DBI Galileon in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation: Orthogonal nonGaussianities and constraints from the Trispectrum
Abstract
Very few explicit inflationary scenarios are known to generate a large bispectrum of orthogonal shape. DiracBornInfeld Galileon inflation, in which an induced gravity term is added to the DBI action, is one such model. We formulate it in the language of the effective field theory of inflation by identifying the unitary gauge operators that govern the behavior of its cosmological fluctuations. We show how to recover rather easily from this its power spectrum and bispectrum, which we calculated previously using standard cosmological perturbation theory. We push our calculations up to the determination of the fourthorder action and of the trispectrum, in which shapes absent in kinflation arise due to the presence of higherorder derivative operators. We finally discuss the combined constraints set on this model by current observational bounds on the bispectrum and trispectrum.
1,2]Sébastien RenauxPetel
DBI Galileon in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation: Orthogonal nonGaussianities and constraints from the Trispectrum

Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies, University Paris 6, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France.

Sorbonne Universités, Institut Lagrange de Paris (ILP), 98 bis Bd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France.
Keywords: inflation, nongaussianity, cosmological perturbation theory, cosmological parameters from CMBR
Contents
1 Introduction
The deviation from perfect Gaussian statistics of the primordial fluctuations promises to allow a more precise discrimination between competing scenarios of the early Universe than has hitherto been possible (see for instance [1, 5] for recent reviews). In this respect, one of the important realization of the last decade has been the identification of a dictionary between, on one side, various mechanisms for generating the primordial curvature perturbation and, on the other side, various momentumdependences of its threepoint correlation function, i.e. various shapes of the primordial bispectrum [6, 7]. The three best known shapes, local [8], equilateral [9] and orthogonal [10], have two distinct well understood physical origins. The former is generated classically by the nonlinear evolution of the primordial fluctuations on superHubble scales and it is associated to the presence of several degrees of freedom during inflation [11, 12] (or other competing earlyuniverse scenarios). The last two are generated quantummechanically by derivative interactions that force correlations amongst fluctuations of similar wavelengths, in models with nonstandard kinetic terms, single or multifield [13, 14, 15, 16]. The difference between the equilateral and the orthogonal shape then only results from details of the amplitudes at which various derivative interactions get excited, which is naturally formulated in the language of the effective field theory of inflation [17].
In terms of explicit scalar field realizations, archetypal scenarios that generate the local and the equilateral shapes are well known, like the curvaton [18] and DBI inflation [19, 13] respectively^{1}^{1}1Naturally, these two shapes do not constitute separate possibilities and a linear combination of them can be present in the same model, like in multifield DBI inflation [20].. Similarly, we find it important to have at hand concrete microphysical earlyuniverse scenarios able to generate a large orthogonal bispectrum, all the more so as the WMAP nineyear analysis indicated a (nonsignificant) hint of such a signal [21]. DiracBornInfeld Galileon (DBI Galileon) inflation, considered in references [22, 23], provides the first and one of the very few examples of such a model^{2}^{2}2Interestingly, a bispectrum with a significant overlap with the orthogonal shape was recently shown to arise naturally in a different setup [24].. Its origin is physically transparent and its action can be written in simple geometrical terms: it consists in supplementing the DBI action, describing the motion of a probe D3brane, with an induced gravity term. It can hence effectively be seen as an extension of the well known DBI inflationary scenario with only one new dimensionless parameter setting the strength of the induced gravity. When varying the latter, the shape of the bispectrum varies continuously, interpolating between highly correlated and highly anticorrelated with the equilateral template, while it is of the orthogonal type in a transitionary region.
The purpose of the present paper is twofold. As the orthogonal shape has been first motivated and constructed in the effective field theory formalism, we would like to formulate the DBI Galileon model in this language, i.e. to identify the operators and related mass scales entering into the Lagrangian describing its fluctuations. As we will see, the way the orthogonal shape appears in this model is similar to, but different in details from, the one in its original construction in [10]. Our second aim is to investigate the possibility of observationally falsifying DBI Galileon inflation as an inflationary scenario candidate for explaining the large orthogonal bispectrum suggested in WMAP data [21]. Indeed, we recently pointed out the fact that the trispectrum can be used, already with current data, to constrain such candidates in the simplest theoretical framework [25]. Although the two setups are different, we will see that similar conclusions can also be reached here, and that the trispectrum is putting the DBI Galileon model under strong observational pressure, at least in the region favored by WMAP9 constraints on the bispectrum.
The plan of our paper is the following: in section 2, we introduce the DBI Galileon model and briefly discuss its background evolution. In section 3, we formulate it in the language of the effective field theory of inflation. We show in particular how to use the latter to recover rather easily the leadingorder quadratic and cubic actions in the cosmological fluctuations, and hence the power spectrum an bispectrum determined in [22, 23]. We also derive the action quadratic in fluctuations, and the primordial trispectrum generated in this model. The section 4 is then devoted to a discussion of its observational status. We conclude in section 5 and collect technical details, lengthy results and some plots in three appendices.
2 DBI Galileon: action and background
In this section, we briefly review the aspects of the DBI Galileon model that are relevant for what follows, referring the reader to [22, 23] for an extensive study of it, in particular its multifield aspects. For simplicity, we consider only its singlefield version here, or equivalently we neglect the influence of the entropic perturbations on the adiabatic one. The action we consider reads
(2.1) 
where the first term is the standard EinsteinHilbert action involving the cosmological metric , the second term is the DiracBornInfeld action [19]
(2.2) 
and the third term is proportional to the EinsteinHilbert Lagrangian of the socalled induced metric^{3}^{3}3In the higherdimensional framework which gives rises to the effective fourdimensional Lagrangian (2.1), the metric (2.3) is proportional to the induced metric on the brane, hence its name.
(2.3) 
We also consider a constant warpfactor for simplicity (see [23] for a discussion of the more general case), acknowledging that the effects of a nonconstant would anyway be negligible in a slowvarying approximation.
In a spatially flat FriedmannLemaîtreRobertsonWalker (FLRW) background spacetime, of metric
(2.4) 
the background equations of motion derived from the action (2.1) can be cast in the simple form^{4}^{4}4As usual in singlefield inflation, the equation of motion derived from varying the action (2.1) with respect to is a consequence of the gravitational equations (2.5)(2.6). [22, 23]
(2.5) 
(2.6) 
where denotes the standard inflationary parameter, with being the Hubble parameter,
(2.7) 
and where ^{5}^{5}5We use the symbol , and not the more conventional , because, contrary to standard brane inflation, does not coincide here with the speed of sound of scalar perturbations.. Like in standard brane inflation, the value of distinguishes the slowroll regime, where and the brane action (2.2) takes a canonical form, from the socalled relativistic, or DBI, regime, where the inflaton almost saturates its speed limit () and . It is this regime, where the nonlinear structure of the action (2.2) must be taken into account and large nonGaussianities are generated, that we are particularly interested in. From Eqs. (2.5)(2.6), one can show that achieving a phase of quasi deSitter expansion – – in the relativistic regime, requires, in addition to the usual condition to enter into the DBI regime
(2.8) 
that
(2.9) 
Despite this restrictive condition on the mass scale associated to the induced gravity, the effects of the latter on the cosmological fluctuations can actually be significant, and are conveniently measured by the dimensionless parameter
(2.10) 
The latter is not necessarily small during inflation, although we will see it has to be less than to avoid the presence of ghosts. In the inflationary regime of interest where the conditions (2.8) and (2.9) are fulfilled, note eventually that Eq. (2.6) reduces to
(2.11) 
At leading order in a slowvarying approximation, we can consider and as constant, and we will see in section 4 how observational constraints on the primordial bispectrum and trispectrum directly translate into constraints on these two parameters.
3 DBI Galileon: fluctuations in the effective field theory
In references [22, 23], we calculated the second and thirdorder action of cosmological fluctuations in DBI Galileon inflation, from which we deduced the corresponding power spectrum and bispectrum of the curvature perturbation . In this section, we show how these results can be recovered in an elegant way in the effective field theory formalism. Moreover, the latter is powerful enough that we are able to derive rather easily the fourthorder action, as necessary for the study of the primordial trispectrum (see [26, 27] for other applications of the effective field theory of inflation to the study of the primordial trispectrum).
We refer the reader to [28, 17] for details about the construction of the effective field theory of inflation, only summarizing here the strategy we followed in our calculation: we first expressed the action (2.1) in the unitary gauge in which the scalar field is unperturbed (subsection 3.1), paying a particular attention to put our result in a convenient form for the second part of the calculation (subsection 3.2), where we used the Stückelberg trick to explicitly reintroduce the scalar perturbation and derive the action governing its dynamics in the decoupling regime in which the mixing with gravity is irrelevant.
3.1 Action in the unitary gauge
We set ourselves in the unitary gauge in which the scalar field is unperturbed, i.e. such that , and use the ADM formalism [29] in which the cosmological metric is written in the form
(3.1) 
where is the spatial metric, is the shift vector and the lapse function. In the unitary gauge, the induced metric (2.3) takes the very simple form
(3.2) 
where only the lapse function
(3.3) 
is modified compared to Eq. (3.1). Using the ADM form of the EinsteinHilbert action, the induced gravity term reads
(3.4) 
where is the scalar Ricci curvature of the spatial metric and is the extrinsic curvature of constant time hypersurfaces. In the effective field theory of inflation as formulated in [17], the d scalar Ricci curvature is traded for the fourdimensional one using GaussCodazzi relations. While this is useful for classification purposes in a general formalism, it turns out here to be easier to use the two variables for practical calculations, as also noted in [30]. Using [17]
(3.5) 
where is the unit vector perpendicular to constant time hypersurfaces (we choose it such that ), and the fact that , we therefore conveniently write
(3.6)  
where in the last line we used the fact that [17]
(3.7) 
as . While the advantage of the mixed form Eq. (3.6) may not be obvious at this stage, it will become transparent in the next subsection where we will explicitly reintroduce the scalar fluctuation . Using Eqs. (3.4) and (3.6), we can finally rewrite the full action (2.1) in the form (convenient for what follows)
(3.8)  
3.2 Reintroducing the Goldstone boson
We aim at deriving the action governing the dynamics of the cosmological fluctuations about the background discussed in section 2. For this purpose, and following [17, 31, 30], we separate Eq. (3.8) into
(3.9) 
where explicitly starts quadratic in the fluctuations , and . As explained in [17], can be set to one by a conformal transformation of . While we could follow this strategy here, we find it more convenient to keep a nontrivial , as arising naturally from the first line in Eq. (3.8). In this sense, although we are dealing with a phase of singleclock inflation, we are actually using the tools of the effective field theory of dark energy as developed in [31, 30] (note that the difference between the formalisms of the effective field theory of inflation and of dark energy is mainly semantic, the two being primarily effective field theories of adiabatic fluctuations about a FLRW background; see the seminal reference [28] where applications to both contexts were first considered). We leave the explicit form of , and to the appendix A, where we also give details of the intermediate steps that lead to the result with
up to quartic order in fluctuations. Here, we kept leading order terms in the relativistic regime and in a slowvarying approximation. In particular, we neglected terms involving timederivatives of (it is easy to take them into account if needed), arising for instance from the fourth line in Eq. (3.8). This is an important result of our paper: the identification of the operators and related mass scales that specify the DBI Galileon model in the effective field theory of inflation in the unitary gauge. The first line (respectively second and third) contains the terms that start explicitly quadratic (respectively cubic and quartic) in the fluctuations. Note that the result simplifies considerably for the DBI model, corresponding to , and for which the only present operators are powers of .
While Eq. (3.2) is an important step in our calculation, the true effectiveness of the effective field theory of inflation, however, relies on the gravitational analogue of the equivalence theorem for the longitudinal components of a massive gauge boson [32]: upon performing a time diffeomorphism on the gaugefixed action (3.8)(3.9), thus restoring full timediffeomorphism invariance^{6}^{6}6The field is assumed to transform under the time diffeomorphism as , such that is invariant., one can show that the scalar fluctuation reintroduced this way decouples from the gravitational sector at high enough energies, allowing to neglect the complications of the mixing with gravity. This latter fact was also shown to be valid in the relativistic regime of DBI Galileon inflation in [22, 23], and we consider only this decoupling regime in what follows.
The effect of the Stückelberg diffeomorphism on explicit functions of time is The terms in generated in this process are negligible in the slowvarying approximation and we don’t keep track of them, consistently with the fact that we discarded terms involving derivatives of . Restoring thus only affects the operators through the replacements [17, 31, 30]
(3.11)  
(3.12)  
(3.13)  
(3.14) 
again, in the decoupling regime in which the metric is left unperturbed. Note eventually that is related to the curvature perturbation by the simple relation at linear order and at leading order in a slowvarying approximation [17].
3.2.1 Quadratic action and power spectrum
From the above formulae, it is straightforward to derive the main secondorder action
(3.15) 
in agreement with the one found in [22, 23], and where we used the integration by part . As mentioned in section 2, becomes a ghost when , hence our limitation to the range . From Eq. (3.15), one deduces the speed of sound at which the curvature perturbation propagates:
(3.16) 
Note that for any , there is a limiting value of above which in Eq. (3.16) is greater than one. However, in the relativistic regime in which our calculations are applicable, for , these values are very close to . We will see that the theory becomes strongly coupled as , not surprisingly as the kinetic term in (3.15) goes to zero in this limit. For practical purposes, there is thus no issue of superluminality, as the region where it arises is already excluded by observational bounds on nonGaussianities.
In the almost deSitter regime of interest, in which with the conformal time such that , the linear equation of motion derived from Eq. (3.15) is simply
(3.17) 
whose standard solution with BunchDavies normalization and initial conditions reads (in Fourier space)
(3.18) 
We then easily deduce the power spectrum of the curvature perturbation:
(3.19) 
3.2.2 Cubic action and bispectrum
Around the time of Hubble crossing , it is straightforward to verify from Eq. (3.18) that and . Taking this into account (note in particular that amongst terms with the same number of derivatives, the ones with the highest number of space derivatives dominate in the relativistic regime ), we deduce from Eqs. (3.2) and (3.11)(3.14) the leadingorder cubic action:
(3.21)  
where we made use of
(3.22) 
derived by successive simple integrations by part. Note that the cubic action (3.21) contains terms involving secondorder (spatial) derivatives of (in its second line) as a result of the presence of extrinsic curvature terms in the unitary gauge action (3.2). However, as it was explained in a general context in references [33, 34, 35], it is legitimate to simplify the interacting action of cosmological fluctuations by using the linear equation of motion derived from the quadratic action. Using this fact, one can actually trade the two higher derivative operators and for the singlederivative ones and (see for instance [36] and Eqs. and in [23]). The effective thirdorder action then reads
(3.23) 
with
(3.24)  
(3.25)  
(3.26) 
We thus recovered the cubic action derived in [22, 23], albeit with considerably less effort thanks to the effective field theory formalism. The primordial bispectrum deduced from Eq. (3.23) reads [22, 23]
(3.27) 
where is the primordial power spectrum given in Eq. (3.19) and the shape function
(3.28) 
is a linear combination (function of ) of
(3.29)  
(3.30) 
where . The bispectrum generated in DBI Galileon inflation can not be mapped to the one through which the orthogonal shape was introduced in reference [10] (note though that the effects of higherderivative operators are discussed there as well). Yet, its qualitative features are similar: its overall amplitude is fixed by the speed of sound (or equivalently by ) while its shape depends continuously on a dimensionless parameter (here ). In particular, the former interpolates between highly anticorrelated (respectively correlated) with the equilateral template as (respectively ), while being of the orthogonal type in a transitionary region centered around . This is shown in Fig. 1 where we plot the scalar product, in the sense defined in [7], between the DBI Galileon shape (3.28) and the equilateral and orthogonal shapes as a function of (see [23] for more details and section 4 for observational constraints).
3.2.3 Quartic action and trispectrum
Following the same logic that led to the cubic action (3.21) from Eqs. (3.2) and (3.11)(3.14), we find the leadingorder quartic action
(3.32)  
Similarly to the case of the cubic action, one can simplify (3.32) by using the linear equation of motion (3.17), leading to (see appendix B for intermediate steps):
(3.34)  
which can not be further simplified, i.e. where the quartic operators are independent of each other. This fourthorder action can be usefully compared to its counterpart in kinflation [37] (see also [38]). One observes that the two operators in and , which, as we stress again, can not be traded for the three other ones, are not generated in kinflation. This is to be contrasted with the cubic action (3.23) and is a direct consequence of the presence of higherderivative operators involving extrinsic curvature terms in the unitary gauge action (3.2).
We find then that the primordial trispectrum generated in DBI Galileon inflation reads
(3.35) 
with and
(3.36) 
being the sum of 8 contributions: 5 contactinteraction trispectra – corresponding to the 5 quartic operators in (3.34) – and 3 scalarexchange trispectra , solely determined by the cubic (and quadratic) action (3.23). We use the same notations as in [37] for and , whose explicit and lengthy expressions can be found there, while we defined
(3.37)  
(3.38)  
for the trispectra generated respectively by the higherderivative operators and (here and the ‘’ stands for the permutations of the 4 wavevectors ). We leave the explicit expressions of the dimensionless coefficients and (functions of ) to the appendix B, where we also give details about the calculations leading to the result (3.36). Besides the appearance of the new shapes (3.37) and (3.38), let us stress one important difference compared to the trispectrum generated in kinflation. There, the specific combination of the coefficients of the cubic action and of and are such that these two operators cancel at leading order in the quartic Hamiltonian. Such cancellations do not arise in our model, where and contribute at leadingorder (i.e. as ) to the trispectrum (3.36).
4 Observational constraints
In its original construction, the orthogonal shape of the bispectrum arises as the outcome of the competition between two equilateraltype shapes [10] (although in a substantial fraction of parameter space). This implies that generating an orthogonal bispectrum at the level suggested in WMAP data requires in this context a speed of sound of inflaton perturbations as low as about . Unless inflation occurred in the region of parameter space where similar competitions that leads to the orthogonal bispectrum arise at the level of the trispectrum, the amplitude of the latter, scaling as , is of order and hence is comparable to (and greater than) current observational constraint [39]. DBI Galileon inflation does not belong to the simple of class of models in which we quantitatively developed this argument in [25], and the results derived there can not be simply applied here. Yet, we have seen that the two frameworks share similar qualitative features and it is therefore reasonable to expect similar constraints on this model from the trispectrum. We investigate this question in what follows, equipped with the predictions of the preceding section.
4.1 Constraints from the primordial bispectrum
In [21], the WMAP team translated observational constraints on the primordial bispectrum to constraints on the two parameters specifying the cubic action of the simplest effective field theory of inflation. As the bispectrum (3.28) generated in DBI Galileon inflation is similar to the one generated in this framework (it is a linear combination of the same two shapes), it is trivial to perform the same analysis here. In particular, Eq. (57) in [21] directly translates here to
(4.1)  
(4.2) 
where , and are given in Eqs. (3.24)(3.26). This provides the link between the two dimensionless parameters of our model and the two parameters as constrained by WMAP9. Following exactly the same logic as the one in [21], we then easily deduce the , and confidence regions displayed in Fig. 2.
They are qualitatively similar to the constraints on the parameters of the simplest effective field theory of inflation given in [21]. In particular, the region favored by data (in red) corresponds to low values of of about 0.01 and to the narrow region where the bispectrum (3.28) significantly overlaps with the orthogonal template (see Fig. 1). The fact that a negative is favored at translates at this level of confidence into the lower bound (in orange). Note also that as , the amplitude of and in Eqs. (4.1)(4.2) grow unboundedly, corresponding to a strongly coupled region. This explains the sharpness of the bound on in the upper half region. Conversely, for , the bispectrum (3.28) is of equilateral type and is nearly insensitive to the strength of the induced gravity.
4.2 Constraints from the primordial trispectrum
A simple measure of the amplitude of the trispectrum is given by the parameter defined such that [37]
(4.3) 
where stands for the regular tetrahedron limit . While the evaluation at this single point might seem rather adhoc, it can be motivated by the fact that trispectra of quantum origin generated around the time of Hubble crossing are generally the largest for the configurations where both the external and internal momenta are of similar magnitude, i.e. near this regular tetrahedron limit. This was shown explicitly in reference [37] for the trispectra and , and this can easily be checked to hold as well for and in Eqs. (3.37)(3.38).
Using this similarity, the observational constraint relevant for our purpose, , was derived in [39] (based on methods developed in [40]) under the assumption that the trispectrum shape in Eq. (3.35) can be well approximated by the simple and representative ‘equilateraltype’ shape generated by the operator :
(4.4) 
More precisely, this constraint – the only one to date on a trispectrum from quantum origin – puts a bound on the parameter defined such that . It is therefore only applicable in our model for values of such that the trispectrum (3.36) can be well approximated by . Fortunately, we have checked this to be the case in the interesting region favored (at ) by the observational constraints on the bispectrum (see Fig. 2 in the preceding subsection)^{7}^{7}7Note also that for , allowed values of from bispectrum constraints are such that the amplitude of the trispectrum is too low to be constrained by data.. For this purpose, we used the same strategy as in [25] and represented 2dimensional slices of our trispectrum (3.36) (as a function of ) in different representative limits, as was originally done in [37]. We display the outcome of this procedure for the representative value (in the middle of the region favored by the bispectrum) in appendix C, from which the approximate proportionality with is manifest.
To summarize, the possibility – highlighted in a different context in [25] – of partial cancellations leading to the emergence of an ‘orthogonaltype’ trispectrum qualitatively different from does not arise in DBI Galileon inflation in the interesting range . The estimator (4.3) can hence be reliably compared in this regime to the observational bound (68 % CL). We show in Fig. 3 the confidence level at which DBI Galileon is excluded (or not) by this trispectrum constraint, i.e. the represented quantity is , where and . The upper figure (respectively the lower figure) displays the whole region (respectively zooms in the region) favored by the bispectrum constraints, for . The conclusion is clear: within the region favored by observational constraints on the bispectrum, most of the parameter space is already excluded by the observational bound on the trispectrum, while the amplitude of the latter is too small outside this region to be efficiently constrained by data.
5 Conclusions
The DBI Galileon model, in which an induced gravity term is added to the DBI action, is one of the few known explicit inflationary scenarios able to generate a large primordial bispectrum with a significant overlap with the orthogonal template. As the latter was first motivated in the formalism of the effective field theory of inflation, we formulated DBI Galileon in this language. In particular, we identified the various operators and related mass scales that specify the behavior of its fluctuations in the unitary gauge. As a consequence of the presence of higherderivative operators, we have seen that the way the orthogonal shape arises here differs in details from the one in its original construction. Furthermore, we determined the leadingorder action quartic in fluctuations, and calculated the corresponding trispectrum. In the region of parameter space in which the orthogonaltype bispectrum is generated, we found that the former can be very well approximated by the simple ‘equilateral’ trispectrum used in current data analysis. Translating the corresponding observational bound on constraints on the parameters of the model, we showed the combined consideration of the bi and trispectrum to be very discriminating. In particular, it is only in a small window of parameter space that DBI Galileon inflation can both generate a bispectrum within the region favored by WMAP9 data without at the same time generating too large a trispectrum. It will certainly be interesting to compare the predictions derived here to the results of future observations, and in particular to the forthcoming ones of Planck.
On a more theoretical side, we believe several aspects our calculations to be interesting in their own right. In particular, although we considered an inflationary model, we actually made use of tools developed in the context of the effective field theory of dark energy [31, 30] (see [28] for the first paper in this context). The reason behind this is that some aspects of the effective field theory of inflation, as formulated in [17], are useful for classification purposes in a general formalism, but may be less so for practical calculations in concrete models. For instance, although it is always possible, through a conformal transformation of the metric, to set to one the function in front of the Ricci scalar in Eq. (3.9), it turned out to be simpler not to do so here, related to the fact that there is no Einstein frame in the DBI Galileon model. Similarly, although one can always trade the 3d Riemann tensor and covariant derivative for their 4d counterparts, keeping both type of quantities greatly simplified our calculations. Eventually, note that, by using the linear equation of motion to simplify the interacting action, we showed that the presence of higherderivative operators in the unitary gauge action Eq. (3.2) manifests itself as higherderivative interactions at the level of the quartic action only, and it would be interesting to study this in more generality.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank David Langlois, Kazuya Koyama, Shuntaro Mizuno, Guido W. Pettinari and Filippo Vernizzi for useful conversations related to the topic of this paper, as well as the anonymous referee for helping improving some explanations. This work was supported by French state funds managed by the ANR within the Investissements d’Avenir programme under reference ANR11IDEX000402.
Appendix A Calculations in the effective field theory formalism
In this appendix, we give some details about the calculations performed in subsection 3.2.
The derivation of Eqs. (3.9) and (3.2) from the action Eq. (3.8) follows the steps described in [17] to show that any singleclock model of inflation can be cast in the form (3.9). In more details: the way we wrote down Eq. (3.8) is such that its first line is already in the desired form. As has no background value, i.e. , the third line is such that it only contributes to , as times powers of . The last line, corresponding to the DBI scenario, without induced gravity, can be simply expanded in powers of . For the second line, we conveniently write
(A.1) 
where terms linear in , here and coming from the fourth line, are dealt with using