)
upper limit
Tecza et al. (2000), extinction corrected values, luminosities adjusted to adopted distance
relative uncertainties for are the same as for

Table 1Derived fluxes from the SPIRE FTS observations supplemented with ground-based observations
Figure 1.— Full SPIRE FTS spectrum of NGC 6240 and zoom-in on line blends, with on the x-axis the frequency and on the y-axis the flux density in Jy. The detected lines are marked: CO (red), [] and [] (green), HO (orange), and unidentified (brown). In the overlap region between the two frequency bands ( GHz), the noisy parts were clipped and plotted on top of each other.

3. Analysis

We will focus on the excitation of the CO ladder, and compare CO excitation conditions to those of H. A multicomponent Large Velocity Gradient (LVG) analysis of the CO ladder, considering also constraints from the HCN and [CI] lines will be presented in another paper (Papadopoulos et al., in prep.). Preliminary mass estimates from this study are consistent with those found by Papadopoulos et al. (2012), Greve et al. (2009), Tacconi et al. (1999), and Engel et al. (2010). Estimates range between and  M, depending on whether low and/or high density tracers are used.

The total luminosity in the CO lines listed in Table 1 is  L. In the absence of measurements this is a lower limit to the total luminosity in the CO lines. Although the line luminosity of the CO transition is largest, the luminosity in the individual CO lines is only slowly decreasing for higher rotational quantum numbers, and a significant contribution is expected from transitions with . The shape of the CO ladder of NGC 6240 is similar to that of Mrk 231 (see Fig. 2) and can be fitted by two photon-dominated region (PDR) models and an X-ray dominated region (XDR) model (see van der Werf et al., 2010). The physical and geometrical properties of NGC 6240 are different from those of Mrk 231. We argue below why the fit used for Mrk 231 is not appropriate for NGC 6240, and why shocks must be responsible for the CO excitation in NGC 6240:

Absence of OH and HO: The NGC 6240 spectrum does not show emission line features of the ionic species OH and HO, observed in Mrk 231 (van der Werf et al., 2010). Large OH and HO abundances are only sustained in gas clouds with high ionization fractions (), which are produced by elevated cosmic ray or X-ray fluxes (cf., Meijerink et al., 2011). Their absence hints that the bulk of the gas is not exposed to high ionization rates resulting from AGN or starburst/supervae activity.

Figure 2.— Comparison of the CO ladder of NGC 6240 to those obtained for Mrk 231 (van der Werf et al., 2010). The CO ladder of Mrk 231 is normalized to the CO luminosity of NGC 6240.

Line-to-continuum ratio: The CO luminosity (up to the transition) to infrared (measured between  m) luminosity ratio is in NGC 6240. This is exceptionally high, and approximately an order of magnitude higher than the ratio found for Mrk 231 (van der Werf et al., 2010) and Arp 220 (Rangwala et al., 2011). An exceptionally high line to FIR continuum ratio is also found for the H lines of NGC 6240 (van der Werf et al., 1993). Our PDR and XDR models (Meijerink & Spaans, 2005; Meijerink et al., 2007) give a maximum ratio of (assuming erg s cm sr, see Kaufman et al., 1999), where the XDR ratios are highest. Most of the absorbed photons in a PDR will heat the dust. An AGN (creating an XDR) generates a UV continuum which contains approximately ten times more energy than the X-ray field, and also heats the dust efficiently. In shocks, on the contrary, the gas is compressed and heated to higher temperatures, while the dust is not affected (except for shock velocities and densities that are orders of magnitude higher). Assuming that shocks are not heating the dust and that all the far-infrared luminosity is reprocessed radiation from the AGN, we obtain a maximum AGN contribution of percent. So, a shock dominated ISM can yield a much larger line-to-continuum ratio than PDRs and XDRs and this is exactly what we see in NGC 6240.

Geometry of NGC 6240: The bulk of the gas mass does not coincide with the two AGN nuclei or with star formation. Engel et al. (2010) relate gas masses, as traced by the CO emission, to the different locations in NGC 6240: and 25 to the northern and southern AGN nuclei, and to the CO peak in the overlap region, while using apertures of 1″. Our FTS beam () is larger than the galaxy, and traces the total CO emission. We determined a FWHM of  km s for the CO emission with a gaussiansinc profile fit (larger than the instrumental resolution of 245 km s at this frequency range). This is similar to the FWHM of the CO line at the emission peak between the two nuclei, suggesting that the CO emission is also located in this region. The projected distance between these nuclei on the sky is  pc, and the true distance between them is estimated at 1.4 kpc (Tecza et al., 2000). These authors assume that the two nuclei are on a circular orbit, of which the position angle and inclination are the same as that of the CO-disk between the two nuclei (Tacconi et al., 1999), and that the velocity difference between the two nuclei is 150 km s. The AGN X-ray luminosities are not enough to power the CO excitation of the gas that is residing between the two nuclei, since they are geometrically diluted and absorbed: The luminosities derived by Komossa et al. (2003) give an X-ray flux at 250 pc from the AGN of  erg cm s. Vignati et al. (1999) derive a much larger luminosity by an obscured AGN, with an absorbing screen of  cm which also reduces the X-ray fluxes below  erg cm s. This leaves room for an XDR component located near the AGN nuclei, but even the most optimistic estimate of the X-ray luminosity is not enough to explain the combined H and CO luminosity of  L erg s. This would require a strong coupling of the X-rays to the molecular gas.

3.1. Shock modeling

Figure 3.— C-shock model (solid line) with density  cm and shock velocity  km s overlaid on the observed CO line fluxes (diamonds) for NGC 6240.

Given our arguments discussed above and the fact that various papers (cf., van der Werf et al., 1993; Tecza et al., 2000) have argued that C type shocks are exciting the H lines in NGC 6240, we analyze the CO ladder with shock models. Two types of shocks are used: a magnetic continuous (-type) and a non-magnetic jump (-type) shock model. In both types, ro-vibrational levels of H are excited through high temperature HH, HH, and He-H collisions. As the shock develops, the temperature of the gas becomes such that the excited vibrational states become populated. We use the Flower & Pineau des Forêts (2003) shock code to model the H ratio and the CO ladder. Kristensen et al. (2007) used this model to calculate a grid, spanning hydrogen number densities between and  cm, velocities between and  km s, and transverse magnetic field densities  G, with b=1 and 5. The magnetic field density relation implies values between 100 and 3000 G for the adopted densities, which is within the range of values observed for galactic molecular clouds (Crutcher, 1999).

Using a rotational diagram and assuming that the CO lines are optically thin, we find  K for the CO rotational transitions between CO and . This rotational temperature increases to values  K at the highest CO transitions. We note that for the highest transitions the rotational temperature is a lower limit to the kinetic temperature, since these transitions are slightly sub-thermally excited. Using a chi-square fit and including the errors provided in Table 1, the best-fitting C-type shock model has a hydrogen number density of  cm and velocity of km s (see Fig. 3). The density is well constrained, and chi-square values increase by an order of magnitude when going to densities or  cm. The uncertainty in the shock velocity is a few km s. Downstream in this particular model, the CO gas has been compressed by a factor of 7.2 and the post-shock density of the CO emitting gas is cm.

The and H lines have upper level energies of and 12500 K, respectively, and are therefore only excited when the gas temperature  K. It turns out that there is a degeneracy between pre-shock density and velocity for reproducing the observed ratio of (Tecza et al., 2000). The lower the pre-shock density, the higher the velocity that is required: The solutions range between hydrogen number density  cm and a shock velocity  km s to a pre-shock density of  cm combined with a velocity of  km s.

4. Discussion and conclusions

Shock modeling: Combining the model results for the H and CO emission, we find that the H to CO intensity ratio is of order . In contrast, the observed H / CO line luminosity ratio is approximately . The low density, low velocity shock model fitting the CO lines, has a low temperature and does not produce H emission. From this we conclude that only a very small fraction of the gas mass is currently exposed to very powerful shocks (with either very high densities,  cm and moderate shock velocities  km s or moderate densities,  cm, combined with a high shock velocity  km s). Most of the shocked gas is settling and equilibrating with the ambient ISM, which is in agreement with the fast dissipation timescale derived below.

Dissipation timescales: If we assume that all the gas is colliding at a shock velocity  km s (which is the highest velocity allowed by the models reproducing the H lines), the total amount of energy available (for an adopted gas mass of  M, in the middle of the LVG masses derived by various authors) is  erg, which is very similar to the value derived by Tacconi et al. (1999). Assuming no additional energy input and that CO traces the bulk of the gas mass, this would imply that the CO shock energy is dissipated away within 6.6 million years, well within the orbital timescale of the two nuclei of million years (Tacconi et al., 1999).

Excitation by UV/X-rays vs. Shocks: The observed H / ratio falls within the range of ratios that are produced by X-ray dominated regions (see, e.g., Maloney et al., 1996, Fig. 6). Also, the CO ladder of NGC 6240 resembles the one observed for Mrk 231 (van der Werf et al., 2010). However, as mentioned before, NGC 6240 is lacking the bright OH and HO lines, which are associated with gas clouds that are exposed to extremely high cosmic ray or X-ray ionization rates (Meijerink et al., 2011), and the available X-ray photons are not sufficient to dominate the chemistry and thermal balance of the bulk of the gas (see Sect. 3.1). The HO lines are less luminous than in Mrk 231. This implies either lower water abundances or a less efficient mode of excitation. A full analysis is beyond the scope of this paper. These results and the similarity to the high- CO line distribution in Mrk 231 suggest that shocks possibly due to the massive molecular outflow (Fischer et al., 2010; Feruglio et al., 2010; Sturm et al., 2011) may also contribute to the CO line emission in Mrk 231. Indeed, based on millimeter interferometric observations of Mrk 231, Cicone et al. (2012) note that in the inner region ( kpc), the CO()/CO() ratio is slightly higher, indicative of a shock contribution.

Observing strategies for ALMA and other sub-millimeter facilities: Although the observed CO ladders for Mrk 231 and NGC 6240 are practically indistinguishable, we argue that shock excitation and not X-rays are responsible for the excitation of the CO ladder, based on our knowledge of the geometry of the NGC 6240. Such an analysis will not be possible in the study of the ISM in galaxies at high redshift. At those distances, we are unable to resolve the offset between the two radio nuclei and the location of the CO emitting gas, and X-ray fluxes cannot be determined. Therefore, we have to rely on dust continuum and line emission at far-infrared and sub-millimeter wavelengths. Here we have argued that a high line-to-continuum ratio is a key diagnostic for the presence of shocks. Additionally, more detailed modeling of emission by molecules and ions, such as HO, HO and OH, will help in making this distinction, and are thus also highly recommended to include in future ALMA programs.

We acknowledge the constructive comments by the referee Christine Wilson. The following institutes have provided hardware and software elements to the SPIRE project: University of Lethbridge, Canada; NAOC, Beijing, China; CEA Saclay, CEA Grenoble and LAM in France; IFSI, Rome, and University of Padua, Italy; IAC, Tenerife, Spain; Stockholm Observatory, Sweden; Cardiff University, Imperial College London, UCL-MSSL, STFCRAL, UK ATC Edinburgh, and the University of Sussex in the UK. Funding for SPIRE has been provided by the national agencies of the participating countries and by internal institute funding: CSA in Canada; NAOC in China; CNES, CNRS, and CEA in France; ASI in Italy; MEC in Spain; Stockholm Observatory in Sweden; STFC in the UK; and NASA in the USA. Additional funding support for some instrument activities has been provided by ESA. US authors ackowledge support from the NHSC. Basic research in IR astronomy at NRL is funded by the US ONR.

References

  • Armus et al. (2006) Armus, L., Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 204
  • Cicone et al. (2012) Cicone, C., Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A99
  • Crutcher (1999) Crutcher, R. M. 1999, ApJ, 520, 706
  • Depoy et al. (1986) Depoy, D. L., Becklin, E. E., & Wynn-Williams, C. G. 1986, ApJ, 307, 116
  • Elston & Maloney (1990) Elston, R., & Maloney, P. 1990, ApJ, 357, 91
  • Engel et al. (2010) Engel, H., Davies, R. I., Genzel, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 524, A56
  • Feruglio et al. (2010) Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L155
  • Fischer et al. (2010) Fischer, J., Sturm, E., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L41
  • Flower & Pineau des Forêts (2003) Flower, D. R., & Pineau des Forêts, G. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 390
  • Greve et al. (2009) Greve, T. R., Papadopoulos, P. P., Gao, Y., & Radford, S. J. E. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1432
  • Griffin et al. (2010) Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3
  • Iono et al. (2007) Iono, D., Wilson, C. D., Takakuwa, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 283
  • Kaufman et al. (1999) Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J., & Luhman, M. L. 1999, ApJ, 527, 795
  • Komossa et al. (2003) Komossa, S., Burwitz, V., Hasinger, G., et al. 2003, ApJ, 582, L15
  • Kristensen et al. (2007) Kristensen, L. E., Ravkilde, T. L., Field, D., Lemaire, J. L., & Pineau Des Forêts, G. 2007, A&A, 469, 561
  • Maloney et al. (1996) Maloney, P. R., Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1996, ApJ, 466, 561
  • Meijerink & Spaans (2005) Meijerink, R., & Spaans, M. 2005, A&A, 436, 397
  • Meijerink et al. (2007) Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., & Israel, F. P. 2007, A&A, 461, 793
  • Meijerink et al. (2011) Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., Loenen, A. F., & van der Werf, P. P. 2011, A&A, 525, A119
  • Nakanishi et al. (2005) Nakanishi, K., Okumura, S. K., Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., & Nakagawa, T. 2005, PASJ, 57, 575
  • Papadopoulos et al. (2012) Papadopoulos, P. P., van der Werf, P., Xilouris, E., Isaak, K. G., & Gao, Y. 2012, ArXiv e-prints
  • Papadopoulos et al. (2011) Papadopoulos, P. P., van der Werf, P., Xilouris, E. M., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints
  • Rangwala et al. (2011) Rangwala, N., Maloney, P. R., Glenn, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 94
  • Rieke et al. (1985) Rieke, G. H., Cutri, R. M., Black, J. H., et al. 1985, ApJ, 290, 116
  • Sturm et al. (2011) Sturm, E., González-Alfonso, E., Veilleux, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L16
  • Tacconi et al. (1999) Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., Tecza, M., et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, 732
  • Tecza et al. (2000) Tecza, M., Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 178
  • van der Werf et al. (1993) van der Werf, P. P., Genzel, R., Krabbe, A., et al. 1993, ApJ, 405, 522
  • van der Werf et al. (2010) van der Werf, P. P., Isaak, K. G., Meijerink, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L42
  • Vignati et al. (1999) Vignati, P., Molendi, S., Matt, G., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, L57
  • Wilson et al. (2008) Wilson, C. D., Petitpas, G. R., Iono, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 189
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
114346
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description