Decoherence of dipolar spin ensembles in diamond

Decoherence of dipolar spin ensembles in diamond

Erik Bauch Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA    Swati Singh Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA    Junghyun Lee Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Center for Quantum Information, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea    Connor A. Hart Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA    Jennifer M. Schloss Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA    Matthew J. Turner Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA    John F. Barry Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420, United States    Linh Pham Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420, United States    Nir Bar-Gill The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel    Susanne F. Yelin Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA    Ronald L. Walsworth rwalsworth@cfa.harvard.edu Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
July 1, 2019
Abstract

We present a combined theoretical and experimental study of solid-state spin decoherence in an electronic spin bath, focusing specifically on ensembles of nitrogen vacancy (NV) color centers in diamond and the associated substitutional nitrogen spin bath. We perform measurements of NV spin free induction decay times and spin-echo coherence times in 25 diamond samples with nitrogen concentrations [N] ranging from 0.01 to 300 ppm. We introduce a microscopic model and perform numerical simulations to quantitatively explain the degradation of both and over four orders of magnitude in [N]. Our results resolve a long-standing discrepancy observed in NV experiments, enabling us to describe NV ensemble spin coherence decay shapes as emerging consistently from the contribution of many individual NV.

\heavyrulewidth

=.08em \lightrulewidth=.05em \cmidrulewidth=.03em \belowrulesep=.65ex \belowbottomsep=0pt \aboverulesep=.4ex \abovetopsep=0pt \cmidrulesep=\cmidrulekern=.5em \defaultaddspace=.5em

Solid-state electronic spins have garnered increasing relevance as building blocks in a wide range of quantum science experiments Saeedi2013 (); Hensen2015 (); Sipahigil2016a (). Recently, high-sensitivity quantum sensing experiments have been enabled by the NV spin ensemble system in diamond Wolf2015 (); Barry2016 (); Chatzidrosos2017 (). Such work exploits NV centers’ millisecond-long spin lifetimes under ambient conditions Doherty2013 () and hinges on both the coherent microwave control and the optical initialization and readout of their spin states. In addition to enabling technological advances, these favorable properties make NV centers, and specifically NV ensembles, a leading platform for the study of novel quantum many-body physics and non-equilibrium spin dynamics Choi2017a (); Choi2017 (); Bauch2018 ().

NV ensembles in diamond, like many solid-state spin systems, necessarily suffer from decay of electronic spin coherence (with characteristic times and ) and spin state population (with time ). Dipolar interactions within a complex spin bath environment may limit these relaxation times, bounding the achievable sensitivity of NV-ensemble-based quantum sensing devices and revealing rich many-body dynamics of dipolar-coupled spin systems (see Fig. 1a) Abragam1983 ().

Solid-state spin-based sensing devices utilize host material widely ranging in concentrations of both electronic and nuclear spin species Acosta2009 (); Balasubramanian2009 (); Wolf2015 (); Bauch2018 (), which motivates investigation of dipolar-induced decoherence across varying concentrations of both like and unlike spin species. For example, in NV-rich samples, paramagnetic substitutional nitrogen impurities (P1 centers, Smith1959 (); Cook1966 (); Loubser1978 () typically persist at concentrations similar to or exceeding the NV concentration, setting the NV spin relaxation time scales. In other dense spin-ensemble systems, spin relaxation has been observed to be dominated by like-spin interactions VanWyk1997 (); Tyryshkin2012 (); Choi2017a (). Understanding the degree and character of decoherence informs engineering of material and design of spin interrogation schemes for high-performance quantum devices.

Figure 1: a) Schematic of bath interaction in NV diamond showing NV as central spin, substitutional nitrogen (P1 center, ) and C nuclear () bath spins. Central-spin-bath coupling strength and intra-bath coupling strength are shown (see text for more information). b) NV crystallographic defect and electronic spin-triplet ground-state level structure. c) Free induction decay (Ramsey) and spin echo pulse sequence are used to measure and , respectively. d) Representative spin echo decay fringes (blue) and envelope (red) for [N] = 80 and 6 ppm diamond samples. The modulation of the echo signal visible in C samples is caused by Larmor precession of the C nuclear spins (see main text and Suppl. S2). e) Magnetic field dependence of for select set of samples.

In this Letter, we experimentally and theoretically investigate the NV ensemble electronic spin dephasing time and spin echo coherence time in diamond samples with nitrogen density spanning more than four orders of magnitude. We purposefully choose diamond samples with grown-in spin concentrations to limit the study to NV decoherence resulting from paramagnetic nitrogen bath spins. In this regime, we identify characteristic inverse-linear scalings for both NV and with nitrogen density . We also find NV ensemble spin coherence decay shapes that can be consistently described as the result of ensemble averaging. Our work extends the comprehensive knowledge acquired for single NVs Balasubramanian2009 (); Mizuochi2009 (); DeLange2010 (); DeLange2012 () to NV ensembles, and thus is critical for the development of ensemble-based quantum applications.

Experimental Results – Our study comprises of 20 natural abundance diamond samples (, “C-samples”) and 5 isotopically enriched samples (, “C-samples”) with total nitrogen concentrations in the range [N] = 10 ppb - 300 ppm. Free induction decay (FID) NV and spin echo measurements are performed (see Fig. 1c) using confocal or wide field microscopy. In both experimental setups, 532 nm laser light is applied to optically initialize and readout the NV spin polarization. In addition, we apply a static magnetic field along one of the [111] crystal directions (misalignment angle ), which singles out one of the four possible NV orientations and lifts the degeneracy of the NV spin-1 ground state (see Fig. 1b). Pulsed microwaves resonant with the or spin transition are deployed to coherently manipulate the NV spin state.

In Fig. 1d we depict two spin echo curves from diamonds with [N] = 80 and 6 ppm, which are representative of the set of 20 C diamond samples studied in this work. The data exhibit coherent modulation of the NV spin echo signal due to Larmor precession of nuclear bath spins (see Suppl. S2Rowan1965 (); Childress2006 (); Stanwix2010 (). Isotopically enriched C-samples did not exhibit any modulation of the coherence signal irrespective of the applied magnetic field strength. The focus of this work is the overall exponential-type decay, which is associated with loss of NV ensemble electronic spin coherence due to dipolar interactions with electronic nitrogen bath spins DeLange2010 (). For all samples, the decay envelope was subsequently fitted to the form (red solid lines in Fig. 1d) to extract and the stretched exponential parameter  DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 ().

Figure 1e shows times derived from this analysis for a select set of C and C samples as a function of magnetic bias field strengths. Only small variations in () are observable for the range of bias field strengths (mT, see Suppl. S2) indicating that is largely independent of magnetic field. Next, we summarize in Fig. 2a values for all samples as a function of total nitrogen concentration with two regimes discernible. At nitrogen concentrations ppm, exhibits an inverse-linear dependence on the nitrogen concentration, suggesting that interactions with nitrogen bath spins are the dominant source of decoherence of NV ensemble electronic spin. This inverse-linear scaling is consistent with studies in comparable crystalline systems and characteristic of dipolar-coupled spin environments VanWyk1997 (); Mizuochi2009 (); Abe2010 (); Stepanov2016 (). In such instances, is proportional to the spin bath density , i.e., , where the factor depends on microscopic details of the system-bath coupling and the spin bath dynamics (see below).

For samples with concentrations  ppm, however, saturates at s, for both isotopically purified and natural abundance samples. This bound is well below the observed limit set by NV electronic spin lattice relaxation, where previous work found that ms Bar-Gill2013 (). While a detailed investigation of the measured bound is beyond the scope of this manuscript, additional decoherence mechanisms may include the C nuclear spin bath (for C samples) Mizuochi2009 (); Hall2014 (), spurious external AC magnetic fields, and other spin defects in the diamond host.

Figure 2: NV ensemble coherence a) NV ensemble spin echo as a function of [N] with orthogonal-distance regression fit to Eqn. 1 (black dashed line) and range of values extracted from numerical simulation (gray band). Uncertainties are confidence intervals. Inset: Stretched exponential parameters extracted from measurements. The average value is indicated as black dotted line. b) Similarly, NV ensemble as a function of nitrogen concentration [N].

To further quantify the observed scaling, we fit the extracted values to the form

(1)

where is the nitrogen-dominated NV decoherence rate per unit density and accounts for decoherence mechanisms independent of nitrogen (including spin-lattice relaxation Bar-Gill2013 ()). From the fit (black dashed line in Fig. 2a) we extract kHz/ppm sppm) and s. We also fit this model to the natural abundance C (blue dots) and C (red squares) sample data alone, and find agreement within error margins among the three sets of diamond samples (see Suppl. S2). Additionally, we plot the extracted stretched exponential parameter in the inset of Fig. 2a. All samples exhibit exponential-type decay with a sample average value . This non-integer spin-echo decay is in striking contrast to the cubic decay () observed for single NV centers in a bath of nitrogen spins DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 () (see discussion below).

Similarly, FID Ramsey measurements were employed to determine the NV ensemble electronic spin dephasing time . A recent related study Bauch2018 () demonstrated that several dephasing mechanisms typically limit s in NV ensemble samples. Sources of ensemble dephasing include interactions with nuclear C bath spins Mizuochi2009 (); Dreau2012 (); Bauch2018 (), crystal-lattice strain fields over the diamond Jamonneau2015 (); Bauch2018 (), and measurement-related artifacts such as magnetic field gradients over the collection volume and temperature fluctuations Acosta2010 (); Bauch2018 (). Great care was therefore taken to isolate the nitrogen-specific contribution to from other contributions. In particular, we limit our set of FID measurements to C samples in the  ppm range for which C-related dephasing can be neglected Bauch2018 (). Moreover, we sense dephasing in the NV double quantum basis  Fang2013 (); Mamin2014 (); Bauch2018 () to mitigate contributions from strain field gradients and temperature fluctuations of the diamond sample. We correct for the twice higher dephasing rate in the double quantum basis; further details are provided in Suppl. S2 and Ref. Bauch2018 ().)

NV ensemble electronic spin dephasing times and stretched exponential parameters were extracted from the FID data via a fit of the decay envelopes to the form . Figure 2b shows the measured and values as a function of [N] for the subset of samples. Similarly to (Fig. 2a), we find to scale inverse-linear with nitrogen concentration in the explored regime. We consequently fit the data to the form (compare to Eqn. 1), where is the nitrogen-related NV ensemble dephasing rate per unit density. From the fit we extract kHzppm sppm). In addition, all FID NV ensemble measurements exhibit simple exponential decay (, see Fig. 2b inset), which deviates from the quadratic decay observed for single NV measurements DeLange2010 (); DeLange2012 (), and is in agreement with earlier theoretical work Dobrovitski2009 ().

Theoretical Model – To support the assumption that the measured scaling for and are indeed due to nitrogen bath spins, we developed an analytic model and performed numerical simulations of the bath dynamics. We started with a phenomenological model for incoherent spin bath dynamics that leads to dephasing and decoherence of NV center electronic spins. Under the secular approximation, the dipolar interaction between two spins and can be simplified to Abragam1983 ()

(2)

Transforming the dipole-dipole interaction to a frame along the [111] crystal axis, the two coefficients are

(3)
(4)

Here, is the distance, and is the polar angle between the applied bias magnetic field and the intra-spin axis (i.e., a vector connecting the two spins). For the case of dipolar interactions between NV and a P1 bath spin, the large NV zero field splitting makes spin flip-flop transitions non-energy-conserving and the second term in Eqn. 2 is strongly suppressed. The system-bath interaction thus simplifies to and the spin bath may be treated as an effective B-field whose value depends on the state of the bath spins. At room temperature, all spin states are equally occupied, and we can define the system-bath interaction strength , to characterize the effective B-field due to dipolar coupling between the NV sensor spin and N-bath spins. quantifies the broadening of the NV sensor electron spin resonance and dephasing rate of the NV qubit.

We now extent our model to evaluate the rate of P1 spin bath dynamics. In the presence of an external B-field, the flip-flop interaction between two P1 spins in Eqn. 2 can be mapped to a pseudo-spin- system, with Hamiltonian , where is the difference in the local field (including Overhauser) experienced by the two bath spins and . As shown in Fig. 3, the pseudo-spin states correspond to and states of the P1 spin pair. In numerically evaluating for simulations, we took into account the P1 nuclear spin state (), the P1 Jahn-Teller axis (along any of the four [111] diamond crystal axes) Ammerlaan1981 (), and nearby P1 centers. Along with the coherent Hamiltonian evolution, there is a stochastic change in due to changes in the local spin environment caused by (among other things) flip-flop dynamics of far away bath spins. Including this incoherent part, the evolution of the density matrix is given by , where the Louvillian includes dephasing at rate . Here denotes the rate of change of the effective B-field to which the pseudospin is subjected.

Figure 3: Phenomenological model to evaluate bath correlation time . (a) The bath spin dynamics arise due to interaction between nearby P1 spins. (b) Out of the four configurations, states and give spin bath dynamics under Hamiltonian in Eqn. 2. (c) These dynamics can be mapped to a spin 1/2 system. The slow dynamics of the remaining spin bath is taken into account as a dephasing term in the master equation.

We solve for the rate of change of population () to obtain

(5)

Assuming all P1 spin pairs act independently, we add the different rates in order to get an overall rate of spin bath dynamics . Realistically, each spin pair has a different and . Nonetheless, while we evaluated for each P1 spin numerically, we assumed all pairs have the same dephasing rate , where is the number of bath spins and is the average dipolar interaction. Note that is the intrinsic linewidth of the dipolar spin bath Stamps2000 (). We define to characterize the spin bath correlation time DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 (). The many-body dynamics of the spin bath leads to decoherence of the NV center.

While the origin of and are quantum in nature, in order to estimate the electronic spin coherence properties of NV ensembles, we can model the P1 bath dynamics as an effective random B-field with root-mean-square strength and correlation time  DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 (). This approximation works well due to the low density of impurity spins and slow bath dynamics, allowing us to ignore higher order quantum effects. In our analytic model for the NV spin coherence signal, the effect of the nitrogen bath is modeled as an Orenstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic process Klauder1962 (); DeSousa2009 (); Witzel2014 (). While the details of the derivation are provided in the Suppl., here we present the main results.

For a single NV initially polarized in the state and undergoing the (or ) transition, the probability to be measured in state after time is given by and  DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 () (see Suppl. S3) for FID and spin echo experiments, respectively. Here, and , where (as discussed previously) characterizes the system-bath coupling strength and characterizes the spin bath correlation time. In order to evaluate NV ensemble averaged probabilities, we need to integrate and over the distribution of and in the ensemble.

Figure 4: Simulated distribution of coupling strength (a) and bath correlation time (b) for ppm extracted from spin bath configurations. From a fit of each distributions (red line) to the analytic PDF P() and P() given in the main text, respectively, the relevant ensemble parameters and are extracted, and and calculated. Similar distributions are obtained for , and 1000 ppm.

Figure 4 shows the distribution of and generated from simulating bath configurations for ppm. For dipolar electronic spin interactions, the probability density function (PDF) for has the form  Dobrovitski2008 (), where is the average electronic spin-spin coupling strength within the NV ensemble. Integrating over the distribution of , we arrive at the ensemble averaged probability,

(6)

where . The ensemble-averaged NV FID signal thus exhibits simple exponential decay () in agreement with our experimental results (see Fig. 2b inset).

A similar analysis can be done to evaluate the NV ensemble . In this case, we also need to account for the distribution of . In our classical treatment, can be interpreted as a first passage time for a stochastic process (here several bath spin flip-flops) with PDF  Grimmett2001 (). Here, and are the shape parameter and the ensemble mean of the distribution, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4, the above PDFs model the numerical distribution of and obtained from simulating the dipolar-coupled system. Finally, we integrate over the PDFs of and and obtain

(7)

where (), and the ensemble-averaged spin echo decay exhibits non-integer decay with . This analytic treatment agrees with the experimentally measured form of the NV ensemble spin echo decay envelopes (see Fig. 2a inset). Furthermore, using the bath simulation results for and from our phenomenological model in Eqns. 6 and 7, we find good agreement with experiments for and reasonable agreement for , as shown in Fig. 2. The consensus among analytic results, experiment and numerical simulation leads us to conclude that the Orenstein-Uhlenbeck model adequately describes the decoherence of an ensemble of NV electronic spins induced by nitrogen bath spins, with and as the experimentally determined dephasing and decoherence rates (per unit density) due to nitrogen bath spins. These results are consistent with earlier theoretical predictions that similar electronic spin baths can be modeled classically Witzel2014 (). We emphasize that the role of the C bath is negligible if nitrogen is the dominant source of NV ensemble electronic spin decoherence.

Taking the ratio , which is independent of absolute nitrogen concentration, we find that exceeds by across a wide range of diamond samples and [N]. Given the provided scalings, rough calibration of bulk substitutional nitrogen spin concentrations through NV coherence measurements can thus be performed.

Finally, we comment on the parameter in single and ensemble NV experiments. For single NVs, the exponential-type decay shapes for FID, spin echo, and spin lifetime measurements are determined by spin-resonance experiments in nitrogen-rich diamonds, showing good agreement with theory (see Tab. 1, columns 2 and 3).

Experiment single NV NV ensemble
exp./theo. exp./theo.
3  DeLange2010 ()/DeSousa2009 () this work
2  DeLange2010 () /DeSousa2009 () 1  Bauch2018 ()Dobrovitski2009 (), this work
(cross-relax.) - - 1/2  Jarmola2015 (); Choi2017a ()Hall2016 (); Choi2017a ()
(spin-lattice relax.) 1 Rosskopf2014InvestigationDiamond () 1  Redman1991 (); Jarmola2012 ()
Table 1: Stretched exponential parameter for single NV and NV ensemble measurements.

However, as has been observed in several experiments, different power laws emerge for the decay signal of individual NV centers with slightly varying spin environments. For example, several studies independently reported a square-root decay shape () for NV spin relaxation in high-NV density samples Jarmola2015 (); Hall2016 (); Choi2017a (). In these samples, the NV is limited by cross-relaxation within the strongly interacting bath of NV spins rather than spin-lattice relaxation (i.e., phononic decay), which exhibits a simple exponential decay envelope Redman1991 (); Takahashi2008 (); Jarmola2012 (). This situation is comparable the present experiment, for which the measured NV ensemble and are the sum of many individual decays, with decay rates limited by dipolar interactions with an inhomogenous nitrogen spin bath. We stress that the form of the stretched exponential from such NV ensembles results from the averaging of NV and spin bath distributions, which in turn depends on the microscopic quantum interactions that lead to decay. Unlike , the NV ensemble depends on the many-body dynamics of the spin bath. Mean field models like the one used here are insufficient to accurately capture the dynamics of such highly disordered quantum systems. While our model describes the relevant scalings and NV coherence decay shapes, the underestimation of , particularly for larger NV and nitrogen concentration, may indicate localization-type behavior. Thus future work should include theoretical and experimental investigation of localized phases in this system.

In conclusion, we studied electronic spin dephasing and decoherence of NV ensembles in diamond as a function of nitrogen concentration and extracted the scalings for and . We found that the dominant nitrogen electronic spin bath dynamics are well described by an Orenstein-Uhlenbeck process, with reasonable agreement between experimental measurements and numerical simulations. We also analyzed the NV ensemble spin coherence decay shape for FID and spin echo measurements, and found them well explained by a statistical average over the contribution of many individual NV signals, in analogy to the decay shapes observed in NV ensemble experiments.

We acknowledge fruitful discussion with Joonhee Choi and Soonwon Choi. We thank EAG Laboratories for the SIMS measurements of nitrogen concentration. This material is based upon work supported by, or in part by, the United States Army Research Laboratory and the United States Army Research Office under Grant No. W911NF1510548; the National Science Foundation Electronics, Photonics and Magnetic Devices (EPMD), Physics of Living Systems (PoLS), and Integrated NSF Support Promoting Interdisciplinary Research and Education (INSPIRE) programs under Grants No. ECCS-1408075, PHY-1504610, and EAR-1647504, respectively; and Lockheed Martin under award A32198. This work was performed in part at the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure Network (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF award no. 1541959. J. M. S. was supported by a Fannie and John Hertz Foundation Graduate Fellowship and a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant 1122374.

Supplemental Materials: Decoherence of dipolar spin ensembles in diamond

S1 Sample Characterization

All diamond crystals were manufactured by Element Six and Apollo Diamond 111now Scio Diamond Technology Corporation. Samples with nitrogen spin densities [N]ppm were grown using chemical vapor deposition (CVD, for a review, see Schwander2011 ()) and consist of bulk diamond plates, as well as thin (m) nitrogen-doped layers grown on top of Ib or IIa diamond substrates. Two other samples were grown using the high-pressure-high-temperature (HPHT) method Bundy1955 (); Sumiya1996 (); Kanda2000 (); Hartland2014 (); Zaitsev2001 () and cover the range ppm. Due to the low abundance of NV center spins in all samples (), contributions from NV-NV dipolar interactions are negligible for the experiments in this manuscript.

The total nitrogen concentration within diamond samples studied in this work is determined by several methods: For the majority of samples, the manufacturers provided estimated nitrogen spin concentrations or secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) data taken on samples from the same growth run. In addition, for a subset of samples SIMS measurement were performed by EAG Laboratories. In select samples, nitrogen was determined through fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Taylor1990 (); Hartland2014 ().

The reported uncertainties in [N] are calculated from the mean and variation in spin concentration values provided by combining results from various methods. If only one method was available, the uncertainty is given by the method’s reported error margin. For SIMS measurements an error of is conservatively assumed, which also accounts for variations in N throughout different parts of a sample.

S2 Measurement Details

Spin Echo – Low nitrogen density C samples exhibited periodic modulation of the NV spin echo signal (ESEEM, Ref. Rowan1965 (); Childress2006 ()) owing to the Larmor precession of the C nuclear spin bath, as shown in Fig. 1d (ppm sample). Revival and collapses of the spin echo signal occurred with frequency , where MHz/T Childress2006 (); Stanwix2010 () is the C nuclear gyromagnetic ratio and is the bias magnetic field. To clearly separate the overall decay envelope from the Larmor signal, for each natural abundance C sample the bias field was adjusted between mT to tune the Larmor precession frequency such that (low nitrogen samples) or (high nitrogen samples). The isotopically enriched C samples did not exhibit modulation of the coherence signal independent of the applied magnetic field strength. As discussed in the main text and Fig. 1e, only small variations in NV are observed with changing , which suggests that is largely independent of bias magnetic field for the range of fields.

We also fit Eqn. 1 to the C and C sample NV data alone (see Fig. 2a) and obtained {kHz/ppm, s} and {kHz/ppm, s}, respectively. The close agreement (within error margins) among values extracted for C, C, and the combined data suggests that NV spin ensemble decoherence due to C nuclear spins in natural abundance samples on is negligible, when nitrogen is the dominant source of decoherence.

Ramsey – Several inhomogeneous broadening mechanisms contribute to NV ensemble spin dephasing. For example, the -limit in natural abundance samples set by C spins (Bauch2018 ()) restricts our measurements to isotopically enriched C samples. In addition, FID decay was probed in the NV center’s double quantum basis () to mitigate effects of strain fields and temperature fluctuations. To account for the twice higher gyromagnetic ratio and doubled dephasing rate in the double quantum basis, the extracted values are multiplied by 2. Lastly, measurements where performed at low magnetic bias fields (G) to reduce the influence of magnetic field gradients. Further experimental details are given in Ref. Bauch2018 ().

S3 Classical treatment of the spin bath dynamics

In this section, we discuss the evolution of several standard pulse sequences on an NV electronic spin in the presence of a fluctuating B-field. We also perform ensemble averages over a distribution of NV centers in order to evaluate the form of experimentally measured signals.

For an NV center undergoing dynamical decoupling pulse sequences under the presence of a fluctuating B-field, the probability to find the NV electronic spin in state after time is given by

(8)

Here, the total phase difference accumulated is

(9)

where are step-like functions describing the periodic inversion of the NV spin for the pulse sequence under consideration Cywinski2008 (); DeSousa2009 (), and includes the random magnetic fields due to the spin bath surrounding the NV center.

Considering we have a large number of impurity spins with different couplings to the NV center, we assume that the random fluctuating B-field due to the spin bath has a Gaussian distribution (with zero mean), simply due to the Central Limit Theorem DeLange2010 (). Invoking properties of Gaussian noise, Eqn. 8 simplifies to

(10)

where

(11)

Following the convention established by Ref. Cywinski2008 () and others,

(12)

is the classical B-field spectral noise density and

(13)

the filter function of the pulse sequence under consideration. The properties of the random B-field imposed here make it equivalent to treating it as an Orenstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic process Klauder1962 (); DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 (); Witzel2014 ().

We now look into the microscopic origin of the fluctuating B-field. For a bath spin Larmor precessing at , the effective B-field at the central spin is given by . Assuming the coherent spin precession decays at a timescale characterized by the bath correlation time , the B-field at the central spin can be approximated by . Thus the bath spectral density becomes

(14)

In the short time (high frequency) limit, the bath spectral density function can be simplified to

(15)

For brevity and consistency with the main text, we define . For an NV free induction decay (FID) measurement, the filter function is given by  Cywinski2008 (), leading to

(16)

For a spin echo measurement, the filter function is given by  Cywinski2008 (), giving us

(17)

For short times, i.e. (but ), for the two measurements simplifies to

(18)

Substituting this in Eqn. 10, we get

(19)
(20)

where

(21)
(22)

Here, we have replaced with to be consistent with the main text. Finally, comparing this with the phenomenological quantum model of the spin bath dynamics developed in this work, we get

(23)
(24)

The time dependencies for various dynamical decoupling protocols become different if we average this signal over several NV centers, each evolving under a random spin bath distribution, as in experiments. For dipolar interactions, the probability density function (PDF) for has the form Dobrovitski2008 (),

(25)

Here, is the average coupling strength of the NV to the spin bath within the NV ensemble. Integrating over the distribution of , we arrive at the ensemble averaged probability,

(26)

where . The ensemble averaged FID signal thus exhibits simple exponential decay () in agreement with our experimental results (see Fig. 2b inset).

We now perform a similar analysis to get an expression for the ensemble-averaged NV decoherence time . In this case, we need to take into account the nitrogen electronic spin bath dynamics. We classically model the bath correlation time as the time taken for a stochastic process (here several bath bath spin flip-flops) to reach a certain threshold, thus can be seen as the equivalent of first passage time. The probability distribution function (PDF) of here is assumed to be a simplified Gaussian PDF given by

(27)

Here, is an overall fitting parameter, and is the ensemble mean of the distribution. As shown in Fig. 4, the above PDFs model the numerical distribution of and obtained from the quantum model. Finally, integrating over the distributions of and , we get for the spin echo signal

(28)

where , and the ensemble-averaged decay exhibits non-integer decay with .

S4 Numerical Simulations

In order to simulate a random mixed electronic spin bath and its dynamics, we start with a diamond lattice putting an NV at origin, and pick random lattice sites for nitrogen P1 centers with the right concentration. Current simulations include  ppm of nitrogen spins. We evaluate the dipole-dipole interaction between the NV and P1 spins to obtain given by Eqn. 23. To obtain , we sum all the P1 spin pair interactions according to Eqn. 24. Finally, we extract the ensemble averaged values and from the distribution generated from bath realizations (see Fig. 4 in main text for ppm). When numerically estimating , we ignore spin bath pairs that interact weakly with the NV, leading to motional narrowing, as discussed in literature DeSousa2009 (); DeLange2010 ().

References

  • [1] K. Saeedi, S. Simmons, J. Z. Salvail, P. Dluhy, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, J. J. L. Morton, and M. L. W. Thewalt. Room-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 Minutes Using Ionized Donors in Silicon-28. Science, 342(6160):830–833, 2013.
  • [2] B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature, 526(7575):682–686, 10 2015.
  • [3] A. Sipahigil, R. E. Evans, D. D. Sukachev, M. J. Burek, J. Borregaard, M. K. Bhaskar, C. T. Nguyen, J. L. Pacheco, H. A. Atikian, C. Meuwly, R. M. Camacho, F. Jelezko, E. Bielejec, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin. An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks. Science, 354(6314):847–850, 2016.
  • [4] Thomas Wolf, Philipp Neumann, Kazuo Nakamura, Hitoshi Sumiya, Takeshi Ohshima, Junichi Isoya, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Subpicotesla Diamond Magnetometry. Physical Review X, 5(4):041001, 10 2015.
  • [5] John F. Barry, Matthew J. Turner, Jennifer M. Schloss, David R. Glenn, Yuyu Song, Mikhail D. Lukin, Hongkun Park, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(49):14133–14138, 12 2016.
  • [6] Georgios Chatzidrosos, Arne Wickenbrock, Lykourgos Bougas, Nathan Leefer, Teng Wu, Kasper Jensen, Yannick Dumeige, and Dmitry Budker. Miniature Cavity-Enhanced Diamond Magnetometer. Physical Review Applied, 8(4):044019, 10 2017.
  • [7] Marcus W. Doherty, Neil B. Manson, Paul Delaney, Fedor Jelezko, Jörg Wrachtrup, and Lloyd C L Hollenberg. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Physics Reports, 528(1):1–45, 2013.
  • [8] Joonhee Choi, Soonwon Choi, Georg Kucsko, Peter C Maurer, Brendan J Shields, Hitoshi Sumiya, Shinobu Onoda, Junichi Isoya, Eugene Demler, Fedor Jelezko, Norman Y Yao, and Mikhail D Lukin. Depolarization Dynamics in a Strongly Interacting Solid-State Spin Ensemble. Physical Review Letters, 118(9):093601, 3 2017.
  • [9] Soonwon Choi, Joonhee Choi, Renate Landig, Georg Kucsko, Hengyun Zhou, Junichi Isoya, Fedor Jelezko, Shinobu Onoda, Hitoshi Sumiya, Vedika Khemani, Curt von Keyserlingk, Norman Y. Yao, Eugene Demler, and Mikhail D. Lukin. Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system. Nature, 543(7644):221–225, 3 2017.
  • [10] Erik Bauch, Connor A. Hart, Jennifer M. Schloss, Matthew J. Turner, John F. Barry, Pauli Kehayias, Swati Singh, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Ultralong Dephasing Times in Solid-State Spin Ensembles via Quantum Control. Physical Review X, 8(3):31025, 2018.
  • [11] A. Abragam. The principles of nuclear magnetism. Clarendon Press, 1983.
  • [12] V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, C. Santori, K. M C Fu, P. E. Barclay, R. G. Beausoleil, H. Linget, J. F. Roch, F. Treussart, S. Chemerisov, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker. Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen-vacancy centers for magnetometry applications. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 80(11):1–15, 2009.
  • [13] Gopalakrishnan Balasubramanian, Philipp Neumann, Daniel Twitchen, Matthew Markham, Roman Kolesov, Norikazu Mizuochi, Junichi Isoya, Jocelyn Achard, Johannes Beck, Julia Tissler, Vincent Jacques, Philip R Hemmer, Fedor Jelezko, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nature Materials, 8(5):383–387, 5 2009.
  • [14] W. V. Smith, P. P. Sorokin, I. L. Gelles, and G. J. Lasher. Electron-spin resonance of nitrogen donors in diamond. Physical Review, 115(6):1546–1552, 1959.
  • [15] R. J. Cook and D. H. Whiffen. Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Study of a Nitrogen Centre in Diamond. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 295(1441):99–106, 11 1966.
  • [16] J H N Loubser and J A van Wyk. Electron spin resonance in the study of diamond. Reports on Progress in Physics, 41(8):1201–1248, 8 1978.
  • [17] J A Van Wyk, E C Reynhardt, G L High, and I Kiflawi. The dependences of ESR line widths and spin - spin relaxation times of single nitrogen defects on the concentration of nitrogen defects in diamond. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 30(12):1790–1793, 1997.
  • [18] Alexei M Tyryshkin, Shinichi Tojo, John J L Morton, Helge Riemann, Nikolai V Abrosimov, Peter Becker, Hans-Joachim Pohl, Thomas Schenkel, Michael L W Thewalt, Kohei M Itoh, and S a Lyon. Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon. Nature Materials, 11(2):143–147, 2 2012.
  • [19] N Mizuochi, P Neumann, F Rempp, J Beck, V Jacques, P Siyushev, K Nakamura, D J Twitchen, H Watanabe, S Yamasaki, F Jelezko, and J Wrachtrup. Coherence of single spins coupled to a nuclear spin bath of varying density. Physical Review B, 80(4):041201, 7 2009.
  • [20] G de Lange, Z H Wang, D. Riste, V V Dobrovitski, and R Hanson. Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid-State Spin from a Spin Bath. Science, 330(6000):60–63, 10 2010.
  • [21] Gijs de Lange, Toeno van der Sar, Machiel Blok, Zhi-Hui Wang, Viatcheslav Dobrovitski, and Ronald Hanson. Controlling the quantum dynamics of a mesoscopic spin bath in diamond. Scientific Reports, 2(1):382, 12 2012.
  • [22] L. Rowan, E. Hahn, and W. Mims. Electron-Spin-Echo Envelope Modulation. Physical Review, 137(1A):A61–A71, 1965.
  • [23] L Childress, M V Gurudev Dutt, J M Taylor, A S Zibrov, F Jelezko, J Wrachtrup, P R Hemmer, and M D Lukin. Coherent Dynamics of Coupled Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond. Science, 314(5797):281–285, 10 2006.
  • [24] P. L. Stanwix, L. M. Pham, J. R. Maze, D. Le Sage, T. K. Yeung, P. Cappellaro, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth. Coherence of nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin ensembles in diamond. Physical Review B, 82(20):201201, 11 2010.
  • [25] Rogerio de Sousa. Electron Spin Resonance and Related Phenomena in Low-Dimensional Structures, volume 115 of Topics in Applied Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.
  • [26] Eisuke Abe, Alexei M. Tyryshkin, Shinichi Tojo, John J.L. Morton, Wayne M. Witzel, Akira Fujimoto, Joel W. Ager, Eugene E. Haller, Junichi Isoya, Stephen A. Lyon, Mike L.W. Thewalt, and Kohei M. Itoh. Electron spin coherence of phosphorus donors in silicon: Effect of environmental nuclei. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 82(12):121201, 9 2010.
  • [27] Viktor Stepanov and Susumu Takahashi. Determination of nitrogen spin concentration in diamond using double electron-electron resonance. Physical Review B, 94(2):024421, 7 2016.
  • [28] N Bar-Gill, L.M. Pham, A Jarmola, D Budker, and R.L. Walsworth. Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second. Nature Communications, 4(1):1743, 12 2013.
  • [29] L. T. Hall, J. H. Cole, and L. C. L. Hollenberg. Analytic solutions to the central-spin problem for nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Physical Review B, 90(7):075201, 8 2014.
  • [30] A. Dréau, J.-R. Maze, M. Lesik, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques. High-resolution spectroscopy of single NV defects coupled with nearby 13C nuclear spins in diamond. Physical Review B, 85(13):134107, 4 2012.
  • [31] P. Jamonneau, M. Lesik, J. P. Tetienne, I. Alvizu, L. Mayer, A. Dréau, S. Kosen, J.-F. Roch, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, T. Teraji, Y. Kubo, P. Bertet, J. R. Maze, and V. Jacques. Competition between electric field and magnetic field noise in the decoherence of a single spin in diamond. Physical Review B, 93(2):024305, 1 2016.
  • [32] V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.-S. Bouchard, and D. Budker. Temperature Dependence of the Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetic Resonance in Diamond. Physical Review Letters, 104(7):070801, 2 2010.
  • [33] Kejie Fang, Victor M. Acosta, Charles Santori, Zhihong Huang, Kohei M. Itoh, Hideyuki Watanabe, Shinichi Shikata, and Raymond G. Beausoleil. High-Sensitivity Magnetometry Based on Quantum Beats in Diamond Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Physical Review Letters, 110(13):130802, 3 2013.
  • [34] H. J. Mamin, M. H. Sherwood, M. Kim, C. T. Rettner, K. Ohno, D. D. Awschalom, and D. Rugar. Multipulse Double-Quantum Magnetometry with Near-Surface Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Physical Review Letters, 113(3):030803, 7 2014.
  • [35] V. V. Dobrovitski, A. E. Feiguin, R. Hanson, and D. D. Awschalom. Decay of Rabi Oscillations by Dipolar-Coupled Dynamical Spin Environments. Physical Review Letters, 102(23):237601, 6 2009.
  • [36] C A J Ammerlaan and E. A. Burgemeister. Reorientation of Nitrogen in Type-Ib Diamond by Thermal Excitation and Tunneling. Physical Review Letters, 47(13):954–957, 9 1981.
  • [37] R L Stamps. TOPICAL REVIEW- Mechanisms for exchange bias. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 33:247, 2000.
  • [38] Jr Klauder and Pw Anderson. Spectral Diffusion Decay in Spin Resonance Experiments. Physical Review, 125(3):912–932, 1962.
  • [39] Wayne M. Witzel, Kevin Young, and Sankar Das Sarma. Converting a real quantum spin bath to an effective classical noise acting on a central spin. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 90(11):1–6, 2014.
  • [40] V. V. Dobrovitski, A. E. Feiguin, D. D. Awschalom, and R. Hanson. Decoherence dynamics of a single spin versus spin ensemble. Physical Review B, 77(24):245212, 6 2008.
  • [41] Geoffrey Grimmett. Probability and random processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, 2001.
  • [42] A Jarmola, A Berzins, J. Smits, K Smits, J Prikulis, F Gahbauer, R Ferber, D Erts, M Auzinsh, and D. Budker. Longitudinal spin-relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy centers in electron irradiated diamond. Applied Physics Letters, 107(24):242403, 12 2015.
  • [43] L. T. Hall, P. Kehayias, D. A. Simpson, A. Jarmola, A. Stacey, D. Budker, and L. C. L. Hollenberg. Detection of nanoscale electron spin resonance spectra demonstrated using nitrogen-vacancy centre probes in diamond. Nature Communications, 7:10211, 2016.
  • [44] T. Rosskopf, A. Dussaux, K. Ohashi, M. Loretz, R. Schirhagl, H. Watanabe, S. Shikata, K. M. Itoh, and C. L. Degen. Investigation of surface magnetic noise by shallow spins in diamond. Physical Review Letters, 112(14):1–5, 2014.
  • [45] D a Redman, S Brown, R H Sands, and S C Rand. Spin dynamics and electronic states of N-V center in diamond by EPR and Four-Wave_Mixing spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters, 64(24):3420–3423, 1991.
  • [46] A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker. Temperature- and magnetic-field-dependent longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond. Physical Review Letters, 108(19):1–5, 2012.
  • [47] Susumu Takahashi, Ronald Hanson, Johan van Tol, Mark S. Sherwin, and David D. Awschalom. Quenching Spin Decoherence in Diamond through Spin Bath Polarization. Physical Review Letters, 101(4):047601, 7 2008.
  • [48] now Scio Diamond Technology Corporation.
  • [49] Michael Schwander and Knut Partes. A review of diamond synthesis by CVD processes. Diamond and Related Materials, 20(9):1287–1301, 2011.
  • [50] F. P. Bundy, H. T. Hall, H. M. Strong, and R. H. Wentorf. Man-Made Diamonds. Nature, 176(4471):51–55, 7 1955.
  • [51] H. Sumiya and S. Satoh. High-pressure synthesis of high-purity diamond crystal. Diamond and Related Materials, 5(11):1359–1365, 1996.
  • [52] H Kanda. Large diamonds grown at high pressure conditions. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 30(3):482–489, 2000.
  • [53] Christopher Brett Hartland. A study of point defects in CVD diamond using electron paramagnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, 2014.
  • [54] Alexander M. Zaitsev. Optical Properties of Diamond. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001.
  • [55] G S Woods, J. A. Van Wyk, and A T Collins. The nitrogen content of type Ib synthetic diamond. Philosophical Magazine B, 62(6):589–595, 12 1990.
  • [56] Lukasz Cywiński, Roman M. Lutchyn, Cody P. Nave, and S. Das Sarma. How to enhance dephasing time in superconducting qubits. Physical Review B, 77(17):174509, 5 2008.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
375336
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description