1 Introduction

Discovery of the Extremely Energetic Supernova 2008fz


We report on the discovery and initial observations of the energetic type IIn supernova (SN), 2008fz. The optical energy emitted by SN 2008fz (based on the light curve over a 88 day period), is possibly the most ever observed for a supernova ( erg). The event was more luminous than the type IIn SN 2006gy, but exhibited same smooth, slowly evolving light curve. As is characteristic of type IIn SN, the early spectra of 2008fz initially exhibited narrow Balmer lines which were replaced by a broader component at later times. The spectra also show a blue continuum with no signs of Ca or Na absorption, suggesting that there is little extinction due to intragalatic dust in the host or circumstellar material. No host galaxy is identified in prior coadded images reaching . From the supernova’s redshift, , we place an upper limit on the host of . The presence of the SN within such a faint host follows the majority of recently discovered highly luminous SN. A possible reason for this occurrence is the very high star formation rate occurring in low-mass galaxies in combination with the low metallicity environment, which makes the production of very massive stars possible. We determine the peak absolute magnitude of the event to be from the initial photometry and the redshift distance, placing it among the most luminous supernovae discovered.

Subject headings:
supernovae: general — galaxies: stellar content — supernovae: individual (SN 2008fz)

1. Introduction

The recent discovery of highly energetic type IIn supernovae such as SN 2006gy (Quimby 2006; Smith et al. 2007) and type II-L SN 2005ap (Quimby et al. 2007) has stirred interest in the energy sources and fate of the most massive and luminous stars. The bulk of the energy expelled from a supernova is in the form of neutrinos (for a recent review see Haxton 2008). However, although experiments are underway to measure such neutrinos (Kowarik et al. 2009, Franckowiak et al. 2009), the amount of energy is not as readily measured for distant SN as is their optical emission. The amount of optical energy in the explosion of SN 2006gy was found to require a progenitor with mass and suggests either the explosion of a luminous blue variable (LBV) like Carinae, or the pair-instability destruction of a very massive, low metallicity star (Woosley et al. 2007; Ofek et al. 2007). Depending on their mass, pair-instability SNe are expected to either directly form a black hole or completely disintegrate as they undergo thermonuclear runaway (Heger & Woosley 2002). Such events are also of relevance for links between population III SNe and long-timescale GRBs (Stanek et al. 2003).

Recent direct evidence for the destruction of massive blue variable stars comes from an average luminosity type IIn SN, 2005gl. This event was first noted to be due to a Carinae-like star by Gal-Yam et al. (2007). Comparison of pre and post-explosion HST data shows the disappearance of progenitor with a luminosity consistent with a very massive star (Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009). Evidence for the pair-instability SN comes from the slow-evolving type Ic SN 2007bi discovered by the SNfactory (Nugent et al. 2007). This event was found to have a core mass of , placing it well within the most massive star regime (Gal-Yam et al. 2009). Other luminous type II SN, such as 2006tf, suggest there may be a transition between luminous type IIn events powered by interaction with CSM, to events where the opacity of the surrounding circumstellar material (CSM) confines the energy until it can diffuse out (Smith et al. 2008).

The brightest commonly observed population of core-collapse (CC) supernovae come from massive stars. Extremely luminous supernovae (hereafter ELSN) are more luminous than regular CC events which can range in peak from to with peak magnitudes vary widely depending on their type (Richardson et al. 2002) For the purposes of this paper we define ELSN as supernova that were brighter the at peak. This groups is made up of fewer than a dozen events discovered and confirmed in approximately as many years. The recent ELSN have all come from surveys covering large areas (rather than bright nearby galaxies), such as ROTSE (Quimby et al. 2007), the SNfactory (Gal-Yam et al. 2009) and CRTS (Drake et al. 2009a). In most cases these have been discovered in intrinsically faint galaxies. This is interesting as such low-mass galaxies tend to have the low metallicity (Forbes, Sánchez-Blázquez & Proctor 2005; Spolaor et al. 2009) which may favor the formation of the massive star progenitors to hypernovae (Heger et al. 2003). Hypernovae exhibit broad-line type Ic SN spectra (Sahu et al. 2009), and are believed to be linked to the long-timescale gamma-ray bursts during the deaths of massive stars (Paczynski 1997). Such GRBs are found in low-mass, low-metalicity star-forming galaxies (Fruchter et al. 2006; Woosley & Heger 2006). Some ELSN are found in the same environments as hypernovae, for example SN 2007bi was a bright broad-line type Ic in a faint low metalicity galaxy (Young et al. 2009). However, as with 2007bi, not all broad-line type Ic events have been associated with GRBs, nor do they all exhibit extremely luminosities. Additionally, low-mass galaxies appear to have much higher SN rates than expected for their baryonic content because of elevated star formation rate (Mannucci et al. 2005; Sullivan et al. 2006; Zheng et al 2007), although it is not known whether this extends to very faint galaxies.

2. Data Reduction and Discovery

The Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS; Drake et al. 2009a) is a synoptic optical survey which searches for transients in data taken by the Catalina Sky Survey (CSS; Larson et al. 2003). Results from the first six months of the CRTS survey appear in a recent paper by Drake et al. (2009a) which includes transients found in a repeatedly imaged region of . The initial survey is based solely on CSS Schmidt telescope observations, which cover 1200 squares degrees of the sky per night, four times, to a V magnitude of 20 with resolution. All data are automatically processed in real-time, and OT discoveries are immediately distributed publicly as VOEvents, HTML and RSS12.

As of July 2009 over a 850 unique optical transients13(OTs) have been discovered by searching for large variations between image epochs. These OTs include over hundred new cataclysmic variables (CVs), as well as dozens of Blazars, flare stars and high-proper motion (HPM) stars and more than 140 supernovae. The CRTS survey covers the sky irrespective of potential transient targets, unlike most current surveys for nearby supernovae which target between a few hundred and a few thousand bright nearby galaxies (KAIT/LOSS, Pucket/POSS, CHASE). However, as transient detection is performed using catalogs, CRTS is most efficient at discovering supernovae that are more luminous than their hosts. This biases detection toward the brightest SN, such as ELSN (e.g., SN 2006gy; Smith et al. 2007), and SNe in very faint galaxies (e.g., SN2009aq; Mahabal et al. 2009).

SN 2008fz was discovered by CRTS at (J2000) on September 22nd 2008 (Drake et al. 2008a). As with all CRTS transients, the object was rapidly classified based on existing data and placed on public webpages. Photometric follow-up was taken with the Palomar 1.5m on September 23rd. As there was no visible host galaxy the object was first classified as either a CV or SN (Drake et al. 2008b). A noisy spectrum was obtained September 23rd with the 1.82m Plaskett Telescope (range 390-703 nm, resolution 0.3 nm) and the transient was initially classified as a type Ic SN (Hsiao et al. 2008). We obtained second spectrum with the SMARTS 1.5m on September 27th. However, this also had a low signal-to-noise ratio and exhibited no features strong enough to classify it. The SN was independently rediscovered as a transient by the Palomar-Quest survey on September 29th and a third spectrum was obtained on October 1st with the Palomar 5m telescope and DBSP (Mahabal et al. 2008). Benetti et al. (2008) subsequently took a spectrogram on October 9th using the TNG 3.5m telescope and DOLORES (range 350-930 nm, resolution 1.3 nm), and reclassified the object as a type IIn SN at redshift based on narrow component of the Balmer lines, and obtained a synthetic luminosity of from the spectrum.

3. Photometry

The CSS observations of SN 2008fz were taken unfiltered. V-magnitudes are routinely derived from CSS photometry by calibrating each frame with between 10 and 100 G-dwarf stars in each field selected from 2MASS near-IR data14. The magnitudes are transformed to V following Bessell & Brett (1988). Scatter in calibrated stars is typically magnitudes (Larson et al. 2007).

We checked the calibration for SN 2008fz using the standard star GD 246. This star lies within a degree of 2008fz, has a V magnitude of (Landolt 2009). GD 246 was observed 16 times over four nights within minutes of observing of SN 2008fz. Being a hot star this white dwarf it is expected to have a colour more similar to the SN than the G-dwarfs used in routine calibration. The average CSS V-magnitude for GD 246 from the four overlapping nights is . The observed magnitudes are clearly in excellent agreement.

In order to determine the absolute V-band magnitude of 2008fz the CSS photometry was corrected for Galactic extinction of , as derived from Schlegel et al (1998) reddening maps. However, no correction was applied for intra-galaxy extinction within the host. We apply K-corrections to account for the effective rest-frame bandwidth of the redshifted supernovae (Oke & Sandage 1968). However, as SN 2006gy and 2008fz photometry were taken unfiltered, we do not apply corrections for the redshift of the SEDs. Such corrections are expected to be small because of the relatively flat flux distribution and low redshift of the SNe. The peak absolute magnitude is for redshift (), assuming km s Mpc and WMAP cosmology. Additional uncertainty is expected because of the unknown amount of intra-galaxy extinction.

4. Spectra

As noted above, a spectrum of 2008fz was obtained with the Palomar 5m on October 1st UT. Additional spectra were obtained on October 25th with the Modular Spectrograph (modspec) on the MDM 2.4m, and a later spectrum was obtained on June 22nd 2009 UT with the Palomar 5m telescope and DBSP (Oke & Gunn 1982). In Figure 1, we show spectra of SN 2008fz along with that of SN 2006gy at a similar age. The approximate time of 2008fz’s explosion was determined assuming the same rise time to maximum light as SN 2006gy. Therefore, this date uncertain by 10 days or more. A strong narrow component to the Balmer lines are observed in SN 2008fz at early times, firmly placing the redshift at . At later times the continuum has become flat with broad emission remaining as the only strong feature in the 4500 - 8000 range. The evolution of broad Balmer lines from initial narrow lines in type IIn supernovae is expected to be the sign of interaction with the CSM (Smith et al. 2009).

5. The Host Galaxy

In Figure 2 we present images showing a Palomar-Quest (PQ) coadd at a location of the SN and a September 23rd, Gunn-r, Palomar 1.5m observation of the SN. The PQ coadd is constructed from nine, 140-second, Johnson I-band exposures of the 1.2m Oschin Schmidt telescope taken on eight nights between August 31 2003 and September 24th 2006. The limiting magnitude is approximately 22.5. An R-band coadd image with a limiting magnitude of 22 also shows no sign of a host galaxy. Based on the SN redshift, the unseen host galaxy is fainter than .

A single DSS-2 image (DSS2-B) of this region appears to show a small elongated object at the location of SN 2008fz. This was suggested as a possible host (Drake et al. 2008a). However, close inspection of the image reveals an adjacent negative patch of similar size and shape, suggesting that this is simply a photographic artifact. PQ B-band coadds of similar depth show no such object.

6. Comparison with SN 2006gy

As noted earlier a number of highly luminous SNe have recently been discovered. These include highly luminous rapid declining events such as SN 2005ap (Quimby et al. 2007) and 2008es (Gezari et al. 2009), as well as energetic long-timescale events, such as SN 2006tf (Smith et al. 2008), SN 2007bi (Gal-Yam et al. 2009) and SN 2006gy (Smith et al. 2007). Among these discoveries, the most optically energetic known event is SN 2006gy (Miller et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2009).

In order to compare 2008fz with this event we transform the KAIT R-band proxy magnitudes given by Smith et al. (2007) to V. The KAIT photometry are corrected for the very high amount of extinction from SN 2006gy’s host galaxy (Smith et al. 2007), , and the line-of-sight Galactic extinction, . Such high extinction values are justified by the presence of a red continuum relative to typical type IIn supernovae as well as deep Na I D absorption lines. Smith et al (2007) assumed a standard extinction law when they derived the reddening for SN 2006gy. Under this same assumption, the V-band Galactic extinction from Schlegel et al (1998) gives a total V-band extinction of 2.1 magnitudes. As 2006gy is an unusual SN, and some of the extinction could be due to the CSM, it is not clear how accurate this assumption is. At peak magnitude Agnoletto et al. (2009) give the () colour of SN 2006gy as . We thus shift the KAIT values by the measured colour, while noting that, although the SN colour clearly evolves, both KAIT and CSS data are taken clear and not corrected for colour evolution of the SED. After transformation the KAIT light curve V-band peak is magnitudes brighter than measured by Agnoletto et al. (2009). This is well within the mag uncertainty of Agnoletto et al (2009). Early photometry data does not constrain the exact outburst time of 2008fz, other than that the SN was not visible three months prior to detection to a limit of . Based on the similarity of the lightcurve to 2006gy we assume the rise time is similar to this event. Additionally, in our analysis we only consider the photometric time span presented as the object became unobservable at later times on its decline. In Figure 3 we present the light curves of SN 2008fz in relation to the ELSN SN 2006gy (transformed KAIT photometry) and SN 2007bi (Gal Yam et al. 2009). For contrast we also display two supernovae with normal luminosity; the type IIn SN 1999E (Rigon et al. 2003), and the type Ia SN 1999ee (Stritzinger et al. 2002). Integrating the light curve in Figure 3 over the 88 days of photometric observations, correcting for time dilation (), and assuming zero bolometric correction, we calculate a total radiated energy of . Smith et al. (2007) found SN 2006gy radiated ergs for their full light curve. Over the same time window around maximum light we find that SN 2006gy radiated ergs.

Over the first 65 days from maximum light SN 2006gy declined at an average rate of whereas 2008fz declined (corrected for the time dilation stretch). The combined optical energy and decline rate results suggest that 2008fz was more energetic in its optical emission. A more exact luminosity and energy comparison between SN 2006gy and SN 2008fz is not possible without knowing the difference in wavelength response of KAIT and CSS. However, 2008fz is magnitudes more luminous than SN 2006gy at peak. As noted above, the peak luminosity of SN 2006gy is derived with a significant reddening correction. Although there is little sign of significant reddening from the host in the spectrum of SN 2008fz there may be additional extinction. The presence of such reddening would mean that absolute luminosity was underestimated, thus the gap in luminosity between 2006gy and 2008fz would broaden.

7. Results and Discussion

The supernova 2008fz, discovered by CRTS, is possibly the most optically energetic supernova ever discovered. Early and late time spectra clearly show it is a type IIn event at . Evidence suggests that this ELSN is significantly brighter than the previous type IIn record holder, SN 2006gy (Smith et al. 2007). However, SN 2008fz may not be the most luminous supernova since SN 2005ap had an unfiltered peak absolute magnitude of (Quimby et al. 2007). However, the V-band magnitude of Sn 2005ap would certainly be lower, and based on CSS data covering the supernova peak appears to have been fainter than SN 2008fz (Drake et al. 2009, in prep.). An additional quickly declining supernova, SN 2008es, appears to have had a similar peak magnitude to SN 2008fz (; Gezari et al. 2009, ; Miller et al 2008a). Additional confirmed ELSN have also been discovered by CRTS including two luminous type Ic supernova, 2008iu (Drake et al. 2009b) and the most luminous event, 2009de (Drake et al. 2009c). Both of these events are brighter than the type Ic proposed pair-instability supernova, 2007bi (Gal-Yam et al. 2009).

Additional probable ELSN discovered by CRTS include CSS081009:002151-163204 (Drake et al. 2008c). This object was spectroscopically observed by Silverman et al. (2008) and found to be a possible very luminous supernova or AGN at . Miller et al. (2008b) used SWIFT and PAIRITEL to rule out the AGN possibility. A 21st magnitude galaxy was later discovered in the SDSS database at photometric redshift . Based on CRTS and SWIFT photometry and a redshift of Silverman et al. (2008), the peak luminosity of this object was . Three other ELSN candidates have been discovered by CRTS but are yet to be spectroscopically confirmed.

The similarity of SN 2008fz to 2006gy suggests that there is a significant population of very bright, energetic supernovae. Prior imaging show that SN 2008fz must reside within a faint galaxy (). This kind of environment is expected for pair-instability supernovae with high-mass very low-metalicity progenitor stars (Woosley et al. 2007). However, much more work is required to test whether SN 2008fz could be a pair-instability supernova. In the case of SN 2006gy, the event occurred near the bulge or spheroid of the SO/a galaxy NGC 1260 (Bernardi et al. 2002), and although Ofek et al. (2007) noted that the galaxy is near solar metallicity, Smith et al. (2007) note the likely presence of ongoing star formation. It is also possible that SN 2006gy originated in an orbiting, low-metalicity dwarf galaxy lying behind NGC 1260. This would explain the high level of extinction observed. Alternately, both of these energetic SN could come from more massive versions of the luminous giant star that appears to be responsible for SN 2005gl (Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009).

The discovery of such optically energetic SNe in intrinsically faint, low-metalicity galaxies mirrors the discovery of long-timescale GRBs associated with SNe, in low-mass star-forming galaxies (Stanek et al. 2006; Savaglio et al. 2008). Under these simple considerations, these kinds of events could be linked. However, additional work is required to quantify the role selection biases.

We would like to thank the anonymous referee for their comments which helped significantly improve this paper. The CRTS survey is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under grants AST-0407448 and AST-0909182. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CNS-0540369. The PQ survey is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grants AST-0407448 and AST-0407297. The CSS survey is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNG05GF22G issued through the Science Mission Directorate Near-Earth Objects Observations Program. J.L.P. is supported by NSF grant AST-0707982. Support for M.C. is provided by Proyecto Basal PFB-06/2007, by FONDAP Centro de Astrofísica 15010003, and by a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship.
Figure 1.— Spectra of SN 2008fz at d, d and d after explosion, obtained with the Palomar 5m + DBSP MDM 2.4m +Modspec and Palomar 5m + DBSP, respectively. For comparison the d spectrum of SN 2006gy from Smith et al. (2009) is shown with a dotted line. The explosion date for 2008fz assumes the event has the same rise time as 2006gy.

Figure 2.— The Location of 2008fz. Left: Palomar Quest Survey Johnson I-filter coadd image at location of the supernova. Right: Palomar 1.52m Gunn-r follow-up image from September 23rd 2008 centered on SN 2008fz.
Figure 3.— Comparison of the absolute V magnitudes of SN 2008fz with ELSN and regular SN. Open circles, CSS magnitudes for 2008fz. Crosses, measurements of 2008fz made with the Palomar 1.5m. Triangles, KAIT pseudo-R magnitudes for SN 2006gy (Smith et al. 2007) transformed to V. Filled boxes, CSS V-band magnitudes for ELSN SN 2007bi (Gal-Yam et al. 2009). Open boxes, V-band magnitudes for the type Ia supernova 1999ee (Stritzinger et al. 2002). Large dots, V-band magnitudes for the type IIn supernova 1999E (Rigon et al. 2003).


  1. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, CA 91225, USA
  2. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, CA 91225, USA
  3. affiliation: Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University
  4. affiliation: Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101
  5. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, CA 91225, USA
  6. affiliation: Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, National Research Council of Canada
  7. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, CA 91225, USA
  8. affiliation: California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, CA 91225, USA
  9. affiliation: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Av. Vicuña Mackena 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Santiago, Chile
  10. affiliation: The University of Arizona, Department of Planetary Sciences, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 1629 E. University Blvd, Tucson AZ 85721, USA
  11. affiliation: The University of Arizona, Department of Planetary Sciences, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 1629 E. University Blvd, Tucson AZ 85721, USA
  12. VOEventNet, http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/ and SkyAlert, http://www.skyalert.org/
  13. http://nesssi.cacr.caltech.edu/catalina/Allns.html
  14. http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/explsup.html


  1. Benetti, S., et al. 2008, CBET, 1533, 1
  2. Bernardi, M., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2990
  3. Bessell M.S., & Brett, J.M., 1988, PASP, 1134
  4. Drake, A.J., et al. 2008a, CBET, 1524
  5. Drake, A.J., et al. 2008b, ATel, 1778
  6. Drake, A.J., et al. 2008c, ATel, 1823
  7. Drake, A.J., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 696, 870
  8. Drake, A.J., et al. 2009b, CBET, 1681
  9. Drake, A.J., et al. 2009c, CBET, 1766
  10. Richardson, D., et al. ApJ, 2002, 123, 745
  11. Forbes, Sanchez-Blazquez & Proctor, R. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 6
  12. Fraley, G. S., 1968, ApSS, 2, 96
  13. Franckowiak, A. et al. 2009, astro-ph 0909.0631
  14. Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 372
  15. Gal-Yam, A. & Leonard D.C. 2009, Nature, 458, 865
  16. Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2009, accepted, Nature.
  17. Gezari, S., 2009, ApJ, 690, 1313
  18. Haxton, W.C. 2008, astro-ph 0808.0735
  19. Heger, A., Fryer, C.L., Woosley, S.E., Langer, N., Hartmann, D.H. 2003, AJ, 591, 288
  20. Heger, A. & Woosley, S.E 2002, AJ, 567, 532
  21. Hsiao, E. Y., Graham, M. L., Pritchet, C. J., Balam, D. 2008, CBET, 1524
  22. Kowarik, T. et al. 2009, astro-ph 0908.0441
  23. Landolt, A., 2009, AJ, 137, 4186
  24. Mahabal, A. et al. 2009, CBET, 1713, 1
  25. Mannucci, F., et al. 2005, A&A, 433, 807
  26. Miller, A.A., et al. 2008a, astro-ph 0808.2193
  27. Miller, A.A., et al. 2008b, ATel, 1842
  28. Miller, A.A., et al. 2009, astro-ph 0906.2201
  29. Nugent, P.E., et al. 2007, CBET, 929, 1
  30. Ofek, E.O., et al. 2007, ApJL, 659, L13
  31. Oke, J.B., & Sandage, A. 1968, ApJ, 154, 21
  32. Oke, J.B., & Gunn, J.E. 1982, PASP, 94, 586
  33. Paczynski, B., 1997, atro-ph 9712123
  34. Quimby, R.M. 2006, CBET, 644, 1
  35. Quimby, R.M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 668, 99
  36. Rigon, L., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 191
  37. Savaglio, S., Glazebrook, K. & Le Borgne, D., 2008, astro-ph, 0803.2718
  38. Sahu, D. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 676
  39. Schlegel, D., et al., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  40. Silverman, J.M., et al. 2008, ATel, 1833
  41. Smith, N., et al., 2007, ApJ, 666, 1116
  42. Smith, N., et al., 2008, astro-ph 0804.0042v3
  43. Smith, N., et al., 2009, astro-ph 0906.2200v2
  44. Spolaor, M., Proctor, R.N., Forbes, D. A., & Couch, W.J. ApJ, 2009, 691
  45. Stanek, K.Z., et al., 2003, ApJL, 591, 17
  46. Stanek, K.Z., et al., 2006, AcA, 56, 333
  47. Stritzinger, M., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2100
  48. Sullivan, et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 868
  49. Williams, R., et al. 2008, ATel, 1856
  50. Woosley, S.E., Binnikov, S., Heger, A. 2007, Nature, 450, 390
  51. Young, D.R., et al. 2009, astro-ph 0910.2248v1
  52. Zheng, X.Z., et al., ApJ, 661, L41
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description