Direct laser cooling Al{}^{+} ions optical clocks

Direct laser cooling Al ions optical clocks

Abstract

Al ions optical clock is a very promising optical frequency standard candidate due to its extremely small blackbody radiation shift. It has been successfully demonstrated with indirect cooled, quantum-logic-based spectroscopy technique. Its accuracy is limited by second-order Doppler shift, and its stability is limited by the number of ions that can be probed in quantum logic processing. We propose a direct laser cooling scheme of Al ions optical clocks where both the stability and accuracy of the clocks are greatly improved. In the proposed scheme, two Al ions traps are utilized. The first trap is used to trap a large number of Al ions to improve the stability of the clock laser, while the second trap is used to trap a single Al ions to provide the ultimate accuracy. Both traps are cooled with a continuous wave 167 nm laser. The expected clock laser stability can reach . For the second trap, in addition to 167 nm laser Doppler cooling, a second stage pulsed 234 nm two-photon cooling laser is utilized to further improve the accuracy of the clock laser. The total systematic uncertainty can be reduced to about . The proposed Al ions optical clock has the potential to become the most accurate and stable optical clock.

pacs:
06.30.Ft, 37.10.Ty, 32.70.Jz

Atomic clocks have many applications in precision spectroscopy Hall (); Hansch (), test of relativity Schiller (); Wolf (); Chou (), and astronomy Steinmetz (); Li (). They also have significant impact on applications found in everyday life, such as global navigation systems, and high-speed data transmission and communication. Given the increasing demand on better frequency standards for diverse applications, for example in measuring the time variations of fundamental constants Rosenband (); Godun (); Huntemann2 (), more stable and accurate atomic clocks are needed. Optical clocks, or atomic clocks using optical transitions, have much higher value in comparison to that of microwave atomic clocks. As a consequence, optical clocks potentially can have better stability and accuracy than today’s best microwave atomic clocks. Currently the best cesium fountain clocks have fractional frequency uncertainties of Heavner (), while optical clocks have long been recognized to have the potential to reach a systematic fractional frequency uncertainty below .

Many groups are working on optical clocks with the goal of realizing improved frequency standards for a new definition of the SI second and testing fundamental physics. Currently there are two possible routes to develop an optical clock. One is based on trapped ions in a Paul trap, the other is based on neutral atoms trapped in an optical lattice. Potential choices of single ion species include Hg Oskay (), Sr Barwood (); Dube (), Yb King (); Huntemann (), Ca Hashimoto (); Huang (), In Wang (), and Ba Fortson (), while potential choices of optical lattice clocks include Sr Katori (); Paris (); Bloom (), Yb Ludlow (), and Hg Bize ().

The 3s S - 3s3p P transition in Al at 267.4 nm, which has a narrow natural line width of 8 mHz, is an excellent choice for optical clock transition. The value of this transition is . Its electric quadrupole shift is negligible since the transition is between J = 0 states, therefore the transition frequency is not influenced by the electric field gradient at the center of the ion trap. Furthermore, blackbody radiation contribution to the fractional frequency uncertainty of the Al ion clock is as low as at room temperature, which is the smallest among all atomic species currently under consideration for optical clocks Safronova (). As a consequence, Al ion clocks have very small systematic uncertainty.

The stability of an optical clock is limited by quantum project noise (QPN). QPN sets the quantum limit to a clock stability, and it can be expressed as Ye ()

(1)

Here is the quality factor, is the clock cycle time, is the number of atoms, is the averaging time, and is a numerical factor near unity. In the case of Al ion clock, . In a typical neutral atoms optical lattice clock, is on the order of . So it is generally accepted that optical lattice clocks have better stability, while single ion optical clocks have better accuracy, although this belief has been shaken recently with the latest neutral atoms optical lattice clock results Bloom (); Ludlow ().

In this Letter, we suggest an Al ion optical clock scheme that has the potential of surpassing both the stability and accuracy performance levels of current best optical clocks. In this scheme, two Al ion traps are utilized. One trap is used to trap large number of Al ions (at the order of ), the other trap is used to trap single Al ions. Figure 1(a) shows the working principle of the suggested scheme. The frequency of the 267.4 nm laser (the clock laser) is first locked to the atomic transition of Al ions in the first trap. Due to a large number of Al ions involved, the stability of the locked clock laser can be greatly improved to even less than that of an optical lattice clock. The clock laser is then further locked to the second ion trap that traps only one single Al ion. In this way, the accuracy of the clock laser is limited by the single ion trap accuracy. This optical clock approach might provide an ultimate optical clock with a stability surpassing that of an optical lattice clock and an accuracy of a single ion optical clock.

In order to explain the potential improvement of the new proposal, it is helpful to review the performance limitation of current Al ion optical clock. The idea of Al ion optical clock is first proposed by Yu, Dehmelt, and Nagourney Yu (). In order to construct an Al ion optical clock, at least a cooling laser is needed to cool the ion in the trap and detect its quantum state through the method of electron-shelving. The fluorescence rate of the cooling transition shall be large enough to facilitate efficient cooling and detection. In Al ion the transition which meets the requirement is from 3s S to 3s3p P. Its natural linewidth is 230 MHz and its wavelength is 167 nm. However, since there is no continuous wave (CW) laser which can reaches this wavelength at the time of the proposal, the Al clock cannot be experimentally realized after it was proposed. In order to overcome this difficulty, a method of quantum logic spectroscopy (QLS) was proposed to cool the ion and detect the clock transition Schmidt (). The QLS method can be implemented in a linear trap, where an auxiliary (for example, Be) logic ion together with an Al ion are trapped Wineland1 (). The logic ion provides sympathetic laser cooling, state initialization, and state detection for the simultaneously trapped Al ion. After sympathetic laser cooling, both the logic ion and the Al ion can be cooled to vibrational ground state. The Coulomb interaction of the ions couples their motions. Then the state detection is achieved through a coherent transfer of the Al ion’s internal quantum state onto the logic ion. Through the QLS method, the first Al optical clock was successfully demonstrated at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Wineland1 (). Its frequency was compared to a Hg ion optical clock, the comparison results yield a preliminary constraint on the temporal variation of the fine-structure constant of /year Rosenband (). In subsequent experiments, Mg ion was used as the logic ion to realize an Al ion clock with better systematic uncertainty Chou2 (). Using two Al ion clocks, NIST verified the relativistic time dilation effect and the gravitational time dilation effect Chou ().

The systematic uncertainty of the QLS-based Al ion clock () is dominated by the second order Doppler effects, which is mainly due to the fact that two ions have to be trapped simultaneously. If only a single aluminum ion is trapped in the trap, it can be expected that the systematic uncertainty can be greatly reduced. In order to trap a single Al ion, as mentioned above, a CW 167 nm laser has to be built for direct laser cooling. One of the possible schemes to build a 167 nm laser is to use two frequency doubling processes, starting from a 667 nm laser Chi (). Frequency doubling from 667 nm to 334 nm can be realized by a second harmonic generation (SHG) cavity with a BBO crystal. However, frequency doubling from 334 nm to 167 nm cannot be realized without a suitable nonlinear crystal. This problem can be solved after the invention of Potassium Fluoroboratoberyllate (KBBF) crystal KBBF1 (). With KBBF’s absorption edge at 153 nm, the lowest obtained wavelength is 156 nm under pulsed operation KBBF2 (). In principle, KBBF crystal can be used to generate a 167 nm CW laser through direct SHG as long as enough length of crystal can be grown. The growth technique of KBBF crystal has made significant progress, overcoming the early growth problems. As a consequence, KBBF crystal with length more than 6 mm can be grown KBBF1 (). Recently, a mW CW 191 nm laser using SHG of KBBF crystal has been demonstrated KBBF3 (), thus laying a solid foundation for a CW 167 nm laser with tens of microwatts power output. Since the saturation power of Al ion S to P transition is only 5 W assuming a focused spot radius of 5 m, this power level shall be enough to fulfill the cooling laser requirements.

In this proposal, we will evaluate the systematic uncertainty of an Al ion optical clock assuming a 167 nm laser is available. In this case, we only need to trap one single Al ion, and we first Doppler cool the ion with the 167 nm laser. Figure 1(b) shows the relevant energy levels of Al ions. Two types of residual motions cause time-dilation shifts: excess micromotion and secular motion. In both cases the relative clock frequency shifts by

(2)

where is the mean-squared velocity of Al ions. Here we have neglected the frequency-dependent term that corresponds to the Stark shift from the motion-inducing electric fields. Stark shift correction is less than 2% for a motional frequency of tens of MHz Berkeland ().

After the 167 nm laser Doppler cooling is finished, the second order secular motion Doppler shift can be calculated as

(3)

Here is the mass of Al ions, is the natural line width of the transition from S to P. The calculated fractional frequency shift is . The second order micromotion Doppler shift is given by Berkeland ()

(4)

is a parameter characterizing the magnitude of excess micromotion. For a conservative trap parameter of Keller (), and an ion trap RF driving frequency of 20 MHz, the fractional frequency shift is .

From the above calculation we can see that just using 167 nm direct laser cooling, the second-order Doppler shift due to secular motion is higher than that of QLS-based method () Chou2 (). A straightforward way to solve this problem is to introduce a second stage cooling based on the spin-forbidden intercombination transition from S to P through a 267 nm laser Katori2 (); Ertmer (). Unfortunately, the S to P transition natural line width is only 500 Hz, and there is no suitable quenching transition for Al ion Ertmer2 (); Garreau (); Curtis (); Sterr (). As a consequence, the 267 nm laser cooling rate is too small to be effective.

To solve this problem, we propose a second stage laser cooling based on two-photon transition. Two-photon cooling with CW lasers has been proposed and demonstrated in neutral atomic systems before Cruz (); Thomsen (). In our case, the relevant two-photon transition is from D (state ) to S (state ) with a transition rate of s. The corresponding two-photon transition laser wavelength is 234 nm. This value does not seem to be too large either, but there are another two-step transition process from decays to through P (state ). The relevant transition rates are s and s, respectively. The combined transition rate from to is , where can be expressed as Thomsen ()

(5)

Here and are Rabi frequency and detuning to state , respectively. The transition rate from to is dominated by so that s.

It can be calculated that the required saturation power for a CW 234 nm laser is over 200 mW, assuming a focused spot radius of 5 m. Such power level is difficult to reach at the moment. Unless an enhancement cavity is used inside the ion trap vacuum chamber with associated other experimental issues. A simpler method is to use an ultrafast pulsed laser with center wavelength at 234 nm Kielpinski (). It can be calculated that the two-photon cooling saturation power for a 250 MHz repetition rate ultrafast laser is less than 100 mW, which is well within reach of current technological level.

With two-photon pulsed laser cooling as the second stage cooling, we can cool Al ions to vibrational ground state in the strong confinement regime. In this condition, the second order Doppler shift is recoil limited. Second-order secular motion Doppler shift due to 234 nm pulsed laser is given by

(6)

The result is . Second-order excess micromotion Doppler shift due to 234 nm pulsed laser is according to Eq. (4).

In addition, motional heating of trapped ions can increase the second-order Doppler shift when ions are not cooled. The rate of increasing can be written as

(7)

where is the heating rate, and is the secular motion frequency. Taking s, MHz, and probe time of 1 s, the second-order Doppler shift due to this motional heating is .

The systematic shifts and uncertainties of the direct cooled Al ion optical clocks are listed in table 1. We use similar experimental conditions as those used in the QLS-based Al ion optical clocks, with potentials for further improvements. It can be seen that the systematic uncertainties are reduced by a factor of eight in comparison to that of the QLS-based Al ion optical clocks, and has the potential to become one of the most accurate optical clocks.

The stability of QLS-based Al ion optical clocks is reported to be assuming equal contributions of two comparison clocks Wineland1 (). To increase the stability of the Al ion optical clocks, two Al ion traps are utilized. The first trap is used to trap a large number of Al ions, and the second trap is the one that we just discussed to trap single Al ions. The frequency of the 267.4 nm clock laser is first locked to the atomic transition of Al ions in the first trap for faster reduction of the phase noise of the clock laser. Since we are not concerning about the accuracy for the first trap, a first stage direct 167 nm laser cooling is enough.

Similar ideas have been proposed before, where the frequency of the clock laser is locked to the atomic transition using several ensembles of atoms Sorensen (); Rosenband2 (). The stability of the clock laser scales as . Here is the number of ensembles, and each ensemble has equal number of atoms . is a parameter characterizing the frequency fluctuations of the free running clock laser, and is the probing time of the first trap.

In our scheme, we use two traps with unequal number of ions. Following the discussion of Ref.Sorensen (), the first ion trap is operated with a cycle time of , and the second trap is operated with a cycle time of , where is an integer multiples of . The stability of the clock laser at time after locking to the first trap is

(8)

where is the angular frequency of the clock laser. This stability is further improved after locking to the second trap,

(9)

where .

The longest we can allow is determined by how well the clock laser is stabilized by the first trap as . Similarly, the longest is limited by the free running clock laser stability as . and are in the order of 0.1 Sorensen (). Then the clock laser stability can be expressed as

(10)

This result shall be compared with the clock laser stability when it is locked to a single ion trap,

(11)

As an example, suppose we can trap ions in the first trap, and we take , then our scheme can reach a stability level of , a factor of more than 20 times improvement in comparison with that of single ions trap. The expected stability improvement is shown in Fig. 2. This stability level will even surpass the stability level of optical lattice clocks. At this stability level, the free running clock laser Dick effect has to be taken into account. In Fig. 2, the Dick effect contribution of a currently best 40 mHz line width laser is also shown Kessler ().

There are questions that with an increased excess micromotion associated with ions in the first trap, whether a stability of is achievable. For a linear quadrupole trap, the line broadening effect due to the excess micromotion can be calculated as Prestage1 ()

(12)

where we have taken the trap length to be 1 cm. According to Eq. (1), the expected stability limit is , which is smaller than . Even better stability limit can be expected if we choose to use a multi-pole linear ion trap, for instance, at least a factor of ten improvement has been achieved with a 12-pole linear ion trap Prestage2 ().

In conclusion, we propose an Al ion optical clock scheme where two ion traps are utilized. The first trap is used to trap a large number of Al ions to improve the stability of the clock laser, while the second trap is used to trap a single Al ion to provide the ultimate accuracy. Both traps are cooled with a CW 167 nm laser. With the first trap trapping over ions, the expected clock laser stability can reach . Since trapping of ions is not a difficult task, with potential of trapping ions Drewsen (), the calculated stability can be treated as a conservative estimation. For the second trap, in addition to CW 167 nm laser Doppler cooling, a second stage pulsed 234 nm laser two-photon cooling is utilized to further improve the accuracy of the clock laser. The second order Doppler frequency shift can be reduced to a level of , and the total systematic uncertainty can be reduced to about , which is greatly improved over the current QLS-based Al ion optical clocks. We shall further emphasize that the proposal principle is not restricted to Al ions clocks, but is applicable to other ions clocks.

Acknowledgements.
We wish to thank H. Che for preliminary calculation of the two-photon transition rate. The project is partially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB821300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91336213, 11174095, 11304109, and 91536116), and Program for New Century Excellent Talents by the Ministry of Education (NCET-11-0176).

Fractional shift () Uncertainty ()
Excess micromotion -0.15 0.05
Secular motion -0.07 0.02
Motional heating -0.16 0.05
Blackbody radiation shift 1.2 0.4
Quadratic Zeeman shift -1079.9 0.7
Linear Doppler shift 0 0.3
Clock laser Stark shift 0 0.2
Background-gas collisions 0 0.5
AOM frequency error 0 0.2
Total -1079.3 1.03

Table 1: Clock uncertainty budget.

Figure 1: (Color online) (a) Proposed Al ions optical clocks scheme. (b) Energy levels and relevant transitions of Al ions.

Figure 2: (Color online) Comparison of clock laser stability. The black line is the current Al ion optical clock performance level of , and the red line is the expected clock laser stability improvement level of . For comparison, the Dick effect contribution from a 40 mHz line width laser (probe time 0.8 s, dead time 0.2 s) is shown as the blue line.

References

  1. J. L. Hall, “Nobel Lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1279 (2006).
  2. T. W. Hänsch, “Nobel Lecture: Passion for precision,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297 (2006).
  3. S. Schiller, et al. “Einstein Gravity Explorer-a medium-class fundamental physics mission,” Exp. Astron. 23, 573 (2009).
  4. P. Wolf, et al. “Quantum physics exploring gravity in the outer solar system: the SAGAS project,” Exp. Astron. 23, 651 (2009).
  5. C. W. Chou, D. B. Hume, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, “Optical Clocks and Relativity,” Science 329, 1630 (2010).
  6. T. Steinmetz, et al. “Laser Frequency Combs for Astronomical Observations,” Science 321, 1335 (2008).
  7. C. H. Li, et al. “A laser frequency comb that enables radial velocity measurements with a precision of 1 cm s,” Nature 452, 610 (2008).
  8. T. Rosenband, et al. “Frequency Ratio of Al and Hg Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place,” Science 319, 1808 (2008).
  9. R. M. Godun, et al. “Frequency Ratio of Two Optical Clock Transitions in Yb and Constraints on the Time Variation of Fundamental Constants,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210801 (2014).
  10. N. Huntemann, B. Lipphardt, Chr. Tamm, V. Gerginov, S. Weyers, and E. Peik, “Improved Limit on a Temporal Variation of m/m from Comparisons of Yb and Cs Atomic Clocks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210802 (2014).
  11. T. P. Heavner, E. A. Donley, F. Levi, G. Costanzo, T. E. Parker, J. H. Shirley, N. Ashby, S. Barlow, and S. R. Jefferts, “First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2,” Metrologia 51, 174 (2014).
  12. W. H. Oskay, et al. “Single-Atom Optical Clock with High Accuracy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 020801 (2006).
  13. G. P. Barwood, G. Huang, H. A. Klein, L. A. M. Johnson, S. A. King, H. S. Margolis, K. Szymaniec, and P. Gill, “Agreement between two Sr optical clocks to 4 parts in 10,” Phys. Rev. A 89, 050501(R) (2014).
  14. P. Dubé, A. A. Madej, M. Tibbo, and J. E. Bernard, “High-Accuracy Measurement of the Differential Scalar Polarizability of a Sr Clock Using the Time-Dilation Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 173002 (2014).
  15. S. A. King, R. M. Godun, S. A. Webster, H. S. Margolis, L. A. M. Johnson, K. Szymaniec, P. E. G. Baird, and P. Gill, “Absolute frequency measurement of the S-F electric octupole transition in a single ion of Yb with 10 fractional uncertainty,” New J. Phys. 14, 013045 (2012).
  16. N. Huntemann, M. Okhapkin, B. Lipphardt, S. Weyers, C. Tamm, and E. Peik, “High-Accuracy Optical Clock Based on the Octupole Transition in Yb,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 090801 (2012).
  17. Y. Hashimoto, M. Kitaoka, T. Yoshida, and S. Hasegawa, “Observation of sympathetically cooled Ca ions in a linear ion trap,” Appl. Phys. B 103, 339 (2011).
  18. Y. Huang, Q. Liu, J. Cao, B. Ou, P. Liu, H. Guan, X. Huang, and K. Gao, “Evaluation of the systematic shifts of a single-Ca-ion frequency standard,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 053841 (2011).
  19. Y. H. Wang, R. Dumke, T. Liu, A. Stejskal, Y. N. Zhao, J. Zhang, Z. H. Lu, L. J. Wang, T. Becker, and H. Walther, “Absolute frequency measurement and high resolution spectroscopy of In 5s S-5s5p P narrowline transition,” Opt. Commun. 273, 526 (2007).
  20. T. W. Koerber, M. H. Schacht, K. R. G. Hendrickson, W. Nagourney, and E. N. Fortson, “rf Spectroscopy with a Single Ba Ion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 143002 (2002).
  21. M. Takamoto, T. Takano, and H. Katori, “Frequency comparison of optical lattice clocks beyond the Dick limit,” Nature Photon. 5, 288 (2011).
  22. R. Le Targat, et al. “Experimenting an optical second with strontium lattice clocks,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2109 (2013).
  23. B. J. Bloom, T. L. Nicholson, J. R. Williams, S. L. Campbell, M. Bishof, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, S. L. Bromley, and J. Ye, “An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10 level,” Nature 506, 71 (2014).
  24. N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Pizzocaro, C. W. Oates, A. D. Ludlow, “An Atomic Clock with 10 Instability,” Science 341, 1215 (2013).
  25. J. J. McFerran, L. Yi, S. Mejri, S. Di Manno, W. Zhang, J. Guéna, Y. Le Coq, and S. Bize,“Neutral Atom Frequency Reference in the Deep Ultraviolet with Fractional Uncertainty ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 183004 (2012).
  26. M. S. Safronova, M. G. Kozlov, and C. W. Clark, “Precision Calculation of Blackbody Radiation Shifts for Optical Frequency Metrology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 143006 (2011).
  27. T. L. Nicholson, M. J. Martin, J. R. Williams, B. J. Bloom, M. Bishof, M. D. Swallows, S. L. Campbell, and J. Ye, “Comparison of Two Independent Sr Optical Clocks with Stability at 10 s,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230801 (2012).
  28. N. Yu, H. Dehmelt, and W. Nagourney, “The 3S-3P transition in the aluminum isotope ion Al: A potentially superior passive laser frequency standard and spectrum analyzer,” Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7289 (1992).
  29. P. O. Schmidt, T. Rosenband, C. Langer, W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland, “Spectroscopy Using Quantum Logic,” Science 309, 749 (2005).
  30. T. Rosenband, P. O. Schmidt, D. B. Hume, W. M. Itano, T. M. Fortier, J. E. Stalnaker, K. Kim, S. A. Diddams, J. C. J. Koelemeij, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland, “Observation of the S P Clock Transition in Al,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220801 (2007).
  31. H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, “Magneto-Optical Trapping and Cooling of Strontium Atoms down to the Photon Recoil Temperature,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1116 (1999).
  32. T. Binnewies, G. Wilpers, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, J. Helmcke, T. E. Mehlstäubler, E. M. Rasel, and W. Ertmer, “Doppler Cooling and Trapping on Forbidden Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123002 (2001).
  33. T. E. Mehlstäubler, J. Keupp, A. Douillet, N. Rehbein, E. M. Rasel, and W. Ertmer, “Modelling three-dimensional-quench cooling for alkaline-earth atoms,” J. Opt. B 5, S183 (2003).
  34. V. Zehnlé and J. C. Garreau, “Doppler cooling to the recoil limit by means of sharp atomic transitions with controlled quenching,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 931 (2003).
  35. E. A. Curtis, C. W. Oates, and Leo Hollberg, “Quenched narrow-line second- and third-stage laser cooling of Ca,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 977 (2003).
  36. U. Sterr, T. Binnewies, C. Degenhardt, G. Wilpers, J. Helmcke, and F. Riehle, “Prospects of Doppler cooling on forbidden lines,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 985 (2003).
  37. W. C. Magno, R. L. Cavasso Filho, and F. C. Cruz, “Two-photon Doppler cooling of alkaline-earth-metal and ytterbium atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 043407 (2003).
  38. N. Malossi, et al. “Two-photon cooling of magnesium atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 051403(R) (2005).
  39. D. Kielpinski, “Laser cooling of atoms and molecules with ultrafast pulses,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 063407 (2006).
  40. C. W. Chou, D. B. Hume, J. C. J. Koelemeij, D. J. Wineland, and T. Rosenband, “Frequency Comparison of Two High-Accuracy Al Optical Clocks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070802 (2010).
  41. M. Chi, G. Erbert, B. Sumpf, and P. M. Petersen, “Tunable high-power narrow-spectrum external-cavity diode laser based on tapered amplifier at 668 nm,” Opt. Lett. 35, 1545 (2010).
  42. C. Chen, G. Wang, X. Wang, and Z. Xu, “Deep-UV nonlinear optical crystal KBeBOF - discovery, growth, optical properties and applications,” Appl. Phys. B 97, 9 (2009).
  43. T. Kanai, T. Kanda, T. Sekikawa, S. Watanabe, T. Togashi, C. Chen, C. Zhang, Z. Xu, and J. Wang, “Generation of vacuum-ultraviolet light below 160 nm in a KBBF crystal by the fifth harmonic of a single-mode Ti:sapphire laser,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 370 (2004).
  44. M. Scholz, D. Opalevs, P. Leisching, W. Kaenders, G. Wang, X. Wang, R. Li, and C. Chen, “1.3-mW tunable and narrow-band continuous-wave light source at 191 nm,” Opt. Express 20, 18659 (2012).
  45. D. J. Berkeland, J. D. Miller, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Minimization of ion micromotion in a Paul trap,” J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5025 (1998).
  46. J. Keller, H. L. Partner, T. Burgermeister, and T. E. Mehlstäubler, “Precise determination of micromotion for trapped-ion optical clocks,” J. Appl. Phys. 118, 104501 (2015).
  47. J. Borregaard and A. S. Sørensen, “Efficient Atomic Clocks Operated with Several Atomic Ensembles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090802 (2013).
  48. T. Rosenband and D. R. Leibrandt, “Exponential scaling of clock stability with atom number,” arXiv:1303.6357v2.
  49. T. Kessler, C. Hagemann, C. Grebing, T. Legero, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, M. J. Martin, L. Chen, and J. Ye, “A sub-40-mHz-linewidth laser based on a silicon single-crystal optical cavity,” Nature Photon. 6, 687 (2012).
  50. M. Drewsen, C. Brodersen, L. Hornekær, J. S. Hangst, and J. P. Schiffer, “Large Ion Crystals in a Linear Paul Trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2878 (1998).
  51. J. D. Prestage, R. L. Tjoelker, G. J. Dick, and L. Maleki, “Doppler sideband spectra for ions in a linear trap,” pp. 148-154, 1993 IEEE Internation Frequency Control Symposium, Salt Lake City, USA.
  52. J. D. Prestage, R. L. Tjoelker, and L. Maleki, “Higher Pole Linear Traps For Atomic Clock Applications,” pp. 121-124, 13th European Frequency and Time Forum and the 1999 IEEE Internation Frequency Control Symposium, Besancon, France.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
165002
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description