Classical percolation fingerprints in the high temperature regime of quantum Hall effect

# Classical percolation fingerprints in the high temperature regime of quantum Hall effect

## Abstract

We have performed magnetotransport experiments in the high-temperature regime (up to 50 K) of the integer quantum Hall effect for two-dimensional electron gases in semiconducting heterostructures. While the magnetic field dependence of the classical Hall law presents no anomaly at high temperatures, we find a breakdown of the Drude-Lorentz law for the longitudinal conductance beyond a crossover magnetic field T, which turns out to be correlated with the onset of the integer quantum Hall effect at low temperatures. We show that the high magnetic field regime at can be understood in terms of classical percolative transport in a smooth disordered potential. From the temperature dependence of the peak longitudinal conductance, we extract scaling exponents which are in good agreement with the theoretically expected values. We also prove that inelastic scattering on phonons is responsible for dissipation in a wide temperature range going from 1 to 50 K at high magnetic fields.

###### pacs:
73.43.-f,72.15.Rn,64.60.ah

## 1 Introduction

Two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) under perpendicular magnetic fields have revealed at low temperatures a wealth of surprising transport properties [1, 2, 3], which are direct manifestations of quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale. Remarkably, in the same 2DEG system one may observe gradually by increasing the magnitude of the magnetic field different quantum phenomena [4]: Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) oscillations, followed by integer and then fractional quantum Hall effects (QHE). All these effects capitalize on the quantization of the cyclotron orbital motion resulting from the Lorentz force, which gives rise to discrete kinetic energy levels (with a positive integer, the cyclotron frequency, the electron charge, the effective mass, and Planck’s constant divided by ). The QHE characterized by a spectacularly robust quantization of the Hall conductance in integral [1] or fractional [2] multiples of differ from the SdH (diffusive) regime by the quasi-absence of dissipation in the bulk, as vindicated by the spectacular drop in magnitude of the longitudinal conductance minima. This transition is usually understood with the onset of a quasi-ballistic transport regime [5], associated with the localization of all the bulk states except at the center of a Landau level [4] where a diffusive electronic propagation throughout the system can set in only via percolation. A semiclassical localization mechanism [6, 7, 8] resulting from the decoupling of the (quantized) cyclotron motion with the guiding center, which leads to a quasi-regular drift of the electronic states along constant energy contours of the smooth disorder potential landscape, has recently been confirmed [9, 10] by scanning tunneling spectroscopy in the integer QHE regime. Percolative spatial structures for the local density of states taking place at the transition between Hall plateaus have also been clearly identified in this local probe experiment [9]. Signatures of percolation in transport properties have been mainly discussed in the literature [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17] at very low temperatures (typically below K), when several quantum mechanical effects (tunneling, quantum coherence, etc…) play a role [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26] and complicate the analysis both theoretically and experimentally. However, if the localization mechanism for the QHE is classical in nature, we expect these percolative features at high magnetic fields to be also observable at much higher temperatures, in a classical transport regime.

In this paper, we study the nature of the high magnetic field, high temperature transport regime, combining experimental measurements in the 1-50 K range with recent theoretical predictions [27, 28]. We first identify a crossover magnetic field T above which chaotic classical (diffusive) dynamics breaks down, that we correlate to the onset of QHE at low temperature. This observation points to the common origin of long-range disorder in suppressing the diffusive regime, both in the classical and quantum realms. For we observe various scaling laws that demonstrate the combined role of phonon scattering and classical percolation in the transport properties.

## 2 Observation of a breakdown of Drude-Lorentz law in high magnetic field

The 2DEGs used in our study are delta-doped AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures patterned into a Hall bar. The transport measurements were performed with a standard low frequency lock-in technique for temperatures between 1.2 K and 50 K in a variable temperature insert, under magnetic fields up to 11 T. The first (second) sample has a mobility 10 cm/Vs at 1.2 K (8 10 cm/Vs), and an electron density 10 cm (7 10 cm). The two samples differ also by their growth process since sample 1 is an heterojunction, while sample 2 is a quantum well [29]. A particular attention has been paid to the mobility range of the samples chosen to investigate the high-temperature regime of the QHE. On the one hand, high enough mobility was required by the need to clearly separate the crossover magnetic field for which the classical localization is expected to set in and the -scale where the quantization of the cyclotron motion starts to be felt (typically, T corresponds to for the lowest temperatures studied here). On the other hand, very high mobility samples had to be avoided because of the importance of many-body effects (such as e.g. spin splitting) blurring the physics under consideration.

The -dependences of the Hall and longitudinal resistances for sample 1 are shown in Fig. 1 at low and high temperatures ( K and K, respectively). The low- field-dependence is quite standard with the appearance of well-formed plateaus for Hall resistance which are accompanied by strong oscillations of the longitudinal resistance with vanishing minima for fields T. We note that peaks of start to be spin-resolved for T at this low temperature due to the critical many-body enhancement of the spin gap. At high , becomes structureless and exhibits a linear dependence in field as expected from classical Hall’s law. The observed longitudinal magnetoresistance shows a richer and more instructive field dependence. While saturates according to the classical behavior at low magnetic fields, it shows for T a steady super-linear increase with the magnetic field. A similar positive and slightly non-linear magnetoresistance is found for sample 2, see Appendix.

This transition regime for the longitudinal dissipative transport coefficient is better analyzed in terms of conductance rather than resistance, see Fig. 2. The magnetic field separating the SdH regime from the integer QHE regime is identified at low in the range 1-2 T by the exponential drop of in its minima values. It is interesting to correlate this observation with the measurement performed at high , especially on a logarithmic scale as shown in Fig. 2. Classically, is expected to obey the Drude-Lorentz law,

 σL=nee2m∗τtr1+(ωcτtr)2, (1)

where is the transport time determined by the combined scattering on the (random) impurity potential and by phonons. As long as , remains constant, while a quadratic decrease is expected when . Drude’s law (1), also associated to a constant magnetoresistance in Fig. 1, is well verified up to the magnetic field T, with 10 s at K. Above , an anomalous power-law dependence, namely with , is revealed by the logarithmic plot of Fig. 2. Interestingly, we note that this breakdown of Drude’s law at high appears correlated to the onset of the QHE at low . Because we are working at a relatively high , it is very likely that this breakdown has a purely classical origin.

A linear classical magnetoresistance in several high-mobility samples at high , qualitatively similar to that shown in Fig. 1, has already been reported several years ago by Rötger et al. [30]. These observations were correlated to the empirical proportionality relation between longitudinal and Hall resistances, , originally pointed out in the low temperature quantum Hall regime in Ref. [31]. Indeed, in the classical Hall regime where , this empirical relation predicts a purely linear longitudinal magnetoresistance. It has been argued that this linear behavior at high temperature could be explained by macroscopic density inhomogeneities in the sample [32]. Nevertheless, we note that this interpretation leaves unexplained the clear transition to the constant Drude-Lorentz resistance at low magnetic field as observed in our data, see Fig. 1.

More recent studies by Renard et al. [33] evidenced obvious non-linearities in the high magnetoconductance, with a dependence and an exponent . This translates into a high-field dependence for the conductance , where the exponent . This turns out to be higher than the value of that we have extracted for sample 1, but all these measurements concur to invalidate both the high-field Drude-Lorentz law and the empirical relation (between and ) leading to . The appearance of a non-integer exponent is rooted in the percolative nature of transport in actual samples, which is the main issue addressed in this paper.

Note that in our other sample 2, we obtain (see Appendix), i.e., again a non-linearity of the magnetoconductance. The error bars on the high-field scaling exponent are mainly due to the limited range of magnetic field which can be used, making a very accurate extraction of difficult from a simple field-dependence. Indeed, even at K, Landau level quantization gives rise to noticeable quantum oscillations of superposed to the power-law scaling background , since for magnetic field T.

To understand these discrepancies between the different extracted exponents, it is necessary to better characterize the disorder potential in the different samples. The analysis of the magnetic field dependence of SdH oscillations at temperature K leads to a quantum lifetime ps for sample 1, and ps for sample 2. The transport lifetimes calculated at the same temperature from mobility measurements ( ps in sample 1, and ps in sample 2) are in both samples larger than the quantum lifetimes, what shows the dominant contribution of long range scattering due to a long range disorder potential. The ratio of the transport time to the single-particle scattering time ( in sample 1, in sample 2) is however not as strong for sample 2, indicating the non negligible contribution of short range scattering mechanisms in the sample (such as, e.g., surface roughness), which could be at the origin of the observed discrepancies. With the help of a theoretical analysis of the data to be developped in the next section, we will first confirm the above exponent values by using in addition the temperature scaling of the magnetoconductance, which will further support the present interpretation for the exponent dispersions.

## 3 Theoretical analysis of magnetotransport data

A breakdown of law (1) has been predicted in a few theoretical papers [34, 35] addressing long-range disorder at large magnetic field. Essentially, Drude-Lorentz formula relies on classical diffusive transport with chaotic electronic motion due to elastic collisions on impurities at low magnetic fields. When the cyclotron radius becomes basically smaller than the correlation length of the disorder potential, this evolves at high magnetic fields into a quasi-ballistic transport regime with a regular motion of the guiding center along the constant energy contours of the disorder potential landscape, which follows mainly closed trajectories. Macroscopic transport then only takes place by following an extended percolating backbone occurring at a single critical energy and passing through many saddle points of the disorder landscape. The fractal nature of the percolating contour is expected to give rise to non-trivial universal exponents in the temperature and magnetic field dependences of , as reported here at high magnetic fields. However, it is worth stressing that the percolating contour alone is not sufficient to allow macroscopic transport, since the guiding center drift velocity vanishes at the saddle-points of the disorder landscape. Different microscopic dissipative processes may a priori be at play to provide a finite drift velocity at these transport bottlenecks, an issue that will be clarified in the present work.

It has been argued in Ref. [34], that the high temperature crossover field for the Drude-Lorentz breakdown should be quite close to the low temperature transition between the SdH and QHE regimes. Our experiments in the two samples corroborate this scenario. However, the classical prediction [34] of an exponential suppression of with above , which is based on a mechanism of dissipative transport via a stochastic layer around the percolating contour resulting from elastic scattering on the disorder random potential only, is not consistent with the power-law decrease seen in Fig. 2, hinting at more efficient relaxation processes.

We now provide detailed theoretical analysis of our experimental data. The high- percolative transport regime can be described in terms of a Ohm’s law involving a local conductivity tensor [36, 37, 27, 28], which takes the form

 ^σ(r)=(σ0−σH(r)σH(r)σ0), (2)

where encodes dissipative processes (assumed to be uniform), and is the local Hall component, whose spatial dependence originates from charge density fluctuations due to disorder in the sample. The local conductivity model expresses the inhomogeneous nature of the high-magnetic field transport, which results from the formation of local equilibrium, and is valid at temperatures high enough so that phase-breaking processes, such as electron-phonon scattering, occur on length scales that are shorter than the typical variations of disorder. The Ohmic conductivity is assumed very weak [i.e., ] but finite. A priori, it may be due to other scattering mechanisms than elastic impurity scattering such as electron-phonon scattering [36, 38, 27, 28]. It has been found [37, 27] from model (2) that the longitudinal conductance scales as

 σL=C[σ0(T,B)]1−κ∣∣ ∣∣e2h√⟨V2⟩∞∑n=0n′F(En−μ)∣∣ ∣∣κ, (3)

where is a non-trivial exponent previously conjectured [37] to be , a result confirmed recently by a diagrammatic approach [27]. Here is a nonuniversal dimensionless constant, is the chemical potential, and is the derivative of the Fermi-Dirac distribution function. Formula (3) has been established under the assumption that follows linearly the spatial fluctuations of disorder , what requires a sufficiently high . Typically, it does not describe the low temperature regime [39, 28] when the peak conductance starts to level off around conductance values of the order of (per spin). Another important limitation of formula (3) is the assumption of a Gaussian correlated disorder with a single correlation length, which is valid for impurities located far away from the gas and in absence of sources of short-range impurity scattering. For instance, sample 2 (a quantum well) is likely characterized by multi-scale disorder, which would involve extra (unknown) microscopic parameters in the modelling , making difficult a quantitative comparison to theory (see discussion in Appendix).

In addition, model (2) leads [37, 28] to the conventional classical Hall’s law at , where fingerprints of percolations are absent. It predicts therefore a slight breakdown of the empirical proportionality law (between and ) due to the non-linearity related to the non-integer exponent . Indeed, this gives at high magnetic field , which is non-linear for . It has been argued [37] however that the presence of disorder on multiple length scales tends to increase the exponent towards 1, thus recovering the empirical proportionality law in the case of more inhomogeneous samples.

Expression (3) yields oscillations of in in the percolation regime when , which are superposed on a high- classical background conductance (obtained for )

 Missing or unrecognized delimiter for \right (4)

It has been predicted [27] that the peak values for are given by the formula

 σpeakL=σbg(T,B)[1+∞∑l=14π2lkBTℏωccsch(2π2lkBTℏωc)]κ. (5)

We deduce from Eq. (4) that in the classical percolative regime should scale in as . Provided that is quasi-constant in magnetic field, we find a power-law scaling , which globally agrees with the experimental -dependences reported above.

We now consider the temperature dependence of the conductance in the percolative transport regime, focusing on the spin-unresolved conductance peaks indicated by arrows on Fig. 2. In the low temperature range, we monitor and follow the conductance maxima, which are plotted as triangles on Fig. 3. At higher , these peaks are washed out and cannot be followed individually anymore, but the magnetic field may be then kept constant, as the conductance becomes weakly field-dependent (circles on Fig. 3). We also note that the opening of the spin gap at the highest magnetic fields considered here limits the temperature range where Zeeman and many body effects can be neglected.

We first observe on Fig. 3 the presence of a pronounced minimum at a temperature that perfectly correlates for each peak with the scale where quantized Landau levels start to emerge, a striking effect that went previously unnoticed to our knowledge. In addition, two different power-law scalings (with a negative power at and positive one at ) are clearly seen, that we would like to attribute to the critical state associated to classical percolation. It can be easily noted from Fig. 3 that the classical conductance seems to scale as for , what implies a linear temperature dependence for according to Eq. (4).

In order to understand this rich temperature dependence of the conductance peaks, we now need to characterize microscopically the missing piece in formulas (4)-(5), namely the dissipative contribution . Its origin may be the inelastic electrons-phonons scattering, as has been put forward in many theoretical papers [38, 40, 41]. If we assume that the electrons undergo a large number of scattering events on the phonons, i.e., their rate is much higher than the characteristic frequency of drift motion, we can estimate the short-distance dissipative conductivity using the Drude-Lorentz formula

 σ0=nee2m∗τph1+(ωcτph)2, (6)

where is the electron-phonon scattering time. Our estimation of in the regime of the quantum Hall effect follows that from Ref. [42] using Fermi’s golden rule [43]. This yields [42] a scattering rate . Inserting this result in Eq. (6), we obtain that indeed scales linearly in temperature and is independent of magnetic field whenever , vindicating an asumption made earlier. It is worth mentioning that the temperature range where the linear -dependence of is valid increases at high magnetic fields [42]. The saturation of due the spontaneaous phonon emission [45] is expected to take place typically at low temperatures in the Kelvin range, which is beyond the present analysis.

From the established law, formulas (3-5) predict that the cyclotron energy separates two distinct physical regimes of transport: i) at percolation of guiding centers carrying a classical cyclotron motion occurs, leading to . This is easily established by noting that the r.h.s. term under brackets in Eq. (5) becomes constant in temperature; ii) at , the cyclotron motion becomes quantized while the transport of the guiding center remains classical, changing the -dependence into a negative power-law . This new power-law derives directly from Eq. (3), noting that the Fermi function derivative behaves as at low temperature. The assumption of a dissipation mechanism with phonons combined with formula (5) thus not only describe qualitatively our data for the temperature dependence of , but also provides a very precise way of extracting the classical exponent .

The fits performed on Fig. 3 for three successive plateau transitions yield the results given in Table 1. This comparison is performed by considering , where the amplitude and the critical exponent are the only fitting parameters. We find that the agreement between the experimental data and the fitting curve is excellent for almost two decades in temperatures. The consistency of the results obtained from both the temperature and magnetic field dependences of also provides good confidence in the theory. For the peak located at the transition between filling factors 10 to 8 ( T), the values extracted for the critical exponent are very close to the theoretical prediction . We note that the agreement weakens for lower filling factors, where spin splitting effects may play an increasing role that we have not accounted for in the calculation.

Turning to sample 2, the analysis of the temperature dependence of each studied conductance peak yields (for more details, see Appendix), which is consistent with the exponent extracted from the -dependence. This slightly larger value for the classical percolation exponent in sample 2 could be due to the presence of disorder fluctuations over different length scales, which have the effect of increasing the effective percolation exponent as discussed in Ref. [37]. Indeed, sample 2 is a narrow (8.2 nm) quantum well, which, in addition to impurity potential, exposes the electron gas to interface roughness.

## 4 Summary

In conclusion, we have shown that the onset of the quantum Hall effect at low temperatures is directly linked with a breakdown of the classical diffusive regime at high temperatures. We have pointed out that temperature and magnetic field dependences of the longitudinal conductance follow peculiar scaling power-laws in the breakdown regime. We have found a good agreement between theory and experimental data, which confirms that transport is dominated by classical percolation in a wide temperature range going from 1 to 50 K in 2DEGs at high magnetic fields. The analysis also shows that the interaction of phonons with bulk drift states provides the dominant dissipation mechanism at play in this temperature regime.

## Acknowledgments

We thank D. Basko and V. Renard for interesting discussions, and ANR “METROGRAPH” under Grant No. ANR-2011-NANO-004-06 for financial support.

## Appendix

We present in this appendix the results obtained for sample 2 (quantum well), which has been grown differently from sample 1 (heterojunction). We will follow the logic of the main text, by first considering the magnetic field dependence, and finally the temperature behavior of the longitudinal conductance in the high temperature regime of the quantum Hall effect.

### .1 Magnetic field dependence of transport coefficients in sample 2

In Fig. 4, we present the magnetic field dependences of the Hall and longitudinal resistances observed in sample 2, at temperatures K and 50 K. At low temperatures, the integer quantum Hall effect is clearly observed above magnetic fields T. As reported in Fig. 1, the longitudinal resistance of the second sample also displays a steady increase with the magnetic field for fields T at high temperatures, a behavior which turns out to be again correlated with the onset of the quantum Hall effect at low temperatures. We note that the transition from the Shubnikov-de Haas regime to the quantum Hall regime occurs at a slightly higher crossover field than in sample 1. This observation is consistent with the fact that the mobility in sample 2 is smaller than in sample 1 (which is likely characterized by a smoother disorder potential landscape).

The -dependence of the longitudinal transport coefficient can be better analyzed quantitatively in terms of conductance in a logarithmic scale, as shown in Fig. 5. The Drude-Lorentz law Eq. (1) perfectly describes the low-field part of the conductance and yields s at K. At higher magnetic fields T, the Drude-lorentz law also clearly breaks down in sample 2, with the scaling dependence and .

### .2 Temperature dependence of the peak longitudinal conductance in sample 2

As discussed in the main text, a more accurate determination of the percolation exponent is most conveniently obtained from the temperature dependence of the longitudinal conductance at peak values. At temperatures of the order of the cyclotron gap (), the maxima are washed out, so that the temperature dependence is then followed by working at constant -field. The conductance peaks are studied in the breakdown regime at fields , and are chosen such that the (unknown) temperature dependence of the spin gap does not play a role. Obviously, this puts a stringent constraint on the allowed peaks. The arrows in Fig. 5 indicate the peaks that we have analyzed in detail for sample 2.

The temperature dependences of the selected peaks are shown in Fig. 6 where a double logarithmic scale is used to better display the scaling laws. As reported for sample 1 in the main text, a minimum at the characteristic temperature scale separating two temperature regimes with different scalings is seen for each studied peak in sample 2. This is again qualitatively consistent with formula (5). Note however, that in contrast to sample 1, the low temperature conductance peaks exceed the maximum value (in the spin degenerate case) expected for a smooth potential [39, 28], see Fig. 6. Formula (5) is thus not appropriate to fit quantitatively the whole temperature range, as performed successfully with sample 1. We remind that formula (5) is derived for a smooth disorder potential characterized by a single length scale, an assumption which may not be totally correct for sample 2. Indeed the latter is a narrow quantum well with important surface roughness (and correspondingly lower mobility), which is not accounted for in our model. We thus confine our study of the critical exponents to the high temperature regime above , where density fluctuations are thermally smeared, so that equation (4) should still be valid in this regime. The resulting high-temperature longitudinal conductance is expressed as , where is an amplitude dependent on magnetic field that will be taken as fit parameter. A second fit parameter is given by the critical exponent , and the results are compiled in Table 2.

As a result, the extracted values for the exponent in sample 2 are still close to the theoretical prediction , although we note here a slight overestimation. The systematic bias in observed in sample 2 could also be attributed to the more pronounced roughness of the disordered potential landscape compared to sample 1, as discussed above.

## References

### References

1. K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980).
2. D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982).
3. T. Ando, A. B. Fowler, and F. Stern, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 437 (1982).
4. The Quantum Hall Effect, edited by R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin (Springer, New York, 1987).
5. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9375 (1988).
6. S. V. Iordansky, Solid State Commun. 43, 1 (1982).
7. R. F. Kazarinov and S. Luryi, Phys. Rev. B 25, 7626 (1982).
8. S. A. Trugman, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7539 (1983).
9. K. Hashimoto, C. Sohrmann, J. Wiebe, T. Inaoka, F. Meier, Y. Hirayama, R. A. Römer, R. Wiesendanger, and M. Morgenstern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 256802 (2008).
10. K. Hashimoto, T. Champel, S. Florens, C. Sohrmann, J. Wiebe, Y. Hirayama, R. A. Römer, R. Wiesendanger, and M. Morgenstern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116805 (2012).
11. H. P. Wei, D. C. Tsui, M. A. Paalanen, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1294 (1988).
12. H. P. Wei, S. Y. Lin, and D. C. Tsui, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Phys. Rev. B 45, 3926 (1992).
13. W. Li, G. A. Csáthy, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 206807 (2005).
14. Y. J. Zhao, T. Tu, X. J. Hao, G. C. Guo, H. W. Jiang, and G. P. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 78, 233301 (2008).
15. W. Li, C. L. Vicente, J. S. Xia, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 216801 (2009).
16. W. Li, J. S. Xia, C. Vicente, N. S. Sullivan, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. B 81, 033305 (2010).
17. K. Saeed, N. A. Dodoo-Amoo, L. H. Li, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and J. E. Cunningham, Phys. Rev. B 84, 155324 (2011).
18. J. T. Chalker and P. D. Coddington, J. Phys. C 21, 2665 (1988).
19. B. Huckestein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 357 (1995).
20. B. M. Gammel and F. Evers, Phys. Rev. B 57, 14829 (1998).
21. P. Cain and R. A. Römer, Europhys. Lett. 66, 104 (2004).
22. B. Kramer, T. Ohtsuki, and S. Kettemann, Phys. Rep. 417, 211 (2005).
23. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
24. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Phys. Rev. B 80, 041304(R) (2009).
25. M. Amado, A. V. Malyshev, A. Sedrakyan, and F. Dominguez-Adame, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 066402 (2011).
26. H. Obuse, I. A. Gruzberg, and F. Evers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 206804 (2012).
27. M. Flöser, S. Florens, and T. Champel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 176806 (2011).
28. M. Flöser, S. Florens, and T. Champel, Int. J. Mod. Phys: Conf. Series 11, 49 (2012).
29. This sample was originally grown at Institute for Microstructural Sciences, National Research Council, Ottawa K1A 0R6, Canada.
30. T. Rötger, G. J. C. L. Bruls, J. C. Maan, P. Wyder, K. Ploog, G. Wiemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 90 (1989).
31. A. M. Chang and D. C. Tsui, Solid State Commun. 56, 153 (1985).
32. H. Hirai, S. Komiyama, S. Sasa, and T. Fujii, Solid State Commun. 72, 1033 (1989).
33. V. Renard, Z. D. Kvon, G. M. Gusev, and J. C. Portal, Phys. Rev. B 70, 033303 (2004).
34. M. M. Fogler, A. Yu. Dobin, V. I. Perel, and B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. B 56, 6823 (1997).
35. D. G. Polyakov, F. Evers, A. D. Mirlin, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. B 64, 205306 (2001).
36. I. M. Ruzin, Phys. Rev. B 47, 15727 (1993).
37. S. H. Simon and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3278 (1994).
38. D. G. Polyakov and B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 150 (1995).
39. A. M. Dykhne and I. M. Ruzin, Phys. Rev. B 50, 2369 (1994).
40. M. M. Fogler and B. I. Shklovskii, Sol. State Comm. 94, 503 (1995).
41. M. M. Fogler, D. G. Polyakov and B. I. Shklovskii, Surf. Sci. 361, 255 (1996).
42. H. L. Zhao and S. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4134 (1993).
43. This derivation is close to the standard textbook version [44] of electron-phonon scattering, which has to be extended to take into account the Landau levels quantization.
44. V. F. Gantmakher and Y. B. Levinson, Carrier scattering in Metals and Semiconductors, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987).
45. S. Iordanski and Y. Levinson, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7308 (1996).
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters