Dark Higgs Bosons at FASER
FASER, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, has been proposed as a small, very far forward detector to discover new, light, weakly-coupled particles. Previous work showed that with a total volume of just , FASER can discover dark photons in a large swath of currently unconstrained parameter space, extending the discovery reach of the LHC program. Here we explore FASER’s discovery prospects for dark Higgs bosons. These scalar particles are an interesting foil for dark photons, as they probe a different renormalizable portal interaction and are produced dominantly through and meson decays, rather than pion decays, leading to less collimated signals. Nevertheless, we find that FASER is also a highly sensitive probe of dark Higgs bosons with significant discovery prospects that are comparable to, and complementary to, much larger proposed experiments.
At present, no particles beyond the standard model (SM) have been found at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). So far, attention has typically focused on hypothetical heavy particles with SM gauge interactions, which give rise to high signatures, and the ATLAS and CMS experiments are optimized for such searches. But light particles with milli-charged and weaker couplings are increasingly motivated (see, e.g., Ref. Battaglieri:2017aum ()), and are predominantly produced with low . Such particles may have escaped detection at the LHC because they pass undetected down the beam pipe, are long-lived and decay after leaving existing detectors, or both.
In a previous paper Feng:2017uoz (), we proposed that a new experiment, FASER (ForwArd Search ExpeRiment), be placed in the far forward region of either the ATLAS or CMS detector regions with the goal of discovering such new, light, weakly-coupled particles. We considered two representative on-axis locations: a near location between the beampipes, after the neutral target absorber (TAN, or TAXN in the HL-LHC era), and roughly 135 m downstream; and a far location after the beamlines enter an arc, 400 m downstream. In both locations, we found that a small cylindrical detector (4 cm in radius and 5 m deep in the near location, 20 cm in radius and 10 m deep in the far location) has significant discovery potential for new light particles. As an example, we considered dark photons and found that for masses and micro- to milli-charged couplings (), FASER could discover dark photons in a wide swath of currently unconstrained parameter space, with comparable sensitivity to other, much larger, proposed experiments.
In this study, we consider FASER’s discovery potential for dark Higgs bosons. As with dark photons that interact with the SM through a kinetic mixing term, dark Higgs bosons probe one of the few possible renormalizable interactions with a hidden sector, the Higgs portal quartic scalar interaction Patt:2006fw (). In addition, dark Higgs bosons have numerous cosmological implications. Like dark photons, they may mediate interactions with hidden dark matter (DM) that has the correct thermal relic density Feng:2008ya () or resolves small scale structure discrepancies Tulin:2017ara (). Additionally, a dark Higgs boson may be the inflaton, providing a rare possibility to probe inflation in particle physics experiments Shaposhnikov:2006xi (); Bezrukov:2009yw (); Bezrukov:2013fca (); Bramante:2016yju ().
From an experimental perspective, dark Higgs bosons are an interesting foil for dark photons. Dark Higgs bosons mix with the SM Higgs boson and so inherit the property of coupling preferentially to heavy particles. Dark Higgses are therefore dominantly produced in and meson decays, in contrast to dark photons, which are primarily produced in and light meson decays. As a consequence, dark Higgs bosons are produced with greater and are less collimated, providing a challenging test case for FASER. In addition, the trilinear scalar coupling , where is the SM Higgs boson and is the dark Higgs bosons, can be probed both at FASER, through the double dark Higgs process , and through searches for the exotic SM Higgs decays . We will evaluate FASER’s sensitivity to both – mixing and the coupling, and compare them to other current and proposed experiments, such as NA62 NA62 (), SHiP Alekhin:2015byh (), MATHUSLA Chou:2016lxi (); Curtin:2017izq (); Evans:2017lvd (), and CODEX-b Gligorov:2017nwh (). Throughout this study, we consider FASER in the high luminosity era and assume an integrated luminosity of at the 13 TeV LHC.
This study is organized as follows. In Sec. II we discuss dark Higgs bosons and their properties. In Secs. III and IV we determine FASER’s sensitivity to – mixing and the trilinear coupling, respectively. We then note interesting implications for DM and inflation in Sec. V and present our conclusions in Sec. VI.
Ii Dark Higgs Properties
If the SM is extended to include a hidden real scalar field , the most general scalar Lagrangian is
where is the SM electroweak Higgs doublet, and the last term is the Higgs portal quartic scalar interaction. To determine the physical particles and their properties, one must minimize the scalar potential and diagonalize the mass terms. The resulting physical particles are a SM-like Higgs particle and a dark Higgs boson . The parameters are constrained by the SM-like Higgs boson’s vacuum expectation value (vev) and mass , but in general, five free parameters remain. The number of free parameters can be reduced in specific models, for example, by invoking a discrete symmetry for to set , or by invoking such a discrete symmetry and further setting Bezrukov:2009yw (); Bezrukov:2013fca () or Bramante:2016yju () by hand.
For our purposes, it is most convenient to adopt a phenomenological parameterization, where the Lagrangian for the physical dark Higgs boson is
where the omitted terms include additional cubic and quartic scalar interactions involving and . Current experimental constraints require and . We will refer to the three parameters,
as the dark Higgs boson mass, mixing angle, and trilinear coupling, respectively. They determine all of the phenomenological properties of interest here and will be taken as independent parameters throughout this study.
ii.1 Dark Higgs Decays
The dark Higgs decay widths are suppressed by relative to those of a SM Higgs boson with identical mass. We will assume that there are no hidden sector decay modes. For , then, the dark Higgs decays primarily to either or with decay width
where . In the mass range , the decay widths are complicated by decays to mesons and the effects of resonances, and there is no consensus regarding their values in the literature Clarke:2013aya (). We adopt the numerical results of Ref. Bezrukov:2013fca (), which incorporate the results of Ref. Donoghue:1990xh () for the mass range , use the spectator model Gunion:1989we (); McKeen:2008gd () for the high-mass range , and interpolate between these two for the intermediate mass range .
The resulting decay lengths are shown in Fig. 1. Because the decays are both Yukawa- and -suppressed, for currently viable values of and energies , dark Higgs decay lengths can be very long. Below the muon threshold, i.e., for , the tiny electron Yukawa coupling leads to an extremely long dark Higgs lifetime, resulting in a negligible event rate in FASER, as most dark Higgs bosons typically overshoot the detector. On the other hand, for and energies , decay lengths are possible, and a significant number of dark Higgs bosons can pass through many LHC infrastructure components and decay within the FASER volume.
The dark Higgs branching fractions are shown in Fig. 2. As shown there, above the muon threshold, the decay mode dominates in the narrow region , but for larger masses, the dominant decay modes are to pions, kaons, and other hadrons. This differs markedly from the dark photon case, where leptonic decays are significant for most of the mass range.
ii.2 Dark Higgs Production
In this section, we discuss the dominant production mechanisms for dark Higgs bosons: , , and light meson decays.
Dark Higgs bosons can also be produced through other processes. For example, they may be radiated off a quark line and be produced in processes or , or through the vector boson fusion processes .111The contributions from processes such as gluon-gluon fusion cannot be reliably estimated, since the parton distribution functions suffer from large uncertainties when the light dark Higgs is produced in the forward direction Feng:2017uoz (). In principle, such processes could extend the reach of FASER to masses . We have checked, however, that, for currently viable values of dark Higgs parameters, such processes do not contribute significantly to dark Higgs rates in FASER, and so we focus instead on the meson decay processes in this study.
Single dark Higgs bosons may be produced in meson decays through – mixing. The rates are proportional to and, since the dark Higgs inherits the couplings of the SM Higgs, the branching ratios are largest for processes involving heavy flavors, in particular, mesons.
The inclusive decay of mesons into dark Higgs bosons is dominated by the parton-level process containing a – loop, with the radiated from the top quark. Uncertainties from strong interaction effects are minimized in the ratio Grinstein:1988yu (); Chivukula:1988gp ()
where denote any strange and charm hadronic state, and . Given for both and , and since the total width is -independent for , we find
Here and below we take the quark masses to be , , , and we use the most recent values of meson decay widths and CKM parameters Patrignani:2016xqp (). In the following, we apply Eq. (6) to obtain the production rate in meson decays, which we regard as a two-body decay. In doing so, we neglect small kinematic effects which may arise when is a multi-body state.
ii.2.2 and Light Meson Decays
where and . The third term is from – loop diagrams, and it is again dominated by the top contribution. The branching fractions for the physical kaon states are
where , with , is the dark Higgs boson’s three-momentum in the parent meson’s rest frame. The ratio is unity for . is suppressed relative to the others primarily by the relatively large total decay width, but also by the small -violating phase in the CKM matrix.
Dark Higgs bosons may also be produced in the decays of light mesons, for example, through processes with branching fractions Gunion:1989we (), Leutwyler:1989xj (); Kozlov:1995yd (), and , where Dawson:1989kr ().
As expected, the branching fractions have the hierarchy . The numbers of kaons and light mesons produced at the LHC are very roughly comparable, and so, given the hierarchy in branching fractions, kaon decay is always a more effective production mechanism for dark Higgs bosons than light meson decay. The number of mesons produced at the LHC is, of course, suppressed relative to kaons, but the larger branching fraction compensates for this, and also decays probe much higher . Given these considerations, we will show results for and decays below, and neglect those for light meson decays.
Iii Probes of Dark Higgs-SM Higgs Mixing
Given the production and decay properties of dark Higgs bosons described in Sec. II, we now determine the sensitivity of FASER to dark Higgs bosons produced through – mixing. In Sec. III.1 we describe the parent meson and dark Higgs boson kinematic distributions at the LHC. In Sec. III.2 we determine the number of dark Higgs bosons that decay in FASER, for various possible realizations of FASER, and in Sec. III.3 we estimate the discovery potential for dark Higgs bosons in the parameter space.
iii.1 Meson and Dark Higgs Boson Distributions
To determine the dark Higgs boson event yield in FASER, we first simulate and production in the very far forward region at the LHC. For kaons, we follow the procedure described in Ref. Feng:2017uoz () and use the Monte-Carlo event generator EPOS-LHC Pierog:2013ria (), as implemented in the CRMC simulation package CRMC ().
To simulate mesons, we use the simulation tool FONLL Cacciari:1998it (); Cacciari:2012ny (); Cacciari:2015fta (), which calculates the differential cross section . This is obtained from a convolution of a perturbative partonic production cross section with a non-perturbative fragmentation function, which follows a Kartvelishvili et al. distribution with fragmentation parameter Kartvelishvili:1977pi (); Cacciari:2005uk (). The dominant contribution to production comes from the parton-level process . The typical momentum transfer for this process in the far forward direction, where , is . The partonic center-of-mass energy is bounded from below by . For the 13 TeV LHC, then, -quark pair production receives contributions from momentum fractions as low as . For momentum transfers , the parton distribution functions (pdfs) are well behaved even at this low , but suffer from uncertainties as large as a factor of 2. We use the CTEQ 6.6 pdfs with .
In the top left and bottom left panels of Fig. 3, we show the kinematic distributions of and mesons in the and planes, respectively, where and are the meson’s angle with respect to the beam axis and momentum, respectively. With an integrated luminosity of , the 13 TeV LHC produces mesons and kaons in each hemisphere, and these are clustered around and , respectively.
To derive the dark Higgs distributions from the meson distributions, we decay each and meson in the Monte Carlo sample. mesons decay essentially at the IP; kaons travel macroscopic distances before decaying, and we scan over the kaon decay positions with the proper weighting. We further consider only kaons that decay before colliding with the beampipe at a transverse distance of 3 cm, and restrict our attention to mesons that decay before reaching the TAN/TAXN at and to mesons that decay before being deflected by the Q1 magnet at .
The dark Higgs boson distributions are shown in Fig. 3 for model parameters for decays (top center) and for kaons (bottom center). The dominant contribution from kaons is from decays,222The distribution is clustered around , and along this line, there are two dominant populations with energies around 1-10 GeV and 100-1000 GeV. Those with intermediate energies are removed by the requirement that the kaon decay within the beampipe. with a subleading contribution from decays. The contribution is suppressed by a factor of 20 relative to the contribution; the short lifetime reduces the branching ratio to dark Higgs bosons, but also guarantees that all decay before hitting the TAXN. Despite the suppression of branching fractions by , we see that, even for , for an integrated luminosity of at the 13 TeV LHC, and decays each produce dark Higgs bosons that are boosted toward FASER.
iii.2 Dark Higgs Decay Inside Detector
To determine the number of dark Higgs bosons that decay in FASER, we must specify the size, shape, and location of FASER. As in Ref. Feng:2017uoz (), we consider cylindrical detectors centered on the beam collision axis with radius and depth , where () is the distance from the IP to the far (near) edge of the detector along the beam axis. We consider two representative detector locations:
The far detector is placed along the beam axis after the beam tunnel starts to curve. The near location is located between the beams and between the TAN/TAXN neutral particle absorber and the D2 dipole magnet. The rationale for these locations is given in Ref. Feng:2017uoz (). Other locations between the near and far location (or even in an existing service tunnel slightly beyond the far location Feng:2017uoz ()) may be more feasible, but we will present results for these two as they represent two natural extremes. Note that, in addition to the far detector with studied in Ref. Feng:2017uoz (), we also consider a larger detector with , for reasons that will become clear below.
In the case of dark Higgs bosons produced in decays, which typically occurs very close to the IP, the probability of a dark Higgs boson to decay inside the detector volume is
where the first term is the probability that the dark Higgs boson decays within the interval, and the second term enforces the angular acceptance of the detector. For kaon decays, since kaons travel macroscopic distances before decaying, Eq. (10) is modified to take into account both the horizontal and vertical displacement of the position at which the dark Higgs boson is produced. In the right panels of Fig. 3, we show the number of dark Higgs bosons decaying in the far location range . We see that only very energetic particles with have a sufficient decay length to reach the detector.
In Fig. 4 we explore the dependence of the signal rates at the far location on the detector radius . We consider the two model parameter points selected previously: and , which correspond to and , respectively. In the first scenario, , and so the dark Higgs production is predominantly through meson decays. To reach FASER, the dark Higgs boson must have a large boost factor corresponding to energies above , as seen in the top right panel of Fig. 3. Dark Higgs bosons with such high energies are already very collimated, and extending the detector radius from to does not dramatically improve the signal acceptance, as seen in Fig. 4.
In the second case, the dark Higgs bosons is both lighter and longer lived, so the spectrum of dark Higgs bosons that can decay in FASER extends to lower energies. In contrast to the former scenario, for this benchmark, , so dark Higgs bosons are produced in both and decays. For the decays, lower energies imply that the signal is less collimated, and indeed, as can be seen in Fig. 4, extending the detector radius from to improves the signal event yield by two orders of magnitude. On the other hand, the kaon distributions are highly collimated as they are centered along , and the effect on the signal from kaon decays is therefore negligible.
iii.3 Mixing Reach
We now estimate the reach in dark Higgs parameter space at FASER. In Fig. 5 we show contours of the expected number of signal events, assuming 100% efficiency in detecting dark Higgs boson decays in FASER. The green and red contours indicate the production processes and , where all kaon species are included. The three panels correspond to the three detector setups specified in Eq. (9). In our simulations, we employed a cut on the dark Higgs momentum, , which is anyway effectively imposed by the requirement that the dark Higgs bosons propagate to the detector locations considered.
The gray-shaded regions of parameter space have already been excluded by previous experiments. The low-mass regime is excluded primarily by the CHARM experiment, a beam dump experiment searching for long-lived particles produced mostly in kaon decays and decaying into lepton or photon pairs Bergsma:1985qz (); Bezrukov:2009yw (). In the intermediate-mass regime, , the strongest constraints are from LHCb searches for Aaij:2015tna () and Aaij:2016qsm () containing a possibly displaced di-muon resonance.
From Fig. 5, we see that, if backgrounds can be reduced to negligible levels, as discussed in Ref. Feng:2017uoz (), FASER will be able to probe the remaining gap between the CHARM and LHCb constraints using dark Higgs bosons produced in both the and channels. The channel will further be able to probe a currently unconstrained region of parameter space in the mass range for couplings . The reach at FASER drops rapidly when the channels open up, given the corresponding sharp drop in dark Higgs lifetime. Comparing the three panels in Fig. 5, we see that a far detector with relatively large radius has the largest reach.
The projected reaches Evans:2017lvd () of NA62 NA62 () and the proposed SHiP Alekhin:2015byh (), MATHUSLA Chou:2016lxi (), and CODEX-b Gligorov:2017nwh () experiments are shown in the bottom right panel of Fig. 5.333SeaQuest, a proton beam dump experiment at Fermilab, is not competitive in the search for dark Higgs bosons because its center-of-mass energy results in a small meson production rate. This is in contrast to the case of dark photons, which are produced in light meson decays and through dark bremsstrahlung Gardner:2015wea (). These experiments probe similar ranges of dark Higgs lifetimes, and are therefore only sensitive in the range, since for (), the dark Higgs is too prompt (long-lived). FASER’s reach exceeds the projections for NA62. Its reach in is complementary to the three other experiments: while there is significant overlap, SHiP, MATHUSLA, and CODEX-b are more sensitive at relatively low , while FASER covers the relatively high region, particularly the region with and , which is not covered by the other experiments.
To understand the complementarity of FASER and other experiments, as a specific example, consider FASER and SHiP with . The advantage of a fixed-target experiment like SHiP is that it has far more collisions than a collider experiment. However, the number of mesons produced at SHiP, Alekhin:2015byh (), is less than the number produced at the LHC for FASER, , because SHiP’s center-of-mass energy is much lower. Even more important is the difference in the probabilities of dark Higgs bosons decaying in the detector (see Eq. (10)). In our notation, the distance scales of SHiP are , and Alekhin:2015byh (). From Fig. 1 we see that SHiP’s beam energy is too small to produce dark Higgs bosons with the momenta that are required for . Instead, mesons produced at SHiP can have energies of at most which leads to a suppression of the dark Higgs event rate of at least , where we have assumed the maximal possible energy . In practice, most mesons are produced with far smaller energies, only part of which is transferred to the dark Higgs, implying a far stronger exponential suppression. For example, the SHiP collaboration Alekhin:2015byh () (following CHARM Bergsma:1985qz ()), finds a mean dark Higgs energy of , implying a suppression factor of . Last, SHiP’s angular acceptance requires , while for dark Higgs bosons with and , we find . As shown in Fig. 4, at least for FASER on the far location with , essentially all dark Higgs bosons that decay near satisfy the angular acceptance requirement. All of these effects lead to FASER having better coverage than SHiP for . Of course, for low values of , the decay lengths are larger, and, as we see in Fig. 5, SHiP is a more sensitive experiment. FASER is sensitive to such small only through processes induced by the trilinear coupling, to which we now turn.
Iv Probes of the Dark Higgs Boson Trilinear Coupling
FASER can also probe the trilinear coupling , as this coupling induces the double dark Higgs production process , leading to dark Higgs bosons that then decay into SM particles. The production rate is controlled by the coupling in Eq. (2), while the lifetime depends on the mixing angle . In Sec. IV.1 we discuss the kinematic distributions of dark Higgs bosons produced through . In Sec. IV.2, we then determine the number of dark Higgs bosons from double dark Higgs events that could be seen in FASER.
iv.1 Dark Higgs Pair Production in Decays
The transition may be described by the effective Lagrangian Bird:2004ts ()
Following Ref. Altmannshofer:2009ma (), the inclusive differential decay width is
where . Taking the limit and integrating over from to , we find
For , .
The decay kinematics can be specified by five parameters: , the polar and azimuthal angles of the off-shell Higgs in the -quark rest frame, and the polar and azimuthal angles of the dark Higgs bosons in the off-shell Higgs rest frame. To simulate the 3-body decay, we scan over and integrate over the rest of the parameters via Monte Carlo.
In the top left panel of Fig. 6, we show the distribution of dark Higgs bosons produced in in the plane. We have set and , corresponding to (see below). The typical transverse momentum of the produced dark Higgs bosons is . The top right panel of Fig. 6 shows the distribution of dark Higgs bosons that decay in the far detector range , assuming a coupling for illustration. For these parameters, we see that, despite the highly suppressed branching fraction for , hundreds of dark Higgs bosons can be produced and decay in FASER.
iv.2 Trilinear Coupling Reach
We now evaluate FASER’s sensitivity to and compare it to other probes. In particular, the trilinear coupling also induces the SM Higgs decay with branching fraction
Current limits depend on both and , but for small , where the lifetime is large, these events lead to invisible Higgs decays, which are constrained by searches at CMS Khachatryan:2016whc () and ATLAS Aad:2015txa (); Aaboud:2017bja (). The most stringent current bound of implies .
In the bottom panel of Fig. 6, we set , corresponding to , roughly the sensitivity to invisible decays of the LHC with . We then show the number of dark Higgs bosons from the pair production process that decay in FASER at the far location with . Despite the highly suppressed pair production process, hundreds of dark Higgs bosons from this process could be detected by FASER. The region of parameter space probed by the single and pair production processes are complementary: for currently viable values of , there are regions of the parameter space that can produce pair production signals without single production signals, and vice versa. In this way, FASER is similar to MATHUSLA, which is sensitive to dark Higgs bosons from meson decay and also from pair production in Evans:2017lvd (). We note, however, that, because the regions of sensitivity to single and double production have significant overlap, if a signal is seen, more detailed work is required to determine its origin or bound particular sources.
V Cosmological Connections
As mentioned in Sec. I, searches for dark Higgs bosons have implications for DM and inflation.
v.1 Dark Matter
Searches for dark Higgs bosons have implications for dark matter if they are mediators between the SM and dark sectors. As an example, suppose the dark Higgs boson couples to the SM as given in Eq. (2) and also to Majorana fermion DM through the interaction (see, e.g., Krnjaic:2015mbs ())
We will assume , and that the thermal relic density is determined by the annihilation cross section , since annihilation to SM final states is suppressed by powers of .
For given values of and , the thermal relic density determines , and bounds on the direct detection scattering cross section constrain . As a result, for fixed values of the ratio , current direct detection limits Angloher:2015ewa (); Agnese:2015nto (); Akerib:2016vxi (); Amole:2017dex (); Aprile:2017iyp (); Cui:2017nnn () constrain the plane. These constraints are shown in Fig. 7 for various values of , along with the projected reach of future direct detection experiments Battaglieri:2017aum (). We see that, depending on , FASER can probe regions of the parameter space that are beyond any proposed direct detection experiment. Of course, if signals are seen in both FASER and direct detection, they will provide complementary probes of the dark sector.
Inflatons that are light and can be produced in particle physics experiments are phenomenologically an appealing alternative to the standard paradigm, in which inflatons are assumed to be heavy and therefore effectively decoupled from the SM. In some of these models, the light inflaton is identified with the dark Higgs boson Shaposhnikov:2006xi (); Bezrukov:2009yw (); Bezrukov:2013fca (); Bramante:2016yju (). The scalar Lagrangian is then typically that of Eq. (1) with some parameters set to zero for simplicity.
Specifically, in the model discussed in Refs. Shaposhnikov:2006xi (); Bezrukov:2009yw (); Bezrukov:2013fca (), one sets in Eq. (1). Electroweak symmetry breaking is driven by a non-zero inflaton vev in the Higgs-inflaton mixing term. It was originally found that the preferred mass range for the inflaton in this model is Bezrukov:2009yw (), with a range of that could be probed by FASER. Since the early analyses, however, the SM Higgs boson discovery Aad:2012tfa (); Chatrchyan:2012xdj () and more recent cosmological data Ade:2015xua () overconstrain the original model. To alleviate the tension between the measured and predicted values of the tensor-to-scalar ratio , one can, e.g., introduce a non-minimal coupling of the inflaton field to gravity, as discussed in Ref. Bezrukov:2013fca (). The relatively large values of inferred from such a model can be probed by future CMB observations; for a review, see Abazajian:2016yjj (). At the same time, a complementary search for the light inflaton in FASER would allow one to thoroughly investigate the consistency of the model with the experimental and observational data.
Alternatively, in models with low-scale inflation that predict very small values of beyond the reach of CMB searches, the search for a light inflaton in FASER could be a rare opportunity to test inflation experimentally. In particular, in Ref. Bramante:2016yju () such a possibility is discussed for a model with quartic hilltop inflation. Interestingly, these type of models can also contain another dark-Higgs-like scalar that can be probed in FASER, namely, the curvaton, which is introduced to reproduce the observed spectrum of CMB perturbations.
Accessible new particles can be either relatively strongly interacting and heavy, or very weakly interacting and light. In the latter case, the extraordinary event rates at the LHC, especially in the upcoming high luminosity era, mean that even extremely weakly-interacting new particles can be discovered in the low region along the beamline downstream of the ATLAS and CMS IPs. The motivation of FASER, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, is to exploit this opportunity to discover new physics with a small, inexpensive detector.
In this study, we have explored the potential for FASER to discover dark Higgs bosons, hidden scalars that couple to the SM through the renormalizable Higgs portal interaction. As with SM Higgs bosons, dark Higgs bosons couple preferentially to heavy SM fermions, and so they are dominantly produced through the processes and . At the 13 TeV LHC with , FASER will greatly extend the discovery prospects for dark Higgs bosons. As many as dark Higgs boson can be seen in FASER in currently unexplored parameter space, and FASER may discover dark Higgs bosons with masses and mixing angles . Although FASER’s sensitivity given in Fig. 5 clearly shows a significant overlap with other proposed experiments, FASER is uniquely sensitive in the parameter space with and , for which dark Higgs bosons are typically too prompt to be detected by the other experiments. This result is due to the combination of FASER’s geometric acceptance with the kinematic distribution of dark Higgses produced at the LHC. In addition, FASER may also discover dark Higgs bosons produced through , which probes the trilinear coupling and is complementary to probes of the rare SM Higgs decay ; the reach in this case is shown in Fig. 6.
FASER will probe models of cosmological interest. For example, dark Higgs bosons may mediate interactions between the SM and dark matter particles . For , the required couplings for a thermal relic are , depending on the hidden sector coupling. Such couplings are exactly in FASER’s range of sensitivity. We have shown that FASER’s sensitivity also surpasses current direct detection searches. In addition, FASER is sensitive to viable regions of parameter space in scenarios in which the dark Higgs boson is also the inflaton. If a signal is seen at FASER, it will shed light on inflation in these models, a rare opportunity to probe inflation in particle physics experiments.
The search for dark Higgs bosons has many interesting features when compared to the search for dark photons at FASER Feng:2017uoz (). These two possibilities probe renormalizable couplings of the SM to the hidden sector, which can reasonably be expected to be the leading couplings in many cases. At the same time, there are several qualitative differences:
Dark photons are dominantly produced with , and so are highly collimated even 400 m from the IP, where they may be collected with a cylindrical detector with a radius of only . In contrast, dark Higgs bosons are predominantly produced in decays with , and they are therefore less collimated. A detector with radius 1 m can improve search prospects significantly.
FASER is mainly sensitive to the parameter space in which the dark photons are relatively short-lived (large ), and arrive in FASER only due to their high energy, while the long-lived regime (small ) is already mostly excluded. In contrast, in the dark Higgs case, one typically probes relatively long lifetimes, which, in turn, require smaller boosts and again imply larger angles with respect to the beam axis.
As shown in Fig. 2, the dark Higgs predominantly decays into the heaviest allowed decay mode. At FASER, these are mainly muon, pion and kaon pairs, depending on the dark Higgs mass. A tracker-based technology in combination with a magnetic field will detect the charged particle final states. To detect neutral decay modes, such as , these components could be augmented by an electromagnetic calorimeter and, possibly, a ring-Cherenkov detector.
Here and in Ref. Feng:2017uoz (), we have considered dark Higgs bosons and dark photons separately. Of course, these two new particles may naturally appear together in theories where the dark photon mass is generated by a non-zero vev of a dark Higgs boson. (For a review see, e.g., Ref. Raggi:2015yfk ().) In such theories, the dark photon and dark Higgs boson naturally have similar masses, and they may be simultaneously probed by FASER. In addition, the impact of the interaction term between dark Higgs boson and dark photons, , could significantly alter our discussion of the sensitivity reach of FASER. Specifically, dark Higgs boson decays into two dark photons, , if kinematically allowed, could make a dark Higgs boson discovery much more challenging, but at the same time significantly improve the prospects for a dark photon detection. On the other hand, the number of dark Higgs bosons going towards FASER could be increased by additional processes in which dark photons are produced and then radiate off dark Higgs bosons.
Acknowledgements.We thank Joe Bramante and Jared Evans for useful discussions. This work is supported in part by NSF Grant No. PHY-1620638. J.L.F. is supported in part by Simons Investigator Award #376204. I.G. is supported in part by DOE grants DE-SC0013678 and DOE-SC0010008. F.K. performed part of this work at the Aspen Center for Physics, which is supported by NSF Grant No. PHY-1607611. S.T. is supported in part by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under research grant 1309/MOB/IV/2015/0.
- (1) M. Battaglieri et al., “US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report,” arXiv:1707.04591 [hep-ph].
- (2) J. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, “FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC,” arXiv:1708.09389 [hep-ph].
- (3) B. Patt and F. Wilczek, “Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors,” arXiv:hep-ph/0605188 [hep-ph].
- (4) J. L. Feng and J. Kumar, “The WIMPless Miracle: Dark-Matter Particles without Weak-Scale Masses or Weak Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 231301, arXiv:0803.4196 [hep-ph].
- (5) S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,” arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph].
- (6) M. Shaposhnikov and I. Tkachev, “The nuMSM, inflation, and dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B639 (2006) 414–417, arXiv:hep-ph/0604236 [hep-ph].
- (7) F. Bezrukov and D. Gorbunov, “Light Inflaton Hunter’s Guide,” JHEP 05 (2010) 010, arXiv:0912.0390 [hep-ph].
- (8) F. Bezrukov and D. Gorbunov, “Light inflaton after LHC8 and WMAP9 results,” JHEP 07 (2013) 140, arXiv:1303.4395 [hep-ph].
- (9) J. Bramante, J. Cook, A. Delgado, and A. Martin, “Low Scale Inflation at High Energy Colliders and Meson Factories,” Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 115012, arXiv:1608.08625 [hep-ph].
- (10) NA62 Collaboration, G. Lanfranchi, “Search for Hidden Sector Particles at NA62,”. https://indico.cern.ch/event/466934/contributions/2583562/attachments/1489427/2314489/EPS_2017_Lanfranchi.pdf.
- (11) S. Alekhin et al., “A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 124201, arXiv:1504.04855 [hep-ph].
- (12) J. P. Chou, D. Curtin, and H. J. Lubatti, “New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier,” Phys. Lett. B767 (2017) 29–36, arXiv:1606.06298 [hep-ph].
- (13) D. Curtin and M. E. Peskin, “Analysis of Long Lived Particle Decays with the MATHUSLA Detector,” arXiv:1705.06327 [hep-ph].
- (14) J. A. Evans, “Detecting Hidden Particles with MATHUSLA,” arXiv:1708.08503 [hep-ph].
- (15) V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, “Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb,” arXiv:1708.09395 [hep-ph].
- (16) J. D. Clarke, R. Foot, and R. R. Volkas, “Phenomenology of a very light scalar (100 MeV 10 GeV) mixing with the SM Higgs,” JHEP 02 (2014) 123, arXiv:1310.8042 [hep-ph].
- (17) J. F. Donoghue, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, “The Decay of a Light Higgs Boson,” Nucl. Phys. B343 (1990) 341–368.
- (18) J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, “The Higgs Hunter’s Guide,” Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1–404.
- (19) D. McKeen, “Constraining Light Bosons with Radiative (1S) Decays,” Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 015007, arXiv:0809.4787 [hep-ph].
- (20) B. Grinstein, L. J. Hall, and L. Randall, “Do B meson decays exclude a light Higgs?,” Phys. Lett. B211 (1988) 363–369.
- (21) R. S. Chivukula and A. V. Manohar, “Limits on a Light Higgs Boson,” Phys. Lett. B207 (1988) 86. [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 217, 568 (1989)].
- (22) Particle Data Group Collaboration, C. Patrignani et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Chin. Phys. C40 (2016) 100001.
- (23) H. Leutwyler and M. A. Shifman, “Light Higgs Particle in Decays of and Mesons,” Nucl. Phys. B343 (1990) 369–397.
- (24) G. A. Kozlov, “More remarks on search for a new light scalar boson,” Chin. J. Phys. 34 (1996) 920–923.
- (25) S. Dawson, “Higgs Boson Production in Semileptonic and Decays,” Phys. Lett. B222 (1989) 143–148.
- (26) T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, “EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. C92 (2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph].
- (27) C. Baus, T. Pierog, and R. Ulrich, “Cosmic Ray Monte Carlo (CRMC),”. https://web.ikp.kit.edu/rulrich/crmc.html.
- (28) M. Cacciari, M. Greco, and P. Nason, “The P(T) spectrum in heavy flavor hadroproduction,” JHEP 05 (1998) 007, arXiv:hep-ph/9803400 [hep-ph].
- (29) M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, “Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC,” JHEP 10 (2012) 137, arXiv:1205.6344 [hep-ph].
- (30) M. Cacciari, M. L. Mangano, and P. Nason, “Gluon PDF constraints from the ratio of forward heavy-quark production at the LHC at and 13 TeV,” Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 610, arXiv:1507.06197 [hep-ph].
- (31) V. G. Kartvelishvili, A. K. Likhoded, and V. A. Petrov, “On the Fragmentation Functions of Heavy Quarks Into Hadrons,” Phys. Lett. 78B (1978) 615–617.
- (32) M. Cacciari, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, “A Study of heavy flavored meson fragmentation functions in annihilation,” JHEP 04 (2006) 006, arXiv:hep-ph/0510032 [hep-ph].
- (33) CHARM Collaboration, F. Bergsma et al., “Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,” Phys. Lett. 157B (1985) 458–462.
- (34) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., “Search for hidden-sector bosons in decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 161802, arXiv:1508.04094 [hep-ex].
- (35) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., “Search for long-lived scalar particles in decays,” Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 071101, arXiv:1612.07818 [hep-ex].
- (36) S. Gardner, R. J. Holt, and A. S. Tadepalli, “New Prospects in Fixed Target Searches for Dark Forces with the SeaQuest Experiment at Fermilab,” Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 115015, arXiv:1509.00050 [hep-ph].
- (37) C. Bird, P. Jackson, R. V. Kowalewski, and M. Pospelov, “Search for dark matter in transitions with missing energy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201803, arXiv:hep-ph/0401195 [hep-ph].
- (38) W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, “New strategies for New Physics search in , and decays,” JHEP 04 (2009) 022, arXiv:0902.0160 [hep-ph].
- (39) CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., “Searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7, 8, and 13 TeV,” JHEP 02 (2017) 135, arXiv:1610.09218 [hep-ex].
- (40) ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson using vector-boson fusion in collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 01 (2016) 172, arXiv:1508.07869 [hep-ex].
- (41) ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., “Search for an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates produced in association with a boson in collisions at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” arXiv:1708.09624 [hep-ex].
- (42) G. Krnjaic, “Probing Light Thermal Dark-Matter With a Higgs Portal Mediator,” Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 073009, arXiv:1512.04119 [hep-ph].
- (43) CRESST Collaboration, G. Angloher et al., “Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 25, arXiv:1509.01515 [astro-ph.CO].
- (44) SuperCDMS Collaboration, R. Agnese et al., “New Results from the Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with the CDMS Low Ionization Threshold Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 071301, arXiv:1509.02448 [astro-ph.CO].
- (45) LUX Collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al., “Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303, arXiv:1608.07648 [astro-ph.CO].
- (46) PICO Collaboration, C. Amole et al., “Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 CF Bubble Chamber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 251301, arXiv:1702.07666 [astro-ph.CO].
- (47) XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment,” arXiv:1705.06655 [astro-ph.CO].
- (48) PandaX-II Collaboration, X. Cui et al., “Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment,” arXiv:1708.06917 [astro-ph.CO].
- (49) ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].
- (50) CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].
- (51) Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13, arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO].
- (52) CMB-S4 Collaboration, K. N. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition,” arXiv:1610.02743 [astro-ph.CO].
- (53) M. Raggi and V. Kozhuharov, “Results and perspectives in dark photon physics,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 38 (2015) 449–505.