Deterministic and stochastic aspects of the transition to turbulence

Baofang Song and Björn Hof

IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria

Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Bunsenstrasse 10, Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

The purpose of this contribution is to summarize and discuss
recent advances regarding the onset of turbulence in shear flows.
The absence of a clear cut instability mechanism, the spatio-temporal
intermittent character and extremely long lived transients
are some of the major difficulties encountered in these flows and
have hindered progress towards understanding the transition process.
We will show for the case of pipe flow that concepts from nonlinear dynamics and statistical
physics can help to explain the onset of turbulence. In particular
the turbulent structures (’puffs’) observed close to onset are
spatially localized chaotic transients and their lifetimes increase
super exponentially with Reynolds number. At the same time
fluctuations of individual turbulent puffs can (although very rarely)
lead to the nucleation of new puffs. The competition between these
two stochastic processes gives rise to a non-equilibrium phase
transition where turbulence changes from a super-transient to a
sustained state.

## 1 Introduction

How turbulence first arises in simple shear flows has remained
an open question for well over a century. Osborne Reynolds [1] was
the first to observe that this transition depends on a dimensionless
group, i.e. the Reynolds number, as well as on the amplitude of
disturbances present in the system. Some of the leading theorists
at the time (e.g. Lord Kelvin, Lord Rayleigh, Arnold Sommerfeld,
Werner Heisenberg, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz [44]) attempted to probe the stability of pipe and
related shear flows (i.e. channel and Couette flow) with essentially
linear methods. After many unsuccessful attempts it has
become clear (e.g. see [2]) that the occurrence of
turbulence is unrelated to the stability of the laminar state, as
Reynolds had already concluded from his experimental observations
many years earlier. While pipe and Couette flow are believed to
be stable for all Reynolds numbers, plane Poiseuille (i.e. channel)
flow becomes unstable at Re of about 5800. However in the latter
case turbulence is typically already observed at Reynolds numbers
a little above 1000 and to hold the flow laminar up to the linear
stability threshold actually requires considerable effort in experiments.

Transition in the type of flows discussed above is
qualitatively different from the classical pictures for the transition
to turbulence which goes back to Landau and to Ruelle and Takens [3].
In both scenarios turbulence arises following a sequence of
instabilities of the base flow (which hence becomes linearly unstable).
While the Ruelle Takens type transition
has been observed in several closed flows (e.g. [4])
it is noteworthy that even in this case the transition sequence only
explains the onset of comparably low dimensional chaotic motion
which dynamically is still far from the full spatio-temporal complexity encountered
in turbulent flows. In open shear flows such as pipes all experimental
observations show that the transition in contrast is rather abrupt
directly from laminar to turbulent. The
latter type of transition has turned out to be far more difficult to understand.

In more recent years a new transition mechanism has been proposed
based on dynamical systems concepts. Invariant solutions of the
Navier Stokes equations such as periodic orbits or traveling waves
are deemed to be ultimately responsible for the existence of the
turbulent state. These new solutions
^{1}

## 2 Discussion

In pipe flow turbulent puffs (Fig. 1(top)) are typically observed in a
Reynolds number regime of approximately .
They result from perturbations of finite amplitude and in experiments if
no great care is taken they will often result from distortions the
flow experiences directly at the inlet. If the inlet is designed
carefully to avoid such disturbances and if the pipe is sufficiently straight and smooth, flows can be held laminar up
to much higher ( the record in experiments is currently at =100000).
For controlled studies of transition it is desirable to start with a
laminar flow and to study its response to a well controlled disturbance
which for example can be a jet of fluid injected for a brief period
through a small hole in the pipe wall. If the amplitude of such a
perturbation is large enough a turbulent puff is created. While directly
after the flow has been perturbed the dynamics depend on the nature of the
disturbance (the puff first has to develop), after 100 to 150 advective time units (measured in D/U, where D is the diameter and U the mean velocity) the resulting puff is independent of the perturbation that
triggered it.

Curiously in this Reynolds number regime turbulence always
remains localized. Even if an extended (axially) part of the pipe
is disturbed the flow will always arrange itself in turbulent
segments (i.e. puffs) which are about to long (the turbulent core excluding the leading edge) and interspersed by
laminar fluid. Vorticity isosurfaces of a turbulent puff at
are shown in Fig. 1(top).
Fig. 1(bottom) shows energy levels in a space time
plot (time from bottom to top) of a simulation of an initially (t=0) fully
turbulent flow. Upon reduction of to 2200 laminar regions (blue)
appear and turbulence becomes confined to localized regions, i.e.
puffs (red vertical stripes in Fig. 1(bottom)).
The direct numerical simulations were carried out with a spectral code
[13]. Fourier modes in the axial and azimuthal direction and finite
difference in the radial are employed and the resolution chosen here is
in radial, axial, and azimuthal directions.
The domain is in the axial direction ( being the diameter)
with periodic boundary conditions.

As pointed out in
[14] at Reynolds numbers close to 2000
turbulent puffs extract energy from the adjacent (actually upstream)
laminar parabolic flow. The plug like turbulent profile in the central
part of the puff is unable to sustain turbulence (or rather to feed
turbulence in the downstream direction) consequently the turbulence
intensity decreases along the leading edge of the puff in the
downstream direction and the flow eventually relaminarises. Due to
the action of viscosity the laminar profile now begins to recover
its parabolic shape so that at sufficient distance a second puff
can be sustained. If on the other hand the distance between puffs
is too short the downstream puff will border onto fluid with a flatter
plug like profile in the upstream direction. Consequently it cannot extract sufficient kinetic
energy from the flow upstream and decays as shown in
[14]. The interaction distance between two puffs is approximately
[15]. As a result turbulent puffs have a minimum spacing
of that same distance. While this argument qualitatively explains
why fully turbulent flow cannot be sustained at these low Re, the
energetic aspects of this process are not understood in full detail.

A key attribute of puffs is their highly chaotic dynamics. This
gives rise to a loss of memory and limits the prediction of
the flows future evolution. To illustrate
the sensitive dependence on initial conditions we simulated two puffs
with velocity fields that only deviate by . As usual for chaotic
systems this deviation grows exponentially and as can be seen form
the energy time series shown in Fig. 2
the signals notably depart
and become completely unrelated after about 200
advective time units (the time the puffs takes to travel 200 pipe
diameters downstream). The loss of predictabiliy becomes especially
clear when one puff suddenly decays (green curve in Fig. 2)
while the other continues unchanged (i.e. the average quantities remain unchanged).

It is a typical feature of puffs that they live for very long
times and decay suddenly (see Fig. 2).
Extensive statistical studies have shown that the survival probability
is exponentially distributed and the decay is memoryless.
This behaviour is in line with the escape from chaotic repellers
observed in lower dimensional systems [20, 21]. Here a chaotic attractor turns into a chaotic saddle
after an unstable periodic orbit within the attractor and one on the
basin boundary collide (unstable-unstable pair bifurcation). Above
the bifurcation point chaotic transients persist for very long times
before they eventually decay.

A similar scenario has recently been observed for pipe flow[12]. In this numerical study the dynamics were confined to a symmetry subspace (imposing a mirror and a 2-fold rotation symmetry with respect to the pipe axis). While this somewhat simplifies the dynamics the flow still exhibits turbulent motion for large enough Re. By following the laminar turbulent boundary (the so called âedge stateâ [16], which in this case is a localised periodic orbit) to lower Re the saddle node bifurcation where the periodic orbits originates was reached (at =1430). The upper branch of this saddle node however is a stable periodic orbit(see Fig. 4) and again localised and its length is comparable to that of puffs.

For increasing Re the orbit
first undergoes a secondary Hopf bifurcation followed by the formation
of a chaotic attractor. This is the point where chaotic motion originates
in this subspace. The basin of the attractor increases rapidly
with until it reconnects with the unstable periodic orbit on the
basin boundary. At this moment the chaotic dynamics turn into long
lived transients (presumably following an unstable-unstable pair bifurcation).
The memoryless nature of the decay and the loss of predictability is a
direct consequence of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions
characteristic for deterministic chaos.

While the classical
picture of turbulence is that of a chaotic attractor, dating back
to the landmark paper of Ruelle and Takens, this approach only
takes the temporal dynamics into account and neglects the spatial
complexity which is however intrinsic to turbulent flows.
The importance of spatial aspects and the spatio temporal
intermittent character of the turbulence transition have been
emphasized in studies of model system [17, 19].
Also the chaotic attractor hypothesis has been questioned in 1980’s
by Crutchfield and Kaneko [18] who propose that chaotic super transients
are more relevant to turbulence. A first observation
supporting this view came from direct numerical simulations of pipe
flows where transients were observed [22]. A number of later
studies were concerned with long lived transients at low Reynolds
numbers in pipe flow [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]
and found that the decay is a memoryless process with a characteristic lifetime which is a function of Re. There was however
no consensus if or if not the lifetimes of individual puffs became
infinite or remained finite. A number of studies proposed that the
turbulent flow decay rates (inverse characteristic lifetimes) scale as
[13, 23, 24]
or at least as a power law
[13].
This view was questioned by Hof [25] who found that instead
implying that turbulence remains transient. In a
refined study for much longer observation times than in any previous
study (spanning almost 8 orders of magnitude in time) was found
to scale super exponentially with [27]
^{2}

A more direct analogy can be drawn
to another model system of coupled chaotic maps which is motivated by
bistable excitable media [31]. A key difference to the above mentioned map models is that here
the susceptibility of a âlaminarâ site to perturbations
from neighbouring chaotic sites (and hence the minimum perturbation
amplitude to trigger chaotic dynamics at a laminar site), decreases
with (where is a the control parameter analogous to the Reynolds number).
This model input reflects experimental observations of pipe flow where
the minimum perturbation amplitude to trigger turbulence was found to
scale with [32, 9, 33].
In the model just like in the experiments localized excited states,
i.e. puffs, with transient lifetimes are observed and with an increase in
the control parameter lifetimes of individual puffs scale faster than
exponential and hence remain transient.

Consequently in pipe flow the increase in the temporal
complexity alone does not lead to sustained turbulence. As
proposed by Moxey and Barkley [34] and later explicitly
shown by Avila et al. [35] turbulence becomes sustained
by a spatial growth process called puff splitting. Puff splitting
is commonly observed at Reynolds numbers of around 2300
[36, 37] and while
here turbulence is still confined to puffs typically to in length
puff sizes fluctuate and can occasionally reach larger values.
In these instances in a small number of cases a segment of turbulent
fluid at the leading edge of the puff can escape further downstream
beyond the puff-puff interaction distance and a new puff develops
here (see Fig. 4). This splitting process leads to an increase in turbulent
fraction.

As shown by Avila et al. [35]
puff splitting is also intrinsically memoryless and can already be
found at much lower Re as previously expected. The characteristic time
for such an event to occur decreases super-exponentially with Re.
The argument for turbulence to become sustained is now straightforward.
If the characteristic time for turbulent puffs to decay is smaller
than the time for new puffs to be created (i.e. by splitting) turbulence will
eventually decay. If on the other hand new puffs are created faster
than existing ones decay in the thermodynamic limit turbulence becomes
sustained. The critical Reynolds number where turbulence changes from
a transient to a sustained state can be estimated by the intersection
point of the characteristic time scales of the two processes shown in
Fig. 5.

This transition is analogous to non equilibrium phase
transitions and as we will argue below, bears close resemblance to directed percolation (DP)
and related contact processes. First speculations about a possible
connection between transition in linearly stable shear flows and DP
date back to Pomeau in 1986 [38].
Just like in DP, pipe flow has a unique absorbing state which is
the laminar flow. Once turbulence has decayed the flow cannot by
itself return to turbulence unless it is disturbed from the outside.
The recent studies of puff decay and splitting [27, 35]
also suggest that the interaction is only short range,
which is another requirement for DP [39]. No observations
indicate that a localized puff would create a second one in a part of
the pipe not adjacent to it (i.e. more than 25 D or so away). Equally
it has never been observed that puffs would influence the lifetimes of other
puffs that are sufficiently far away. These recent studies also infer
that if such a realtion to DP exists a single unit (i.e. a lattice
point in DP) must correspond to a turbulent puff and not for example
to a single vortex. To explore this analogy further hence requires
much larger system sizes allowing to follow the evolution of many turbulent puffs(/spots). While a number of earlier studies (e.g. [40]) looked at such aspects retrospectively the system sizes used were too small.

In a numerical investigation [41] of plane Couette we consequently
chose a narrow but very long domain so that a large
number of turbulent stripes (analogous structure to puffs in pipes)
could be accommodated. This study gave more direct evidence that
the transition is indeed a non-equilibrium continuous phase transition.
Here just like in pipe flow super-exponential lifetime and splitting
statistics were observed for single stripes, and a critical point for the onset of
sustained turbulence could be determined in the same manner described above.
The much shorter time scales at the intersection point between
decay and splitting curves allowed to resolve size distributions
at this point. The distributions of laminar gaps exhibit scale
invariance supporting the proposition of a continuous phase transition.
Also here the same transition scenario between transient localized
chaos and sustained spatio temporal intermittent chaos was found.

Analogies to DP have also been explored in recent theoretical studies,
e.g. [31, 42, 43]
In particular for the coupled map model presented in [31]
close agreement was found to the experimental results for pipe flow: the turbulent state becomes sustained when the splitting outweighs the decay of individual puffs.
In addition the critical exponent for the increase of the turbulent fraction
above onset was found to agree well with the
universal one for DP in dimension.

While at present a final answer to the question if the laminar
turbulence transition is a non-equilibrium phase transition in accordance
with DP is outstanding experiments and numerical simulations to clarify
this question are under way. One of the main challenges here is to
resolve the extremely long time scales relevant in the vicinity of
the transition point (note that characteristic splitting and decay
times in pipes correspond to almost advective time units!).
In this time puffs trave a distance correpsonding to pipe diameters.
Equally an accuracy in the Reynolds number of about 0.1% is
required setting a further challenge for experiments. A further
open issue is the transition from spatially intermittent turbulence
(i.e. puffs) to expanding space filling turbulent structures which
takes place somewhere between Reynolds numbers 2300 and 3000.

### Footnotes

### References

- Reynolds O, An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels, 1883 Proc. R. Soc. London 34 84-99
- Drazin P G and Reid W H, Hydrodynamic Stability, 1981 Cambridge University Press
- Ruelle D and Takens F, On the nature of turbulence, 1971 Comm. Math. Phys. 20 167-192
- Gollub J P and Swinney H L, Onset of Turbulence in a Rotating Fluid , 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 14
- Nagata M, Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: bifurcation from infinity, 1990 J. Fluid Mech. 217 519-527
- Kerswell R R, Recent progress in understanding the transition to turbulence in a pipe, 2005 Nonlinearity 18 R17
- Eckhardt B, Schneider T M, Hof B, and Westerweel J, Turbulence Transition in Pipe Flow, 2007 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39 447-68
- Kawahara G, Uhlmann M, and van Veen L, The Significance of Simple Invariant Solutions in Turbulent Flows, 2012 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44 203-25
- Hof B, van Doorne C W H, Westerweel J, Nieuwstadt F T M, Faisst H, Eckhardt B, Wedin H, Kerswell R R, and Waleffe F, Experimental Observation of Nonlinear Traveling Waves in Turbulent Pipe Flow, 2004 Science 305 1594-1598
- Hof B, van Doorne C W H, Westerweel J, and Nieuwstadt F T M Turbulence Regeneraation in Pipe Flow at Moderate Reynolds Numbers, 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 214502
- de Lozar A, Mellibovsky F, Avila M, and Hof B, Edge State in Pipe Flow Experiments, 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 214502
- Avila M, Mellibovsky F, Roland N, and Hof B, Building blocks of turbulence, 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 224502
- Willis A P and Kerswell R R, Turbulent dynamics of pipe flow captured in a reduced model: puff relaminarisation and localised ’edge’ states, 2009 J. Fluid Mech. 619 213-233
- Hof B, de Lozar A, Avila M, Tu X, and Schneider T M, Eliminating Turbulence in Spatially Intermittent Flows, 2010 Science 327 1491-1494
- Samanta D, de Lozar A, and Hof B, Experimental investigation of laminar turbulent intermittency in pipe flow, 2011 J. Fluid Mech. 681 193â204
- Schneider T M, Eckhardt B, and Yorke J A, Turbulence Transition and the Edge of Chaos in Pipe Flow, 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 034502
- Kaneko K, Spatiotemporal Intermittency in Coupled Map Lattices, 1985 Prog. Theor. Phys. 74 1033-1044
- Crutchfied J.P., Kaneko K, Are Attractors Relevant to turbulence?, 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 2715-2718
- Chaté H and Manneville P, Transition to Turbulence via Spatiotemporal Intermittency, 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 112-115
- Grebogi C, Ott E, and Yorke J A, Fractal Basin Boundaries, Long-Lived Chaotic Transients, and Unstable-Unstable Pair Bifurcation, 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 935-938
- Do Y and Lai Y C Extraordinarily superpersistent chaotic transients, 2004 Europhys. Lett. 67 914-920
- Brosa U, Turbulence without strange attractor, 1989 Journal of Statistical Physics 55 1303-1312
- Faisst H, Turbulence transition in pipe flow, 2003 Ph.D., thesis Universität Marburg
- Peixinho J and Mullin T, Decay of Turbulence in Pipe Flow, 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 094501
- Hof B, Westerweel J, Schneider T M, and Eckhardt B, Finite lifetime of turbulence in shear flows, 2006 Nature 443 59-62
- Willis A P and Kerswell R R, Critical behavior in the relaminarization of localized turbulence in pipe flow, 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 014â501
- Hof B, de Lozar A, Kuik D J, and Westerweel J, Repeller or Attractor? Selecting the Dynamical Model for the Onset of Turbulence in Pipe Flow, 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 214501
- Avila M, Willis A P, and Hof B, On the transient nature of localized pipe flow turbulence, 2010 J. Fluid Mech. 646 127-136
- KUIK D J, Poelma C, and Westerweel J, Quantitative measurement of the lifetime of localized turbulence in pipe flow, 2010 J. Fluid Mech. 645 529-539
- Goldenfeld N, Guttenberg N, and Gioia G, Extreme fluctuations and the finite lifetime of the turbulent state, 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 035304
- Barkley D, Simplifying the complexity of pipe flow, 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 016309
- Hof B, Juel A, and Mullin T, Scaling of the Turbulence Transition Threshold in a Pipe, 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 244502
- Hof B, Transition to turbulence in pipe flow, 2005 In Laminar-Turbulent Transition and Finite Amplitude Solutions, ed. T. Mullin, R.R. Kerslwell, Springer 221-231
- Moxey D and Barkley D, Distinct large-scale turbulent-laminar states in transitional pipe flow, 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 8091
- K. Avila, D. Moxey, A. de Lozar, M. Avila, D. Barkley and B. Hof, (2011), The onset of turbulence in pipe flow, 2011 Science 333 192-196
- Wygnanski I J, Sokolov M, and Friedman D, On transition in a pipe. Part 2. The equilibrium puff, 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 69 283-304
- Nishi M, Ünsal B, Durst F, and Biswas G, Laminar-to-turbulent transition of pipe flows through puffs and slugs, 2008 J. Fluid Mech. 614 425-446
- Pomeau Y, Front Motion, Metastability and Subcritical Bifurcations in Hydrodynamics, 1986 Physica D 23 3-11
- Hinrichen H, Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states, 2000 Adv. Phys. 49:7 815-958
- Bottin S, Chate H,, Statistical analysis of the transition to turbulence in plane Couette flows, 2000 Eur. Phys. J B 6 143-155
- Shi L, Avila M, and Hof B, Scale Invariance at the Onset of Turbulence in Couette Flow, 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 204502
- Sipos M and Goldenfeld N, Directed percolation describes lifetime and growth of turbulent puffs and slugs, 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 035304(R)
- Allhoff K T and Eckhardt B, Directed percolation model for turbulence transition in shear flows, 2012 Fluid Dyn. Res. 44 031201
- Eckert M, The troublesome birth of hydrodynamic stability theory: Sommerfeld and the turbulence problem, 2010 Eur. Phys. J. H 35 29-51