Critical Phenomena of Born-Infeld-de Sitter Black Holes in Cavities

Critical Phenomena of Born-Infeld-de Sitter Black Holes in Cavities

Fil Simovic, Robert B. Mann fil.simovic@gmail.com, rbmann@uwaterloo.ca Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics,
31 Caroline St. N.,Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Abstract

We examine the thermodynamic behaviour of charged, asymptotically de Sitter black holes embedded in a finite-radius isothermal cavity, with a Born-Infeld gauge field replacing the ordinary Maxwell field. We find that the non-linearities of Born-Infeld theory lead to the presence of reentrant phase transitions in the canonical ensemble, whose existence and character are determined by the maximal electric field strength of the theory. We also examine the phase structure in the grand canonical ensemble, and demonstrate the presence of a new reentrant phase transition from radiation, to an intermediate size black hole, and back to radiation.

Keywords:
de Sitter black holes, Born-Infeld electrodynamics, cavity, criticality, and reentrant phase transitions

1 Introduction

The study of asymptotically de Sitter black holes is relevant not only for understanding the properties of astrophysical black holes, but also in light of the recently formulated de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence (dS/CFT) strominger_ds/cft_2001 (); balasubramanian_mass_2002 (); ghezelbash_action_2002 (). These black holes present unique challenges that their anti-de Sitter (AdS) counterparts do not possess. For one, there is no Killing vector that is timelike everywhere outside the black hole horizon, preventing one from having a well defined asymptotic mass bousso_adventures_2002 (); clarkson_eguchi-hanson_2006 (); clarkson_entropic_2003 (); ashtekar_asymptotics_2015 (). The notion of a vacuum state is also problematic since the spacetime is essentially nonstationary mottola_particle_1985 (); allen_vacuum_1985 (); hartong_problems_nodate (), and there is no natural analog of the Bondi news to characterize gravitational radiation in the full non-linear context ashtekar_asymptotics_2015 ().

These considerations motivate a study of black hole thermodynamics in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes sekiwa_thermodynamics_2006 (); dolan_compressibility_2014 (); kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (). New issues arise due to the presence of a cosmological horizon, and the subject is presently not well understood. While a temperature can be ascribed to this horizon gibbons_cosmological_1977 (), it is not in general the same as the temperature of the black hole horizon, preventing the assignment of a single equilibrium temperature to the entire spacetime. Various proposals have been employed to address this issue, including the adoption of an effective temperature urano_mechanical_2009 () or by considering each horizon as a separate thermodynamic system sekiwa_thermodynamics_2006 (). Another possibility is to add scalar hair to the black hole in a manner that ensures equilibrium mbarek_reverse_2019 (); in this case a ‘reverse Hawking-Page transition’ is observed, in which the small black hole remains stable as it radiates (the cosmological horizon restoring the particle flux) unlike its well-known AdS counterpart hawking_thermodynamics_1983 ().

Another way of understanding the issue is that asymptotically de Sitter black hole lack a natural confining ‘box’ with which to achieve thermodynamic equilibrium. In anti-de Sitter space, this is accomplished by imposing reflecting boundary conditions at infinity, which is a timelike hypersurface that radiation can reach in a finite time. In asymptotically de Sitter spaces one cannot impose such boundary conditions, and we are forced to instead place restrictions on the timescales over which evaporation/thermalization processes occur in order to have a notion of at least quasi-static equilibrium. This approach is of course limited because small black holes shed their mass quickly.

One solution is to consider an ensemble where the temperature is specified at a finite boundary braden_charged_1990 (). This ‘isothermal cavity’ allows the black hole to come to a stable thermodynamic equilibrium, and has been used to understand the critical behaviour of charged de Sitter black holes both in the standard phase space carlip_phase_2003 (), as well as the extended phase space simovic_critical_2018-1 () (where the cosmological constant acts as a thermodynamic pressure kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 ()). In the former case a Hawking-Page-like phase transition in both the asymptotically flat and de Sitter cases is observed carlip_phase_2003 (). In the latter case, Van der Waals-type phase transitions between small and large black holes were exhibited, somewhat analogous to their AdS counterparts kubiznak_p-v_2012 (), but with a new structure emerging in phase space called a ‘swallowtube’ simovic_critical_2018-1 (): a compact region in the extended phase space outside of which no phase transitions are possible.

Our purpose here is to extend this study to non-linear Born-Infeld electrodynamics. In anti-de Sitter spacetime, this non-linearity introduces interesting new features beyond the Einstein-Maxwell case gunasekaran_extended_2012 (): the Gibbs free energy becomes discontinuous in a certain temperature range, indicating a new kind of phase transition between small and intermediate sized black holes. In this paper, we demonstrate that a similar type of phase transition occurs in de Sitter space with a cavity, as well as a reentrant smalllargesmall black hole phase transition. We find that the character of these phase transitions depends critically on the value of the maximal electric field strength in the Born-Infeld theory. We also examine the free energy in an ensemble where the potential is fixed, and find not only metastable reentrant phase transitions (where the radiation phase globally minimizes the free energy), but also a reentrant radiationblack holeradiation transition, the first time such a phase transition has been observed to our knowledge.

Our paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we briefly review black hole thermodynamics in the extended phase space, and discuss how the isothermal cavity is accounted for. In Section 3 we examine the thermodynamic properties of Born-Infeld-de Sitter black holes, including a discussion of the first law, the phase structure that arises, and an analysis of the vacuum polarization and metric function. Finally, in Section 4 we examine the free energy of charged de Sitter black holes both in the Maxwell and Born-Infeld theories in an ensemble where the potential is fixed, and discuss the phase behaviour present there.

2 The Action and Thermodynamic Quantities

Black hole phase transitions have provided us with important insights into quantum gravity in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence maldacena_large_1999 (). AdS/CFT relates a -dimensional gravitational theory in an asymptotically anti-de Sitter space to a -dimensional conformal field theory on the boundary of the spacetime. Through AdS/CFT, a wide variety of gravitational phenomena can be understood in terms of their CFT counterparts111For example, a Hawking-Page phase transition in the bulk is dual to a deconfinement transition in the boundary field theory., providing a powerful tool for investigating strongly coupled systems such as quark-gluon plasmas, condensed matter systems, and superfluids policastro_ads/cft_2002 ().

This has motivated further study into the thermodynamic phase structure of AdS black holes, where extensive effort has been devoted to understanding the extended phase space, in which the cosmological constant acts as a thermodynamic pressure kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (); kastor_enthalpy_2009 () via the identification

(1)

which can be achieved, for example, with a gauge 3-form potential creighton_quasilocal_1995 (). The variation of pressure further requires the presence of a conjugate volume term in the first law, which leads to a variety of novel thermodynamic behaviour kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (), including triple points altamirano_kerr-ads_2014 (), reentrant phase transitions altamirano_reentrant_2013 (), and the emergence of polymer-like dolan_compressibility_2014 (); frassino_multiple_2014 () and superfluid-like phase structures hennigar_superfluid_2017 (); hennigar_thermodynamics_2017 (); dykaar_hairy_2017 (), in addition to the now commonly observed Van der Waals transition kubiznak_p-v_2012 (). In de Sitter space, the cosmological constant is positive, so the variable is better thought of as a tension rather than a pressure. This introduces qualitatively new behaviour in the phase structure of a black hole, whose implications are the subject of recent exploration kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (); simovic_critical_2018-1 (); mbarek_reverse_2019 ().

For the purposes of this paper, the various thermodynamic quantities of interest are derived from the Euclidean action for the metric over a region with boundary . We are interested in Einstein-Born-Infeld theory in asymptotically de Sitter space, described by the following bulk action and boundary term:

(2)

is the Ricci scalar, is the cosmological constant (positive for de Sitter space), is the trace of the extrinsic curvature of the boundary, and is the Born-Infeld Lagrangian, given by:

(3)

Here, is the usual field strength tensor and is the Born-Infeld parameter, representing the maximal electromagnetic field strength in the theory, with the limit corresponding to Maxwell electrodynamics. can also be related to the string tension in string theory, where stretched open strings are created dynamically to suppress the electric field to this maximal value gibbons_aspects_2001 ().

We choose the subtraction term such that the action is normalized to when the mass (and therefore charge) of the black hole vanishes. This makes empty de Sitter space the reference point for the energy, in contrast to the work of Carlip and Vaidya carlip_phase_2003 (), where the boundary term is chosen so that the action vanishes for flat spacetime. As in Einstein-Maxwell-de Sitter gravity simovic_critical_2018-1 (), this choice does not change the qualitative behaviour of the critical phenomena, only the numerical values of various quantities and critical points. It is the more natural choice of reference since empty de Sitter space has the same asymptotics and topology near the boundary as Born-Infeld-de Sitter space.

For the Euclidean metric we take a spherically symmetric ansatz,

(4)

where is a compact radial coordinate with corresponding to the black hole horizon () and corresponding to the cavity wall (). The boundary at has topology with the having area . Heat flux through the cavity wall is fixed so that its temperature remains constant. The inverse temperature is related to the proper length of the boundary by , where the periodicity in imaginary time is . The details of how to arrive at various other thermodynamic quantities from the action have been summarized elsewhere braden_charged_1990 (); simovic_critical_2018-1 (). In this ensemble, the energy and entropy are given by

(5)

where is the reduced action. This energy is the mean thermal energy of the black hole with respect to empty de Sitter space, which can be related to the ADM mass of the spacetime after accounting for the gravitational and electrostatic binding energy.

With the energy, temperature and entropy in hand, we can construct the Helmholtz free energy, , which is the thermodynamic potential that is minimized when a system reaches equilibrium at constant temperature. Plotting for fixed pressure reveals whether any phase transitions occur in the system.

2.1 The First Law and Smarr Relation

The first law of thermodynamics for black holes in an asymptotically flat spacetime reads bardeen_four_1973 ()

(6)

where is the surface gravity of the black hole, is the horizon area, is the angular momentum, is the angular velocity, is the electrostatic potential, and is the electric charge. In the semi-classical regime, one can identify the surface gravity with the black hole temperature , and the area with the entropy associated with horizon degrees of freedom. This leads to the form

(7)

from which the extensive study of black hole thermodynamics emerges.

We will work in the extended phase space where the cosmological constant is treated as a thermodynamic pressure, with the identification given in (1) between (negative) pressure and (positive) . The quantity conjugate to is then interpreted as the thermodynamic volume:

(8)

This leads to an additional term in the first law corresponding to the variation in the pressure/volume. We must also include a work term associated with changes in the area of the isothermal cavity, whose conjugate is a surface tension/pressure . Finally, the mass parameter being a function of the Born-Infeld parameter allows us to define a new quantity gunasekaran_extended_2012 ()

(9)

known as the ‘Born-Infeld vacuum polarization’. This quantity has units of an electric polarization and is required for consistency of the first law and associated Smarr relation gunasekaran_extended_2012 ().

In the case of de Sitter black holes in a cavity, we must identify the energy (5) with the internal energy of the thermodynamic system in order for the first law (and Smarr relation) to be satisfied with the usual definitions of temperature, entropy, and pressure. The above considerations lead us to the following form of the first law

(10)

where the term has been omitted since we are considering non-rotating black holes only. The action determines the temperature , entropy , and energy of the system, while the thermodynamic volume, surface tension, and vacuum polarization are determined from the first law. Note that the thermodynamic volume will in general be different from the geometric volume of the black hole.

From the first law, one can also derive the Smarr relation, which in four dimensions is

(11)

and can be derived from various scaling arguments kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (); kastor_enthalpy_2009 (); smarr_mass_1973 (). This relation is broadly applicable as it holds for both asymptotically AdS and dS spacetimes, is valid in any dimension, and is also satisfied by more exotic objects like black rings and black branes kastor_enthalpy_2009 ().

3 Born-Infeld-de Sitter Black Holes

We now move to the discussion of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole. In Schwarzschild coordinates, the metric function takes the form

(12)

where is determined by the Hamiltonian constraint and is given by:

(13)

In these coordinates, the gauge field can be written

(14)

giving a finite radial electric field

(15)

where is the hypergeometric function. The ‘integral’ form of the metric function (16) is valid for all , , and ; it can also be written in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function as

(16)

where the series expansion of is convergent for , i.e. . The reduced action for this spacetime can then be determined:

(17)

The inverse temperature (and therefore temperature) is found by extremizing the action with respect to and solving for , giving

(18)

where we have defined

(19)
(20)

In the limit , this reduces to the Maxwell case simovic_critical_2018-1 (),

(21)

and taking further the limits , , and gives the familiar result for the asymptotically flat Schwarzschild black hole. The entropy is

(22)

and finally the energy is

(23)

One can check that in the limit these quantities reduce to those obtained in simovic_critical_2018-1 ().

3.1 The First Law

With the energy , temperature , and entropy as defined above, we can determine the thermodynamic volume , surface tension , and vacuum polarization from the first law. In order for (10) to hold, the surface tension must be

(24)

the thermodynamic volume is

(25)

the electric potential is

(26)

and the vacuum polarization is

(27)

With these definitions it is straightforward to verify that

(28)

where the sign of the term is negative in order to ensure that the thermodynamic volume is positive in the appropriate region.

Figure 1: Regions of positivity for the thermodynamic volume as a function of and with fixed cavity radius . Shaded regions indicate positivity. Left: Varying charge with . Right: Varying with .
Figure 2: Regions of positivity for the surface tension as a function of and with fixed cavity radius . Shaded regions indicate positivity, where should be regarded as a surface pressure. Left: Varying charge with . Right: Varying with .

Figure 1 shows regions in parameter space where is positive, in terms of the dimensionless ratio . These regions correspond to choices of parameters {, , , } which lead to a sensible notion of volume. We have implicitly restricted our analysis to regions where both and 222The cosmological horizon, , is located at the largest real root of ., the second restriction being necessary to avoid acausal influence of the isothermal cavity on the black hole. Outside the shaded regions one cannot interpret (25) as a volume in the traditional thermodynamic sense. One can see on the right side of Figure 1 that as becomes large, the volume behaves as it does in the Maxwell case, as expected. Figure 2 depicts regions where , which appears in the first law as a work term related to changes in the cavity size, is positive. Outside of the shaded regions (some of which overlap with regions) is negative, and thus better thought of as a surface tension. Within the shaded regions is positive, and so should be regarded as a surface pressure.

3.2 Vacuum Polarization and Metric

Born-Infeld theory has the feature that two distinct types of black hole solutions exist, depending on the values of and . This is demonstrated in Figure 3, where we plot the metric function (16) for fixed mass and varying , as well as fixed and varying mass. There is a marginal case (indicated in green) separating the two types of solutions, which occurs when attains a finite value at the origin. The condition for this to occur is

(29)

Spacetimes with are Schwarzschild-de Sitter-like, having a singularity at , a black hole horizon at , and a cosmological horizon at (beyond the cavity radius ). Spacetimes with are Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter-like (and approach this solution as ), with up to three distinct horizons: the inner horizon at , the outer black hole horizon at , and the cosmological horizon at . The small- behaviour is similar to that of the Born-Infeld-AdS case examined in gunasekaran_extended_2012 (). However the positive cosmological constant changes the large- behaviour; even though the cosmological horizon is ‘hidden’ behind the cavity, spacetime is still de Sitter-like up to the cavity radius.

Figure 3: The metric function as a function of for , , and ; the cavity radius is indicated by the red dashed line. Left: Fixed vacuum polarization () and varying mass parameter . Right: Fixed mass () and varying . In both figures the marginal case appears in green.
Figure 4: Behaviour of the vacuum polarization for , , and ; the cavity radius is indicated by the red dashed line. Left: as a function of for various . The red dots indicate the marginal mass along each line. Right: as a function of for fixed ( isotherms), with two branches.

The conjugate to the maximal electric field strength in the first law has units of polarization per unit volume, and is referred to as the Born-Infeld vacuum polarization. Its behaviour is shown in Figure 4. On the left, we see that for any , the vacuum polarization approaches zero as increases (corresponding to the Maxwell limit), and appears to reach a finite value at the origin. However we cannot draw conclusions about the small- behaviour since (3) restricts us to working in regions where . The red dots on each line mark where the marginal mass (29) is achieved; to the left of this dot the solution is Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter-like and to the right it is Schwarzschild-de Sitter-like.

Also of note is the fact that vanishes at for any value of , implying that the cavity itself does not support a vacuum polarization. Looking at the right diagram in Figure 4, we see that there are two branches of isotherms. The upper branch corresponds to a negative thermodynamic volume , while the lower branch has , so we take the lower branch to be the ‘physical’ one. In both branches the vacuum polarization approaches zero as we approach the Maxwell limit .

3.3 Helmholtz Free Energy and Phase Transitions

We now turn to the phase structure of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole. The quantity of interest is the Helmholtz free energy, , which is minimized by the equilibrium state of the system. Plotting as a function of for fixed (or ) will reveal the presence of any phase transitions in the system, generally indicated by discontinuities in the free energy. Using (18), (22), and (23) we have

(30)

where is understood to also depend on , , and , which are fixed. We plot parametrically using as the parameter. This is shown in Figures 5 and 6.

Figure 5: Helmholtz free energy of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole for fixed cavity size (), pressure (), and charge (). Left: . Right: .

There are a total of 4 distinct critical values of marking points where qualitative differences in the phase behaviour occur. We refer to these as {} and note that the exact values depend on , , and and must be found numerically. On the left of Figure 5, we see that for ‘small’ values of the maximal electric field strength (), the free energy resembles that of an uncharged AdS black hole, where a Hawking-Page phase transition normally occurs. In this case however, we have chosen an ensemble where the charge is fixed, so there can be no transition from a black hole to empty space, and only a large black hole exists above the minimum temperature indicated by the red line. To see a possible phase transition, we must plot the free energy at fixed potential, , which we do in Section 4. Above the critical value (in this case ) a kink forms in the free energy, which traces out an inverted swallowtail in space, similar to the one observed in gunasekaran_extended_2012 (). This is shown in the right-hand figure in Figure 5. However, for values of in the range () this kink does not intersect the lower large black hole branch, which still minimizes the free energy, and therefore does not indicate the presence of a phase transition.

Figure 6: Helmholtz free energy of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole for fixed cavity size (), pressure (), and charge (). On the left we have and on the right . The red dashed lines mark the temperature at which phase transitions occur.

In Figure 6, we see that when exceeds the second critical value (), a ‘star’ pattern characteristic of a reentrant phase transition forms. Examining the figure on the left, as the temperature increases the first dashed line corresponds to a zeroth-order largesmall black hole phase transition, whereas the second dashed line corresponds to the usual first-order smalllarge transition. When (as in the right side of Figure 6), the small black hole branch always has lower free energy than the upper large black hole branch, so the first phase transition is washed out and only the smalllarge black hole transition at the second dashed line remains. Finally, when is above the fourth critical value , the phase structure of a charged Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole emerges, as expected since the limit corresponds to the usual Einstein-Maxwell action. Indeed in this limit we recover all of the phenomena and qualitative behaviour seen in previous work simovic_critical_2018-1 (), with only small quantitative changes to the various critical values when is very large but finite. To summarize, there are five regions separated by four critical values of :

 : No phase transitions. Large black hole phase globally minimizes .
 : No phase transitions. Unstable inverted swallowtail region forms.
 : Reentrant phase transition from largesmalllarge black hole.
 : Phase transition from smalllarge black hole, with a minimum temperature.
 : Phase transition from smalllarge black hole, with no minimum temperature.

In the Maxwell case examined in simovic_critical_2018-1 (), we demonstrated the presence of a unique ‘swallowtube’ structure in phase space which results from the presence of the isothermal cavity. This tube represented a compact region in phase space where a small/large black hole phase transition occurs, the pressure being bounded by an upper and lower critical value outside of which the phase transition disappears. A similar, albeit more complicated structure appears when Born-Infeld electrodynamics is introduced. For large values of we recover the swallowtube seen in simovic_critical_2018-1 (), with a slightly modified shape (the identical shape being achieved in the limit ). However once falls below a critical value, the shape of this tube qualitatively changes, such that each constant-pressure slice resembles one of the two cases shown in Figure 6. Depending on the exact choice of parameters, these slices may contain a reentrant phase transition (as in Figure 6a), or a regular smalllarge transition (as in Figure 6b), and always have the property that there are no black holes with , unlike in the Maxwell case where black holes exist down to . This difference is shown in Figure 7, with the tube structure being represented as a series of constant pressure slices in space. Furthermore, for any choice of , , and where a reentrant phase transition is present in one of the slices, the tube terminates at . If there is no reentrant phase transition, one can always choose parameters such that the tube pinches off at a non-zero pressure as it does in the Maxwell case. Note finally that if is small enough, then for no choice of , , and is the swallowtube present.

Figure 7: Helmholtz free energy of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole for , , showing slices of fixed . The red dots mark the smalllarge phase transition on each slice. The red line is the coexistence curve. Left: . A reentrant phase transition is present on the slices indicated with the black arrows. These slices resemble Figure 6a. The remaining slices resemble Figure 6b. Right: . There are no reentrant phase transitions present. Note the difference in small- behaviour between the two figures: on the left, there is a minimum temperature at which the black hole phase exists, while on the right there is no minimum temperature (the lines extend to ).

Working in the extended phase space also allows us to determine the equation of state for these Born-Infeld-de Sitter black holes. This is a relationship between the pressure , temperature , and volume (the thermodynamic volume divided by the number of degrees of horizon degrees of freedom) kubiznak_thermodynamics_2016 (). In AdS space the volume and the specific volume (the volume per horizon degrees of freedom) kubiznak_p-v_2012 (). However in dS space, (18) means that the pressure is a non-linear function of , and (25) in turn implies that is a highly non-linear function of . As a result, the equation of state cannot be expressed in closed form. We can plot at fixed numerically; however doing so shows an absence of the oscillations characteristic of the van der Waals fluid. We omit the plot here for lack of insight. These oscillations are present in the Born-Infeld-AdS case examined in gunasekaran_extended_2012 (); it remains to be determined whether the analogy with van der Waals fluids in the extended phase space breaks down because of the presence of the cavity, or due to the fact that we are working in asymptotically de Sitter spacetime.

4 Free Energy at Fixed Potential

As noted above, we should not expect to see a Hawking-Page-like phase transition when examining the free energy as defined by (30). This is because the ensemble considered there is one where the total charge is fixed. However, a black hole cannot dissolve into pure radiation and conserve charge at the same time. Instead, one must consider what happens when the potential is fixed at infinity while the charge is allowed to vary. With these boundary conditions the free energy becomes . We examine first the case where , corresponding to the Maxwell limit, followed by the Born-Infeld case.

4.1 Maxwell Theory

In the Maxwell limit, the free energy at fixed potential written as a function of , , , and is:

(31)
Figure 8: Free energy at fixed potential, with , . The temperatures at which phase transitions occur are indicated by the red dashed lines. The cavity radius is indicated by a red dot. Left: The Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter black hole, with varying . Right: The Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole with for .

We plot (4.1) as a function of temperature for fixed , , , and in Figure 8, along with the free energy of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole for large . Examining the figure on the left, as one follows the branches from (where they overlap) the black hole increases in size towards the maximal value , which is achieved at the red dots. The yellow line in Figure 8a represents a reentrant phase transition, with a smalllarge transition occurring at the leftmost red line, followed by a largesmall transition at the second line. For values of above a certain critical value , the branches no longer intersect (as in the green case), and the small black hole globally minimizes the free energy for all temperatures. This value depends on the choice of , , and and must be found numerically. Below (as in the blue curve) there is only a smalllarge transition, as the free energy terminates at before intersecting the small black hole branch again. Critically, these transitions are all metastable, as the free energy is in all cases above the line corresponding to the radiation phase.

4.2 Born-Infeld Theory

In the Born-Infeld case, the free energy at fixed potential is:

(32)
Figure 9: Free energy of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole at fixed potential. Left: , , and varying . The temperatures at which phase transitions occur are indicated by the red dashed lines. The cavity radius is indicated by a red dot. Right: Fixed , , and varying .

Figure 9 displays the free energy (4.2) of the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole at fixed potential. On the left, we plot for fixed and varying . Just like in the Maxwell case, there is a critical value of for which the large black hole branch begins to intersect the small branch (as in the blue line) and gives rise to a (metastable) reentrant smalllargesmall phase transition. The exact value of at which this occurs again depends on the value of , and , and must be found numerically. In the given example, this occurs at approximately . We emphasize again that the radiation phase globally minimizes the free energy here. For comparison, we plot the same free energy for the Born-Infeld-de Sitter black hole for and on the right side of Figure 8, demonstrating that for large enough values of the two cases are identical.

On the right of Figure 9, we plot for fixed and varying . Here we see that a true reentrant phase transition emerges within a small range of values for the maximal electric field strength . In the given example, for the large black hole branch crosses the line, giving rise to a reentrant phase transition from radiation to a n intermediate black hole, and back to radiation as the temperature increases. The thermodynamically stable state is pure radiation at both small and large temperatures, with a charged black hole as the stable state at intermediate values. Above , the cavity radius is reached before the large black hole branch crosses the line, and we have a zeroth order phase transition from a large size black hole to radiation. To our knowledge this is the first time these particular types of reentrant phase transitions from black holes to radiation have been observed. The fact that a black hole exists within an intermediate temperature range while radiation is the preferred state at both low and high temperatures is a curiosity that is so far only seen when an isothermal cavity and Born-Infeld gauge field are present.

5 Conclusions

The introduction of an isothermal cavity as an equilibrating mechanism allows for the study of a wealth of thermodynamic phenomena in various asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes. We have shown that Born-Infeld-de Sitter spacetimes admit interesting new phase structures that are not present in either traditional Maxwell theories or in asymptotically AdS spacetimes, namely the existence of a tube-like structure in space analogous to the swallowtail typically seen in AdS spacetimes, but which is compact in the sense that there is an upper and lower bound of pressures for which a small/large black hole phase transition occurs. In the Maxwell case studied in simovic_critical_2018-1 (), this swallowtube represented a series of first-order smalllarge black hole phase transitions. The non-linearities of Born-Infeld theory significantly alter this structure, so that each slice of the tube instead represents a reentrant phase transition when is small enough. Notable is the fact that the boundedness of the electric field strength means that the swallowtube is cut off at for a wide range of values for and (i.e. the phase transition survives in the limit). This is in contrast to the Maxwell case where the tube pinches off at both ends at non-zero pressure, and the phase transition disappears as .

We have also observed for the first time reentrant phase transitions between charged black holes and pure radiation in the Gibbs ensemble where the potential is fixed. We find that for a certain range of , Born-Infeld black holes are stable at intermediate values of the temperature, provided the parameter is in an intermediate range of values. Otherwise either cold radiation or hot radiation is the more stable state.

Finally, we note that the isothermal cavity necessarily introduces non-linearities in the equation of state that prevent the oscillations associated with Van der Waals-like phase transitions (typically seen in asymptotically AdS spacetimes) from occurring. This was seen in simovic_critical_2018-1 () in the Einstein-Maxwell case, and remains true even with the inclusion of Born-Infeld electrodynamics. It seems that the equilibrating mechanism (isothermal cavity in dS vs. reflecting boundary conditions in AdS) plays a larger role in determining the nature of the equation of state than does the inclusion of field non-linearity, though it remains to be seen if this is still true in higher dimensions or once angular momentum is considered. Future work will focus on answering this question, as well as mapping out the parameter space further to enlarge our understanding of de Sitter black hole thermodynamics.

6 Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada.

References

  • (1) A. Strominger, “The dS/CFT correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2001, pp. 034–034, Oct. 2001.
  • (2) V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, and D. Minic, “Mass, Entropy and Holography in Asymptotically de Sitter Spaces,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, p. 123508, June 2002. arXiv: hep-th/0110108.
  • (3) A. M. Ghezelbash and R. B. Mann, “Action, Mass and Entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes and the de Sitter/CFT Correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, pp. 005–005, Jan. 2002. arXiv: hep-th/0111217.
  • (4) R. Bousso, “Adventures in de Sitter space,” arXiv:hep-th/0205177, May 2002. arXiv: hep-th/0205177.
  • (5) R. Clarkson and R. B. Mann, “Eguchi-Hanson Solitons in Odd Dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, pp. 1507–1523, Mar. 2006. arXiv: hep-th/0508200.
  • (6) R. Clarkson, A. M. Ghezelbash, and R. B. Mann, “Entropic N-bound and Maximal Mass Conjecture Violations in Four Dimensional Taub-Bolt(NUT)-dS Spacetimes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 674, pp. 329–364, Dec. 2003. arXiv: hep-th/0307059.
  • (7) A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga, and A. Kesavan, “Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant: I. Basic framework,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, p. 025004, Jan. 2015. arXiv: 1409.3816.
  • (8) E. Mottola, “Particle creation in de Sitter space,” Physical Review D, vol. 31, pp. 754–766, Feb. 1985.
  • (9) B. Allen, “Vacuum states in de Sitter space,” Physical Review D, vol. 32, pp. 3136–3149, Dec. 1985.
  • (10) J. Hartong, “On problems in de Sitter spacetime physics: scalar fields, black holes and stability,”
  • (11) Y. Sekiwa, “Thermodynamics of de Sitter black holes: Thermal cosmological constant,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, p. 084009, Apr. 2006.
  • (12) B. P. Dolan, “The compressibility of rotating black holes in D-dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 31, p. 035022, Feb. 2014.
  • (13) D. Kubiznak and F. Simovic, “Thermodynamics of horizons: de Sitter black holes and reentrant phase transitions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 33, p. 245001, Dec. 2016. arXiv: 1507.08630.
  • (14) G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,” Physical Review D, vol. 15, pp. 2738–2751, May 1977.
  • (15) M. Urano, A. Tomimatsu, and H. Saida, “The mechanical first law of black hole spacetimes with a cosmological constant and its application to the Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, p. 105010, May 2009.
  • (16) S. Mbarek and R. B. Mann, “Reverse Hawking-Page Phase Transition in de Sitter Black Holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2019, p. 103, Feb. 2019. arXiv: 1808.03349.
  • (17) S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 87, pp. 577–588, Dec. 1983.
  • (18) H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting, and J. W. York, “Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble,” Physical Review D, vol. 42, pp. 3376–3385, Nov. 1990.
  • (19) S. Carlip and S. Vaidya, “Phase transitions and critical behaviour for charged black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, pp. 3827–3837, Aug. 2003.
  • (20) F. Simovic and R. B. Mann, “Critical Phenomena of Charged de Sitter Black Holes in Cavities,” arXiv:1807.11875 [gr-qc], July 2018. arXiv: 1807.11875.
  • (21) D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, “P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, p. 33, July 2012. arXiv: 1205.0559.
  • (22) S. Gunasekaran, D. Kubiznak, and R. B. Mann, “Extended phase space thermodynamics for charged and rotating black holes and Born-Infeld vacuum polarization,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, p. 110, Nov. 2012. arXiv: 1208.6251.
  • (23) J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1113–1133, 1999. arXiv: hep-th/9711200.
  • (24) G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, pp. 043–043, Sept. 2002. arXiv: hep-th/0205052.
  • (25) D. Kastor, S. Ray, and J. Traschen, “Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, p. 195011, Oct. 2009. arXiv: 0904.2765.
  • (26) J. Creighton and R. B. Mann, “Quasilocal Thermodynamics of Dilaton Gravity coupled to Gauge Fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, pp. 4569–4587, Oct. 1995. arXiv: gr-qc/9505007.
  • (27) N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and Z. Sherkatghanad, “Kerr-AdS analogue of triple point and solid/liquid/gas phase transition,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 31, p. 042001, Feb. 2014. arXiv: 1308.2672.
  • (28) N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak, and R. B. Mann, “Reentrant Phase Transitions in Rotating AdS Black Holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, p. 101502, Nov. 2013. arXiv: 1306.5756.
  • (29) A. M. Frassino, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and F. Simovic, “Multiple Reentrant Phase Transitions and Triple Points in Lovelock Thermodynamics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, p. 80, Sept. 2014. arXiv: 1406.7015.
  • (30) R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, and E. Tjoa, “Superfluid Black Holes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, p. 021301, Jan. 2017. arXiv: 1609.02564.
  • (31) R. A. Hennigar, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, “Thermodynamics of hairy black holes in Lovelock gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, p. 70, Feb. 2017. arXiv: 1612.06852.
  • (32) H. Dykaar, R. A. Hennigar, and R. B. Mann, “Hairy black holes in cubic quasi-topological gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, p. 45, May 2017. arXiv: 1703.01633.
  • (33) G. W. Gibbons, “Aspects of Born-Infeld Theory and String/M-Theory,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 589, pp. 324–350, 2001. arXiv: hep-th/0106059.
  • (34) J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The four laws of black hole mechanics,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 31, pp. 161–170, June 1973.
  • (35) L. Smarr, “Mass Formula for Kerr Black Holes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 30, pp. 71–73, Jan. 1973.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
373047
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description