Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scattering

Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scattering

P. Adlarson Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    W. Augustyniak Department of Nuclear Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    W. Bardan Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    M. Bashkanov Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    F.S. Bergmann Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    M. Berłowski High Energy Physics Department, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    H. Bhatt Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai–400076, Maharashtra, India    M. Büscher Peter Grünberg Institut, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Institut für Laser- und Plasmaphysik, Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany    H. Calén Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    I. Ciepał Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    H. Clement Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    D. Coderre [ Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Institut für Experimentalphysik I, Ruhr–Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany    E. Czerwiński Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    K. Demmich Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    E. Doroshkevich Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    R. Engels Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Erven Zentralinstitut für Engineering, Elektronik und Analytik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    W. Erven Zentralinstitut für Engineering, Elektronik und Analytik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    W. Eyrich Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich–Alexander–Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erwin–Rommel-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany    P. Fedorets Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya 25, 117218 Moscow, Russia    K. Föhl II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus–Liebig–Universität Gießen, Heinrich–Buff–Ring 16, 35392 Giessen, Germany    K. Fransson Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    F. Goldenbaum Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    P. Goslawski Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    A. Goswami Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Khandwa Road, Indore–452017, Madhya Pradesh, India    K. Grigoryev Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany III. Physikalisches Institut B, Physikzentrum, RWTH Aachen, 52056 Aachen, Germany High Energy Physics Division, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Orlova Rosha 2, Gatchina, Leningrad district 188300, Russia    C.–O. Gullström Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    F. Hauenstein Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich–Alexander–Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erwin–Rommel-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany    L. Heijkenskjöld Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    V. Hejny Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    M. Hodana Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    B. Höistad Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    N. Hüsken Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    A. Jany Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    B.R. Jany Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    L. Jarczyk Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    T. Johansson Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    B. Kamys Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    G. Kemmerling Zentralinstitut für Engineering, Elektronik und Analytik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    F.A. Khan Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Khoukaz Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    D.A. Kirillov Veksler and Baldin Laboratory of High Energiy Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Physics, Joliot–Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia    S. Kistryn Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    H. Kleines Zentralinstitut für Engineering, Elektronik und Analytik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    B. Kłos August Chełkowski Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Uniwersytecka 4, 40-007, Katowice, Poland    M. Krapp Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich–Alexander–Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erwin–Rommel-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany    W. Krzemień Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    P. Kulessa The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 152 Radzikowskiego St, 31-342 Kraków, Poland    A. Kupść Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden High Energy Physics Department, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    K. Lalwani [ Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai–400076, Maharashtra, India    D. Lersch Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    B. Lorentz Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Magiera Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    R. Maier Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    P. Marciniewski Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    B. Mariański Department of Nuclear Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    M. Mikirtychiants Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Institut für Experimentalphysik I, Ruhr–Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany High Energy Physics Division, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Orlova Rosha 2, Gatchina, Leningrad district 188300, Russia    H.–P. Morsch Department of Nuclear Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    P. Moskal Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    H. Ohm Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    I. Ozerianska Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    E. Perez del Rio Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    N.M. Piskunov Veksler and Baldin Laboratory of High Energiy Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Physics, Joliot–Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia    P. Podkopał Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    D. Prasuhn Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Pricking Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    D. Pszczel Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden High Energy Physics Department, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    K. Pysz The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 152 Radzikowskiego St, 31-342 Kraków, Poland    A. Pyszniak Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    C.F. Redmer [ Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    J. Ritman Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Institut für Experimentalphysik I, Ruhr–Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany    A. Roy Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Khandwa Road, Indore–452017, Madhya Pradesh, India    Z. Rudy Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    S. Sawant Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai–400076, Maharashtra, India Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    S. Schadmand Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    T. Sefzick Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    V. Serdyuk Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    V. Serdyuk Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Dzhelepov Laboratory of Nuclear Problems, Joint Institute for Nuclear Physics, Joliot–Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia    R. Siudak The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 152 Radzikowskiego St, 31-342 Kraków, Poland    T. Skorodko Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    M. Skurzok Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    J. Smyrski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    V. Sopov Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya 25, 117218 Moscow, Russia    R. Stassen Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    J. Stepaniak High Energy Physics Department, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    E. Stephan August Chełkowski Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Uniwersytecka 4, 40-007, Katowice, Poland    G. Sterzenbach Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    H. Stockhorst Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    H. Ströher Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Szczurek The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 152 Radzikowskiego St, 31-342 Kraków, Poland    A. Täschner Institut für Kernphysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Wilhelm–Klemm–Str. 9, 48149 Münster, Germany    A. Trzciński Department of Nuclear Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    R. Varma Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai–400076, Maharashtra, India    G.J. Wagner Physikalisches Institut, Eberhard–Karls–Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany    M. Wolke Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    A. Wrońska Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    P. Wüstner Zentralinstitut für Engineering, Elektronik und Analytik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    P. Wurm Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    A. Yamamoto High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0801, Japan    L. Yurev [ Dzhelepov Laboratory of Nuclear Problems, Joint Institute for Nuclear Physics, Joliot–Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia    J. Zabierowski Department of Cosmic Ray Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Uniwersytecka 5, 90–950 Łódź, Poland    M.J. Zieliński Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, ul. Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland    A. Zink Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich–Alexander–Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg, Erwin–Rommel-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany    J. Złomańczuk Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden    P. Żuprański Department of Nuclear Physics, National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. Hoza 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland    M. Żurek Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany    R. L. Workman Data Analysis Center at the Institute for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, U.S.A.    W. J. Briscoe Data Analysis Center at the Institute for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, U.S.A.    I. I. Strakovsky Data Analysis Center at the Institute for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, U.S.A.
September 22, 2019
Abstract

Exclusive and kinematically complete high-statistics measurements of quasifree polarized scattering have been performed in the energy region of the narrow resonance-like structure with ,  2380 MeV and 70 MeV observed recently in the double-pionic fusion channels and . The experiment was carried out with the WASA detector setup at COSY having a polarized deuteron beam impinged on the hydrogen pellet target and utilizing the quasifree process . This allowed the analyzing power, , to be measured over a broad angular range. The obtained angular distributions deviate systematically from the current SAID SP07 NN partial-wave solution. Incorporating the new data into the SAID analysis produces a pole in the waves in support of the resonance hypothesis.

pacs:
13.75.Cs, 13.85.Dz, 14.20.Pt

present address: ]\Bern present address: ]\Delhi present address: ]\Mainz present address: ]\Sheff

WASA-at-COSY Collaboration

SAID Data Analysis Center

I Introduction

Recent exclusive and kinematically complete measurements of the basic double-pionic fusion reactions and revealed a narrow resonance-like structure in the total cross section MB ; MB ; isofus at a mass 2380 MeV with a width of 70 MeV, which is consistent with a assignment MB . Additional evidence for this structure has recently been found in the reaction TS , where it was denoted by , following the notation associated with the so-called "inevitable dibaryon" goldman .

If the observed resonance-like structure truly constitutes an -channel resonance in the neutron-proton system, then it must be seen in the observables of elastic scattering. In Ref. PBC this resonance effect in scattering has been estimated. There it was shown that a noticeable effect should appear in the analyzing power , since this observable is composed only of interference terms between partial waves, thus being most sensitive to small changes in the partial waves.

For the analyzing power, there exist data only below and above the resonance region. These data sets, at  = 1.095 GeV ( = 2.36 GeV) ball ; les and  = 1.27 GeV ( = 2.43 GeV) mak ; dieb , exhibit very similar angular distributions. This gap in the existing measurements of has motivated the present study.

Ii Experiment

We have measured the energy dependence of polarized elastic scattering in the quasifree mode. The experiment was carried out with the WASA detector CB ; wasa at COSY (FZ Jülich), using a polarized deuteron beam with an energy of  = 2.27 GeV impinging on the WASA hydrogen pellet target. With this setup, a full energy coverage of the conjectured resonance was obtained. Note that we observe here the quasi-free scattering process in inverse kinematics, which allows a detection of the fast spectator proton in the forward detector of WASA.

Since we deal here with events originating from channels with large cross section, the trigger was solely requesting one hit in the first layer of the forward range hodoscope. This hit could originate from either a charged particle or a neutron. For the case of quasifree scattering, this defines three event classes, each having the spectator proton appearing in the forward detector:

  • scattered proton and scattered neutron both detected in the central detector, covering the neutron angle region ,

  • scattered proton detected in the forward detector, with the scattered neutron being unmeasured, covering and

  • scattered proton detected in the central detector, with the neutron being unmeasured, covering the angular range .

Combining events, nearly the full range of neutron scattering angles could be covered.

Since, through the use of the inverse kinematics, the spectator proton is in the beam particle, the deuteron, the spectator is very fast. This allows its detection in the forward detector. By reconstruction of its kinetic energy and its direction the full four-momentum of the spectator proton has been determined.

Similarly, the four-momentum of the actively scattered proton has been obtained from its track information in either the forward or central detector (in the latter case the energy information was not retrieved).

Therefore, we have reconstructed the full event, including the four-momentum of the unmeasured neutron, and even have one overconstraint in the subsequent kinematic fit, when the neutron has not been measured explicitly.

In the case where the neutron has been detected by a hit in the calorimeter (composed of 1012 CsI(Na) crystals) of the central detector – associated with no hit in the preceding plastic scintillator barrel, the directional information of the scattered neutron has also been obtained. Therefore, these events have undergone a kinematic fit with two overconstraints.

In order to avoid a distortion of the beam polarization, the magnetic field of the solenoid in the central detector was switched off. The measurements were carried out with cycles of the beam polarization "up", "down" and unpolarized (originating from the same polarized source), where "up" and "down" refers to a horizontal scattering plane. We verified that the beam, originating from the polarized source, indeed was unpolarized when using it in its "unpolarized" mode. This was accomplished by comparing the azimuthal angular dependence of the scattered events to that obtained through the use of a conventional unpolarized source.

The magnitude of the beam polarization was determined and monitored by elastic scattering, which was measured in parallel by detecting the scattered deuteron in the forward detector as well as the associated scattered proton in the central detector. The vector and tensor components of the deuteron beam were obtained by fitting our results, for the vector and tensor analyzing power, to those obtained previously at ANL ANL for = 2.0 GeV and more recently at COSY-ANKE ANKE at = 2.27 GeV. As a result we obtained beam polarizations of , = 0.65(2) for "up" and = -0.45(2), = 0.17(2) for "down". The vector polarization of the beam, for quasifree scattering, has been checked by quasifree scattering. This was also measured in parallel by detecting one of the protons in the forward detector and the other one in the central detector, in addition, checking their angular correlation for elastic events. Our results for the quasifree analyzing power are in quantitative agreement both with the EDDA measurements EDDA of free scattering and with the current SAID phase shift solution SP07 Arndt07 .

Since we have measurements with spin "up", "down" and unpolarized, the vector analyzing power can be derived in three different ways, by using each two of the three spin orientations. All three methods should give identical results. Differences may be taken as an estimate of systematic uncertainties which are added quadratically to the statistical ones to give the total uncertainties plotted in Figs. 1,2 and 4.

The momentum distribution of the observed spectator proton, in the elastic scattering process, agrees with Monte Carlo simulations of the proton momentum distribution in the deuteron filtered by the acceptance of the WASA detector. In order to assure a quasi-free process, we omit events with spectator momenta larger than 0.16 GeV/c (in the deuteron rest system) as done in previous work MB ; isofus .

Iii Results and Discussion

Due to the Fermi motion of the nucleons bound in the beam deuteron, the measurement of the quasi-free scattering process covers a range of energies in the system. Meaningful statistics could be collected for the range of center-of-mass energies 2.36 2.41 GeV corresponding to = 1.10 - 1.20 GeV. First, we show the data (solid circles) in Fig. 1 without selecting specific center-of-mass energies, i.e. without accounting for the spectator momentum. Hence this data set corresponds to the weighted average over the covered interval of . The solid line represents the current SAID SP07 partial-wave solution Arndt07 , whereas dashed and dotted lines give the results of revised SAID partial-wave analyses, including the WASA dataset, as described below. Next, we have taken the measured spectator four-momentum into account and constructed the effective for each event. We thus obtained angular distributions sorted into six bins, two of which are shown in Fig. 2 as examples. All of our data deviate strikingly from the SP07 solution.

Figure 1: (Color online) Angular distribution of the analyzing power without consideration of the spectator momentum, corresponding to a weighted average over the measured interval = 2.367 - 2.403 GeV ( = 1.108 - 1.197 GeV) with a centroid at = 2.377 GeV. The results from this work are shown as solid circles with error bars including both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The solid line represents the SAID SP07 phase shift prediction Arndt07 , whereas the dashed (dotted) line gives the result of the new weighted (unweighted) SAID partial-wave solution (see text).
Figure 2: (Color online) Notation as in Fig. 1, but for = 2.367 (top) and 2.403 GeV (bottom) corresponding to = 1.11 and 1.20 GeV. The full symbols denote results from this work taking into account the spectator four-momentum information. For the meaning of the curves see Fig. 1.

As a test, the present data set was included in the SAID database and the phenomenological approach used in generating the partial-wave solution, SP07 Arndt07 , was retained. Here we first considered whether the existing form was capable of describing these new measurements. One advantage of this approach is that the employed Chew-Mandelstam K-matrix can produce a pole in the complex energy plane without the explicit inclusion of a K-matrix pole in the fit form. Neither the existence of a pole nor the effected partial waves are predetermined. A detailed overview of this formalism is given in Ref.Arndt87 .

The fitted data were angular distributions at values of 1.108, 1.125, 1.135, 1.139, 1.156, 1.171, and 1.197 GeV. A first attempt to fit this dataset started from the functional form of the current SP07 fit, and only varied the associated free parameters. A /datum of 1.8 was found for all angular distributions, apart from the one at 1135 MeV. This was fairly consistent with the overall /datum given by the global fit of elastic scattering data to 2 GeV. However, the set at 1135 MeV contributed a /datum of about 25, having better statistics and a wider angular coverage.

The fit parameters are expansion coefficients for the K-matrix elements, which are smooth in energy; either polynomials or basis elements having required left-hand cuts, as described in Ref.Arndt87 . Failing to reproduce the 1135 MeV set, the fit form was scanned to find partial waves for which an added term in the K-matrix expansion produced the most efficient reduction in . The addition of parameters and re-fitting resulted in a rapid variation of the coupled and waves in the vicinity of the problematic 1135 MeV data set.

Some weighting was necessary in this fit, as only a few angular points from the full set were determining the altered energy dependence. The fit was repeated with different weightings for the 1135 MeV dataset. Having found a better fit at 1135 MeV, a subsequent fit was produced without weighting. These, qualitatively similar, results are compared in the figures.

In Fig. 1 we plot the fit to the 1135 MeV angular distribution from the SP07 prediction (not including the new data), a weighted fit ( errors decreased by a factor of 4 ), and an unweighted fit including the present dataset and using the new fit form.

Resulting changes in the - coupled waves are displayed in Fig. 3. Here the wave obtained a typical resonance-like shape, whereas the wave changed less dramatically. A search of the complex energy plane revealed a pole in the coupled - wave. Other partial waves did not change significantly over the energy range spanned by the new data. Fig. 3 also displays single-energy solutions, generated from the old SP07 fit. These discrete points are fits to data within narrow energy bins, allowing amplitude variations to produce a best fit to data, and are used to search for systematic deviations from the global fit Arndt87 . In the partial-wave plot near 1135 MeV, the new fit appears to agree with these single-energy results much better than SP07.

The fit repeated with different weightings for the new data resulted in a variation of the pole position and could be considered a minimal ’error’ on its value within the present fit form. In the weighted fits, a pole was located at (2392 - i37) MeV. The re-fit without weighting produced a pole with (2385 - i39) MeV. Together with a speed-plot determination we arrive at () MeV as our best estimate for the pole position.

Figure 3: (Color online) Changes to the (dimensionless) (top) and (middle) partial waves including their mixing amplitude (bottom). Solid (dotted) curves give the real (imaginary) part of the partial-wave amplitudes from SP07, whereas the dashed (dash-dotted) curves represent the new (weighted) solution. Results from previous single-energy fits Arndt07 are shown as solid circles (real part) and inverted triangles (imaginary part). Vertical arrows and horizontal bars indicate mass and width of the resonance (estimated from the pole position).
Figure 4: (Color online) Energy dependence of the analyzing power at = 83. The solid symbols denote the results from this work, the open symbols those from previous work ball ; les ; new ; arn ; bal1 ; mcn ; gla ; mak . For the meaning of the curves see Fig. 1. Vertical arrow and horizontal bar indicate mass and width of the resonance (estimated from the pole position).

From the decomposition of the observables into partial-wave amplitudes ArndtRoper , it follows that the resonance contribution in is proportional to the associated Legendre polynomial . is maximal at and minimal at . Since at the latter angle the differential cross section is at minimum and much lower than at the former angle, the resonance effect in becomes maximal at . To check this behavior, we have inspected the energy dependence of . In order to include a reasonable number of previous measurements, we have chosen the nearby angle to be plotted in Fig. 4. The data exhibit a pronounced resonance-like behavior in accordance with the new partial-wave solution – in tendency even somewhat narrower.

Iv Summary and Conclusions

In conclusion, our exclusive and kinematically complete measurement of quasi-free polarized scattering provides detailed high-statistics data for the analyzing power in the energy range, where previously a narrow resonance-like structure with was observed in the double-pionic fusion to deuterium. A partial-wave analysis including the new scattering data exhibits a resonance pole in the coupled - partial waves in accordance with the expectation of a resonance structure. This structure has been associated with a bound resonance, which could contain a mixture of asymptotic dyson and 6-quark, hidden color, configurations Brodsky . Though less exotic explanations cannot be excluded at the present stage, dibaryon systems matching the mass and width of this dibaryon candidate have been recently successfully generated within 3-body Gal and quark model qm calculations. It should be noted that earlier dibaryon candidates Arndt87 were widely discounted due to their appearance near the cut and the possibility of a pseudo-resonance mimicking their behavior. Such complications do not arise here – though we note the existence of a nearby threshold. However, we are not aware of any mechanism by which the very broad Roper resonance could induce the narrow resonance structure considered here.

Finally, we note that the new partial-wave solution improves also the description of total cross section data as well as polarization observables obtained at ANKE ANKEAXX in the resonance region. A full account of the new results will be given in an extended forthcoming paper.

We acknowledge valuable discussions with J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, A. Kacharava and C. Wilkin on this issue. This work has been supported by BMBF, Forschungszentrum Jülich (COSY-FFE), the U.S. Department of Energy Grant DE-FG02-99ER41110, the Polish National Science Centre (grant No. 2011/03/B/ST2/01847) and the Foundation for Polish Science (MPD).

References

  • (1) M. Bashkanov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 052301 (2009).
  • (2) P. Adlarson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 242302 (2011).
  • (3) P. Adlarson et al., Phys. Lett. B 721, 229 (2013).
  • (4) P. Adlarson et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 055208 (2013).
  • (5) T. Goldman et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 1889 (1989).
  • (6) A. Pricking, M. Bashkanov, H. Clement, arxiv:1310.5532 [nucl-ex].
  • (7) J. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. A 559, 489 (1993).
  • (8) A. de Lesquen et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 11, 69 (1999).
  • (9) Y. Makdisi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1529 (1980).
  • (10) R. Diebold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 632 (1975).
  • (11) Chr. Bargholtz et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 594, 339 (2008).
  • (12) H. H. Adam et al., arxiv: nucl-ex/0411038.
  • (13) M. Haji-Saied et al., Phys. Rev. C 36, 2010 (1987).
  • (14) D. Mchedlishvili, Internal ANKE report 28 (2013).
  • (15) M. Altmeier et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 23, 351 (2005).
  • (16) SAID data base http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu/; R. A. Arndt et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 025209 (2007).
  • (17) R.A. Arndt, J.S. Hyslop, L.D. Roper, Phys. Rev. D35, 128 (1987).
  • (18) R. A. Arndt et al., Phys. Rev. D 28, 97 (1983).
  • (19) C. R. Newsom et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 965 (1989).
  • (20) J. Arnold et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 67 (2000).
  • (21) J. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. B 286, 635 (1987).
  • (22) M. W. McNaughton et al., Phys. Rev. C 48, 256 (1993); 53, 1092 (1996).
  • (23) G. Glass et al., Phys. Rev. C 47, 1369 (1993).
  • (24) F. J. Dyson, N.-H. Xuong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 815 (1964).
  • (25) M. Bashkanov, S. Brodsky, H. Clement, Phys. Lett. B727, 438 (2013).
  • (26) A. Gal, H. Garcilazo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 172301 (2013) and Nucl. Phys. A, in press (DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.02.019).
  • (27) H. Huang, J. Ping, F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C89, 034001 (2014).
  • (28) D. Mchedlishvili et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 49 (2013).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
151126
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description