Directly pumped 10 GHz microcomb modules from low-power diode lasers

Directly pumped 10 GHz microcomb modules from low-power diode lasers

Myoung-Gyun Suh, Christine Y. Wang, Cort Johnson, and Kerry Vahala
T. J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Charles Stark Draper Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Corresponding author:

Soliton microcombs offer the prospect of advanced optical metrology and timing systems in compact form factors. In these applications, pumping of microcombs directly from a semiconductor laser without amplification or triggering components is desirable for reduced power operation and to simplify system design. At the same time, low repetition rate microcombs are required in many comb applications for interface to detectors and electronics, but their increased mode volume makes them challenging to pump at low power. Here, 10 GHz repetition rate soliton microcombs are directly pumped by low-power ( 20 mW) diode lasers. High-Q silica microresonators are used for this low power operation and are packaged into fiber-connectorized modules that feature temperature control for improved long-term frequency stability.

Optical frequency combs (OFCs) have revolutionized a wide range of applications diddams2010evolving () and in recent years a miniature frequency comb or microcomb has been demonstrated using compact (often chip-based) microresonators kippenberg2018dissipative (). These devices use the optical Kerr effect to induce soliton mode locking from a continuous-wave optical pump herr2014temporal (); brasch2016photonic (); yi2015soliton (); joshi2016thermally (); wang2016intracavity (). Soliton microcombs provide a pathway towards miniaturization of OFC systems for application to time-standards newman2018photonic (), optical frequency synthesis spencer2018integrated (), precision spectroscopy suh2016microresonator (); dutt2018chip (), telecommunications marin2017microresonator (); mazur2018enabling (), LIDAR suh2018soliton (); trocha2018ultrafast (), imaging bao2018microresonator (), and astronomy suh2018searching (); obrzud2017astrocomb (). Pumping power of microcombs is an important design consideration and severely impacts generation of low repetition rate solitons. Such devices are required for microcomb interface to detectors and electronics, but are particularly challenging to operate at low pumping power. This can be understood by considering the Kerr parametric oscillation threshold power which is given by, kippenberg2004kerr (); yi2015soliton ()

where is refractive index, is the optical frequency, is effective mode area, is the Kerr coefficient, is the waveguide-to-resonator loading factor, () is the total (external) quality factor, and is the free spectral range (FSR) or the repetition rate. The operating power of all microcombs is a multiple of this threshold power, and the expression makes clear that decreased repetition rate (smaller FSR) increases threshold and in turn comb power. Physically, this happens because the pumping volume of the resonator is larger for smaller FSR devices.

Figure 1: Schematics of experimental setup and microcomb module. Single wavelength diode laser directly pumps a silica microresonator packaged into a fiber-connectorized module to generate a 10 GHz soliton microcomb. Pump laser is polarization controlled before optical coupling via fiber taper. Output soliton power is tapped and used as an error signal for servo control of laser yi2016active (). Device temperature is controlled using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC). Upper left inset: photograph of 10 GHz soliton module with fiber pigtails. Lower right inset: schematic cross-sectional view of silica wedge disk resonator. Optical modes are guided at the perimeter of the wedged silica disk.

The impact of lower FSRs on microcomb power can be offset by leveraging the favorable inverse quadratic dependence of power on optical Q factor in the threshold equation as has been demonstrated using crystalline and silica-based microcombs herr2014temporal (); yi2015soliton (); suh2018gigahertz (); yang2018bridging (). Recently, such designs have been applied to realize directly-pumped microcombs with low-repetition-rate (silica: 22 GHz, 40 mW volet2018micro (), and crystalline: 12.5 GHz, 100 mW pump pavlov2018narrow ()), wherein a resonator is directly connected to a pump laser without the need for intermediate amplification or soliton triggering hardware. It is also worth noting that improving optical Q factors in silicon nitride resonators have enabled recent demonstrations of 100 GHz soliton rates with 10 mW optical pumping liu2018ultralow () as well as 1 W electrical pumping raja2018electrically (); and 200 GHz soliton rates with 100 mW electrical pumping from a battery stern2018battery ().

Figure 2: Soliton spectrum. (a) Optical spectrum of 10 GHz soliton microcomb at 19 mW pump power. The squared hyperbolic secant envelope (dashed green curve) gives a soliton pulse width of 370 fs. Pump laser line at 1556 nm is filtered out by a fiber bragg grating. Inset: Electrical spectrum showing the soliton repetition rate of 10.02 GHz. Signal-to-noise (SNR) is greater than 70 dB for a resolution bandwidth (RBW) of 1 kHz. (b) Zoom-in of the optical spectrum over a 1 nm span.

In this letter, direct pumping of 10 GHz repetition rate soliton microcombs from low-power ( 20 mW) diode lasers is reported. In the experiment, the high-Q whispering-gallery-mode silica resonators lee2012chemically () featured an 6.5 mm diameter corresponding to a 10.02 GHz soliton comb line spacing. Single soliton generation was possible at 15 mW pump power using the devices. Typical unloaded quality factors and parametric oscillation threshold for this design are reported elsewhere suh2018gigahertz (). The resonators are specifically designed for operation in the final frequency division stage of an optical atomic clock newman2018photonic () and a robust fiber-taper coupling inside a compact module (30 mm x 94 mm x 15 mm) was implemented (Fig.1) that included fiber pigtails and a thermoelectric cooling (TEC) element. Two modules were fabricated at the California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, CA, USA) and shipped to the Draper Laboratories (Cambridge, MA, USA) for testing relating to the clock experiment.

Figure 3: Temperature feedback control of soliton offset frequency. (a) Relative frequency drift of a comb line relative to an HCN reference laser without (left) and with (right) temperature feedback control. The data is acquired with 1 second gate time over 1000 seconds using a frequency counter. (b) Allan deviation plot of the data in panel (a) showing 300 kHz deviation at 100 seconds averaging.

In the experimental setup at Draper Laboratories, the packaged devices are directly pumped by a diode laser (RIO PLANEX Series 1556 nm laser). The diode laser has a short-term linewidth of 1 kHz and a maximum output power of approximately 23 mW at 150 mA bias current. Laser frequency can be swept at a speed of 100 GHz/s by tuning the bias current. This enables rapid tuning of the pump into the soliton existence detuning range for soliton triggering volet2018micro (). After the transmitted pump power is filtered using a fiber bragg grating (FBG) the soliton power is tapped via a 90/10 fiber splitter. The 10 percent port of soliton power is photodetected and used as an error signal for servo control to maintain the soliton state yi2016active (). Generation of single soliton states using under 20 mW pump power was possible in both devices. Fig. 2a shows the optical spectrum of the generated soliton from one device at 19 mW pump power. The squared hyperbolic secant envelope (dashed green curve) indicates the soliton pulse width is 370 fs. The electrical spectrum (Fig. 2a inset) shows the soliton repetition rate of 10.02 GHz with 70dB signal-to-noise. The zoomed-in optical spectrum in Fig. 2b shows the equidistantly-spaced comb lines.

To improve the long term stability of the system, the device temperature is controlled via a TEC element installed inside the module. In an independent measurement (performed at Caltech) to test the performance of the temperature feedback loop, one of the comb lines was heterodyned with an HCN reference laser (1559 nm Clarity laser manufactured by Wavelength References, Inc.) and the beat frequency was measured using a frequency counter. Figure 3a shows that the temperature feedback can suppress the beat frequency drift due to the environmental temperature changes. With the temperature feedback, an absolute frequency instability of 300 kHz at 100 second averaging time (Fig. 3b) was measured. Considering that the HCN reference laser shows an absolute frequency instability of 200 kHz at 100 seconds averaging, we can conclude that an absolute stability of the comb offset frequency better than 200 kHz is achieved at 100 seconds averaging with the temperature feedback.

In summary, 10 GHz soliton microcomb devices were fabricated, packaged into fiber connectorized modules, transported across the North American continent and then successfully operated by direct pumping from low-power ( 20 mW) diode lasers. This low direct pumping power represents a record for this low comb repetition rate, and its X-band rate also enables use of low-bandwidth detectors and simplifies the electronic interface with the microcomb system (here a clock). These devices can be potentially integrated with SiN waveguides yang2018bridging () for more compact systems. The modules also feature a built-in TEC control that was able to stabilize the comb offset frequency in an open lab environment better than 200 kHz at 100 s averaging time.

Funding Information

The authors acknowledge research funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Atomic Clocks with Enhanced Stability (ACES) program (HR0011-16-C-0118). The views, opinions and/or findings expressed are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. This work is also supported by the Kavli Nanoscience Institute


  • (1) Diddams, S. A. The evolving optical frequency comb. JOSA B 27, B51–B62 (2010).
  • (2) Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Science 361, eaan8083 (2018).
  • (3) Herr, T. et al. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nature Photonics 8, 145–152 (2014).
  • (4) Brasch, V. et al. Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton cherenkov radiation. Science 351, 357–360 (2016).
  • (5) Yi, X., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-q silica microresonator. Optica 2, 1078–1085 (2015).
  • (6) Joshi, C. et al. Thermally controlled comb generation and soliton modelocking in microresonators. Optics Letters 41, 2565–2568 (2016).
  • (7) Wang, P.-H. et al. Intracavity characterization of micro-comb generation in the single-soliton regime. Optics Express 24, 10890–10897 (2016).
  • (8) Newman, Z. et al. Photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00616 (2018).
  • (9) Spencer, D. T. et al. An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature 557, 81–85 (2018).
  • (10) Suh, M.-G., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science 354, 600–603 (2016).
  • (11) Dutt, A. et al. On-chip dual-comb source for spectroscopy. Science Advances 4, e1701858 (2018).
  • (12) Marin-Palomo, P. et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature 546, 274–279 (2017).
  • (13) Mazur, M. et al. Enabling high spectral efficiency coherent superchannel transmission with soliton microcombs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.11046 (2018).
  • (14) Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. J. Soliton microcomb range measurement. Science 359, 884–887 (2018).
  • (15) Trocha, P. et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science 359, 887–891 (2018).
  • (16) Bao, C., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Microresonator soliton dual-comb imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09766 (2018).
  • (17) Suh, M.-G. et al. Searching for exoplanets using a microresonator astrocomb. Nature Photonics 13, 25 (2019).
  • (18) Obrzud, E. et al. A microphotonic astrocomb. Nature Photonics 13, 31 (2019).
  • (19) Kippenberg, T., Spillane, S. & Vahala, K. Kerr-nonlinearity optical parametric oscillation in an ultrahigh-q toroid microcavity. Physical Review Letters 93, 083904 (2004).
  • (20) Yi, X., Yang, Q.-F., Youl, K. & Vahala, K. Active capture and stabilization of temporal solitons in microresonators. Optics Letters 41, 2037–2040 (2016).
  • (21) Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Gigahertz-repetition-rate soliton microcombs. Optica 5, 65–66 (2018).
  • (22) Yang, K. Y. et al. Bridging ultrahigh-q devices and photonic circuits. Nature Photonics 12, 297 (2018).
  • (23) Volet, N. et al. Micro-resonator soliton generated directly with a diode laser. Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700307 (2018).
  • (24) Pavlov, N. et al. Narrow-linewidth lasing and soliton kerr microcombs with ordinary laser diodes. Nature Photonics 12, 694 (2018).
  • (25) Liu, J. et al. Ultralow-power chip-based soliton microcombs for photonic integration. Optica 5, 1347–1353 (2018).
  • (26) Raja, A. S. et al. Electrically pumped photonic integrated soliton microcomb. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03909 (2018).
  • (27) Stern, B., Ji, X., Okawachi, Y., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator. Nature 562, 401 (2018).
  • (28) Lee, H. et al. Chemically etched ultrahigh-q wedge-resonator on a silicon chip. Nature Photonics 6, 369–373 (2012).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description