Chiral polarization scale of QCD vacuum and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking

Chiral polarization scale of QCD vacuum and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking

Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth333The Speaker. George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA aalexan@gwu.edu, horvath@pa.uky.edu
Abstract

It has recently been found that dynamics of pure glue QCD supports the low energy band of Dirac modes with local chiral properties qualitatively different from that of a bulk: while bulk modes suppress chirality relative to statistical independence between left and right, the band modes enhance it. The width of such chirally polarized zone – chiral polarization scale – has been shown to be finite in the continuum limit at fixed physical volume. Here we present evidence that remains non–zero also in the infinite volume, and is therefore a dynamical scale in the theory. Our experiments in N=2+1 QCD support the proposition that the same holds in the massless limit, connecting to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. In addition, our results suggest that thermal agitation in quenched QCD destroys both chiral polarization and condensation of Dirac modes at the same temperature .

1 Introduction

The work presented in this talk is part of a long–term effort to look at QCD vacuum structure in a model–independent manner. This involves devising meaningful, preferably gauge invariant, characteristics of gauge configurations dominating QCD path integral. These configurations are accessible via first–principles lattice QCD simulations, and are not altered from their equilibrium form. The underlying assumption is that when objective information of this kind sufficiently accumulates, it can be eventually integrated into a coherent picture of vacuum–related QCD phenomena. This is the bottom–up approach to QCD vacuum structure [1].

Our focus here is spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking (SChSB), generally viewed as one of the keys to making sense of low–energy hadronic physics. When thinking about SChSB, Dirac eigenmodes immediately pop out. Indeed, spectral representation turns out to be a fruitful way of looking at , revealing that symmetry breakdown is equivalent to Dirac mode condensation. For example, in N=2 theory with quark mass ,

(1)

where is the spectral density of modes and we assumed infinite volume [2]. While the above clarifies meaning of chiral symmetry in spectral language, it offers no dynamical detail on the breaking phenomenon. The underlying goal of this project is to identify such detail in local behavior of Dirac modes.

Our initial interest in this direction are chiral properties of the modes, owing to the intuitive expectation that breakdown of chiral symmetry should be imprinted in such features. While global chirality of Dirac non–zeromodes vanishes, the local chiral behavior reflects properties of the underlying gauge background [3]. The simplest “local inquiry” of the above type is whether values tend to appear with equal participation of left/right subspaces or with asymmetric one. In other words, whether they tend to be chirally polarized or anti–polarized. Such questions were asked some time ago with different goals in mind [3], but it turns out that for our purposes it is crucial that the corresponding measures be dynamical. In the current context, “dynamical measure” is one that it is uniquely defined and involves comparison to statistical independence of left and right. Such measures have been constructed in Ref. [4].

   

Figure 1: Left: chiral polarization scale as found in ensemble E of Ref. [4]. Middle: qualitative behavior of in zero–temperature QCD. Right: same after chiral symmetry restoration by thermal agitation.

In this work we will only deal with the most basic polarization measure, namely the correlation coefficient of chiral polarization . This quantifies the overall tendency toward local chiral asymmetry, and is constructed as follows. Consider the probability distribution of left–right components for a mode or some group of modes. Associated with is the distribution describing statistically independent components. Here and similarly for , with functional forms being the same due to the symmetry of . Now, imagine the experiment in which samples are being drawn simultaneously from and , and compared by their polarization. The outcomes of such comparisons have no arbitrariness, and their statistics defines the probability that sample chosen from is more polarized than one chosen from . The correlation coefficient is then . Consequently, the dynamics enhancing polarization relative to statistical independence is chirally correlated () while the one suppressing it is anti–correlated (): the former supports local chirality while the latter local anti–chirality.

The new dynamical information associated with the above approach is encoded in spectral behavior of , with spectral average in finite volume defined by [5]

(2)

Here is the set of quark masses and the correlation associated with k-th mode. In Ref. [4] it was found that in quenched QCD has a positive core around zero, and switches to negative values at chiral polarization scale (Fig.1, left). It was also shown that is non–zero in the continuum limit at fixed physical volume. Here we present evidence that (1) remains positive in the infinite volume limit and is thus a dynamical scale in the theory, (2) is non–zero in the chiral limit of QCD and SChSB thus proceeds via chirally polarized modes, and (3) vanishes simultaneously with density of near–zeromodes when temperature is turned on, and is thus a scale closely tied to SChSB. Qualitative behavior of in zero–temperature QCD is shown in the middle plot of Fig.1, while that in the chirally symmetric phase at finite temperature is on the right.

Figure 2: Top: for lattice of quenched QCD (left) and infinite volume extrapolation (right). Bottom: for =0.004 lattice of =2+1 QCD (left) and chiral limit extrapolation (right).

2 Infinite volume and chiral limit.

We start with the question of infinite volume limit. As pointed out in Ref. [4], this is of crucial importance in order to establish that represents dynamically generated scale of QCD. We perform the volume study in the context of pure glue lattice QCD with Wilson action at fixed gauge coupling =6.054. Using the parametrization of Ref. [6] and value =0.5 fm this translates into the lattice spacing =0.085 fm. Lattices of sizes 16, 20, 24 and 32 were studied with 100 independent configurations generated in each case.

To probe local chiral properties of modes, we use overlap Dirac operator with parameters =1 and =26/19, and these settings were used throughout this study. Approximately 200 conjugate pairs of lowest near–zeromodes were computed on each configuration, and the average was determined in the available region of the spectrum. In Fig.2 (top left) we show the result for the largest volume, exhibiting the anticipated behavior, and with clearly defined chiral polarization scale. Dependence of on the infrared cutoff is shown in the top right plot of Fig.2, together with the cutoff itself. The data clearly curves away from the cutoff, indicating a positive infinite volume limit. The fit of the form was used to extrapolate to infinite volume, yielding MeV at this cutoff. Judging by the behavior of continuum extrapolation in Ref. [4], the continuum limit is estimated to be MeV in Wilson regularization of quenched QCD.

To study the effects of dynamical fermions, we use the N=2+1 RBC/UKQCD domain wall fermion ensembles of Ref. [7]. These 3264 lattices are at fixed heavy bare mass , approximately corresponding to mass of physical strange quark, and at fixed lattice cutoff fm. The light quark masses reach the lightest pion mass of MeV. Low–lying overlap Dirac eigenmodes were computed on 50 configurations from each ensemble, with functions evaluated on the spectral region available. The result for lightest quark mass is displayed on the bottom left plot of Fig. 2, showing behavior qualitatively similar to quenched case. Chiral polarization scale has been reduced due to the effects of light dynamical quarks, but the sensitivity to light mass has already become negligible in this region, as seen on the bottom right plot of Fig. 2. Positive chiral limit, indicated via extrapolation by a constant, is thus expected. The preferred value is MeV at this cutoff, with rough estimate of MeV in the continuum. Note that, due to flat mass dependence, the above estimates apply both at physical point and in the chiral limit.

Figure 3: Top: temperature dependence of Polyakov line susceptibility (left) and chiral polarization scale (right) as discussed in the text. Bottom: behavior of at (left), and at (right).

3 Chiral transition

We now wish to examine whether low–energy chiral polarization could be tied to chiral symmetry breaking in yet more fundamental way. In particular, we study whether the condensation of Dirac modes () and chiral polarization () tend to occur simultaneously [5]. To that end, we consider quenched QCD at finite temperature where it is expected that, for , Dirac modes cease to condense, and “valence” chiral symmetry becomes restored. Note that the chiral transition temperature was denoted as , in order to distinguish it from the deconfinement temperature defined by the breakdown of symmetry.

We use Wilson lattice regularization again, at the identical gauge coupling =6.054. Overlap Dirac eigenmodes were computed on lattices with , spanning both confined and deconfined regions. In the top left panel of Fig. 3 we plot the temperature dependence of Polyakov line susceptibility, showing expected behavior with peak at (=8). The value of , including all extrapolations, is taken from Ref. [8]. Note that for spectral calculations, only configurations from the “real ” Polyakov line sector were used [9], so that the continuation to theory with dynamical quarks is smooth.

In Fig. 3 (bottom) we show the computed at (), and at (). In the former (confined) case there is a positive core of chiral polarization, while only anti–polarization exists in the (deconfined) latter.111The red points in the plot for denote bins with not enough eigenmodes for error to be estimated. Closer inspection reveals a discrepancy of chiral polarization behavior with respect to confinement, but not with respect to mode condensation. Indeed, as can be seen in Fig. 3 (top right), chiral polarization is present () at =1.2 (), i.e. quite safely in the deconfined phase. At the same time though, as the profile of mode density in Fig. 4 suggests, in the narrow band close to zero, consistently with condensation and breakdown of valence chiral symmetry. The residual density of this kind was first observed in [10]. Our result thus supports both the polarization–condensation equivalence conjecture of Ref. [5], and the possibility that in quenched QCD.

        

Figure 4: Detail of mode density at low end of the spectrum for =7. Isolated band of near–zero modes is clearly visible. Zero modes are not included.

4 Discussion

“Bottom–up” approach to QCD vacuum structure starts with identifying the features associated with important vacuum effects, such as confinement or SChSB, and characterizing them in a model–independent manner. Here we focused on SChSB and found that it is intimately tied to dynamical local chirality of low–lying Dirac modes. In particular, strong interaction supports the band of chirally polarized low–energy modes that condense, and are thus “carriers” of the breaking phenomenon. The width of the band provides for a new dynamical scale associated with SChSB. Simultaneous occurrence of mode condensation and chiral polarization at finite temperature supports the possibility that chiral symmetry breakdown (true and “valence”) is equivalent to presence of chiral polarization, and thus non–zero  [5]. This would extend the equivalence of Eq. (1) to include the independent condition .

References

References

  • [1] Horváth I 2006 Preprint hep-lat/0605008
  • [2] Banks T and Casher A 1980 Nucl.Phys. B169 125 (Preprint hep-lat/9501037)
  • [3] Horváth I, Isgur N, McCune J, Thacker H B 2002 Phys.Rev. D65 014502 (Preprint hep-lat/0102003)
  • [4] Alexandru A, Draper T, Horváth I, Streuer T 2011 Annals Phys. 326 1941 (Preprint arXiv:1009.4451)
  • [5] Alexandru A and Horváth I 2012 Preprint arXiv:1210.7849
  • [6] ALPHA Collaboration, Guagnelli M, Sommer R and Wittig H 1998 Nucl.Phys. B535 389 (Preprint hep-lat/9806005)
  • [7] RBC and UKQCD Collaborations, Mawhinney R 2009 PoS LAT2009 81 (Preprint arXiv:0910.3194)
  • [8] Karsch F 1998 Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 60A 169 (Preprint hep-lat/9706006)
  • [9] Chandrasekharan S and Christ N 1996 Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 47 527 (Preprint hep-lat/9509095)
  • [10] Edwards R G, Heller U M, Kiskis J E, Narayanan R 2000 Phys.Rev. D61 074504 (Preprint hep-lat/9910041)
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
219714
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description