Coherent transfer between low-angular momentum and circular Rydberg states

Coherent transfer between low-angular momentum and circular Rydberg states

A. Signoles [ Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Collège de France, CNRS, ENS-PSL Research University, UPMC-Sorbonne Universités, 11, place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    E.K. Dietsche    A. Facon    D. Grosso    S. Haroche    J.M. Raimond    M. Brune    S. Gleyzes Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Collège de France, CNRS, ENS-PSL Research University, UPMC-Sorbonne Universités, 11, place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
July 17, 2019

We realize a coherent transfer between a laser-accessible low-angular-momentum Rydberg state and the circular Rydberg level with maximal angular momentum. This transfer is induced by a radiofrequency field with a high-purity polarization tuned at resonance on Stark transitions inside the hydrogenic Rydberg manifold. We observe over a few microseconds more than twenty coherent Rabi oscillations between the initial Rydberg state and the circular Rydberg level. We characterize in details these complex oscillations involving many Rydberg levels and find them to be in perfect agreement with a simple theoretical model. This coherent transfer procedure opens the way to hybrid quantum gates bridging the gap between optical communication and quantum information manipulations based on microwave Cavity and Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics.

Present address: ]Physikalisches Institüt, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

The long-lived Circular Rydberg Levels (CRLs) are ideal tools for quantum manipulation of microwave (mw) fields stored in ultra-high-Q 3D superconducting resonators. They led to early demonstrations of basic quantum information processing operations Raimond2001a () and to the generation of non-classical field state superpositions Brune1996 (). More recently, they have been instrumental in the exploration of fundamental Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (Cavity-QED) effects, such as QND measurements of the photon number Guerlin2007 () and quantum feedback Sayrin2011 (). Recent advances on the manipulation of Rydberg atoms near atom chips Teixeira2015 () indicate that they could also be interfaced with the resonant structures used in the flourishing field of Circuit-QED Hogan2012 (); Devoret2013 ().

However, the photons used in mw Cavity- and Circuit-QED are unable to propagate over long-range transmission lines Wang2011 (). Optical to mw interfaces are thus the focus of an intense activity Maxwell2014 (); Andrews2014 (). A new realm for mw quantum information manipulation would open if the CRLs could be coherently interfaced with optical photons, which are ideal quantum information carriers over fiber and free-space communication networks Cirac2017 (). Unfortunately, the CRLs, with their large orbital quantum number ( is the principal quantum number), do not couple directly to optical photons.

In contrast, low-angular momentum Rydberg states are accessible from the ground state by coherent laser excitation Johnson2008 (); Reetz2008 (); Miroshnychenko2010 (). They were recently used for optical quantum information processing operations such as photon-photon gates relying on single-photon optical non-linearities induced by the dipole blockade mechanism Peyronel2012 (); Parigi2012 (); Baur2014 (); Paredes2014 (). They could also lead to quantum gates entangling a mw photon with a collective hyperfine excitation in a ground state atomic ensemble Pritchard2014 () and hence, through the DLCZ protocol Duan2001 (), to gates entangling optical and mw photons. However, the short lifetime of these levels, of the order of 100 s, sets limits on the quantum transfer fidelity and on their use in CQED experiments.

The missing link between mw and optical photons is a fast coherent transfer from a laser-accessible low- state to the CRLs. The most efficient CRL preparation technique so far involves a series of radiofrequency (rf) transitions between Stark levels performed in an rapid adiabatic passage Hulet1983 (); Nussenzveig1993 (). It thus requires a relatively long time, much longer than the typical Rabi frequency on the rf transitions. Therefore, the adiabatic rapid passage results in the accumulation of large dynamic phases. Their unavoidable experimental fluctuations affect the coherence of the process. The crossed fields CRLs preparation technique Delande1988 (); Hare1988 (), also based on an adiabatic passage, suffers from similar limitations.

In this Letter we demonstrate a fast, coherent transfer between a low- state and the CRL. By coupling a Rydberg atom to a rf field with a well-defined polarization, we isolate in the Stark manifold with the principal quantum number , a subset of states behaving as a large angular momentum . We resonantly drive this angular momentum and observe more than 20 coherent Rabi oscillations between the lowest (low-) and uppermost (circular) energy states.

Figure 1: (color online) (a) Scheme of the Hydrogen Rydberg levels in the -th manifold in the presence of a static electric field (only states with are shown). A driving field couples all the levels (in red) from to the CRL. (b) Scheme of Rb Rydberg levels. A electric field lifts the degeneracy of the -th Stark manifold. States with are hydrogenoid while lower levels are affected by quantum defects. The ground state atoms are excited to the lower state of the manifold. A polarized rf field couples to an angular momentum-like subspace (red levels) via transitions, leading to a transfer toward the CRL (blue arrow). The population of each Stark level can be probed by selective mw transitions towards corresponding level in the manifold (dotted arrow). (c) Simplified experimental setup. Atoms from a thermal beam are optically excited at the center of the structure by laser beams (red: 780 nm and 776 nm lasers and green : 1258 nm laser). A set of electrodes is used to apply static and rf electric fields. After a time-of-flight the atoms are detected outside the structure by field ionization.

The experiment is performed on Rb atoms in a static electric field , which partly lifts the degeneracy of the Rydberg manifold. Its levels can be sorted by their magnetic quantum number (restricted to positive values here) Gallagher1994 (). For a Hydrogen atom (see Fig. 1a), the Stark eigenstates are the parabolic states , where labels the states with the same from bottom to top in a regularly spaced ladder. The lowest level of each ladder () is midway between the lowest ones in the ladder. The rf transitions between these lowest levels are thus all at the same angular frequency  Bethe1977 () (: elementary charge, : Bohr radius; MHz for V/cm and ). A rf field couples all the states from up to the CRL. The subspace spanned by these levels is that of an angular momentum , with  Lutwak1997 (). In these terms, the CRL is the state (“angular momentum up”, north pole on a generalized Bloch sphere) and the lowest- state is (“angular momentum down”, south pole) Englefield1972 (); Gay1989 (). A resonant rf-drive at angular frequency induces a rotation of between the north and south poles at a frequency , where is the polarized rf electric field amplitude. This rotation maps the angular momentum down state into the CRL in a time .

For Rubidium (Fig. 1b), the levels with are shifted by the quantum defects due to the finite size of the atomic core Gallagher1994 (). Only the levels with arrange in the hydrogenic pattern and are connected by degenerate transitions (blue arrow on Fig. 1b). For , the state is shifted far away from the hydrogenic multiplicity. However, a fortunate coincidence makes the rf transition between the laser-accessible state and the first hydrogenic = level nearly degenerate with all other transitions toward . Hence, only the two lowest states are non-resonant. The transfer from to the CRL is a nearly -rotation of the hydrogenic angular momentum , through a subset of its levels (in red on Fig. 1b).

The experiment takes place in a structure made up of a capacitor producing , surrounded by four ring electrodes, on which we apply the rf signal at MHz and dc potentials (Fig. 1c). It is crossed by a Rubidium thermal beam (atomic velocity 250 m/s). Atoms are excited from the ground state by three laser beams resonant on the transitions (780 nm), (776 nm) and (1258 nm). The 780 nm and 776 nm laser beams are -polarized and collinear with the quantization axis, defined by a dc electric field () applied across the ring electrodes during the pulsed laser excitation. The 1258 nm laser beam is -polarized and perpendicular to the others. After laser excitation, a potential applied to the capacitor is switched-on in s, resulting in a field with V/cm. This Stark switching prepares the initial state  Nussenzveig1993 ().

At the end of the sequence, the atoms drift out of the capacitor towards a field-ionization detector, which resolves the initial and circular Rydberg states but doesn’t resolve them from levels with similar energies. In order to selectively detect neighboring levels with (Fig. 1b) we use selective mw probe pulses, which transfer into another manifold, easily resolved by the field ionization detector.

Figure 2: (color online) (a) Rabi oscillation induced by the polarization component of the rf field on the transition. Population of versus the rf pulse duration (dots). We fit the frequency of the oscillation (red line) to . (b) Autler-Townes doublet of the transition dressed by the rf field. Points are experimental and the red lines are Gaussian fits leading to .

The rf transfer from to requires a pure rf polarization, in order to avoid transitions with and to confine the evolution inside . By applying on the four ring electrodes 230 MHz signals with the proper phases and amplitudes, we can in principle generate a pure field in the center of the structure.

Due to the difference in the electrode driving line transmission and the capacitive coupling between the electrodes, these phases and amplitudes cannot be predetermined. We therefore use an optimization procedure, based on the direct measurement of the and amplitude. The rf component is measured by tuning the electric field to  V/cm, so that the transition between and ( and on figure 1b), coupled to the field, is resonant at 230 MHz. All other transitions from or are then out of resonance due to the quantum defects. The rf thus induces Rabi oscillation at a frequency where is the amplitude of the component and the dipole matrix element of this transition. In order to measure the field amplitude, we align the electric field along the direction instead of . The atom is then prepared in the state with respect to the reversed axis (noted ). The transition between and is driven by the polarization w.r.t. , i.e. the polarization w.r.t. .

The full optimization procedure is described in SI (). Fig. 2a presents the slow Rabi oscillation between and due to the weak residual component. A fit (solid red line) yields a Rabi oscillation frequency . Fig. 2b presents the Autler-Townes doublet induced by the strong component probed on the to mw transition. We get . The polarization purity is thus remarkably large, with . It is consistent with the spatial inhomogeneity of the rf field over the extension of the atomic sample (about one mm) calculated using the SIMION software package.

As a first test, we use this optimized 230 MHz rf field to prepare the CRL by the standard adiabatic transfer method Nussenzveig1993 (). To allow us to use calibrated mw probes SI (), we perform this experiment in the 51 manifold. We initially prepare the atoms in and set the electric field to so that . The rf field power is ramped up in . The electric field is then linearly decreased to () in , so that crosses the resonance. The rf is finally switched off in . We record the number of detected atoms as a function of the ionization field (Fig. 3a). The cyan dashed line presents the ionization signal of the initial level. The black line shows the signal when the adiabatic passage is performed. It is now centered around the ionization field of the CRL . From the residual number of atom detected at the ionization field of the level, we estimate that the transfer efficiency is larger than 98%. The difference of height between the cyan and black signals provides the relative detection efficiency, , between the and levels. This low value is mainly due to the difference of lifetimes between the levels.

Figure 3: (color online) Adiabatic passage in the manifold. (a) Field ionization spectra (signal versus the field applied in the ionization detector) of the initial state (dashed cyan line) and at the end of the adiabatic passage sequence (solid black line). (b) Populations for of the states (color code for the levels identification in the inset) as a function of the Rabi frequency . Dots are experimental with statistical error bars. The solid lines are the result of a numerical simulation of the full Hamiltonian evolution.

We investigate the adiabatic transfer as a function of . The populations of the levels (points in Fig. 3 with statistical error bars) are measured with calibrated mw probes SI () as a function of the applied rf amplitude, proportional to . The conversion factor is determined from the measurement of (Fig. 2). The data are in excellent agreement with the result of a numerical simulation of the ideal evolution in a pure rf field (solid lines). For MHz, the population of the CRL is remarkably close to one, the total population of the levels being at most 5% (note that a part of this spurious population is overestimated due to mw probe imperfections). This is another demonstration of the excellent rf polarization control achieved here.

Figure 4: (color online) Dynamics of the atomic state for a rf pulse duration . (a) Long timescale evolution of the CRL population, (dots). The solid line is the result of a numerical simulation, with and a rf pulse shortened by to model the rise and fall times of the driving electronics. (b) Populations for around the second maximum of (same color conventions as in Fig.2). Dots are experimental and solid lines are the results of the simulation. (c) Calculated (bars) and measured (open circles) populations at the top of the second CRL population maximum. (d) Enlargement of (a) around three late CRL population maxima. (e) Calculated (bars) and measured (open circles) populations at the top of the first CRL population maximum in (d). For all panels, the experimental error bars correspond to the statistical fluctuations.

We now investigate the circular state preparation in the resonant rf regime, which provides the coherent transfer between a low- state and the CRL. The field is adjusted to corresponding to . We select a fixed rf amplitude. We scan the pulse duration and measure the state populations as above. The circular state population (dots in Fig. 4a with statistical error bars) exhibits periodic peaks. They reveal more than 20 full Rabi oscillations over 6 s, demonstrating the coherence of the atomic evolution. A fit of these data with a numerical simulation of the ideal Hamiltonian evolution in a pure rf field (solid line) provides a calibration of the rf Rabi frequency MHz and of the effective rf pulse duration, which is slightly different () from due to the finite rise and fall times of the electronic drive.

On Fig. 4b we plot the populations for around the second CRL population maximum. We observe for and the theoretically expected double peak structure, typical of a multi-level Rabi oscillation. Fig. 4c presents the calculated (bars) and measured (open circles) population at . The deviations w.r.t the hydrogen atom model become more important with time, since the quantum defects affect the evolution each time the atom returns to low- states. Fig 4d shows an enlargement of the evolution at long times (dots) together with the numerical prediction (solid line) and Fig 4e the calculated (bars) and measured (open circles) populations at . The agreement between theory and experiment remains excellent up to large time intervals , demonstrating the coherence of the oscillation over long time scales.

This experiment shows that it is possible to perform an efficient coherent Rabi oscillation from the low- state to the CRL within . The limited transfer rate (%) is mainly explained by the the absence of the states in the angular momentum ladder due to their large quantum defects and to the residual quantum defect of . These residual imperfections could be reduced by tailoring the amplitude and the frequency of the rf field via optimal control Palao2013 () .

We envision a phase gate between an optical and a mw photon, along the lines proposed in Pritchard2014 () for low-angular momentum Rydberg states. It relies on a dense ensemble of ground state Rb atoms prepared in their hyperfine ground state, and held by a laser dipole trap inside a high-quality open Fabry Perot mw resonator Raimond2001a () tuned to the transition between and . An incoming optical photon is transformed into a collective excitation in the ground state Duan2001 (). A laser pulse coherently transfers this excitation into the Rydberg level, immediately cast onto the circular state. The atom is then coupled to the cavity for the duration of a resonant Rabi rotation on the 50 to 51 transition. If the cavity contains one mw photon, this results in a conditional phase shift for the atom Nogues1999 (). This shift is brought back to the ground state by the time-reversed excitation process and converted back into an optical photon. All the components of this innovative hybrid photon-photon quantum gate have now been tested separately, including the transfer between the low- and the CRL. Assembling these components would bridge the gap between optical quantum communication and quantum information manipulations based on mw cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics.

We acknowledge funding by the EU under the ERC projet ‘DECLIC’ (Project ID: 246932) and the RIA project ‘RYSQ’ (Project ID: 640378).


  • (1) J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001).
  • (2) M. Brune et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4887 (1996).
  • (3) C. Guerlin et al., Nature 448, 889 (2007).
  • (4) C. Sayrin et al., Nature 477, 73 (2011).
  • (5) R. C. Teixeira et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 013001 (2015).
  • (6) S. D. Hogan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 063004 (2012).
  • (7) M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science 339, 1169 (2013).
  • (8) H. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060401 (2011).
  • (9) D. Maxwell et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 043827 (2014).
  • (10) R. W. Andrews et al., Nat. Phys. 10, 321 (2014).
  • (11) J. I. Cirac and H. J. Kimble, Nature Photonics 11, 18 (2017).
  • (12) T. A. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 113003 (2008).
  • (13) M. Reetz-Lamour, T. Amthor, J. Deiglmayr, and M. Weidemüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 253001 (2008).
  • (14) Y. Miroshnychenko et al., Phys. Rev. A 82, 013405 (2010).
  • (15) T. Peyronel et al., Nature 488, 57 (2012).
  • (16) V. Parigi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233602 (2012).
  • (17) S. Baur, D. Tiarks, G. Rempe, and S. Dürr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 073901 (2014).
  • (18) D. Paredes-Barato and C. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 040501 (2014).
  • (19) J. D. Pritchard, J. A. Isaacs, M. A. Beck, R. McDermott, and M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 89, 1 (2014), 1310.3910.
  • (20) L. M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature 414, 413 (2001).
  • (21) R. G. Hulet and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1430 (1983).
  • (22) P. Nussenzveig et al., Phys. Rev. A 48, 3991 (1993).
  • (23) D. Delande and J. Gay, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 5, 303 (1988).
  • (24) J. Hare, M. Gross, and P. Goy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1938 (1988).
  • (25) T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg AtomsCambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
  • (26) H. Bethe and E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One-and Two-Electron Atoms, 1957 (Springer, Berlin, 1977).
  • (27) R. Lutwak et al., Phys. Rev. A 56, 1443 (1997).
  • (28) M. Englefield, Group theory and the Coulomb Problem (Wiley-Interscience, 1972).
  • (29) J.-C. Gay, D. Delande, and A. Bommier, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6587 (1989).
  • (30) See Supplementary Material .
  • (31) J. P. Palao, D. M. Reich, and C. P. Koch, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053409 (2013).
  • (32) G. Nogues et al., Nature 400, 239 (1999).

Appendix A Supplemental Material

We present here the procedure that we followed to optimize the polarization of the rf created by the ring electrodes, and the calibration of the probes that we used to measure the population of the Stark levels ().

a.1 A. Polarization optimization procedure

In order to generate a high-purity polarized rf field we optimize the phases and amplitudes of the rf drives applied on each of the four ring electrodes ( labeling the electrodes from 1 to 4, 1 and 3 on the one hand and 2 and 4 on the other being diametrically opposite). The final adjustment should minimize the component and produce a much larger field with a good spatial homogeneity around the centre of the structure. This adjustment must be impervious to the imperfections due to the complex standing waves in the transmission lines, to the cross-talks between the capacitively-coupled electrodes and to the imperfections of the geometry.

The components are measured as explained in the main text. The Rabi frequencies are measured using either the spectroscopy of the Autler Townes doublet induced on a probe mw transition or the direct temporal measurement of the induced Rabi oscillation.

We first apply the rf on only one electrode and measure the amplitude of the field it generates when all the others are grounded. We then adjust so that electrode 3 generates a field with the same amplitude as electrode 1, and so that electrode 4 generates a field with the same amplitude as electrode 2. We finally set the relative phase between 1 and 3 (respectively 2 and 4), in order to maximize the amplitude of the field generated when electrodes 1 and 3 (2 and 4) are driven simultaneously.

We now cancel the total component. We first measure the amplitude of the component created by each pair of electrodes (pair 1-3 or pair 2-4) separately. We scale and together so that pair 2-4 generates the same amplitude as pair 1-3. Finally, driving the four electrodes, we set the relative phases between the two pairs to minimize the global amplitude.

From this initial setting, the field amplitude is varied by scaling with the same factor all the amplitudes applied on the four electrodes by means of identical variables attenuators driven by a common signal.

a.2 B. Calibration of the microwave probes efficiency

In order to measure the populations of the Stark levels () we use mw probes tuned to the two-photon transitions from to , which are resolved in the applied electric field of 3,8 V/cm. For each transition, we perform a pulse ideally transferring all the population of into . In practice each pulse has a limited efficiency. Moreover, the detection efficiency of levels and is different. We denote by the overall transfer efficiency between and . We estimate it by preparing selectively and measuring the fraction of atoms detected at the ionization threshold of after a probe pulse.

We prepare by first exciting or with a laser pulse. We then transfer the atoms into the level () using a mw pulse. We finally apply a rf adiabatic passage, which ideally maps with into with respectively.

Due to imperfections in the preparation process, the states neighboring are also slightly populated, which leads to underestimate . For levels and , theses spurious population are small and the and populations in figures 3 and 4 are slightly overestimated. The preparation of leads to comparable populations in and . We use them both to get an underestimated value of and .

The probability to end-up in the state is then

where is the number of atom detected in after the mw probe pulse, and is the initial population in the laser-excited .

Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description