CP violation in charm and beauty decays at LHCb

# Cp violation in charm and beauty decays at LHCb

M. Pepe Altarelli111On behalf of the LHCb collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
###### Abstract

LHCb is a dedicated heavy flavour physics precision experiment at the LHC searching for New Physics (NP) beyond the Standard Model (SM) through the study of very rare decays of beauty and charm-flavoured hadrons and precision measurements of -violating observables. In this review I will present a selection of recent precision measurements of -violating observables in the decays of beauty and charm-flavoured hadrons. These measurements are based on an integrated luminosity of up to collected by LHCb in 2011.

###### keywords:
LHCb, Flavour physics, CP violation

## 1 Introduction

The LHCb detector has been taking data with high efficiency during the last three years of operation at the LHC, producing a wealth of exciting physics results, which have made an impact on the flavour physics landscape and proved the concept of a dedicated heavy flavour spectrometer in the forward region at a hadron collider.

The LHC is the world’s most intense source of hadrons. The  cross-section in proton-proton collisions at  TeV is measured to be b, implying that more than  pairs were produced in LHCb in 2011, when an integrated luminosity of was collected. The  cross-section is about 20 times larger than the  cross-section, giving LHCb great potential in charm physics studies. As in the case of the Tevatron, a complete spectrum of hadrons is available, including ,  mesons and baryons, such as .

At the nominal LHC design luminosity of  cm s, multiple collisions within the same bunch crossing (so-called pile-up) would significantly complicate the decay-vertex reconstruction and flavour tagging, and increase the combinatorial background. For this reason the detector was designed to operate at a reduced luminosity. The luminosity at LHCb is locally controlled by transverse displacement of the beams (so-called “levelling”) to yield (approximately a factor of two above the original LHCb design value) at which the average event pile-up per visible crossing is 2. Running at relatively low luminosity has the additional advantage of reducing detector occupancy in the tracking systems and limiting radiation damage effects.

The dominant -production mechanism at the LHC is through gluon-gluon fusion in which the momenta of the incoming partons are strongly asymmetric in the centre-of-mass frame. As a consequence, the  pair is boosted along the direction of the higher momentum gluon, and both hadrons are produced in the same forward (or backward) direction in the centre-of-mass frame. The detector is therefore designed as a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidity range , which ensures a high geometric efficiency for detecting all the decay particles from one hadron together with decay products from the accompanying hadron to be used as a flavour tag. The key detector features are a versatile trigger scheme efficient for both leptonic and hadronic final states, which is able to cope with a variety of modes with small branching fractions; excellent vertex and proper time resolution; precise particle identification, specifically for hadron () separation; precise invariant mass reconstruction to reject background efficiently. A full description of the detector characteristics can be found in Ref.ref:det ().

In this review, I report on a few recent precision measurements of -violating observables in decays of beauty and charm-flavoured hadrons, while the study of rare decays at LHCb is covered by a separate contribution ref:Johannes ().

## 2 Measurement of the Bs mixing phase

The -violating phase between - mixing and the decay amplitude of the  meson is determined with a flavour tagged, angular analysis of the decay , with and . This phase originates from the interference between the amplitudes for a  () to decay directly into the final state or to first mix into  () and then decay. In the SM, is predicted to be , where  rad ref:lenz (). However, NP could significantly modify this prediction if new particles contribute to the - box diagram.

The CDF and D0 collaborations ref:CDFphis (); ref:D0phis () have reported measurements of the  mixing phase based on approximately 11,000  candidates from an integrated luminosity of (i.e. the full CDF Run II dataset) and 6,500  candidates from , respectively. Both results are compatible with the SM expectation at approximately one standard deviation in the () plane.

LHCb has presented results based on a sample that contains approximately 21,200  candidates from an integrated luminosity of  ref:LHCbphis (). Besides having a very large and clean signal yield, LHCb also benefits from an excellent proper time resolution to resolve fast  oscillations, which is measured to be 45 fs, compared to a  oscillation period of 350 fs. The other key experimental ingredient is flavour tagging, which is performed by reconstructing the charge of the -hadron accompanying the meson under study. The analysis uses an opposite-side flavour tagger based on four different signatures, namely high muons, electrons and kaons, and the net charge of an inclusively reconstructed secondary vertex, with a combined effective tagging power of 2.4%. The decay  is a pseudoscalar to vector-vector transition. Total angular momentum conservation implies and therefore the final state is a mixture of -even () and -odd () eigenstates, which can be disentangled on a statistical basis. This is accomplished by performing an unbinned maximum likelihood fit to the candidate invariant mass, decay time, initial  flavour and the decay angles in the so-called transversity frame ref:trans (). The fit yields the following result for the three main observables, namely , the decay width, , and the decay width difference between the light and heavy  mass eigenstates,

 ϕs =−0.001 ± 0.101(stat) ± 0.027(syst) rad, Γs =0.6580 ± 0.0054(stat) ± 0.0066(syst) ps−1, ΔΓs =0.116 ± 0.018(stat) ± 0.006(syst) ps−1.

This is the world’s most precise measurement of and the first direct observation for a non-zero value for . These results are fully consistent with the SM, indicating that violation in the  system is small. Actually, there exists a second mirror solution in the plane vs , which arises from the fact that the time-dependent differential decay rates are invariant under the transformation (plus an appropriate transformation of the strong phases). LHCb has recently resolved this ambiguity ref:ambig () by studying the dependence of the strong phase difference between the -wave and -wave amplitudes on the mass from  decays in the region around the resonance. The solution with positive is favoured with a significance of 4.7 standard deviations, indicating that in the  system the lighter mass eigenstate that is almost even decays faster than the state that is almost odd.

The mixing-induced phase is also measured in the decay  ref:Bs2Jpsipipi (). The branching fraction for this decay is of , with . However, this final state has been shown to be almost pure with a -odd fraction larger than 0.977 at 95% CL, and there is no need for an angular analysis. About 7,400 signal events are selected in of data, yielding the result  rad. The two datasets are combined in a simultaneous fit, leading to the preliminary result  rad ref:LHCbphis (), in excellent agreement with the SM. The precision for this result is completely dominated by the statistical uncertainty and therefore significant improvements are expected with more data.

Figure 1 shows 68% confidence-level contours in the plane for the individual experimental measurements, their combined contour, as well as the SM predictions ref:HFAG (). The combined result is consistent with these predictions at the 0.14  level.

## 3 Measurement of the weak phase γ from tree-level decays

The angle is currently the least precisely known parameter of the CKM unitarity triangle. The direct determination of via fits to the experimental data gives  ref:CKM () or  ref:UTFIT (), depending on whether a frequentist or Bayesian treatment is used. In terms of the elements of the CKM matrix, this weak phase is defined as . It is of particular interest as it can produce direct violation in tree-level decays involving the interference between and transitions that are expected to be insensitive to NP contributions, thus providing a benchmark against which measurements sensitive to NP through loop processes can be compared.

One of the most powerful ways to measure the angle is through charged decays to open charm, , where stands for a or a and indicates either a pion or kaon. Decays in which the hadron is a kaon carry greater sensitivity to . The method is based on two key observations: 1. These decays can produce neutral mesons of both flavours via colour-favoured or colour-suppressed decays 2. Neutral and mesons can decay to a common final state, for example through Cabibbo-favoured or doubly Cabibbo-suppressed Feynman diagrams (ADS method ref:ADS ()) or through decays to eigenstates such as or (GLW method ref:GLW ()). In the ADS case, the reversed suppression between and decays results in very similar amplitudes leading to a high sensitivity to . The relative phase between the two interfering amplitudes for and is the sum of the strong and weak interaction phases, while in the case of and it is the difference between the strong phase and . Therefore both phases can be extracted by measuring the two charge conjugate modes. In addition, there is a dependence on the ratio between the magnitude of the suppressed amplitude and the favoured amplitude .

LHCb has performed an analysis of the two-body modes in which the considered meson final states are , , the Cabibbo-favoured and the Cabibbo-suppressed  ref:BtoDh (). For both GLW and ADS methods the observables of interest are asymmetries and partial widths. Exploiting of data, the first observation of the suppressed ADS mode was performed. This is illustrated in the top plots of Fig 2. A large asymmetry is visible in the mode (by comparing the signal yield for and ) while for the ADS mode there is the hint of an (opposite) asymmetry. By combining all the various modes violation in was observed with a significance.

The three-body final state , with ), was also studied ref:GGSZ () through a Dalitz plot analysis. The strategy relies on comparing the distributions of events in the Dalitz plot for and decays. Existing measurements of the CLEO-c experiment ref:CLEO-c () were used to provide input on the decay strong-phase parameters. Based on approximately 800 decays with selected from of data, the following results were obtained for the weak phase and the ratio between the suppressed and favoured decay amplitudes, , with a second solution at , and .

Other flavour specific final states, such as are exploited in a similar manner to the two-body case ref:ADS4body (). However, for multi-body final states different intermediate resonances can contribute, diluting violation effects. Based on of data, the suppressed ADS modes and were observed for the first time with significances of and , respectively.

A combination of the results from Refs. ref:BtoDh (); ref:GGSZ (); ref:ADS4body () was performed to derive an unambiguous best-fit value in of  ref:gamma_comb (), suggesting very good prospects for the result based on the full data-set. Additional -sensitive measurements will also be included in the future. With the data currently available on tape, LHCb should be able to reduce the error quoted above by at least a factor of two.

## 4 Cp violation in charmless B decays

Charmless decays represent an interesting family of channels for which a precise measurement of the charge or time-dependent asymmetries can play an important role in the search for NP. In particular, NP may show up as virtual contributions of new particles in loop diagrams. A comparison of results from decays dominated by tree-level diagrams with those that start at loop level can probe the validity of the SM. In particular, it was pointed out by Fleischer ref:fleischer () that -spin related decays (obtained by interchanging and quarks) of the type , with , offer interesting strategies for the measurement of the angle : in presence of NP in the penguin loops, such a determination could differ appreciably from that derived from decays governed by pure tree amplitudes discussed in Sect. 3.

LHCb has analysed very large samples of decays, separating the final state pions and kaons by using the particle identification provided by the RICH detectors. Figure 3 shows the invariant mass spectra for events based on an integrated luminosity of  ref:B2hh_int (). The selection cuts are optimised for the best sensitivity to ) (plots a and b) and ) (plots c and d), where the asymmetry in the decay rate to the final state is defined as . LHCb reported ref:B2hh_int () the most precise measurement for available to date, with a significance exceeding 6 , as well as the first evidence, at the 3.3  level, for violation in the decay of the mesons. The effect of the asymmetry is visible in Fig. 3 by comparing the yields for the in (a) and (b) and those for the in (c) and (d).

The asymmetry results need to be corrected for the effect of a possible production asymmetry, which is studied by reconstructing a sample of decays, given that violation in transitions is expected to be small. Effects related to the instrumental detection efficiencies are evaluated by using data sets with opposite magnet polarities and reconstructing large samples of tagged and decays, as well as untagged decays. These corrections are found to be small.

LHCb has also performed measurements of time-dependent violation in charmless two-body decays by studying the processes and  ref:B2hh_time (). The analysis is based on a luminosity of . Direct and mixing-induced asymmetries are measured in each channel using a tagged, time-dependent analysis. This analysis is performed for the first time at a hadron collider, and the decay is studied for the first time ever. The preliminary results for the channel are in agreement with the world average from the factories. However, more data need to be analysed to be able to extract a measurement of from these decays.

## 5 Cp violation in charm

The charm sector is an interesting place to probe for the presence of NP because violation is expected to be small in the SM. In particular, in singly Cabibbo suppressed decays, such as or , NP could manifest itself through the interference between tree-level and penguin diagrams. LHCb has collected very large samples of charm: one in every ten LHC interaction results in the production of a charm hadron, of which 1-2 kHz are written to storage and are available for offline analysis. In 2012, LHCb has collected approximately tagged and untagged decays per pb of integrated luminosity and it has the world’s largest sample of two and three-body decays on tape.

The difference in time-integrated asymmetries between and was measured using of data collected in 2011 ref:delta_A_CP (). The flavour of the charm meson is determined by requiring a decay, with or , in which the sign of the slow pion tags the initial or . By taking the difference of the measured time-integrated asymmetries for and , effects related to the production asymmetry and to the detection asymmetry of the slow pion and meson in the final state cancel to first order, so that one can derive the difference of the asymmetries, . Second-order effects are minimised by performing the analysis in bins of the relevant kinematic variables. A nice additional advantage of taking this difference is that in the U-spin limit for any direct violation ref:implications (), so that the effect is amplified. The final result is

 ΔACP=[−0.82±0.21(stat)±0.11(syst)]%. (1)

This result (subsequently confirmed by CDF ref:CDF_delta_A_CP ()) has generated a great deal of theoretical interest, as it is the first evidence for violation in the charm sector, with a significance of .

The difference in time-integrated asymmetries can be written to first order as

where is the asymmetry arising from direct violation in the decay, the average decay time of the in the reconstructed sample, and the asymmetry from violation in the mixing. In presence of a different time acceptance for the and final states, a contribution from indirect violation remains.

Figure 4 shows the HFAG world-average combination ref:HFAG_Delta_ACP () in the plane (). The combined data is consistent with no violation at 0.002% CL.

LHCb is currently completing the analysis of the full 2011 data sample and pursuing alternative strategies to verify the effect. In particular, an analysis is being finalised in which the flavour of the meson is tagged using the charge of the muon in semileptonic decays; furthermore violation is searched for in charged decays where there is no possibility of indirect violation and a positive signal would indicate unambiguously the presence of direct violation.

## 6 Conclusion

This contribution has reviewed measurements of violation in charm and beauty decays performed by LHCb using up to of data collected in 2011. In the system LHCb has obtained the world’s most precise measurement of the mixing phase and the first direct observation for a non-zero value for . Important milestones have been reached in the measurement of the weak phase both from decays at tree level and from those where new physics could contribute through loops. The large charm production cross-section at the LHC has allowed for a dramatic improvement in sensitivity to violating effects. During the 2012 run at  TeV, another of data were collected, which will allow LHCb to increase the precision on the results presented here and pursue new analyses to understand precisely the nature of violation in charm and beauty and hopefully find signs of new physics.

## Acknowledgement

I would like to thank the organisers of Capri 2012 for their kind invitation to such a nice and fruitful meeting on a truly splendid island, my LHCb colleagues for providing the material discussed here and, in particular, Tim Gershon and Vava Gligorov for their careful reading of this article.

## References

You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters