Diffractive production of isolated photons with the ZEUS detector at HERA

Diffractive production of isolated photons with the ZEUS detector at HERA

Aharon Levy 
On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration
Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
levyaron@post.tau.ac.il
Speaker.
Abstract

The photoproduction of isolated photons has been measured in diffractive events recorded by the ZEUS detector at HERA. Cross sections are evaluated in the photon transverse-energy and pseudorapidity ranges 5 15 GeV and inclusively and also with a jet with transverse energy and pseudorapidity in the ranges 4 35 GeV and -1.5 1.8, using a total integrated electron–proton luminosity of 374 . A number of kinematic variables were studied and compared to predictions from the Rapgap Monte Carlo model. An excess of data is observed above the Rapgap predictions for , where is the fraction of the longitudinal momentum of the colourless “Pomeron” exchange that is transferred to the photon–jet final state, giving evidence for direct Pomeron interactions.

Diffractive production of isolated photons with the ZEUS detector at HERA

 

Aharon Levythanks: Speaker.

On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration

Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

levyaron@post.tau.ac.il

\abstract@cs

EPS-HEP 2017, European Physical Society conference on High Energy Physics 5-12 July 2017 Venice, Italy

1 Introduction

The HERA collider took data during the period 1992 - 2007. Its rich physics output covered hard processes in the deep inelastic scattering (DIS) regime down to soft interactions in the photoproduction region [1]. Hard processes were studied also in the photoproduction regime when a high scale was present. In the present talk, results are presented of hard scattered isolated photons associated with jets in the photoproduction region. The photoptroduction regime is usually defined as a region where the four-momentum squared between the scatted and the incoming electron, , is less than 1 GeV. In this region no scattered electron is observed.

HERA also showed that diffraction, usually thought to be a soft process, is present also in hard processes [2] resulting in events with a large rapidity gap. The results presented in this talk are of isolated photons (called hereafter prompt photons) which are diffractively produced. Analyses of prompt photons in the DIS [3] and the non-diffractive photoproduction [4] regions have already been presented by the two HERA collaborations.

The reaction studied here can be written as

(1.0)

where LRG is a large rapidity gap and pdis stands for proton dissociation. The LRG is also expressed by a the variable , which is the maximum pseudorapidity for energy-flow objects with energy of 0.4 GeV. Typially for diffraction events 2.5. The brackets on the right-hand side of the reaction describe states that are not observed in the detector. The prompt photon has a high transverse energy, 5 GeV, and represents hadrons or jets. The reaction (1) can be described as a reaction between the virtual photon, at thte electron vertex and the Pomeron, IP, at the proton vertex. The fraction of thte proton energy carried by the Pomeron is given to a good approximation by

(1.0)

where is the energy of the proton beam.

Having a hard scale, the partonic structure of their interaction can be studied. Both the exchanged photon and the Pomeron can act either as a whole (direct) or as a source of partons (resolved). These two classes of process, which are unambiguously defined only at the leading order (LO) of QCD, may be partially distinguished in events containing a high- photon and a jet by means of the quantity

(1.0)

which measures the fraction of the incoming photon energy that is given to the outgoing photon and jet. The quantities and denote the energies of the outgoing photon and the jet, respectively, and denotes the corresponding longitudinal momenta. The suffix “all” refers to all objects that are measured in the detector or, in the case of simulations at the hadron level, all final-state particles except for the scattered beam electron and the outgoing proton. Events with a detected final-state electron are excluded from this analysis.

The Pomeron may be described analogously to the photon [5, 6]. The fraction of the Pomeron energy that takes part in the hard interaction that generates the outgoing photon and jet is given by [7]:

(1.0)

where the quantities are as before, and corresponds to direct Pomeron events, which are equivalent to the presence of a delta-function in the parton distribution functions at  [5, 6]. An event whose observed final state consists only of a prompt photon and a jet has

Examples of diagrams describing the above processes are shown in Fig. 1. A reaction which proceeds through the interaction of a direct photon with a quark from a resolved Pomeron is shown in Fig. 1(a). In (b) a gluon from a resolved photon interacts with a quark from a resolved Pomeron. The interaction of a direct photon with a direct Pomeron is shown in Fig. 1(c).

Figure 1: Examples of diagrams for the diffractive production of a prompt photon and a jet in scattering from (a) direct (b) resolved photons, interacting with a resolved Pomeron. (c) Example of an interaction between a direct photon and a direct Pomeron.

The data used in this analysis is based on a data samples corresponding to an integrated luminosity of , taken during the years 2004–2007 with the ZEUS detector at HERA. During this period, HERA ran with electron and positron beams111Hereafter, “electron” refers to both electrons and positrons. of energy GeV and a proton beam of energy GeV.

2 The data

The following selections were made:

  • the forward scattered proton was not measured;

  • non-diffractive events were removed by the cuts 2.5 and 0.03;

  • remaining DIS events were removed by excluding events with identified electrons;

  • Bethe-Heitler () and deeply virtual Compton events were removed;

  • requirement was made for hard isolated photon candidates (5 GeV) in the barrel calorimeter ();

  • high-p jets, using a algorithm, were required to be in the region .

3 The outgoing prompt photon

The hard scattered photons can be extracted in a region of the detector which is finely segmented in the direction, namely the electromagnetic section of the ZEUS barrel calorimeter (BEMC), limiting the pseudorapidity of the photon to the region . This fine granularity allows the use of shower-shape distributions to distinguish isolated photons from the product of neutral meson decays such as . To this end, a method was developed [3] to make use of the energy-weighted width, measured in the direction, of the BEMC energy cluster comprising the photon candidate,

(3.0)

where is the position of the centre of the -th cell, is the energy-weighted centroid of the energy-flow-object cluster, is the width of the cell in the direction, and is the energy recorded in the cell. The sum runs over all BEMC cells in the cluster.

As this analysis studies diffractive prompt photon events having a large rapidity gap, the Rapgap Monte Carlo generator has been use to simulate the expectted distribution of prompt photons coming from a signal event and the distribution of photons coming from the background. In each bin of each physical quantity, the data were fitted to a combination of photon signal and hadronic background. The data together with the fitted results, for events with photon candidastes and at least one jet, are shown in Fig. 2. A good fit to thte data is obtained allowing to extract statistically the photon signal.

Figure 2: Distribution of for selected diffractive events with a photon candidate and at least one jet. The error bars denote the statistical uncertainties on the data, which are compared to the fitted signal and background components from the MC. The unit of measurement of is the width of one BEMC cell.

4 Results

After selecting the photon candidate events as described above, the distribution of the is shown in Fig. 3. It peaks toward high and a mixture of 70:30 of direct and resolved photon component events, as obtained from Rapgap gives a reasonable description of the data.

Figure 3: Events with a photon and at least one jet as a function of , per unit interval in , compared to a normalised 70:30 mixture of direct:resolved photon Rapgap events without reweighting.

The distribution of is shown in Fig. 4. A sharp peak is observed for 0.9 in contrast to the prediction of the MC generator that described well the . The Rapgap generator does not include the process of a direct Pomeron, as presented in Fig. 1(c). Agreement with the data is obtained by reweighting rapgap (a weight of 7 is applied to the direct photon component). The reweighted Rapgap changes very little in the description of Fig. 3 and still provides an adequate description of the data.

Figure 4: Differential cross section for isolated photon production accompanied by at least one jet, as a function of . The unreweighted Rapgap prediction is normalised to the data integrated over the region ; the reweighted prediction is normalised to the full integrated data.

The excess observed for 0.9 is evidence for the presence of a direct Pomeron interaction, predominantly in e direct photon channel.

References

  • [1] See eg H. Abramowicz and A. Caldwell, HERA Physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 1275.
  • [2] ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al., Phys. Lett. B 315 (1993) 481;   ZEUS Collaboration, M. Derrick et al., Phys. Lett. B 346 (1995) 399.
  • [3] H1 Collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 54 (2008) 371;   ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Lett. B 595 (2004) 86;   ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 16;   ZEUS Collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Phys. Lett. B 715 (2012) 88.
  • [4] ZEUS Collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 293;   ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 413 (1997) 201;   J. Breitweg et al., Phys. Lett. B 472 (2000) 175;   ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Phys. Lett. B 511 (2001) 19;   ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 49 (2007) 511;   H1 Collaboration, A Aktas et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 38 (2004) 437;   H1 Collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 17.
  • [5] B. Kniehl, H.-G. Kohrs and G. Kramer, Z. Phys. C 65 (1995) 657;  H.-G. Kohrs, hep-ph/9507208;  A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B 285 (1992) 172.
  • [6] G. Watt, A.D. Martin and M.G. Ryskin, arXiv:0708.4126;   A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin and G. Watt, Phys. Lett. B 644 (2007) 131.
  • [7] H1 Collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 15.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
174737
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description