Emergent D5-Brane Background from D-Strings

Frank Ferrari and Antonin Rovai

Service de Physique Théorique et Mathématique

Université Libre de Bruxelles and International Solvay Institutes

Campus de la Plaine, CP 231, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgique frank.ferrari@ulb.ac.be, antonin.rovai@ulb.ac.be

We solve the worldsheet theory describing the near-horizon dynamics of a D-string in the presence of a very large number of D5-branes. The model is pre-geometric in the sense that the near-horizon worldsheet Lagrangian does not have dynamical fields associated with the dimensions transverse to the D5-branes. The solution at large is shown to be given by a classical action for the D-string moving in a curved ten-dimensional spacetime. The four dimensions transverse to the D5-branes emerge from the quantum loops of the original strongly coupled quantum worldsheet field theory. By comparing with the Dirac-Born-Infeld plus Chern-Simons action for a D-string in a general type IIB background, we identify the string-frame metric, dilaton and Ramond-Ramond three-form field-strength and find a match with the near-horizon geometry of a stack of D5-branes.

August 21, 2019

## 1 Introduction

The AdS/CFT correspondence [1, 2, 3] and its generalizations (see e.g. [4, 5] for reviews and references) offer a framework in which, at least in principle, geometry and quantum gravity can be studied from ordinary quantum field gauge theories. In this framework, a -dimensional field theory is postulated to be dual, in the large limit, to a classical gravitational theory defined on a higher dimensional curved spacetime. The additional dimensions are emerging from strongly coupled quantum physics in the gauge theory. The study of the emerging geometry from the pure field theory point of view is unfortunately rather difficult in general. It requires to compute observables in the strong coupling regime of the field theory and to extract from them informations about the dual geometry.

Recently, it was proposed in [6] to focus on the field theory models describing the near-horizon worldvolume dynamics of a fixed number of D-branes, called the probe branes, in the presence of a very large number of other D-branes, called the background branes. These models are pre-geometric, because they do not contain dynamical fields associated with the dimensions transverse to the background branes. According to the AdS/CFT lore, in the large limit, they should be equivalent to classical worldvolume theories describing the motion of the probe D-branes in the ten dimensional supergravity solution sourced by the background branes. This non-trivial supergravity solution should thus emerge, alongside the transverse dimensions of space on which it lives, from the large solution of the probe branes worldvolume model. Much more details on these ideas can be found in [6, 7, 8].

The power of this approach is that it is easier to extract some strong coupling information from the large probe brane models than from the large background brane theories [6]: the latter are complicated matrix models, whereas the former are vector-like models. It is then possible to explicitly *derive* the emergence of space from a microscopic calculation in the strongly coupled vector-like worldvolume theory. In all the examples that have been studied so far [6, 7, 9], the solution at large can be described by a classical action matching the non-abelian D-brane action for the probe branes in the correct ten-dimensional curved background. The scalar fields associated with the emerging classical dimensions of space are composite variables in the original microscopic description whose quantum fluctuations are suppressed in the large limit by the quantum loops of the vector variables.

The aim of the present work is to apply the above ideas to derive the emergent near-horizon geometry of a large number of D5-branes in type IIB string theory by studying the corresponding probe D-string worldsheet model. We start in Section 2 by presenting in details the relevant D-string microscopic pre-geometric worldsheet theory. We solve the model at large in Section 3 and find that the solution is expressed in terms of a classical action which contains the right dynamical fields to describe the motion of the D-strings in a ten-dimensional background. In Section 4, we compare the expansion of this action around a flat worldsheet with the corresponding terms derived from the well-known Dirac-Born-Infeld plus Chern-Simons D-string action in arbitrary supergravity background. This allows us to identify the string-frame metric, dilaton and Ramond-Ramond three-form field-strength from a purely field theoretic calculation. The result matches perfectly the near-horizon supergravity solution sourced by the background D5-branes.

## 2 The D-string microscopic action

In principle, we need the action describing the dynamics of the open string modes of a system composed of a fixed number of D-strings and a large number of D5-branes, in an appropriate decoupling, near-horizon limit [10]. All the branes are chosen to be parallel to each other, and we work in the Euclidean. In particular, the model preserves eight supercharges and there is an global symmetry group corresponding to rotations in spacetime preserving the brane configuration: is associated with rotations on the D-string worldsheet, with rotations on the D5-brane worldvolume transverse to the D-strings and with rotations transverse to both the D-strings and the D5-branes.

This action could be studied by evaluating appropriate low-energy limits of open string disk diagrams with various boundary conditions. This is a very tedious and complicated procedure, which was performed in the case of the D(-1)/D3 system in [11, 12]. In our case, the result is a sum of a worldsheet action for the D-strings and a worldvolume action for the D5-branes, with couplings between the D-string and D5-brane degrees of freedom. However, the naïve action obtained in this way for the degrees of freedom living on the D5-branes would not be renormalizable and thus could be used only in the infrared. In other words, the full description of the D5-brane is not field theoretic. Fortunately, an explicit description of the D5-brane degrees of freedom and their couplings to the D-strings will not be required for our purposes. Indeed, due to supersymmetry, these couplings are not expected to contribute to the terms in the effective action on which we shall focus. A similar non-renormalization theorem was discussed in [13] in the case of D-particles. We refer to [6] for a detailed discussion of these issues in the case of the D(-1)/D3 system and to [14] for a general discussion in non-supersymmetric contexts.

We thus focus on the D-string worldsheet Lagrangian, without referring any longer to possible couplings to the D5-brane fields. The form of the Lagrangian is strongly contrained by supersymmetry and global symmetries. The simplest way to derive it is to proceed in two steps. First, we perform the dimensional reduction of the U() gauge theory in six dimensions down to two dimensions. The theory must contain one hypermultiplet in the adjoint, corresponding to D1/D1 string degrees of freedom, and hypermultiplets in the fundamental corresponding to the D1/D5 strings. Second, a suitable scaling limit must be implemented on this action, which corresponds to the correct low energy limit associated with the standard Maldacena near-horizon limit [1, 10, 15]. We present these two steps successively in the next two subsections.

### 2.1 Dimensional reduction from six to two dimensions

The six dimensional gauge theory has a spacetime symmetry group , R-symmetry group , internal symmetry group and flavor symmetry group . The field content is as follows. The vector multiplet is composed of the gauge potential , and the gluino , which is a doublet of . The adjoint hypermultiplet contains the adjoint scalars in the vector of and a fermionic doublet of . The fundamental hypermultiplets contain scalar doublets and Weyl fermions in the fundamental and antifundamental of . The chirality of the Weyl spinors in the vector multiplet on the one hand and in the hypermultiplets on the other hand must be opposite.

After the dimensional reduction down to two dimensions, the six-dimensional spacetime symmetry group yields the two-dimensional spacetime symmetry group and a new global . The fields of the six-dimensional theory are then reorganized into representations of and , while their transformation laws under U(), U(), and are left unchanged.

More precisely, the six dimensional vector multiplet yields the two dimensional gauge field , four scalars transforming in the vector representation of and spinors , transforming in the representations and of . The adjoint hypermultiplet yields four scalars and spinors , transforming in the representations and of . Finally, the fundamental hypermultiplets yield the scalars and together with fermions in the and in the representations of respectively. Let us note that the model is also invariant under worldsheet parity transformations which act by exchanging the and factors of . All these symmetry properties are summarized in Table 1 in the Appendix.

The supersymmetric Lagrangian resulting from the dimensional reduction can then be written as

(2.1) |

We have introduced the usual complex worldsheet coordinates and , with associated covariant derivatives and . We have also introduced a self-dual auxiliary field in the adjoint of . This field allows us to write the quartic interactions between the scalars in a simple way which will be useful for performing the scaling limit in the next subsection. The overall normalization as well as the constant term in the Lagrangian are fixed by the D-string tension, the string length being related to the fundamental string tension by .

### 2.2 The scaling limit

The scalar fields and in the worldsheet Lagrangian (2.1) are associated with the motion of the D-strings parallel and transverse to the D5-branes respectively. The corresponding coordinates are

(2.2) |

To implement the standard decoupling, near-horizon limit [1, 10, 15], we take while keeping , and the six-dimensional ’t Hooft coupling fixed, as usual. Supersymmetry then dictates that the fermionic superpartners and of and respectively must also be kept fixed. Introducing , the Lagrangian (2.1) then simplifies in the scaling to

(2.3) |

This Lagrangian will be our starting point for the probe D-string worldsheet theory.

It is important to emphasize that the scalar fields are non-dynamical auxiliary variables in (2.3). Indeed, they do not have a kinetic term and could be trivially integrated out. However, as explained in the next Section, these fields become dynamical due to the quantum corrections and play a central rôle both in the mathematics and the physical interpretation of the solution of the model at large [6].

## 3 Solving the model at large

We now solve the model defined by the Lagrangian (2.3) along the lines of [6, 7, 9]. The crucial property is that the fields carry only one index and are thus vector-like variables. The large path integral over these fields can then always be performed exactly, using standard techniques for large vector models [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. The idea is to rewrite the action by introducing suitable auxiliary fields, in order to make the vector variables appear only quadratically. In our case, the relevant auxiliary fields are precisely the variables which we have already included when writing (2.3). The path integral over the vector variables is then Gaussian. The result is an effective action for the auxiliary fields, which become dynamical through the quantum loops of the vector variables. Moreover, and most importantly, this effective action is automatically proportional to because the vector fields have components. At large , it can thus be treated classically.

The resulting structure is thus perfectly consistent with the D-string seen as moving in a higher dimensional classical non-trivial background. Indeed, the fields can be interpreted as the emerging coordinates which behave classically at large and the metric on the emerging space will be related to the kinetic term for the .

Let us now carry out this procedure explicitly for our model, mainly focusing on the case of a single D-string probe.

### 3.1 Integrating out

The effective action is given by

(3.1) |

where is the action for the Lagrangian (2.3). In order to derive the emergent geometry, we can focus on the bosonic part of the effective action and thus set the fermionic fields and to zero. Note, however, that computing the fermionic terms in the effective action could also be done straightforwardly.

The integral (3.1) is Gaussian and yields

(3.2) |

where the determinants and are given by

(3.3) | ||||

(3.4) |

At large , the field is fixed in terms of the other variables by the saddle point equation

(3.5) |

If we specialize to the case of a single D-string probe, then the solution is simply . This follows from the vanishing of the linear term in in the expansion of (3.3) around or, equivalently, from the commuting nature of the and invariance. We thus get

(3.6) |

### 3.2 The effective action up to cubic order

We are going to use (3.6) up to order three in an expansion in the field strength and around constant values of the coordinate worldsheet fields,

(3.7) |

Eventually, we shall match up to this order in the next Section with the D-string action in a general type IIB background.

The explicit computation of the expansion is straightforward. Let us introduce the radial coordinate defined by

(3.8) |

We write

(3.9) | ||||

(3.10) |

in terms of the bosonic and fermionic propagators

(3.11) | ||||

(3.12) |

and with

(3.13) | ||||

(3.14) |

We then expand the traces in (3.9) and (3.10) using

(3.15) |

and compute the resulting one-loop Feynman integrals.

At zeroth and first order, the contributions from the bosonic and fermionic determinants cancel each other and only the constant D-string tension term in (3.6) remains. At second and third order, we obtain a non-local effective action, which we write as a power series in derivatives by expanding the associated Feynman integrals for small external momenta. Overall, we get

(3.16) |

where the stand for terms of quartic or higher order and terms with more than two derivatives. Of course, the result is consistent with the symmetries of the microscopic theory discussed in Section 2.1, including the worldsheet parity which must come accompanied by a parity transformation in the directions .

## 4 The emergent background

The action for a D-string moving in a general type IIB supergravity background is the sum of a Dirac-Born-Infeld term and a Chern-Simons term [21, 22],

(4.1) |

where the fields , , , and are the dilaton, string-frame metric, Kalb-Ramond two-form and Ramond-Ramond potentials respectively, is the worldsheet field strength and P denotes the pull-back of the spacetime fields to the worldsheet. Working in the static gauge and writing the fields , , corresponding to the coordinates transverse to the D-string worldsheet as

(4.2) |

we can expand (4.1) in powers of and . Following the basic idea that underlies the present work as well as our previous studies [6, 7, 9], this expansion should match with the similar expansion (3.16) of the effective action describing the solution of the large microscopic model of the D-strings in the presence of the D5-branes. Morevover, we should be able to derive the precise supergravity background sourced by the D5-branes from the coefficients in the expansion (3.16). Let us check that this is indeed the case.

The zeroth order Lagrangian derived in this way from (4.1) reads

(4.3) |

where the capital Latin indices correspond as usual to the directions parallel to the D-string worldsheet. Matching with the microscopic result (3.16) and taking into account worldsheet parity invariance yields the conditions

(4.4) |

Taking these constraints into account, the Lagrangian derived from (4.1) at first order in is, up to an irrelevant total derivative,

(4.5) |

where the matrix is the inverse of . Using the fact that in (3.16) and worldsheet parity, we get

(4.6) |

The conditions (4.4) thus reduce to

(4.7) |

Taking these results into account as well as the fact that from invariance along the worldsheet, the second order Lagrangian derived from (4.1) then reads

(4.8) |

where the matrix is the inverse of the two-by-two matrix . Comparing with (3.16) and using again parity invariance yields

(4.9) |

and then

(4.10) |

by using (4.7). Comparing the terms in (3.16) and (4.8), using (4.9) and the symmetry to fix , we find

(4.11) |

We thus find that the components and match, which shows that the metric has the expected isometry of the background sourced by D5-branes. We can continue the same analysis at third order. Using the constraints on the background that we have already derived, (4.1) yields the third order Lagrangian up to two derivative terms,

(4.12) |

Matching with (3.16) and using the invariance and isometry of the background, we then obtain

(4.13) |

Overall, we have derived the following type IIB supergravity background

(4.14) |

which perfectly matches with the well-known near-horizon geometry of D5-branes [23].

### Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Micha Moskovic for useful discussions. This work is supported in part by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Fondamentale Collective (grant 2.4655.07) and the Belgian Institut Interuniversitaire des Sciences Nucléaires (grant 4.4511.06 and 4.4514.08). A.R. is a Research Fellow of the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS.

## Appendix A Notations and conventions

We work in Euclidean signature throughout this paper. All our conventions are chosen consistently with those of [6, 7, 9].

### a.1 Symmetries and indices

For D-strings parallel to D-branes, the symmetry group is . The factor corresponds to rotations in the two-dimensional space parallel to the D-strings, the factor corresponds to rotations in the four-dimensional space parallel to the D5-branes and transverse to the D-strings and the factor corresponds to rotations in the four-dimensional space transverse to both the D-strings and the D5-branes.

We use indices for the vectors of , and for the vectors and left-handed spinors of respectively and and for the vectors and left-handed spinors of respectively. For right-handed spinors we use dotted indices , etc. The SO(4) spinor indices are raised and lowered according to the standard conventions

(A.1) | ||||

(A.2) |

with , and similarly for the SO(4) spinor indices etc.

We also have gauge group indices and for U() and U() respectively. We often suppress these indices if there is no ambiguity.

The branes are located in according to Table 2. We denote the two coordinates parallel to the D-strings and by the coordinates transverse to the D-strings. We also define the radial coordinate by

(A.3) |

(A.4) |

### a.2 Four-dimensional algebra

The standard Pauli matrices are taken to be

(A.5) |

We define

(A.6) |

and

(A.7) |

We have the useful following identities for the computation of the effective action at second and third order:

(A.8) | ||||

(A.9) |

for any numbers and where we set and .

## References

- [1] J. M. Maldacena, “The Large Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200.
- [2] S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge Theory Correlators from Noncritical String Theory,” Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, arXiv:hep-th/9802109.
- [3] E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150.
- [4] O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity,” Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183–386, arXiv:hep-th/9905111.
- [5] E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” arXiv:hep-th/0201253.
- [6] F. Ferrari, “Emergent Space and the Example of ,” Nucl. Phys. B869 (2013) 31–55, arXiv:1207.0886 [hep-th].
- [7] F. Ferrari, M. Moskovic, and A. Rovai, “Examples of Emergent Type IIB Backgrounds from Matrices,” arXiv:1301.3738 [hep-th].
- [8] F. Ferrari, “On Matrix Geometry and Effective Actions,” arXiv:1301.3722 [hep-th].
- [9] F. Ferrari and M. Moskovic, “Emergent D4-Brane Background from D-Particles,” arXiv:1301.7062 [hep-th].
- [10] N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the Large Limit of Theories with Sixteen Supercharges,” Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 046004, arXiv:hep-th/9802042 [hep-th].
- [11] M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, “D-Instanton Induced Interactions on a D3-Brane,” JHEP 0002 (2000) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0002011.
- [12] M. Billó, M. Frau, F. Fucito, A. Lerda, A. Liccardo, and I. Pesando, “Classical Gauge Instantons from Open Strings,” JHEP 0302 (2003) 045, arXiv:hep-th/0211250.
- [13] D.-E. Diaconescu and R. Entin, “A Nonrenormalization theorem for the d = 1, N=8 vector multiplet,” Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 8045–8052, arXiv:hep-th/9706059 [hep-th].
- [14] F. Ferrari, “Emergent Space in Matrix Theories,” to appear .
- [15] E. Witten, “On the conformal field theory of the Higgs branch,” JHEP 9707 (1997) 003, arXiv:hep-th/9707093 [hep-th].
- [16] S. R. Coleman, “,” in Aspects of Symmetry. Cambridge U. Press, 1985.
- [17] J. Zinn-Justin, “Vector Models in the Large Limit: a Few Applications,” arXiv:hep-th/9810198.
- [18] F. Ferrari, “Nonsupersymmetric Cousins of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories: Quantum Space of Parameters and Double Scaling Limits,” Phys. Lett. B496 (2000) 212–217, arXiv:hep-th/0003142.
- [19] F. Ferrari, “A Model for Gauge Theories with Higgs Fields,” JHEP 0106 (2001) 057, arXiv:hep-th/0102041.
- [20] F. Ferrari, “Large and Double Scaling Limits in Two-Dimensions,” JHEP 0205 (2002) 044, arXiv:hep-th/0202002.
- [21] R. Leigh, “Dirac-Born-Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,” Mod.Phys.Lett. A4 (1989) 2767.
- [22] M. R. Douglas, “Branes within branes,” arXiv:hep-th/9512077 [hep-th].
- [23] G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, “Black Strings and P-Branes,” Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 197–209.