Energy scale calibration of KEDR detector tagging system

Energy scale calibration of KEDR detector tagging system

V.V. Kaminskiy,    N.Yu. Muchnoi and    V.N. Zhilich
Abstract

The tagging system of the KEDR detector is a symmetrical focusing magnetic spectrometer for electrons and positrons scattered at small angles; it is embedded into the lattice of the VEPP-4M collider and intended for two-photon processes study. It measures scattered electron energy with resolution ( is the beam energy). For precise energy scale calibration two methods are used: tagging of bremsstrahlung electron/positron by the photon energy measured by BGO calorimeter, and direct calibration using Compton backscattering spectrum edge. This report covers design and current status of the calibration system.

Prepared for submission to JINST

Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics
27 February - 3 March, 2017
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia


Energy scale calibration of KEDR detector tagging system

 

  • Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS,
    Novosibirsk, Russia

  • Novosibirsk State University,
    Novosibirsk, Russia

E-mail: v.v.kaminskiy@inp.nsk.su

Keywords: Spectrometers, Detector alignment and calibration methods, Accelerator modelling and simulations

ArXiv ePrint: 1705.10114

 


 


1 KEDR detector tagging system

Two-photon processes study is an essential part of the KEDR detector and the VEPP-4M collider (at BINP SB RAS) physical program [1]. For this purpose the KEDR detector has a unique tagging system (TS) for electrons and positrons scattered at small angles after interaction [2]. The invariant two-photon mass can be calculated:

(1.1)

where , are virtual photons energies, is the beam energy, , are scattered electron and positron energies.

TS is a symmetrical focusing magnetic spectrometer embedded in the VEPP-4M lattice. It consists of 4 bending magnets, 4 quadrupole lenses, 3 solenoids and also sextupoles, beam orbit correctors and other elements. Scattered electrons (or positrons, briefly, SE) initially go along the equilibrium beam; then they are deflected by dipole magnets and registered by coordinate detectors (drift tube hodoscope and GEM detector). Two quadrupole lenses focus SE at some distance depending of its energy; dipole magnets deflect the focus point from the equilibrium beam. For optimum resolution 8 coordinate detectors are placed at the focus curve. The spectrometer energy resolution varies from 0.03% to 0.6% of the beam energy, and two-photon system invariant mass resolution varies from 3 GeV to 20 GeV in the beam energy range of 1.5–5.0 GeV.

Figure 1: Layout of the KEDR detector tagging system. NEM, SEM are bending magnets; NEL, SEL are quadrupole lenses; TS are coordinate detectors; BGO are calorimeters; LM are luminosity monitors.

In common case, the horizontal coordinate depends on the SE energy :

(1.2)

where is the beam energy, which is known at the VEPP-4M collider with accuracy better than (below 2 GeV); and depend on bending magnets field, the TS modules geometry, the beam orbit and fields of the other magnets. So, if one knows , , and measures , one can calculate the SE energy. For a high precision, the TS energy scale should be calibrated using a physical processes.

For the TS calibration two methods are used. Single bremsstrahlung (SB) electron energy is a difference between the initial beam energy and a photon energy : , so, SE energy tagging by a photon energy is applied [3] (see Figure 2). The TS has two BGO calorimeters for a photon energy measurement. The calorimeters are calibrated using narrow spectrum edges from SB and Compton backscattering (see Figure 3). Other approach uses coordinate spectrum edge of Compton backscattered electrons/positrons.

Figure 2: At right: a calibration of the TS4 coordinate module using the BGO calorimeter. The graph is fitted with a function (it is derived from equation 1.2). At left: a difference between and the fitting curve which can be considered as the accuracy/nonlinearity of the calibration (larger points spread at higher coordinate is due to lower event count).

2 Compton backscattering

Compton backscattering (CBS, or inverse Compton effect) is an inelastic head-on interaction of a low-energy photon ( eV) and an ultra-relativistic electron (or positron) ( GeV). When the photon scatters at zero angle (in the direction of the initial electron and backwards to the initial photon) the scattered photon energy is maximal and the scattered electron energy is minimal:

(2.1)

where is an electron rest energy (), . So, the energy spectrum of scattered photons is almost flat and extends from zero to a narrow edge at . The scattered electrons spectrum looks like photons spectrum reflected relatively to the beam energy. See energy and coordinate spectra at the Figure 3.

Figure 3: Experimental spectrum edges for Compton backscattering and single bremsstrahlung.  MeV,  eV. First plot from left: SB photon spectrum edge in the BGO calorimeter. Second: CBS photon spectrum edge. Third: electron CBS spectrum edge, X axis is energy lost by electron: , which is converted from coordinate.

So, if one provides the interaction of the monochromatic laser radiation with the electron beam and measures the transverse coordinate of the scattered electrons with minimum energy (Compton edge), one can match the coordinate and the energy. For a proper definition of and coefficients (see expression 1.2), one needs two spectrum edges, two laser wavelengths. With the lasers used in this work, TS4 modules can be calibrated in the beam energy range of 1.5–4.0 GeV (see Figure 4). It should be mentioned that most SE created in events are registerd in TS4 modules due to a low-energy dominated shape () of the virtual photons spectrum. Also the spectrum edge of Compton photons is used for the calibration of BGO calorimeters in the energy range of 40–1000 MeV within the same beam energy range (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: Possibilities for the TS calibration: coordinate detectors and BGO calorimeters.

3 Optical system

Solid-state pulsed lasers with a pulse duration less than 10 ns are used, so, Compton interaction occurs within 2 m around the center of the KEDR detector. A pulse repetition rate is 1000 Hz; it is generated from the signal of the VEPP-4M beam revolution frequency (819 kHz). Two lasers work at the electron side of TS: 1064 nm (Nd:YAG) and 527 nm (Nd:YLF with frequency doubling). Three-frequency Nd:YLF laser works at the positron side of TS: 1053 nm, 527 nm and 263 nm (4th harmonic currently is not used for TS calibration).

At the electron side two laser beams are mixed into one beam using ordinary and dichroic mirrors. The beam is focused by a motorized expander (two lenses in a tube with a variable gap between them) at some distance (approximately 22 m). Then the laser beam goes to a motorised two-axis mirror, which allows to adjust a transverse position of the laser beam in the interaction region. The laser beam is inserted into the vacuum chamber through a fused silica window and is reflected by a static mirror towards the electron beam.

At the positron side the laser beam is attenuated by a motorized polarizing prism. Then three wavelengths of the laser are separated by a motorized dispersing prism. Being reflected by a static mirror, the chosen beam is focused by a motorized expander, positioned by a movable mirror and inserted into the vacuum chamber similarly to the electron side.

A special Compton rate monitor is implemented to adjust the interaction. A special software controls parts of optical system: step motor controllers, delay lines, commutators, etc., and also it controls the whole installation. The software provides long-term (weeks) fully automated experiment. See more about optical system and its control in [4].

4 Energy scale calculation

Between physical calibrations, the TS energy scale is calculated using the model of VEPP-4M. This model generates particles of SB and CBS and simulate their propagation through the VEPP-4M lattice. The model uses measured currents, fields and the beam orbit within experimental runs (60…120 minutes). Coefficients and from equation 1.2 are calculated for 8 modules.

This model calculate relative changes of the energy scale. For calculated coefficients and a correction is made: , . and are found from runs with experimental calibration: and . When comparing calculated and measured Compton edge positions for long term, one can see that the model repeats position jumps and drifts after the experiment within 0.03% of the beam energy. We plan to improve the accuracy to the theoretical limit of 0.01%–0.02%.

5 Conclusions

Facility for the energy scale calibration of the KEDR detector tagging system was constructed: laser and optical system with two wavelengths for electron and positron beams, and control system. The facility works continuously and automatically. A method for scattered electron trajectories in the TS was created. It is based on measurement of parameters of the VEPP-4M collider magnetic elements and allows to calculate the TS energy scale with a reasonable accuracy. Work on improving accuracy and stability is going on.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 15-02-09016 A).

References

  • [1] V. Anashin et al., The KEDR detector, Physics of particles and nuclei 44 (2013) 657–702.
  • [2] V. Aulchenko et al., Upgrade of the KEDR tagging system, Nucl. Instr. & Meth. A 494 (2002) 241–245.
  • [3] V. Bobrovnikov et al., The energy calibration system of the KEDR tagger, JINST 9 (2014) C10017.
  • [4] V. Kaminskiy, N. Muchnoi and V. Zhilich, Compton backscattering for the calibration of KEDR tagging system, JINST 9 (2014) C08021.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
248469
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description