Enhanced low-temperature entropy and flat-band ferromagnetism in the t-J model on the sawtooth lattice

Enhanced low-temperature entropy and flat-band ferromagnetism in the model on the sawtooth lattice

A. Honecker ahoneck@uni-goettingen.de J. Richter
7 June 20062006
7 June 20062006
Abstract

Using the example of the sawtooth chain, we argue that the model shares important features with the Hubbard model on highly frustrated lattices. The lowest single-fermion band is completely flat (for a specific choice of the hopping parameters in the case of the sawtooth chain), giving rise to single-particle excitations which can be localized in real space. These localized excitations do not interact for sufficient spatial separations such that exact many-electron states can also be constructed. Furthermore, all these excitations acquire zero energy for a suitable choice of the chemical potential . This leads to: (i) a jump in the particle density at zero temperature, (ii) a finite zero-temperature entropy, (iii) a ferromagnetic ground state with a charge gap when the flat band is fully occupied and (iv) unusually large temperature variations when is varied adiabatically at finite temperature.

keywords:
Pacs:
71.10.Fd, 65.40.Gr \KEYflat band, localized states, frustrated lattice, model, entropy
volume: issue: 2thanks: Participation at ICM2006 supported by the DFG through SFB 602.\real@refstepcounter

address\beg@elem\report@eltaddress\proc@elemaddressInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Göttingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany\@newelemtrue\@address

\real@refstepcounter

address\beg@elem\report@eltaddress\proc@elemaddressInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, 39016 Magdeburg, Germany

\@address

310 2007

During the past years, it has been noted that exact ground states can be constructed for the antiferromagnetic model at high fields on a large class of highly frustrated lattices (see [1, 2, 3] and references therein). This leads to a finite zero-temperature entropy exactly at the saturation field and an enhanced magnetocaloric effect [2, 4, 5, 6], suggesting potential applications for efficient low-temperature magnetic refrigeration [4, 7]. Recently, we have pointed out [8] analogies to flat-band ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model on the same lattices (see e.g. [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]).

Figure 1: Inset: The sawtooth chain model. Filled circles show electron sites. The hopping (magnetic exchange) are () along the base line and () along the dashed zigzag-line, respectively. The bold valley shows the area occupied by a localized excitation. Main panel: Hole density at temperature as a function of chemical potential for and two choices of .

Here we will illustrate some of the issues with exact diagonalization results for the model. The model arises as the large- limit of the Hubbard model and is defined by the Hamiltonian

(1)

The sums run over the nearest-neighbor pairs of a lattice with sites. and are the usual fermion creation and annihilation operators, is the projector which eliminates doubly occupied sites, is the total number operator at site , and are spin-1/2 operators acting on an occupied site .

Here we will concentrate on the sawtooth chain model sketched in the inset of Fig. 1. The lower of the two branches of the single-electron dispersion becomes completely flat for . For this choice one can construct first localized single-electron excitations living in one of the valleys of the sawtooth chain (bold dashed line in the inset of Fig. 1), and then excitations with electrons which are non-interacting for sufficient spatial separations and thus have energy , in exactly the same manner as for the Hubbard model [8]. So far, the magnetic exchanges are arbitrary. However, it will turn out that they should be chosen sufficiently weak in order to ensure that the non-interacting localized many-electron states are the ground states in their respective particle number subspaces. At half filling only the magnetic part of the model survives such that it reduces to the previously studied antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 Heisenberg model (see [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] for the sawtooth chain).

The main panel of Fig. 1 shows finite-system results for at versus for (these curves are the electronic counterpart of the magnetization curves [3]). For small magnetic exchange (like ), there is a jump of height exactly at . At this point, all localized many-electron excitations collapse to . Furthermore, for the number of ground states is 1, 12, 54, 112, 105, 36, 7 in the sectors with , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively. This leads to a ground-state entropy per site at for . The ground-state degeneracies are exactly the same as for the Hubbard model [14] consistent with the ground states of the model for small and being projections of those of the Hubbard model. General theorems for the Hubbard model imply a saturated ferromagnetic ground state for (see e.g. [11, 12, 13] for the sawtooth chain). Numerically, we find a fully saturated ferromagnet for the model in the sectors with and . The plateau at in the -curve in Fig. 1 shows that the ground state is a saturated ferromagnet for , corresponding to an appreciable charge gap.

The situation changes for larger antiferromagnetic , as illustrated for in Fig. 1. In this case the localized states are no longer the lowest-energy states. This is signalled by a shift of the jump between and to which now corresponds to a true first-order transition. The charge gap, i.e., the plateau at is also present in this case.

Figure 2: Curves of constant entropy for , , and sites.

The ground-state degeneracies are reflected by thermodynamic properties, as illustrated for the entropy in Fig. 2 (the curves of constant correspond to the adiabatic demagnetization curves of the magnetic counterpart [4]). In particular, the finite entropy at leads to large temperature changes during adiabatic variations of , even cooling to as at low temperatures. The low-temperature properties for close to are controlled by the localized states and are independent of the details of the microscopic model ( in the model and in the Hubbard model [14]); finite-size effects are also small in this region. By contrast, the behavior for in Fig. 2 exhibits strong finite-size effects at low temperatures and depends on details of the model: for example, in this region the presence of doubly occupied sites leads to qualitatively different behavior of the Hubbard model [14].

We have focussed on the sawtooth chain, but it should share important features with a large class of highly frustrated lattices such as the kagomé lattice [1, 6, 9] which do not require any fine-tuning. We expect that the model with weak has the same localized excitations as the repulsive Hubbard model such that it shares in particular the same properties with respect to flat-band ferromagnetism [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. The main advantage of the model is a substantially reduced Hilbert space dimension close to which simplifies a full diagonalization and thus the exact determination of finite-temperature properties of a finite system.

References

  • [1] J. Schulenburg, A. Honecker, J. Schnack, J. Richter and H.-J. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 167207.
  • [2] J. Richter, J. Schulenburg and A. Honecker, Lect. Notes Phys. 645 (2004), p. 85.
  • [3] J. Richter, J. Schulenburg, A. Honecker, J. Schnack and H.-J. Schmidt, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 (2004), p. S779.
  • [4] M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. Honecker, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2004), P07012.
  • [5] O. Derzhko and J. Richter, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004), 104415; Eur. Phys. J. B 52 (2006), p. 23.
  • [6] M. E. Zhitomirsky and H. Tsunetsugu, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004), 100403(R); Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 160 (2005), p. 361.
  • [7] M. E. Zhitomirsky, Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003), 104421.
  • [8] A. Honecker and J. Richter,  Condensed Matter Physics 8 (2005), p. 813.
  • [9] A. Mielke, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25 (1992), p. 4335.
  • [10] H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), p. 1608.
  • [11] H. Tasaki, Progr. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998), p. 489.
  • [12] M. Ichimura, K. Kusakabe, S. Watanabe and T. Onogi, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998), p. 9595.
  • [13] S. Nishino, M. Goda and K. Kusakabe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003), p. 2015.
  • [14] O. Derzhko, A. Honecker and J. Richter, Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007), 220402(R).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
192296
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description