Discovery of strong Balmer line absorption in two luminous LoBAL quasars at
We present the discovery of strong Balmer line absorption in H to H in two luminous low-ionization broad absorption line quasars (LoBAL QSOs) at , with black hole masses around from near-IR spectroscopy. There are only two previously known quasars at showing Balmer line absorption. SDSS J1019+0225 shows blueshifted absorption by km s with an H rest-frame equivalent width of 13 Å. In SDSS J0859+4239 we find redshifted absorption by km s with an H rest-frame equivalent width of 7 Å. The redshifted absorption could indicate an inflow of high density gas onto the black hole, though we cannot rule out alternative interpretations. The Balmer line absorption in both objects appears to be saturated, indicating partial coverage of the background source by the absorber. We estimate the covering fractions and optical depth of the absorber and derive neutral hydrogen column densities, cm for SDSS J1019+0225 and cm for SDSS J0859+4239 . In addition, the optical spectra reveal also absorption troughs in He i and in both objects.
Subject headings:Galaxies: active - Galaxies: nuclei - quasars: general
Broad Absorption Line quasars (BAL QSOs) represent an important sub-population of the AGN phenomenon. They show absorption lines in their rest-frame UV-lines with velocity widths km s which are usually blueshifted with velocities up to (Foltz et al., 1983; Weymann et al., 1991). The BAL absorption troughs indicate the presence of energetic outflows in these systems, possibly launched from the accretion disk (Murray et al., 1995). Powerful AGN outflows have been suggested to have a profound impact on their host galaxies by regulating and potentially quenching its star formation (Silk & Rees, 1998; Fabian, 2012; Zubovas & King, 2012). However, observationally the role, ubiquity and impact of AGN outflows is still poorly understood. BAL QSOs may provide a useful probe to constrain the AGN outflow mechanism.
In optically selected samples the BAL fraction is % (Hewett & Foltz, 2003; Gibson et al., 2009), but their intrinsic fraction is likely higher (Urrutia et al., 2009; Allen et al., 2011; Maddox et al., 2012). Narrower absorption features are also seen even more commonly in the UV-lines of quasars, which are classified based on their full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) as either narrow absorption lines (NAL, FWHM km s) or mini-BALs ( km s, Hamann et al., 1997; Vestergaard, 2003; Misawa et al., 2007).
The BALs are most commonly observed only in high-ionization lines such as C iv and Si iv in which case the AGN are called high-ionization broad absorption line quasars (HiBALs). Less common (%) are low-ionization broad absorption line quasars (LoBALs), which in addition also show absorption in low-ionization lines like Mg ii and Al iii. For both BAL QSO populations, both an orientation scenario and an evolution scenario have been proposed. HiBAL QSOs are commonly explained with an orientation scenario (Weymann et al., 1991; Ogle et al., 1999; Gallagher et al., 2007), while a pure orientation effect is not sufficient to explain in particular observations for the radio-loud BAL QSO population (e.g. Bruni et al., 2012; DiPompeo et al., 2012, 2013). For LoBALs more frequently an evolution scenario is advocated (Boroson & Meyers, 1992; Voit et al., 1993), in which they constitute an early, short-lived transition phase of AGN activity, with observational support for (Boroson & Meyers, 1992; Canalizo & Stockton, 2002; Farrah et al., 2007) and against this scenario (Lazarova et al., 2012; Violino et al., 2016; Schulze et al., 2017). The evolution scenario has been most strongly argued for the rare sub-population within the LoBAL class of FeLoBALs, which in addition also show absorption troughs in the metastable Fe ii line (Hazard et al., 1987; Becker et al., 1997; Hall et al., 2002).
Note. – The magnitudes are given in AB magnitudes in the SDSS system, the magnitudes are Vega-magnitudes in the 2MASS system and the magnitudes are Vega magnitudes in the WISE system.
Currently, the rarest case of absorption features in BALs is absorption in their Balmer lines, with only 11 cases reported to date, of which only two are known at (Hutchings et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2002; Aoki et al., 2006; Hall, 2007; Wang et al., 2008; Aoki, 2010; Ji et al., 2012, 2013; Wang & Xu, 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Mudd et al., 2017). The existence of Balmer absorption requires a high number density of level hydrogen atoms, which might be caused by Ly trapping (Hall, 2007). The physical conditions for this to happen are presumably rare, leading to the observed rarity of Balmer absorption lines in AGN.
We here present the discovery of two luminous LoBAL QSOs at which show strong Balmer absorption features in their near-IR spectra, namely SDSS J085910.40+423911.3 and SDSS J101927.37+022521.4, hereafter SDSS J0859+4239 and SDSS J1019+0225. Both objects have been observed as part of the sample presented in Schulze et al. (2017) (hereafter S17). In S17 we obtained near-IR spectroscopy, covering H, H and H, for a sample of 12 LoBAL QSOs at and 10 at . The targets were selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) quasar catalog (Schneider et al., 2010), showing continuous broad absorption in Mg ii or Al iii as measured by Allen et al. (2011) using the balnicity index (BI; Weymann et al., 1991). We identified the two Balmer absorption systems within these objects.
Throughout this paper we assume a Hubble constant of km s Mpc and cosmological density parameters and .
Both SDSS J0859+4239 and SDSS J1019+0225 have been observed with the near-IR spectrograph TripleSpec (Wilson et al., 2004) at the Palomar Hale 200 inch telescope in January 2014 with an exposure time of 60 min each. TripleSpec provides simultaneous coverage from 1.0 m to 2.4 m at a spectral resolution of R and uses a slit width of 1″. The data reduction is carried out using the modified IDL-based Spextool3 package (Cushing et al., 2004), and is described in more detail in S17 (see also Zuo et al., 2015).
Optical spectroscopy comes originally from SDSS DR7 (Abazajian et al., 2009). For SDSS J0859+4239 we use a more recent eBOSS spectrum from SDSS DR14 (Abolfathi et al., 2017), which extends to longer wavelengths. This spectrum is consistent with the older SDSS spectrum, indicating no strong spectral variability over the time span of 14 years from Jan. 2002 to Dec. 2015.
Furthermore, we utilize information on the broad band spectral energy distribution (SED) from the UV to the mid-infrared, based on photometry in the optical bands from SDSS (Schneider et al., 2010), near-infrared in the bands from 2MASS (Skrutskie et al., 2006) and mid-IR from the all-sky Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE; Wright et al., 2010; Lang et al., 2016) mission at and m respectively. We provide the multi-band photometry for our two objects in Table 1.
The H and H spectral regions obtained from the near-IR spectra are shown in the upper panels in Fig. 1 for SDSS J1019+0225 and in Fig. 2 for SDSS J0859+4239. Both objects show the clear presence of absorption troughs in their Balmer lines. We also see tentative evidence for Balmer absorption in H, though at low significance.
We have fitted the wavelength regions around H and H with a multi-component spectral model, as discussed in more detail in S17. In short, we fit a local power-law continuum, an optical iron template (Boroson & Green, 1992) for the H region and a set of Gaussian components for the broad Balmer lines, two Gaussian components for the [O iii] lines and single Gaussians for the narrow Balmer lines, [N ii] and [S ii] . For SDSS J1019+0225 and for H in SDSS J0859+4239 we have masked out the spectral range of the Balmer absorption, while for H in SDSS J0859+4239 we included it in our spectral model as a single Gaussian absorption line. The redshift of the objects is derived from the peak flux in the [O iii] line.
In the lower panels of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 we present the spectra normalized to this spectral model fit in velocity space as gray line, which shows the normalized absorption trough in respect to the broad line and continuum emission. To further highlight the absorption feature, we show as black solid line the normalized spectra smoothed by an uniform filter, computing the local mean over an uniform kernel of Å and Å rest-frame width for SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239, respectively. We perform our measurements of the absorption trough based on this smoothed spectrum. We have also explored smoothing with a Gaussian filter and found consistent results.
In particular, we used this smoothed spectrum to measure the velocity and absorption depth of the peak position of the absorption trough. Furthermore, we measure FWHM (corrected for instrumental broadening) the rest-frame equivalent width (EW) in respect to the continuum+broad emission line and the minimum and maximum velocity. The latter two are defined as the location in velocity space where the normalized flux falls below 95%. The EW is measured over the velocity region between the minimum and maximum velocity. The absorption trough measurements are listed in Table 2.
Uncertainties on the absorption trough measurements are derived via Monte Carlo simulations. For each spectrum we generate 100 simulated spectra by adding Gaussian random noise to the spectra, with the standard deviation at each pixel taken from the flux error. For each simulated spectrum we carry out the same measurements as for the real spectrum, including model fitting, normalizing, smoothing and absorption trough measurements. The uncertainties are then taken as the 1 dispersion from those measurments.
We note that both objects have strong [O iii] emission, with EWÅ and 80Å for SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239, respectively. LoBAL QSOs are traditionally thought to show very weak [O iii] emission (Boroson & Meyers, 1992), like the greater population of BAL QSOs (Yuan & Wills, 2003). Conversely, Balmer absorption QSOs often have strong [O iii] emission lines (Aoki et al., 2006; Hall, 2007). However, in S17 we showed that at least our LoBAL QSO sample at shows a broad range of [O iii] equivalent widths, consistent with the general quasar population. Balmer absorption QSOs with weak [O iii] have also been found (Ji et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). This suggests that normal LoBALs and Balmer absorption line LoBALs do not have clearly separated [O iii] equivalent width distributions, as early observations suggested, but likely overlap in their [O iii] properties. Nevertheless we note that our two Balmer absorption line cases posses the strongest [O iii] emission among our sample in S17, which might indicate that LoBAL QSOs with Balmer absorption line systems show on average higher [O iii] equivalent width than the general LoBAL QSO population. Larger Balmer absorption line AGN samples are required to robustly test this trend.
Both objects also do not show prominent iron emission in their rest-frame optical, given the data quality of our near-IR spectra. This is consistent with the on average weak iron emission seen for the full LoBAL QSO sample in S17, but in contrast to the typically strong iron emission in LoBAL QSOs at .
We next discuss the two individual Balmer absorption line LoBAL QSOs in more detail.
3.1. Sdss J1019+0225
SDSS J1019+0225 is a LoBAL with Mg ii Balnicity of 4648 km s (Allen et al., 2011), located at redshift (S17, based on [O iii] and fully consistent with [O ii]). It has a black hole mass and Eddington ratio of and , as obtained in S17 from the broad H line111Note that black hole mass estimates using the virial method as done here likely have a systematic uncertainty of dex..
SDSS J1019+0225 is detected in the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty Centimeters (FIRST; Becker et al., 1995) survey. It is originally classified as radio loud, with a radio-loudness parameter (Shen et al., 2011). However, this value is affected by the significant reddening of the spectrum. To account for this we use the less affected flux at 5100Å and estimate by assuming a ratio , based on the quasar template from (Shen, 2016). This gives , i.e. using the common definition of a radio loud QSO of (Kellermann et al., 1989), SDSS J1019+0225 is just above the boundary to be classified as radio loud. We note that radio loud QSOs show on average stronger [O iii] emission than matched radio quiet QSOs (e.g. Schulze et al., 2017b), consistent with the relatively strong [O iii] emission observed in SDSS J1019+0225. On the other hand, small samples of radio loud BAL QSOs found typically week [O iii] emission (Runnoe et al., 2013).
Note. – The velocity is defined as negative for lines that are blueshifted from the quasar.
The presence of an asymmetric absorption profile is visible in both the broad H and H emission line, however the S/N in H is rather poor. The trough in H is blueshifted by km s and has an EWÅ. This is the strongest Balmer absorption feature currently known at . The FWHM of the Balmer absorption trough is km s, making SDSS J1019+0225 a mini-BAL in its Balmer lines.
The Balmer absorption is intrinsic to the quasar and not due to a post-starburst feature in its host galaxy. Post-starburst features in quasars are not uncommon (Brotherton et al., 1999; Cales et al., 2013) and have also recently been observed in a LoBAL QSO (Mudd et al., 2017). However, the Balmer absorption in this system is clearly stronger that the stellar continuum emission (which is subdominant to the total continuum emission in this luminous quasar) and thus cannot be stellar absorption. Furthermore, Balmer absorption in post-starburst quasars is usually not blueshifted in respect to the [O iii] and [O ii] emission. Post-starburst quasars also show a strong Balmer break, which for SDSS J1019+0225 however falls into an observed wavelength range strongly affected by atmospheric absorption.
3.2. Sdss J0859+4239
SDSS J0859+4239 has a redshift of (also based on [O iii] and fully consistent with [O ii]) and a Mg ii Balnicity of 5212 km s (Allen et al., 2011). Its black hole mass and Eddington ratio are and , respectively (S17). It is also detected in FIRST with ( in Shen et al., 2011), i.e. it is classified as radio quiet after correcting for dust reddening.
SDSS J0859+4239 shows a strong, rather unique Balmer absorption feature. The trough has a EWÅ, comparable to the Balmer absorption LoBAL discovered by Aoki et al. (2006). However, unlike almost all other Balmer absorption features the trough in SDSS J0859+4239 is redshifted instead of blueshifted, by km s in respect to the [O iii] and [O ii] redshift. Most Balmer absorption systems are blueshifted up to 5000-10000 km s from its emission redshift (Zhang et al., 2015), indicative of a fast outflowing wind. The only redshifted Balmer absorption system reported yet is SDSS J112526.12+002901.3 (Hall et al., 2002; Shi et al., 2016), showing absorption lines redshifted up to 650 km s from the systemic redshift in the Balmer lines and He i. Shi et al. (2016) proposed this absorption system as a candidate for accretion inflow which originates from the inner surface of the torus. Until now observational evidence for strong gas inflows in AGN on physical scales within the torus is scarce. If the Balmer absorption in SDSS J0859+4239 is indeed associated with a gas inflow onto the central black hole, which is seen along our line of sight, this would support the idea proposed by Shi et al. (2016) and provide a unique case to study the fueling of supermassive black holes. Alternative explanations for or contributions to redshifted absorption systems are a rotation-dominated disk wind or gravitational redshift (Hall et al., 2002, 2013). Possible ways to discriminate between these scenarios are variability or constraining the location of the absorption system (see also section 4.3).
We classify the Balmer absorption system in SDSS J0859+4239 as a mini-BAL, given its FWHM of 783 km s in H. As for SDSS J1019+0225, we argue that the absorption feature is intrinsic and not indicative of a post-starburst feature for the same reasons as above. The absorption in both H and H is deeper than the height of the continuum level, which already excludes an origin in the AGN host galaxy.
3.3. SED and Reddening
LoBAL QSOs typically are strongly reddened, with a dust extinction of (Sprayberry & Foltz, 1992; Gibson et al., 2009). This is also the case for our two Balmer absorption LoBALs, as seen from their SED, shown in Fig. 3. We construct the SED for the two objects, based on the multi-band photometry given in Table 1, as explained in S17, and normalized them to -band. In addition, we show the AGN SED template from Richards et al. (2006) and the median SED for a sample of normal quasars matched to our LoBAL sample in S17 as the purple dashed line and black solid line respectively.
Similar to our results in S17 for the full LoBAL sample, we find the rest frame mid-IR to optical SED consistent with that of normal quasars, while the rest frame UV is strongly affected by reddening. Assuming SMC-like dust extinction we find and for SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239 respectively, by matching the un-reddened SED to the SED of normal quasars.
In addition, we also estimate the dust reddening from the optical and near-IR spectrum, by correcting for SMC-like dust extinction until achieving an approximate match to an unreddened AGN template. We use the quasar composite spectrum from Shen (2016), which is derived for a comparable luminosity and redshift range. We also tested the SDSS quasar composite spectrum from Vanden Berk et al. (2001), finding consistent results. We estimate dust extinction values from the spectra of and for SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239 respectively. The former is larger than the value estimated from the full SED, while the latter is fully consistent with this estimate.
4.1. Absorption in the rest-frame UV lines
Both objects show complex absorption systems from multiple lines in their rest-frame UV spectra, as shown in Fig. 4. We show the SDSS DR7 spectrum for SDSS J1019+0225 and a more recent SDSS DR14 spectrum for SDSS J0859+4239. We have indicated the position of several prominent AGN emission lines, based on the [O iii] redshift. We identify complex absorption troughs from Mg ii, Al iii and He i. Furthermore, we see strong [O ii] emission in both cases and a prominent Ne v line in SDSS J1019+0225.
Absorption in the He i line has been thought to be a rare phenomenon (Rudy et al., 1985; Hall et al., 2002; Leighly et al., 2011). However, the systematic study by Liu et al. (2015) suggested associated He i absorption to be common among LoBAL QSOs, with an observed fraction % for SDSS quasars with high S/N spectra. He i lines originate from the metastable triplet level caused by recombination of He ii, with their strongest transitions at 10830, 3889, and 3189Å. He i absorption can be a powerful tool to probe the physical conditions and geometry of the (outflowing) absorber (Leighly et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2015). It has been detected in the majority of the currently known Balmer absorption line AGN (Zhang et al., 2015). We detect both He i and He i absorption troughs in the optical SDSS/eBOSS spectra for both objects.
In Fig. 5 we compare the absorption features of several lines from rest-frame UV to optical with each other in velocity space, using the [O iii] line for the systemic redshift. The He i absorption at both Å and Å is in broad agreement with the H absorption. In SDSS J0859+4239 we see tentative evidence for two absorption features, one blueshifted and one slightly redshifted, where the former one is weaker in H. However, in He i both appear to be equally strong, while in He i the blueshifted component is even stronger. Higher S/N observations would be required to robustly establish this line profile behavior.
The troughs in Mg ii and Al iii broadly agree as well in their velocity offset, but are much stronger and broader than the absorption in the Balmer and He i lines. Both objects have a high balnicity in Mg ii, BI km s (Allen et al., 2011). The balnicity in Al iii for SDSS J0859+4239 is km s, while they did not detect an Al iii BAL in SDSS J1019+0225, probably due to the low S/N in the SDSS spectrum. Overall the velocity offset of the absorption troughs in the optical Balmer lines and the UV low-ionization lines are comparable, while we see indications for differences in their line profiles. Higher quality spectra would be required for a better characterization of in particular the He i line profile. A robust comparison of the line profiles of these absorption systems would provide better constraints on the structure (e.g possible stratification) and physical conditions of the outflowing/inflowing gas.
In the bottom panel of Fig. 4 we show in addition a BOSS spectrum (taken in 2010) for SDSS J083942.11+380526.3 (hereafter SDSS J0839+3805), the first high- Balmer absorption quasar discovered (Aoki et al., 2006). Interestingly, we find a close resemblance in the rest-frame UV spectra between SDSS J0839+3805 and SDSS J0859+4239. This might indicate similar physical conditions of the absorbing gas in both objects. SDSS J0839+3805 does show H absorption with a rest equivalent width of 8 Å, comparable to SDSS J0859+4239, and a blueshift of 520 km s, while the absorption feature in SDSS J0859+4239 is redshifted by about the same amount. Since SDSS J0839+3805 is at , its BOSS spectrum does not cover the He i lines, but Aoki et al. (2006) report a tentative discovery of He i in their -band spectrum, though at low significance.
Note. – Derived physical properties of the absorber, as discussed in section 4.2, using two different scenarios for the coverage of the absorber. The coverage fraction and H optical depth are derived based on equations 1-4. The total column density of H i gas in the level is computed by integrating Equation 5. We use this, together with the optical depth of Ly and the ratio between the to shell population (based on equations 6 and 7) to estimate the total hydrogen column density .
4.2. Hydrogen column density
Our near-IR spectroscopy of the Balmer absorption system allows to derive an estimate of the hydrogen column density of the absorber in both SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239. A significant caveat here is the poor S/N detection of the H absorption. We use the smoothed absorption profiles shown in the bottom panels of Fig. 1 and 2, but point out that higher quality spectra would be crucial for a more robust estimate.
Under the assumption of full coverage by the absorber along our line of sight to the background flux source the ratio of absorption depths at the centers of the H and H lines should be close to the ratio of their oscillator strengths, (Zhang et al., 2015). However, our observations suggest a much smaller ratio, rather close to one. The most likely explanation is that the absorption lines are saturated and the covering factor, i.e. the fraction of flux covered by the foreground absorber, is smaller than one.222Possible alternative scenarios to explain such a deviation from the expected optical depth scaling have been discussed by Ganguly et al. (1999), but these are less likely.. Thus the H absorber does not fully cover the continuum source and the Broad emission line region (BELR). It might either cover only one of them fully, one fully and one partially, or both of them partially. Most likely the H absorber covers at least the BELR partially because its absorption depth is larger than the continuum flux at that wavelength in both objects. An estimate of the covering factor can be derived from comparing the absorption depths of several lines with simple models (Zhang et al., 2015).
We here follow this approach and specifically test two plausible scenarios for the partial coverage of the absorber of BELR and continuum disk emission: (I) the absorber covers the BELR and continuum source with the same covering factor; and (II) the absorber covers the continuum source fully (covering factor of one), but the BELR only partially. These two scenarios should approximately span the possible range of partial coverage for our sources.
For scenario (I), the effective coverage fraction can be computed from the normalized residual intensity in the trough, when observed in multiple lines (Barlow & Sargent, 1997; Hamann et al., 1997; Ganguly et al., 1999). The intensity is given by:
where is the effective optical depth of an absorbing cloud, covering a fraction of the background source. For the two transitions of H and H, can be derived via solving the relation:
where and are the rest-wavelengths of H and H and and are their oscillator strengths. The optical depth is then determined via Equation 1.
where is the coverage fraction of the continuum source, in this case would be the coverage fraction towards the BELR and is the ratio of the broad emission line flux to the continuum flux, each derived from our best fit model. For multiple transitions the following equation has to be solved to determine :
Again, is then computed via Equation 3. We determine coverage fraction and H optical depth for both scenarios from above equations for every velocity element from the smoothed absorption troughs. Their values at the velocity of the absorption peak are listed in Table 3 for our two objects.
We calculate the total column density of H i gas in the level in the absorbing cloud by integrating Equation 5. We obtain values of cm for SDSS J1019+0225 and cm for SDSS J0859+4239 for the two scenarios (I) and (II), as listed in Table 3.
where is the oscillator strength of Ly and and are the population of levels and , respectively. Due to Ly trapping the level population is increased by a factor from the thermal equilibrium. The ratio of the to shell is then (Hall, 2007)
We assume K, as appropriate for partially ionized gas illuminated by a quasar (Osterbrock & Ferland, 2006), to derive , and the total hydrogen column density for our two objects and both scenarios. The results are given in Table 3. We find cm for SDSS J1019+0225 and cm for SDSS J0859+4239, using our results from scenario (I) and (II) to approximately bracket the possible range of .
4.3. Locating the origin of Balmer absorption lines
Balmer absorption lines originate in low or partially-ionized and high-density regions. The low ionization ensures a large amount of neutral hydrogen to be present. For high-density regions ( cm) then the optical depth for Ly is so large that Ly pumping (Ferland & Netzer, 1979) is important, which keeps a large number of excited level () hydrogen atoms (Hall, 2007). This indicates the absorber is located very close to the central engine, typically on scales between the dust torus and the BELR (Hall, 2007; Zhang et al., 2015). Hutchings et al. (2002) observed NGC4151 (a nearby Sy1 galaxy) and proposed that Balmer and He i absorption lines originate around the edge of the obscuring torus that is eroded and accelerated by the nuclear flux. Zhang et al. (2015) and Shi et al. (2016) also studied the Balmer absorbers of low- quasars at and confirmed their distances from the central engine are larger than the size of the BELR but smaller than the size of the dusty torus based on detailed photoionization models using CLOUDY (Ferland et al., 1998). These results suggest that outflow winds with the right physical conditions to produce Balmer absorption are most likely located just outside of the BELR. However, it has not been confirmed yet whether this geometry is also applicable to high- quasars.
The two Balmer absorption LoBAL quasars presented here offer the potential to address this question directly. A detailed characterization of the multiple absorption lines detected in both the optical and near-IR in combination with careful photoionization modeling using CLOUDY is able to provide robust estimates of the hydrogen column density, optical depth and covering factor as well as the electron density, ionization parameter and location of the absorber. However, both the quality of the optical and the near-IR spectra presented here are, while being sufficient for detection, not sufficient for such a detailed modeling. Future, high S/N and high resolution spectroscopy will be required to derive these quantities.
We here present the discovery of two new cases of Balmer absorption lines in quasars from near-IR spectroscopy with Triplespec/Palomar. Balmer absorption troughs are currently rarely seen in quasar spectra. This suggests that the necessary physical conditions for such absorption to be present do rarely occur. This might be due to an orientation effect, where only a limited range of lines of sight allow the observation of Balmer absorption , but we are unable to rule out other explanations. The two new cases of Balmer absorption lines, SDSS J1019+0225 and SDSS J0859+4239, are both luminous LoBAL QSOs at , doubling the number of known Balmer absorption line quasars at . We detect absorption in H, H, tentatively in H, as well as in He i at and , in addition to BAL absorption in Mg ii and Al iii. The Balmer absorption in SDSS J0859+4239 is redshifted by km s, with respect to the [O iii] redshift, potentially indicating an inflow of high density gas onto the black hole. We estimated the neutral hydrogen column densities, cm for SDSS J1019+0225 and cm for SDSS J0859+4239.
While from the current data we are not able to constrain the location of the absorber, it is expected that it is located on small scales, roughly between the BELR and the dusty torus (Hall, 2007; Zhang et al., 2015). Higher S/N and higher resolution data will be required to better constrain the physical conditions of the outflowing/inflowing absorber and their location for our two sources via photoionization modeling.
- Abazajian et al. (2009) Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543-558
- Abolfathi et al. (2017) Abolfathi, B., Aguado, D. S., Aguilar, G., et al. 2017, arXiv:1707.09322
- Allen et al. (2011) Allen, J. T., Hewett, P. C., Maddox, N., Richards, G. T., & Belokurov, V. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 860
- Aoki et al. (2006) Aoki, K., Iwata, I., Ohta, K., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 84
- Aoki (2010) Aoki, K. 2010, PASJ, 62, 1333
- Arav et al. (2001) Arav, N., de Kool, M., Korista, K. T., et al. 2001, ApJ, 561, 118
- Barlow & Sargent (1997) Barlow, T. A., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997, AJ, 113, 136
- Becker et al. (1995) Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
- Becker et al. (1997) Becker, R. H., Gregg, M. D., Hook, I. M., et al. 1997, ApJ, 479, L93
- Becker et al. (2000) Becker, R. H., White, R. L., Gregg, M. D., et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 72
- Boroson & Green (1992) Boroson, T. A., & Green, R. F. 1992, ApJS, 80, 109
- Boroson & Meyers (1992) Boroson, T. A., & Meyers, K. A. 1992, ApJ, 397, 442
- Brotherton et al. (1999) Brotherton, M. S., van Breugel, W., Stanford, S. A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 520, L87
- Bruni et al. (2012) Bruni, G., Mack, K.-H., Salerno, E., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A13
- Bruni et al. (2014) Bruni, G., González-Serrano, J. I., Pedani, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A87
- Cales et al. (2013) Cales, S. L., Brotherton, M. S., Shang, Z., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 90
- Canalizo & Stockton (2002) Canalizo, G., & Stockton, A. 2002, Mass Outflow in Active Galactic Nuclei: New Perspectives, 255, 195
- Cushing et al. (2004) Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362
- DiPompeo et al. (2012) DiPompeo, M. A., Brotherton, M. S., & De Breuck, C. 2012, ApJ, 752, 6
- DiPompeo et al. (2013) DiPompeo, M. A., Brotherton, M. S., & De Breuck, C. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1565
- Fabian (2012) Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455
- Farrah et al. (2007) Farrah, D., Lacy, M., Priddey, R., Borys, C., & Afonso, J. 2007, ApJ, 662, L59
- Ferland & Netzer (1979) Ferland, G., & Netzer, H. 1979, ApJ, 229, 274
- Ferland et al. (1998) Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761
- Foltz et al. (1983) Foltz, C., Wilkes, B., Weymann, R., & Turnshek, D. 1983, PASP, 95, 341
- Gallagher et al. (2007) Gallagher, S. C., Hines, D. C., Blaylock, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 157
- Ganguly et al. (1999) Ganguly, R., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Churchill, C. W. 1999, AJ, 117, 2594
- Gibson et al. (2009) Gibson, R. R., Jiang, L., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 758
- Hall et al. (2002) Hall, P. B., Anderson, S. F., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 141, 267
- Hall (2007) Hall, P. B. 2007, AJ, 133, 1271
- Hall et al. (2013) Hall, P. B., Brandt, W. N., Petitjean, P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 222
- Hamann et al. (1997) Hamann, F., Barlow, T. A., Junkkarinen, V., & Burbidge, E. M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 80
- Hazard et al. (1987) Hazard, C., McMahon, R. G., Webb, J. K., & Morton, D. C. 1987, ApJ, 323, 263
- Hewett & Foltz (2003) Hewett, P. C., & Foltz, C. B. 2003, AJ, 125, 1784
- Hutchings et al. (2002) Hutchings, J. B., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2543
- Ji et al. (2012) Ji, T., Wang, T.-G., Zhou, H.-Y., & Wang, H.-Y. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 369
- Ji et al. (2013) Ji, T., Zhou, H.-y., Wang, T.-g., & Wang, H.-y. 2013, Chinese Astron. Astrophys., 37, 17
- Kellermann et al. (1989) Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., & Green, R. 1989, AJ, 98, 1195
- Lang et al. (2016) Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., & Schlegel, D. J. 2016, AJ, 151, 36
- Lazarova et al. (2012) Lazarova, M. S., Canalizo, G., Lacy, M., & Sajina, A. 2012, ApJ, 755, 29
- Leighly et al. (2011) Leighly, K. M., Dietrich, M., & Barber, S. 2011, ApJ, 728, 94
- Liu et al. (2015) Liu, W.-J., Zhou, H., Ji, T., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 11
- Maddox et al. (2012) Maddox, N., Hewett, P. C., Péroux, C., Nestor, D. B., & Wisotzki, L. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2876
- Misawa et al. (2007) Misawa, T., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Kashikawa, N. 2007, ApJ, 660, 152
- Mudd et al. (2017) Mudd, D., Martini, P., Tie, S. S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3682
- Murray et al. (1995) Murray, N., Chiang, J., Grossman, S. A., & Voit, G. M. 1995, ApJ, 451, 498
- Ogle et al. (1999) Ogle, P. M., Cohen, M. H., Miller, J. S., et al. 1999, ApJS, 125, 1
- Osterbrock & Ferland (2006) Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei, 2nd. ed. by D.E. Osterbrock and G.J. Ferland. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 2006,
- Richards et al. (2006) Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470
- Rudy et al. (1985) Rudy, R. J., Stocke, J. T., & Foltz, C. B. 1985, ApJ, 288, 531
- Runnoe et al. (2013) Runnoe, J. C., Ganguly, R., Brotherton, M. S., & DiPompeo, M. A. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1778
- Schneider et al. (2010) Schneider, D. P., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2360
- Schulze et al. (2017) Schulze, A., Schramm, M., Zuo, W., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 104
- Schulze et al. (2017b) Schulze, A., Done, C., Lu, Y., Zhang, F., & Inoue, Y. 2017, ApJ, 849, 4
- Shen et al. (2011) Shen, Y., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 45
- Shen (2016) Shen, Y. 2016, ApJ, 817, 55
- Shi et al. (2016) Shi, X.-H., Jiang, P., Wang, H.-Y., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 96
- Silk & Rees (1998) Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1
- Skrutskie et al. (2006) Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163
- Sprayberry & Foltz (1992) Sprayberry, D., & Foltz, C. B. 1992, ApJ, 390, 39
- Urrutia et al. (2009) Urrutia, T., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1095
- Vanden Berk et al. (2001) Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549
- Vestergaard (2003) Vestergaard, M. 2003, ApJ, 599, 116
- Violino et al. (2016) Violino, G., Coppin, K. E. K., Stevens, J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1371
- Voit et al. (1993) Voit, G. M., Weymann, R. J., & Korista, K. T. 1993, ApJ, 413, 95
- Wang et al. (2008) Wang, T., Dai, H., & Zhou, H. 2008, ApJ, 674, 668-675
- Wang & Xu (2015) Wang, J., & Xu, D. W. 2015, A&A, 573, A15
- Weymann et al. (1991) Weymann, R. J., Morris, S. L., Foltz, C. B., & Hewett, P. C. 1991, ApJ, 373, 23
- Wilson et al. (2004) Wilson, J. C., Henderson, C. P., Herter, T. L., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5492, 1295
- Wright et al. (2010) Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868-1881
- Yuan & Wills (2003) Yuan, M. J., & Wills, B. J. 2003, ApJ, 593, L11
- Zhang et al. (2015) Zhang, S., Zhou, H., Shi, X., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 113
- Zubovas & King (2012) Zubovas, K., & King, A. 2012, ApJ, 745, L34
- Zuo et al. (2015) Zuo, W., Wu, X.-B., Fan, X., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 189