Design of nonlinear optical response of multipole-type excitons by film thickness and incident pulse width

Design of nonlinear optical response of multipole-type excitons
by film thickness and incident pulse width

Takashi Kinoshita    Hajime Ishihara Department of Physics and Electronics, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
July 12, 2019
Abstract

We theoretically investigate the nonlinear optical pulse responses of excitons in a thin film where the excitonic center-of-mass motion is confined. A large interaction volume between excitons and radiation yields particular coupled states with radiative decay times reaching several femto-seconds. By considering two polarization directions of light, we reveal that these fast-decay modes dominantly survive in an optical Kerr spectra even under a massive nonradiative damping meV. The results clearly show that there is an optimal combination of the incident pulse width and the film thickness for maximizing the integrated intensity of nonlinear signals.

pacs:

I Introduction

An attractive feature of nanostructures is their great accessibility to single quantum states due to their apparent quantization, which allows us to develop unconventional photo-functions owing to the flexible controllability of the light-matter interaction Meier (); Gavrilenko (). However, the light-matter interaction of a single quantum state is essentially weak because of the localization of its wavefunction. An effective method for overcoming the small reaction cross-section of a single quantum state is utilizing auxiliary systems such as microcavities or optical antennas made with metallic structures, where the extremely localized photonic modes realize a high probability of excitation of the single quantum states by a few photons Kasprzak (); Xiao (); Osaka (). An other solution involves the realization of spatially extended quantum states. A large coherent volume due to the collective dipole motions leads to an enhanced oscillator strength Hanamura (); Takagahara (). In particular, the coherence length of excitonic center-of-mass (CM) motions reaches several hundreds of nano meters in the one-dimensional confined system. This situation yields a large exciton-radiation coupling because the multipole-type excitons with the CM quantum number can match their spatial phase with the radiation waveIshihara (); Syouji (); Ichimiya1 (). In contrast to the optical responses based on the conventional long-wavelength approximation (LWA) of light, this type of interaction exhibits remarkable optical effects such as a large radiative shift leading to the interchange of the quantized levels Syouji () and ultrafast radiative decay Ichimiya1 (). Such exciton–radiation-coupling beyond the LWA strongly modifies the optical spectra relative to those expected from bare excitonic systems, and the interpretation of the spectral shape becomes complex. Although numerous studies have been performed on the excitonic properties in the thin film geometry DelSole2 (); Agarwal (); CK (); CI (); Tredicucci (); Beloussov (); Foy (), efforts to exploit the potential of light-matter coupling beyond the LWA regime have only just begun, and the unresolved physics and potential applications of excitons in promising materials offer scope for further research.

Nanostructures of ZnO have attracted the attention of researchers because of their potential applications in optoelectronic devices operable even at room temperature (RT), such as light-emitting diodes Min (); Li (), ultraviolet photovoltaics Cole (), and exciton polariton lasing Orosz (); Feng () utilizing the wide band gap and large exciton binding energy. Although the formation of an exciton–radiation-coupled system is a key to the exploitation of such applications, even the fundamental structures of the coupled modes were previously unclear. In recent years, however, we revealed that the radiation-induced coupling between A and B excitons in thin film structures enhances the radiative decay rate of particular coupled states Kinoshita (). This result motivates us to exploit coherent nonlinear photo-functions such as ultrafast optical switching at RT because the enhanced decay rates can be expected to exceed the thermal dephasing at RT Ichimiya2 () (typically several tens of or several hundreds of femto-seconds).

Herein, by considering two polarization directions of light, we expand the nonlocal response theory of multicomponent excitons Kinoshita () and investigate the optical Kerr response (OKR), which is known as a typical third-order nonlinear optical effect. Then, we demonstrate that a particular A-B-coupled state in ZnO with an enhanced radiative width of over 50 meV dominantly survives in the OKR signals, even under a massive nonradiative damping meV. The incident pulse width and the film-thickness dependence of the integrated intensity of nonlinear signals clearly show that there is an optimal combination between these two parameters for enhancing the optical nonlinearity. The results indicate the importance of an integrated design of nanostructures and an input optical pulse for maximizing the veiled potential of single quantum states for ultrafast nonlinear optics. The presented demonstrations exhibit a striking contrast to the conventional understandings of excitons, where the coherent nonlinear response is considered to be negligible at RT because the radiative decay rate of excitons never exceeds the thermal dephasing.

The rest of this article is organized as follows: Section II outlines the theory of nonlocal optical response for deriving the radiative decay time of the exciton–radiation-coupled system. Section III demonstrates the optical Kerr spectra considering two kinds of temperature regions: cryogenic temperature (CT) and RT. In Sec. IV, we investigate the pulse width and film thickness dependences of nonlinear signals to determine the optimal pulse width for each film thickness. The results and discussions in this article are summarized in Sec. V.

Ii Radiative decay time

Beyond the LWA regime, the interplay between the spatial structures of the radiation and excitonic wavefunction is activated. Recently, we constructed a theoretical framework for the nonlocal optical response of multicomponent excitons in a thin–film structure with special attention to their self-consistency Kinoshita (). In this section, we review the formalism of the linear response to obtain a full understanding of exciton–radiation coupled modes and the origin of fast radiative decay. As a model system, we considered a thin-film structure with a thickness of along the axis. The thickness is assumed to be far greater than the effective Bohr radius of an exciton; thus, the excitonic relative motion can be treated in the same way as that in the bulk system. In this condition, only the CM motion of excitons is confined in the sample. We neglect the confinement effect of the relative motions of electron–hole pair, which dominantly contributes to the energy structure of excitons in the size region where the thickness reaches the effective Bohr radius Kayanuma () (~1.8 nm for ZnO Klingshirn ()). According to the standard effective-mass approximation, the eigenenergy of the bare exciton is given as , where is an index for labeling multiple exciton bands (thus, corresponds to A or B in the case of ZnO), is the energy of a transverse exciton in the bulk limit, and is the effective mass of an exciton. In a thin sample, the distortion of wavefunctions near the surface generally affects the energy structures of excitons. We therefore applied a microscopic transition layer model DelSole (); Ishihara2 () as the excitonic CM wavefunction . In this model, the quantization condition is given as ( ), where is a decay constant of evanescent waves with a value on the order of the inverse of the effective Bohr radius, indicating the distortion length. In this paper, we fix these values as the effective Bohr radius ( nm) because the optical signal is not sensitive to a change in for a thickness beyond the LWA regime Kinoshita (), although for thin samples in the LWA regime, is one of the important parameters for accurate analysis of the CM quantization as demonstrated in Ref. Yoshimoto ().

According to the linear-response theory Kubo (), the th-order polarization can be obtained from the perturbation expansion method of the density matrix. The first-order polarization in the site representation can be written in nonlocal form as Kinoshita ()

(1)

In this expression, a resonant term of the nonlocal susceptibility is written as

(2)

where is a nonradiative damping constant and . In our definition, has the dimension of a dipole moment per one-half power of volume. This value is obtained from multiple longitudinal-transverse splitting energies Kinoshita ().

should be determined self-consistently with the electromagnetic field in the Maxwell’s equation. Assuming normal incidence for simplicity, the Maxwell electric field in integral form is written as

(3)

where is the background electric field, and is the retarded Green’s function for a thin-film structure Chew (). The eigenmodes of an exciton–radiation-coupled system are obtained from

(4)

where describes the radiative correction from the bare exciton state written as

(5)

which indicates the radiative coupling between the th -band exciton and th -band exciton via radiation. This term also includes the radiation-induced coupling between different band excitons (A and B excitons for ZnO) when .

The real part Re[] gives the eigenenergy including the radiative shift from the bare exciton energy, and the imaginary part Im[] gives the radiative width, where is an index of the quantized exciton–radiation-coupled states. Considering the exponential decay of signals, we defined the radiative decay time as

(6)

Iii Optical Kerr response

First, we investigate the nonlinear optical spectra of A and B excitons in a ZnO thin film, focusing on the OKR. Figure 1 shows a calculation model for the OKR. The polarization angle of the pump light is rotated by to that of the X-polarized probe light. The Y-polarized probe light contains a pure nonlinear component without the background electric field, i.e., . On the other hand, the X-polarized probe light contains both nonlinear and linear components, including the background electric field. To calculate the output OKR signals, we expand the formalism of degenerate four-wave mixing (DFWM) in Ref. Kinoshita () with consideration of two polarization directions of light. In the present demonstration, we focus on the dominant contribution, i.e., the effects of the one-exciton resonance, while avoiding non-essential issues of two-exciton contributions Kinoshita (). Elaborate analysis considering the free two-exciton states through the cancellation effect Ishihara4 () is necessary for evaluating the absolute values of OKR signals, although we do not consider it in the present study.

Figure 1: Calculation model for optical Kerr response

Considering the first- and third-order polarizations, the total electric field of this configuration can be written as

(7)

where is defined as

(8)

In Eq. (7), and are written as

(9)

and

where should be determined self-consistently by solving the third-order Maxwell’s equation. However, if we assume that an electric field originating from the third-order polarization is far weaker than that originated from the linear polarization, this value corresponds well to the solution of the linear response calculation. includes energy denominators of triple-resonance to the input frequencies , , and the observed frequency written as

(11)

where is a nonradiative population decay constant. It should be noted that Eq. (11) has the same form as the case of the DFWM in Eq. (19) in Ref. Kinoshita (). Generally, the OKR and the DFWM are different nonlinear processes; thus, the combination of incident frequencies changes for each process. For example, assuming that the two incident lights are continuous waves with the pump frequency and the probe frequency , the observed OKR frequency is . On the other hand, the observed DFWM frequency is or . Therefore, if we use the combination of and as the observed frequency instead of , the expression for the denominator of the triple-resonance term has a different form for each process. However, by utilizing the same for each process, we find that Eq. (11) is the same as that in the case of the DFWM, although the numerator differs for each process as shown in Eq. (LABEL:U) in this manuscript and Eq. (18) in Ref. Kinoshita (). In addition, the generated nonlinear signal includes every combination of Fourier components in the pump and probe pulses. We integrate over these components by the numerical method.

As conditions of the input lights, we assume Gaussian pulses whose integrated intensity of the pump (probe) light is fixed to 3.0 J/cm (0.3 nJ/cm), and the center energies are both 3.378 eV. Here, we consider two temperature regions CT and RT, and set the corresponding non-radiative damping parameters as and 30 meV. In addition, we used the material parameters of A and B excitons in bulk ZnO Lagois () as listed in Table LABEL:parameters, where is the static electron mass.

         A          B
eV eV
eV eV
meV meV
Table 1: Parameters of bulk ZnO Lagois ()
Figure 2: (a) dependence of calculated optical Kerr spectra normalized by the peak intensity of the input probe pulse (the dotted line indicates spectrum of input 120-fs probe pulse), and (b) eigenmodes of exciton–radiation-coupled system (radiative width vs. eigenenergy) for a film thickness of 291 nm.

Figure 2 shows (a) the dependence of the optical Kerr spectra of a ZnO thin film normalized by the peak intensity of the input probe pulse , and (b) eigenmodes of the exciton–radiation-coupled system (radiative width vs. eigenenergy) for a film thickness of 291 nm. The 120-fs input pulses can cover a certain range of spectral width and partially excite the lower (), middle (), and upper () branches of exciton–radiation-coupled modes at once. The energy and spectral width of the signals obviously reflect the eigenenergy and radiative width. In the case where meV (CT region), the eigenmodes with a radiative width larger than 2 meV dominantly appear; thus, large splitting between the lower and upper peaks is obvious in the spectrum. On the other hand, the eigenmodes with a radiative width smaller than 2 meV are less reflected in the spectrum because of the damping effect. Here, each of the two peaks at the CT should not be attributed solely to the A or B exciton according to their energy position. These two peaks should be assigned to respective mixed modes containing both A and B excitons owing to the radiative coupling Kinoshita ().

With an increase in thermal damping , these two peaks disappear, and only one mode with a very broad spectral width appears (red line). The radiative width of this mode is larger than 50 meV; thus, a large nonlinear signal can survive even at meV (RT region) because the response is faster than the nonradiative damping under this condition.

In the aforementioned discussions, the 120-fs input pulse may not be very effective for maximizing the nonlinear intensity, because it cannot cover the entire radiative width of the fastest mode. Additionally, there are dependences of the input pulse width and the film thickness on the output nonlinear intensities. In the next section, we investigate how the nonlinear intensity can be maximized by changing these parameters.

Iv Nonlinear efficiency

To evaluate the intensity of the OKR signals, we defined the nonlinear efficiency as the ratio of the integrated intensity of the input probe light to that of the output Y-polarized one, as follows:

(12)
Figure 3: Pulse-width dependence of nonlinear efficiency for a film thickness of 291 nm.

Figure 3 shows the pulse-width dependence of the nonlinear efficiency for a film thickness of nm. The value of is maximized when the input pulse effectively covers the peak structures as shown in Fig. 2 (a). In the case where meV (CT region), the upper and lower modes are relatively dominant compared with the fastest decay mode. Therefore, nearly 40-fs pulses are optimal. Pulses that are too short are not effective because of the loss of energy.

On the other hand, in the case where meV (RT region), the fastest decay mode with a radiative width over 50 meV (radiative decay time reaching several femto seconds) dominantly survives in the optical responses. In this situation, a shorter input with a nearly 15-fs pulse width is more effective for covering the very broad radiative width. The nonlinear efficiency is enhanced by a factor of ~10 compared with that of the 120-fs pulse excitation. Significantly, the high damping does not greatly reduce the nonlinear efficiency for nearly 15-fs input pulses, although the damping is 15 times greater than that at CT. This is because the radiative width of the fastest mode is far larger than and less affected by the thermal damping effects.

According to these results, we expect compatibility between fast and strong nonlinear responses caused by short-pulse excitation in the RT region. We demonstrate this by comparing the radiative decay time and the nonlinear efficiency . Figure 4 shows the film-thickness dependences of (a) and (b) with different pulse widths at meV. These figures reveal two particularly noteworthy points. (1) The optimal pulse width depends on the film thickness. This is because the radiative width of the exciton–radiation-coupled mode is determined according to the interaction volume (film thickness) between the exciton and radiation field. Therefore, when the radiative decay time becomes far shorter than the input pulse width with an increase in the film thickness, the nonlinear efficiency decreases. (2) In the case of the 10-fs pulse, similarly to the tendency of the radiative decay times, the nonlinear efficiency increases with the film thickness. In particular, the local minimal values of the radiative decay time and maximal values of the nonlinear efficiency occur around the same thickness, indicating that the fast radiative decay of excitons becomes compatible with the sufficient nonlinear responses if an appropriate film thickness and input pulse width are selected.

Figure 4: Film-thickness dependence of (a) the radiative decay time of exciton–radiation-coupled modes, and (b) the nonlinear efficiency with different pulse widths at meV.

For a thickness region less than 80 nm in length, the nonlinear efficiency is weak. However, around this thickness, where the speed of radiative-decay exceeds that of dephasing, the growth of the nonlinear efficiency becomes rapid even in the case of meV. For ZnO, this occurs in a relatively thin region because particular exciton–radiation-coupled modes exhibit a larger radiative width owing to the radiative coupling of the A and B excitons.

V Conclusion

With the A and B excitons in ZnO, we theoretically investigated the radiative decay times of the exciton–radiation-coupled modes and their nonlinear optical responses by pulse excitation, focusing on the optical Kerr effect. Because of the large radiative coupling of excitons, particular modes exhibit large radiative widths over 50 meV (short radiative decay times reaching several femto seconds), which can exceed the typical thermal damping at RT. This is why such modes survive in coherent nonlinear optical signals such as the OKR in the case of a large damping parameter in the RT region. Then, we demonstrated the pulse-width dependence of the nonlinear efficiency (defined as the ratio of the integrated intensity of the input light to that of the output light), which is expected to increase when the input pulse effectively covers the broad radiative widths of the exciton–radiation-coupled modes. We discovered that the optimal short pulse enhanced the nonlinear efficiency with sufficient values even at RT, compared with those in the CT region. Furthermore, the film-thickness dependence of the radiative decay times and nonlinear efficiency clearly indicate the possibility of compatibility between the fast and strong nonlinear responses obtained by choosing an appropriate film thickness and input pulse width. The presented results draw a contrast to conventional observations of the optical responses of excitons, where a coherent nonlinear response is considered to be never prominent at RT, because the thermal dephasing is far faster than the typical radiative decay of excitons.

The authors thank Professor M. Nakayama, Professor M. Ashida, Professor M. Ichimiya, and Professor N. Yokoshi for their fruitful discussions. This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP16H06504 in Scientific Research on Innovative Areas: “Nano-Material Optical Manipulation.”

References

  • (1) T. Meier, P. Thomas, and S. W. Koch, Coherent Semiconductor Optics: From Basic Concepts to Nanostructure Applications (Springer, 2007).
  • (2) V. I. Gavrilenko, Optics of Nanomaterials (Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2011).
  • (3) J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymaska, R. Andr, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Nature 443, 409 (2006).
  • (4) Y. F. Xiao, Y. C. Liu, B. B. Li, Y. L. Chen, Y. Li, and Q. Gong, Phys. Rev. A 85, 031805 (R) (2012).
  • (5) Y. Osaka, N. Yokoshi, M. Nakatani, and H. Ishihara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 133601 (2014).
  • (6) E. Hanamura, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1228 (1988).
  • (7) T. Takagahara, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16639 (1993).
  • (8) H. Ishihara, K. Cho, K. Akiyama, N. Tomita, Y. Nomura, and T. Isu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 017402 (2002).
  • (9) A. Syouji, B. P. Zhang, Y. Segawa, J. Kishimoto, H. Ishihara, and K. Cho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 257401 (2004).
  • (10) M. Ichimiya, M. Ashida, H. Yasuda, H. Ishihara, and T. Itoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257401 (2009).
  • (11) R. Del Sole, and A. D’Andrea, Excitons in Thin Films, H. Haug, and L. Bnyai, Optical Switching in Low-Dimensional Systems, 194, 289-300 (NATO ASI Series 1989).
  • (12) G. S. Agarwal, D. N. Pattanayak, and E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1022 (1971).
  • (13) K. Cho, and M. Kawata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 4431 (1985).
  • (14) K. Cho, and H. Ishihara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59, 754 (1990).
  • (15) A. Tredicucci, Y. Chen, F. Bassani, J. Massies, C. Deparis, and G. Neu, Phys. Rev. B 47, 10348 (1993).
  • (16) I. V. Beloussov, J. B. Ketterson, and Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. B 81, 205208 (2010).
  • (17) B. Foy, E. McGlynn, A. Cowley, P. J. McNally, and M. O. Henry, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 033505 (2012).
  • (18) M. Chen, M. P. Lu, Y. Wu, J. Song, C. Lee, M. Y. Lu, Y. Chang, L. Chou, Z. Wang, and L. Chen, Nano. Lett. 10 4387 (2010).
  • (19) X. Li, J. Qi, Q. Zhang, Q. Wang, F. Yi, Z. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 221103 (2013).
  • (20) J. J. Cole, X. Wang, R. J. Knuesel, and H. O. Jacobs, Nano. Lett. 8, No. 5 1477 (2008).
  • (21) L. Orosz, F. Rveret, F. Mdard, P. Disseix, J. Leymarie, M. Mihailovic, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, J. Zuniga-Prez, F. Semond, M. Leoux, S. Bouchoule, X. Lafosse, M. Mexis, C. Brimont, and T. Guillet, Phys. Rev. B 85, 121201(R) (2012).
  • (22) F. Li, L. Orosz, O. Kamoun, S. Bouchoule, C. Brimont, P. Disseix, T. Guillet, X. Lafosse, M. Leroux, J. Leymarie, G. Malpuech, M. Mexis, M. Mihailovic, G. Patriarche, F. Rveret, D. Solnyshkov, and J. Zuniga-Perez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 191118 (2013).
  • (23) T. Kinoshita and H. Ishihara, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045441 (2016).
  • (24) M. Ichimiya, K. Mochizuki, M. Ashida, H. Yasuda, H. Ishihara, and T. Itoh, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 248, 456 (2011).
  • (25) Y. Kayanuma, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9797 (1988).
  • (26) C. Klingshirn, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 244, 3027 (2007).
  • (27) A. D’Andrea, and R. Del Sole, Phys.Rev. B 25, 3714 (1982).
  • (28) H. Ishihara and K. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 41, 1424 (1990).
  • (29) H. Ishihara and K. Yoshimoto, Conference Series Number 170 ”Compound Semiconductor 2001”, edited by Y. Arakawa, Y. Hirayama, K. Kishino, H. Yamaguchi (IOP publishing Ltd, 2002), pp467-472.
  • (30) R. Kubo, and K. Tomita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 9, 888 (1954).
  • (31) W. C. Chew: Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media (Wiley-IEEE PRESS, 1995).
  • (32) J. Lagois, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5511 (1981).
  • (33) H. Ishihara, and K. Cho, Phys. Rev. B 42, 1724 (1990).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
131644
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description