Detection of hidden structures on all scales in amorphous materials and complex physical systems: basic notions and applications to networks, lattice systems, and glasses

Detection of hidden structures on all scales in amorphous materials and complex physical systems: basic notions and applications to networks, lattice systems, and glasses

P. Ronhovde Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA    S. Chakrabarty Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA    M. Sahu Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA    K. K. Sahu Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA Metal Physics and Technology, ETH, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland    K. F. Kelton Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA    N. A. Mauro Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA    Z. Nussinov Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1105, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, CA93106 zohar@wuphys.wustl.edu
Abstract

Recent decades have seen the discovery of numerous complex materials. At the root of the complexity underlying many of these materials lies a large number of possible contending atomic- and larger-scale configurations and the intricate correlations between their constituents. For a detailed understanding, there is a need for tools that enable the detection of pertinent structures on all spatial and temporal scales. Towards this end, we suggest a new method by invoking ideas from network analysis and information theory. Our method efficiently identifies basic unit cells and topological defects in lattices with low disorder and may analyze general amorphous systems to identify candidate natural structures where a clear definition of order is lacking. This general unbiased detection of physical structure does not require a guess as to which of the system properties should be deemed as important and may constitute a natural point of departure for further analysis. The method applies to both static and dynamic systems.

I Introduction

Currently, there are no universal tools for examining complex physical systems in a general and systematic way that fleshes out their pertinent features from the smallest fundamental unit to the largest scale encompassing the entire system. The challenge posed by these complex materials is acute and stands in stark contrast to that in simple ordered systems. In crystals, atomic unit cells replicate to span the entire system. Historically, the regular shapes of some large-scale single crystals were suggested to reflect the existence of an underlying repetitive atomic scale unit cell structure long before modern microscopy and the advent of scattering and tunneling techniques. This simplicity enables an understanding of many solids in great detail. In complex systems, rich new structures may appear on additional intermediate scales. Currently, some of the oldest and, after several millennia, heavily investigated complex materials are glasses. Much more recent challenges include the high temperature cuprate and pnictide superconductors, heavy fermion compounds, and many other compounds including, e.g., the manganites, the vanadates, and the ruthenates. These systems exhibit a rich array of behavior including superconductivity and metal to insulator transitions, rich magnetic characteristic and incommensurate orders, colossal magneto-resistance, orbital orders, and novel transport properties.

A wealth of experimental and numerical data has been accumulated on such systems. The discovery of the salient features in complex materials such as these and more generally of complex large scale physical systems across all spatial resolutions may afford clues for a more accurate understanding. In disparate arenas, important guesswork needs to be invoked as to which of the many features of the physical systems are important and may form the foundation for a detailed analysis. With ever-increasing experimental and computational data, such challenges will only sharpen in the coming years. There is a need for methods that may pinpoint central features on all scales. This works suggests a path towards the solution of this problem in complex amorphous materials. A companion work ronhovde () provides many of the details not provided in this brief summary. An explanation of our core idea require a few concepts from the physics of glasses and network analysis. Towards that end, we review these concepts below.

Ii A paradigm for complex systems: glasses

We illustrate the basic premise of our approach by in this work by focusing on glasses. We begin by, all too briefly, reviewing a central problem– the detection of natural scales and structures in glasses. Complex systems such as glasses are not easy to analyze with conventional theoretical tools. As all interactions between the basic constituents of a gas are weak, a gas is easy to understand and analyze. At the other extreme, although the interactions in regular periodic solids are generally strong, such solids may be characterized by their unit cells and related broken symmetries. The situation is, however, radically different for liquids and glasses. Liquids that are rapidly cooled (“supercooled”) below their melting temperature cannot crystallize and instead at sufficiently low temperatures become “frozen” on experimental times scales in an amorphous state (a “glass”). On supercooling, liquids may veer towards local low energy structures Bernal (); Miracle (), such as icosahedral structures observed in metallic glasses ref:schenkISRO (); ref:keltonfirst (), before being quenched into this amorphous state. Because of the lack of a simple crystalline reference, the general structure of glasses is notoriously difficult to quantify in a meaningful way beyond the very local scales. As such it remains a paradigm for the analysis of structure in complex materials.

The most familiar and oldest technological glasses are the common silicate glasses. More modern glasses include phosphate glasses (biomedical applications), semiconductor chalcogenide glasses (optical recording media), and metallic glasses (which have high tensile strength and are stronger than steel, resistant to corrosion and wear and tear, have magnetic properties, and an extremely high coefficient of restitution). industry (); newscientist (); zrwear (); moli () Existing work on glasses is vast. Glass formers display several key features ref:lubchenkowolynes (). A prominent feature of glass formers is that the viscosity and relaxation times can increase by many orders of magnitude over a narrow temperature range. This slowing of dynamics is not accompanied by the thermodynamic signatures of conventional phase transitions nor a clearly visible pronounced change of spatial structure. The high number of metastable energy states in these systems ref:angelaniPEL (); ref:parisiglasstrans () leads to rich energy landscapesref:angelaniPEL (); ref:parisiglasstrans (); ref:sastry (); ref:debenedetti (); ref:lubchenkoaging (); ref:johnsonMRS (); ref:doyestructures (). A notable facet of the glass transition reflecting structure in the space-time domain is that of “dynamical heterogeneity” dh1 (); dh2 (); dh3 (); dh4 (); dh5 (); dh6 (); dh7 (); dh8 (); dh9 (); overview (): the fact that the dynamics in supercooled liquids is spatially non-uniform. Many theories of glasses, e.g., ref:lubchenkowolynes (); ktw (); tm (); mode_coupling (); davidr (); dyn_con (); ref:nussinovAPT (); ref:tarjusAPT () have been advanced over the years. The theory of random first order transitions (RFOT) investigates mosaics of local configurations ref:lubchenkowolynes (); ktw (). As shown in ref:nussinovAPT (), RFOT is related to theories of “locally preferred structures” ref:nussinovAPT (); ref:tarjusAPT (); dk (); ref:nelsonGF (); ref:sadocmosseri ()- which, as befits their name, also rely on the understanding of natural structures in glasses. Other theories seek a similar quantification of structure. Investigations include spin glass approaches tm () topological defects and kinetic constraints ref:nussinovAPT (); ref:tarjusAPT (); ref:ritortsollich (); ref:cvetkovicNZ (); ref:aharonov (), and numerous ingenious approaches summarized in excellent reviews, e.g., ref:debenedetti (); ref:rev_bert (); chandler (). There is a proof that a growing static length scale must accompany the diverging relaxation times of glass ref:montanariCL (). Some evidence has been found for growing correlation lengths (static and those describing dynamic inhomogeneities) tanaka (); ref:mosayebiCLSGT (); ref:berthierCL (); ref:karmakarsastry (). Correlation lengths were studied via “point-to-set” correlations ps () and pattern repetition size kl (). Current common methods of characterizing structures that center on an atom or a given link include (a) Voronoi polyhedra, ref:aharonov (); sheng (); ref: finney (), (b) Honeycutt-Andersen indices HA (), and (c) bond orientation BO (). A long-standing challenge addressed in this work is the direct detection of structures of general character and scale in amorphous physical systems. Towards this end, we briefly introduce specific concepts from network analysis.

Iii Network analysis

Network analysis has been transformative in generating keen new insights in many areas. The ideas that we introduce here bring to bear network methods that have been so useful in the social and biological sciences to complex physical problems that have not yet been examined before through this prism. To address the challenge of detecting and characterizing structure in complex systems on all scales, we specifically introduce methods from the new growing physics discipline of “community detection” phystoday (). Our key idea is that any complex physical system may be expressed as a network of nodes (e.g., atoms, electrons, etc.) and connecting links. With this representation, we may then apply multiresolution methods ref:rzmultires () from network theory to the analysis of complex materials.

iii.1 Partitions of large systems into weakly coupled elements

Community detection describes the problem of finding clusters–“communities” – groups of nodes with strong internal connections and weak connections between different clusters (see Figs.(1, 2)). The definitions of nodes and edges depend on the system being modeled. Between each pair of nodes and we have an edge weight which may emulate an interaction energy or measured correlation between sites and cov1 (); cov2 (); cov3 (). The nodes belong to communities: . In our particular physics realization, the nodes represent particles and edges their pair-wise interactions. In an ideal decomposition of a large graph into completely disjoint communities (groups of particles), there are no interactions between different communities; the system is effectively that of an “ideal gas” of the decoupled communities of particles. In practice, the task is to find a partition into communities which maximally decouple. Such a separation may afford insight into large physical systems. Many approaches to community detection exist, e.g., fortunato1 (); newman_girvan (); blondel (); newman_fast (); RB (); gudkov (); RosB (); book_comm () and may be invoked in sociology, homeland security, and other networks phystoday (); real1 (); real2 (); real3 (). Two of us earlier developed a method fortunato1 () that does not suffer from the “resolution limit” that hinders many approaches resolution_limit () and that, alongside blondel (), has been applied to investigate systems with more than a billion links. Earlier works describing the method and publicly released code, ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal (); dandan (); my_Web () contained elaborate and precise technical definitions to notions briefly reviewed below.

Figure 1: From ronhovde (). A weighted network with natural (strongly connected) communities. The goal in community detection is to identify such strongly related clusters of nodes. Solid lines depict weighted links corresponding to complimentary or attractive relationships between nodes and (denoted by ) [ in Eq.(1)]. Gray dashed lines depict missing or repulsive edges (denoted by ) []. In both cases, the relative link weight is indicated by the respective line thicknesses.
Figure 2: From ref:rzmultires (). A benchmark demonstrating the accuracy of our method. Left: The benchmark generates networks with or nodes which are assigned to communities of varying sizes specified by a power law distribution parameter . The fraction of edges that each node has connected to nodes outside its own community is . The coordination numbers of the nodes are given by a power law distribution specified by . Right: The solutions by our method (“Absolute Potts Model” (APM)) and those found by simulated annealing (SA) optimizing a popular cost function (“modularity”) are compared to a known answer by the Normalized Mutual Information (NMI). Perfect agreement corresponds to a value of NMI = 1.

iii.2 Our community detection method in a nutshell

A parameter in the Hamiltonian below defines the “resolution” of the system. ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal (); dandan () We generalize our earlier works by adding a background and allowing for continuous weights instead of discrete weights that are prevalent in graph theory. Our (Potts type) Hamiltonian reads

(1)

In Eq. (1), in the inner sum both nodes and belong to the same community . The outer sum is performed over the different communities, The number of communities may be specified from the outset or left arbitrary (as in our multi-resolution method below) and have the algorithm decide by steadily increasing the number of communities for which we have low energy solutions. ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal () Minimizing this Hamiltonian corresponds to identifying strongly connected clusters of nodes. The parameter tunes the relative weights of the connected and unconnected edges and, as advertised above, allows us to vary the targeted scale of the communities sought (the system “resolution”). As seen from Eq.(1), a high value of leads to forbidding energy penalties unless all intra-community nodes “attract” one another [i.e., for all ], whereas would not penalize the inclusion of any additional nodes in a given community and the lowest energy solution generally corresponds to the entire physical system The model for the current application could be further generalized by incorporating -body interactions or correlation functions (such as three or four point correlation functions). Details concerning a greedy minimization of Eq. (1) appear in ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal (). Somewhat better optimization could be obtained with a heat bath algorithm dandan () at a cost of a substantially increased computational effort.

iii.3 Multiresolution network analysis

We addressed multi-scale partitioning ref:rzmultires () by employing information-theory measures info11 (); info2 (); info3 () to examine contending partitions for each system scale. Decreasing , we minimize Eq.(1) with progressively lower intra-community edge densities, effectively “zooming out” toward larger structures. A key construct in our approach is that of replicas– independent solutions of the same problem. This number of replicas may be set by the user; a higher value of leads to more accurate analysis. In earlier work ref:rzmultires () concerning a static network, replicas were related to one another by permuting the numbers of the nodes that form the very same network. However, many other definitions of replicas can be considered (as for the analysis of dynamics in complex physical systems). We can automatically determine all the natural scales of the system by identifying the values of for which these replicas agree most strongly as seen via measures of information theory overlaps. We briefly elaborate on these measures in the current context ref:rzmultires (). The probability for a randomly selected node to be in a community is with the number of nodes in community and the total number of nodes . If there are q communities in a partition A, then the Shannon entropy is . The mutual information between solutions (partitions) found by two replicas A and B is . Here, and are the number of communities in partitions A and B, is the number of nodes of community of partition A that are shared with community of partition B, is the number of nodes in community of partition A, and is the number of nodes in community of partition B. The variation of information between two partitions A and B is given by (). The Normalized Mutual Information is defined as (). A high average NMI indicates high agreement between different replicas. The VI measures the disparity between different replicas. A low VI indicates high agreement between different replicas. A large VI indicates a high variance- large fluctuations between the results found in different replicas. The central result of ref:rzmultires () was that extrema (including plateaux) of information theory overlaps when averaged over all replica pairs, (e.g., the average NMI: and the average VI) indicate the natural network scales. ref:rzmultires () That is, we may find the values for which the average of information theory overlaps such as and over all replica pairs and then determine the minima of Eq. 1 for these (s). The method identifies all “natural” scales of the system. This approach is fast ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal () and has an accuracy that surpasses methods such as simulated annealing (SA) applied to disparate cost functions ref:rzmultires (); ref:rzlocal () (see also Fig. 1). More notably, to our knowledge, this approach is the only one that quantitatively evaluates the “natural” partitions over all scales. Other current approaches to (non-multi scale) community detection include optimizing “modularity”, newman_girvan () dynamics in high dimensions, gudkov () data compression, RosB (). and numerous other ideas. A detailed analysis Ref. fortunato1 () compared the accuracy of several algorithms for non multi-scale community detection. Multiresolution approaches ref:rzmultires (); arenas (); fortunato2 () are far more recent. By relatively trivial extensions, ronhovde () the method of ref:rzmultires () can be applied to the detection of overlapping communities.

Iv Detection of multi-scale structures (static and dynamic) in complex systems

We wish to analyze complex systems to ascertain general hidden structure in a general manner with no prior assumptions as to what the important system properties may be. To achieve this, we cast physical systems as networks representing atoms (or electrons etc.) as nodes and setting the graph edge weights in Eq.(1) to be either (i) pair interaction energies or (ii) experimentally measured inter-node (inter-atomic) correlations. As reviewed in Section III.3, our approach to multi-scale community detection ref:rzmultires () is simple: copies of the community detection problem are given to different “solvers” (or “replicas”). If the starting points of different replicas in the complex energy landscape are different then they will generally arrive at different solutions (different community groupings). If many of these solvers strongly agree about some features of the solution, then these aspects are more likely to be correct manifesting in extrema of their information theory correlations-ref:rzmultires (). When applying this to a physical system, the replicas can be chosen to be copies of the system all at the same time in order to detect natural static scales and structures (panel (a) of Fig. 3). Alternatively, the replicas may be copies of the system at different times as in panel (b) of Fig. 3 enabling the detection of general spatio-temporal correlations. In both the static and dynamic cases, we find the extrema of the information theory correlations as a function of the ”resolution” parameter in our hamiltonian Eq. (1). Once these extremal values of are found, the ground states of Eq.(1) determine the pertinent structures as in ref:rzmultires (). Multiple extrema in the information theory correlations suggest multiple relevant length/time scales. In this way, our analysis is not limited to the assumption of one or two specific correlation lengths relative to which scaling type analysis may be done or what correlation function should be constructed, etc. Rather, viable natural scales of the system appear as extrema in the calculation of the direct information theory overlaps.

Figure 3: From ronhovde (). Left: our replica construction for the physical system at a “static” time (with no time separation between replicas). Right: a similar set of replicas separated by a time between successive replicas. We generate a model network for each replica using the potential energy between the atoms as the respective edge weights and then solve each replica independently by minimizing Eq. (1) at a given value of . We then use information measures ref:rzmultires () to evaluate how strongly pairs of replicas agree on the ground states of Eq.(1).

V Benchmarks: crystals, crystals with defects, and spin systems

Before applying our method to complex systems, we need to make sure that it yields sensible results in simple physical cases aside from the standard networks such as those of Fig. 2. Hence, we tested it for: (i) Lattices viewed as graphs, (ii) Lattices with defects, and (iii) Defects in spin models.
(i) Lattices viewed as graphs: Fig. 4 shows our analysis. On the left are the result of our multi-resolution analysis. Information theory plateaus correspond to solutions on different scales (). Transitions between different solutions appear as cascades in the information theory measures. On the smallest scale (high ), our approach recognizes the basic units of the lattices.
(ii) Lattices with defects: In Fig. 5, we examine a monatomic Lennard-Jones (LJ) system (whose ground state is a triangular lattice with inter-particle spacing given by the LJ minimum) in which defects in the form of vacancies were inserted. The system is broken into clusters such that the defects tend to congregate on boundaries between different clusters.
(iii) Defects in spin systems: We investigated Ising systems. In Eq. (1), we set to be the nearest neighbor bond energies in the Ising model. The multi-resolution analysis led to a cascade of structures similar to that in (i) up to the largest domain wall. Partitions into nearly perfect Ising domain walls sharply corresponded to VI maxima (and NMI minima). This occurs as the region near the domain walls is the one which experiences the largest fluctuations in possible assignment to the two bordering domains that it delineates. These benchmark results above are reassuring: the systems “find” their natural structures.

Figure 4: From ronhovde (). Multiresolution analysis of a square lattice with periodic boundary conditions treated as an unweighted graphs as in earlier analysis ref:rzmultires (): Neighbors have an initial weight of in Eq. 1 and non-neighbors have an initial weight . Left: The panels show the information theoretic overlaps between the different replicas when averaged over all replica pairs (see text). These are the variation of information (VI), mutual information (I), normalized mutual information (), entropy (H) and number of clusters (q) in individual partitions. Right: Corresponding partition of the lattice. We use the algorithm described at . In this configuration, there were clusters with squares, triads, and dyads which indicates that square configuration dominates the partition, and it shows how our algorithm can naturally identify the basic unit cells of the square lattice.
Figure 5: From ronhovde (). Left: A plot for the multiresolution analysis of a 2D triangular LJ lattice with periodic boundary conditions. The legend for the information theory quantities is as in earlier plots. Edges are weighted according the LJ potential. there are two preferred regions, a small peak on the left and a large plateau on the right, where the peak here corresponds to the largest possible “natural” clusters. Right: We use the algorithm at (the left peak) to solve the system. Our method generally places defects near the boundaries of the communities in order to minimize the energy cost.

Vi Applications to complex amorphous systems

We studied amorphous systems via different approaches starting with that of community detection In particular, in analyzing complex structures we allowed in some cases for a multiple membership of a node in different communities by further replicating each node so as to enable overlapping partitions. We used both interaction energies as well as measured pair correlations as weights in our analysis. We investigated three different cases: (i) Static and dynamic structures in the Kob-Andersen (KA) LJ glass, (ii) Static atomic structures from Reverse Monte Carlo directly applied to experimental measurements of ZrPt, and (iii) Dynamic structures in a new model amorphous system that emulates experimental results on AlYFe. The precise forms of the potentials in (i) and (iii) are of little importance in the broader context of the method. The goal is to analyze amorphous systems and find their natural sub-structures rather than where each atom happens to be which constitutes far too detailed and hence useless information. At low temperatures, we found larger and more pronounced compact structures than those at higher temperature.
(i) We studied the glass-forming KA : binary liquid ref:kobandersenOne (); ref:valdesMixing () by Molecular Dynamics (MD) ref:imd () to simulate an atom system. The system is initialized at a temperature (in the units of ref:kobandersenOne (); ref:valdesMixing ()) and evolved for a time that is long compared to the caging time. We save high temperature configurations separated by time intervals of the order of the caging time ref:kobandersenOne (). The system is then rapidly quenched to - well below the glass transition temperature of the KA-LJ system. The system is consequently evolved at this lower temperature and again we save configurations separated by the original time interval . Each of the copies of the system constitutes a replica within the high/low temperature problem. We then employed these replicas in our multi-resolution analysis. The results for the low temperature system are shown in Fig. 6. Stable, relatively compact, clusters correspond to the NMI maxima. Additional large scale domains in the low temperature system at extrema correspond to a local NMI minimum (coincident with a VI maximum) for small .
(ii) Atomic configurations that are consistent with the experimentally determined scattering data for liquid ZrPt nakamura (); saida (); sordelet (); wang () were generated using conventional Reverse Monte Carlo methods (RMC) mcgreevy (); keen (); kim (). It is notable that RMC analysis of experimental data, unlike MD simulations, is not limited by requisite true long equilibration times in MD simulations. A static non-overlapping community detection partitioning with the experimentally measured partial pair correlations substituting for in Eq. (1) led to extremely large clusters, at a temperature below the liquidus (the maximum temperature at which crystals coexist with the melt). The results of the analysis for stable clusters are shown in Fig. 7.
(iii) Our potential energy functions for AlYFe were computed using the techniques of ref:mihalkovicEOPP () employing ab initio results using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) vasp (); vasp1 (); vasp2 (). The calculated structure factors were compared to experimental data sahu (). The potentials are of the form , with the parameters depending on the specific types of atom pairs (i.e., Al-Al, Al-Y, …) (see ronhovde () and, in particular, table 1 therein for tabulated values of for the potentials; further details will be provided in effpotentials ()). In Figs. (8,9), we provide the structures of AlYFe that our method finds at the two temperatures of T=300 K and T=1500 K. We found that for a fixed configuration, the community detection Hamiltonian of Eq.(1) with random edge weights generally exhibits a finite temperature spin-glass type transition dandan () (whereas for regular lattices Eq.(1) is the standard Potts model which exhibits critical or first order transitions (e.g., a critical transition for on a square lattice and a first order transition for )). The structures found are not unique and reflect a configurational entropy (different partitions may be found for a given value of the resolution parameter that are similar in their overall scale but different in precise detail and identities of the nodes). These results may flesh out a facet of the glass transition- as the system is supercooled- the effective couplings become quenched. We re-iterate that, as noted above, detecting the optimally decoupled structures in more random systems such as those that may describe the deeply supercooled liquid constitutes a spin-glass problem. dandan () The spin-glass transition seen in the community detection problem for a fixed initial atomic configuration (as a function of temperature) enhances the change of partitions already evident in minimizing the Hamiltonian for the different initial atomic coordinates for the system at different temperatures (see, e.g., the larger structures in the low temperature system of Fig. 8 vis a vis the smaller structures with much fainter information theory correlations at the higher temperature shown in Fig. 9).

Figure 6: From ronhovde (). A three dimensional KA LJ system (see text). Here we allow for overlapping nodes. The information overlaps at left show a maximum NMI () and plateau for other information theory measures at (i). Right: We show the typical clusters found.
Figure 7: Left: Information theory measures applied to the ZrPt system (see text) of atoms. The computation here were done with in Eq. 1 replaced by the correlation functions for all different pair types (Zr-Zr, Pt-Pt, Zr-Pt) for the RMC data inferred from scattering measurements at 250K below the liquidus (1200K). Note the sharp extrema at (i). Right: The corresponding partition. Clusters are assigned different colors.
Figure 8: : The result of our community detection analysis applied to AlYFe at a temperature of T = 300K. The panels at left (a,b) show the information theoretic overlaps between the different replicas when averaged over all replica pairs (see text). On the right (c), we highlight the spatial structures corresponding to the NMI maximum/VI minimum.
Figure 9: Left: The result of our community detection analysis as applied to AlYFe at a temperature T = 1500K. When comparing the information theory replica overlaps and structure with Fig. 8, it is evident that at higher temperatures, the system is more random. Right: corresponding structures found at information theory extrema.

Vii Discussion

The detection of structure in general systems is an important problem. We outlined a “first principles” network analysis method to ascertain correlations and structures where traditional tools of analysis meet with difficulty. With the aid of this method, we were able to detect hard to ascertain structures in complex materials such as low temperature glasses. Aside from the canonical LJ systems used for simulations of glass former and the more specific (including experimentally driven) efforts for the detection of metallic glass systems analyzed here, there are numerous other arenas which may profit from such a capability.

We mention a few of these in passing and speculate on possible applications of our methods therein. Omnipresent memory effects and hysteresis appear in amorphous glass systems. memory () These properties are of direct technological importance for data storage. “Phase-change materials” in the form of chalcogenide glasses appear in HD-DVD Blu-ray devices. These devices require materials that are good glass formers, exhibit large difference in their reflectivity between the amorphous and crystalline states, and retain their amorphous state under ambient conditions. The different reflectivities of the amorphous and crystalline states allow reading discs by measuring reflected laser light. wut (); van (); john (); chal () Materials similar to GeSbTe have these desired properties. Current technological progress hinges on vigorous testing of related materials in the hope of eventual improvement. Much research has also, in recent years, been done on poly-crystalline Silicon, thin films of poly-crystalline CdTe, and similar materials which can be used for photovoltaic cells. cdte () A method such as that presented here may similarly examine the multi-scale structure of these materials and evolution during processing. The basic rudiments of the method can be generally applied to general systems having exact or effective interactions between their constituents (liquids, plasmas, etc.). A general classical physical system may be represented in terms of a (dynamic) network whose links, loops, etc. encode the measured multi-particle correlations and/or interactions. Although we focused in this work on real space representations, analysis similar to that outlined in this work may be done for nodes that describe the system in Fourier or other spaces.

We conclude with more speculative remarks about viable extensions of our method to electronic and other systems. By attempting to finding an optimal partition into uncorrelated units as we have done for the classical systems, a multi-resolution analysis similar to devised here (and in our more elaborate companion work ronhovde ()) might also be applied to quantum systems where the nodes need not conform to localized particles. In the quantum arena, when feasible, a direct product representation in terms of decoupled degrees of freedom (and related matrix product states mps () when these efficiently describe cluster states) may be quite potent. The decomposition into optimally decoupled clusters is indeed what the community detection approach seeks to emulate in the classical systems that we have examined above. Applications to electronic systems such as electronic glasses electron_glass () are natural. Other specific applications may offer insights into the long sought diverging length scales (or lack thereof) in strongly correlated electronic systems. In many of these systems, the dynamics suggests the existence of a zero temperature quantum critical point subir (); my_review () yet, generally, there are no clear experimental indications of a diverging length scale. Numerous works, e.g., science_qcp (); my_nature (), suggest that a quantum critical point is also present in optimally doped high temperature superconductors. Competing orders and multiple low energy states may lead to glassy response. dielectric () As in classical glasses, divergent time scales and various non-uniform structures appear in complex electronic materials. These structures are seen by crisp scanning tunneling microscope (STM) images and other probes. davis (); jan (); rmp_steve (); vojta (); lawler () The character of the low temperature phases remains a mystery. Generally, a multi-resolution approach similar to the one outlined in this work may also be of use for theoretically analyzing general non-uniform systems where there are no obvious natural building blocks to consider in performing real space renormalization group (RG) type calculations and constructing coarse grained effective theories.

Viii Acknowledgments

We are indebted to M. Widom and M. Mihalkovič for help with effective atomic potentials and to ongoing work effpotentials () on the construction of these for several metallic glass formers. ZN also wishes to thank G. Tarjus and P. G. Wolynes for critical reading and remarks, the Lorentz Center for hosting a highly inspirational workshop (summer 2008), the KITP, and to the CMI of WU for partial support.

References

  • (1) P. Ronhovde, S. Chakrabarty, M. Sahu, K. K. Sahu, K. F. Kelton, N. Mauro, and Z. Nussinov, “Detecting hidden spatial and spatio-temporal structures in glasses and complex systems by multiresolution network clustering”, arXiv:1101.xxxx (2011)
  • (2) J. D. Bernal, “Geometry of the structure of monatomic liquids”, Nature 185, 68Ð70 (1960).
  • (3) D. B. Miracle, W. S. Sanders, and O. N. Senkov, “The influence of efficient atomic packing on the constitution of metallic glasses”, Philos. Mag. 83, 2409-2428 (2003); D. B. Miracle, “A structural model for metallic glasses”, Nature Materials 3, 697-702 (2004); D. B. Miracle, T. Egami, M. K. Flores, and K. F. Kelton, “Structural aspects of metallic glasses”, MRS Bulletin 32, 629-634 (2007)
  • (4) T. Schenk, D. Holland-Moritz, V. Simonet, R. Bellissent, and D. M. Herlach, “Icosahedral Short-Range Order in Deeply Undercooled Metallic Melts”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 075507 (2002)
  • (5) K. F. Kelton, G. W. Lee, A. K. Gangopadhyay, R. W. Hyers, T. J. Rathz , J. R. Rogers, M. B. Robinson and D. S. Robinson, “First X-Ray Scattering Studies on Electrostatically Levitated Metallic Liquids: Demonstrated Influence of Local Icosahedral Order on the Nucleation Barrier”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 195504 (2003)
  • (6) A. Bellisario, “Miracle Metal: How Glassy Metals will Define Manufacturing in the 21th Century”, Industry Week, Dec. 9, 2009
  • (7) C. Zandonella, “Metallic glass: A drop of the hard stuff”, New Scientist 2493, (April 2, 2005)
  • (8) M. Z. Ma, R. P. Liu, Y. Xiao, D. C. Lou, L. Liu, Q. Wang, and W. K. Wang, “Wear resistance of Zr-based bulk metallic glass applied in bearing rollers”, Materials Science and Engineering A 386, 326-330 (2004)
  • (9) M. Li, J. Eckert, L. Kecskes, and J. J. Lewandowski, “Introduction for JMR Focus Issue in Mechanical Properties and Metallic Glasses and Applications”, J. of Materials Research 22, No. 2, 255-257 (2007)
  • (10) V. Lubchenko and P. G. Wolynes, “Theory of Structural Glasses and Supercooled Liquids”, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 235-266 (2007)
  • (11) L. Angelani, Giorgio Parisi, G. Ruocco, and G. Viliani, “Potential energy landscape and long-time dynamics in a simple model glass”, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1681-1291 (2000)
  • (12) Giorgio Parisi, “The physics of the glass transition”, Physica A 280, 115-124 (2000)
  • (13) S. Sastry, P. G. Debenedetti, and F. H. Stillinger, “Signatures of distinct dynamical regimes in the energy landscape of a glass-forming liquid” , Nature 393, 554-557 (1998)
  • (14) P. G. Debenedetti and F. H. Stillinger, “Supercooled liquids and the glass transition”, Nature 410, 259-267 (2001)
  • (15) V. Lunchenko and P. G. Wolynes, “Theory of aging in structural glasses”, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 2852-2865 (2004)
  • (16) W. L. Johnson, M. D. Demetriou, J. S. Harmon, M. L. Lind , and K. Samwer “Rheology and Ultrasonic Properties of Metallic Glass-Forming Liquids: A Potential Energy Landscape Perspective”, MRS Bulletin 32, 644-650 (2007)
  • (17) Jonathan P. K. Doye, David J. Wales, Fredrik H. M. Zetterling, and Mikhail Dzugutov, “The favored cluster structures of model glass formers” J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2792-2799 (2008)
  • (18) M. D. Ediger, “Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids”, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 99 (2000).
  • (19) R. Richert, “Heterogeneous dynamics in liquids: fluctuations in space and time”, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat. 14, R703 (2002).
  • (20) E. R. Weeks, J. C. Crocker, A. C. Levitt, A. Schofield, and D. A. Weitz, “Three dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition”, Science 287, 627 (2000).
  • (21) W. Kob, C. Donati, S. J. Plimpton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, “Dynamical Heterogeneities in a Supercooled Lennard Jones Liquid”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2827 (1997)
  • (22) C. Donati, J. F. Douglas, W. Kob, S. J. Plimpton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, “String like cooperative motion in a supercooled liquid”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2338 (1998)
  • (23) S. C. Glotzer, “Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in liquids: insight from simulations”, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 274, 342 (2000)
  • (24) Y. Gebremichael, T. B. Schroder, F. W. Starr, and S. C. Glotzer, “Spatially correlated dynamics in a simulated glass forming polymer melts”, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051503 (2001)
  • (25) S. A. Reinsberg, A. Heuer, B. Doliwa, H. Zimmermann, and H. W. Spiess, “Comparative study of the NMR length scale of dynamic heterogeneities of three different glass formers”, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 307, 208 (2002).
  • (26) J.-X. Lin, C. Reichhardt, Z. Nussinov, L. P. Pryadko, and C. J. Olson Reichhardt, “Heterogeneities and topological defects in two dimensional pinned liquids”, Physical Review E 73, article no. 061401 (2006)
  • (27) L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J-P. Bouchaud, and R. L. Jack, “Overview of different characterizations of dynamic heterogeneity”, arXiv:1009.4665 (39 pages) [2010]
  • (28) T.R. Kirkpatrick, D. Thirumalai, and P. G. Wolynes, “Scaling concepts for the dynamics of viscous liquids near an ideal glassy state”, Physical Review A 40, 1045-1054 (1989)
  • (29) M. Tarzia and M. A. Moore, “Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses”, Physical Review E 75, article no. 031502 (2007) [5 pages].
  • (30) W. Gotze, “Recent tests of the mode coupling theory for glassy dynamics”, J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 11, A1 (1999)
  • (31) P. Mayer, K. Miyazaki, and D.R. Reichman, “Cooperativity Beyond Caging: Generalized Mode Coupling Theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 095702 (2006) [4 pages]
  • (32) J. P. Garrahan, “Glassiness through the emergence of effective dynamical constraints in interacting systems”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 1571-1579 (2002)
  • (33) Z. Nussinov, “Avoided phase transitions and glassy dynamics in geometrically frustrated systems and non-Abelian theories”, Phys. Rev. B 69, 014208 (2004)
  • (34) G. Tarjus, S. A. Kivelson, Z. Nussinov, and P. Viot, “The frustration-based approach of supercooled liquids and the glass transition: a review and critical assessment”, J Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, R1143-R1182 (2005)
  • (35) D. Kivelson, S. A. Kivelson, X. Zhao, Z. Nussinov, and G. Tarjus, “A Thermodynamic Theory of Supercooled Liquids”, Physica A 219, 27 (1995)
  • (36) David R. Nelson, “Defects and Geometry in Condensed Matter Physics”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
  • (37) J. F. Sadoc and R. Mosseri, “Geometrical Frustration”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
  • (38) F. Ritort and P. Sollich, “Glassy dynamics of kinetically constrained models”, Adv. Phys. 52, 219-342 (2003)
  • (39) V. Cvetkovic, Z. Nussinov, and J. Zaanen, “Topological kinematic constraints: quantum dislocations and the glide principle”, Philos. Mag. 86, 2995-3020 (2006)
  • (40) E. Aharonov, E. Bouchbinder, H. G. E. Hentschel, V. Ilyin, N. Makedonska, I. Procaccia, and N. Schupper, “Direct identification of the glass transition: Growing length scale and the onset of plasticity”, Euro. Phys. Lett. 77, 56002 (2007) [5 pages],
  • (41) Ludovic Berthier and Giulio Biroli, “A theoretical perspective on the glass transition and nonequilibrium phenomena in disordered materials”, arXiv: 1011.2578 (2010) [68 pages]
  • (42) D. Chandler and J. P. Garrahan, “Dynamics on the Way to Forming Glass: Bubbles in Space-Time”, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 191-217 (2010)
  • (43) A. Montanari and G. Semerjian, “Rigorous Inequalities between Length and Time Scales in Glassy Systems” Journal of Statistical Physics 125, 23-54 (2006).
  • (44) H. Tanaka, T. Kawasaki, H. Shintani, and K. Watanabe, “Critical-like behaviour of glass-forming liquids”, Nature Materials 9, 324-331 (2010)
  • (45) M. Mosayebi, E. D. Gado, P. Iig, and H. C. Ottinger, “Probing a Critical Length at the Glass Transition”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 205704 (2010)
  • (46) L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, L. Cipelletti, D. El Masri, D. L’Hote, F. Ladieu, and M. Pierno, ‘Direct Experimental Evidence of a Growing Length Scale Accompanying the Glass Transition”, Science 310, 1797 (2005).
  • (47) S. Karmakar, C. Dasgupta, and S. Sastry, “Growing length and time scales in glass-forming liquids”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3675 (2010).
  • (48) J.-P. Bouchaud and G. Biroli, “On the Adams-Gibbs-Kirkpatrick-Thirumalai-Wolynes scenario for the viscosity increase in glasses”, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7347 (2004)
  • (49) J. Kurchan and D. Levine, “Correlation length for amorphous systems”, e-print arXiv:0904.4850 (2009).
  • (50) H. W. Sheng, W. K. Luo, F. M. Alamgir, J. M. Bai, and E. Ma, “Atomic packing and short-to-medium-range order in metallic glasses”, Nature 439, 419-425 (2006)
  • (51) J. L. Finney, “Random packings and the structure of simple liquids. I. The Geometry of Random Close packing”, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 319, 1539, 479-493 (1970)
  • (52) J. Dana Honeycutt and Hans C. Andersen, “Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters”, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4950-4963 (1987)
  • (53) P. J. Steinhardt, D. R. Nelson and M. Ronchetti, “Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses”, Phys. Rev. B 28, 784-805 (1983)
  • (54) M. E. J. Newman, “The physics of networks”, Phys. Today 61, 33-38 (2008)
  • (55) P. Ronhovde and Z. Nussinov, “Multiresolution community detection for megascale networks by information-based replica correlations”, Phys. Rev. E 80, 016109 (2009)
  • (56) J. Hopcroft, O. Khan, B. Kulis B, and B. Selman, “The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 10, 5266-5273 (2004).
  • (57) G. Palla, A. L. Barabasi, and T. Vicsek, “Quantifying social group evolution”, Nature 446, 664-667 (2007).
  • (58) C. R. Shalizi, M. F. Camperi, and K. L. Klinkner, “Discovering functional communities in dynamical networks”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4503, 140-157 (2007).
  • (59) A. Lancichinetti and S. Fortunato, “Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis”, Phys. Rev. E 80, 056117 (2009).
  • (60) M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, “Finding and evaluating community structure in networks”, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004) (15 pages)
  • (61) V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks”, J. Stat. Mech. 10, P10008 (2008) (12 pages)
  • (62) M. E. J. Newman, “Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks”, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066133 (2004) [5 pages].
  • (63) J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt, “Statistical mechanics of community detection”,Phys. Rev. E 74, 016110 (2006).
  • (64) V. Gudkov, V. Montelaegre, S. Nussinov, and Z. Nussinov, “Community detection in complex networks by dynamical simplex evolution”, Phys. Rev. E 78, article no. 016113 (2008) [7 pages].
  • (65) M. Rosvall and C. T. Bergstrom, “Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure”, Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1118-1123 (2008).
  • (66) Book chapter by U. Brandes, D. Dellng, M. Gaertler, R. Gorke, M. Hoefer, Z. Nikoloski, and D. Wagner, “On fnding geaph clusterings with maximum modularity” in the book “Graph-thoeretic concepts in computer science”, Lecture notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74839-7 (2007).
  • (67) E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltavi, and A.-L. Barabasi, “Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks”, Science 297, 1551-1555 (2002).
  • (68) J. J. Xu and H. Chen, “CrimeNet Explorer: A Framework for Criminal Network Knowledge Discovery”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 23, 201-226 (2005).
  • (69) Il-Chu Moon and Kathleen M. Carley, “Modeling and Simulating Terrorist Networks in Social and Geospatial Dimensions”, IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 40-49 (2007) .
  • (70) S. Fortunato and M. Berthelemy, “Resolution limit in community detection”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 36-41 (2007)
  • (71) Peter Ronhovde and Zohar Nussinov, “An Improved Potts Model Applied to Community Detection”, Physical Review E 81, 046114 (2010)
  • (72) D. Hu, P. Ronhovde, and Z. Nussinov, “Phase transition in the community detection problem: spin-glass type and dynamic perspectives”, arXiv:1008.2699 (2010)
  • (73) http://www.physics.wustl.edu/zohar/communitydetection/
  • (74) A. L. N. Fred and A. K. Jain, “Robust Data Clustering”, 2003 Proc. IEEE Comp. Soc. Conf. on Comp. Vis. Pattern Recog. 2, 128-133 (2003).
  • (75) M. Meila, “Comparing clusterings - an information based distance”, J. Multivariate Anal. 98, 873-895 (2007).
  • (76) L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, J. Duch, and A. Arenas, “Comparing community structure identification”, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 9, P09008 (2005).
  • (77) A. Arenas, A. Fernandez, and S. Gomez, “Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels”, New. J. Phys. 10, 053039 (2008).
  • (78) S. Fortunato, “Community detection in graphs”, Physics Reports 486, 75-174 (2010).
  • (79) J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, “Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors”, Nature 375, 561-563 (1995)
  • (80) Walter Kob and Hans C. Andersen, “Testing mode-coupling theory for a supercooled binary Lennard-Jones mixture: The van Hove correlation function”, Physical Review E 51, 4626-4641 (1995)
  • (81) L.-C. Valdes, F. Affouard, M. Descamps, and J. Habasaki, “Mixing effects in glass-forming Lennard-Jones mixtures”, Journal of Chemical Physics, 130, 154505 (6 pages), (2009)
  • (82) J. Stadler, R. Mikulla, and H. R. Trebin, “IMD: A software package for molecular dynamics studies on parallel computers”, International Journal of Modern Physics C 8, 1131-1140 (1997)
  • (83) T. Nakamura, E. Matsubara, M. Sakurai, M. Kasai, A. Inoue, and Y. Waseda, ”Structural study in amorphous Zr-noble metal (Pd, Pt and Au) alloys”, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 312-314, 517 (2002).
  • (84) Junji Saida, Keiji Itoh, Shigeo Sato, Muneyuki Imafuku, Takashi Sanada, and Akihisa Inoue, “Evaluation of the local environment for nanoscale quasicrystal formation in ZrPt glassy alloy using Voronoi analysis”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 375104 (2009)
  • (85) D. J. Sordelet, R. T. Ott, M. Z. Li, S. Y. Wang, C. Z. Want, M. F. Besser, A. C. Y. Liu, and M. J. Kramer, “Structure of Zr Pt () Metallic Glasses”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 39A, 1908-1916 (2008)
  • (86) S. Y. Wang, C. Z. Wang, M. Z. Li, L. Huang, R. T. Ott, M. J. Kramer, D. J. Sordelet, and K. M. Ho, “Short- and medium-range order in a ZrPt glass: Experimental and simulation studies”, Phys. Rev. B 78, 184204 (2008) [9 pages]
  • (87) R. L. McGreevy, “Understanding liquid structures”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3 F9 (1991)
  • (88) D. A. Keen and R. L. McGreevy, “Structural modelling of glasses using reverse Monte Carlo simulation”, Nature 344, 423-5 (1990)
  • (89) T. H. Kim and K. F. Kelton, “Structural study of supercooled liquid transition metals”, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 054513 (2007) [7 pages].
  • (90) Marek Mihalkovič, C. L. Henley, M. Widom, and P. Ganesh, “Empirical oscillating potentials for alloys from ab-initio fits”, arXiv:cond-mat.mtrl-sci/0802.2926 (2008)
  • (91) http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/
  • (92) “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals”, G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993)
  • (93) G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set”, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169-11186 (1996)
  • (94) K. K. Sahu, N. A. Mauro, L. Longstreth-Spoor, Z. Nussinov, M. K. Miller, and K. F. Kelton, “Phase Separation in AlYFe Glasses”, Acta Materialia 58, 4199 (2010)
  • (95) S. Chakrabarty, M. Widom, M. Mihalkovič, K. F. Kelton, and Z. Nussinov, in preparation
  • (96) G. Bertotti, Hysteresis and Magnetism for Physicists, Materials Scientists, and Engineers (Academic Press, New York, 1998); L C. Struick., Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1978; Young A. P. (Editor), Spin Glasses and Random Fields, Series on Directions in Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 12 (World Scientific, Singapore) 1998.
  • (97) M. Wuttig, and N. Yamada, “Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage”, Nature Materials 6, 824-832 (2007).
  • (98) L. van Pieterson, M. H. A. Lankhorst, M. van Schijndel, A. E. T. Kuiper, and J. H. J. Rosen, “Phase-change recording materials with a growth-dominated crystallization mechanism: A materials overview”, Journal of Applied Physics, 97(8), 083520 (2005)
  • (99) S. Hudgens and B. Johnson, “Overview of phase-change chalcogenide nonvolatile memory technology”, MRS Bulletin, 29, 829-832 (2004); M. H. R. Lankhorst, B.W.S.M.M. Ketelaars, and R.A.M. Wolters, “Low-cost and nanoscale non-volatile memory concept for future silicon chips”, Nature Materials 4, 347-352 (2005); M. Wuttig and C. Steimer, “Phase change materials: From material science to novel storage devices”, Applied Physics A 87, 411-417 (2007)
  • (100) “Progress in Optics”, Volume 36, by E. Wolf (Elsevier, North Holland (1996)).
  • (101) J. Britt and C. Ferekides, “Thin film CdS/CdTe solar cell with 15.8% efficiency”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2851 (1993) (2 pages)
  • (102) D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf and J. I. Cirac, “Matrix Product State Representations”, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
  • (103) A. Amir, Y. Oreg, and Y. Imry, “Electron Glass Dynamics”, Ann. Rev. Cond. Mat. Phys., to appear (2011), preprint available at arXiv:1010.5767 (38 pages)
  • (104) S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  • (105) C. M. Varma, Z. Nussinov, and W. van Saarloos, “Singular Fermi Liquids”, Physics Reports 361(5-6), 267-417 (2002).
  • (106) T. Valla, A. V. Fedorov, P. D. Johnson, B. O. Wells, S. L. Hulbert, Q. Li, G. D. Gu, and N. Koshizuka, “Evidence for Quantum Critical Behavior in the Optimally Doped Cuprate BiSrCaCuO”, Science 285, 2110-2113 (1999)
  • (107) D. van der Marel, H.J.A. Molegraaf, J. Zaanen, Z. Nussinov, F. Carbone, A. Damascelli, H. Eisaki, M. Greven, P.H. Kes, and M. Li, “Quantum critical behavior in a high-Tc superconductor”, Nature 425, 271-274 (2003).
  • (108) T. Park, Z. Nussinov, K. R. A. Hazzard, V. A. Sidorov, A. V. Balatsky, J. L. Sarrao, S.-W. Cheong, M. F. Hundley, S. Lee, Q.-X. Jia, and J. D. Thompson, “Novel Dielectric Anomaly in Hole Doped LaCuLiO and LaSrNiO Insulators: Signature of an Electronic Glass State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (article no.) 017002 [4 pages] (2005).
  • (109) Y. Kohsaka, C. Taylor, K. Fujita, A. Schmidt, C. Lupien, T. Hanaguri, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Eisaki, H. Takagi, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, “An Intrinsic Bond-Centered Electronic Glass with Unidirectional Domains in Underdoped Cuprates”, 1380 - 1385 (2007); T.-M. Chuang, M. P. Allan, Jinho Lee, Yang Xie, Ni Ni, S. L. Budko, G. S. Boebinger, P. C. Canfield, and J. C. Davis, “Nematic Electronic Structure in the ‘Parent’ State of the Iron-Based Superconductor Ca(FeCo)As”, Science 327, 181-184 (2010)
  • (110) J. Zaanen, “High-temperature superconductivity: Stripes defeat the Fermi liquid”, Nature 404, 714-715 (2000)
  • (111) S.A. Kivelson, I. P. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan. J. M. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik, and C. Howald, “How to detect fluctuating stripes in the high-temperature superconductors”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1201- 1241 (2003)
  • (112) A. Wollny and M. Vojta, “Photoemission signatures of valence-bond stripes in cuprates: Long-range vs. short-range order”, Physica B 404 , 3079-3084 (2009)
  • (113) M. J. Lawler, K. Fujita, Jhinhwan Lee, A. R. Schmidt, Y. Kohsaka, Chung Koo Kim, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, J. C. Davis, J. P. Sethna, and Eun-Ah Kim, “Intra-unit-cell electronic nematicity of the high-Tc copper oxide pseudogap states”, Nature 466 , 347-351 (2010)
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
50827
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description